« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Regaining Control When Your Congressman is Out of Control

Editor’s Note: Starting last week and each week from here on, I’ve decided to focus on a Republican in the House or Senate the Tea Party should consider primarying. I think we are too distracted by Presidential politics and cannot afford to keep on keeping on in the House and Senate.

Last week I started with Martha Roby. This week, another one. Each week, based on finding pitiful scores in the Heritage Action for America rankings and considering the districts at stake, I’ll highlight a new one. This should be fun.

————————————————–

He was elected in 2002. He is serving his fifth term in Congress.

In 2003, his first year in Congress, he voted for a massive omnibus spending bill and the Medicare prescription drug benefit.

In 2004, he voted for an energy bill bloated with subsidies (ethanol, clean coal, loan guarantees, etc.), and he voted against long-needed conservative reforms to the federal budget process, but ones opposed by the appropriators.

In 2005, he voted for a highway bill loaded with earmarks and billions more than the Highway Trust Fund had collected in gas taxes. He voted to keep funding for the National Endowment for the Arts, and to postpone savings from realigning defense bases. He voted against at least seven across-the-board amendments to cut just 1% from various of the annual spending bills. He voted to increase funding for Big Bird and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. And he voted to keep Fannie and Freddie’s line to the U.S. Treasury wide open.

In 2006, he never seems to have found an earmark he didn’t like, including: the Leonard Wood Research Institute, the Bronx Council for the Arts, the Kentucky tourism industry, and a city-owned pool in California. Oh, and he voted for campaign finance restrictions.

When Democrats took control, his votes got worse.

In 2007, he voted to increase the minimum wage and for card check. He voted to maintain ten of the most underperforming Amtrak routes. He again voted to keep the flood gates of pork open: lobster and shellfish research, local parking lots, county courthouses, economic development conveniently located near the home of former Appropriations Chairman Jerry Lewis, and…the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service (the infamous earmark authored by Congressman Rangel that was used as seed money to solicit private donations in his honor). He voted to expand and reauthorize the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), and to override one of President Bush’s few vetoes to control spending.

In 2008, he voted to block new regulations from the Bush Administration designed to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicaid. He voted to expand federal student loan subsidies and against capping farm subsidies. He again voted to reauthorize Amtrak and to bailout the federal highway program. He voted for a $300 billion bailout of Fannie and Freddie and to suspend a warning trigger designed to keep Medicare from going broke.

In 2009, he voted to reauthorize Bill Clinton’s Americorps program and to provide cash for clunkers. He voted to subsidize research on gas turbines and extend unemployment benefits (unpaid for, of course) and small business subsidies. He voted for new solar technology programs.

In 2010, he voted to bribe senior citizens with $250 payments and to again preserve Amtrak. He voted to bail out state governments and provide subsidies to the manufacturing sector.

This year, in this new era of fiscal responsibility, he has voted to block funding for federal employee pay increases and against returning spending to the already high level when Democrats took control. He voted against the RSC’s balanced budget. He has again voted to preserve funding for the NEA and energy efficiency programs. And of course, he voted for both versions of the final trillion dollar debt limit increase and the recent continuing resolution that violated the Republicans’ own budget.

His current Heritage Action for America score is 58%.

His district voted for George W. Bush and John McCain for president, and Tom Corbett recently for governor. It is +6 GOP district. It is not a marginal Northeast district.

Think he might be just a reasonable moderate but a good and honorable elected official? He was accused of using taxpayer resources for campaign purposes by a member of his own staff, fired the staffer, and then got huffy in public when confronted by the media.

His name is Tim Murphy, and he needs to be primaried.

PS: This is an ongoing series at Redstate about pathetic Congressmen who need to be primaried. Solid diary entries that provide updated local reporting of these potential primary fights will likely find themselves promoted to the front page.

COMMENTS

  • bigredone

    I await your take on my spineless Member, Brett Guthrie (S-KY).
    1) Cash for Clunkers–YES
    2) Debt Ceiling Increase–YES

    That’s just two. He is awful, and he must be primaried. We are working on it!

