« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Horse Race for This Week

I think I’ll start doing this every week. The feedback, both from you guys and from others who are trying to keep up with the pulse within the conservative grassroots has been very positive. Feel free to disagree. I’m just giving you my honest take on where I see the 2012 horse race right now.

Last week I took a bit of heat from Dan Riehl and a few others for failing to list Bachmann. With a dozen or so candidates in the race it is getting hard to keep up with them all and it was simply a matter of forgetting, not disliking her.

So, to make the conspiracy theorists happy, I’ll start doing these in alphabetical order.


Michele Bachmann

Michele Bachmann will apparently declare her bid for the Presidency this week. She’s going to excite perhaps the most excitable bit of the base not already enthused by Herman Cain. Like with Palin, she’ll have to overcome the myth that she is stupid, which I think she can do in short order. Friends who know her better than I do say she is a quick study.

Given her besting of Paul Ryan in response to President Obama’s State of the Union this year, she’ll do well on the stump and it would not surprise me if she, out of the box, gives the most “numbers” oriented pitch instead of big themes. Look for Republican colleagues to start a whisper campaign against her. They are both jealous of the affection the tea party movement has for her and also are not supportive.

Herman Cain

He will announce for the Presidency this Saturday, May 21, 2011, in Atlanta at Centennial Olympic Park. A Daily Caller tracking poll has Cain surging into a solid position to the point where he can no longer be easily dismissed by critics as a fringe candidate. With Huckabee now completely out, I continue to believe Cain is going to be a candidate Huck’s Army could rally to. He has the outsider credentials, the evangelical street cred, and the messaging.

Others are going to start attacking Cain as being great with a one liner, but shallow on policy. He’s going to need to start focusing on the policy. In some sense, Cain does know the policy, but he presents it so simply and in a way the press isn’t used to, they take over simplification in a pitch to the public as actual policy shallowness.

Mitch Daniels

If he gets in, he is going to be the serious contended against Mitt Romney, but he will also not be a shoo-in like some think.

His problem is going to come from a couple areas. First, conservatives are already deeply distrustful of him personally. And right now, the “he’s not one of us” is more signal while the “have you seen his actual record” rebuttal is more noise. He has a great record. But his tin ear of late with conservatives and the continuous dribble of new YouTube clips is hurting him.

Second, I think Mitt Romney is right now the front runner and the race will rapidly shape up to be a Romney vs. Daniels death match to prove who is the wonkier reformer. The buzz for Daniels has been so strong for so long, it has given Romney and others plenty of time to get their ammo loaded for the moment Daniels gets in. In fact, I suspect we’re already seeing the fruits of Romney’s operation at work.

If Daniels gets in and does not seemingly play nice with broad spectrum conservatives, there will be a real push to draft another candidate. Daniels’ entry and how he accomplishes it does, I think, set or open up the list of candidates. If he does it well, we’ve got our slate. If he rocks the boat with social conservatives too much, there’ll still be a willingness for more.

Newt Gingrich

I don’t think we’ve seen such a terrible entry into a Presidential Primary since Ted Kennedy failed to answer Roger Mudd’s question, “Why are you running for President?” The statements on Sunday’s Meet the Press and the subsequent retreat have signaled a level of disarray in the campaign.

But anyone who thinks Gingrich is out of this is out of their mind. Gingrich has staying power on name brand alone. There are a lot of people not yet paying attention. And while it may make it tougher for him and certainly gives him the “loser of the week” award for this week, this week is not the race. The most interesting thing about his unforced errors was seeing long time conservative pundits come out after Gingrich. That suggests to me he has very few friends among conservative opinion makers willing to carry his water. And that will hurt him if he can’t rebuild bridges there.

Jon Huntsman

As much I wish otherwise, keep your eye on Huntsman. For all the talk that Mitch Daniels is the media’s darling, Huntsman is the real media darling. John Weaver, his and McCain’s consultant, is a master of media generated imagery of positive candidate press. It may all be fluff pasted to bull, but it gets out there.

There is, however, a level of silliness about the candidate wanting to be both Ambassador to China and Governor of Utah while buying a house in Washington and running a race from Disney World. Certainly it is convenient to be in the Eastern Time Zone, but Utahan with a D.C. address whose running a campaign from Orlando signals a great level of manufacturing an inauthenticity.

