« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

PolitiFact Proves Yet Again It Is a Left Wing Attack Machine With Nonpartisan Veneer

“Politifact’s fact is nothing more than their left-wing hypothesis disconnected from and ignoring every data point that doesn’t help them make their case.”

As a general rule of thumb I heard somewhere, fact checkers don’t check facts.

Fact checkers exist to put an objective, nonpartisan veneer on whatever some reporter wants to say. And when fact checkers take it upon themselves to be arbiters of truth, they use their own biases. One of the worst is Politifact, which the media now hides behind routinely to give cover to a left-of-center spin on truth.

There is an egregious example today over the number of doctors in Texas and whether tort reform mattered.

According to Politifact, tort reform did not impact the number of doctors in Texas.

There is no question that tort reform drove down medical malpractice insurance premiums and reduced the number of malpractice suits. And there is no question that most health care providers like the change and say it’s a factor that leads them to practice in the state. But the wholesale transformation that Perry describes is not backed up by the numbers.

Perry said Texas has 21,000 more doctors thanks to tort reform. That’s flat out wrong. Texas has only about 13,000 more doctors in the state and the historic trends suggest that population growth was the driving factor. We rate his statement False.

Politifact chose to rely on many sources that could be considered left-leaning, some with real axes to grind with Rick Perry over budget cuts.

Politifact also ignored that, well, doctors retire and also the number of out of state medical licenses are down, while Texas originated medical licenses are up.

Oh, and there is one left leaning source the Politifact chose to ignore entirely — the New York Times.Contrary to Politifact, back in 2007, the New York Times titled an article, “More Doctors in Texas After Malpractice Caps”. It went on to report

In Texas, it can be a long wait for a doctor: up to six months.

That is not for an appointment. That is the time it can take the Texas Medical Board to process applications to practice.

Four years after Texas voters approved a constitutional amendment limiting awards in medical malpractice lawsuits, doctors are responding as supporters predicted, arriving from all parts of the country to swell the ranks of specialists at Texas hospitals and bring professional health care to some long-underserved rural areas.

The influx, raising the state’s abysmally low ranking in physicians per capita, has flooded the medical board’s offices in Austin with applications for licenses, close to 2,500 at last count.

How convenient Politifact chose to ignore an article written in a year when Rick Perry was not running for office and opponents had no axe to grind to hurt his political electability.

It’s not just the New York Times Politifact chose to ignore. How about the Houston Chronicle.

Dozens of Texas ER doctors swarmed Capitol Hill this week to tell lawmakers that the Lone Star State has just the prescription for what ails a health-care industry burdened by runaway costs: limiting big-bucks lawsuits against physicians.

That’s what Texas did in 2003, when the Legislature placed a cap on the so-called “noneconomic” damages that can be awarded in medical liability cases. The reform’s supporters say it protects doctors from “frivolous” lawsuits that ultimately drive up insurance premiums – and also makes the state an enormously popular destination for doctors, a key selling point as experts warn the nation may need 150,000 more physicians to treat the newly insured once the federal health-care law takes effect.

Or what about the Wall Street Journal where Joe Nixon the Texas Public Policy Foundation noted, “Over the past three years, some 7,000 M.D.s have flooded into Texas, many from Tennessee.”

Or what about the Texas Academy of Family Physicians. Though Politifact did have a chat with the head of the group, and the head of the group did attribute growth to population, Politifact chose to ignore that TAFP also attributes the growth in doctors to tort reform.

Along with an influx of carriers is a dramatic increase in the number of physician license requests, including a “record number” from out-of-state doctors. The Texas Medical Board received 4,026 new physician license applications in fiscal 2006, which ran from Sept. 1, 2005 to Aug. 31, 2006. In 2001, the Board received only 2,446 applications. The numbers for half of 2007 have already nearly surpassed those for all of 2001—reaching 2,423 as of March with more than 2,700 licenses pending.

Out of the new licenses granted in 2006, 42 percent went to out-of-state physicians, 31 percent went to Texas physicians and 27 percent went to international physicians, according to statistics from TMA’s Medical Education Division.

