On Zealots and Zealotry


I want to spend some time talking about zealots and zealotry. Already, the situation is growing out of hand, and I expect it to get even worse as we head further into campaign season. The Rebecca Mansour situation yesterday was a case in point. I cannot tell you the number of people who read the Daily Caller article and still emailed me under the belief that Ms. Mansour’s email account had been hacked. Never mind her admission.

You know what I’m talking about.

Should any of you dare say anything in the slightest way critical of Sarah Palin, you will be savaged, attacked, and bloodied. The same holds true should you say anything critical of Herman Cain, Tim Pawlenty, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee, or any of the other candidates, potential candidates, or also-rans.

This is not unusual, but I think this campaign season is going to be the worst we have seen in a very long time. In 2008, the campaign was largely seen as between Mitt Romney and John McCain. The angriest partisans of the mainstream candidates belonged to Mike Huckabee as his campaign struggled to get taken seriously. When it did, the angst held on.

This year, the field is extremely wide open. Unfortunately, as in the case of every race, there are already winners and losers, front runners and also-rans shaping up. Consequently, some people are convinced that their candidate is not getting a fair shake and they have become quite angry quite early.

This is the nature of every campaign cycle magnified now by the sheer desire to beat Barack Obama at all costs. Add to this a compelling conviction by partisans of each candidate that only their candidate can beat Barack Obama and you have the recipe for instability and online disaster.

So I would like to give a word of caution about RedState. We tolerate a lot during campaign season, but I am already tired of the partisans of various candidates not defending their candidate, but choosing to attack at all costs anyone who may raise the slightest bit of criticism or concern. There are certainly those who take shots at candidates, myself included. But, by and large, I am noticing a trend where should anyone raise a concern about a particular candidate, the person raising the concern is pilloried and savaged quickly.

I would offer a word of advice should you find yourself unable to control yourself and feel compelled to attack anyone who may daresay anything you don’t like about your preferred candidate. Christ Jesus himself said to go forth and teach and baptize. Christ did not say go kill the infidel. Christ said to pray for the infidel.

The partisans of the various candidates have taken to behaving like radical jihadists instead of the Christians many of them are. It does their preferred candidate no good
and hurts their chances to pick up a skeptical, but willing to be persuaded voter.

I cannot tell you the number of times I get angry e-mail from supporters of Herman Cain who demand that I say nicer things about him that I already do. I cannot tell you the number of times I get e-mails from people who tell me raising a criticism of Sarah Palin or Tim Pawlenty or Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee is outside the bounds of any reasonable discourse simply because I do not bow prostrate before the throne of that particular candidate.

That’s not my job and that is not the purpose of this site. So let me make it clear for you — if you cannot engage constructively for or against the various candidates in the Republican primary, please go elsewhere and when in doubt, tell yourself that Christ said to go out and teach not kill those who disagree. The zealots for a candidate should strive to draw people to their candidate not drive them away through silly attacks, repeated high dudgeons, and an inability to entertain a constructive criticism towards the candidate.

None of the candidates are flawless and none of the candidates are without sin, political or otherwise. I intend, during this campaign season, to refrain from endorsing any and all candidates for president. I intend to do my level best to provide the most objective coverage I can of who is up and who is down and who is right and who is wrong in the horse race for President. One week you may like it and one week you may not.

I am happy to entertain any and all criticism, but I would ask that you do it constructively and not angrily when you disagree. And you should do that at all times with other people who might disagree with you. Zealots and their zealotry serve a purpose, but I am seeing more and more of the zealots of particular candidates doing those candidates more harm than good. Strive not to be a failed missionary and be willing to let your candidate own his or her own blame for their screw ups.

Ultimately, should you be unable to restrain yourself and refrain from unhinged zealotry devoid of any grounding in facts and reality, I would ask one simple thing besides going elsewhere. Instead of putting hand to keyboard or mouth to nonsense, hand over your credit card to your candidate and just fund them. Give your candidate money instead of being an unhinged raving lunatic in their support. You will do them more good by giving them money and not antagonizing those who may ultimately be curious about your candidate.

As moms everywhere have always said, if you cannot say anything nice don’t say it at all. And if you still can’t help yourself, fork over some cash to your candidate instead of risking a vote for your candidate because you have an inability in your defensiveness to be civil.


RSS feed

76 Comments Leave a comment

Hear, hear. -nt-

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 5:03PM EDT (link)

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

A Key to Persuading Others.

zooboy Wednesday, May 25th at 9:00PM EDT (link)

Proverbs 16:21 (New American Standard Version):

The wise in heart will be called understanding,
And sweetness of speech increases persuasiveness.

agendadocumentary.com

The conservative stool needs all 3 legs in order to stand.

Words to live by...

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 9:16PM EDT (link)

(which is a “duh,” considering it’s Proverbs…)

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 
 

I have to agree but ......

mine Wednesday, May 25th at 5:10PM EDT (link)

We are ways too harsh on each other. But I have to say that Huckabee didn’t get anything that he dish out himself. We do have to be kinder to each other.

