« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

How House Republican Leaders Are Going to Betray House Republican Freshmen

Allow me to explain what the House Republicans are doing — not that they will ever admit it.

The House Republicans leaders are scared to death of shutting down the government, never mind that a shutdown is really just a slow down.

The House Republicans leaders absolutely, unequivocally do not want a shut down. Mean time, the Democrats would love a shutdown. They remember 1995, and they remember that it was the government shutdown of 1995 that put Bill Clinton back in the driver’s seat.

While all of this is going on, we have Senate Democrat Leader Harry Reid saying we cannot defund the National Endowment of the Humanities because no one would show up at a cowboy poetry festival in Nevada.

We also have Senate Republican Saxby Chambliss now saying he’s willing to consider tax increases and unwilling to defund National Public Radio.

With the House Republicans’ unwillingness to shut down the government, they’ve out negotiated themselves. But the leadership and its inability to effectively whip its own freshman means the leadership needs a plan to scare the beejeezus out of Freshman Republicans. That plan requires a three week continuing resolution.

Let me tell you why.

What comes up in April? The debt ceiling debacle.

Merging the continuing resolution debate and the debt ceiling debate together would be the worst possible situation for conservatives. It would limit their negotiating position for substantive cuts when the clock is ticking toward what Democrats and Republican leaders are calling not just a shut down situation, but a default situation.

If a continuing resolution and debt ceiling debate were merged, moderates would be empowered to push for minimal cuts, no defunding of Obamacare, no defunding of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, no defunding of Planned Parenthood, etc. Republican leaders in the House and Democratic leaders in the Senate would be in the comfy position of being able to ignore conservatives in the name of a “good government compromise,” which is Washington Speak for growing the size and scope of government while pretending not to.

It is crucial for conservatives to fight against the short term CR and force the Democrat and Republican Leaders to sit down now and start making real cuts. The cuts the Republicans are proposing are a drop in the bucket to real reform.

The voters put the GOP in power to cut the size of government. It is time to do just that.

Below is a list of Freshman Republicans to call and demand they oppose the House GOP Leadership’s short term continuing resolution. Call 202-224-3121, ask for the Congressman, and tell him to oppose the new short term CR and demand he support substantive cuts and a long term plan.

These are the freshmen who voted for the Mulvaney amendment to bring spending levels back to the 2006 level. The vote was 93 to 328. It is a pretty good list of the most conservative members and freshmen with some anomaloies (Denham, Hurt, etc.).

You can reach each of these Congressmen by calling 202-224-3121.

1) Amash (MI) *voted against the first CR
2) Buerkle (NY)
3) Denham (CA)
4) Duncan (SC)
5) Ellmers (NC)
6) Fleishmann (TN)
7) Gardner (CO)
8) Gowdy (SC)
9) Griffin (AZ)
10) Griffith (VA)
11) Harris (MD)
12) Huizenga (MI)
13) Huelskamp (KS) *already opposed
14) Hurt (VA)
15) Labrador (ID)
16) Landry (LA)
17) Mulvaney (SC)
18) Pompeo (KS)
19) Reed (NY)
20) Ribble (WI)
21) Rigell (VA)
22) Rokita (IN)
23) Schweikert (AZ)
24) A. Scott (GA)
25) T. Scott (SC)
26) Southerland (FL)
27) Stutzman (IN)
28) Walsh (IL)
29) Woodall (GA)
30) T. Young (IN)

Other obvious conservative freshmen who didn’t vote for the Mulvaney amendment:

31) Fincher (TN)
32) Lankford (OK)
33) Webster (FL)
34) West (FL)

Of the non-freshmen, these are the conservatives that should be no brainers that we need to hear from soon:

1) Broun (GA)
2) Chaffetz (UT)
3) Coffman (CO)
4) Fleming (LA)
5) Foxx (NC)
6) Franks (AZ)
7) Flake (AZ)
8) Garrett (NJ)
9) Jordan (OH)
10) Lamborn (CO)
11) McClintock (CA)
12) Pearce (NM)
13) Pence (IN)
14) Scalise (LA)
15) Graves (GA)
16) Blackburn (TN)
17) Lummis (WY)

Bachmann, Gohmert, Paul, Jones, and Steve King are presumably already a no vote because they voted against the first CR.

