started this fight for one reason – to look less like the sissy he is, in order to get re-elected. He is an all too typical liberal who “sends the troops in,” but with their hands tied. He cares so much for our troops and airmen, he goes partying in Rio and golfing while they face bullets.

UN Security Resolution 1973 authorizes “humanitarian” intervention but not support for either side. This is of course an illusion since bombs are going to fall and people are going to be hurt and killed, so the question of where the bombs fall is paramount. But that aside, immediately in our intervention we took up support of the rebels — without knowing who they were (more or less) and without knowing their plan. Now Obama is starting to acknowledge that may not have been the greatest idea in the world, but the damage is already done in that we chose sides, destroying any leverage we might have had with Gaddafi and demonstrating our lack of perspective and policy.

lack of knowledge of what’s going on and who we are involved with. This administration will go down as the most ignorant and embarrasing one in our history. The saddest part is that he is doing all this to make himself look presidential for the coming election. He has been in full campaign mode since the first of the year. hence the vacations when the budget is a hot item and this Libyan “crisis” while we are still in two other conflicts. To be a supposedly smart indivdual, he sure doesn’t act like one. I guess the next time we see him in public will be in Houston at the final 4. That seems to be something he actually knows something about! I hear he’s actually made a decision about who will win. First time for everything!

The armed fighters are Islamic extremists. They won’t talk to you. The defecting Qaddafi officials will, and they know exactly what to tell you. But these former officials have not started the revolt and are not in control.

and I think I know which side he is secretly rooting for to win. (hint: it’s not America).

doesn’t seem to fit the profile of anyone that would traditionally be considered a friend. Why is that?

there is a plan, and that is to oust a leader that is not under the thumb of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Will say that the tea party is part of Quaddafi’s regime…

Obama is arming al-qaeda in Libya, and supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
These are sworn enemies of the US (killed thousands of us, still trying, declared jihad, and has a stated goal of destroying the US and implementing a global caliphate.)

Explain to me how arming the enemy of the US is not treason.

If I was arming the Soviet Union in 1962, or 72, or 82… I’d be thrown in jail, or even put to death for treason.

But when our president arms our enemy, it’s just fine. Got it.

Under Bush we fought against terrorists.

Under Obama we’re helping them.

What’s wrong with this picture?