Gary Johnson

He and Ron Paul will go nowhere except at each others’ throats competing for the slim pickings of college students not too stoned to stay home and libertarian voters too ashamed to vote libertarian. It will amount to a lot of hot air and the aggravation equivalent of termites and lice, but in the end, actual primary election days will function like turpentine to the scalp of the Republican Primary.

Sarah Palin

Palin remains the absolutely wild card now with Huckabee gone. If Palin comes in, she fundamentally redefines the race. She’ll draw from Santorum’s crowd, Cain’s crowd, Pawlenty’s crowd, and especially Bachmann’s. It’s too soon to tell her full impact, but I do think if she gets in, she winds up helping Mitch Daniels by drawing fire away from him to her.

People fear this woman. They should. She aims to win.

Ron Paul

See Gary Johnson above.

Tim Pawlenty

Pawlenty is the guy I’m keeping my eye on. He’s holding his fire, keeping his head down, and working hard to raise money. His money is going to be one of the things I’m most interested in seeing. The conventional wisdom is that he is not doing a bang up job. Relatedly, he has low name identification. When Daniels gets in, it will suck a good bit of oxygen out of Pawlenty’s flame, but I think it will also draw away a lot of attacks from Pawlenty that would otherwise be there.

Keep your eye on this one as he continues to intentionally float under the radar.

Mitt Romney

Romney is the front runner, but arguably is going to start having a harder time after that healthcare speech. That’s one reason I think the Romney camp made such a big deal out of his Las Vegas, NV take of $10+ million. Most of that money was already scheduled to come in prior to the healthcare speech. Future events are going to be a better estimate of what the healthcare speech did to him.

He’s still the odds on favorite to win right now just because of name ID. He does not have terrible negatives. If his campaign is able to take out Mitch Daniels as the wonk, he’s on a good glide path to victory. But he’ll have to keep an eye on Huntsman who has capital to spend, hates Romney, and wants to beat him. Huntsman may turn more into Huckabee than Cain in the sense he stays in the race just to hurt Romney.

Rick Santorum

I still don’t see him making it to Iowa, but he is pulling in voters who were with Huckabee largely on the strength of his social conservative credentials. Left-wing media attacks on his prior statements are only helping him.

But he is still going to have to overcome the stigma of losing his Senate seat in a swing state in a year Obama was not on the ballot. Likewise, coming from the Senate continues to be a drain on Republicans. I continue to have a hard time trying to figure out exactly why Santorum is in the race.

If Palin gets in, I think Santorum’s run ends sooner rather than later. Without her, he’s got some basic staying power, but I don’t think he’ll have the funds to compete effectively.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • gawken

    so could you please,… PRETTY PLEASE,..arrange one with Ron Paul next…maybe you can get him to fold his tent also..

  • gawken

    so could you please,… PRETTY PLEASE,..arrange one with Ron Paul next…maybe you can get him to fold his tent also..

  • http://www.reddogreport.com reddogreport

    Rick Santorum will certainly make it to Iowa and beyond.

    The former Senator knows he has no real chance of winning the nomination, but if he can stay on the ballot through South Carolina or Florida, somebody may consider Santorum for the #2 spot.

    Serving 8 years as VP is the only way Rick makes it to the White house.

    Brian O’Connor
    RedDogReport.com

  • redneck_hippie

    True, to the extent that politicians are usually creatures of perception, not reality.

    Also an indictment of our politics. To me, Daniels has proven to be a “speak softly but carry a big stick” governor who is rightly admired by his peers and constituents for turning his state around from being a basketcase to running in the black with a reserve fund. As far as the wedge issues go, he’s beat back the collectivists by helping elect Repuclicans and signing anti-union, anti-tax, anti-abortion legislation into law. The rhetoric is the noise, not the record.

    People who look for sturm and drang have moved on to other candidates that please them more. I like a man who makes a plan, campaigns on that plan, and does what we the people expect him to do. Which is be a consistently conservative, hard-working public servant.

  • chihank

    Trump’s 15 minutes of political fame showed that the race is very fluid.

    In April, Trump was a contender. In May, Trump started to sink and quit before things got even worse for him.

