« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Newt Gingrich; Ames, Iowa; and Rick Perry. What It All Means.

Had you tuned in to my radio show two nights ago, you would have heard me tell the world that Newt Gingrich’s campaign was disintegrating. Had you jumped over to RedState yesterday at noon for my Presidential horserace post, you’d have seen again that sources were telling me Newt’s campaign was in complete meltdown and I did not expect him to survive.

Well, you’d have heard it here first, but whether you heard it here or elsewhere, by now you know Newt Gingrich’s campaign is dead. The national staff left en masse and the Iowa staff is gone. They all quit.

Newt Gingrich wrote on Facebook that he is still in the race and will relaunch in Los Angeles on Monday. My only theory is that he is relying on a team of Hollywood special effects guys to build him a team of animatronic campaign staffers.

Many of us admire Newt Gingrich’s intellect, but even while Speaker of the House, Newt had a reputation as uncontrollable and undisciplined. While the press may say the implosion of his campaign has to do with his staff’s loyalty to Rick Perry, I believe the real answer is that Newt too frequently went off message, did not engage, and most likely has not taken the steps necessary to build a campaign war chest of both money and critical allies. And no staffer seeing this would want to wait around for a later more obvious candidate led implosion that makes the innocent staff look culpable.

I’m sure the Mediterranean cruise was one of the last straws.

With Newt in, but his national staff fleeing, there is massive speculation tonight that Texas Governor Rick Perry is going to get into the race.

In other news, Governor Mitt Romney, who won the Ames Straw Poll in 2008, has decided not to participate in the Ames, Iowa straw poll this year. That weekend just so happens to be the weekend of the RedState Gathering in Charleston, S.C. Coincidence? Well, yeah, but . . . .

Anyway, what do these three events mean? Well, I’ll tell you.Right now, I think the Gingrich implosion and the Romney departure from the Ames Straw Poll both help Tim Pawlenty. In fact, we’re seeing the fruit of this already. Newt Gingrich’s Co-Chairman, former Georgia Governor Sonny Perdue, has jumped ship to Tim Pawlenty. I hear others will too.

Likewise, Romney out in Ames leaves Pawlenty as the biggest name. It should, however, be noted that Romney won the Ames Straw Poll in 2008 and wound up losing the state. But a Pawlenty win would give him strong buzz.

All that said, if Rick Perry winds up getting into the race, it will do several things.

First, it guarantees that Sarah Palin will not run for President. I have it from sources close to both Governors that Palin will not run if Perry runs.

Second, it rocks Tim Pawlenty’s world hard. I think a Rick Perry candidacy fundamentally hurts Tim Pawlenty’s effort to be the conservative in the race. Likewise, Pawlenty cannot match Perry’s gubernatorial record, though to be fair that has as much to do with governing Minnesota instead of Texas as it does with them being different people.

Third, Perry’s entry would buy Mitt Romney time in the lead. Time is the one campaign commodity that cannot be added to. Every day Mitt Romney leads is a day it becomes increasingly likely Romney is the nominee. If Perry gets in, odds increase that Romney, not Perry, is the nominee.

Fourth, Rick Perry’s entry into the Presidential race probably opens up the Texas Senate race even more. Lt. Governor Dewhurst would probably calculate he stands a better chance of taking over the Governor’s office on the cheap than spending big on a Senate seat.

A Perry candidacy throws the whole race into chaos. It’ll actually be wonderful to watch. I said a few weeks ago I thought Rick Perry needed to run. I would say so again now more than ever. His record in Texas on jobs presents a compelling alternative to Barack Obama whether Perry is the ultimate nominee or not.

If Perry does not get in, Tim Pawlenty just had a very, very good week.

COMMENTS

  • audax

    …has anything to do with wether he is the nominee. Caucus and primary VOTERS will determine the nominee. They are elected to the State and national nominating convention and Romney would need their votes in the caucuses and primaries. Romneycare and Romneys new found beliefs in the global warming witchcraft could help them decide to vote for others in the primaries, after all there are lots of better choices, including, hopefully, a Perry or a Palin, a Bachmann or a Cain, and a Pawlenty or a Guliani.

  • loveitorleaveit

    Man-made global warming, RomneyCare and ethanol subsidies – Romney is another RINO who will lose the general election.

  • politicalqrm

    was not listening to his staff, Who goes on a vacation after announcing a bid for the presidency? You hit the ground running and keep going. That indicated he wasn’t serious.