There is a difference between honesty and grace.

acat (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 5:12PM EDT (link)

We must be honest about the candidates, as we see them.
We must treat one another with grace.
As I have been reminded.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Well said, acat (nt)

runner12 (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 10:58PM EDT (link)
 
 

Thanks Erick

paramedichess Wednesday, May 25th at 5:21PM EDT (link)

In my experience, it is the people who can’t rationally defend their positions or candidates that instead lash out with insults. Conservatism should be build on intellect, reason and fact, not on raw emotion. Let’s get excited about our candidates or issues, but let’s argue like adults, with facts and logic not insults and name-calling.

And conservatives also understand

YnotNOW (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 10:41AM EDT (link)

that all humans are flawed, and therefore cannot be trusted with too much power. That’s why our Founders set up checks and balances, and accountability to the people.

Don’t expect too much perfection from candidates or politicians.
Don’t give them too much power.
That’s why conservatism works!

YnotNOW
If not me, who? If not now, when?

 

And conservatives also understand

YnotNOW (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 10:41AM EDT (link)

that all humans are flawed, and therefore cannot be trusted with too much power. That’s why our Founders set up checks and balances, and accountability to the people.

Don’t expect too much perfection from candidates or politicians.
Don’t give them too much power.
That’s why conservatism works!

YnotNOW
If not me, who? If not now, when?

 
 

Obama is aiming for a billion in campaign ca$h

Beaglescout (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 5:23PM EDT (link)

He’s going to want to spend that cash savaging Republicans. I fully expect every conservative site to be full of infiltrators who do nothing but attack other candidates than their “picked” candidates. We may not be able to tell who they are. But they will certainly bring the level of discourse down to their level. As conservatives and republicans let’s remember two things.

1. All real conservatives and republicans agree on most things. So we’re not really enemies. Don’t treat each other as enemies.

2. The Democrats are a proxy party for the communist party. They are not an American political party. They do not have the good of America as one of their goals. They will treat we conservatives like enemies, so we need to acknowledge the morale war they are waging against us and focus on them, and their savior Princeps Barackus Kenyattus Obamai, as the real enemy.

Don’t be lured or tempted into attacking Republicans. Save your ammo for the bad guys, and there are plenty of them in the Democratic Media Complex.

“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”

–Alexander Hamilton

Good point, beagle

heartlander (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 9:07AM EDT (link)

The Left is pulling out all the stops, and they are very devious with “psy-ops.” They are all over the Internet, and if we think they’ve been insidious up to this point, we can be sure that we ain’t seen nothin’ yet. Best for us to remember Jesus’ dictum that we should be as innocent as doves — i.e., try to keep a pure heart — but as cunning as serpents, i.e., discerning enough to keep from falling into our enemies’ traps.

“The still, small voice of God in every human soul is the greatest ally of the pro-life cause, and why it will ultimately prevail.”
–Donald R. McClarey

 
 

Excellent advice...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 5:26PM EDT (link)

Now where’s my credit card? ;)

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 

Here's hoping that Red Stae NEVER needs to add an "Abuse" button..

gawken (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 6:06PM EDT (link)

but the campaign season’s just beginning…

Well, and beautifully said, Errick..

 

Fair enough

Viator Wednesday, May 25th at 6:21PM EDT (link)

I hope in turn Red State will monitor trolls, concern trolls and other time wasting effluvia. Also what is the point of people repeating the same criticism of a candidate time after time after time, ad nauseum.
That is unless they are trolls.

55555 -- and let's boot the Moby's! -nt-

rickbull Wednesday, May 25th at 10:17PM EDT (link)

WE ARE THE 53% (who actually pay taxes).

 
 

Read It Twice

refudiateobama2012 Wednesday, May 25th at 6:30PM EDT (link)

Erick, I’ve read your piece twice and I can’t think of anything that needs to be added.

As a strong Palin supporter, I have been known to respond to those who rely on the “she’s stupid” meme or the “quitter” meme. I know that when a person resorts to that tactic, they are on the losing side of the argument before they get started. I do not disparage the character of another candidate, with the exception of Jug Ears.

When I encounter a supporter of another candidate, I will listen and ask questions. When I encounter someone who attacks Palin’s character or intelligence, I usually accept their attack as a reflection on them and not Palin. Sometimes I don’t, but then realize that I’m falling into their trap. When I read the rantings of a PDSer, 95% of the time I end up letting it go. Sometimes, I fail totally and jump right into the middle of it. I guess I’m still a work in progress.

Ok, Palin IS stupid

roppongibob Wednesday, May 25th at 8:11PM EDT (link)

and we are wasting our time supporting her. If we want to win in 2012 we have to back someone who can WIN. There, you can attack all you want, but we need to win. Nicht war?

Could you tell me why....

gekster (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 8:14PM EDT (link)

you think she is stupid.
Or was that sarcasm.

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 

You don't read very well, do you?