  • Jim Tomasik

    Could you link directly to the Heritage Action for America page for each congressman? It might get people to become more familiar with that very useful tool and prompt them to look at their own elected senators and congressman.

  • paulplantowin

    Get him on record too. He reminds me – the whole story isn’t in the voting record tho that’s good info. If they get honored positions, key committees, etc, there is much to learn from what they don’t do.
    It may be outside your goals for this project, but the key issue for me is figuring out if they are true Constitutional conservatives or not.
    Thanks for the effort – I’ve also been concerned that this Presidential election will get too much attention.

  • red_oakster

    I nominate Steve Latourette from Ohio as someone worthy of a challenge

  • http://online.logcabin.org/about/ suzieQ

    Jason Chaffetz. He is a former democrat who worked on the Jon Hunstman Jr. campaign in 2004. He has always supported a policy of cut and run in Iraq and Afghanistan. Chaffetz makes Hunstman look like a principled conservative.

  • http://conservativemountaineer.blogspot.com/ conservativemountaineer

    Western PA that will have enough $$ and time/resources to do this on his/her own. The powers-to-be are all squishy Republicans and will most likely do nothing to oust one of their own.

    Tim Murphy is my Congressman. I’ve met him through my membership in the local Republican committee. IMHO, he’s a genuinely likable guy. And, probably hard to beat unless one has big $$. Not saying it can’t be done, it will be difficult. The District is one of those ‘snake-like’ districts that runs from just SW of Pittsburgh , out through the Mon Valley and some way beyond.

    BTW, wasn’t this Santorum’s seat prior to the Senate? I seem to recall Santorum won the District by doing a *lot* of door-to-door.

  • Darin_H

    Pittsburgh suburbs?

    I’d like to see my congressman up there too, John Mica (FL-07), he’s a big time porker.

  • http://conservativemountaineer.blogspot.com/ conservativemountaineer

    I would support Murphy over a more Conservative candidate. In fact, I would take a good hard look at any challenger. I will, however, support him in any General Election.

    One thing I should do, especially since I’ve become invloved and Murphy is my Representative, is start posing questions to him concerning some of his past stances, etc. I did express my displeasure to him (through his District office) concerning some of his votes. Card-check definitely was one of those.

  • gawken

    Lots of folks here in FL unhappy with Mica because of the High Speed Rail boondoggle…any possible challengers surfaced yet?

  • buzzyboop

    …I don’t think you could describe Evan Feinberg as anything but wet behind the ears.

    http://www.politicspa.com/tim-murphy-gets-a-challenger/28236/

    The last true conservative in PA-18 was Rick Santorum, so that’s not saying much.

  • wennejunk

    Pull ‘em off the fringe of the herd. The rest will run harder.

    Strengthens the whole herd and you don’t have to eliminate the smart ones in order to get a change of direction from the leadership.

  • amigag

    and will be a great service. We certainly need to clean out those that vote against our best interests. I’ve read other forums/blogs that are expressing the importance of electing Conservatives to the House & Senate.

    Directing them to Redstate will be great. I get the impression that many want to do this, but perhaps don’t have the know how to get the info.

    This will be so helpful!!!! Thanks Erick.

  • http://conservativemountaineer.blogspot.com/ conservativemountaineer

    the North Hills, there may be a better chance of attracking a Conservative to run against Murphy. It’s *not* going to happen in or with the current PA-18 electorate. The North Hills area is much more affluemt than most of PA-18 and much more Red than PA-18.

    Remember, Melissa Hart was from North Hills area [as is Jane Orie, PA Senate R; but she's toast now due to a political vendetta by Allegheny County DA - Stephen Zappala (D) - who, IMHO has a whole host of problems involving him, his Brother and his Father; they have so much political juice they'll never be "caught".]

  • sharp

    What about a national campaign? “Replace 80 RINOs and we guarantee to replace Boehner, Canter, et al.”

    Get Steve King & Ted Poe & Joe Walsh to declare a new leadership team – that will set the conservative agenda in the next congress.