    As for Newt, I say wow. Talk about a quick implosion. Lucky for Newt, not many people are paying attention right now.

    Overall, the 2012 primary is anybody’s game.

  • acat

    I mostly kid. Buddy is running, but it looks to this cat like he’s in for the same reason Roland Burris was a U.S. Senator – the retirement benefits are great.

    Serioiusly, this is a good “feel of the race”, Erick, and much appreciated.

    I can’t help but think that Johnson going at Paul is a Good Thing for libertarian-leaning conservatives, and the non-brain-dead (chemically or otherwise) libertarians who want a smaller government, but don’t want a lunatic in charge. Not that I hold any hope for Johnson getting traction, so long as he and Ron Paul can be tied around one anothers’ necks like mutual albatrosses….

    As for Newt, I am sure he won’t just go away, but his biggest weakness was and remains his ego. If he can’t find a campaign manager who can successfully squelch his more .. immature outbursts.. he’s going to have trouble. The Tiffany & Co. thing is also not going to help; sooner or later, someone’s going to ask him what a gallon of milk costs .. he’d better know.

    Mew

  • chihank

    Hugh Hewitt and some folks at National Review say that Herman Cain is not worth talking about. This guy has great potential. Cain is a Donald Trump with proven conservative cred and better businessman than Trump.

    I hope Cain participates in more debates to shake up the field.

  • LibertarianHawk

    All my life I’ve been taught to pay more attention to what people do than to what they say — doubly so in politics.

    Yet, in this case, it’s apparently the opposite. Forget the record, focus on the words. That’s what Romney needs, after all. Because if people focus on his record more than his words….

    I get what Erick’s saying. And I suspect there’s a slight bit of lobbying behind the comment, even if it’s unintentional.

    But we’ve really entered la-la land if we’ve come to a point where a governor with Mitch Daniels’ record — one which conservatives should be thrilled with — can be cast aside as a RINO.

    Apparently, we care more about conservative rhetoric than conservative government.

  • akafroman

    “Cain does know the policy, but he presents it so simply and in a way the press isn?t used to, they take over simplification in a pitch to the public as actual policy shallowness.”

    In future debates, Cain needs to walk a fine line- eloquently stated by Einstein:
    “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simple.”

  • glaucon

    It really seems that the list this year is about each candidate having a couple of “good” stances, yet no one is the complete package.

    (I do have a soft spot for Bachmann, especially after her CPAC speech. ;) )

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    Just making the point that a lot of people, self-indicting myself in this one, have been paying attention to the soundbites and haven’t really paid attention to his record.

    And his record is what should be weighed and his record isn’t bad.

    But the soundbites pour salt on wounds for many social conservatives.

  • oldbird77

    I had to google Roemer just to see who he is. . . and I like to think of myself a pretty plugged in. Guess I need to up my game.

  • rcatheart

    eh…She’s trying to be Sarah Palin 2.0. She’ll get slaughtered in the general.

    Plus I have this sense that the thing she’s most interested in is herself.

  • chihank

    Mitch Daniels will apparently give a firm Yes or No answer in June in regards to running.

    While, i don’t like his Truce comments, if you put the rhetoric aside, Daniels was endorsed by the IN Right to Life in his two elections for governor. Also, Daniels signed a bill cutting funds to Planned Parenthood. No other GOP Governor in recent time has the guts to do that. Most pro-life GOP Governors are unwilling to cut funds becuase of the all out assault from the media and pro-choice lobby. Daniels did that. Daniels deserves a conservative profile in courage award.

  • 20jan2013

    I look forward to your continued weekly updates.

    By the way, the comment titles aren’t showing on the main pages anymore (for me, at least). Bummed about that.

  • redneck_hippie
  • LibertarianHawk

    And it makes sense that Romney and his folks would want to propagate these things as much as possible.

    I’m pretty confident, though, if people focus on deeds more than words, record more than rhetoric, it’ll make a choice between the two a pretty easy one.

    Romney’s had to walk back quite a bit of his own record (not to mention words). Daniels stubbornly refuses to do that — largely because he doesn’t have too many actions for which to apologize. And the words that people want him to apologize for were spoken with a reason.