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 8:45PM EDT (link)

This is the type of nonsense Erick wrote on. Now i can ban you right now, or you can just walk away and not say another word on this thread. Your choice.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Erick, I was thinking of this guy the whole time I read your article.

ayrnieu Wednesday, May 25th at 11:22PM EDT (link)

The person he’s replying to: “Can you tell me why you think she’s stupid?”

This guy: , .

I *laughed* when his comment was the first with “Hear, hear.” He and a few others think they’re the sheepdogs of redstate and run around calling out and smearing them for unoffensive comments. If you can whack these guys with a newspaper, I’ll say a prayer for your inbox.

"This guy:"

ayrnieu Wednesday, May 25th at 11:22PM EDT (link)

(rabid personal attack), (banning threat).

 

You might learn to read the threading.

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 11:56PM EDT (link)

I was replying to roppongibob.

And if you have issues with the moderation, send an email to the Contact link.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Correct

edintexas Thursday, May 26th at 8:58AM EDT (link)

You were replying to roppongibob and that is clear from the thread line. I’ll admit I have some problem with “Now i (sic) can ban you right now…”, this type of threat comes with some frequency from some people, though I can’t say that I recollect you being in that group.

 
 
 

Were

gunslingr45 Thursday, May 26th at 8:33AM EDT (link)

you replying to roppongibob? I hope so.

 
 
 
 

Right on

rudyardkipling Wednesday, May 25th at 6:35PM EDT (link)

Just remember Redstaters, you have a unique opportunity to actually convince relatively like-minded people here to support ‘your’ candidate (financially/volunteering/voting), by making reasoned, fact-based arguments.

But you won’t get there through ad-hominem attacks, overreaction and hyperbole.

The conservative who resists change is as valuable as the radical who proposes it. – William James ‘Will’ Durant

Moreso. -Me

 

Great message Erick,

calamityjune Wednesday, May 25th at 6:38PM EDT (link)

and I totally agree! Even though FreedomWorks has launched a huge expensive campaign to destroy Mitt Romney, we must turn the other cheek. Their intentions are honorable aren’t they!
Righhhhtttttt?

This is Redstate.

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 8:47PM EDT (link)

If you have a complaint about another organization’s tactics, take it to them. Don’t use this venue to be, well, a zealot.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Or at least write your own diary about it

Neil Stevens (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 10:46PM EDT (link)

Threadjacking to declare Jihad is not welcome.

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Even better. -nt-

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 10:55PM EDT (link)

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 
 
 

Popcorn time coming... and no mercy for Palin haters

philipjames Wednesday, May 25th at 9:43PM EDT (link)

The reason Sarah Palin supporters, myself included, have such a short fuse on any slights directed at her is very simple…

Who was defending her loudly and vocally when she was being attacked, joked about, smeared and stabbed in the back by the Republican insiders, bloggers, politicos and Washington insiders for those two years after the election?…. who stood up and defended her?
Did you? Were you loud and vocal about pushing back on all the attacks and smears? or were you one of the ones snickering in the background and making jokes too?

Lets take just one smear…. this liberal garbage that even gets repeated by some on the right about being a quitter. Where do you think the Tea Party would have gone to if Sarah had not left office, come down to the lower 48 and brought national TV attention to it and a legitimacy when the Republican Establishment was laughing at them?… who was the “cheerleader” for the Tea Party that was able to get National TV coverage during that initial period? I remember the so-called genius advisors, bloggers and politicos attached to the Republican Party downplaying those stupid people. And its easy to go back and read what everyone was saying back in 2009…. right?

So, as far as I am concerned, good for the Palin supporters. Keep it up. Its bad enough that the left attacks her every day…. its even worse that there are scumballs and slime on the right that are still doing it.

Sarah Palin will roll over all the bitchers and complainers who now realize that if she gets in, then their gaming of the system for money and power is going to be in jeopardy.

Just waiting for the movie. Popcorn time coming up.

You didn't get the message either.

Bill S (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 9:48PM EDT (link)

Go to top. Re-read. Comprehend.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 

Bottle it and save it for the general, ppl

usdebateboard Wednesday, May 25th at 10:07PM EDT (link)

We could have used it in 2008, when McCain operatives were under strict orders not to attack his opponent.

 

thank you

Maggi Cook (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 10:14PM EDT (link)

and here’s to many more robust discussions between now and next summer; and then can we all, please, kiss, make up and work our behinds off to defeat the real enemies of this country

Telling the truth in a time of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.

 

I tell you who I'm zealous about -

jdw4america (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 10:18PM EDT (link)

anybody – and I mean anybody – who will defend, preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States of America by defeating the scurrilous little creep currently occupying the White House.

I don’t care if it’s Sarah or T-Paw or Cain or Mitt or whoever. There are some I’d rather see on the ticket, and some I’d rather not see, but so help me, whoever is the GOP candidate in November 2012 is getting my vote and every single vote of every person I can get to the polls.

The time is now, because we won’t get another shot at stopping the socialists. Our nation is teetering on the brink of economic ruin and they are urging it on. We have only a short time to determine whose assets get us closer to victory, and whose defects might cause us to lose. We have to become more objective to do this.

