« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Nostalgia & Decline

Apple has out a new app in its App Store — Cards. You can take a picture on your phone, design a card, and have it sent via the post office to someone. Think about that for a minute. In an age of digital communications, text messages, emails, and cell phones, Apple has produced a product that harkens back to one of the earliest message transmission methods — snail mail as the kids these days are calling it.

Siri, the assistant on the iPhone, kindles fond memories of growing up in the age of Star Trek for the thirty somethings out there.

A friend of mine two nights ago showed me an awesome app he works on called Goba. It’s available for the iPhone, Android, Windows Mobile, etc. It lets you plan an offline gathering of friends and manage sending texts and emails and the replies thereto. An app for the phone designed to facilitate a gathering of friends off line and unplugged.

My neighborhood is pretty new. Almost every house has a relic of an earlier time — a front porch. My wife, me, and our kids sit on the front porch in rocking chairs or the kids play on the porch. On sites like Etsy, people are getting back to early American crafts — typography, quilts, homemade soaps, arts, etc. Like with Apple’s Cards program, people are trying to reconnect to a past that exists in our dreams. Part is real and part is not real. But we are trying to connect to it.

At this time, as so many perceive a decline in the country, there is a profound sense of nostalgia for a past era. Successful technologies from Apple or this Goba program or others are those technologies that actually help us realize, in some way, some part of that past. From getting a card in the mail to meeting friends on a front porch in the evening for a drink, Americans want to turn back to a simpler time or at least a time that they perceive to be simpler.

This is why the Republicans will lose next November to Barack Obama.

Now, to be clear, the GOP does not have to lose to Barack Obama. They can turn it around. But to beat Barack Obama, the GOP is going to have to offer up something. That something needs to connect with American nostalgia.

The anger on stage at the CNN debate might fire up the base and it might drag it out for Mitt Romney, but voters are ready to return to an era of happy warriors brimming with optimism and a vision of the country that is positive, not premised on American decline. The anger was directed at each other, not at the state of the country.

This is why Herman Cain resonates. This is why 999 and its utter simplicity resonates.

As a society, regardless of party, we’ve made our lives too damn difficult. It is not easy to file your taxes. It is not easy to start a business. The byzantine structure of the tax code, the bureaucracy, the regulations, and so on have complicated our lives needlessly.

People are mad as hell because we’ve gone from a country that rewards hard work to rewarding failure. Those who played by the rules are forced to bail out the people and businesses who didn’t. Kids are growing up expecting reward without either risk or success. To quote Jeremiah Wright, “the chickens are coming home to roost.”

We’ve gone soft as a nation, propping up the nanny state to make life easier and more egalitarian, but in the process we’ve seen some really are more equal than the rest of us and our efforts to make life easier and less risky have created a growing social safety net smothering risk and freedom. We’ve tried to ensure outcome of equality, not creation stage equality.

And people, subconsciously or consciously, are trying to turn back the clock. They want to get back to a time that was less complicated, maybe a little more raw, but filled with the wild west spirit of optimism and hard work that saw each horizon as something to be crossed to a better tomorrow.

Right now, only Herman Cain really expresses that time. Rick Perry says he wants to make Washington as inconsequential in our lives as possible, but where is the hope? Where is the optimism? Where is the warrior for what’s right? Where is the guy who is willing to throw out the money changers?

Herman Cain is running not against Obama, but for a view of the United States that is still the shining city on the hill. I hear him speak and I hear him connecting with that sense of American nostalgia so many are embracing right now — a nostalgia that says, “Yes, yesterday was pretty awesome for America. But you ain’t seen nothing yet.”

I hear Rick Perry talk about that in terms of Texas. I hear Romney talk like a technocrat muttering on about plugging in various variables into arcane economic formulas to churn out various forms of growth and zzzzzzz . . . .

Where is the vision of the shining city on the hill? Where is the vision of the better tomorrow. Where is the rhetoric that transcends red meat? I’m not hearing it and people want to hear it. They don’t want to wait for the general election. They want the happy warriors with their optimism in the fight for freedom now. And let’s not underrate the “warrior” bit. Along with the optimism must come a heavy dose of moral outrage at what is right now going on. The outrage is outrage against those gaming the system, against the politicians making it harder and harder for the entrepreneur against the established business, and against a less than free market where the government picks winners and losers largely based on campaign donations.

These candidates need to sell hope. Not the false hope that Obama sold. Obama sold a hope in himself. He wanted people to put their hopes in him. And now he’s lost them. But the GOP cannot gain them merely by not being Obama. They’ve got to offer more.

In the Bible, Paul writes about hope. That hope is a specific hope. It is Christ. The hope in a supreme God who through his son will deliver those who believe into the promised land, vanquish sin, and save the world.

In America, we have always had our own brand of hope — that of America against the world. That hope that says we are the last best hope for mankind and all those yearning to breath free can come here, work hard, and thrive and the government exists to make sure everyone has a chance to compete.

It is a hope that has real punishment and consequences both for those countries that try to outpace us and for those of our own citizens within and outside government who try to stifle the American entrepreneurial spirit.

Right now, we’re not thriving. We’re rewarding those who are gaming the system, not working hard. We’ve let the government pick winners and losers instead of a free market, which itself is increasingly not free. We’re putting up candidates who make decisions based on how it will look when they run for office, not on whether it is right or wrong. See e.g. Mitt Romney last night on his sanctuary mansion saying, “”I’m running for office, for Pete’s sake, I can’t have illegals.”

The Republican who should be the nominee and who can beat Barack Obama is the Republican who can tap that Reagan like optimism in this country and also the Reagan like moral outrage at the condition we find ourselves in — an outrage driven by conviction in a better way and a better set of principles rooted in freedom.

Right now, from the President to the rest of the field save Cain, they are saying the words, but they sound angry and defeatist. They say America’s best days are ahead of us like they think we really are in decline.

Right now, America just needs someone with a warm smile, a heavy amount of indignation at where Washington has led us, and a vision and real hope for a better tomorrow. The candidate who delivers that will win. We need a happy warrior.

Tags:

COMMENTS

  • politicalqrm

    You (and I and many others) are really looking for a Ronald Reagan. He had a love for America that was a cornerstone for his beliefs. It showed in his rhetoric, his actions; you could feel it as he spoke.

    You’re right: the candidates are saying the words, but they do sound angry. Cain ‘s love of country comes out strong; Romney (the supposed frontrunner) acts like the office is already his and he’s going through the motions.

    What we’re really looking for is someone who loves America. Pure and simple. And if they really love America, they will do everything to keep it strong, keep its people protected and allow them to flourish.

    Obama hates America; that’s obvious. And as he said, he’s “transforming America” We don’t want to be transformed, and we don’t want our traditions forgotten or changed.

    Our love of nostalgia and doing things that bring us back to our traditions is indicating that we want our country back.

    All we need is a leader that wants that, too.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    This is how Politico characterized it…

    FIRST IN SCORE ? PERRY GOES POSITIVE WITH NEW WEB VIDEO: The Perry campaign will release an uplifting video this morning that touts the Texas governor?s job creation record and highlights his energy plan. The two-and-a-half-minute web video intersperses footage from Perry?s Friday Pittsburgh speech with feel-good Americana b-roll and overlays it with an optimistic score. Watch: http://bit.ly/mVwxxg

    …when compared with that of Romney….