    What good does it do to replace the lowest ranked Republicans, if we keep the same “Leader”??

  • bobguzzardi

    I spoke with Evan Feinberg this morning and I know a number of people who have met him. He worked with Heritage as a researcher on School Choice issues and was a staffer for Sen. Tom Coburn and then Sen. Rand Paul.

    The district voted 65% for Pat Toomey and is a plus 6 or plus 8, that is, tends ‘conservative’.

    Evan Feinberg tells me that he will be able to tap into national money to challenge Tim Murphy. He has filed his FEC papers and will be opening a bank account tomorrow.

    This is race that can be won.

  • bobguzzardi

    This district went for Pat Toomey 65% and voted for Tom Corbett for Governor. It is not a liberal district.

  • tampaconservative

    Yeah, I know….who is Gus Bilirakis, that’s what a lot of us want to know. He has never led on anything and is only a couple percentage points ahead of Murphy at 62% approval rating in the Heritage rankings….this when he comes from a solidly conservative district that he won with 72% of the vote in 2010.

    If we cannot have a true leader represent us from the Tampa area….can we at least have a solid conservative from this district? Time for Gus to find other employment.

  • bobguzzardi

    Jane Orie is toast because of her own behavior. the Penna Senate was never investigated for Bonusgate violations or other legal infractions like the state House Rs and Ds.

  • caliray

    The website for Get Out Of Our House, a group dedicated to finding good, conservative candidates for the House of Representatives can be found at GOOOH dot com

  • http://www.voteforteri2010.com teridavisnewman

    Shimkus is a total RINO and needs to go. Jason Plummer could beat him in the primary without breaking a sweat. My opponent in the last election, Jerry Costello, announced yesterday that he won’t be seeking re-election. I’m pretty sure he didn’t want to face me again with the insider trading accusations I have leveled (and can prove) in 2012. I am in a primary race for the nomination again, but I won it last time and I am confident I will win it this time too,
    Check Shimkus’ record. He’s a liberal Republican all the way.

  • bigboy46

    Don’t forget Shelley Berkeley. A disgrace, also an ethics complaint

  • ice2

    I love the ideas here. An additional push is to have each Congressman speak his/her Oaths in public on tape, and hold them to the Constitution Of The United States Of America. With applicable punishments if broken. Such as for Treason, Sedition, High Crimes & Misdemeanors. It already has teeth just enforce them.
    Here are a few legal definitions on the subject.

    Malfeasance the performance by a public official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing (used especially of an act in violation of a public trust).
    Nonfeasance is to ignore and take no indicated action – neglect. Misfeasance is to take inappropriate action or give intentionally incorrect advice. Malfeasance is hostile, aggressive action taken to injure the client’s interests.
    Example: A company hires a catering company to provide drinks and food for a retirement party. If the catering company doesn’t show up, it’s considered nonfeasance. If the catering company shows up but only provides drinks (and not the food, which was also paid for), it’s considered misfeasance. If the catering company accepts a bribe from its client’s competitor to undercook the meat, thereby giving those present food poisoning, it’s considered malfeasance

    High crimes and misdemeanors is a phrase from Section 4 of Article Two of the United States Constitution: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
    “High” in the legal parlance of the 18th century means “against the State”. A high crime is one which seeks the overthrow of the country, which gives aid or comfort to its enemies, or which injures the country to the profit of an individual or group. In democracies and similar societies it also includes crimes which attempt to alter the outcome of elections.
    An alien who is present in a country (which is foreign to him/her) unlawfully or without the country’s authorization is known as an illegal alien of that country.[2] An illegal alien commonly refers to a foreign national who resides in another country unlawfully, either by entering that country at a place other than a designated port-of-entry or as result of the expiration of a non-immigrant visa. An enemy alien is an alien who is a national of an enemy country
    Just google for more.

  • marke

    If it wasn’t for the date he was elected you could almost substitute Kentucky’s king of pork, Hal Rogers, in your post.

