« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Operation Gun Walker: An Act of War Against Mexico With One American Murdered Already

As the sun is rising this morning, it appears more and more that the Obama Administration committed an actual, factual act of war against Mexico through sheer incompetence that has left at least one American border patrol agent murdered.

What if I told you that the Obama Administration’s Justice Department authorized the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (the “ATF”) to rig gun background checks so gun runners could “walk” guns into Mexico after clearing an instant background check at various gun stores in the U.S.?

What if I told you that the Department of Justice and ATF did this to try to build a picture of Mexican Drug Cartels so the cartels could be taken out?

What if I told you that the ATF’s authorization of this operation, called by them “Fast and Furious“, corresponded to an increase in gun violence by drug cartels in Mexico?

What if I told you the Obama Administration never told the Mexican Government — making this a clear act of war under any host of international precedents?

What if I told you that at least one, and maybe more, American border patrol agents were murdered by guns passed over the border with the permission of the ATF?

And what if I told you that the Department of Justice and ATF decided to use the gun running they authorized, enabled, and oversaw as evidence in the Obama Administration’s fight to crack down on gun sales in the United States?

You’d think I was crazy, wouldn’t you? You’d think I had Obama Derangement Syndrome, wouldn’t you?

I’ll be honest. Had this come from any one of a million different right wing websites, I would be deeply suspicious that there were key details missing in order to paint a picture of an out of control Obama Administration and Eric Holder.

What if I told you the source of this fantastical story is the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric?

The facts here fit a pattern in Obama’s Department of Justice. Remember the Somali teen who the FBI gave pretend explosives to so the kid could take out a bunch of people in Oregon — or at least plot to? Only now, instead of imaginary bombs, the Department of Justice is authorizing real weapons that are being used to murder actual Americans.

Surveillance video obtained by CBS News shows suspected drug cartel suppliers carrying boxes of weapons to their cars at a Phoenix gun shop. The long boxes shown in the video being loaded in were AK-47-type assault rifles.

So it turns out ATF not only allowed it – they videotaped it.

Documents show the inevitable result: The guns that ATF let go began showing up at crime scenes in Mexico. And as ATF stood by watching thousands of weapons hit the streets… the Fast and Furious group supervisor noted the escalating Mexican violence.

One e-mail noted, “958 killed in March 2010 … most violent month since 2005.” The same e-mail notes: “Our subjects purchased 359 firearms during March alone,” including “numerous Barrett .50 caliber rifles.”

Senator Chuck Grassley “began investigating after his office spoke to Dodson and a dozen other ATF sources — all telling the same story.”

Now Congressman Darrell Issa is promising a congressional investigation. on the Rodger Hedgecock Show last night, Congressman Issa told Roger he is going to make sure there is a full inquiry into what happened.

The question, of course, to use the cliché, is what did Eric Holder and Barack Obama know and when did they know it.

One final note on this — CBS News itself does not get into the speculation that the Justice Department will be using this information to go after gun shops in this country. That’s just what ATF agents are whispering to Congress directly.

Had it not been CBS News, I’d say this was crazy talk. But they have the emails, videos, and actual ATF agents all saying the same thing.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • davesinsanantonio

    Not really.
    What will surprise me is we actually get an impeachment issued out of this. And, even more surprised if we get a conviction.

  • america1st

    . . . such that the reaction will derail ?bowma’s efforts to further restrict the 2nd Amendment, including the Traver nomination to head ATF.

    Is the death to which you refer, would that be the agent forced to defend himself with bean bags? His blood is on the hands of big momma & the rest of the scurrilous crew of this utterly worthless regime.

  • rcastonjr

    IMPEACHMENT!!!!

  • saccrewdog

    repatriating historic Garand and carbine rifles that we left in South Korea at the end of the active conflict there, the 0 will not allow it. High – tech, modern weapons, though, can be used as “tracking devices.” I’m getting the feeling that 0 doesn’t trust us.

  • ag8tor

    if BHO and any of his henchmen have ever actually read the Constituion. Is there a part I missed where it says “the President and Attorney General have the right to pick and choose which laws they want to abide by and protect”? Evidently that is the way they interpret it.Another nausiating example of BHO considering himself “Emporer” instead of “President”. This administration is the most disgustingly arrogant group ever to stain DC.