    I like Mitt Romney — and supported him in 2008. But Daniels is a bona fide star, IMO. He’d make for a better candidate than many people seem to think. And I suspect he’d be an outstanding president.

  • LibertarianHawk

    …about this particular presidential campaign — and that will distinguish it from earlier campaigns — is that the Republican candidate is going to have to be somebody who can bridge the gap between the Republican establishment and the Tea Party contingent.

    The latter is not at all wed to the GOP. Some of them may show up to vote for whoever the party nominates. But many of them will not — and they don’t care a bit if it means helping the Democrats.

    I think that’s a healthy force — but it’s a dangerous one for Republicans.

    While I support Gov. Daniels and think he would be OK in this regard, I actually think the candidate best suited to appeal to both sides of that divide would be Gov. Pawlenty.

  • Finrod

    The Einstein line actually ends with “but not simpler”, which changes the meaning significantly.

  • Finrod

    Sure yeah, in general it’s better to focus on the record and not the words. However, if it wasn’t for Newt Gingrich shoving his foot in his mouth up to the knee, Daniels’ comments would have caused him to have the worst week of anyone running or potentially running.

    Everyone wants a president that can get stuff done, but nobody wants a president that is often dining on shoe leather, and that seems to be Daniels’ most common meal of late.

  • http://www.reddogreport.com reddogreport

    Seems that Mitch talks like a Centrist, but walks like a Conservative.

    Brian O’Connor
    RedDogReport.com

  • cordpt

    I wasn’t aware of Daniels producing any sort of controversial comments this week or in the recent past.

  • LibertarianHawk

    He hasn’t been terribly gaffe-prone here. Of course, you can’t compare the two media microscopes.

    And the bulk of what are considered “gaffes” in this instance, anyway, don’t seem so much like things he wishes he wouldn’t have said, but things that some people would just as soon not hear.

    We’d better get used to that — and the same goes for Democrats. Fixing this debacle in front of us is probably going to require a lot of us to hear things we’d rather not hear.

  • nvrepub

    nt

  • earlgrey

    soundbites without really knowing his record.

  • http://www.redstate.com/jcrestonm jcrestonm

    What is the latest on the ‘Stache?

    I was expecting him to be in the 2012 race as well.

  • sandbun

    I’d agree that RP and Gary Johnson hurt each other’s nomination chances, except how do you hurt 0%? I was actually expecting them to become a debate tag-team, with both of them working together to take down anyone they don’t like. ’08 RP stuck out like a sore thumb, having another person there agreeing with him could help him look more mainstream in the debate, and if they’re goal is just to move the debate their direction it could be affective. But I was surprised that they didn’t really do that in the first debate, although everyone on the stage seemed to be pulling their punches. Be interested seeing if that changes.

    I don’t get the appeal of Bachmann as a candidate – your friends may say what they like but she’s been a gaffe machine in the short time she’s been a news-maker. And her earmark beliefs- “I hate earmarks, they’re terrible! Wait, you say that money for those projects that I like for ARE earmarks? Well, then those shouldn’t be considered earmarks, because I want to be a person who both gets earmark money for my district and is known as someone who is opposed to earmarks.”

    I’m also confused about how Cain has continued to get a pass on his support for TARP from those on this site.

  • Darin_H

    and I don’t read him, nor listen to him anymore.

  • sailingaway

    According to the CNN poll released May 5, 2011 Ron Paul polls better against Obama than any other GOP candidate, including Romney and Huckabee (who was next closest.) That would seem to mean he picks up a lot more voters than stoners.

    In fact, between spin cycles (election years) Ron Paul is known for speaking on the economy and monetary policy and not on drugs. Drugs is Gary Johnson’s big issue. The two are not really alike, to me, at all, but I come at this as a lifelong Republican, not a libertarian, and Johnson is too liberal for my taste. Ron Paul is a paleoconservative Constitutionalist who believes in American sovereignty, something I don’t see any emphasis with from GJ (but I could be wrong, I don’t know all that much about Johnson).

    Putting the two together, in my opinion, is this elections version of marginalizing Ron Paul with GOP primary voters.

    You know better.

  • azaeroprof

    As a fence straddler (elected party official and someone who “pals around” with Tea Party folks), I can assure you that there is a large contingent of folks out there who, as much as they dread 4 more years of Obama, will have no qualms about “punishing” the GOP if it is seen as continuing to ignore the conservative movement.

