« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Triumph of Politics

I am sure you will read a lot about Congressman Weiner and his scandal and morality and failed politicians and us versus them and David Vitter, Larry Craig and Ted Kennedy and what have you. I am sure you will. I am not sure you will read anything similar to my take on this, which is admittedly not as partisan as some other takes may be. But, I think it is the right take.

In a different age, Anthony Weiner would have packed up shop and left Congress with a bag over his head in disgrace. Certainly Congressman Lee left in disgrace, but that had as much to do with his family demands and the demands of his constituency as anything else. In noting that Congressman Weiner staying in office is a failure of morality in the present age, left-wing partisans were quick to bring up the names of Sen. David Vitter, Sen. Larry Craig, Sen. John Ensign, and others.

Instead of saying yes the congressman should leave, the partisans say, “What about this guy?” I believe this is largely because politics has triumphed over morality and we are a lesser people because of it.

Yesterday was the anniversary of D-Day. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers and sailors were willing to risk everything, including their lives, to take Europe back from tyranny. They were real heroes, but also ordinary men. In this day, too often we treat people as heroes because they took a vote in Congress or spoke truth to power, whatever that means, or did something run-of-the-mill that plays to our own personal sense and sensibility without really being extraordinary. We search for heroes in an age of ordinariness.

One of the greatest fights in the country right now is politics. We play on teams. We are partisans. We have allowed Washington to acquire for itself extraordinary power over our lives on a daily basis and consequently are willing to stand by our man when our man screws up, because the fight is so important. Were the fight not so important, we would be willing to throw the bums out.

I’ll just use myself instead of throwing stones in other directions. At the time of Sen. Vitter’s scandal, I was fairly direct that I thought he needed to go. But, in this last election cycle though I did nothing to help in the primary, after the primary all was forgiven. Better him than the Democrat. I was much more willing to see Larry Craig driven from the Senate if only because he was not as conservative as I preferred him to be and the odds were slim to none a Democrat would replace him.

Now, feel free to ridicule me and my values, but I suspect you do the same. The point of all this is because we have allowed Washington to become too important to our lives. When Washington was not so important, the fights not so critical, and the votes not so close, we could afford for morality to triumph over politics.

Now, if we can’t beat these guys in primaries, which I fully advocate for, we’re left defending our own side because of what the other side will do. It’s Republican and Democrat alike. Unfortunately, only one side supports disarming Washington, demilitarizing the politics of the day, and returning power to the states and the people. Sadly, that side also has a greater propensity to throw its bums out than the other. While Larry Craig left and John Ensign left left and Congressman Lee left, Ted Kennedy was heralded routinely as the liberal lion and hero of the Senate despite having killed a woman. Anthony Weiner will stay. Barney Frank stayed.

Conservatives are less tolerant of slimeballs in offce, but we too succumb. We cannot afford, so we think, to relinquish soldiers in the fight for freedom from the battlefield, no matter how immoral they may be. But we shouldn’t be that way. We are better than that.

I still believe there will come a final and ultimate day. And on that day it will not matter how hard we fought to repeal Obamacare or how hard we fought to change the tax structure in the country or even how hard we fought for marriage or life or many other causes the conservative movement fights for. On that last day, all that will matter is where we placed the cross in our lives. So we should not be willing to surrender moral high ground just because the other side does. And we do surrender the moral high ground on occasion.

It should not be enough for us to say the other side is worse or the other side does this or there were those on our side who the same. It should be for us to admit we have allowed the political to triumph over morality in this country because we have ceded our power, our destiny, and our future to a few people in Washington who have no respect for us or for the values of our founders or for the freedoms that keep us free.

Our fight is not a fight to expose the other side as moral cretins and hypocrites, but to expose Washington for its failings. These are failings on both sides with both political parties willing to keep power in Washington with no consideration for the states or the people. The states have become administrative agencies of the federal government and the people are just servants to Washington.

Were there not so much at stake for either side Anthony Weiner would have been politely escorted off the stage. The left has abandoned all moral high ground and decided that he’s their bad guy, but gosh darn it he is right on their issues. The feminists defending Weiner could care less what he did because however much they may claim they care about two X chromosomes more than anything else, in reality they will gladly put down the bra so long as they never have to surrender the hammer and sickle — uterine concerns ultimately take a back seat to advancing the proletariat.

