« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Pledge Fatigue, My Butt

Republican leaders on Capitol Hill are pushing out stories, encouraging various media outlets to write about “pledge fatigue.”

This is in response to the Cut, Cap, Balance Pledge being pushed hard by conservative groups.

One reporter called me for comment and said several senior Republican offices on Capitol Hill had pointed to my recent posts on the pledge as evidence of fatigue.

Boy were they badly mistaken and, more so, allow us to confirm it is Republican leadership offices pushing the fatigue story for their own gain at the nation’s expense.

What I said was that I am tired of pledges that have no teeth. Conservatives in Washington often do pledges to avoid doing the hard work of beating liberal Republicans.

The real problem Republican Leaders have is that they just got burned with flaking out on their own pledge. They promised $100 billion in cuts, folded like a cheap suit under the slightest pressure, and now, instead of growing a spine and keeping their promises, have just decided to stop making any promises. This is the Mitch McConnell strategy: never announce what you are for, so no matter what you get you call it a victory.

Conservatives need to take note of this and up the ante dramatically.I think the Cut, Cap, Balance Pledge is great and strong, but I want conservatives who support it to pledge additionally to beat the hell out of any Republican who does not cut, cap, and balance before raising the debt ceiling.

Sadly, the Republican leaders are being helped by groups like Tea Party Patriots who are opposed to absolutely any increase in the debt ceiling — a position I love, but know will never happen. In fact, it is the knowledge that the debt ceiling will be increased that led to the Cut, Cap, Balance Pledge — force real and sizable cuts, cap spending, and pass a Balanced Budget Amendment before raising the debt ceiling.

With a handful of groups saying they hate the pledge because it allows an eventual debt ceiling increase and Republican leaders saying there is “pledge fatigue”, conservatives seem to be in a tough bind.

But when you break it down, you see that the “never raise the debt ceiling” folks are well meaning, but fighting against a tide that will overcome them. The real issue here are the leadership folks trying to undermine this pledge.

Why?

Because it boxes in their negotiating room. Ultimately, in Washington, leaders cut deals that more often than not sell out the American people. Republican Leaders are ready to sell out their base.

By putting teeth into the Cut, Cap, Balance Pledge and having conservatives in Congress hold the freaking line, it will be much more difficult and painful for the GOP to fold.

As a result, GOP leaders must get it out there that there is pledge fatigue. Otherwise, they would have to be honest and admit they are just scared of conservatives right now.

Likewise, conservatives need to pay attention to and capitalize on this fear. Now is the time for conservatives to up the ante and pledge scorched earth on Republicans who raise the debt ceiling without first cutting spending significantly, imposing enforceable caps on spending, and passing the Lee-Cornyn-Hatch Balanced Budget Amendment a/k/a the Walsh BBA for you House guys.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.wojworld.com The Only Woj

    It has to be voted on, passed and signed before any vote takes place to raise the debt ceiling. Anything less is a surrender. In fact, I’d be perfectly fine with giving the Democrats tax increases in exchange for the Balanced Budget Amendment to be signed by the President and set to the states for ratification. Let the Democrats sink the economy. We’ll take ownership of the BBA; let them take ownership of crippling tax increases (that can always be repealed in future sessions should we retake the Senate).

  • davesinsanantonio

    They will blame it on the Republicans just like they do any violence that they can, even when it is a lefty that does it. (they claim it is OUR rhetoric or campaign literature that caused it.) So, the sheep will still vote for them because it is easier for them to accept the Dem lies than to actually think. That is why we have to tell the truth loudly, strongly, and constantly, so some of the sheep will eventually get it and we can still win the election.

  • davesinsanantonio

    I am so tired of the wimpy RINO weasels who are more concerned with beating conservatives and defeating conservative principles than they are in saving this country.
    I really don’t care how fatigued they are, let them get a good long rest after they are defeated in the primary, and then we can do the actual work of saving the Republic.

  • http://tomcox.wordpress.com tenntom

    Assuming Congress secures an agreement to reduce spending in exchange for raising the debt ceiling, how are the spending cuts to be enforced? Obama routinely ignores Congress and the courts when convenient
    When he laughs off the budget cuts, then what? Will the leadership stamp its little foot and threaten to throw a serious hissy fit? Will Boehner cry? Will McConnell issue a civil, but strongly-worded scolding? Oooh, that’ll scare ‘em.

  • tonylaz

    Can’t refuse to raise the debt ceiling? Can’t refuse to spend more than you have? Baloney! Families who’ve overspent do it every day. Get in the real world!

  • donrsherwood

    Erick, PLEASE NAME NAMES!

    We need to bombard these RINO Republican “leaders” with messages to change or get out of the way.

    I’m tired of hearing about “mysterious Repubican leaders”. I want to take ACTION against these JERKS, NOW! They are killing the Repuiblican Party, as they have been for YEARS. It has to stop!

  • Marcus_Traianus

    Sure, they hem and haw on the Sunday shows to create some convincing theater in the process. But it is largely a tactical, fictional act. Everybody, including Democrats, are certain they will fold like a lawn chair in a hurricane once it gets to the deadline.