    EXCLUSIVE ? ROMNEY LAUNCHES CAREERPOLITICIAN.COM: A new anti-Perry site just went live: careerpolitician.com. The Romney campaign will flesh it out soon, The centerpiece for now is a 60-second web video called ?The Facts? that attacks the Texas governor. It says over one million Texans are unemployed, the unemployment rate in the state is at its highest since 1987 (double what it was when Perry became governor in 2000) and ?nearly half of new jobs in Texas over the last four years went to illegal immigrants.? The site: http://bit.ly/pXoG1J The video: http://bit.ly/nHsMoU.

  • http://www.planettron.com NickDeringer

    We the people have the power to change the country. We have been lulled into this idea of “politician as savior” and we have come to depend on one man to ride in and save the day.

    We have forfeiteded our rights and power to the ruling class believing that some how they would do the right thing. In our town we have a pro-life, crisis pregnancy center that is supported by donations from local churches. It will prevent more abortions in 1 year than Perrry, Romney, Cain, Gingrich or Bachmann will in 8 years.

    No POTUS will save our country. We will.

  • thundercatkp

    Apple…maintaining job security for the USPS…sorry FedEx nice try :)

    Erick have you been down there with the Squatter’s inhaling? j/k Selling HOPE…I wasn’t around in the 60′s but I’m getting a Retro, Free Loving, Tree Hugging let’s just give peace a chance tingly feeling just reading your post.

    Campaign slogan:Let’s Go Retro!!

    Maybe we could try just this term: A group effort…a love feast. No losers anyone running right now…their in. Let’em fight it out in the White House behind closed doors. Jezz if the Republicans win Congress…we probably would be better off..

    So while the next few years are wasting away in Margaritaville. A Happy Warrior on a unicorn will emerge with some of that HOPE and enough fear of failure to turn it all around.

    Karen

  • trutexan

    I love most the line at the end, “Make what American’s buy, and buy what American’s make.”

  • jedison

    I didn’t see any “Happy Warriors” last night and, sadly, I don’t think there will be any in 2012. We’re going to have to pick someone from this group and do our best to push them over the finish-line.

    Nostalgia is great, but we also need a vision for the future at the same time. Reminds me of Tom Petty’s “Big Weekend” song when he says “You can look back babe, but its best not to stare…”

  • trutexan

    Now why would they do that? They have to buy a gazillion sewing notions made in China and hock sub-standard fabrics cut on short cutting tables so your to-be drapes pile on the floor during the cutting process. And there’s always the wonderful experience of hunting down a bored-looking teen clerk who looks like they fell face-first into a tackle box. Yep, nostalgia.

    This is exactly why I’m opening a neighborhood sewing center when I’m downsized from the federal government in December (BTW, thanks for that BO). If it’s good enough for Wal-Mart, it’s good enough for me…but with longer cutting tables & sans the tackle-box face.

    I think Perry did well last night and certainly showed he’s still in the top tier. And I also think Cain’s 999 plan took the beating it deserved. Santorum & Backman had nothing to lose so they came out swinging and gave all they could. Great debate.

  • kywrite

    Walmart has carried fabric in many of their stores for at least a decade, much longer than they’ve had grocery superstores. I have containers filled with fabric I picked up there for cheap. I have no idea what kind of point you’re trying to make here.

  • diehardcon

    Of course I’m referring to your trip to DISNEYWORLD!! While you have correctly identified a series of social maladies, and the inevitable longing for a past better time, you cannot then conclude that Obama will win because his republican opponent is not filled with happy talk and bursting optimism. Your reference to Reagan is instructive, not because 30 years later most everyone remembers him for his “optimism”, but rather because he ran a thoroughly negative campaign for the purpose of nailing the government as the CAUSE of the problem, which few people remember, or were even alive to hear. This was heresy to say openly, as liberalism was the accepted polity. Reagan attacked liberals in both parties. His most famous, and many believe, the pivotal moment in the nomination contest, was his outburst of anger at being denied the microphone at a republican debate. Recall also there were no conservative media outlets with broad reach as there are today. Reagan was never going to get to talk much about the shining city until he convinced the voters that no change was possible until they acted to reverse the growth of the government. Now, the inescapable fact is that we ARE in decline, and our candidate must bravely communicate that our situation won’t improve until we all acknowledge the historically proven cause. May I remind you that this is precisely what Perry hit upon in his announcement speech, when he so simply and inspiringly said “WE FIX THINGS!”, referring to what has made America the great symbol of freedom and justice it is. I do not think we need to feel nostalgia or even despair now; we need to understand that there is a time for negative argument, and have faith that our collected wisdom and democratic processes will produce American greatness again.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    2006 and 2008 proved that negative messages *do* work. It’s not pretty, but it does work.

    That said, it’s tough for Republicans to come up with positive messages sometimes. When crime was bad, we could talk about that, but we already won that battle. When the Cold War was raging, we could talk about that, but we already won that battle.

    Now the face of security and safety is TSA, and we don’t *have* a positive message. We can only take away the hurt.

  • lakeshore

    As much as we all want to daydream about “It’s Morning in America”, we don’t have to find Reagan the 2nd to win each time. We just need a candidate who is honest and believable and is a true leader. My fears from weeks ago, that the campaign would become negative and that they would start tearing each other down, creating a weaker nominee, are becoming realized. However, it also gives us all a chance to see how each would hold up next year. I think if even Ronald Reagan was running this year, the other Republicans would be tearing him down, finding every fault, and painting him as too much of one thing or not enough of something else. But I think the country as a whole already decided to “un-elect” Obama about a year ago. He used up whatever trust a new president gets, and is seen as so arrogant by so many. I think Karl Rove would describe the GOP nominee’s need as to simply be an acceptable alternative, not too extreme (as perceived by independents) or too unlikable (whatever that means to the majority), and then he/she wins. I never thought Obama was a great speaker, compared to a JFK, for example. He’s very beatable, and will be, baring a 3rd party threat from the middle or the right.

  • susanbryg

    I don’t think that Perry did well last night because he made attacks on other candidates for no reason. Newt offered ideas not criticism, and Herman, with the bulls eye on his back, handled his critics well and did it with humor.

    Santorum looked as if he was about to cry at any minute and his attacks were petty and small. We need to see cohesion. It was the attacks of the candidates that caused the boos from the audience.

    While any candidate is HUGELY better than what we have now, Cain will be able to offer the hope and encouragement to a broken land. I get excited when I think of all of the discouraged kids, especially from impoverished homes, that see him as a shining example of the American Dream and what is possible for them if they will just work for it.

    If BO (and he does smell) gets 4 more years, our nation is doomed.

  • lakeshore

    I meant to include, that what Romney needs to do, if he wants to “seal the deal” with primary voters, is to describe his evolution as a conservative. Tell us how he grew, and changed, if he now sees things in the more “Right” way. I think he has a better chance of honing his message over time than the other candidates, to appeal to both the Right and the Center. However, part of me also sees Herman Cain as a rising star–assuming he learns to combine discretion with his passion when speaking. And the prospect of taking away a fraction of the black vote in 2012 makes he smile.

  • cacharlie

    America’s hope resides in voters who appreciate people like Cain who offer hopeful, positive, expert leadership instead of pretending theiy know it all.

    Last night on TV, I heard a psychotherapist nail what makes protesting pathological – claiming to be 100% right. Cain’s “old fashioned” due diligence in making the best of his own abilities will serve us all well in the White House.

  • circlegranch

    and while EE expresses that longing for a simpler time when America was stronger, more revered and families were more intact, to come away from last night’s debate with the sense that Obama will win because he has the better message of hope means we all didn’t get enough sleep.