I respectfully suggest that we all put on our big girl panties and find a way to figure out and unite behind whoever can attract the base and the independents, cause I have a feeling that it’s gonna get ugly out there, really quick.

 

If I may add

1stRichard (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 10:22PM EDT (link)

We know what we are facing so do not add any more fuel for the left

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

 

great article Erick, but you already know that

Doc Holliday (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 10:25PM EDT (link)

I have two points about the hyperpartisan hypersensitivity. The first is that if people are so unwilling to consider “their” candidates faults, and the positives of other candidates, the we as a party will not get the most out of the primary process. Our goal is to field the best candidate to beat Obama and further our conservative principles. That means these people have to compete against each other, and let the best man win, period.

My second point won’t make many people happy but it is what I believe. One of the reasons why many are so prickly and defensive is that they know their candidate IS flawed, quite possibly to an extent that they can not beat Obama. If we had someone Reaganesque, would we really have 5 or 6 camps out there warring like Italian city states? I think not. I think people are defensive, as opposed to excited, BECAUSE we have no one that stands head and shoulders above the rest; at least not at this point.

Molon Labe!

 

One meme I'd like to see ended is the 'unelectable' meme.

Finrod (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 10:45PM EDT (link)

Romney, Palin, Pawlenty, Cain, even Johnson or Luap Nor, we could elect any of these over Obama if we had to. I think it’s time we retire the ‘unelectable’ meme once and for all.

PETA and the ASPCA are pure evil. See here and here.

The six degrees of Karl Rove memes

usdebateboard Wednesday, May 25th at 10:55PM EDT (link)

Very well said Finrod,

calamityjune Thursday, May 26th at 12:26AM EDT (link)

and I agree with your list as it goes so far. Maybe other useful candidates will come forward to add to that list. Sooner or later the politics has to begin and we will do some weeding out of a few that couldn’t beat the mesiah in my opinion. Heaven help us if we don’t.

 

Truer words were never spoken, Finrod. nt

20jan2013 (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 2:53AM EDT (link)

http://archive.redstate.com/stories/the_parties/republicans/mitt_romney_lies_about_abortion

 

So, do you mean that when a candidate has a long history

mbecker908 (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 9:41AM EDT (link)

of F/U polling number that keep getting worse with specific groups of voters who are absolutely required to insure election in the primary or general, that subject should be off limits? Questions about the focus of the potential candidate’s campaign are off limits? Questions about the candidate not dealing with the issues driving the polling should be off limits?

Because there’s more than one candidate that has that problem and it happens to real as the sunrise.

Change

Obsessed much, mbecker?

Finrod (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 10:27AM EDT (link)

Perhaps you haven’t noticed, but Obama isn’t doing so well with the independents either. In fact, all the things you mentioned apply to him as well.

I truly think that any Republican candidate could beat Obama. If you’re more concerned about tearing down GOP candidates than building them up, I wonder about your focus.

PETA and the ASPCA are pure evil. See here and here.

I'm not obsessed at all Finrod. Just trying to

mbecker908 (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 10:33AM EDT (link)

figure out what “you” think the “rules” should be. And as for Obama not doing well, I’d remind you that GWB wasn’t doing so well at this point in the cycle in 2004. Dems thought the same thing and nominated Kerry.

My focus is simple, I want a candidate with a solid conservative record, solid experience and the ability to actually get something done with respect to the major issues.

Change

You can't always get what you want

Finrod (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 2:42PM EDT (link)

My focus is simple, I want a candidate with a solid conservative record, solid experience and the ability to actually get something done with respect to the major issues.

I don’t see ANY candidates in the race or even potentially in the race that meet all three of your desires. So the question becomes: what do you overlook in order to get a candidate you’re comfortable with?

PETA and the ASPCA are pure evil. See here and here.

You weight them.

mbecker908 (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 3:26PM EDT (link)

And make an informed decision. What do you overlook? Nothing. Different people will weight different issues differently. For instance, we have people here who would not vote for a candidate who is in any way pro-choice, without regard to their FisCon creds. Others will look at specifics of their position on both issues.

Change

Purity in candidates vs. purity in voters.

acat (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 3:49PM EDT (link)

I’ll take a Herman Cain (light on experience) or a Pawlenty (light on global warming, according to some…) over a Bart Stupak (or a Ron Paul) any day.

I do not expect every voter to make the same choice, but the flipside is that a candidate needs to be able to appeal to enough voters to win. Bush 1.0 did this by pretending to be Reagan, Bush 2.0 did this by focussing largely on social issues and by not being John F’n Kerry. Either is a winning strategy, as history shows.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 
 
 

To an extent you are right

PowerToThePeople (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 10:03AM EDT (link)

in as much as if we all pull together come general time and vote republican we can win. That was a big issue in 2008. A lot on our side simply stayed home. BUT

When it comes to a few candidates, that statement is not true and here is why. Neither side, republican or democrat make up a majority. In nearly every state, of course some are excluded such as CA for the dems, SC for the republicans, independents sway the vote one way or the other. Same applies to the national elections.