  • http://climbingtherubicon.blogspot.com towerclimber

    The owner of the Sipsey street irregulars website. Between him and David Codrea, 2 long time 2nd amendment advocates and constitutionalists, they managed to bring this to the attention of Sen. Grassley.
    Most of the MSM avoided this like the plague until whistleblowers in the BATF came forward and said that they were willing to testify in front of a congressional oversight committee.
    That’s when CBS got involved and did a segment on it.

    The BATF is trying to ignore it in the hopes that if they don’t comment on it, they won’t legitimize it.

    yeah, THAT’S not working well for them. The family of the killed border patrol agent wants answers. the Senator wants answers and the rest of us want to curb the power of the BATF because they’re abusing it and ignoring the constitution.

    They’re running guns in order to boost their power and credibility.
    It’s the same thing they did at Waco and the Ruby Ridge. They break the law in order to catch other lawbreakers and in each of these instances, people have died.

  • tlhanger

    The agent was Brian Terry. A great young man. He was in my sons class at Flat Rock High School in Flat Rock, Michigan . Everyone from there is so sad. Comes from a great family. Have we given up the protection of our people for Obama’s agenda. Looks that way. Please do not forget.

  • jackbenimble

    What really torqued me off about this was that the whole time the BATF was playing this dangerous game of deliberately allowing military grade weapons to flow illegally into Mexico, the government was trying to use the flow of weapons into Mexico as an excuse for limiting gun rights for law abiding citizens. They frequently tried to pin the blame on American gun dealers when in-fact it turns out that these dealers were reporting these suspicious transactions and the BATF was requiring them to allow the illegal sales.

    Knowing that things like automatic weapons and handgrenades that frequently show up at Cartel gunfights are not readily available at civilian gunshows and gun shops, I long scoffed at the idea that these weapons were originating in America. I assumed that if these weapons carried US serial numbers, that they were supplied by our military to the Mexican military and were then sold out the back door of the Mexican armory by a corrupt Mexican. It is disheartening to learn that it was actually corrupt American law enforcement that was guilty of these illegal sales.

    The BATF is the most corrupt and useless of all the Federal law enforcement agencies. I can think of no reason why they should continue to exist.

  • politicallydisgusted

    IS criminal. Obama’s Justice Department, most of his Administration and the ?ATF? should be prosecuted for their criminal activity, and their treasonous actions against the American citizens and the USA.
    They’re making deals with the devil and getting Americans killed to boot. The gun runners and drug dealers have no respect or use for anyone who is not assisting them in their mission. They really have no respect for each other. And CBS? Katie soft touch Kouric? Yeah, that’s some hard hitting coverage. She’s another useful idiot for the left. You won’t get anything news worthy out of that mouth.

  • grammy1

    Oh’s! buddies call the Constitution a “living, breathing document.” Apparently it is also a contortionist. You got ir right!

  • grammy1

    to God’s ears!

  • Locked and Loaded

    nt

  • Locked and Loaded

    nt

  • Finrod

    Obama will toss Holder under the bus eventually to save his own skin, it’s just a matter of time, IMHO.

  • johnt

    And look at what you have in the AG’s office.
    As all of this, the entire Obama catastrophe, continues, who knows, maybe a few leftists will divert their hatred of Normal People and begin to have a smidgen of shame.

  • Tbone

    as Libya did.

  • america1st

    Could you expand on this a bit? I’ve read quite a bit about this deadly insanity and for all the feckless stupidity involved, I truly don’t see how it qualifies as such.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • http://www.walkerprise.com kingstonjw

    I am not yet ready to escalate this discussion as an act of war by the United States against Mexico, a close (but corrupt) and troubled neighbor. After all, powerful countries have a long history of subverting other countries through proxy without meeting the threshold of war. The House and Senate likely had no knowledge.

    What It is, is almost certainly an unimaginable act of negligence where highly intelligent people should have known the possible outcomes. So far we know this directly resulted in the loss of many innocent lives, including an American, and directly subverted the Mexican government. What were they thinking? Why aren’t people already resigning in droves?

    I’d love to hear what Oliver North has to say about this…

    The question to me now is how hard will the liberal establishment rally around the first black AG of the US for the sake of political correctness? He has survived incredible incompetence thus far. Will this make any difference? Hearings will move at the pace of sludge.

