« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Barack Obama’s George Bush Problem

Barack Obama has a George Bush problem. This is not a W problem, but an H. W. problem.

Back in 1991, George H. W. Bush’s approval rating went up to between 89% and 91% in February of that year. He was on a high from winning the Iraq War.

The Democrats were confounded and had no real answer to put up as an alternative. There was a free for all. But something started happening to President Bush — gravity in the polling.

Despite the war success, the country was in the tank. Making matters worse, his base felt he’d sold them down the river exchanging tax increases after they’d read his lips for spending cuts that never materialized. The right wanted nothing to do with him and the left hated him.

In short, after winning a war and seeing historic job approval ratings, his base decided he was a sell out and the left disagreed with his policies.

His polling fell 30 points in about 4 months and further nosedived into the high twenties by July of 1992. It was the economy stupid — and the perception that George H. W. Bush was a terrific guy, but a terrible leader.

Now we have this whining piece from Emorhoid pschy professor Drew Westen to this bit of contempt and pity from Dana Milbank. Both are about Barack Obama’s failure of leadership.

A lot of people are looking to the election of 1980 and Carter vs. Reagan. Today, Bill McGurn goes there.

But I maintain, and have for a while, that Barack Obama has a George H. W. Bush problem and the closest parallel is the election of 1992. But with either analogy, Barack Obama has a very real problem.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • davesinsanantonio

    Obummer can exemplify both the worst in Carter and the worst in Bush 41 at the same time. Now all he needs is a crazy attack rabbit and things would be complete.
    The one thing I fear about the Obummer presidency is that when he leaves in disgrace in ’13, that he will be asked on all kinds of supposed news shows to pontificate as if he actually knows something, just as they do with Jimmy Peanut now. I do not want to see this guy’s snarky face or smarmy fake smile or hear his inane chatter for the rest of my life. But, maybe without his teleprompters his ignorance and his disdain for America and its citizens will shine through, and they will quit asking him to appear. It could happen! Or, maybe, since they are True Believers, they will just supply him with a teleprompter off camera. Or, since they share his disdain, maybe even on camera. But, my dream is him and his missus fading off into obscurity.
    “Wadda maroon! Wadda ignoranamous!” to quote a famous cultural observer and philosopher.

  • jiminga

    is finally obvious to his mainstream media adoration club. The WaPo piece pointing out his leadership failure makes one think about why they didn’t vet him when he was running for office.

    Not only does he have no solutions, he has surrounded himself with advisors that are just as devoid of workable ideas. We can only pray that events don’t completely overpower him before we can get a real President in office.

    “Leading from behind” is sure to become a real course of study in future political science studies.

  • gwalt

    Will be himself. I don’t believe even Moochelle takes him seriously. The media will trot him out as some expert, but by then the American people, with more than two synapse firing, will tune him out.
    How many books written about Carters failed presidency? How many written about how great he was? I have a couple on his failures. Can’t recall one on how great he was unless he wrote it himself.
    My guess is we will see a lot more books about how we were had rather than how great he was.

  • bk

    is to have someone well-known primary him from the left. They will plan it in a way so as not to fatally injure him a la Kennedy to Carter, but rather to allow Obama to look more like a centrist. In the end, the liberals will vote for him no matter what. The hope is that they trick a some independents into giving him another chance.

  • bk

    is that there is a huge burn-out rate among the left. They have burned through tens of millions of dollars and millions of man-hours oops I mean person-hours fighting in Wisconsin and other states. Then next year they’ll be told they have to work ever harder or else everything they had fought for will be lost. How long can some of those people keep up that level of energy, and will unions and other liberal groups have to end up spending less than they hoped because they’ve burned through so much dough already?

  • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

    He still has his media shills … the bowing Brian Williams comes immediately to mind. All one has to do is look at that terrible cover photo of Michelle Bachman on “Newsweak” or listen to the blather from La-La-Land’s Matt Damon to realize BOzo still has supporters.

  • gunslingr45

    “IS” in my book.

    ?If you can?t support our troops feel free to get out in front of them.?

  • The_Gadfly

    There are too many committed Marxists in the Democrat party, particularly vis-a-vie primaries. Run somebody from the loony left to prop up The Big 0′s centrism, and you could wind up with Governor Moonbeam on the ballot. That might work in California where there are still too many loons voting, but it won’t work as a national strategy.

  • The_Gadfly

    I think The Big 0 has a Bush Senior problem with his base, and a Jimmy “the peanut farmer” Carter problem with the country.

    Not a good place to be in. Not good at all. The only thing that makes his problem less severe, is while Republicans shoot their injured (Trent Lott, Newt Gingrich, Ted Stevens), Democrats rally round to protect them (Bill Clinton).

  • acat

    Hot Air picked it up. Someone *is* thinking of primarying Obama .. from the left.

    Mew

  • The_Gadfly

    I change the channel, even if he isn’t making a personal appearance, so yes.

    Right now it’s all sound and fury signifying nothing. It keeps the rubes happy. When push comes to shove, they’ll keep the opposition off the ballot. Just look at all the odd things that happened in The Big 0′s house races.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    but then that would take acceptance of responsibility as a first step towards dealing with it…

    When the dem smear machine tries to do to Romney what it tried to do with Palin will there be a bigger backlash?

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    He can register as a Republican and run on both sides of the ticket in primaries – win both and then run against himself (former mayor of Harrisburg did this repeatedly – is it any wonder that city is in the tank?)…

    Of course if the O runs against himself he still might lose… like the rest of us…

  • acat

    After all, Obama wasn’t supposed to be the 2008 nominee…

    Not like he kept Hillary off the ballot, nor could he do so again if she ran.

    More importantly, there’s a sweet opportunity for anyone who gets shoved off the ballot to tap all the birther angst and demand Obama be ditched as well.

    It’s BS, cat is no birfer, but .. the angst is there, waiting to be used.

    Mew

  • The_Gadfly

    but he was little different than Hillary. The biggest difference is Hillary is a more Machiavellian, which scares me more.

    Yes Nader is enough of a loon to run on a third party. But he’s done that enough that the last time he got about as much of the vote as the guy actually running on whatever name the doctrinaire communists are using over here.

  • The_Gadfly

    the other day that says he’s polling very, very, very badly among the youth vote. For some inexplicable reason they hold him accountable for their bad economic outlook these days.

  • bk

    being an idealist college student to being an unemployed college graduate with a bunch of student loans to pay off that can change one’s perspective a bit.

    In a somewhat similar fashion, it wasn’t until talking to black friends after the 2008 election that I realized how important it was to them to have voted for the first black president. Not even counting however many might stay home or vote differently due to real world disenchantment, surely there are some who won’t feel the same gut feel to vote for him again – we’ve already got the first black president, so there is nothing groundbreaking to be had now.

  • clintonformccain

    The black vote will rally around their guy against all the “racist” attacks on his leadership.

  • congressworksforus

    Sorry Eric but you are way over-analyzing this.

    Obama is done. Toast. Kaput. Finito.

    You spend your days talking to fellow Republicans and Red-Staters. I spend my day talking to Independents.

    He’s finished. Over. Buh-bye.

    Stop giving him a freaking lifeline for God’s sake.