« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Why Republicans Will Never Win the PR Battle on a Government Shutdown. And Why They Shouldn’t Care.

“Should Washington’s power diminish, reporters’ access to power would diminish. Smaller government is a deal breaker for the Washington press corps.”

Conservatives are prone to lament a liberal bias in the media. There is another bias conservatives should play more careful attention to because it affects even the more relatively unbiased analysts and reporters that exist on television, radio, and in print. It is the “good government” bias.

The good government bias’s hallmark is the exasperated sigh of the Washington press corps longing for the “adults” to have an “adult conversation” and handle gridlocked issues in Washington as “adults in the room.” In other words, principles be damned, we need government to work. This is perhaps the most common press bias because it chooses to ignore or downplay real principled concerns in favor of practical, pragmatic, or “adult” solutions.

Republicans in Washington are scrambling trying to find a plan to stave off a government shutdown and reduct the debt to GDP ratio while looking like “adults” to placate a critical press. It won’t happen. The GOP is so fearful of a government shutdown and the media’s spin that the Democrats will be able to cajole them into doing less than they should.

One of the ideas making the rounds is Senator Bob Corker’s CrAP Act. The CrAP Act would restrain government growth at 23% of GDP, which is higher than historic norms even into the Bush Administration. Corker, through accounting sleight of hand, says it is really 20% of GDP, but that, like his Act, is crap.

It is, however, all done in the name of good government and bipartisanship in an effort to slow the growth of government without a government shutdown. Republicans need to understand that they will never ever win a PR battle on a government shutdown with the media, but they shouldn’t fear that. Winning a PR battle with the media is no longer necessary to win the hearts and minds of the American public.

But to understand why the GOP won’t win a PR battle is to understand how the Washington press works and is to understand precisely why the GOP so often comes off as the stupid party selling its soul for larger government.

One of the old sayings in Washington is that there are two parties — the stupid party and the evil party. Occasionally the stupid party and evil party will get together and do something that is both stupid and evil and it will be hailed as a bipartisan compromise. The media is complicit in this because just about every bipartisan compromise gets referred to as the adults coming together in a room.

The most recent conversation about the 2011 continuing resolution is a case in point. Analysts and reporters talked about the “far right” and the “far left” and how John Boehner and Barack Obama would have to overcome those extremes to find a bipartisan solution. The simpleness of the conversation ignored the very real concerns by both liberals and conservatives related to spending priorities and the size of government.

More troubling for conservatives, good government rarely, if ever, can also be limited government. Despite the federal constitution being a constitution of limit power for Washington, the nation has evolved to consider Washington the center of power. It is reflected in a class of political analyst and reporter in Washington who believes themselves to be covering the corridors of power. The conversation rarely occurs among the press corps that perhaps Washington should not be doing something or its power to act is limited. The very notion is silly in the twenty-first century despite what the Constitution may or may not say.

Consequently, instead of treating the concerns of those who want more limited government seriously, they are assigned the label of “far right” and definitionally excluded when mentioning “adults” having conversations to fix Washington. Should Washington’s power diminish, reporters’ access to power would diminish. Smaller government is a deal breaker for the Washington press corps.

This should not, however, matter to Republicans. A recent CBS News survey found that 70% of Americans oppose raising the debt ceiling even if it means higher interest rates. The vast majority of Republicans and Independent voters oppose raising the debt ceiling. Surprisingly, just under half of Democrats oppose raising the debt ceiling too. Meanwhile, any casual review of reporting on the debt ceiling will find that all the adults think the debt ceiling needs to be raised.

In essence, the media and the Democrats are both stuck in 1995 when the GOP lost the PR battle to a media highlighting boy scouts shut out of the National Air and Space Museum. But the public has moved on to recognize the problem. Likewise, the public’s trust of the media continues to fall to new lows.

The GOP should not be afraid of the media’s spin and bias on this because the public has largely tuned out the routine pooh-poohing and pining for adults by the media. Instead of worrying about PR, the GOP should worry about reducing the size and scope of the federal government, which more and more polls show Americans want.

COMMENTS

  • NeoKong

    The one that ran in 2010 on reducing the budget and cutting spending and keeping Democrats in check or the one we have now that could only seem to cut less than 1% of the budget for a CR and still gets punked by the White House…?
    I only ask because the one I have seen lately seems to have no desire to draw any line in the sand over anything or live up to the lofty promises made on the campaign trail.
    They seem to have an overwhelming desire to be reasonable and get manipulated by the state run media fairly easily.
    They certainly do not seem to like all these new members rocking the boat with all their radical talk of budget cutting.

  • dajeeps

    Don’t get me wrong. It is better than out of control spending. But what we are living through right now is the result of out of control government, not spending, per se. Just imagine Jefferson or Madison musing about setting limits on government based on performance of the national economy and you can see how ridiculous what GOP is doing seems to me.

    We can’t get on the right track and back to personal liberty without getting onto the right track. If we don’t get onto the right track we will stay on the wrong one, and of course I’m sure we all understand that it means inevitable collapse because the money issues are only side effects of the structural distortions in markes and our economy from the centralized administrative state that has evolved in place of our constitution. Those will not go away under the CrAP Act, BBA or any other supposed fix currently under consideration.

