« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Does Barack Obama Think America Needs Viagra? His “Malaise’ Moment Arrives

From "The Audacity of Hope" to Hopeless Audacity

It’s not Barack Obama’s policies. It is not the economic uncertainty over regulations and taxes. It is not the National Labor Relations Board and Department of Labor pushing aggressively pro-union agendas that hamper competition.

No, according to Barack Obama, our nation has grown soft. That’s our problem. Jimmy Carter said America was in a “malaise.” This is Barack Obama’s “malaise” moment.

It can’t be about him. It cannot be about his polices. On the same day Joe Biden declares the economy belongs to Barack Obama, Obama passes the buck. This time it is directly to the American people and American businesses.

It’s not him, you see. It’s us.

“This is a great great country that had gotten a little soft and we didn’t have that same competitive edge that we needed over the last couple of decades,” Mr. Obama said in response to a question about the country’s economic future. “We need to get back on track.”

We don’t have the competitive edge we once had because we have a President who spent two years deciding the government would grow the economy and the government would take over the auto industry and the government would take over the healthcare industry and the government would pick the winners and losers in the economy.

The American people and American business has not gone soft. They’ve gone out of business.

Barack Obama’s administration has been hostile to the financial industry, hostile to the oil and gas industry, hostile to the coal industry, hostile to the insurance industry, hostile to the service industry, hostile to pretty much every other sector of the economy that is neither part of the public sector nor wholly dependent on the public sector.

Consider Barack Obama’s regular speeches on the state of the economy.

Here is an excerpt from his speech on February 24, 2009, about his stimulus plan:

More than 90% of these jobs will be in the private sector – jobs rebuilding our roads and bridges; constructing wind turbines and solar panels; laying broadband and expanding mass transit.

Each of those “private sector” jobs would be wholly dependent on government money. The infrastructure jobs would be paid for by government infrastructure spending. The clean energy jobs would be paid for with government subsidies to companies like Solyndra. The laying broadband and mass transit would likewise be private sector jobs doing the bidding of government.

Consider his January 27, 2010, State of the Union address:

More than 90% of these jobs will be in the private sector – jobs rebuilding our roads and bridges; constructing wind turbines and solar panels; laying broadband and expanding mass transit.

All of these are government jobs or jobs wholly dependent on government for funding.

Consider his January 25, 2011, State of the Union:

We will put more Americans to work repairing crumbling roads and bridges. We will make sure this is fully paid for, attract private investment, and pick projects based on what’s best for the economy

Again, government dependent jobs.

Then there was the President’s “jobs” speech on September 8, 2011:

The purpose of the American Jobs Act is simple: to put more people back to work and more money in the pockets of those who are working. It will create more jobs for construction workers, more jobs for teachers, more jobs for veterans, and more jobs for long-term unemployed.

All of these jobs the President had in mind were jobs either within the public sector or wholly dependent on the public sector. They were not true private sector jobs where the entrepreneurs of the private sector went out and took a risk to get the reward of profit filling a need for the American consumer or business. Barack Obama has worked very hard to take risk out of the free market and, in fact, to punish risk takers who are successful. He has made entrepreneurs the villains. He’s made job creators the bad guys. He’s made the successful sinners and the Solyndras of the world the saints.

And what is the net result of all these speeches and policy proposals? As Mark Levin points out, the Democrats themselves in the Senate do not have the votes to pass the President’s jobs bill. The Senate Democrats reject President Obama’s plan.

Again, the American people have not gone soft. They’ve gone out of business thanks to Barack Obama and his failed economic policies. Even the Senate Democrats are starting to pay attention to a President who has gone from audacious hope to hopeless audacity.

COMMENTS

  • Raven

    pick winners and loser in the economy, that is. His “Winners” have continuously turned out to be losers.

  • romeg

    ?This is a great great country that had gotten a little soft and we didn?t have that same competitive edge that we needed over the last couple of decades,? Mr. Obama said in response to a question about the country?s economic future. ?We need to get back on track.?

    Yes, Indeed, America has gotten soft… in the head for electing to the most important elective office in this country and, arguably, the most important elective office in the universe, a complete cipher, an utter incompetent so that those who voted for him can feel good about THEMSELVES for having the “courage” to vote for “a person of Color” when they knew or should have known that he was utterly unqualified for the job he was seeking and to which they were electing him.