The right succumbs to the same temptations and we should not let the left, in badgering us about those who have fallen short on our side, cause us to ignore that there is a place for real forgiveness and repentance. We should not be willing to throw people overboard at the drop of a hat. But we should also be willing to push people out the door who have such moral failings that they cannot possibly lead.

Unfortunately, as Washington consumes more and more power and we become more and more slaves to the state, politics triumphs over morality and we decide it is better to let the immoral stay on the playing field because we cannot spare the loss than to uphold the standards on which we will actually be judged on that final day.

COMMENTS

  • bags64

    “I believe this is largely because politics has triumphed over morality and we are a lesser people because of it.”

    Politics has become more about sport and less about leadership and the country’s well-being.

  • southernpatriots

    Sad, but true. We must take the high moral ground. We must be different. If the salt has lost its savour how will the earth be preserved? If we have lost our moral standing how can we lead our own lives, lead our families, much less lead the nation and world? The Christ of the Cross tells us that.

    The leftists will always have the Weiners, Franks, and other hot dogs. We must rise above this. Expect more from ourselves and deliver more.

    In order for conservatives to continue to enjoy an ascendancy we will.

  • avgjo

    We cannot afford morality because Washington is so big. But Washington is so big because of a lack of morality.

    When people bought into redistribution schemes, Washington got more power.

    When corrupt special interests began currying favor and undermining the rule of law, and the politicians who played along were not punished at the polls by the country, Washington got more power.

    When America allowed the national conversation to be reduced to merely material terms, Washington got more power.

    All kinda makes you think of what Ben Franklin wrote to that French Abbey:

    ‘Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.’

    I do wonder though: is first taking power from Washington and then being able to worry about morality the correct approach? Or is it backward? If what Franklin and many others of the Founders said about morality and freedom, is the PREREQUISITE for freedom (e.g., making Washington weaker) morality?

    Thanks for writing this. Few among the famous have the guts to bring this sort of thing up.

  • Cajun Pete

    …that such an approach entails a type of unilateral disarmament (throwing some of our best fighters overboard while the opposition retains theirs). Logically, the point is hard to argue.

    But, I believe we must be better than that anyway. We must fight for the right and rely on faith in the eventual and guaranteed victories.

    “For what shall it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his soul?” (Mark 8:36 Douay-Rheims)

  • saccrewdog

    … in these discussions is that the writers often refer to these people as our “leaders.” When I vote, I am not choosing a leader; rather, I am selecting someone whom I feel will best represent me in either the state or national capitol or my borough hall, or I am selecting a candidate that I believe will do the best job of running things. I keep in mind that I, as one of We, the People, am responsible for staffing and personnel in our government. I do not consider myself as “under” their rule or working for them, a fundamental nuance which seems to most often fall by the wayside. I have standards. My employees respect those standards, or they work elsewhere. Due to the nature of the beast, we must delegate, but we must never cede responsibility.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    All the people who are upset that politics has become such a bloodsport ought to think about why that is. It is because the Federal government controls so much of our lives that in some cases power becomes a matter of life and death.

    If we returned to the principles of limited government and Federalism people could go through their entire lives barely thinking about which party was in power.

  • napensnake

    It is worse than this. We do not elect congressmen to lead. We elect them to represent us. I will not happily have a “moral cretin” represent me and will work to remove him/her. If Manhattan decides that they can be appropriately represented by immorality, that is their decision. But then we know more about Manhattan.

    I would suggest that Congress is a reflection of the standards of the various regions of the United States. The fact that Ted Kennedy could continue to be elected tells me more about Massachusetts than the state’s chamber of commerce ever could. When it gets to the point that the representatives of the immoral overwhelm the representatives of the decent, it will be time to go to the mountain and “not look back” for fear of being turned into a pillar of salt.

  • bbfmail

    Considering the state this country is in since Obama was elected..if anyone’s resignation should be demanded..it should be Obama, Biden and the whole WH staff and Obama appointees.