If every single registered republican voted for (candidates name), they still fall short of a win. Same applies to the other side. In order to win, a candidate must take enough of the independent vote to win. Some of the candidates will have huge issues with this.

So when someone states a candidate such as Palin or Paul are unelectable, it has nothing to do with the primary. They said it about O’Donnell and when she won the primary the people were ready to throw the unelectable comments in the faces of the ones who said it. But they were right, she was unable to win the general because there she needed more than the core republican vote. She was unelectable.

Palin has a major problem with the independents. He F/U with them is in the dumps. Will some vote for whoever we put up, yes. But a lot of them, probably a majority, want to vote for us, but they have certain candidates they will not vote for. Paul is another, although I do not believe he could win the primary even if all the stars aligned because most of us have no use for him.

Palin, as it stands, could win the primary simply because it is slanted towards that. But when it comes time for the general, she is sunk. And the only way for her to change that was to have been getting out changing the opinions of the independent voter. A movie, book, etc has not done that and she is running out of time. No one is going to be able to win over voters not doing anything and it takes a lot of time to change people’s minds and that window of opportunity is closing fast.

So yes, when someone says unelectable, they are right. Sentiment is high against Obama, but even those independents who do not like his policy so far will vote a split ticket if we put up the wrong person. They will simply vote for Obama and justify that decision by limiting his power by giving the congress to the republicans. For Palin to win the general, she is going to have to get in the race now, start campaigning hard, and she is going to have to work harder than anyone to convince the very people in the independent ranks who really do not like her that she can do a good job. One liners and cameo appearances is not doing what needs to be done.

Palin as our nominee will do to us the same thing McCain as the nominee did, eliminate a large bloc of voters from voting our way and hand the election over to Obama. Now, if Palin were to start working on her unfavorable ratings with independents and make some serious head way, we would be able to again look at the unelectable comments. But until she does, it stands. And that has nothing to do with my feelings on her politically as I would happily vote for her or almost anyone else if it meant ridding our country of Obama.

It's only May 2011, powertothepeople.

Finrod (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 10:32AM EDT (link)

In May 1991, pretty much every Democrat running was considered unelectable. Heck, that was true going into January 1992. There’s a long campaign between now and next November, and calling anyone ‘unelectable’ at this phase is just plain foolish, plus it’s handing rhetorical weapons to our enemies.

PETA and the ASPCA are pure evil. See here and here.

OK then lets set aside

PowerToThePeople (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 1:14PM EDT (link)

all dates and simply look at it this way.

You answer me this, what does she need to do to get the necessary independent vote, when will she start doing it, and how long do you think it will take to sway them to her side.

Lets not add in any hypothetical factors in that could make it easier or harder for her such as the economy going into depression or economy making a miraculous recovery, lets simply look at what she must do as it stands now and how long can she wait.

See there is a problem with your line of thought, the primary season is not the time to heal your image, it is the time to fight for the republican vote. If she has to waste a lot of time preparing for the general election and the independent vote, she has little time to devote to convincing republicans she is better than the others. Since the primary is mainly for republicans, she will have to chose one duty or the other if she waits too much longer. The election season is a ways off, but primaries are not the far off.

By the way, being honest about a candidate and their chances hands no more weapons to the other side than they already have. They can read polls as well as us and they already know she is in a lot of trouble with the independents. They also know how we feel about Ron Paul, Hunstman, Romney, etc.

I'll be answering this in a diary post later

Finrod (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 2:51PM EDT (link)

I’m going to go through all the candidates, including Palin, and posit why none of them are unelectable.

PETA and the ASPCA are pure evil. See here and here.

 
 
 
 
 

I agree with this article

Goldwater_Conservative (Diary) Wednesday, May 25th at 11:40PM EDT (link)

Erick is right, we need to get past this school yard mentality of “my daddy can beat up your daddy”. My candidate is Pawlenty, but I realize he has fleas and am willing to talk about them. If someone wants to attack his record or what he says, thats fine I dont treat that as if someone just insulted me. But how many of us on here is that not true for?

My candidate is Mitt Romney

calamityjune Thursday, May 26th at 12:30AM EDT (link)

and I don’t think he has any fleas. If I thought he had fleas or some other problem I would find myself another candidate.

I would respectfully suggest that if anybody thinks their candidate has fleas, they keep it to themselves. In this case it’s not doing Pawlenty any favors.

That makes no sense at all

PowerToThePeople (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 12:36AM EDT (link)

every candidate out there has fleas, if you think yours does not, need to put on some glasses when you are searching through the fur, and we NEED to be honest about their strengths and weaknesses as that is our job, If we act as if they are Jesus, we will be disappointed when we realize they are not.

It is our duty to dissect all the candidates so that not only can we make and informed decision, we may help others to do the same.

But thanks for the laugh, it really was funny when you said he was perfect.