    What was State’s involvement or was HIllary Clinton cut out? Is there any tangible connection to her UN effort to globally inhibit our own second amendment rights?

    If there is an act of war in all of this, I am going to speculate instead it is an act of treason against the American people and the subversion of our Constitution, with Mexico as a victim of collateral damage. I suppose that is over the shark and even cynical.

  • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

    Katie Couric & CBS reporting on this story alone would be suspect. It is the fact that the conservative blogosphere has chronicled and pushed this story into the mainstream that lends credibility to CBS, not the other way around.

  • powertothepeople

    but unless something changes, it is coming.

    The danger in Mexico is real but has not affected us that much to this point. We know their drug cartels members and killers have been in our country, we know they have tunneled in to our country, we know their are credible reports that contract for death have been put on some of our citizens by the cartels, etc but up to this point, they have kept much of the violence on their own side.

    Problem is, it may not stay there.I watched a video the other day that showed Mexican troops crossing our border at night delivering what is believed to be drugs and cartel members. This alone, nor the occasional crossing my the cartel is not enough to go to war, but once the violence pours into our side, we will have to do something since it is obvious the Mexican gov’t is impotent.

    I would, most likely, never support a full invasion over drugs and the violence associated with it. But I would absolutely support a few(many) troops going over and wiping out the cartels then using them to secure our border. We are also going to have to drop the PC nonsense and go to war with the gangs in our own country who are the lifeline on this side for the drug trade.

    In the meantime, lets hope and pray that the Mexican Gov’t is able to figure out how to deal with it or at least that it all stays on that side and we can live in relative peace.

  • The_Gadfly

    at least 67 Republicans to get a conviction in the Senate.

    Because unlike the NRA (who’ve actually been onto this story for a few months now and doing much of the digging), I don’t expect Dingy Harry or Dingel to vote for the conviction.

  • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison
  • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison
  • The_Gadfly

    for certain operations police engage in. The catch of course is that when most police engage in it, they have actual authority to work in all of the locations from which they have to gather information, and work very, very hard not to lose their tails when their targets are actually carrying the contraband. Essentially the clowns running this operation lost track of the bad guys soon after they crossed into Mexico.

    And according to the article I read in the monthly NRA mag, the gun store owners were practically begging the BATF to turn down the purchases because they smelled so bad.

  • The Grognard

    Conspiracy.

    ?noun, plural -cies.
    1. the act of conspiring.
    2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
    3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose.
    4. Law . an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
    5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

    I agree with Limbaugh that Obama hates this country and is purposely set to do it harm.

    Heads need to (figuratively) roll on this one. It makes one wonder what else they’re up to behind the scenes.

  • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison

    Certain individuals in the right-wing blogosphere (e.g. the Front Pagers here, Malkin, etc) are well vetted and reliable, but flawed and biased as it is, the MSM has standards, procedures, and editorial standards that make them a pretty reliable source for most facts, if an imperfect one that botches things badly at times (e.g. the Dan Rather/George W. Bush incident). Personally, I get almost all of my news from the Internet, as I don’t have cable (b/c think that the vast majority of its programming is a raunch-filled, irritating waste of time and money). Aside from a few right-leaning sites (RS, NRO), I get my news from the MSM and by digging into interesting stories by researching them.

  • The_Gadfly

    Arming a group working to overthrow or undermine a legitimate (even thought they are corrupt) government has always been on the list of “acts of war.” Whether or not the injured nation chooses to declare war, make a diplomatic incident out of it, or simply ignore it is at the discretion of the injured nation. I would expect Mexico to make this a diplomatic incident, particularly now that it has hit CBS. To ignore it is to publicly look weak. On the other hand, launching an actual war would be suicidal. Sadly, for as much as I love our country, and for as much as the Mexican govt is corrupt, in this instance they will be correct to lodge a diplomatic protest.

  • skorrent1

    Obama is one of “his people”.

  • america1st

    Then we were at war in Africa, the Middle East, South America, etc. for the last half of the 20th Century? Just asking, ’cause I have vivid memories of insurgencies actively, if clandestinely, supported by Administrations across this period which went far beyond turning a blind eye to violations of the NFA & GCA – and I don’t recall anyone except possibly some fringe lefties calling any of these “an act of war.” I’m not including our military operations in Indochina, Bosnia & Korea, which were most definitely of this nature, despite being characterized as “police actions.”