    Also, and I’ll probably get a bunch of screaming on this one, but his wife was too involved. From what I have read she calls the shots on many issues. Not good. It’s very hard to make decisions in a campaign when the candidate keeps saying “what do you think, honey?”

    His trashing of Paul Ryan didn’t help either. How can you win the conservatives when you’re trashing the one issue they care about most?

    This campaign is over. Give it up, Newt.

  • radicalrighty

    a year in the run-up to ’08? National polls mean little if anything when the primaries begin. Usually the first four tell the tale.

  • radicalrighty

    Highly intelligent, but also highly unlikable – disgraceful resignment from congress, going through spouses like Liz Taylor, then the Ryan thing. Newt never had a chance.

  • veritaseequitas

    alternative to BOgus.

  • gunslingr45

    Newt to that list and I can agree!!

    So many RINO?s so little time!

  • bruceinva

    and hope he takes the right approach and shares his good ideas (he has some) with the eventual nominee. Also think the perfect job for Palin would be to replace Priebus.

  • reclaimliberty

    I am writing the biggest check I will ever write to a presidential candidate.

  • Bob_Frazier

    Romney can’t beat Obama. I don’t think Pawlenty can either. So I hope very much that Rick Perry gets in. And we better do our job and win him the nomination or shame on us. We do not need another “moderate” in conservative clothing changing the definition of what a conservative is.

  • Bob_Frazier

    Romney can’t beat Obama. I don’t think Pawlenty can either. So I hope very much that Rick Perry gets in. And we better do our job and win him the nomination or shame on us. We do not need another “moderate” in conservative clothing changing the definition of what a conservative is.

  • dudette

    How does that figure, sorry to be dim on the inside game, but i dont get it. please enlighten, thank you,

  • Raven

    It was Pawlenty or Jordan.
    Perry gets in, the race is over.

    And Palin was never going to run, regardless of what Governor Perry chooses to do. She was trying to encourage him to get into it.

  • edniceville

    is too close to the Bush clan to be a viable candidate, and will play that tune until we can’t stand it. Which should take about 3 seconds! Anytime a true Conservative looks like they will make “a move”, they have to bring out the “attack dogs”. It doesn’t matter if there is any credence to it, it is just the way they operate. Learn it, know it, and move on!

  • Scott

    The Contract with America was great, but Newt was not the sole contributor to that and it was almost 20 yrs ago. Since then, I am not sure what I have ever heard from him that was so smart. Any who falls for the global warming hoax can’t be that intelligent can they? He likes to throw out the old intellectual canard of “Let’s start a national conversation”. Which is code for I don’t have a good idea, but i want to sound smart.

  • paramedichess

    If Perry jumps in, the MSM and Obama campaigns will act as if he is the second coming of GWB. This would be ironic given the enormous amount of bad blood between Bush’s clan and Perry.

  • paramedichess

    Anyone can beat Obama (except probably Palin). A quick look at the electoral map from 2008 vs. the senate/gubernatorial maps from 2010 will tell you that. Even left-leaning politico had an article recently talking about the difficulty the Obama camp is having coming up with a plan that nets them 270 electoral votes. Don’t get me wrong. We can do much better than Romney, and I hope that we do, but Obama is in terrible shape, and as long as we unite behind the nominee, whoever he is, Obama gets to retire in January of 2013.

  • gregorysstewart

    Even with Perry in the race, I think Paulenty has a good week. Tim was mired in “nobody outside the mid-west knows me” status. He hits all the right notes, but he does it without setting the world on fire. His luggage is light (a support for cap and trade that he has repudiated and an idiotic joke about his wife.) Tim may not be the strongest executive in the race, with Perry in, but he was a good popular and competent governor who would bring Minnesota into the red column, and maybe Iowa and Wisconsin as well, as a VP. Tim will not embarrass the top line candidate, nor will he outshine him.

    I think Tim has been running for VP from the outset, and a Perry Paulenty ticket would be very hard to beat.

  • Finrod

    Almost anyone running (save Luap Nor) could beat Obama, IMHO.

  • jillie

    No white candidate can unseat BHO…the race card is still the trump card.
    Herman Cain or Allen West with a female VP candidate is the only hope!