  • realskinny

    A conservative Republican expecting fair reporting from the Propaganda Media is comparable to a German Jew expecting objectivity from Herr Goebbels.

    Aside from the DOD, The Democrats are monolithically opposed to ANY spending restraint. The intransigence of the Democrats can be compared to the tantrum of a small child, lying on the floor, kicking and screaming. The President’s speeches are so filled with obvious lying demagoguery, clips from them can be used in an anti-Obama Ad.

    No comment on this appears in the media. Instead they try to cover for the Democrats by parroting the preposterous claim there is no spending or debt problem. Taxes just need to be higher “on the rich”. And to live within our means is an Extremist and Radical position!

    You are right. The Republicans should ignore the media and listen to their constituents. In any event, the collapse of the Dollar is fast approaching. The Republicans should be positioning themselves to avoid any of the blame.

  • mriggio

    for years now that the Republicans should forget about both the Dems and the media because no matter what you say or do, they’re never going to like you anyhow. (I suppose Lindsay Graham is the exception, but I was speaking of actual, you know, conservative Republicans.)

    I caught a snippet of Fox’s Greta attempting to get Congressman West to walk back his remarks about Obama behaving like a third world dictator; didn’t work, he doubled-down. Now we just need to find about 200 more like him….

  • luvnthebigsites

    The first white house press corps assembly for the next conservative president will go like this: The new WH press secretary will introduce the president to the podium… “Thank you all for coming ladies and gentleman” “The following news organizations and reporters will, after this day, have their credentials revoked and are explicated from these briefing’s for the remainder of my two terms in office”. (president reads long list off here) “They will be replaced by citizen journalists and bloggers on a rotating basis.” “The American people deserve to be informed with facts based on the truth, not lies based on your bias”

    Thank you all, And God Bless America.

  • earlgrey

    not the Washington Press Corpse.

    I will be joining the lunch protest at my congresswoman’s office on Thursday. She voted against the CR bill, so it won’t be as much a protest, but a show of support.

  • junkbondtrader41

    Without endorsing Corker’s bill, which sounds much worse than Simpson-Bowles or anyhting I’ve heard taking shape in the Gang of 6, there is a certain “detatchedness” to this post. By that I mean, this isall something you’re engaging as a spectator: like a sports event, a movie, or something where you’re a coach or director, trying to guide it to your preferred ending, and not something that poses a huge threat in real life.

    It’s almost as if your primary worry is a lament about the GOP’s PR fears, and how they will “appear,” and how limted government conservatives are “portrayed,” and how some “principles” might be bargained away for “govenrment to work.” All of this to the point that one might actually forget this is all just a process in seeking a solution to an ACTUAL PROBLEM. If you prefer, a bona fide crisis, that has got to be solved. Now! Meaning, “government has to work.”

    Politics is not your own personal high school play for which you’ve been named director. There will be harsh, real-world consequences here if we don’t actually address this debt problem, Erick!

    I am frankly fed up with the “purer-than-thou” mindset, of which you are a prime example, counseling the movement, “NO COMPROMIISSSE!!! Primary the rascals! Let’s fight it out in the next election! And if we lose, we’ll go down in flames on principle!” We have been doing this for too long. And every time we kick the debt can to the next election, the results will be tragically predictable, and repeatable. Until the day arrives when have a Senate composed of 50 Rand Pauls and 50 Marco Rubios, and the ghost of Calvin Coolidge as President, you are NOT GOING TO GET EVERYTHING YOU WANT.

    If you cannot figure that out, you are not an “adult” and you frankly should get the same treatment Grover Norquist is getting from Senator Coburn.

  • Aaron Gardner
  • red_oakster

    The GOP leadership fear that independent voters will puish them for a shutdown. I assume that their polling bears this out because the the actual defections from the leadership has been tiny thus far.

  • junkbondtrader41

    Were supposed to lead to something germaine to the argument I was making, I don’t see it. Linking to specific posts would be helpful, if that’s what you were going for.

  • Aaron Gardner
  • NeoKong

    A year and a half from now….?

    The reason they have their old jobs back is because the independents fell for their fiscal hawk song and dance.
    Once again when they have the upper hand they pander to voters who will never vote for them.
    They rode in on a Tea Party wave and now they are too embarrassed to stand with them in front of Chris Matthews and Katie Couric.
    It sort of makes you feel like a sucker.

  • YnotNOW

    This is politics, after all, and we have to get votes in order to elect conservatives and govern. But you are right that this should not trump principles, and that there are other ways of getting the message out.

    So yes, we have to deal with the media and answer their bias, but should not cave to them, any more than we should cave to Democrats. And rather than expect their “support” or sympathetic coverage, we must anticipate the bias and spin, and counter with the message of Truth.

  • YnotNOW

    This is politics, after all, and we have to get votes in order to elect conservatives and govern. But you are right that this should not trump principles, and that there are other ways of getting the message out.