    Where Erick has the legal background, I thought there might be a cite to a USC ? or some such which I overlooked in my *cursory* research. My question was not a ‘gotcha,’ but a serious inquiry and respectfully both your reply & that of Mr. Garrison are neither evidentiary nor persuasive.

    I would further note that if tolerating outgoing border violations is an act of war, we have been the subject of innumerable such over the past 60 years.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    But still it will take a majority of Republicans steeling their spines to vote for it and carry through the process… Good luck with that since so far the O has given reason after reason for impeachment and probably wOn’t be touched out of fear unless he shows up to a news conference wearing a diaper and speaking in tongues… but even then looking at Biden might save him from being fired…

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Be given to drug dealers/gangs/impoverished inner city union members instead of boy scouts or other civics groups he wouldn’t mind it so much.

  • http://tomcox.wordpress.com tenntom

    I’m not holding my breath, but wouldn’t a rational mind expect to see senior ATF and DOJ officials indicted as accessories to the murder of a federal officer?

    Isn’t someone who deliberately furnishes a deadly weapon to a known criminal, resulting in murder, as guilty of murder as the person who pulled the trigger? Will Holder read himself his own rights?

  • skorrent1

    That any of the “ATF weapons” were actually illegal sales. We know that CBS doesn’t know or care what an “assault weapon” is. We know that the .50 cal rifles are bolt action, and that “AK-47′s” can be sold as regular (auto-loading) rifles. CBS will call them all “anti-tank” weapons and “assault weapons” without a qualm, equating them to RPGs and machine guns.

    The tragedy is, of course, that it takes only one or two sales to be tracked down to provide evidence sufficient to crack down on illegal strawman sales. For this to go on for years with hundreds of sales per month means you’re probably right that ATF was trying to get sufficient evidence to shut down gun stores in this country.

  • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison

    The House is the accusatory body, and the Senate is the adjudicatory body, so it has to pass both (first the House, then the Senate). This is why Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson were impeached but not convicted (Both were one vote shy).

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Hey Mexico!

    How about charging the O (or Holder) with felonies against your country and demanding they be extradited for trial?

    Just a thought, it’s understood here if you don’t want to soil your country with their presence.

  • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

    The mainstream media has shown us nothing if not that it has no journalistic standards related to politics other than those that serve the Leftist agenda. They have thrown their lot in fully with Leftism, and have shown themselves willing to repeatedly and completely undermine their own credibility for the sake of helping Leftism or damaging conservatism. They don’t even try to hide it anymore.

    Sure, there are some unreliable Internet sources. You have to wade through he crapola to get to the truth.

    My point wasn’t that conservative Internet sources are all credible, but rather that a CBS report from Katie Couric in and of itself is a completely unreliable source, and that conservative Internet sources having been onto this story out front of the CBS report gives CBS some cover of credibility that they otherwise would not enjoy – at least not from myself and tens-of-millions of other conservatives.

  • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison

    Andrew Johnson’s conviction failed by one vote. Clinton’s failed by 17. I was thinking that it took 51, and it would have taken 67. 50 Senators voted guilty on the obstruction of justice charge. Sorry about that.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I meant arming not funding!

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    And most of us have heard of it.

  • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

    …is that conservatives often have a kneejerk proclivity to apologize for their own side, and demonstrate it by highlighting their willingness to distance themselves from allies, and taking it a step further by offering credibility to undeserving liberals, as if somehow hat-tipping liberals gives our claims on the conservative side some magical credibility of impartiality.

    We never win by undermining our own and lending credibility to the enemy. The Left instinctively knows and practices this. I would never go as far as they do – defending the indefensible as a way of life. But I would not be so quick (as Erick seems to have been here) to seek credibility by eschewing the conservative blogoshpere and embracing Katie Couric and CBS.

  • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)
  • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

    I mean the CBS editors behind Katie Couric have been known to embellish, and imply, and attempt to drive narrative.

    I would think their strategy is to drive a wedge, widen a controversy, and then promulgate a narrative for dialogue around a particular subject… Why would they do that?