COMMENTS

  • whiskey_sierra

    Seeing as they can’t even seem to cut 100B, which is THREE PERCENT!! I am not hopeful for anything.

    Cutting 3 cents out of every dollar: sounds almost impossible, does it not? It does if your a republican.

    The R party is pretty much a lost cause.

    And once you realize the R-party is a lost cause, you realize that they are the last home and then you realize THE REPUBLIC is dead.

    All that is left to do know is to play the music while the ship goes down.

  • alreadyexists

    The leadership of the Republican caucus in the House of Representatives can not have both ways and they can’t split the baby without paying a steep price at the ballot box. If Boehner can’t bring himself to take a firm stand here and now on debt reduction, then Tea Party organizations should start rolling out third party candidates right away. I think it will genuinely shock the NRCC when these candidates start fund raising and they see how much money starts flowing their way. In this scenario, these candidates should run against the betrayal of the Republican leadership. It’s not too late for Boehner to stop crying and start manning up, but time is running out.

  • IJB
  • earlgrey

    has always been rock solid conservative, and she is voiting for this thing. No rep. can be taken for granted for a much needed reality check.

  • dsmurf

    revenues and deficit spending every month of this Presidency, just prep military and entitlements? bills prepped and to hell with NPR, Obamacare, Planned Parenthood, and the Presidential Czars.

  • caboose

    house members now. Chambliss was bragging how he and Colburn and one other Senator was “The Most Conservative In The Senate,” Bull S-ht! Chambliss and Colburn have just been elected for another six years. There-in lies the problem. Once they are re-elected pretending to be conservatives, they tell the people who elected them, with their actions, to take a hike. In order to put a stop to this fraud by these liars, we must demand that the six year term of these phonies be changed to two year terms just like the House of Representatives. Yes it will take an amendment to the US constitution. That should not deter the effort to make the change, after all judges change it all the time, without a second thought. Come to think about it, they don’t give it a first thought!

  • Maggie_in_Indiana

    And it knows how to work the system in DC. Rinos get their voices heard and their voters to vote them by saying what we want ot hear.But then they do as they are now. The newbees will continue to fight as long as we keep reminding them we are bhind them and are watching. I think it’s the best of both worlds, experienced politicians and starry eyed patriots, it’ll come together when it comes down to fighting against the left. How long we have to wait for that is anybodys guess.

  • AceInTX

    Yet the Senate and the White House are driving the Budget…why is that exactly?

    Oh…and what was that earth shattering even that happened in November? It’s a fading Memory now and I just can’t seem to recall what that was all about.

    The more things change it seems the more the Dems keep them the same…somehow…

    how is that possible?

  • noquarter

    I think Speaker Boehner lost all his testosterone through his mellow crying scenes. On the other hand former Speaker Palosi somehow managed to steal enough testosterone to almost single handidly manage a herd of progressives. Not much can be said for Boehner except he balks and balks and IS losing time trying to be respectful and benevolent to an unforgiving Obama, who is most likely enjoying the no-back-bone conservative leadership..thats Boehner and McConnell. Wheres all the hooorahhh when we took the House, did it stop once we were seated, NO. Bachman and King are wearing the pants in this latest struggle to kill the healthcare 105 billion spending slush fund. Boehner should ask her where he could purchase the potion that gave her a couple of big ones. Just remember that 2012 is just around the corner and those that stop to think of their careers, know they will be known for what they do.

  • noquarter

    But unfortunately, and amendment most likely would not fly. We do have tools to take them out of office, the same people that voted them to office could very well start recal proceedings..I think we are at that point, Chambliss would be first on the list, even an attempt would be threatening to him. I read that Chambliss was leaning towards voting for a tax increase also…that is not acceptable.

  • rever

    Thanks Erick for this analysis. I am happy that my congressman, at least, is a definite no on the CR.

    It is interesting, as I note in the title, that Rasmussen has a new high for the repeal of the health care law. But it would appear that the GOP leadership, like the Dem. leadership before it, has decided to bravely sail against the prevailing winds of public opinion.