    If that is not merely a measure but proof positive of that soft headed nitwittery then no such indicator even exists. When Americans choose to sacrifice the economic future to their self-indulgent need to feel good about themselves based on a combination of the rantings of a handful of race-baiting buffoons such as “The Reverend” Al Sharpton and “The Reverend” Jessee Jackson and the well-rehearsed and carefully scripted utterances of a man whose total accomplishments amount to nothing that can be measured in economic or social terms beyond the sales of two self-indulgent books whose sales success was based solely on the author’s celebrity, then America has not only gone soft, it has utterly surrendered to the pop culture that pervades it.

    To paraphrase that Oldsmobile catch phrase “This isn’t your
    father’s America.”

    We do, indeed, need to get back on track. We begin to do that by rejecting the class warfare, race-baiting, guilt-ridden feel goodism and FIRE that moron on the basis that he has failed, is utterly unqualified for the office he holds, and that his policies, based on “theories” that have been totally disproven over the last 100 years and get back to the basics that made this nation the greatest nation in all of human history.

  • suzyq

    when I saw the video on another site. I laughed out loud and said “Honey come here and listen to this, Obama just had his malaise moment!”

    I originally thought that moment might have been at the CBC the other weekend, but I guess he was just getting warmed up.

    Total Facepalm.

  • charliesalmanack

    By “decades”, when does the President mark the turning point? The 1960′s? 1970″s? Just when, Mr. President, did Americans go soft.

    If this has been a problem for years, Mr. President, why are you only telling us this now?

    Finally Mr. President, how would you rank the issue of Americans “softness” relative to other issues you’ve blamed for our lackluster economic growth: ATM machines, airport kiosks, Europe, tsunami’s, Bush. Is the “softness” of the American people near the top, middle, or bottom of the list of reasons that our economic growth is so meager these days?

  • http://rantburger.blogspot.com/ rantburger

    This is all part of the grand 2012 strategy. Obama 2012: This is not here. http://rantburger.blogspot.com/2011/08/obama-2012-strategy-this-is-not-here.html

  • lakeshore

    Just WHO is he saying is “soft”? The entire country, or some part of it? Which group? If a conservative leader said this, the media would be all over him for sounding elitist and out of touch. It would be perceived as anti labor, anti common man. So…is Obama targeting businesses, unions, educators…or perhaps the scientists and engineers? After all, he has so much experience in all of these fields of expertise. Tell us more, professor.

  • renl57

    Want to know how America got “soft”? When men like Obama took its unequivocal, hard-edged success stories–and did their best to “soften” them up.

    Boeing is a true American success story, selling its airliners worldwide. So the Obama Administration said, “Let’s stop them from expanding their Dreamliner production line because the unions don’t like where they put it.”

    Google is a true American success story; starting from nothing but a few algorithms from a couple of computer scientists, today people all over the world in 180 countries routinely do Google searches. So the Obama Administration said, “Let’s hit them with an antitrust lawsuit. Heck, we can even use Google searches to help compile our antitrust lawsuit briefs!”

    And many of Obama’s hard-left supporters are working hard every day in the media and on the Internet to convince Americans that America’s decline is inevitable; we can either manage it “gracefully” or just go down in flames entirely.

    I can certainly understand why Americans would look at the troubles America’s gotten into, and conclude that America is in decline. What I can’t accept is how many Americans have no problem with that.

  • gritsandall

    is just another way of covering up the problem that has been creeping up on America for decades. Hardworking citizens have been too busy working to try to take care of their families to realize what the left has been doing to this country. Liberal politicians, media and enviromental eggheads have tied the hands of business and hobbled their feet with regulations and union thugs and now they blame workers and business for not being able to produce under these adverse circumstances. People are waking up to the leaches who have been draining us of our life blood. Maybe it is not too late to turnthings around.

  • cacharlie

    Well done, romeg, and now tell me, what do you think of Cain?

  • cacharlie

    proves what? Good for what our government is actually in charge of, or that BO is not soft? Hopefully, voters keep that matter straight as we get to know who is the best President we can elect in 2012. So far, I see that as Herman Cain. Hopefully, he is as good as he appears – a no nonsense, upbeat, effective leader.

  • carolina

    I’m still waiting for the 23 senate libs up for reelection to rebel. I guess they want to go down with the progressive loser ship.