Oh, and then of course there is the Texas Medical Association’s own graph, which paints the detail in striking terms:

TAPA Newly Lic TexPhysician

But, you know, it’s all population growth according to Politifact. If we are to believe them, then they ought to go through other states that saw population growth like Texas and did not enact and do not have Texas style tort reform.

I’m not actually sure such a place exists. Until it does, Politifact’s fact is nothing more than their left-wing hypothesis disconnected from and ignoring every data point that doesn’t help them make their case.

COMMENTS

  • irishgirl

    is being sent to PolitiFact…..

  • http://www.WILLisms.com WILLisms

    Another good Joe Nixon line: “Thanks for the doctors, New York”

    According to the Texas Medical Board records, we?ve picked up 1,271 New York physicians since September 2003, when Texas voters approved the Proposition 12 medical-liability reforms.

    Overall, our state has nearly 26,000 more physicians than the 33,000 in practice pre-Prop 12. The vast majority moved from other states.

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/thanks_for_the_doctors_new_york_sC24DBxeqpvpApNcd0x5IP

    Politifarce, they should be called.

  • DerKrieger

    …documented impact on the cost of health care due to the increased number of physicians hopefully having to compete for business?

  • erodotos

    is even coherent.

    “Politifact chose to rely on many sources that could be considered left-leaning, some with real axes to grind with Rick Perry over budget cuts.” of the three named sources, i suppose all of them “could be” considered left-leaning, but no one actually would: all three (the texas medical association, the texas academy of family physicians, and texas alliance for patient access) supported and lobbied for the 03 law, all three are funded by health care providers. those are the people politifact is getting their numbers from.

    bizarrely you even call the texas academy of family physicians “one of the independent doctors groups Politifact chose to ignore,” when they are in fact of one the three sources they do use: “Tom Banning, chief executive officer of the Texas Academy of Family Physicians, said that …”

    i’m not sure how the fact that “doctors retire” could have anything to do with this argument, so i can’t address it.

    of the three other sources you cite, only one of them, the NYT, actually connects growth in number of doctors with tort reform. the houston chronicle is obviously quoting “The reform?s supporters” throughout the passage you cite, but you present it as if this were the chronicle’s own conclusions. finally the wsj source you quote of course says nothing at all about tort reform, only that texas has more doctors now, which politifact admits throughout its article. i’m paywalled from the wsj article, but the source they quote in their story works for an organization that actually would be described as right-leaning (“The Foundation?s mission is to promote and defend liberty, personal responsibility, and free enterprise in Texas”), and obviously the wsj is right-leaning editorially, yet you seem to view this guy’s quote as proof that “even the liberal media!” agree with you and disagree with politifact.

    you don’t even address one of politifact’s two claims, namely that perry was false about the number of doctors that could even plausibly be ascribed to tort reform: of the 21,000 perry cites, fewer than 13,000 actually practice in texas; clearly tort reform has nothing to do with that. perry was off by at least that much, off by more than 33%, but you have nothing to say about that. you also expend no effort disputing their central claim: that, when the number of doctors grows by 24% in a state with 20% population growth, it should be easily understood by all that no where near all of those new doctors should be chalked up to some bit of public policy. even the high-end figure of the tort-reform-supporting texas alliance for patient access is that exactly 5,000 of those 13,000 can explained by tort reform alone; the same guy’s low end figure is 1,600. as politifact’s other tort-reform-supporting source admits, “Go where the money is. From a doctor?s standpoint, you go where the patients are.”

    you don’t pay attention to any of that in your article, you just claim what politifact’s story “proves” and then go on to either completely neglect or misrepresent what they actually say, and to adduce a few quotes from other sources that don’t make the point you seem to think they do.

  • gekster

    The HuffPo is out the door ant to the left.
    We are here to promote conservative values.
    Not to give lip service to those who want give Obama an excuse for failing.

    ( this is more in response to his other comment, but applies somewhat to this one also)

  • erodotos

    anything about whether i support tort reform or not. all of it was about why the above argument is bad, not liberal advocacy. same thing about my other comment. can you object to something i said in the comment here?