    If we nominate a Romney, Huntsman, Gingrich, or someone equally seen as “establishment”, I shudder to think what happens to the country and the party I love. I am working hard in my little neck of the woods to bridge the gap.

  • Bill S
  • cpaguy

    No Thanks!

  • cpaguy

    No Thanks!

  • phenry

    and perhaps the reason that Trump even considered a run, is that the GOP primary functions much like The Apprentice. It is a game of elimination until it gets down to two or three candidate. People like Palin and Pawlenty who keep their heads down, work hard, and don’t say negative things about other candidates are the ones to watch. They will have staying power while weaker candidates are eliminated. Romney, on the other hand, is the John Rich of the primary – a strong player throughout. The Palin’s and Pawlenty’s will make their move to challenge him at the end. At that point, it’s anyone’s guess as to how the chips fall.

  • trutexan

    We can’t be like sports fans. “Yeah maybe McNabb threw the winning pass but it wasn’t a tight spiral so it was lousy to watch.” Absolutely NOBODY is going to have the complete package. And if conservatives don’t watch out, we’ll pick each other apart and give the liberal media plenty of ammo to make the ignorant un-read public disregard all the stupid stuff the current administration has done.

    Let’s take Perry for instance. I was vehemently opposed to the TransTexas Corridor (it would run right through my land) and at the time, I just couldn’t stand the fact that this arrogant politician was going to pay a foreign company to build a toll road with no-build restrictions on either side of it for the next 50 years. It was eminent domain run amok. But I held my nose and voted for him in this last election because his democratic opponent turned Houston into a sanctuary city.

    Consider that just the presence of Perry is enough to send a streak of fear through the liberal Dems. His pressing that letter into Obama?s hand at the airport in Austin was priceless. That took what we call ?chon-es? and it was beyond impressive. There will be millions of Southern Democrats who will vote for this Texan feeling like they are getting some sort of redemption because the current democrat they helped put into office is such a miserable disappointment. They blindly voted for a democrat without realizing they were voting for socialism. The buyer?s remorse is rampant and the approval numbers show it.

    On a national level, I like Perry on the ticket. Sure, he?s a politician and he?s got baggage just like all of them. But he is our absolute best bet to win. He?s strong, solid, charismatic, a Christian, pro-life, supported by the Tea Party, knows all about the border problems & the effects of illegal immigration, a proponent for home-grown energy, and the economic record of Texas in the current economy shows he knows how to create a capitalistic pro-business environment that can get this country back on its feet. Perfect? No. Electable? Yes. And he?ll beat the pants off Obama. I have to consider that most important. I?m going to put aside my own personal feelings from the TTC memories and put the best interest of my country first. The guy or gal who is elected president, has a lot of un-doing ahead. And this time, I?d vote for Perry without holding my nose. Will somebody please get him to run?

  • lineholder

    I noticed that you put a comment in there about broad spectrum SoCons under Daniels’ name. I can’t answer for others in this group, but I personally really don’t see it as being about whether or not Daniels’ “plays nice”. His comment about “putting social issues on the back burner” was pretty broad and rather vague. At this point, I don’t really have any way of knowing exactly what social issues he is referencing because he hasn’t clarified it. That’s one of the reasons I’ve said that I wanted to wait for the debates before making a commitment.

    There are plenty of broad spectrum social issues that could be considered, but two of them are very high-profile right now…education and immigration. If the issues come up in debate and Daniels takes a stand of “I’m putting social issues on the back burner”, hey that’s his choice. His record on education and his position on immigration become a mute point. Not because of any bias on my part but because he has placed self-imposed limitations on addressing those issues.

    If another candidate comes on strong where these kinds of social issues are concerned, I definitely will consider what they have to say. I think you have pegged that response accurately.

    But it isn’t just my own portion of social politics that I’m looking at. Go one step to the left, of social moderates, and a greater portion of this group is trending to the right than it might seem, particularly among blacks and legal immigrants. The employment rate in this group of citizens is very low. There are 8 million working illegal immigrants they are finding themselves competing with just to get any job. Obama’s admin keeps talking about passing DREAM Act, and for this group of social moderates…well, they are trending more to the conservative side they have in the past on the issue of immigration. For them, it is both a social and fiscal issue, given the circumstances they are facing.