    It is amazing and heartbreaking to watch.

  • rever

    Actually, I should have said new high since May of last year at which point it was 63%.

  • Praying

    This is starting to look a lot like “Groundhog Day” – the same old, same old, over and over and over. Will someone please WAKE ME UP – no, wait, I’m already awake! Wake THEM up! Geesch. I have called, I have emailed (my rep). I’m hopeful, but not optimistic, if that makes sense. The tail is wagging the dog – again.

  • runner12

    on these guys to make some serious cuts to the budget. It does amaze me though how out of touch with the American people they conitnue to be.

    True leadership takes courage and it means making tough decisions. It is time for the Repubs to grow a spine and start cutting spending!

  • runner12

    on these guys to make some serious cuts to the budget. It does amaze me though how out of touch with the American people they conitnue to be.

    True leadership takes courage and it means making tough decisions. It is time for the Repubs to grow a spine and start cutting spending!

  • trpeacocke

    …must go, asap. They have proven themselves to be worse than useless. The Democrats are doing everything they can to make themselves look foolish and to turn themselves into easy targets–with comments about cowboy poetry, etc. it’s like shooting fish in a bucket–but these pantywaist Repubs are still too afraid to pull the trigger. (No, I am not suggesting that physical violence be done to the Dems. That was a metaphor.)

    I get it, gentlemen: you’re afraid of becoming the next Scott Walker/Michelle Bachmann/Sarah Palin; of having to hire round-the-clock protection for yourselves and your families; of having PI’s go through your trash cans and underwear drawers, looking for anything that can be used to destroy you…No, taking on the Dems isn’t going to be easy, but it’s absolutely necessary; so, if you’re not willing to do your jobs, step aside and give the reins to someone who is.

  • trpeacocke

    …to do the jobs that Boehner, Cantor, and McConnell won’t do: Jim DeMint, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Michele Bachmann, Pete King, Allen West…and they’re all here legally…

    Actually, so far Rand Paul has been the most impressive, by far. He’s like an anti-statist Energizer Bunny. And, if you can go on lib shows, make your hosts look silly, without being thrown off or compromising your principles…well, you’re made of steel and we need more of you…

  • sccrenny

    when I was looking down the list for my Rep (Gowdy, who replaced Bob Inglis) and spotted the smiley. He’s OK so far but we’re RIGHT behind him to be sure. SC seems to be well represented with 4 of the 6 districts on the list. Of course, Clyburn is liberal to the point of socialist. (“There ARE no rules- we make them up as we go along.”) I’ll have to check that other district.

  • rightwingmom52

    where my parents live and talked to his staffer at length. He tried his best to convince me that the $6 billion in cuts was substantial and when prorated gets to the $100 billion mark. He said Congressman DesJarlais was listening to both sides of the CR argument, and that he has been approached by the leadership. I told him they should listen to King & Bachmann instead. My conversation convinced me that the legislative staffers may very well be the problem in many cases because this jerk said it seemed like what he was hearing from callers was an all or nothing viewpoint on the CR, that without time to “prepare” for the shutdown it would be blamed on the GOP, and that we needed to not just win the battle but the war. Among other things, I told him that the blame game was just media & Dem spin, and that they need to do the right thing regardless, and that we the people on the ground know better and will support those who stand firm. When I suggested he read a couple of the articles here, including this one, he said he had already read them.

    Of course, I said all this after pointing out that my nephew is the vice chairman of the local Republican party in one of the congressman’s counties, and that I am working with a network of people trying to become precinct chairmen. Works like a charm.

  • mspector

    Now we sit here on April 10 with a statistically meaningless budget cut being hailed by Obama and Reid as “historic”, and no traction on freezing the debt ceiling much less defunding Obamacare and stripping the EPA of its wide-ranging regulatory authority. Boehner needed to push Obama to compromise, and instead Boehner is made to seem to have blinked at the “shutdown”. That does not bode well for Round 2. The worst part is, conservative poker player that he is, Obama probably would have caved rather than go “all-in”, especially since he did not know how the “all-in” would play with the electorate.

    Thankfully we had some — Rand Paul, Michelle Bachmann, Allen West chief among them — who stood firm.