Every minute you spend talking about fleas

ayrnieu Thursday, May 26th at 12:54AM EDT (link)

is a minute you aren’t selling the candidate, is a minute that can be twisted and crapped and regurgitated in a Democratic attack-ad, and so on.

I agree that honesty’s important, particularly as I would like to not be caught completely off guard when someone says “yeah, well, what about [this flea]?” But calamityjune is making a sensible point about practical politics, which you shouldn’t laugh at.

Ack, "and cropped" (n/t)

ayrnieu Thursday, May 26th at 12:55AM EDT (link)

ayrnieu, she made no such sensible point at all.

20jan2013 (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 2:57AM EDT (link)

She haughtily looked down on us non-establishment types and said her candidate’s crap doesn’t stink (actually she used another metaphor, but you get the picture). That’s not practical politics, and I hereby laugh in her general direction. I’d have done something else in her general direction, but I’m not Monty Python.

http://archive.redstate.com/stories/the_parties/republicans/mitt_romney_lies_about_abortion

 

Why "sell" damaged and defective merchandise?

aesthete (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 3:55AM EDT (link)

That’s a failing business strategy long-term any time it’s tried, and I fail to see how it is improved upon when applied to politics.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

Got to add you

PowerToThePeople (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 8:00AM EDT (link)

to the makes no sense boat. Calamity did not make a sensible point, she tried to claim her choice in a candidate had no flaws, or keeping with the theme, no fleas. This kind of comment is either complete arrogance or absolute ignorance.

No matter who I chose to back in this election, they will have flaws or past records that are not perfect. The only way to make an informed decision is to accept there are flaws, realize they are not perfect, inform ourselves and others of those flaws, then light the fire to make sure they do not happen again.

And when someone makes the claim of perfection, it is a laughable moment especially with the current crop of candidates and potential candidates.

 
 
 

Newsflash Everybody: Mitt Romney has no fleas. flaws? damn spellcheck! nt

20jan2013 (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 2:55AM EDT (link)

http://archive.redstate.com/stories/the_parties/republicans/mitt_romney_lies_about_abortion

 

Umm, Calamity? If Mitt doesn't have fleas...

acat (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 4:08AM EDT (link)

then could you explain why he could not figure out how to answer questions about corrpution in Illinois politics that the next POTUS would have influence over (appointment of Fed prosecuting attorney) back in 2007? He hemmed and hawed a bit, then .. dropped it.

If this were the only issue Mitt hasn’t been sure which side to come down on, it’d be a pretty small flea, but .. he also had, as his Illinois campaign chair, a guy under investigation by the current prosecuting attorney.

It’s Mitt’s MO – he tries to come down on both sides of an issue – for it before he was against it – and he ends up looking waffly.

To your point of “enabling the Dems”, that applies – after the primary is decided. At that point, we all need to shut up about how bad a candidate is unless there is a very serious problem…. and those are pretty rare.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 

I can only assume you are kidding

Goldwater_Conservative (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 9:29AM EDT (link)

and being sarcastic, but on the off chance you really are serious you are exactly the type of problem Erick is talking about. People who support thier candidate and preted that there is nothing wrong with him, as if he is perfect, have no credibility to the undecided voters. Its like talking to a telemarketer, no matter what you say their answer is going to be redirected back to the positive talking points. When it comes to selling your candidate, to use an overused phrase, keep it real.

Exactly.

Bill S (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 10:18AM EDT (link)

A “my candidate has no fleas/flaws” attitude leads to the kind of “bot” behavior that Erick is referring to. It causes the candidate’s supporters to stretch the truth and come off as nutcases instead of level-headed.

The reason we gave the boot to the Ron Paul supporters is exactly this kind of “my candidate is a god!” behavior. We have occasionally banned commenters who took this kind of nonsense to extremes for other candidates. I believe Erick is trying to head off another Ronbot (or SarahBot or RomBot or or or…) banning exercise. It’s much more productive to have a discussion that recognizes a candidate’s flaws and figures out a strategy for dealing with them.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 
 
 

More worried about Zealots in government

mndasher Wednesday, May 25th at 11:51PM EDT (link)

I am more worried about the Zealots in government. Who do you think populates the halls of the EPA — Zealots. There are many many more in the various bureaucracies.

 

This is why Reagan adhered to the 11th Commandment

Adjoran (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 6:59AM EDT (link)

It’s just too darned easy to slip from rational, reasoned criticism and debate into negative attacks, and then into ever nastier confrontations, building resentments and animosities between multiple camps simultaneously each step of the way, and eventually making the unity required to win the general election problematic to achieve.

Each of our candidates and potential candidates has their own policy schematic and narrative, there are certain to be differences. But those differences are minute in comparison to all of our differences with the Obama-Reid-Pelosi regime. We can’t let them divide us to the point we can’t come together and work enthusiastically for whoever the nominee turns out to be.

We can and should tussle regularly and even brawl on occasion. But no knives, axes, or machetes, and let’s avoid the circular firing squad, mmmkay people?