    Expect a deal that Obama?s golfing buddy-Boehner and conniving McConnell will try to sell as middle-of-the-road. Also expect that with this type of behavior, they will get Obama re-elected and remain a minority in the Senate. They like it and frankly this crop of so-called ?leaders? are nothing but followers and partisans. They don?t hold the same values as conservatives or a majority of Americans for that matter. They use our values as a means to gain support for their hidden, parochial agenda then stick us with excuses when they reach a deal.

    Democrats need a deal which works in their political favor. Republican establishment members want a deal for their own, selfish, parochial purposes. The American people need a deal which preserves the financial integrity of our country, improves the outlook for our children and rolls back the egregious assault on our way of life. Who is wrong in that recitation? Certainly not us.

    It?s time for us to realize as Americans, Republicans and
    Conservatives we are out there on our own. Boehner, McConnell and the old guard leadership WILL NOT assist us. They don?t represent us, don?t hold the same values and will retreat to save their own skins. They have no temerity, loyalty or cogent plan. They believe that we the people are extremists, especially conservatives. It is truly time for both of them to go.

  • jtlfromfredmd

    either of these guys? Oops, I forgot Boehner’s tears after the election. This group is just as responsible for pulling our country down the tubes as the Democratic Party. It’s getting more and more difficult to quell the anger that I harbor for this bunch of politicians masquerading as our representatives. The jig is up. We never should have – and I repeat – NEVER should have arrived at the place where we find ourselves now. They (all of them) have ruined the once, and great, USA!!

  • acat

    Fortunately, there’s a cure. More tea.

    Mew

  • Wubbies World

    … is a fatigue of these gutless wonders with having to deal with us annoying voters. Now they are looking for the escape hatch so they can be good lapdogs for the Democrats.

    Hey, Bob Michal was happy in the minority as long as he got table scraps and tee times with with the Tip ONeil. The bunch we have now are just as gutless.

  • Warrior

    Cut from the same, go-along-to-get-along, let’s-make-a-deal cloth.

    To paraphrase the SEIU:

    “Hey hey, ho ho, country club RINO’s have got to go!”

  • http://www.flaliberty.org scorpio0679

    Bachmann seems to hold to this kind of line. It isn’t that opposing the debt ceiling is a bad thing . . . . I am against it as well . . . . but how do you accomplish your policy objectives in the real world? Bachmann is very idealistic about good, conservative principles but without a plan of how to achieve those objectives in the real world.

    That’s what I absolutely LOVE about Jim DeMint.

    I’ve been advocating tying a balanced budget amendment since early January here at RedState – here and here.

    This absolutely needs to be done.

  • funwithknives

    Not if JOHN-BEE and Mitch have much to do with our recovery from *finding the bottom*. Where are the body parts(Spine and ‘Nads) needed for them to go at this for real. No More FLA-SID-IT-EE. Time is out, folks. Time to go and let em know where we all stand, as there just might not be “another chance”. Four more Barry years?Use your imagination and envision his purported NEW MANDATE, IFFIN’ HE WINS. Call this vision “incentive”,and use it like a tool. “The Fight for Liberty is Never-Ending”,isn’t just a slogan. Can we do less than Those who gave Their All to get us to this place in time? The Battle is Joined….. and face facts, WE’RE IT.

  • 1volunteer

    It would shift power over taxing and spending away from the people’s representatives to the executive and judicial branches. Fiscal responsibility is possible under the Constitution as it is, if Congress would limit spending to the federal government’s enumerated powers. If they are not limited by the Constitution as it reads now, they will not be limited by it after amendment.

    Publius Huldah’s latest essay addresses the dangers of this proposed amendment. (I hold that Publius Huldah has as good an understanding of our constitution as anyone now living.) publiushuldah.com

  • acat

    To be blunt, the BBA as presented doesn’t move power of the purse away from the lower house .. it restricts what they can allocate money for, but that’s it.

    Mew

  • ihateliberals

    never announce what you are for, so no matter what you get you call it a victory”. This sounds scarily like a Democrat. I guess tht is why they call them RINO’s. Stating that there is leadership in the Republican party is like saying Jesse Jackson is a member of the KKK. There is only “Cave-in-manship” . Electing Boehner the speaker of the house was a huge mistake made by the Tea Party. I know they were young and inexperienced but it’s been 6 months now and it is time for them to rare up and take charge. The way things are going you would think that the Democrats won last November. Who is the chairman of the RNC now? Prius, Probost, Princes ahh who cares he isn’t doing anything anyway. I think the Republican Party is about to go the way of the Whigs. If the alleged learship doesn’t standup for what the people want the party is going to split. My fear now is tht this will happen before the 2012 election of which Obama would then win for sure.

  • Ausonius

    Marcus Traianus is quite right: for too many Republicans the idea is to keep playing nicely on the teeter-totter, so that everybody can keep going up and down…and going nowhere in the end, except to stay on the teeter-totter through incumbency.

    In the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War,” there is a scene where Wilson (Tom Hanks) is talking with a renegade CIA analyst/operative (Phillip Hoffmann) about Afghanistan in the 1980′s. A CIA bureaucrat is against the idea of arming Afghans with modern technology against the Soviets, and the Wilson character asks: “What’s the matter with him? Doesn’t he want to win the Cold War?” To which the response from the analyst is: “No, he just wants the Soviets to bleed slowly.”