    America has seen Obama’s brand of hope and we know its leading to riots in our streets, bread lines, people giving up on looking for work and our precious grain being burned for fuel because we’re too stubborn to use the fossil fuels our nation is blessed with. We’ve seen our kids taught garbarge in our schools and we read about our soliders no longer being able to to MIA bracelets and not being able to fire on a enemy until fired on first. We’re watching Europe burn a slow and miserable death and we know the same hacks that are running our govt have signed their names to the same death certificate for America.

    I’m old enough to be EE’s grandad so I know about front porches and neighbors visiting and taking food over when a new baby comes or an elder in a family goes to their reward. I said the Lord’s Prayer in school and my high school football team never took the field without holding hands in the huddle and bowing their heads. We went pheasant hunting this time of the year and didn’t have permits or worry of offending someone either by owning a gun or killing an animal. Everybody else did the same thing. It was the norm in that simpler time. Yet with all that PR-incorrect behavior going on as I grew up and raised my family, the world didn’t catch on fire. We all want a simpler time and we do crave a nation again where a child can walk to a corner store because that store is still open, or can walk with a friend to the library without the fear of kidnapping or worse. We want our America back. We want our lives back. We want to be able to sleep at night. Barack Obama has proven one thing in his Hope message: He isn’t going to deliver. His vision of America is rot and failure and being the prey of a government that dictates and controls. He likes seeing old neighborhoods bulldozed because there’s no hope of them being revitalized in his America. He wants every immoral form of behavior to be legal and accepted. He’s on a different page than we are in the history book of America. We will turn that page and move past his failures and with young folks like EE out there being wistful about the good old days; the good old days in some form will return. (I’d caution the younger generation to not rely on technology to find out how to go about it. Put your “i” this or that aside and talk to people still around that know how to split wood by hand or make a quilt. If you think using an app to learn about Americana is fun, wait till you try it first hand. Take your young kids to Williamsburg, get off on a country road and let them watch a combine roll through a cornfield, take them to a county fair and spend as much time in the livestock buildings as on the midway. The America your grandparents and great grandparents built is still there; just put down your electronics and go find Her.

    For an old guy, its amusing to get up early and listen to the Joe Scarborough’s of our decaying media grace us with their self-absorption and pompous reflection of last night’s debate. Poor ol’ Rick Perry got accused of being asleep during the last one so he stands up and shows the nation that Mr. Romney is easily rattled when attacked and who is criticized in the mix? Rick Perry, of course. Last night on Greta over at Fox, she and Mrs. Palin tore into him too, talking about how he attacked Romney and piled on. Really? Not one of these folks had any problem with the onslaught of attack after attack Perry has been through on those debate stages. But, the media has ordained Romney as their man and any suggestion that he’s not got that squeaky, perfect record they’re trying to spin us with means the other person attacks unfairly.

    One thing I hope the rest of the GOP saw last night is this: Romney can’t take a punch. He refuses to allow another to talk, he constantly fast-talk’s and tries to out-talk everybody. With his constant, “Let ME speak!” and “In my view” and “ah, ah, ah” routine, he and Obama are going to be a sight for these old eyes when they debate. Wonder where they’ll hold them so there’s enough for both those huge egos? Both are self-proclaimed know-it-all’s.

    EE quoted Romney from last night but for me, the line that stuck in my mind is “If you want to be president of the United States, you have to let both people talk.” First of all, he has a habit of laughing at people. He’s condescending and has taken on an incumbent attitude. He’s been buying endorsements and practicing in a mirror for the last 5 years yet he acts like he’s been in charge of something. As president, if he’s going to return to fiscal responsibility, bring us back from the brink of no return and wants to roll back Pelosi’s policies, there’ll be no room for ‘talking’ with the other side. We’ve heard from them and its time for them to sit down and shut up until they can put American exceptionalism in its purist form back in play. Sounds like Romney wants to do alot of talking. Sounds like a ‘moderate’ presidency to me.

  • powertothepeople

    and things of the past and more about a resonating message that does not sound like a crap sandwich.

    Obama gave everyone the feel good nostalgia message in his 08 run, made everyone long to be in glory land with him leading the way, and almost 3 years later they realize it will never be 1950 again and no matter how much the Japanese scientist says it will taste good, crap sandwiches still taste like crap.

    Whoever wins must stop the pretty talk and the pandering and give people real hope about current issues such as jobs, immigration, debt, and so on. We are looking to someone who tells us what we need to hear, not what makes us feel good. The age of innocence or nostalgia is gone and what we have left is the reality that our government has abused their position for years and the only two remedies we have is the democrat one that states we all are too blame for their actions and now we will have to pay for their actions or the republican one (if it is actually stated and followed up on) that it is the governments fault and the government must make the hard decisions in order to secure our future.

    The only ones who dream of so called nostalgia are the ones squatting around the different cities demanding school loans be forgiven, that the government makes it to where everyone has the same pay no matter the job, that the government hires 15 million out of work at $40,000 yr, that….well you get the point. The rest of the nation sees them for what they are, dirty communist hippies who need to go.

    So no, we do not need a pipe dream and a crap sandwich called nostalgia, we need the truth. If the republican winner comes up with that truth no matter how harsh it may be, they will win. If they bring pretty rainbows and feel good nonsense, Obama will serve a second term.

  • TSquared

    Regan was a once in a life time….

    Right now I would settle for an acceptable/viable Not Romney candidate. Had high hopes for Perry when he entered the stage. Hopes have dwindled. His tongue is thicker than my shoe. We’ll need a good champion (in terms of communications) that can defend well his policies, conservatism, and by extension – us. Perry just doesn’t appear to be it.

    Who’s that leave? Bachmann and Santorum just aren’t going to “get er done.” Paul? Please… Huntsman who? That leaves Cain and Newt.

    I like Cain, but there some “buts” with him. I lack confidence in Cain on a handful of fronts (foreign policy to name one.)- and his performance yesterday and last night didn’t put me anymore at ease. You can certainly say that he “misspoke” on the notion of trading Gitmo prisoners for one GI hostage. What other gaffes are coming our way to send this train flying off the rails?

    Newt… I think he’s due a second look. He’s clearly head an shoulder above the rest on that stage in many facets, to include his ability to communicate and his grasp of the issues. Sure, I’m aware that he’s committed some conservative heresies in the past, but show me a perfect conservative on that stage. The question is – will some of that 70 percent looking for the viable “Not Romney” candidate now start walking away from Cain and to Newt?

    I think that all would agree that it’s been a disaster since the Democrats won congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008. However, the playing field will never get any better than it is today when it comes to putting a Conservative in the White House (and taking the Senate). Why on earth – especially in these serious times – would anybody consider wasting this opportunity by choosing “Democrat Lite” for our nominee? You looking to get kicked in the teeth again re. Bush/McCain and Campaign Finance Reform or Amnesty?

  • spinoneone

    As Satchel Page famously said, “Never look back. The bastards might be catching you.” That, in a nutshell, is the problem with looking back. We can learn from our mistakes by looking back briefly, but we can never really go back. So, looking to the future, what can we do to influence and shape what is to come? Remember that 0 offered, “Hope and Change” and is in the midst of delivering it in spades. What most of us thought H/C would be turned out to be wrong. 0 told us right up front about some of what he wanted and broadly hinted at the rest. We got a lot more than we bargained for of the socialist/Marxist/progressive “gravy” train.

    We need someone we perceive to be a leader with a plan we can support. For me, that will probably be Cain or Perry. I don’t think we can pair them, so who might be #2 will also count.

  • sharp

    Erick, this is my first negative reaction to one of your opinions.