  • clarkm

    I read a good viewpoint about this on w ww.whitehousevoice.com

  • Goldwater_Conservative

    in fact I’d say its the exact opposite. After 4 years of Obama, I think we can lay off the stupid identity politics for once.

  • http://todaysasbestos.wordpress.com scotteiland

    Why not both?

    Let’s match Senators ‘Prompter and Plugs against two proven executives who would wipe the floor with the former Senators in the debates? A Minnesota-Texas, North-South conservative coalition?

    Is there ANY doubt that Pawlenty would disembowel Plugs in a debate? And Perry could showcase the jobs record in Texas vs. the other 49 states. What can ‘Prompter say to that? “BUSH?”

    That dog won’t hunt again.

  • scatterometry

    Erick,

    If Perry enters the race, and, as you say above, that helps Romney to become the Nominee (which I am not really in support of…AGW, Romneycare, etc.) WHY should you wish that, as you say, “I thought Rick Perry needed to run. I would say so again now more than ever.”

    If he runs, and doesn’t get the nomination and helps Romney to do so, what good does that do those of us who consider ourselves staunch conservatives…??????

    -Extremely concerned about the future of the Country

  • gregorysstewart

    If Perry runs that will hardly improve Romney’s chances. Perry has the Rolodex of the Republican Governor’s Association. He has the most enviable record of any state and has had a growing economy during the very same time that the community organizer from Chicago watched his economy fizzle.

    Perry does not carry Romney carry around like a millstone on his neck. His heaviest baggage is that he is from Texas. You know, Texas that just added four seats to its congressional delegation. Texas that has created as many jobs during the economic downturn as the rest of the nation combined. That Texas.

    Perry will unite the Palin wing, the tea party wing and the “Jeeze we are in trouble” wings of the Republican party, under a super competent executive.

  • gpclaw

    and we get closer to the primaries. In June 2007, Giuliani was leading the polls, followed by McCain. Romney, who has little name recognition at the time, was just starting to get noticed.

    The only values the polls have right now is for trending purposes, which tells us if a candidate gaining or losing recognition.

  • gpclaw
  • gpclaw

    Which is why the polls are meaningless for ranking the candidates. At this stage of the game, the only thing the polls are useful for, is telling us who is gaining or losing support.

  • gpclaw

    On the big issues, Romney and Obama might as well be the same person. Actually, Romney is Hillary Clinton. I’m sure if they had to do it all over again, the middle of the road Obama voter would have voted for Hillary aka Romney.

    Romney as president would kill the Republican party, because it would mean more Big Government policies, and the return to Republican centrism.

  • chihank

    Last night on Bill O’Reilly, Dem Pollster Pat Caddell lamented how Palin’s tour bus was absorbing all the oxygen from other candidates. I wonder if Palin did the bus tour to any freeze any momentum from the other candidates to enable Perry to quietly assemble a Presidential campaign.

  • rail426

    Will he run ? Perry is very concerned that there does not appear to be a conservative running. Scuttlebutt here in south central Texas says that it looks like he will. Here’s my two cents on this….If Rob Johnson and Dave Carney go back to work for Perry, chances are very good he will run. But if Sarah Palin gets into the race, Perry won’t run, and will instead support Palin. That having been said, I don’t think that Palin will get into the race this time. Do I have any inside information on this? No, I’m just a farmer/diesel mechanic that likes to follow politics, and who may someday engage in them myself.

    Personally, I hope Perry does run. If he does, I think he can win, not just the nomination, but the White House as well. Now, let’s just sit back and see what happens.

  • gregorysstewart

    Wow! That is pretty Machiavellian!

    In order for that to actually work, though, Palin would have to be in all the right places at the right time. Think about it. She would have to be in the Nation’s capital on Memorial day weekend, so that footage of her on a motorcycle would make news.

    She would need to be seen talking to other populist candidates, who are no longer in the hunt. I am thinking dinner with someone like Trump.

    She would need to upstage announcements by poll leaders on the day they announced their campaign.

  • gekster

    the campaign season is in the infanty stage.
    In August/September it will be in the teenage stage.
    Thats when people will start to really pay attention.
    Right now it is the tree falling in the forest thing.
    Polls mean nothing, only name recognition.
    Pundits spewing are just that, pundits spewing.
    They have to say anything to keep interest in themselves.
    The people that matter are more interested in the upcomeing summer,
    vacations and such.
    After school starts next fall, words will start to mean something real then.
    No one is sucking air from anyone, it is just who the news want to pay attention to.
    And if Palin is such a nobody, why all the attention.
    If she is going to run, expect the announcement in the fall.
    If not then, then it will be never.