  • Common_Cents

    well, according to him.

    The pampered spoiled rock star showed up, gave a couple speeches and everyone just isn’t falling all over themselves to do what he says? That is what he has done his whole life.

    Lazy, soft America! Just like a washed up milli vanilli phoney act wondering why the fans tuned out.

    Our own “Milli-Vanilli President”, Barack Hussein Obama.

  • 4deuce

    Why does Obama use every and all excuses for his failures? Why is the problem a tsunami, Arab Spring, bad European financial situations, global warming, the Cubs in a losing streak or due to a bad hair day for Michelle? Why is it always an outside influence to be blamed and not Obama himself?

    I started having these same nagging questions come to visit me starting at that surreal moment when Obama returned a bust of Winston Churchill that had been a White House fixture for decades… Why did he do THAT I wondered…

    The answer to the Churchill bust issue hit me yesterday when I came across some quoted of Sir Winston himself. Two most noteworthy Churchill quotes pretty much answer both of these questions above : Why Obama blames everything on someone/something else AND why the Churchill bust was sent back to the UK

    Churchill said: “The price of greatness is responsibility.”
    Were Obama to BE responsible, he would have no option but to accept his reponsibilty for failures of his won making. And by now most of us know that in all things, Obama’s ego and conviction of his own messiah-like qualities override all else, especially the facts.

    Churchill also said: “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” This, in a nutshell is the WHY of Churchill’s bust was deported back to Britain. Obama views Churchill as a pure enemy of his movment to socialize the USA and along with’s Churchill’s acceptance of reposnisbility during Britain’s most trying years, such a man must be made rid of from an Obama White House

  • 4deuce

    Why does Obama use every and all excuses for his failures? Why is the problem a tsunami, Arab Spring, bad European financial situations, global warming, the Cubs in a losing streak or due to a bad hair day for Michelle? Why is it always an outside influence to be blamed and not Obama himself?

    I started having these same nagging questions come to visit me starting at that surreal moment when Obama returned a bust of Winston Churchill that had been a White House fixture for decades… Why did he do THAT I wondered…

    The answer to the Churchill bust issue hit me yesterday when I came across some quoted of Sir Winston himself. Two most noteworthy Churchill quotes pretty much answer both of these questions above : Why Obama blames everything on someone/something else AND why the Churchill bust was sent back to the UK

    Churchill said: “The price of greatness is responsibility.”
    Were Obama to BE responsible, he would have no option but to accept his reponsibilty for failures of his won making. And by now most of us know that in all things, Obama’s ego and conviction of his own messiah-like qualities override all else, especially the facts.

    Churchill also said: “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” This, in a nutshell is the WHY of Churchill’s bust was deported back to Britain. Obama views Churchill as a pure enemy of his movment to socialize the USA and along with’s Churchill’s acceptance of reposnisbility during Britain’s most trying years, such a man must be made rid of from an Obama White House

  • vandalii

    …what Prez. Obama has in common with the rank-and-file Americans, be they white, black, brown, purple, green, etc. This is a man that was born (somewhere, have to trust him on that one) and raised outside the USA for some period of time, then raised by a wealthy grandmother, managed to go to all the right schools (at least that’s the claim — we can’t get at his grades so we’ll have to take his word for that, too), so all his associations up to and including his community organizing have been with a different breed of folks than the “Joe Plumbers” out there.

    He was *not* raised in the average African-American neighborhood or in that culture, did not experrence that part of Americana until much later in his life (when he needed the votes). So his actual experience with “work” has been amongst the elites in this world — professors, lawyers, congress-critters, others of a relatively high work ethic (or at least a drive for power, prestige or success as measured by that industry).

    Is it possible he really doesn’t *know* anyone on the dole? That their defeatest poverty mentality isn’t just a matter of “buck up and get out there” but is generations in the making, completely decoupling the idea of work and money such that the one doesn’t relate to the other?

    Trust me, I’m no fan of our Community-Organizer in Chief. But I wonder if his LaLa view of life might actually be that everyone prefers to work to become successful rather than sit around (love his “fuzzy slippers” comment) or worse, become “successful” in the black market, loan-sharking, drug distribution, illegal gun sales or other anti-social endevor.