  • gekster

    As it plainly shows,
    1. you didn’t read the article,
    2. you did read the article, and didn’t understand it.
    3. you are a lefty, and as such can’t understand it.
    I could be wrong, I usually am,
    but nothing more need be said.

  • erodotos

    saying things without giving any real reasons for them. which is also what i said the above post does.

  • Scope

    to not feed the ghouls? The more anyone responds to them, the more microphone time they get. And, it is unlikely many if any of them will ever see things through a conservative lens, or perascope.

  • Scope

    periscope? Not sure.

  • erodotos

    think you could get more people to agree with you if you could give reasons for the things you’re saying? and wouldn’t it be a good thing to get more people to agree with you?

  • runner12

    You can ask anyone in the health care field and they will tell you that without a doubt torte reform drives down health care costs. Texas is leading the way in this area and more states need to follow suit.

    I might also add that Texas is home to some of the most prominent hospitals in the region. Texas Children’s, Baylor Medical, and MD Anderson to name a few.

  • dkinchi

    My wife’s cousin is a Neurosurgeon. He left Chicago for Texas 8 years ago specifically because of Texas’ reform. In Chicago, he simply couldn’t afford the malpractice insurance, especially as a newer doctor, that had to build his practice. Their family here in Chicago is very large and tight knit, and we all felt a loss when he had to move to Texas, but we also understood….
    What I couldn’t believe when I was talking to him is that he is fighting 3-8 malpractice lawsuits on any given day on an ongoing daily basis.

  • gekster

    ya caught me.
    I can’t spell.
    And I said my piece to whats his name.
    I’ve had enough fun with trolls lately.
    I’ll let someone else play with him.

  • pttx333

    some of the most prominent hospitals but the ones you mention go far beyond the region. In particular, the Texas Medical Center in Houston, where those hospitals are located along with numerous others (St. Luke’s, Hermann, Methodist, etc.), goes far beyond the region. People from all over the world come here for the some of the latest specialilzed treatment available anywhere. In fact, the world-renowned hospitals have translators who speak many, many languages which are spoken in countries across the world. As far as that goes, Texas has many fine hospitals all over the state. In no way am I taking anything away from other equally advanced hospitals all over the nation, it is just that for years Texas has been far more advanced in the medical field than many people realize.

  • pttx333

    are always busier than one-armed paper hangers, bless their little pointed heads. Though it certainly isn’t cricket to be an ambulance chaser, they go around that with ‘runners’ who make the rounds of traffic accidents, latest tv reports, newspaper stories, yada yada. Doctors in particular are so vulnerable, and it would seem that some patients intentionally go to the doctors looking for the least little thing with which to sue the ‘deep pockets.’ Hopefully, much of this will drop off significantly with Texas’ recent ‘loser pays’ law. Having personally witnessed the shenanigans of said trial lawyers, all I can say is hallelujah and amen.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    one of the worst states in the union for outrageous class action suits and big damages. This is a concrete reform that Perry can run on to try and bring to the rest of the nation.

  • pttx333

    it but on the good side – the defense against the monsters. Texas was literally lawsuits run amok and in cahoots with the good ole boys (wink, wink) back in the day. Venue shopping was rampant with Beaumont being a particular favorite of the trial lawyers. Most juries/judges there just rubber-stamp any claim to ‘get the evil big boys’ (insurance companies, oil companies, etc.). Or they did – being out of the loop these days is frustrating in that I’m not sure what is taking place since the reform, but I can sure testify as. The class actions are/were particularly egregious – we had 7,500 plaintiffs suing over 50 companies at one point in one of the silliest cases ever brought. Hopefully, these will now disappear, but it is going to tough for Perry/conservatives to fight the trial guys – they’re mighty dirty for the most part.

  • williamjameson

    You are a ghoul and you are a troll. Nuff said! Trolls like you infest well run sites that adhere to a policy of honesty and integrity, something you wouldn’t understand.

    Your piss poor punctuation and dumbfounded responses all lean you to the hard left where lying is as common as your desires to steal the future while blaming someone else.