  • acat

    Please bear in mind that, at this point in the 2008 campaign, the media had already decided that McCain should be our candidate… There were a number of people – and a historical search of Red State will find them – who thought “someone better” would come along and win …

    Don’t think they’re not doing the same thing here with Mitt.

    While the campaign season may be in its’ early days – I’d say kiddiegarden, not infancy – the media are already telegraphing their support.

    Mew

  • red_oakster

    The rules of the game are stacked against him. It’s not impossible, but it is unlikely.

  • acat

    he’s not a Northeastern Establishment guy. (Romney is, Giuliani is, Daniels and Barbour were close enough, having been in D.C. before…)

    Iowa is tough for Perry because, right now, it’s a crowded field.

    If Perry gets in and if Palin gets behind him, he’s still got to overcome the momentum of not having been “on the ground” before now. Acquiring the Gingrich campaign staff in Iowa lock, stock, and shoe leather, will cover part of the distance …. but not all. Perry is still going to have to get up there and work the retail politics …

    Mew

  • victrola

    Everyone likes to point to him being the “architect” of the Republican takeover in ’94, but Boehner actually won more seats in 2010. So how come no one calls Boehner an intellectual heavyweight that conservatives should marvel at?

    Newt was in the right place at the right time because Americans sharply rejected Bill Clinton and his liberal agenda. Newt then proceeded to royally screw up and throw temper tantrums because he thought he was America’s new Prime Minister.

    I’m fine with Newt at some Think Tank, but he doesn’t have the leadership qualities of a President, and his personal baggage would have disgusted even the most “open minded” of Americans.

  • gekster

    but right now I think they are just trying to get a place on the pedestal.
    And Romney appears to be on the top spot, so to say.
    In the fall, they will try to fight for the top spot on the pedestal, and thats when the the real fun begins.

  • gregorysstewart

    I just checked the calendar. Its June, and its really hot outside. Iowa has its caucus in February. New Hampshire has its primary shortly thereafter.

    In both of these contests, stalwart Republicans are the only ones who cast a vote. I really think that a large plurality of them will go where we have the best chance of winning. Base voters will also want a candidate that is fiscally conservative and socially conservative, popular with the mainstream Republicans and popular with the Tea Party. Perry is the rare combination of all of the above.

    Romney’s current 20 percent, top of the polls number is more recognition than conviction. When things get cold again, Republicans will certainly see the need to put someone in office that can return our country to the path of prosperity, and the continual example of Texas will make Perry a consensus candidate.

  • uselogic

    … about Newt. I would say that both he and Boehner benefitted from being at the right place and right time versus highly liberal agenda’s. The thing is, Newt’s Republican wave was after 40 years of being in the minority wilderness; a much bigger deal. Boehner, only 4 years out from a Rep majority in the House.

  • uselogic

    Right below this article’s teaser. I know the ads are random but it still made me chuckle.

  • uselogic

    Right below this article’s teaser. I know the ads are random but it still made me chuckle.

  • victrola

    Republicans took over in 1994 mainly because the South finally went from being Reagan Democrats to actual Republicans, Clinton was the final straw that broke the camel’s back. Couple that with a HUGE amount of retirements of old Blue Dogs and a banking scandal involving a large amount of incumbent Congressman, and the “feat” is suddenly not so impressive.

    The biggest component of the Contract with America was reforming welfare. I hardly think that was a new and fresh idea that came from Newt’s genius head, that had been a conservative cause since the program started, and even Bill Clinton campaigned in 1992 on making reforms.

    Again, had Newt been in a position of leadership at any other time, he would have been an obscure figure in politics. I don’t think he’s nearly as smart as he thinks he is, and everything I’ve seen over the last few months tells me conservatives need to cut bait with this opportunist ASAP.

  • MF

    I keep hearing that anyone can be Obama – look at what happened in 2010. That is completely ignoring the fact that, in spite of the Democrats’ high unfavorable positions, Obama doesn’t get that same level of dislike. I know, it’s impossible to comprehend, but a huge number of voters dislike the Democrat platform but like Obama and will vote for him anyway. We cannot be lured into believing 2010 is an indicator of 2012. Obama is still well-liked by many. That will translate into lots of votes, because a large number of people vote for a PERSON and not his or her PLATFORM.