    In other words, keep the game going, because that will mean your position will remain stable. Victory would mean that you would be unemployed!

    We see this with “our” long-term Republican “leaders” right now.

  • ihateliberals

    The Democratic Party , The Republican RINO party and the Republican Conservative Party which is the old GOP. The problem right now is that the Republican RINO Party seems to be in charge. Where are the Conservatives of the Party? Why so quite right now? Where are the Conservative people? Why isn’t anyone speaking out and take care of these traitors to our Country. I know I am afraid of a party split right now but I fear that it is coming if the sleeping giant of Conservatives don’t take control of the House and the Senate and put these RINO’s to rest.

  • 1volunteer

    what they can allocate money for. They ignore it, as they will with the BBA.

    Details: The proposed amendment specifies that the President will write the budget, specifying a new constitutional power for the executive branch. Be assured that some president will try under the provisions of the BBA to order tax increases. He would likely be challenged. If the SCOTUS has a majority of liberals, they will interpret the BBA to give him/her the power to do it. In any event, the federal courts will be exercised often to interpret the amendment, and I am confident that activists will be activists. They will not restrict their interpretation to the intent of the framers. They have proved that. The result will be more power in the hands of the President and courts, less in the hands of the House of Representatives.

    The bottom line is this: The amendment will actually authorize the federal government to spend money on whatever it decides it wants to as guided by the President. The Constitution as it stands strictly limits the federal government to enumerated powers. If the people ever wake up and enforce the Constitution, this restriction will save us. It would be very hard for the nation’s spending to even approach 18% of GDP. With the BBA, there is no hope; we will have given away the principle of enumerated powers.

    I don’t want to push Publius Huldah here; I want to push the Constitution as written and ratified by the states. However, if you don’t read some of what she has to say, it’s your loss. She has studied extensively the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers and is a strong advocate for the original intent of the founders.

  • acat

    Even Obama did that much.

    The proposal is not unconstitutional, the requirements are merely that the House are where the budget must first be passwd. They can vote through a blank check today and it’s perfectly constitutional .. and it often seems like they do just that.

    I do not see where the BBA takes away the ability of the House to explicitly fund or de-fund programs. If it does so in fact, that’s a problem .. but if the whole argument is built on what someone or some court *might* do, then .. it’s crap.

    Mew

  • Scope

    about Bachmann saying the great conservative things that we all love hearing, but, what visions does she or any of the candidates have, in trying to push that policy forward.

    After the Wallace “flake” comment while interviewing her, that is all anyone took away from that interview. It seems that most want to believe that they were the only words said. I quit watching Wallace when he started having John Podesta on the Sunday panel. After hearing all the screaming about Wallace asking her if she was a flake, I watched the afternoon time slot of his show. I came away scratching my head, and wondering if she was for or against gay marriage.

    Wallace played a video of her supporting a Constitutional Amendment for the Defense of Marriage Act. Marriage is between one man and one woman she proclaimed. Then she went on later to say that a president Bachmann would not try to change state laws that have passed gay marriage legislation. Wallace said he was confused, so was I.

    She told Wallace that states can pass any laws they want to. That isn’t true. And, if she managed to get a Constitutional Amendment defining marriage between one man, and one woman, that would trump, and make obsolete any state gay marriage laws.

    http://spectator.org/archives/2011/06/28/bachmann-and-gay-marriage

    My honest view of her seeming to want to have it both ways is that she doesn’t want to lose support of those who are strongly for state’s rights on one hand, which is much of the Tea Party people, and she doesn’t want to harm her position as a strong social conservative. At some point she will have to decide where her loyalties lie, because right now they contradict one another.

  • 1volunteer

    The Constitution empowers the House to make the budget. Again, these are the representatives of the people. The President is not. If what they want is a balanced budget, they should balance it. Publius Huldah addresses this.

  • acat

    That is, to *pass* a budget. Or, if you prefer, to pass *a* budget.

    Once they vote it through, they fulfill their obligation to “make” a budget, whether they wrote it or whether they rubber-stamped someone elses’.

    Unless the BBA fundamentally changes this – and I do not see how it does – then Huldah is arguing a point not in evidence.

    Mew

  • YnotNOW

    the Federal Government has ALREADY spent more money and incurred more debt than the debt ceiling allows. Geitner has juggled the books to cover for a few more weeks, doing things like holding off putting $$ into Civil Service Retirement accounts (which is required by law), and therefore must be paid sooner or later. And that requires borrowing. Because we (via our Government) have ALREADY SPENT IT.

    And that is assuming you could balance the budget tomorrow – without a singe dollar of deficit spending. Reform Medicare/Medicaid/Social Security, plus everything else we’ve got laws about. In one day.

    Sorry, not gonna happen. Sad but true in the Real World. So instead, use the leverage to create REAL change, that will allow us to balance the budget in the future (in a realistic and not “government promise” way).

  • http://www.flaliberty.org scorpio0679

    NT