    I look at that and see a door of opportunity for our side. And then I look at a candidate like Daniels who has the conservative credentials that might persuade this group to vote Repub in 2012. But he stays within these self-imposed limitations he set up???

    Yeah, I do question the logic of it in this case. And not just for myself either.

  • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

    And I hope that all Repubs will take your first paragraph to heart.

  • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

    …that the “social issues” being referred to are abortion and same-gender “marriage.” It’s always the sex stuff that makes people squirm.

  • lineholder

    I’m probably going have to hear it coming from the man himself, heartlander.
    I appreciate your input, though, so thanks.

  • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

    …something’s amiss there.

    She’s very gifted where she is — we need as many firebrands and Obamacare watchdogs as we can get in the House.

    She would stand no chance, though, against Obama.

  • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

    You’re telling me there are people who would STILL — after enduring the Marxist coup we’ve been living under for the last two years — would STILL be willing to put the final nails in the coffin of what’s left of our Republic in order to throw some spoiled-child snit-fit little temper tantrum to “punish” the GOP?!

    I’m flabbergasted. I can’t BELIEVE there are people so spiteful that they would rather destroy this country than suck it up and do what needs to be done. They would punish ALL OF US and future generations just because THEY can’t get THEIR way.

    I’m sorry, but there is NO EXCUSE for that level of immaturity and selfishness. Good grief, that’s as self-centered as Obama.

    I am ashamed for these people. And FURIOUS!!! GROW UP, people!

  • yuletide

    She has a strong chance of winning Iowa since Huckabee is out and I don’t see Palin getting in. She has one characteristic that most of field doesn’t; charisma. She is my favorite for the VP spot on the ticket

  • ayrnieu

    Whatever you think of the Republican lineup, Obama is the opposition.

    Whatever you think of a third party, that party’s Presidential bid is a statement of _vanity_ until it has a solid presence in both houses of Congress, in state government, in local government.

  • ayrnieu

    > I was actually expecting them to become a debate tag-team,

    Gary Johnson was asked about reality television and mountain climbing. Ron Paul was asked about heroin (a pressing issue for everyone! An ever-invoked pillar of his campaign!) and Bachmann.

    I wish we had debates. I wish we had debates. I wish we had debates.

  • redneck_hippie

    gets drafted, he would be head to head with Daniels for my #1 pick.

  • azaeroprof

    I’m trying to stop it. But a lot of these folks have a ton of resentment towards the GOP establishment, and the establishment types are doing their best to portray them as troublemakers and shut them out of the process. And I’m standing by doing my best Rodney King impersonation!

  • audax

    Thank YOU Erick! My words exactly:

    “…as the Palin hate (hate is too strong a word, let?s use?.fear)….”

  • jlsankot

    stated that if Palin is GOP nominee, they will vote for Obama. They claim to be Repubs.

    I was in shock as they all have children who will have to pay one way or another for all the cr_p this president has dreamed up.

    It’s not always easy to figure out people and the way they think.

  • jlsankot

    your reasoning is……?

  • eburkedisciple

    Cain has a lot to say and is very skilled in debate and delivery. I am going to enjoy having him in the discussion. I think it will improve the field!

    I am ready to have an experienced business man at the helm who has and values fiscal wisdom and is also wise on social issues.

  • eburkedisciple

    I am nearly qualified for my senior citizen’s discount and have been republican all my life but I resonate with the Tea Party disgust for Bloody Red Republicans who sought power rather than principle and were willing to compromise with the Devil to retain the vote and in the process sold our country down the river. If we are going to go down (and our former Republican leaders were taking us to the same destination as our current Dems – only slower) then by all means let us stand on principle and go down under the Dem with our heads held high.

    The Tea Party is big on accountability. Thank Goodness. Too many of our Republican leaders are not happy with accountability. My own Isackson and Chambliss better watch out.

  • eburkedisciple

    Yippee Kai A

  • LibertarianHawk

    There are a lot of people saying that about people that are too far on one side of that divide or the other.

    Nominate Palin, I’m voting for Obama.