  • ag8tor

    Bill Clinton, Barney Franks, Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid as role models, why would anyone expect anything else from the “anything goes” crowd. Weiner is just the latest in the line of morally bankrupt Dems that have been protected by the usual tripe from the left. Like a new tax, they’v never met a lib they won’t take up for or promote. They’ll keep the Weiner matter in front of the press who will gladly keep reporting on it so they can take the spotlight off the failings of this administration and this do-nothing congress.We Conservatives both Republican and Independent are not free from shame as to the actions of our members of Congress. How ever, they are generally man enough to do what’s right both morally and ethically. It is clear that morals and ethics have no place in a Democratic administration or a Marxist agenda. It’s just business as usual in DC for the libs!

  • sundaycombo

    The outcry over Weiner is driven not so much by his actions but by his high profile history of bashing Republicans. He was due to be taken down a peg and this sure did the trick. The word “hubris” seems to be most appropriate at this time. But let’s not overreact..

    As long as David Vitter serves in the Senate, the Democrats have a “get out of jail free” card when it comes to morality in office. By any objective standard his actions were far more serious than Weiners. As long as we are willing to accept his reliable conservative vote in exchange for looking the other way at his personal foibles then we can say nothing about Weiner.

  • gunslingr45

    you don’t mind if I use parts of this because, I will.
    WE THE PEOPLE not them, are the leaders of this great nation!

    “It isn’t that Liberals are ignorant. It’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.” (Ronald Reagan)

  • tomaso11

    This article is a perfect example of why conservatives are too stupid to run this country. When a democRAT gets caught, conservatives rush in to forgive and forget and squeal about what swell people we are. When a Republican gets caught, democRATS move in for the kill. democRATS are goal oriented and conservatives are not. The technical term for that is losers. Stupid is as, well, you can see for yourself.

  • CFPeterson

    Conservatives take the moral high ground, and its one of the reasons I am proud to say I am conservative. As Limbaugh says the left uses its trespasses as resume builders. Though it pains me to see sleezy guys line Wiener, Frank, Rangel, Kennedy, etc, etc thrive I am confident that God will win over the godless in the end.

  • johnCV

    As long as David Vitter serves in the Senate, the Democrats have a ?get out of jail free? card when it comes to morality in office.

    By all means – since our side has not achieved perfection we should never expect moral behavior from the Left. We have Vitter, so they can use that as an excuse for the continuing corruptions of Frank, Dodd, Weiner, Reid, Kennedy, Hastings, Waters, ad nauseum…..?

    I guess Lee, Livingston, Cunningham, Craig, etc. meant nothing?

    The point here is that although not perfect, the Right will, by and large, clean its own house because corrupt actions are anathema to who we are.

    For the Left, corruption is who they are. If we let them slide because we accept deviant behavior, we may as well just turn the country over to then right now because we have lost.

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_weiner_analysis

    A lot of verbiage about whether Weiner will hurt the poor Dems in the next election. Nary a word about whether his actions make him too big of a jerk to continue in service.

  • robp

    Liberals: circle the wagons, put the accused inside the circle, and frantically shoot at any accusers, while pointing at some conservative and justifying their actions.

    Conservatives: circle the wagons, push out the accused, and leave him for the buzzards

    This used to really bug me, until I realized this: people expect more out of conservatives.

    This is why it’s so important to clean our own house: we can’t give liberals any justification. It’s self-defeating.

  • barrowmrb

    Every time a Republican does something immoral or bad,,
    the Democrates go crazy. They yell, They scream, They make
    news conferences. THEY FIGHT.

    NOW,,HERE IS A CHANCE FOR PAYBACK..

    OH, BUT NO. JOHN BOENER, ERIC CANTOR AND THE REGULAR TALK NEWS SHOWS,,,JUST SIT ON THEIR BUMS
    AND “FEEL SORRY” FOR REP. WEINER.

    WITH NO GUTS AND A GROUP OF COWARDS WE WILL LOOSE THE ELECTION IN YR 2012.

    THANKS TO ALL THE GUTLESS REPUBLICANS FOR SELLING AMERICA DOWN THE STREET AGAIN.

  • http://www.ArchitecturalShots.com mdyou

    No one who advocates, or sits idly by during the murder of babies can be moral.