  • jwebb

    Sorry, the tea party in Texas basically doesn’t like Perry all that much. Gardisil, Trans Texas Corridor, etc. Made him a Tea Party enemy. Of course, here in Texas many Tea Partiers are Ronulans with a Gadsen flag.

  • paramedichess

    I said that anyone CAN beat Obama, not that our candidate necessarily will. There are people out there saying that Obama cannot win re-election, and others saying that he cannot lose. At this point, both positions are ignorant. No one knows what will happen in the next 17 months. We would hit a double-dip recession, have unemployment at 11%, high inflation, and Obama gets destroyed. We could also have a slow but steady recovery, with unemployment back under 8%, gas prices falling, and Obama wins. Other factors such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks or new military conflicts could also weigh heavily on the results. My point in my earlier post was to say that it is wrong to argue that Romney or Pawlenty cannot beat Obama. If the economy continues to falter, and our candidate runs a careful campaign with no major gaffs, Obama probably loses.

  • gregorysstewart

    I disagree with this type of attack on Newt. I think he is not an opportunist. He is a real conservative, and his success came from bending when necessary, and posturing when necessary. He was a good leader for his party at that time. He is smart. He understands what he sees, and can articulate principled policies.

    That doesn’t make him a good candidate for president. He can have a role in this process. He is terrific on Fox News. Let him explain what is going on, along with Rove and Morris. His role is not as a candidate.

    Candidate Newt would need the discipline that real Newt doesn’t have. Candidate Newt would need to embrace 20 hour days and 7 day weeks in a way that real Newt can’t do anymore. Candidate Newt would have to have the kind of confidence in his team that you find when you let yourself fall into someone else’s outstretched arms. Real Newt ignores his team and does whatever he wants when he wants to.

    Real Newt is not a bad policy man, he is just not the right guy to run.

  • williamjameson

    even then its going to be hard to garner support from those who were alienated. Making decisions as a couple isn’t wise.

    I hope Rick Perry is committed to running. Erick said he wouldn’t run a couple of weeks ago, that was a great way to show Perry that RS members wanted him to run. Many still do! On a percentage basis, Rick Perry has create more jobs than Obama and he did it facing a declining economy with an industry hostile president. That says a lot about the governor.

    Conservatives need to find a way to convince Donald Trump to back off the idea of running 3rd party. He can’t win, the system is setup for red or blue to win, 3rd party will siphon votes. Plus this blow hard has given dems plenty of ammo to use against gop candidates. Trump is no conservative, more of a tyrant and clueless hack threatening to take the oil. We’re trying to wind down the war in Iraq, get with the program Trump, we pay our way in the USA. Negotiating for oil in lieu for future wars isn’t a bad idea.

  • peg_c

    No one can explain to me (convincingly) how Mitt runs against 0bamaCare, which is the very least all of us conservatives are demanding of our nominee. His stance on AGW and ethanol (given both ClimateFraud and the rising cost of corn and all the livestock dependent on it) make him virtually unelectable in my book. If he’s the nominee I have to vote for him, but I agree with Andrew Klavan that Mitt is the Death Star of the GOP.

  • peg_c

    And by the way, “bright” has lost any good connotation since being used so incessantly (by Republicans especially) to describe 0bama. It’s one of the reasons I won’t listen to or watch Rove anymore. Newt has strong personality and character defects, he’s arrogant and condescending, and he’s become an offputting, inside-the-beltway establishment GOP figure on too many issues. I paid very close attention to the Ryan brouhaha and just got disgusted with Newt and decided he was into self-sabotage. Idiotic, what he did. Dumbest smart man I’ve ever seen (outside of Clinton, and I’m still not convinced of his intellect).

  • red_oakster

    Iowa is a crowded field and Perry does not have the same appeal to social conservatives that others in the race do.

    If Perry can’t break through in Iowa, he will lose badly in New Hampshire where either the Iowa winner or Guiliani-type with battle Romney. In either case, Perry gets frozen out.

    If these things happen, I would expect to see South Carolina move towards one of the leading candidates. Perry will be perceived as someone who can’t win. Positionally, Perry’s situation looks a lot like Fred Thompson’s in 2008. Ironically, the enthusiasm for both at Red State also is similar.

  • red_oakster

    nt