    Nominate Romney, I’m staying home or voting Libertarian….or some such thing.

    It’s a real problem for the GOP — and they need to pick their candidate wisely. It has to be somebody who can speak to both sides without scaring them off.

    As I said, I think Daniels can do that. I really do — but he’s probably more in the establishment side of the camp.

    Pawlenty, my 2nd choice, might actually be best on this score.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    or those who have SarahShrines™ in their basements have you.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    Nor should he be on the Republcian ballot or in the Republican caucus in the House. He’s not a Republican. And his supporters are raving idiots who make Obama’s kid brigade look good.

  • sundaycombo

    on Gingrich. He was always destined to self destruct given his track record of shooting from the hip but who would have thought it would happen so soon? You ARE right in that he does have a brand name. The problem is the brand is ” Contradictory positions on every issue that exist-sometimes in as little as 48 hours”. And who is his constituency anyway? Who is a Gingrich voter? Social conservatives? Tea Party members? Fiscal hawks? I sure can’t figure it out. Gov. Haley (a power player in the primaries and a very sharp lady) correctly noted recently that there was a time and place for Newt-and 2012 isn’t it.

    As for the other candidates/potential candidates I would respectfully opine that…

    Bachmann–The real dark horse in the race. Is there any doubt she has captured the folks who previously supported Palin and now realize the “mama grizzly” has no more intention of walking away from her sweet gig at Fox than Huckabee did? Has a real chance to make some noise in Iowa and South Carolina. Could end as Romney’s biggest threat when all is said and done.

    Cain—The novelty wears off fast when you realize his policy knowledge is a mile wide but only an inch deep. Must hope that Bachmann and Palin both decide to sit it out if he is to get any traction.

    Huntsman/Romney/Daniels/Pawlenty–They are all fighting for the same voter-centrists who embraced McCain in 2008. Daniels is the most hyped non-candidate since Fred Thompson and I expect he will suffer a similar fate as Fred if he decides to run. Of this group it’s Romney’s to lose and I would guess he closes the deal this time around with big wins in New Hampshire and Florida that sends the others in this group home.

    Johnson/Paul/Santorum–No chance. Only they know why they are even bothering. Ego? Boredom?

    Palin–While doing reality TV and hitting the lecture circuit, she forgot to keep an eye on the rear view mirror. Bachmann now has the buzz and the enthusiasm she took for granted. However, I also don’t think she really cares that Bachmann stole her thunder since she is NOT running. Grinding it out 7 days a week across a frozen Iowa and New Hampshire with 3-4 public appearances a day (and that day starts at 6AM and ends at 11PM) separates those that really want to be president from those that lack that single minded determination. Do YOU see her willing to do that? I didn’t think so.

    So……..As much as I hate to see it, the smart money has to be on Romney being the nominee.

  • Allen West for President – 2012

    LTC Allen West may be the complete package. I know that he is a freshman Congressman and he is reluctant to run at this time, but there is a growing groundswell of supporters from all over the country pleading with him to get into the race. We believe he is the man we need now. He has proven to be a strong leader while a Lt. Col. in the Army. He is an honorable, principled man who loves his country. I and many others out there believe that he is our modern day George Washington.

    There is a book out there about Mr. West by Dr. Richard Berry entitled “A Missing Link in Leadership: The Trial of Lieutenant Colonel Allen West. The story of a true American hero”.

    Whenever I hear Mr. West speak I get goosebumps and feel so proud to be an American. He is such an inspiration and is definitely presidential material. I never became involved in anyone’s campaign before, but I am so motivated to help Mr. West become President that I will do whatever it takes to help make that happen.

    Obama’s speech yesterday regarding the Middle East and Israel may just be the spark to bring him into the race because West is a very outspoken supporter of Israel.

    Please take the time to check out any of the videos of Mr. West on the internet and I would almost bet that you’ll be on the bandwagon to draft Allen West to become our next President, too!

  • sanderson13

    Definitely looking forward to this on a weekly basis.

    Cain is for real. Pawlenty-Cain ticket tickle anybody?

    My gut tells me Sarah stays on the sidelines and may play King-maker.

    I’d like to see Rick Perry on this list, even if it’s to say, “He’s still not in.”

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens