…you can conclude the message has permeated the Lefties.

That is what is now occurring on “Morning Joe” [although not during the evening shows, which haven't yet even discovered Solyndra]. Scarborough has gotten Ratner to admit this scheme is “progressive,” and the “fair share” phrase was subject to ridicule. Rattner’s defense [noting that BHO only targets the $25K-threshold]. He was also forced to admit that the proposal is a campaign bumper-sticker, recognizing that nothing was to be implemented until 2013. His defense is that these issues must be addressed, and Mika [predictably] supported him blindly, but he wasn’t nailed-down [so far, but it's only 6:16] on spending [entitlements, burgeoning during past two years, etc.].

Rattner even admitted “you can call it ‘class warfare’ if you want.” Scarborough tried to point-out that “fairness” is less important than jobs-creation, but to no avail…even when he claimed BHO is trying to control the limits of personal income. Rattner then claimed that this plan is intended to reverse the trends during the past decade that favored the wealthy [which wasn't rebutted, because he posed his claims rhetorically]. He concluded that, “in fairness to the President,” he decided to discuss what even Barnicle had recognized as necessary, namely, whether he is obsessed with “punishing the rich.” His endpoint was the customary “Washington is broken” instead of attempting to apportion responsibility as to how it should be fixed.

I have concluded that BHO and his supporters are beginning to exhibit psychotic behavior, referencing the “four A’s of Bleuler.”

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Bleuler

The characteristics are: ambivalence, associative disturbance, If I’m correct, then this departure from dealing with reality offers us an opportunity to adopt a “therapeutic” posture that both advances the cause of enlightenment and clarifies the 2012-issues.

If the CBS-polling is accurate [per Dick Morris], BHO’s personal support [eating into his core] is finally eroding, so what needs to be the focus is being prepared to pounce as truth-tellers while referencing core-values. Thus, @ the end, an opportunity to nail-down Rattner was ignored [after he admitted spending had to be cut...but recognizing this would "cost jobs"]; Joe was too-polite [aided by Mika, who diverted to discussing the guest-list] when he didn’t follow-up [government jobs cost too much, per the stimulus, etc.].

The point, here, is to send a message that is applicable THIS YEAR among local races, that “Democrats cannot be trusted with money” at ALL governmental levels. Just like Maddow had to admit that the 2010-tsunami had affected state-level government dramatically, we need not target NEXT year…when we can start motivating people THIS YEAR.

This approach need not overtly invoke characteristics of the TEA Party Movement, and it need not be tethered to support for Perry [which can be deferred until the wintertime, if choices must be made pubicly]. Self-proclaimed “Independents” must be confronted aggressively with the lack of reality-testing that Politically-Schizophrenic ideologues necessarily exhibit. If slick-guys such as Rattner can be undermined–even after he hides behind his selective database–then conversations with people who harbor a self-image of open-mindedness can refer to The Forgotten Taxpayer as a pivot-point [without getting into the Austrian School].

I’ll close with reference to how the 6:25 a.m. Politico-commentary was processed. BHO was said to be manifesting the polling-popularity of soaking the rich [the character of which wasn't properly parsed], but it is admitted by those in the White House that this won’t create jobs [while rallying the base]. Even some of the “small wins” [$ for vets, etc.] intended to be bipartisan are a shroud for trying to frame the politics of GOP-rejection, praising the prescience of Clinton during the Sunday talk-show blitz. But, even if they “run against Congress,” they will lose the POTUS position; all we need to do immediately is to note that BHO would prefer to campaign than to govern effectively.

Craigbardo is noting that the GOP must guard against a visceral decision that could transpire en-masse next year; will the recipients of Obama-Money decide to re-elect their pseudo-breadwinner…when they constitute half of the electorate?