 

If you don't like

ag8tor Thursday, May 26th at 8:26AM EDT (link)

having the “O” around or the possibility of having him around four more years then you’d better be prepared to support candidates that may not be your first choice. 2008 is a great example. Many of us held our nose while voting for McCain but realized the alternative would be much worse. That was certainly true. The Dems and the leftys in the pro “O” media will try their best to thwart any challengers to the throne. They will still get “a shiver down my leg” when “O” speaks whether he’s actually said anything of importance or not. The Dems will be digging up all the dirt they can (true or otherwise) on any candidate other than the messiah. The point is…let’s not help them. Support your candidate as far as they go but don’t help these marxists. If they don’t have anything on a candidate they have already proven that they will make it up if necessary. If you’re going to beat someone up make it a Democrat. Let’s not let infighting give this clown four more years. The country cannot stand it!

 

Dirty Business

rayhinkle Thursday, May 26th at 8:57AM EDT (link)

The world of instant communications and the fear of any candidate being diminished in an election which is 18 months away, is beyond me. President Reagan made it clear to speak no ill (publicly) of a fellow conservative. Maybe a little wisdom would be appropriate.

 

The Golden Rule - Never speak ill of another (R)

dajeeps (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 9:01AM EDT (link)

…unless they haven’t been able to produce a long form birth certificate.

Just kidding.

Good post! We should be approaching this election season like the mature adults we are (at least I hope), because the stakes are higher now, with all the debt and deficits, and no more accounting tricks to play (when LBJ patched together Bretton-Woods) or gold windows to close. The stakes are higher now than they have ever been in any of our lifetimes.

I like to compare and contrast what we are going through to the election cycles between 1854 and 1860. While I do not believe we’re headed down the same path that generation went down, although anything is possible, I believe there is much to learn from the demise of the Whig Party and remnants of it being rebuilt as the Republican Party. There are many general similarities between the reasons the Whigs went “poof” – as in matters of principle – and the struggle between the Tea Party movement and old school Republicans.

That period of history is exciting to read about, but my sympathies are with the people who had to live through it in real time because the evolution of the Whigs into a party that was more focused on what they believed were the issues of their time wasn’t pretty. It was slow and clunky with many a bruised ego, and worse, along the way. But the result, in a political sense, was grand. With the new party, the Republican Party fully rebuilt and focused on the issues of the day, the consequence was the implosion of the Democrats. If anyone is interested in the details (and if you like to read about all kinds of corruption and political tricks) google Covode and The Demise of the Democrat Party – 1860 and you can download a scanned copy of the Congressional report from the world repository.

What’s even better than that, though, is once the Democrats imploded they wandered in the political wilderness for decades. And I think that is what we really want – beyond all the rest – because we know what they have in mind for our country, which is something most of us cannot tolerate.

So, in the name of unity and trying to get through this in the most respectable manner as possible, and win, I pledge to consider the seriousness of our situation and conduct myself accordingly. The only exception that I may make, however, are statists whom I believe to be counterproductive to the cause of refocusing on the party on tackling the issue of how we got to where we are. Therefore, I do not count branding someone a statist as a personal attack if I also provide examples and proof of such.

…”I would quarrel with both parties and with every individual of each, before I would subjugate my understanding, or prostitute my tongue or pen to either.”
–John Adams

That IS an interesting period to compare-and-contrast with

heartlander (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 10:03AM EDT (link)

We are living through one of the most intense, dangerous periods in the history of our Republic — although most people don’t see that, because our media culture simultaneously distances people from reality while submerging them in its own weird pseudo-reality, resulting in a kind of “sleepwalking” through what’s going on.

Objective reality:

Many millions of Muslims worldwide fervently desire mass deaths in America; some unknown but huge number of them are actively working on that project. Meanwhile, many thousands of their brethren who prefer other methods toward the same ultimate goal of our complete subjugation are currently within our country and are very cleverly and sophisticatedly using our legal system and our “political correctness” social culture to suppress and intimidate those who stand in their way.

Another enemy, the Left, has been in our country for many, many decades, and, having infiltrated and achieved partial or total control of many media organs, universities, churches, labor unions, arts and entertainment entities and school systems, has managed to stage a coup and now controls the Executive branch of the federal government.

The blood of over 50 million innocent children legally murdered in the last four decades is on our heads — a number of victims far exceeding the number of people we once held in slavery, who were liberated only by means of a massively catastrophic civil war.

The social-economic support system on which millions of our citizens depend is predicted — even if nothing else goes wrong — to financially collapse approximately nine years from now. Annual government expenditures will soon exceed total economic output. Future payments already committed to by the federal government exceed $100 trillion.

Most of our government’s debt, which is growing daily, is held by foreign countries.

The country is being invaded by millions of foreigners crossing our borders illegally, including several thousand per year from countries that harbor and/or sponsor terrorists who have announced their plans to kill large numbers of our people.

Anyone who talks about sitting out the election of 2012 because their preferred candidate doesn’t win the GOP nomination, is the moral equivalent of a traitor, in my opinion.