    So yes, we have to deal with the media and answer their bias, but should not cave to them, any more than we should cave to Democrats. And rather than expect their “support” or sympathetic coverage, we must anticipate the bias and spin, and counter with the message of Truth.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    I will go further than Erick.
    Yes, the media WILL blame the GOP for any shutdown.
    And yet, it WILL also benefit the GOP in 2012.

    Why?
    - It will highlight that there are irreconcilable differences between the parties on spending. Saw the latest poll numbers on spending more vs less? A 2 to 1 winner for the GOP.
    - No matter what the media spin, the PUBLIC WILL BLAME BOTH SIDES. And that will hurt incumbents overall. Which incumbents? hmmmm, 23 Dem Senators and a President for one. Let them walk the plank for ‘we had to shut down the govt because the GOP wouldnt agree to spend enough”
    - Like 1996, the shutdown will not cost us the Congressional majority. The people in the districts want their congresscritter to go to bat for them.
    - Unlike 1996, we are unlikely to nominate a Congressional leader for President. That means the GOP nominee (probably and ex- or current Governor) can act like the adult in the room. Let Boehner and Obama slug it out, the GOP nominee will be above it all.

    In short, a Government shutdown is not bad for the GOP. People will see it for what it is, partisan squabbling on both sides, and will not mind that the GOP is sticking up for what they ran on – fiscal responsibility. In the meantime, it will expose Obama’s truly extreme non-leadership and massive spending habits. So if Obama’s failure to come to terms with GOP on FY2012 or on the debt ceiling increase leads to a blowup – it reflects on HIM. Thus, it probably is a WINNER for the GOP in that it will help un-elect Obama.

  • drfredc

    ?Should Washington?s power diminish, reporters? access to power would diminish. Smaller government is a deal breaker for the Washington press corps.”

    Yep, that’s why I call them the PRESSSSident. The PRESSSSident thinks they are in charge, especially when someone as weak as Obama in in the WH…. Most any issue the PRESSSident wants to make, Obama will go along with….

  • darkmit

    Is he insane? That’s the current problem right now, spending is at 23-24% of GDP and we just do not generate that revenue through taxation. The worse part is that we have never generated that type of revenue. Hauser’s Law shows that since 1946, regardless of the taxation rate, the amount of revenue from taxation has hovered right at 19.5%. This is apparently shown by actual facts versus the belief held by so many on the left.

    I find this very interesting because this fits right into what I have been preaching to my colleagues about the U.S. Government budgeting process, and I use that term loosely because it’s not really a budget but a wish list.

    Lets make it a true budget. Washington should get 19.5% of the last year’s GDP and fit the spending into that, period. If Washington wants more money then adopt policies that increase GDP.

  • jlsankot

    Please and Thank you.

  • ag8tor

    What do the “R”s expect if they get a majority and continue business as usual? ATTACK! Damn the “D”s and the press. They aren’t going to say anything positive about conservatives anyhow! This creep in the WH already has a billion in his war chest for 2012. He doesn’t need half that much because the media will play him up as the second coming while villifying any conservative that runs. Look what they did to Palin. It’s time someone besides Trump manned up and took the offensive. We don’t need to even try to get another McCain elected. Forget reaching across the aisle. Pelosi and Reid have shown time and again they want to rub our noses in it. I hate to say it but the high road in politics is for losers. Time to get down and dirty. I’d rather not but the voters have shown that they buy that sort of crap. They elected a crap salesman!

  • gunslingr45

    don’t feel like a sucker, I feel like getting even.

  • audax
  • audax
  • arthurmanger17

    Right on Erick, I couldn?t have said it?wait, I did make your point about the national press in a post April 20th titled A Third Party Why?.
    Words have meaning, so if a nationalist reporter is on the air talking about the ?federal government? more than likely they are of the nationalism mindset. This brings me to two words capitalist and capitalism, ism denotes a belief system, ist denotes a practitioner. Capital = assets = worth, if converted into a medium of exchange you get money. Karl Marx in Das Kapital argued that selling ones labor for money, (capital) was demeaning which allowed the capitalist the ability to take advantage of the worker, which gives us the definition of capitalism. So we hear nonsense like, we live in a capitalist society or we believe in capitalism as opposed to communism or socialism. In reality our constitution was written to protect private property, (our labor, thoughts, ingenuity) and the ability to exchange it for others property freely, (free enterprise). What?s at stake in the battle between free enterprise and communism or socialism is not capital but freedom. Which an all powerful nationalist government can not and will not guarantee. We understood that even 200 plus years ago.

  • joetentpeg

    “It’s the Economy Stupid.” Why can’t the GOP bang simple talking points until the media/public gets it (and forces the media to cover it) like the Dems. They need a crash course from Frank Luntz on using coordinated, simple, quick, hard hitting sound bites instead of words like “egregious”, “draconian”, and “demagogue” for Walmart shoppers.

    When Boehner et al state that it’s the Dems who are really killing old folks (death panels), and starving kids, it will force the media to cover the issue truthfully, or at least discuss both sides’ views if Repubs/Dems are saying the same thing.

    Where are the Lee Atwaters of the GOP who know how to put the Dems on defense by using Willie Horton type ads?