    During the Obamacare train wreck, there was ONE, one democrat who stood in the way temporarily, Stupak. He served as the Judas sheep for squishy democrats and independents during the ‘debate’. With the willing compliance of the media, he was used as an illusion to provide an air of legitimacy to the ‘language’ that prevented federal money from being used for abortions.

    Our side has more than out share of miscreants, but let’s face it – there is no future for our country unless we prevail.

  • belcatar

    I think it’s a vicious circle. Washington gets more power, then people go to Washington and get a taste of that power, and think they can do whatever they want with no consequences. These people are the ones making laws, which end up being self-serving. With more power, they continue to push the boundaries of acceptable behavior, believing that their newly legislated power places them above the standards everyone else follows.

    I find it hard to believe that a man like Randall “Duke” Cunningham was an evil, corrupt scumbag when he first set foot in Washington. I suspect (I have never been to Washington) that the place changes people.

    I don’t think “conservative” or “liberal” matters when it comes to this kind of thing. I agree with Erick that once political power is placed where it belongs (as close to the individual as possible) these kinds of moral failings will no longer be tolerated.

  • Tbone

    It is as simple as that.

  • norinosnocinos

    How is Weiner’s indiscretion any different than the Lewinsky scandal?

    The big truth is liberals are without morality. The political class in general lacks a sense of morals.

  • Aaron Gardner

    We’re not democrats and we have no desire to act like them.

    You can go on being democrat lite if you wish.

  • Ed54

    Morality is a judgement call. Voters should certainly take it into consideration, but atonement and forgiveness are possible.

    Public Integrity, however, should be absolute. We should have zero tolerance for any politician, of any party or political persuasion, who knowingly makes false statements. It cannot be otherwise.

    This recent cultural attitude that “all politicians are liars” is enormously destructive to our society. We should demand absolute truthfulness from anyone who works in our government.

    Watching Weiner on TV last week denying everything, it is impossible not to conclude he is a pathological liar. How can we trust such a man to occupy any position of authority in public government? We have not seen such a knowingly false, bald-faced public liar on national TV since Bill Clinton.

  • johnt

    all the same, the same mind set. Throw in assorted scandals, financial deliberate war on the nation, the fanatical defense of a president, Clinton, who sold his country to foreign bidders, never mind the sex stuff, the creature currently defaming the WH with his presence, the absolute power lust, but why go on?
    I suppose that at the least we can say of of the Republicans as a body is that they are not psychotic freaks acting out primeval power lusts, living for the opportunity to cause pain, to control & destroy.
    Not much but it’s something.

  • BrendanW

    “In a different age” – maybe there was one or two ages where this was true, but generally speaking politicians have gotten away with sordid behavior, because those around them have protected them and looked the other way, or the public didn’t feel compelled to know what went on behind the door.

  • rightwingmom52

    “Our fight is not a fight to expose the other side as moral cretins and hypocrites…” – because they do a pretty good job of that all by themselves.

    “And on that day it will not matter … how hard we fought for marriage or life or many other causes the conservative movement fights for. On that last day, all that will matter is where we placed the cross in our lives.”

    The fight for life is a moral issue first and foremost. How we stand on that issue (and others) has a direct correlation to where the cross is in our lives. This is not to say that we don’t fall short, but there is a vast difference in supporting and advocating an immoral, vicious act like abortion and falling to temptation while striving to walk in the light. I agree that ultimately we will all be judged accordingly, but our actions have consequences even then.

    Thank you for this diary. You are an encouragement to those of us who still believe that a moral society is the best and freest of all.

  • 23rdamerical

    is based on moral behavior, not what is acceptable behavior in a permissive atmosphere. Morals are based on God-established principles like the Ten Commandments. Today they’re considered “ten suggestions for better living”. NOT! I’ve found that folks that do things like the moral tumbles we see from our elected leaders indicate they have few boundaries. If they’re sexual sleazebags, they’ll probably fall in other morally controlled areas of their lives such as not having a problem stealing and lying! Psalm 33:12,
    “Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD; and the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance.” Americans better wake up!

  • 23rdamerical

    they will lie… is there any boundaries left?