    I suspect that “benefit of the doubt” is incorrect, but what if, like so many bleeding-heart liberals, he actually believes everyone will do what’s right if they get the chance? That’s a world-view issue, and his is way out of this world.
    He may truly be mystified by

  • vietnamvet1971

    I see our country as a True American sure we have problems and things need fixed But we sure do NOT need another 4more years of Do Nothing Obama. He acts like he is looking at our country from the outside which he is. Him and his liberal sissy/whimpy bunch are pathetic girly boys that wished they could be a Man some day.

  • vandalii

    …meant to finish with:

    He may truly be mystified by the idea that people *aren’t* always going to do what they should even when it is handed to them on a silver platter (like he did).

  • BA Cyclone

    Caudillo Obama, and many of his legions have not yet admitted that Obama does not have such powers, at least in political realms.

  • BA Cyclone

    Caudillo Obama, and many of his legions have not yet admitted that Obama does not have such powers, at least in political realms.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    so for him to use that construct is grotesque. I think we are witnessing the prelude to a landslide Democrat loss of major proportions.

  • funwithknives

    and danged if you didn’t beat me to it. Barry, under stress is finally showing *The True Progressive Man* underneath. Not very pretty and telling in the extreme.
    Just like Billy-Bob,The Skinny Girl and The Dress of recent past, it will not be too long before you can actually find many who will admit voting for this doofus.
    “Jest Keep Talkin’, Barry,…Jest Keep Talkin..” Is Biden tutoring him?

  • funwithknives

    the English Language,as we know it is going to get a torturous workout. I keep coming back to a vision of RATS escaping from the sinking ship you mention, and nowhere to go.
    Iffin’ they do not step up pretty quick, look for 23 new Liberal-cause lobbyists or Progressive think-tank employees in 1/2013. Look at Jane Harman, she got out when it was smart.

  • romeg

    Shortly thereafter, Herman ran for the U.S. Senate. He came to one of our county party meetings and spoke about his candidacy, his reasons for running and a bit about his background. Afterward I spent about 20 minutes with him. My first question was whether he preferred to be referred to as African American or Black or just what.

    He said “I am an American. PERIOD!” From that moment I was hooked on Herman. He is one of the warmest, most personable men I’ve ever met. The Herman Cain you see on stage in the debates is the Herman Cain you meet on the street: devoid of affectations, approachable and genuinely likeable.

    The one surprise for me in his candidacy is his 9/9/9 plan. I understand what he is after but I was a little surprised by his announcement of the plan due to his previous very strong support of The Fair Tax.

    I think he would make a great President and I’m a big fan and supporter, at least to the limit of my means. I’m a little disappointed at his, IMHO, premature endorsement of Mitt Romney. It sort of hints that he’s running for VP instead of President.

    It will be interesting to watch how the other candidates react to his recent spike in the polls.

  • ysonyou

    He thinks we need a more robust (bureaucratic collectivist state) economy, or at least the preconditions for one.

  • hoootie

    Does anyone remember the bust of Sir Winston Churchill that was given to us by the British government. Please let me tell you where it is now. When OHOMO moved into OUR white house he found the bust unacceptable. So he had it shipped back the the Crown. What replaced it is beyond MY belief. There was a national publication, I don’ t remember which, had taken a photo of him walking and super-imposed it on water to appear like he was walking on water. That now sits in the honorable place of the Churchill bust. Two things come to mind. First, that was a slap to Jesus face. OHOMO equated huimself to Jesus deity to be able to perform miracles and walk on water. Secondly, he insulted the British Crown as the bust was a gift during the Bush administration to America. One more thing he did to the Brits. He gave Russia information critical to the secrecy of Britain’s nuclear arsenal. In conclusion….I LOVE MY COUNTRY….BUT I HATE THIS GOVERNMENT. I PROUDLY CONSIDER MYSELF A CONSERVATIVE PATRIOT AS I AM CERTAIN MOST OF YOU ARE AS WELL. We can undo a lot of the of the damage this bunch of rag tag fools have created, That’s not the true essence of the problem. There still remains about 50% of the country that are totally brain dead and would vote for this charlatan again. What in heavens name can we do about this 50% scourge on our society who have the ability to vote informed or not ?????

  • http://ja-js.blogtownhall.com RME KRNL

    “Even the Senate Democrats are starting to pay attention to a President who has gone from audacious hope to hopeless audacity.”

    Excellent turn of phrase, and accurate, too!