Paul Clement Resigns From King & Spalding


Paul Clement, former Solicitor General of the United States, is resigning from King & Spalding today. The Atlanta based law firm, which made news a few years ago by representing terrorists in Guantanamo Bay is bailing on representing the United States House of Representatives in defending the Defense of Marriage Act.

Gay-rights agitators attacked the law firm, pledged boycotts of the law firm, etc. and have been successful in driving King & Spalding away from the representation. This, of course, will inspire and embolden gay rights groups that have made a habit of attacking the people and businesses opposed to gay marriage all with the blind eye of the Obama and silence of a sympathetic media.

Clement’s letter can be read here.

King & Spalding itself, as Paul Clement notes in his resignation, is betraying the legacy of former U.S. Attorney General Griffin Bell who, in his law school commencement address to his and my alma mater, Mercer University, said, “You are not required to take every matter that is presented to you, but having assumed a representation, it becomes your duty to finish the representation. Sometimes you will make a bad bargain, but as professionals, you are still obligated to carry out that representation.”

It is a truly sad day when a firm with a reputation like King & Spaudling’s would find it more noble to represent pro bono terrorists out to kill you, me, and them than the United States House of Representatives in defense of a law.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

5 Comments Leave a comment

It didn't take him long to find a new job

bk (Diary) Monday, April 25th at 11:51AM EDT (link)

http://global.nationalreview.com/dest/2011/04/25/aul_clement_joins_bancroft_press_release.pdf

He joins founding partner Viet Dinh there and apparently plans to continue the DOMA case.

I should have noted that I spotted this at NRO's the Corner -nt

bk (Diary) Monday, April 25th at 12:13PM EDT (link)

And Clement's comments, quoted by Katherine Jean Lopez

mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, April 25th at 12:47PM EDT (link)

at The Corner are stellar:

The former U.S. Solicitor General writes: “I resign out of the firmly-held belief that a representation should not be abandoned because the client’s legal position is extremely unpopular in certain quarters. . . . When it comes to the lawyers, the surest way to be on the wrong side of history is to abandon a client in the face of hostile criticism.”

He adds that the House will still have his counsel on the Defense of Marriage Act: “I would have never undertaken this matter unless I believed I had the full backing of the firm . . . Having undertaken the representation, I believe there is no honorable course for me but to complete it.”

Paul Clement is a class act. He’d make a great AG.

Change

 
 
 

Surely this isn't a big surprise

edintexas Monday, April 25th at 11:53AM EDT (link)

We have trained (at least) a generation of lawyers to be risk averse in all things. So it shouldn’t be surprising that the firm would drop representation at the first hint of “trouble”. They know the gay advocates mean business (no pun intended) and it is most likely penalty free to drop the case. Conservatives tend not to take retribution, and certainly not physical attacks.

 

Question

kmpesq (Diary) Monday, April 25th at 12:40PM EDT (link)

In New Jersey, where I practice law, the Supreme Court hands out serious punishment for lawyers and firms who dump clients for reasons other than what are explicitly spelled out in the Rules of Professional Conduct.

My question is for Erick. Erick, are you still a member of the Bar in Georgia? My second question is, if you are a member of the Bar in Georgia, have you thought about filing an ethics complaint against this firm?

If the left can bring pressure to bear and influence a law firm in dumping a client, then I think we on the right, who believe in the rule of law, should make this unscrupulous firm pay for their ethical lapses

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
Ronald Reagan

History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.
Ronald Reagan

Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
George Washington