  • caboose

    I checked, Weiner is a UNITED STATES CONGRESSMAN. That means that he is paid by the tax money taken from those of us that pay taxes.( 51%) of so caller workers, freeloaders, pay no taxes in this country, but take full advantages of those people , 49%, who do pay taxes. Weiners vote affects all of us. As a united States Congressman, he must answer to all Americans, not just whats seems to be a bunch of misfits in his districts that puts their selfishness above America. It is ludricous to take the notion that Weiner’s conduct and discipline, rest only with the Democrat Party. It’s just as crazy to pretend that because Vitters was duly elected to the Senate, that somehow, it justifies Weiner’ pervert unethical behavior. It don’t. If my memory serves me, Vitters was never formely charged of any wrong doing and the allegation that was made was from Democrats during an election and they said that the supposed wrong was done several years before without one presented evidence of proof. Every American should be writing to the congress and demanding this scum Weiner’s resignation. Finally, I would like to point out that, Duke Cunningham did wrong while serving as a Congressman and he was sentenced to seven years in prison in which he is now serving. For those of us that paid dues to this Country and served in Vietnam, you especially owe a great debt to Duke Cunningham. His contribution to Air Superiorty, more than likely saved your @$$. Duke was a Navy Ace, one of five Navy Aces in Vietnam. Had it not been for Duke Cunningham and real Americans like him, Hundreds of thousands of Americans in addition to the 58,000 Americans would have lost their lives, not to mention Hundreds of billions of dollars, that it would have cost America to replace Bases, Aircraft and equipment due to bombing from North Vietnam, that would have surley happened. While Duke did a wrong in taking a bribe of a couple million dollars, he did more right by saving countless lives and hundreds of billions of dollars, of America’s money. Thanks Duke for your service to this Country!

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    Sorry, just couldn’t help it….

  • rightwingmom52
  • sundaycombo

    His phone number was found in the DC Madam’s records 5 times. When he was asked about it by the press he admitted to “committing a very serious sin in the past”. You can do the math. The DC MAdam herself confirmed he was a customer. The probable reason he was not charged was the statute of limitations had run out on his crime.

    I stand by my statement. When folks like Vitter (and until recently John Ensign) serve as Republican Senators we will always look like hypocrites when we put on our morality police hats and go after people like Weiner

  • Vaughn Harold

    I’m reminded of a great truth, the heart of every issue is an issue of the heart.

    Our government is the direct result of the heart of America.

    There is only one way to take back this country, devine intervention.

  • rightwingmom52

    And I’m in favor of both “devine” intervention via Mike “Gamecock” Devine and “divine” intervention via Almighty God.

    No intent to be snarky about the misspelling. Just couldn’t resist the nod to Mr. Devine himself.

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil truth

    I still believe there will come a final and ultimate day. And on that day it will not matter how hard we fought to repeal Obamacare or how hard we fought to change the tax structure in the country or even how hard we fought for marriage or life or many other causes the conservative movement fights for. On that last day, all that will matter is where we placed the cross in our lives.

    I would only add to the end of that last sentence

    …and how we treated the One who was nailed to that cross.”

    which in turns to remembrance that for all his words through the year, there’s one statement our now-retired pastor made on several occasions which always caught me up short – a statement of faith from his heart:

    I stake my life on the One with nail prints in His hands

    and the unspoken challenge: “Do we also?”

    And then there’s the rest of your paragraph

    So we should not be willing to surrender moral high ground just because the other side does. And we do surrender the moral high ground on occasion.

    which I have to say stands as a rebuke to yesterday, when despairingly overwhelmed by seeing the utter abandonment of any kind of moral consistency in favor of blind partisanship in the treatment of Rep. Weiner by the media and party colleagues, I reverted to an eye-for-an-eye response of “okay then, we’ll play by your rules from now on” – thereby precisely surrendering the moral high ground “because the other side does”.

    Thus today you remind me (and us) that our allegiance is ultimately to a higher calling; our citizenship and residency is to where the One who was lifted upon that cross is drawing us.

  • Hugh

    I think you got the same message that I got from Erick. All of our activism really doesn’t matter when we consider the cross of Jesus Christ and spending an eternity with Him. Please do not misunderstand, I am not suggesting that we cease activism. But, I for one must occasionally step back and remind myself that God is in perfect control of all things including governments. Romans 13:1 NIV “Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.”