    Btw, you didn’t read the article, that’s so obvious that even your HuffBlo buddies would snicker at, but only because they are gullible suckers just like you. Too lazy to read and uneducated followers of the fake messiah.

  • allidoischeckfacts2011

    Politifact made a mistake in the numbers

    I just checked the Texas medical board statistics.

    In January 2003 the amount of “active instate” doctors was 37188.

    Source: http://www.tmb.state.tx.us/agency/statistics/demo/docs/d2003/0103/inout.php

    In May 2011 the amount of “active instate” doctors was 49976.

    Source: http://www.tmb.state.tx.us/agency/statistics/demo/docs/d2011/0511/inout.php

    49976 minus 37188 equals 12788.

    Politifact correctly states that “the accurate increase is 12,788. That?s about 8,000 doctors fewer than the governor?s claim.”

    But then Politifact says this:

    “From 2002 to 2010, the population of Texas grew by 20 percent. At the same time, the number of doctors went up 24 percent. ”

    This is wrong. And it is wrong because they used the wrong data to chart the increase.

    FACT: There were 12,788 new “active instate” doctors between 2003 and 2011.

    FACT: As a proportion of 37,188 (the 2003 amount of “active instate” doctors”), 12,788 equals a 34.4% increase in doctors. While some increase in doctors naturally came about due to population increase (assuming politifact is correct in saying that population increased in Texas by 20% between 2002-2010) the difference between 20% and 34.4% is rather stark.

    WHERE POLITIFACT GOT IT WRONG: They used the wrong number. They ended up comparing the 12,788 new “active instate” doctors to the 2003 figure of 52,387 “total” doctors (“active/inactive, instate/out of state”). This results in a figure of 24.4%.

    So Politifact got it wrong, but, then again, so did Perry. Perry overestimated the number.

  • gekster

    Welcome to Red State.
    When you get to know us, you will wonder why you ever came. ;)

  • runner12

    substituted region lest someone think I was forgetting other notable medical institutions around the country :) .

  • Adjoran

    Politifact cited the group’s leader. He is contradicted by TAPF’s official statements.

    Now it is fine if they wish to accept the leader’s personal opinion, but if they are going to identify him as the leader of the TAPF, they should at least note his position isn’t the official position of the group, and that the group’s opinion is in fact the opposite.

    Instead, they accord him the authority of being the leader of TAPF and implied his position is the group’s.

    This is not what you do if you are trying to be honest.

  • pttx333

    hospitals all over the country. Thank heavens for them. Even in the Houston area in Clear Lake City where NASA is located, they are creating quite a nice medical community there. Lubbock, TX, and Texas Tech are coming to the forefront in medicine. Good news is, once we clean out all the morons, the entire nation will shine brighter and business will begin to grow again.

  • h4ckrn00b

    the NYT article was from FOUR years ago! Much has changed since.

  • spainishirish

    Why the idiots (if this were the Ace of Spades another word or two would be used) who represent the GOP in negotiating debate moderation agreed is beyond comprehension.

  • jaykali

    I used to read a health care blog during the debate by a doctor and all the liberals would say tort reform and selling across state lines won’t do anything. They so quickly dismissed ideas that could help. They also tend to dismiss the idea that regulations and taxes on business stifle business and job creation. Liberals have it all figured out, see the 2008 Stimulus.

    Liberals like to wear the ‘intellectual’ label as if it exclusively applies to them but I am here to say they don’t know what in the hell they’re talking about. They just parrot talking points they hear in the echo chamber.

    And that is troubling to me bc tort reform is a good example. To the average liberal constituent why do they care that trial lawyers will lose money? I understand why politicians would care but the average hipster liberal supporter wouldn’t. But they are so brainwashed by their huffpo daily talking points they can’t see that these smaller ideas could really help. Once republicans can set the agenda I think it’s going to be difficult for liberals to make the opposition argument. Things like:

    1. Balanced budget amendment
    2. Smaller health care reforms, insurance across state lines, tort reform, etc.
    3. Opening up domestic drilling, etc.

