In a way Waxman could be right: The constituents of NY-9 may want to protect their wealth, in a way that a mugging victim wants to protect his. Waxman phrases it as if it’s a bad thing, with a Marxist-socialist overtone, i.e., they’re being selfish and don’t want to “pay their fair share.”

Don’t you find it funny, though, that Democrats have all these pet “victim” groups … until, that is, they abandon the Democrat plantation. The Democrats have been perfectly content acting as protectors of American Jews from all the bogeymen of the Republicans. Then, as soon as Jews vote against them, they’re smeared and accused of being stereotypical selfish money grabbers.

That’s the same way they treat blacks: They’re little helpless pets who and the Democrats believe they’re the only ones protecting the welfare of blacks from those raaaaacist Republicans who want them “hanging from a tree.” Then when a black person wises up and leaves the Democrat plantation, they’re smeared as stupid Uncle Toms and house slaves.

I’ve also them do that to seniors: One minute they’re poor helpless victims of eeeevil Republicans who want to steal their Medicare and Social Security and who want to push them over the cliff. Then, as soon as you see Tea Parties filled with seasoned Americans who don’t want to see their children’s and grandchildren’s lives ruined, the Democrats smear them as selfish, crotchety, angry old people.

This is all done for political gain (= votes) of course. It is quite clear that Democrats don’t give a cr@p about Jews, blacks, or senior citizens. All they care about is their vote.

http://VocalMinority.typepad.com
The Jewish Republican’s Web Sanctuary