“The still, small voice of God in every human soul is the greatest ally of the pro-life cause, and why it will ultimately prevail.”
–Donald R. McClarey

It's intersting that you mention illegal immigration

dajeeps (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 7:12AM EDT (link)

From what I’ve heard, La Raza has co-opted many of the younger ones by establishing charter schools, which amount to not much more than their version of madrasas along the souther border. They have apparently sent their “students” out to riot and disrupt school board meetings with racist and marxist rants in Tuscon.

Now these charter schools are taxpayer funded, and La Raza is using that money to turn young minority youth into seditious marxist-bots to do their bidding. It is not only a tragedy for the young people themselves, but it a complete tragedy for society and our country at large.

…”I would quarrel with both parties and with every individual of each, before I would subjugate my understanding, or prostitute my tongue or pen to either.”
–John Adams

About those sitting out 2012 if their candidate loses primary

dajeeps (Diary) Thursday, June 2nd at 7:54AM EDT (link)

This is intitally why I brought up the comparison to how remanats of the Whigs became Republicans. It was then, like now, a matter of principle that divided them in a political environment where the old compromises, championed by the Whigs most often, were failing and the consequences of the failures were things the voters were having trouble swallowing. It was also, on the part of some of the politicans themselves, an honorable quaity to sever associations with those who advocated the perpetuation and proagation of slavery, which was the goal of the aggitators that drove the need to keep going back to compromise.

If there is something one thinks is grave and morally wrong, I cannot expect that person to vote FOR perpetuation of that wrong in order to substiute the degrees and varieties by which that wrong is committed. For some, like back then over the issue of slavery, they have come to the point to where whatever that thing is they believe is gravely wrong MUST STOP and there shall be no going back, over their dead body if that that’s what it takes. And that is not sedition.

To be honest, I cannot seem to figure how Mitt Romney, against that kind of backdrop, is on top. He has flip-flopped on many of the issues that offend most of our collective morals. I have to admit that Abraham Lincoln was more of a moderate, but he was moderate in ways that could at least put the country back on the path to correcting the wrong rather than surrendring to it. And that is one thing that is missing from many of the candidates in the line up. They aren’t taking a stand or offering up plans to at least put us on the right path based on principle.

…”I would quarrel with both parties and with every individual of each, before I would subjugate my understanding, or prostitute my tongue or pen to either.”
–John Adams

 
 
 
 

America is going down the tubes...

cja99 Thursday, May 26th at 9:51AM EDT (link)

wake up America before it’s too late. Don’t be so juvenile, we have to be strong, smart, stick together, and just make sure that Obama is a one term President, who is now slowly destroying this country on all fronts.

 

Well said Erick, I'm afraid from time to time we

ihateliberals Thursday, May 26th at 10:41AM EDT (link)

all have a tendency to attack the messenger. It does no good to attack anyone on these post. there is nothing they cn do to fix their candidate to be what you want them to be or to make them go away. A lesson I learned when I managed a garden center many years ago:

“The best way to get rid of weeds in your yard is not to go out and pull them out but to plant really high quality grass and then water and feed it and it will push out the bad things.” So it is with candidates. If you pick a good one and support them they will rise to the top and all others will just go away. You don’t hve to attack anyone’s opinion or ideas. One more saying and then I’m outa here: “Never wrestle with a pig… You get dirty and the pig likes it”. rwt

 

To quote the Bard of Stratford, ...

riverking Thursday, May 26th at 12:05PM EDT (link)

… Erick, “Well said, old mole!”

I totally agree and herewith pledge to never use stronger language than an old fashioned, very polite Texan “Bless your heart!”

(For all damnyankees and other non-Texans, that freely translates to “You are a stupid SOB, a waste of space, and should not be on top of the grass.”)

RiverKing

 

WELL SAID!!

cbondi Thursday, May 26th at 7:14PM EDT (link)

People need to stop and take a breath. Otherwise they start to sound like unhinged democrats!!

 

Agreed

Juggernaut (Diary) Thursday, May 26th at 9:16PM EDT (link)

I come here to learn things about candidates and politics that isn’t found on TV or online in places as it should be. I see nothing wrong with criticizing candidates but going after each other gets old fast. Plus it only encourages members to drop out. No need to beat down on a member just state your opinion without trying to bully them or run them off. Share the facts, no need to get hateful.

RomneyCare is Right Wing Socialism –

Romney “severely conservative”? That’s the opposite of a “compassionate conservative” like George W. Bush? Actually, we know what a severely conservative is. It’s Dick Cheney and Mitt Romney is no Dick Cheney.

 

Let us not forget Obama's internet Protector

mutantone Friday, May 27th at 8:55AM EDT (link)

We should take all that is now on the Internet with a grain of salt after all Obamaommunist has appointed a watch dog to protect his position on line using government funds to support his campaign efforts. Who is to say that he and his crew are not the ones out trashing the Republicans and Tea Party candidates, all under the guise of being loyal? we have already seen how they will run fake tea Party candidates to take votes away from real Republican candidates to allow the democrats to win this is all part of the play book for the Marxist campaign.