Schultz is a moron. Boortz is a minor god and must suffer idiots like Ed from time to time.

he wouldn’t be a leftist otherwise. A psychopath doesn’t have conscience, if anything Schultz doubtless thinks he’s being clever.
Again, what’s new? After the Arizona shootings look what these nasty germs did to Palin, while they could work their slime before being caught by facts, which to Schultz and the rest, are as rat poison to rats.
What eats at these beasts is the opposition to excessive political power, a sort of grand punishment to be visited on us all.
They should be patient, get their rabies shots, double dose for Schultz, we may not have long to wait.

Boortz is right.

As for Ed Schultz, apparently he can’t think his way into or out of a controversy without cheating. Schultz wears a hat to warm his neck.

“I think Arbitron’s ratings are giving Ed Schultz a complex. ”

Ed has to learn to read before that can happen. And I doubt there could ever be anything complex about Mr. Ed. He’s just a horse from one end to the other.

Even my mom expressed to me just over the weekend that she wishes there were more people out there with guns to take care of these thugs. Of course she has always been a Republican, but I have never really heard her express her opinions on guns before.

“I have to admit this. On a personal level I like Ed Schultz. He’s friendly, garrulous – and fun to be around. He’s a pilot too. Oh yes .. he’s called me a psycho on the air, but I’m a forgiving kind of guy. His wife Wendy is a delight as well. ” – Neal Boortz (this comment was on the Laura Ingraham quote)

If Neal can like a guy who will say ANYTHING for ratings, what does that say about Neal,

Does Neal really mean what he says on the air, or is he like Schultz saying what he must for ratings.

As a Libertarian, I find that Schultz is something I would be in a hurry to scrape from the bottom of my shoe. I hope Neal is not the same.

I think he was just concerned about the mess left around Atlanta. Obviously, we’ll need the Atlanta Thug Corpse Removal System in place before we simply start dropping thugs all over the place. Good grief, have you ever been to Atlanta in the summer? Have a hear, you conservatives! By the way, would we be re-imbursed for our bullets?

I would say that what needs to happen is class action suit against MSNBC and Fat Eddy filed on behalf of listeners for suffering from being misinformed by outright lying.

If the FCC is going to regulate broadcast licenses, then their should be a reasonable expectation of fundamental veracity.

NBC’s selective editing problems are network-wide.

Whether it’s self-defense, or self-restraint, or self-chastisement, or self-consciousness, self-criticism, self-discipline, self-education, self-employed, self-examination, self-resourceful, self-sacrifice, self-starting, self-sufficient, you name it, it’s like a foreign language to them.

The only ones that seem to make it through are self-admiration and self-centered and self-delusion and self-indulgent.

I haven’t heard Boortz on the air since KNEW (San Francisco) dumped his show in the mid-’00s, but when I saw the clip on Breitbart.TV, I knew it was bullschultz, and that Mr. Ed was leaving out context to bolster the insane idea that Boortz was advocating murder of black men. I tried to find the entire clip on Boortz’s site, but couldn’t find one. I did note that the clips that were live on his homepage were interviews of Herman Cain. Funny how Schultz thinks a guy who wants white people to just start picking off black people would want to talk to a black GOP candidate for President.

One hilarious part of the clip: Schultz refers to “The View” co-host Elizabeth Hasselbeck as “ultra right-wing.”

More coming about the Schultz fraud on my blog.

Who will win? Her Ubermann or Sgt. Schultzie?

are syndicated for radio by the same company. Boortz says he is not going to let this die. It will be interesting to see how this goes. I’ll bet it will not bode well for schultz.

…has probably already deposited his MSNBC bonus check for this latest episode of left wing media journalistic integrity.

The point is, we cannot be judge, jury, and executioners by shooting someone with a gun when they appear to be a thug, and jack us for our car. We must not take the law into our own hands and instead we must report the incident to the police department and let law enforcement handle it.

Mr. Boortz, should have encouraged people to work with law enforcement when being car jacked instead of encouraging people to take up guns, getting permits, and receiving training to possibly have the streets of Atlanta littered with dead thugs.

Many of us our not qualified to take the law into our hands, but the police and judicial system are qualified. The police department in Atlanta is doing a good job of reducing crime in Atlanta.

most of us don’t know in advance whether the thug is only there for the car and won’t harm anyone in the process.  For the non-omniscient, I recommend Boortz’s approach.  

And by the way, there is no uncertainty in whether they ‘appear’ to be thug or not.  If they are robbing you, they are a thug (regardless of skin color).