    I think the republicans have a chance to get a lot done year one if they can win the white house and senate.

  • popster

    much, why are most of the doctors I used to see moving out of Massachusetts? Gee could it be thier policies and the lack of tort reform?

  • edintexas

    Am I simply confused, or what does this have to do with a page on Politifact “fact checking” on Rick Perry and Tort Reform?

  • edintexas

    I just found the “Huntsman” post. I don’t know how your comment was posted here, but at least I know where it should have been.

  • mirac777

    Tort reform was implemented in 2003. The chart shows politi-fact to be Perry bashing, LIberal spinners of the truth period. Yes lots has changed- for the better in Texas. Perry will be the next President.

    Thanks for putting up the actual facts Erick.

  • mirac777

    Nonsensical comments while trying to look smart here. You have to be pretty slimy or ignorant to not want to see an increase in Doctors in Texas based on the implementation of tort reform that will cut down on filthy get rich quick lawsuits by lawyers.

    Lawsuits are now capped and Doctors are better protected against them in Texas. And you want to somehow say this will not encourage more Doctors to set up shop in Texas? Get real. Better yet, head on over to Media Matters with that rhetoric where it belongs.

    I will address one of your so-called revelations: that perry was false about the number of doctors that could even plausibly be ascribed to tort reform: of the 21,000 perry cites, fewer than 13,000 actually practice in texas; THAT statement is pure spin, period.You have No factual explanation for that Liberal talking point- NONE.FYI- Perry is a name , capitalise it.

  • mirac777

    between one set of numbers including 2011 and one not including the most recent, COMPLETE stats. Simple mistake, except that some folks ( like Liberal spinsters) always use the set of numbers that make their case instead of actually using up to date numbers. Then to top it off they use false baselines plucking stats out a timeline while ignoring the complete picture.

    Liberals fall for this B/S often. RedStaters? Not so much, as proven here quite often.

  • mirac777

    and lazy Liberals can’t survive without the nasty theft disguised as lawsuits to “protect the people.” This is why the majority of these parasites vote Liberal and donate heavily to them. This move was a trend-setter by Gov Perry, and it will ensure Texas stays RED for decades to come. I,d love to see the true numbers of Liberal lawyers fleeing Texas after tort reform. Anything that runs Liberals out of a town/state is good stuff, period. The bonus is that it takes election money right out of Liberals greedy hands.

  • vandalii

    Obamacare is killing small family practices already!

    Our family physician, an African-American doctor that purchased our previous physician’s office, saw the writing on the wall with Obamacare and went to the “dark side”, choosing to become a director within this new morass of redtape. We spoke with she and her husband (part-time office mgr for his wife, part-time CPA for other clients) about why she’d close the office.

    She said she originally left the big-business medical office for a private practice to spend time with her patients. Initially, it was going well, she listened to us, she wasn’t rushing folks out of the office (next, next, next) like she had to in the corporate environment. She had to make a few adjustments (will no longer provide prescriptions for narcotics, etc.) but all-in-all, was doing fine.

    Then Obamacare was signed. Per her, the net was that unless she re-joined the umbrella of a big medical company, she would drown in red-tape including pursuit of underpayment for services plus overall reduced payment for medicaid/medicare. When she and her CPA husband looked over the numbers, they couldn’t make it in a private practice setting and she was unwilling to return to “cattle-call” style medicine as practiced by many large medical companies.

    Obamacare is killing doctors’ practices (even African-American doctors). That variable isn’t being measured by anyone yet, let alone factored into PolitiFiction’s “study”.

  • vandalii

    …she got a letter from the gov’t telling her to prepare to be absorbed by corporate medicine or financially die essentially. It was worded “nicer”, but that was the net of it. So the gov’t is *very* aware of Obamacare’s impact on the small business/private family practice. Nice, huh?

  • williamjameson

    Not sure whether this meets the “Pants on Fire” or the “Full Tilt” meter designation but they should certainly publish themselves as liars. If not the St. Petersburg Times deserves to lose business just as every other liberal company that conspires against the people and chooses lies over truth.