  • Cheetah772

    Your article can be better summarized succinctly in one sentence: the era of good feelings is over.

    Look it up on the Google if you don’t know the historical meaning of that phrase….

  • avgjo

    Integrity and Morality? I always thought that Integrity was a manifestation of morality. Please clarify.

  • avgjo

    Founders. You will see a consistency between what they said then and what they said for public consumption re: moral and philosophical matters. The difference is now that even the good guys have succumbed to a degree of moral relativism and much compromise. The founding generations of this country believed in certain principles enough to die for them; that’s why dueling was not uncommon for many years in this country, including among our ‘political class’. Could you imagine the Crybaby John Boehner or the Fop Eric Cantor challenging someone to a duel over an affair of honor? I’ll wet myself laughing at the prospect. Sadly, this is true for perhaps the majority of Americans today. The Ancient Greeks were right: the government of a place is a clear reflection of the people it governs.

  • avgjo

    Founders. You will see a consistency between what they said then and what they said for public consumption re: moral and philosophical matters. The difference is now that even the good guys have succumbed to a degree of moral relativism and much compromise. The founding generations of this country believed in certain principles enough to die for them; that’s why dueling was not uncommon for many years in this country, including among our ‘political class’. Could you imagine the Crybaby John Boehner or the Fop Eric Cantor challenging someone to a duel over an affair of honor? I’ll wet myself laughing at the prospect. Sadly, this is true for perhaps the majority of Americans today. The Ancient Greeks were right: the government of a place is a clear reflection of the people it governs.

  • aesthete

    for those who seek to have our civil institutions mirror our religious ones, or at least to enforce their precepts. The inherent problems with use of violence to effect positive change, and the type of persons inclined to want to control violence for their own ends, suggests that government is a poor enforcer of moral norms. Indeed, you’d be hard-pressed to find morality in any of the halls of power of government, whether in the US or abroad. It is for this reason, among others, that government usurpation of moral and religious movements more often than not leads to a decline, rather than an enhancement, of said movement.

    Good write-up, Erick.

  • eaglewingz

    It’s because democraps NEVER resign except after conviction, that republicans are beginning to say, why should we commit hari kari, when brothel purveyors, girl killers, male page seducers, $100K freezer cash keepers, etc., on the democrap side get a free ride? Once again, democrap politicians drive deviancy upwards by their low moral standards and insatiable thirst for unlimited power.

  • momofthecastle

    They are not leaders, they are public servants!!

  • momofthecastle

    n/t

  • momofthecastle

    Integrity:
    2. The entire, unimpaired state of any thing, particularly of the mind; moral soundness or purity; incorruptness; uprightness; honesty. Integrity comprehends the whole moral character, but has a special reference to uprightness in mutual dealings, transfers of property,and agencies for others.

    Morality: The doctrine or system of moral duties, or the duties of men in their social character; ethics.
    2. The quality of an action which renders it good; the conformity of an act to the divine law, or to the principles of rectitude. This conformity implies that the act must be performed by a free agent, and from a motive of obedience to the divine will. This is the strict theological and scriptural sense of morality. But we often apply the word to actions which accord with justice and human laws, without reference to the motives form which they proceed.

  • avgjo

    ‘moral soundness or purity’ ‘integrity comprehends ….’ So it is a manifestation. I got the impression ed was trying to separate the two when they cannot be.

  • BrendanW

    Washington was a womanizer who married for station.

    Jefferson was sleeping with one of his slaves.

    Jefferson also ran with Madison’s help a scurrilous campaign against Adams – and tries to do similar to Washington.

    Burr was a scum bag.

    According to some accounts FDR had “personal” issues with his marriage and maybe drinking, before he contracted polio.

    Etc.

    The founders might have been men of honor (looking at the duel between Burr and Hamilton – it was more stupid than anything IMO) but they weren’t necessarily men of outstanding virtue at all times.

    I’m not sure all these allegations are true, but plenty of politicians in our history have “over come” personal scandal to become leaders of the nation. It’s wishful thinking (and a common trait) that things were better back in the day.