  • ihateliberals

    many RINO’s are just Republican Liberals. they run on the GOP ticket because they can’t make it on the Democratic or other party tickets. We over theyers have voted for them because they were republicans and us older folks knew that meant Conservative. In reality it didn’t’ mean that at all. since Reagn left office we haven’t had a rel conservtive in office in many places includng the White House. Both Bushes were RINO’s and didn’t do much for the party. GHW Bush was the biggest mistake tht Reagan made while in office. he needed Bush in his first term to get elected. His second term is where he should have been dumped. Reagan could have won with me as his VP. That problem was tht whoever was Reagan’s VP was going to be the next president. Now the GOP is about to make another BIG blunder with either Romney or Perry as the Nominee. RINO’s and we are just following them blindly because we hate Obama so much. It doesn’t do us any good to jump from the frying pan into the fire.

  • bobguzzardi

    Evan Feinberg ?primarying? SpecterRepublican Rep. (Tim Murphy Pa-18). Tim Murphy says he represents his district but his district voted for Pat Toomey 2010 65-35. Campaign website is here.

    http://evanfeinberg.com/

    ?Born and raised in the South Hills of Pittsburgh, Evan went to college at nearby Grove City College and fought for limited government and traditional values while working as a senior aide for both Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and with the Heritage Foundation.?

    ?Evan is married to Sarah Feinberg, an officer in the Marine Corps Reserves and Iraq War veteran. In May, the couple welcomed their first child, Luke Fidelis Feinberg.?

  • kenchely

    Replace the less conservative Republicans in the House and you’ll replace John Boehner, all right. You’ll replace him with Nancy Pelosi.

    OK, I get it that there are districts and states where if a moderate Republican incumbent (there are no liberal Republicans any more, with the defeat of Mike Castle) loses the primary, the conservative will hold the seat. The defeat of Bennett in Utah last year was an example; if a conservative beats Lugar in Indiana next year, the GOP will probably hold the seat.

    But there are others where if you defeat that moderate Republican incumbent with a conservative, you lose the seat and instead of getting someone who votes right 50-70% of the time, you get someone who votes right 0% of the time. The two ladies from Maine are an example; they’re not conservatives, but they’re a lot more conservative than anyone else likely to be senators from Maine. Remember Ed Muskie? George Mitchell? Bill Hathaway? If you don’t get a moderate Republican in Maine, you get at best a main-line liberal like Muskie or Mitchell, at worst a whacko leftie like Hathaway. Maine isn’t New Hampshire, where a conservative can win.

    Scott Brown is a moderate conservative who votes right about 70% of the time. Remember Kennedy? See Kerry? That’s what you get if you try to replace Brown with someone. It was very unusual when the Democrat who took Lowell Weicker’s seat (Lieberman) in Connecticut was no more liberal than the Republican he replaced, and Weicker was MUCH more liberal than anyone now sitting in the Senate.

    You replace Martha Roby in a primary, you’ll probably still hold the seat. That was a freakish situation that produced a Democrat in that district and it probably won’t happen again. But what do you suppose happens if you knock off LaTourette in Ohio or Fitzpatrick in Pennsylvania? You know what happens–the Democrats get the seat.

    Someone who votes with you 60% of the time isn’t as good as someone who votes with you 100% of the time–but she’s a whole lot better than someone who votes with you 0% of the time, and she’s more your friend than your enemy.

  • dvo914

    As an executive board member of my county Republican party, we have a bylaw, just as the majority of other county Republican parties have, that states that the county party will not support a Republican challenger to an incumbent Republican. I don’t agree with this bylaw because many incumbents are the RINOs that you are describing and reporting on. I love the idea, but don’t know how you’ll get around these stupid bylaws that prevent us from having the truly conservative representation that we want and deserve.

  • jerseydevil

    Being elected to Congress is regarded as being sent on a looting raid for one’s friends. -George Will

    Spotlight the Rino from NJ-2! LoBiondo has been dozing in that office, w/the best view of the US Captial I have ever seen, since 1995! He has to GO!