    Scenario 1:This could be a collusion effort between CBS and Obama Admin to distract Tea Party folks, and others from some very important things that should be discussed right now…

    They could be just trying to fuel the rage so we forget about more important, but less interesting and less shocking realities that we can impact like coming up with a budget, repeal of obamacare, dealing with trade imbalance, absolute failure to foreign policy, failure to deal with the looming energy cost crisis, food crisis, and “anything else that ends with crisis” crises… etc.

    Scenario 2:
    CBS is trying to flush out right wingers and discredit them… give them a little source… then pull out the rug when they come out with “new evidence”…

    Here they claim the “scoop”… and they embarrass the market competitors foolish enough to go down the rabbit hole.

    Either way, I’m looking forward to further inquiries by either an inspector general, congressional representatives, ad-hoc joint committees, and individuals and organizations that can provide verifiable evidence regarding…What “they” knew, and when did “they” know it.

    I sincerely wish I could believe CBS has no agenda and is just reporting the facts… but come on… seriously… come on, are we that blind? come on. :)

  • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

    Scenario 3:
    Start a new dialogue about gun control, and how gun shop owners are to blame, rather that the administration’s policies of allowing this to happen.

    I could go on… but really… CBS and Katie Couric are not the gumshoe reporters of old… they’re agenda driven leftists and liberals that simply want to win at all costs… even if their own forest is burned down.

  • america1st

    Apparently we are having some communication issues here and, seemingly, questions which might even infer some disagreement are unwelcome, to be dismissed with sarcasm. I believe you wrong, but where it’s largely a matter of semantics & technicalities, I’m not going to waste any more time attempting to explain a view you have no interest in hearing.

    At the end of the day, given the carnage on the border where the Mexican government (or at least a good chunk of their officials, police & military) are actively ignoring / supporting the illegal aliens, drug running, etc., my concern is far more with the propaganda Barky & Co. will attempt to generate by attributing the results of their gross as reflecting on the firearms industry and American firearms owners.

  • johnt

    No ?

  • runner12

    1.) This is shocking that the US government would sanction the purchase of guns by cartels, even if there motives were to take them down. It shows a shockingly naive view of how organized these cartels can be. Did they not think that they would find a way to lose the ATF agents? Besides, did anyone weigh the possible damage such an action could cause (ie the deaths of innocent people)?

    2.) I find myself skeptical about CBS reporting this. Since when did they become a truth-seeking news organization? They have always been shills ever since I can remember. The only explanation I have is that a.) they wanted to scoop the story in order to control the narrative (ie make sure Obama is not implicated, b). their professional egos took over their liberal tendencies. They saw a good story and wanted to be credited with breaking it.

    Either way, they are investigating something that needs to be looked into and that is a good thing.

  • runner12

    1.) This is shocking that the US government would sanction the purchase of guns by cartels, even if there motives were to take them down. It shows a shockingly naive view of how organized these cartels can be. Did they not think that they would find a way to lose the ATF agents? Besides, did anyone weigh the possible damage such an action could cause (ie the deaths of innocent people)?

    2.) I find myself skeptical about CBS reporting this. Since when did they become a truth-seeking news organization? They have always been shills ever since I can remember. The only explanation I have is that a.) they wanted to scoop the story in order to control the narrative (ie make sure Obama is not implicated, b). their professional egos took over their liberal tendencies. They saw a good story and wanted to be credited with breaking it.

    Either way, they are investigating something that needs to be looked into and that is a good thing.

  • leehazel

    I think the following may be a little easier to understand regarding the roles of the House and Senate in a POTUS impeachment proceeding.
    The House: The house examines the evidence, calls witnesses (including the accused), and determines if a “crime” of sufficient seriousness has occurred. If they find in favor of impeachment then a formal document (impeachment) is prepared and served to the various participants as outlined in law and the Constitution. This document for all intents and purposes functions as an Indictment. In this instance the House functions in much the same way as a Grand Jury.
    The Senate: Once the Senate has the “Indictment” they may either proceed to trial or not. If they try, it will be completely similar to any courtroom action accept for the players and the size of the “Jury”. The Senate and the VPOTUS make up the entire jury.
    If the trial proceeds and the subsequent vote is yes to Remove the Offender from Office, that is the end of it as far as the Two Legislative Houses are concerned. If the vote is no everyone goes back to whatever they were doing before the whole thing started.
    Behavior might be modified by events, but little else would follow.

  • AceInTX

    just wondering