    It sounds like you are drowning in bad advice from close friends – or just completely frustrated by what happened in last nights’ debate.

    Yes, Cain is a positive voice. But, I think you wish he was saying what is coming out of Newt’s mouth.

    My suggestion is not that we all just acquiesce, and support Cain, in spite of his weaknesses – but that you convince Newt to join forces with Cain, and help Cain get some of his ideas through congress. They would make a good team, and Newt would turn Cain into an effective President.

    Cain needs to be convinced of his improved potential, should he make this agreement, and of his impending loss if he does not make some changes.

    I have no contact with either of these men, but you do know who they listen to. So, I am asking you, Erick, to be something more than an expert analyst, and turn your energy towards solving the puzzle.

  • TSquared

    I enjoyed your comments immensely… Good read…

  • evas

    has just discontinued its fabric department after many years, and I miss it.
    Erick, that was a terrifying bombshell you dropped so casually in the middle of your post. God help us, everyone pray!

  • http://www.sunshinestatesarah.com SunshineStateSarah

    Heh. I wrote something similar last month:

    http://www.sunshinestatesarah.com/2011/09/herman-cain-happy-warrior.html

    Great minds thinking alike, hmmm? ;)

  • malvernpa

    Regan is not coning back. Our fight is with an out of control government in many places from the jerk arresting kids at a lemonade stand to the jerk sending Americas best into Uganda. American government is in decline not America and we can fix that but that monster will not go quietly. Sit on your rocker if you want to but do so with your Ipad in hand staying informed about the idiocy that Democrats ( liberals, communists, socialists, Marxists, they are all the same in the current Democrat party) continue to drop in American lives. The truth will set you free and the truth is that Democrats and RINOS made this mess and continue to keep their big government dream alive. We conservatives “are on the right path”, KNOW THAT TO BE TRUE. “This is a 10th amendment fight” and the founders knew that we would have this fight one day. We individually and as a group cannot win this even with a Regan in the White House. We began in 2010 with the surge in state house legislatures and Republican governors. We must vote in the right people at all levels but the states will be the force to roll back big federal government not one group not one party or even one President the “tool is the 10th amendment” and anyone on that debate stage will help take us where we need to go, not because of them but because of who we conservatives have become. When 26 states took on Obamacare the energy shifted, are you watching Obamacare unravel. We were the sleeping giant and we are no longer asleep and have not been since 2009, that changed with the Tea Party. We are informed, we are connected, we are quietly working and we will defeat Obama and Democrats ( and RINOS) at very nearly every level of governance in America in 2012. The liberals want to get our undies in a wad but that is for the halls of high school behavior which they, CNN, MSNBC,PBS, ABC,CBS never grew out of. Their shallow and simplistic thought and behavior is magnified in OWS but the OWS crowd is no less misdirected than those networks. For the first time in decades government is beginning to fear the people not because of the OWS crowd but because they know the OWS crowd will fall apart. The democrats are like Will Ferrel running naked down the street in Old School thinking there is a large following behind him, he was alone and looking stupid no less than the Democrats and Obama look stupid. There is NO large following for the OWS crowd, the networks are trying to make it look like there is but in a world of web cams and camera phones that day is over. Do not tell me we cannot fix this or we cannot win this next election. Just because the Tea Party is not running down the hall with our hair on fire does not mean we are not at work on the very foundations of our government. The next president will probably have 2 SCOTUS appointments if that does not get you energized nothing will. Fear not all will be well with America, we can do this.

  • blooch

    I also have to say that someone who puts his hand on your shoulder during a discussion or disagreement is usually a condescending, patronizing manipulator who is trying to interject his physical size into an argument when his reasoning has failed him.

  • junglecogs

    Erick, on a side note, Charles Peterson is an American artist who paints ?nostalgia?; he is so good that his paintings are haunting.

    Norman Rockwell?s work will make you smile; Charles Peterson’s will bring a tear to your eye longing for yesterday.

  • Ausonius

    Some years ago a German teacher watched a news items about a neighborhood in Toledo which organized itself to eliminate tree debris after a bad storm. A few days later another news item came on about a woman who organized a fund-raising effort to help a family whose child needed an operation.

    The German’s comment was striking, as was his bewilderment: “Such things would never happen in Germany.”

    In socialist-minded Germany, nobody would think that they were allowed to take such actions on their own. There would be fear that somehow it would be illegal to start clearing debris from somebody’s yard, or to raise money for a family down on their luck.

    A German would wait for the government to do something.

    An old observation about France is also relevant here: an American and a Frenchman see a limousine go by in New York. The American says: “Some day I will have a car like that!”

    The Frenchman sneers and says: “NOBODY should be ALLOWED to have a car like that!”

    Any of this sound familiar?

  • barleycorn

    I have no idea why trutexan’s post bothered you so much but he/she is correct. WalMart recently announced they would be broadening their fabric and notions lines. You can read all about it at one of these links .

    http://www.hometextilestoday.com/article/537847-Fabric_among_products_Walmart_will_begin_stocking_again.php

    http://www2.highlandstoday.com/content/2011/aug/21/LCNEWSO1-fabrics-back-at-walmart/news-newbusiness/

    Is there any subject that won’t get us yipping at each other?

  • circlegranch

    and you can’t have it both ways. First, they said he bumbled, then he was asleep, last night he finally started the necessary errand of taking Romney to the woodshed. Long overdue. Try being a border state gov and then spout off; there’s no ‘magnent’ in the tuition deal. Consider the 2 options of parents coming across the border: they themselves have had little more than a 4th grade education. Education is not on their minds. Survival, shelter and food for their kids is. Which would you choose? Cross into a border state and get signed up for all the social welfare programs and have immediate relief, or are you thinking about how you’ll find the money to pay that instate tuition to send your kid to an American college? Romney doesn’t mention that these kids have stringent entrance requirements and that they are closely monitored for GPA and attendance. They have to find their own money to go and he acts like the state of TX pays the freight. And, those photo ID’s issued to students are not acceptable to vote (Perry signed legislation this summer that requires photo ID to vote). Romney doesn’t talk about the SCOTUS case, Plyler v Doe, and its long lasting impact on education in Texas. Weak on illegal immigration? Wonder why Perry signed law that does not allow driver’s licenses for illegals then? Fence? Try building a fence along a river and what about the thousands of acres that are privately owned? Perry believes in the 10th amendment and he signed law protecting personal property rights and defense against eminent domain. A man’s ranch and property means something in Texas. Let the fed’s get out of the way and allow that property owner to defend his own. A virtual fence, drones, boots on the ground holding the same deadly weapons as we’ve sold to the drug lords on the other side will do more than building a 30 ft fence which can be scaled or tunneled under.

    It was long overdue for Perry to return some well deserved swings at the glass-jawed, East Coast liberal Republican. If Romney wants to pick fights, he’ll get them from the Texas governor.

    As for Cain, he clearly is running against Pawlenty for the Romney veep spot. Unfortunately, Romney will not likely choose him and if he does, Cain has already created a caricature of himself which is sadly beginning to look much like that of Joe Biden—the plain spoken funny guy that can always be counted upon to say about anything if it’ll get applause and a rise out of an audience.

  • 4suramcan

    have allowed all that is happening to America by standing by and doing nothing. And if anything is done to bring America back, it will be done by “we, the people”, not by politicians. For long ago, they ALL sold us out and are still doing it. Right in front of our noses.

  • sharp

    Hey Sarah, I like your website, and enjoyed reading the review of last nights’ debate.

    Good work.

    BTW, my earlier comment was not simply a Cain endorsement, but a suggestion for how he could take his campaign to the finish line.

    I think Newt is the key to Cains’ future. Plus (as a realist) it seems to me more reasonable that voters would ignore Newts’ baggage if he were the VP candidate.

    RE: Presidential Primary Evolution – it is time for candidates to declare their “team” as part of their platform, BEFORE we vote in primaries.

    Example: if Cain were to choose Romney as his Veep (since there are some reports of their friendship), I would not vote for Mr. Cain in the primary. I do not want to blindly think I’m voting for one philosophy – and then get surprised, after the fact, with a different image.

    If Romney declares that he wants Cain, and not Bachman, as his Veep – it tells us several things. Bachmann would realize she is being used or played by Romney. Cain would be diminished by association, and I would vote for Newt, instead of Cain.

    Plus, it makes the entire campaign more interesting (and also there is that transparency thing!).

  • eddiethegeek

    FAITH is the bedrock upon which America was founded and built, but religious faith in America is and has been waning for some time now. It is being replaced by faith in government. That is the only god our President believes in – the god of the US government.

    Until and unless there is a return to real religious faith (that really means faith in Jesus Christ, or religious adherence to Judaism), I believe our nation will continue to crumble and rot.

    Perhaps the impending world disaster that is the fruit of socialism will convince us that faith in government is a false god; probably not.

    If a candidate could articulate both a hopeful vision AND personal faith, perhaps that candidate could still be elected. Or are we too far gone for that? Surely such a candidate would be ridiculed by the secular, leftist mainstream media.

    Can America still summon enough moral decency to elect a real leader, a man (or woman) of faith in God and hopeful optimism, to truly LEAD US? 2012 might be our last, best chance. But who is that candidate?

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    One candidate that wouldn’t attack the others has already been run out of the race.

    From my chair, the only candidate on message that wants to move us forward, and has the knowledge and experience is Newt. I don’t know if he can survive long enough to start raising significant funds, but I know that McCain was almost out last time and somehow got through.

  • czs

    Thanks, Erick!

  • streiff

    in 2012 we have a once in a couple of generations opportunity to run as “I’m not the other guy” and make that a compelling proposition.

    If Obama can win on fear and loathing so can we.

  • izoneguy

    Then vote for Mitt.
    But don’t expect to see much difference from Obama.
    Romney sees the federal govt. as the solution.
    Look at what 3 years of govt. “solutions” have brought us.
    Romney stands at the debate podium and offers us his private sector
    experience as the solution. – Yes his solutions are top down Wall Street
    accounting gimmicks. Isn’t this what the OWS protestors are in knots about?
    If the Republicans offer up Mitt Romney the first spots from Obama
    will be showing OWS protestors with Mitt Romney’s face as a backdrop.

  • jackdaniels11

    Nostalgic for the days when there was a national sales tax. My grandmother told me about the 9% national sales tax that she paid when she bought her first car in 1952.

    The president at that time was, like all presidents in the old days, completely inexperienced in government and learning while on the job. We used to swap prisoners with al-Qaeda and the Haqqani Terrorist Cartel the same way farmers used to swap chickens for a gallon of milk. (They still had to pay the 9% national sales tax because barter was not exempted from the tax.)

    Ah the good old days…

  • unclefred

    That is merely the focus of the MSM’s lens. We don’t see the people who get up everyday and go work two jobs to ensure their families are sheltered and fed. We don’t see the young people voluntarily joining the military to defend this nation not for eventual benefits but because they believe it’s goodness and greatness demand their protection. We don’t see people gathering around a table to work to oust an out of control official. We don’t see someone starting their own business, risking their capital and spending their sweat and time because they believe in themselves and an idea.

    There are millions of acts of strength, pride, and determination that we don’t see, that happen every day. Yes we have problems in the nation. Deep seated and long standing problems, but as you note people are mad as hell and are focused on fixing this mess. They don’t expect it to be easy or even certain, but they are going to do it anyway.

    That is why Obama will NOT be president in 2013.

  • unclefred

    not sure why it ended up here…

  • jackdaniels11

    I appreciate Gov. Perry staying positive in his ads. If all of the candidates would make a gentleman’s agreement to do so, we’d have a better shot of sending BHO back to Chicago next year.

    And I now get the Perry candidacy better than I used to. Perry’s record on job creation is something that every governor in America should be studying and copying.

    Liberals are driving blue-collar jobs overseas. Not only that, they are also driving white-collar jobs overseas. America is losing the edge that it once had over foreign competition.

    And all BHO can offer is “pay phone solutions” to the problem like “tax the rich” and “create make-work government-funded temporary jobs”.

  • meleka

    What an excellent post circlegranch. I too have lived the simpler life and remember the things you so wonderfully describe and always wanted those things for my grandchildren. I am an eternal optimist always searching for the one that will give me that ‘hope’. Not ‘hope and change’ that was promised, altough I never once fell for that line. The only transparency was the candidate himself in ’08. You could see right through him and his minions. But I do have to say that I went to see Rick Perry when he made a stop in California…..a state that he knows will always be blue…..yet he said we were a raspberry in a blueberry pie……and there it was…the minute he entered the platform….he exuded that ‘hope’ I had been searching for. There was an air of calm around him and assurance that he could and would do the right thing. Did it come out in the first couple of debates – no – and in this microwave society we have created, that is too bad because Rick Perry the man, offers a return to all the things we wish to return to. His love of God, Country and mankind shines through when you see him and listen to him speak in person.
    All I can say here is give the man an opportunity, you won’t be disappointed if in fact you are truly searching for that ‘shining citiy on the hill’ because from what I’ve seen in person (not on the debate stage) Rick Perry can start us climing up that hill once again.

  • jackdaniels11

    you have to go negative in the primaries. People don’t vote because they love their candidate. They vote because of the primal emotions of fear and loathing. Fear of a country run by “the other guy”. Loathing of “that other guy and the party/policies he represents”.

    GWB went negative on McCain in 2000 and won the nomination. Reagan attacked GHWB in 1980 and got the nomination.

    I hope that once the dust is settled from the primary, we can all unite around our candidate.

  • 4suramcan

    And we cannot go back there. We must go forth with the rest of today and tomorrow. But we must remember it and learn from the lessons taught.

  • jackdaniels11

    Cain doesn’t have enough government experience.

    Sarah Palin (also I personally loved and still love her) was roundly criticized by liberals and their willing accomplices in the media for being “too inexperienced” in government, despite the fact that she had more experience in running a state than BHO did.

    Romney needs to pick someone from the South who will give his campaign a sense of energy and freshness. I personally favor Marco Rubio or Jeb Bush. I also like Gov. Bob McDonnell from Virginia. Sen. Jim Demint would also be a great choice. Or Sen. John Cornyn of Texas.

  • http://parsoned.blogspot.com parsoned

    It’s got to be Gingrich, Cain, or Perry. It cannot be Romney the plastic ego man.

  • jackdaniels11

    He was a lousy Treasury Secretary (although I’m not sure what Treasury Secretaries actually do) and an even worse chief-of-staff.

    ; )

  • wbf

    Herman Cain has a sanguine outgoing personality, that is his natural temperament. These personality types just light up a room when they come in. They make us feel good. They have strengths and weaknesses just like other basic temperaments.

    But there was not one candidate on the stage last night that can solve
    America’s decline. Oh, they can make policy decisions that may help the economy but America’s problem is very deep and real and it is sin.

    Our pulpits are not the pulpits of our country at her birth. And we are not the same either.

    America now believes she can live as if God does not exist.
    This is reflected in our families.

    Who weeps over this? Not many. When we start weeping and seeking God then He will work to renew America because He is merciful.

    For my part, I am asking Him to teach me how to pray and to give me grace to be faithful to pray. Prayer is work. Prayer is THE MOST IMPORTANT work.

    My favorite book on prayer is by O. Hallesby. My copy is worn and marked up and I am taking it down off the shelf to study again.

  • jackdaniels11

    We need Citizen Cain because he’s the most “optimistic” of the three front-runners.

    I agree with the comment upthread about how the anger of 2006 and 2008 were what caused lop-sided election wins. Anger against the liberals and their incompetence caused the Great Wave of 2010.

    The left is trying to deflect that anger toward Wall Street rather than admit that their guy is responsible for the cratering economy.

    When Bush was president (either Bush, you pick), they tagged him (them) with responsibility for the economy. Why is it so hard for the left to understand that they must take the same sauce that they’ve been dishing out since, oh, 1932? The president has to take responsibility. The buck stops on BHO’s desk.

  • jackdaniels11

    He was much better suited for the private sector than for government. It’s Ronald Reagan that I miss so much.

    I’d like to see a candidate like Reagan. I don’t see any candidate who is exactly like Reagan this year.

    I believe that what made Reagan so great was that he knew when and how to fight and he knew when and how to compromise IN THE INTEREST OF FURTHERING THE CONSERVATIVE CAUSE.

    Rick Perry and Herman Cain have no experience in working across party lines to make deals. We can and must work out a deal with our ancient enemies, the Democrats, if we are to get the economy back on track and stop all of this runaway spending and borrowing.

  • carolina

    I hope he does more and more of this. I believe he has the character that we need in the WH. I hope he can get his strength past the lame stream media spin. That is a difficult challenge, that has not been helped by his debate performances.

  • jackdaniels11

    And Jimmah Carter didn’t have 10% unemployment happen on his watch.

    2012 will be a wave election. If we pick a candidate who can rally the base AND entice centrists and intelligent Democrats, we can get BHO out of the White House and save America at the same time.

  • jackdaniels11

    “Drawing on the Powers of Heaven” by Grant Von Harrison.

  • wbf

    Prayer touches God’s heart and brings Him into the situation.
    It changes us too.

  • http://parsoned.blogspot.com parsoned

    You’ve hit on his biggest job: please convince us that you are a conservative in your heart, not merely a salesman who will tell us anything we want to hear becuase you desperately want to be president.

  • tyman

    No wonder Michael Reagan has said that Rick Perry is the candidate most like his dad.

    I could easily see Ronaldus Magnus in place of Perry in that ad.

  • gator_hoo

    I’m not a native Texan, but moved here for the reason everyone moves here: jobs and opportunity, but I have two points on the Texas thing.

    First of all, that’s just the way Texans talk. Texans take a great amount of pride in Texas, and I would say that many consider themselves Texans first, and Americans second. But don’t misunderstand this as separatism, they see Texas more as quintessential America rather than a separate entity. When Rick Perry talks with pride with Texas, he is talking with pride about America. I admit that when I first moved here, I found the Texas thing to be odd, but I do rather enjoy it. Perry is just talking like all Texans talk, maybe it doesn’t play well for a national audience but it is a bit harsh to suggest he has a different vision for Texas than for the rest of the country.

    Secondly, I don’t really understand the criticism of talking about Texas. He is running as the Governor of Texas. I don’t see him doing much more than talk about what he accomplished in that role, which should be relevant to the debate. Just like Romney says, “what we did in Massachusetts” or Santorum talks about PA. What is he supposed to say? The reason he may talk about Texas more than the other candidates is because he is the only candidate running on his record. Mitt on the other hand, mentions he was governor of Massachusetts and then says, “but in no way will I do any thing like what I did as governor”. Cain doesn’t have a record at all.

    So maybe I have a different perspective, having acclimated to the Texas mindset, but it seems like an odd criticism to level against Perry.

  • rightwingmom52

    from my family, friends, co-workers, etc. about why they like Herman Cain and his message despite whatever faults they may see in him.

    Whoever the candidate is, I’m praying that he will successfully convey the message of conservatism which is indeed about hope and the greatness of America to a victory for our country and her citizens.

  • http://dezignworx-ae.com tsquare

    I think that with all the ‘Hope and Change’ in 2008, the voters next year are going to be looking for something more than feel good fluff, from anyone.

    Might be a time for a Churchill-like ‘Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat.’ campaign.

  • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

    The reason “negative messages” work… is they re-inforce the fear or outrage in the individual that provides them a reason to refute the target of the message.

    I think positive messaging is as effective and useful, but as you identified it’s difficult to speak positively in a toxic environment when so much is negative.

    President Reagan grew into his mantle over time and left a legacy that makes it difficult to not move beyond his negatives. (and yes I’m sure some believe he never had negatives… but I digress)

    Any Presidential Candidate has to recognize, that you don’t get the mantle by invoking the names of past Presidents or by quoting them in a quixotic picturesque remembrance.

    You don’t get the mantle by attacking or questioning the integrity of people you agree with most of the time.

    If some Americana mixed with American Exceptionalism is spoken of… The candidate is often excoriated in our current climate for not being “worthy” to talk about these things due to their record that proves they’re “not conservative” or they’re a “RINO”… and too often the chattering class that wants to go there are the candi-bots and the pundits.

    I don’t have a negative impression about ANY of the GOP candidates as far as Americana goes… and with exception of Luap Nor, everyone else on stage I think espouses the American Exceptionalism optimism that Erick’s talking about.

    I think if anything Erick’s identified that the childishness of last nights debate takes away from that optimism. And it does… to an extent. But not enough to assume that the message was damaged. And to your point, going negative works, once you’ve won the nomination, you let the healing begin and to coalesce the optimism into massive turnout.

    If anything is to be blamed about the negativity… I would point to these debate formats… its all about pitting one candidate against another to get soundbites out of each other so that when the “healing” time comes the MSM can reopen those wounds and pour salt on them…

    And for that reason I would hope that our candidates could be a little more reserved in their tactics on stage for “debate” points… if you’re going to go negative don’t do it in a debate… do it with imagery and music via a campaign ad… the debate is your opportunity to change negative impressions by “he/she seems nice”. The attack ads are separated from the faces of the candidates that fund them… so there’s somewhat of a firewall…

    But when you get an “ANGRY” face on… well that just sears in the minds of people… and that in and of itself becomes a self-generated negative.

  • cbartlett

    I AM a Texan and, despite a few reservations, I think Perry is the best choice in this field. I just wish he would stand up and say what all of his supporters says about him and quit beating on Romney! Circlegranch said more in this post than most people know about Perry and I have seen other writeups here on other Perry issues written a LOT better than Perry tells it. If he’d just defend his position in a positive way, people will see how different he is from flip-flop Romney. I thought most of the candicates acted like children at the debate last night. Maybe it was the stupid CNN format – I don’t know. I just want to know where the candidates stand on all of the major issues. Can’t we ask them all the same questions, get straight answers and quit this “attack the other guy” business? Where are the adults in the room? (OK – Newt is there – I just don’t think this country will elect him.) Sigh.

  • lineholder

    Cain’s belief in this nation and it’s people is definitely one of the things that is drawing people to him. But he’s shining a light in another way as well by directly attacking some of the basic precepts by which liberals are permitted to succeed in perpetuating their socialistic agenda…(1)wealth redistribution via our current tax code and (2)social inequalities due to economic status, race and/or both.

    On the first, as long as the concept of seriously going after restructuring our tax code doesn’t gain traction, the left will probably leave it be.

    On the second, black liberals have already sent out an appeal to the black community to stay loyal to Obama based on his race. This was on Oct. 17th.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/can-obama-hold-on-to-african-american-voters-in-2012/2011/09/30/gIQA1IeisL_print.html

    Black Conservatives are responding by drawing correlations of Cain as the runaway slave with the black overseers, under commands of the white liberal “massas”, who must contain and override Cain’s voice.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/10/herman_cain_runaway_slave.html

    Mr. Cain isn’t a stupid man by any stretch of the imagination, and I daresay he recognizes that populism alone won’t gain him a win in the Presidency race. It’s likely that when it comes right down to it, the powers that be who could support a win could decide against doing so for reasons of experience and electability.

    But he’s taking his shot at it all the same, and he’s challenging the strongholds of the left at the same time. That’s a bright light indeed these days. And I’m grateful to him for doing it, too.

  • mspector

    (which is debatable), then the one thing the VP does do is act as WH point man in the Senate. It’s a job that pretty much requires an insider to be done effectively. Otherwise, the job is purely ceremonial.

  • jonerik

    Perry’s message is the right one and he IS authentically optimistic. This comes through in his well produced ads and it comes through when he makes a stump speech or when he’s meeting directly with voters.

    But Perry has an achilles heel – adversarial debates. Romney does well in those because he’s done so many of them. Cain does well too, but we often forget that he’s been on the radio for some time, working out arguments via callers and guests. Gingrich is great at debates, but he’s been on the lecture circuit and political debating for literally decades. Perry is a total rookie when it comes to debating. He’s done a few over the years but not many, and you hardly ever see him out on the talk show circuit.

    His values are right. He IS a very optimistic and happy warrior generally. But the debates have greatly harmed the perceptions of who and what he is. His ideas and ethics are very much like Reagan, and I think he’s even more personable dealing directly with the public than Reagan was.

    He’s got to be a quick study at debating though. Otherwise none of these great attributes will get through and win hearts and minds.

  • mspector

    Obama did not run on “nostalgia.” His vision of America begins with the early 1960s, not the 1950s. He didn’t want to preserve anything great about this country, he wanted (and wants) to tear everything we think is great about this country down.

    I grew up in the 1950s and the one thing that sticks with me from those days is that America is all about a “can do” spirit and a solid work ethic. You aren’t “entitled” to anything, but if you can imagine the possibilities and go about working to achieve them, the sky is the limit.

    Herman Cain represents that, which is why he resonates. Romney is a child of privilege. Perry could represent that, but so far has not put it together. Bachmann represents it in many ways, but has not managed to pull it together yet.

    The GOP was once the party of simple virtues; Nixon referred to his wife Pat and her “good Republican cloth coat.” We need to represent that again. It isn’t about 9-9-9, it’s about the basic values that a candidate embraces and lives. If we do not run a real human being in 2012, Obama will win if only because plastic is what he knows best.

  • mspector

    OK, it’s a mistake to say openly that you will negotiate for the lives or release of Americans taken prisoner. But does anyone seriously think that we do not do so? Does anyone seriously think that Iran released the two hikers because they experienced a sudden burst of humanity? Cain’s problem here is not that he would negotiate, but that he was naive enough to say so.

  • jonerik

    Anyone remember ol’ Bob Dole’s campaign? “There was a better time in America…,” he would say wistfully. He would also mention, “I know, because I was there.” But Dole represented the past, and decidedly not the future.

    I don’t think Apple is tapping into any particular yearning for the nostalgia of America. They have an APP that helps people get nice things in the mailbox. People always like getting nice things in the mailbox, no matter how much digital messages there are in the universe. As far as the APP that helps people plan get togethers, well, isn’t that just saying our lives are driven by APPs? People have gotten together in small groups since the beginning of time, but now we need an APP for that? You see, the APP isn’t tapping into a latent nostalgic yearning for yesteryear, its infusing itself into what humans have been doing forever. If you want to set up a get-together, and you’re feeling nostalgic, don’t get the APP, get on the phone!

  • septembergurl

    intelligence and political acuity of Erick, I choose to believe that in this banal, idiotic post (much like his equally lame post last week on what conservatives and OWS have in common), he is playing devil’s advocate.

    That is, warning of the dangers of faux nostalgia for what we believe to be a simpler, better time. This should not guide us in the selection of our candidate.

    Let me tell you something: It has never been easy to be an American. It has never been simple to be an American. And it will never be easy to be an American. Being American means taking the hard road.

    Let’s take a problem — banks. Bailouts, too big to fail, Dodd-Frank,etc. Is our problem that we no longer deal with the Bailey S&L, where the owner knows us and our reputation in the community and acts accordingly? No, that is not our problem. That’s like Obama saying the ATMS cause unemployment.

    Our problem is bad legislation, bad government, bad practices by banking industry. In other words, they can be fixed, but not by nostalgia and happy talk. Here is an article that analyzes the problem and offers solutions:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204346104576635033336992122.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop

    **WARNING** This piece contains actual thinking.

    We’re heading into one of the worst periods in our nation’s history. There are going to be mass protests and occupations and actions that make OWS and Wiconsin look like picnics. And that’s the best case scenario, if the Republican wins. If Obama gets a second term, and he might, I don’t think we will survive as the nation we were.

    What we need is not nostalgia, but a President with sound conservative beliefs and the ability to stay the course in what is going to be, at best, a very unpleasant period.

  • center77

    of what you said, but I do not blame Perry for going for Romney’s and others necks. These Candidates beat on Perry hard when he came in, because they know his record was strong. Perry tried to keep it to what he wants to do, but because he was late getting in, he did not have a plan yet. He had to show he was able to fight, and because McCain was not willing to go after Obama he looked week. Slick talker may look good, but we need a fighter. Perry seems to only go negative on Republicans when they force him into a corner. Romney is going to get hit from the left like no other if he win (I still think he cannot win, conservative will see that Romney is weak and Cain is a fruit) every answer Cain gives does nothing but try to deflect the fact his plan will hurt so many people. If you make around 20,000 a year your taxes go up 950%. Cain hopes people will not notice, but that is just silly.

  • center77

    and it makes me lose any respect I had left for him. He is a politician, just a failed one. He ran for president, he ran for the senate. His sun shine attitude is nothing more than a smoke screen for the fact his plan will hurt most of the country. Since when is the next Reagan the guy who wants to hike taxes on 84% of the population. I understand Cain appeal, I signed up at his web site almost a year ago if not more, it was the day he announced. First he made the mistake of saying he would bar a person from working in his administration because of being a Mormon, but I let that slide. I thought he was different, but got to see a glimpse when he used the lefts race card against Perry. Then I watched him over and over use his race to bash his race as stupid brainwashed dums dums. He gets on TV because he says things a normal white politician could not say. He changes positions while still on stage, and he seems to think sucking up to Romney is the right thing to do.

  • lineholder

    shown below provides information as to how Cain’s 999 plan would impact the poor.

    http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/larrykudlow/2011/10/15/cain_the_tax-code_killer/page/full/

  • pttx333

    to the good Doctor, and a hearty THANK YOU to said Doctor for posting Perry’s fantastic video. Indeed, Perry is the man to turn around this ugliness. He has had my vote every time he has run for office, and that will not change for me.

    This great-grandmother remembers well the wonderful years growing up in West Texas many moons ago. We left our doors unlocked when we were gone, in case the neighbors might need something (cup of sugar, etc.). Nothing was ever stolen – ever. The guys in high school would drive to school in their pick-ups and park outside all day with rifles in the gun rack, doors unlocked, windows down, and nothing was ever stolen – ever. As kids, we could walk anywhere we wished with never a worry that someone might kidnap or harm us in any way. I’ve been rabbit hunting, dove hunting and, as you said, no license required. If you felt like going hunting, all you had to do was grab a gun, some ammo and go to your favorite hunting place. Those truly were the “happy days” when this country was a far more civil, polite and kind society and there was no such thing as the PC crowd. I’ve never practiced it and never will – it is so silly (rude, actually) and insulting.

    I pray for the correct outcome in 2012 so those things both you and I love and long for have at least a fighting chance of returning to our wonderful nation.

  • Common_Cents

    I agree that candidates need a balance of calling out Zero in Chief and providing optimism and solutions.

    A lot of our future success will be based on self fulfilling prophecy of optimism, combined with solid policy reducing govt misallocated capital (taxes) interference in our lives

  • pttx333

    message. For whatever reason, I knew him to be the slimy snake oil salesman that he is. Never did I buy anything he said. I’ve been in mourning since he was elected, because I knew full-well what he was and is about and what he intended to accomplished. Well, bingo – he’s almost brought us to our knees with very little recovery room left.

    I DO have nostalgia for the days when we were a totally different nation but also realize it will not return. But never have I bought into anyone’s pipe dreams or feel-good, pandering lies. They makes me shudder!

  • acat

    Optimism is a critical component, there must be some “happy” to balance the “warrior”.

    (Dole had the “warrior” schtick down, but lacked the “happy” to season it… I’d argue that the counterpoint is Huckabee, who has the “happy” down …)

    Mew

  • circlegranch

    and here’s why. All day today the story line is that Perry unfairly attacked poor Mitt. Politico labeled him a ‘bully’. Let’s rewind a few weeks to the first debate appearance by Perry. He came in knowing he was in the company of others wanting the job but I suspect he also felt he was at the same time among friends. It’s well documented that the Fox debate team concocted questions to trip him up. He got pummeled over and over in those first debates. Today, Hannity chats with Michelle Bachmann and comments that Perry and Romney didn’t do well because of the attacks Perry made. Really? It seems just like yesterday that Bachmann hounded Perry over the ridiculous Gardasil issue. Romney tag-teamed with immigration and border issues. Herman Cain quickly added that he’d be the vice president of anybody but Perry. How’s that for civility amongst fellow conservatives?

    The issues were real and it was fair game to get them out in the open. The burden was on Perry to be ready and to stay in the game. He faltered, his polling numbers dropped and didn’t we hear and read all the past week that this Las Vegas debate was going to be a do or die situation for Perry? There are a couple other important issues that also need careful examination by voters and Perry brought up the illegal Guatamalans that worked in both Gov. Romney’s yard and that of one of his sons. Santorum took him to the mat on RomneyCare, and Rick chimed in that Romney deleted comments in his book and had a reprint done. Fair game, as well, at least amongst those that practice Fairness and Balance in the political arena.

    Today while Hannity and Bachmann reviewed last night’s debate, Bachmann said again today that all candidates need to be vetted (apparently, both she and Romney are exempt). Yet, she indicated the direct questions Perry leveled at Romney were a distraction and she (Ms Holier Than Thou) just kept focused on Obama and that’s what she had hoped would happen last night. She gave the impression that Perry started a fight and Mitt had no choice but to respond. It was all an unfortunate distraction for Mrs. Bachmann since she didn’t want to talk about such things last night. Santorum somehow got a pass for his abrasive comments and of course, Romney emerged unscathed for his sharp remarks back to Santorum, Cain and Gingrich. Mrs. Bachmann had no problem with not focusing on Obama the night she harped like a nagging fish wife about Garadsil. Nope, Obama wasn’t the focus that night, but now that she’s inflicted her venom, she’s ready to get back to the issues of the day. Hannity, in all his resplendent hypocrisy, didn’t call her out. He didn’t suggest to her that when she wanted to attack Perry, she got away with it and he also didn’t ask her why she thinks it is that the one debate where Perry showed some real spunk, he’s attacked and maligned. When Santorum unloads on Romney, he’s passionate. When Cain gets cornered about 999 and releasing hostages, he’s just inexperienced and got caught off guard but still polling wonderfully. When Perry initiates legitimate conversation, he’s a bully and demeaned the entire debate with his embarrassing remarks.

    There is a genuine hatred of Rick Perry which is understandable on the part of Romney because he’s the biggest threat to Romney’s automatic nomination. Yet, whenever Perry has the opportunity before and after debates, he’s the man that is first to step forward and offer a handshake. The bias against one man that decided to come forward and answer the clarion call to try and turn this country around, applying the skills and knowledge and proven experience he has seen work is astounding.

    Fox and Hannity and the hacks that sit around all the different desks like bar flies night after night have lost my viewership. Mrs. Bachmann is no champion anymore in my book, either. I’m tired of her lack of courage to speak out from her pulpit of her so-called high moral ground on each candidate. She wants everybody vetted but her. She refuses to acknowledge the obvious weaknesses of some and breaks the 11th Commandment over and over at the expense of others. All the boxes she checks for herself as being someone with a flawless record– pro-life, 2nd Amendment, gay marriage, immigration, healthcare–its nothing short of stunning that she, time and again, refuses to open up her vitriol on Romney.

    I hope Perry continues to take it to Romney. He is unscathed but has the least conservative record of the lot. Win or lose, Perry will be able to hold to the virtue of telling the truth and serving the best interest of the public. When he’s wrong, he’ll admit it. He knows how to treat others with respect even in the heat of disagreement. And by the way, Mr. Romney, keep your hands to yourself next time.

  • pttx333

    tuned in to them almost 24/7, but that stopped a good while back. They had begun tacking farther and farther left (this was before Perry decided to run), and I just couldn’t take it any more. Back when Alan Colmes was still on with Hannity, it was all I could do to watch for 5 minutes. Then O’Reilly became more and more obnoxious, Geraldo is truly AWFUL, etc. I never tune in these days and will not do so unless and until they change their ways.

  • trutexan

    in nearly the same decade you mention. They did, then they didn’t. I missed it almost as much as I missed them carrying handguns. That too, is state/location specific.

  • Scope

    for having other front pagers that counter the seemingly ever changing beliefs of EE. Thank you Lord that we have a counter balance here.

  • fabio

    Erickson’s piece describes Gingrich perfectly. In addition to the features Erickson wants, Gingrich offers the same technocratic skill set allegedly possessed by Romney and his staff. He’s made mistakes in that regard, mistakes that most stalwart conservatives know of and understand, but there is no candidate who combines optimism, experience, and rhetorical skill like Gingrich.

  • circlegranch

    That venue would be ideal for Perry’s personality style and his ability to connect when its a setting that’s real, not these phony debates where you’re supposed to stand there with a plastic expression and regurgitate rehearsed talking points. When you think about it, who would want to say “I’m a good debater.” ? It’s not real life or real conversation.

    Last week Perry slam dunked interviews on CNN and Larry Kudlow. About a month ago he was on CNBC’s Squawkbox and did great. A man doesn’t hold on to a job running the world’s 14th largest economy because he’s incompetent. There has been a concerted, well planned agenda and set of marching orders formulated in the Establishment GOP to do this to him. They didn’t hear us very well over the last two years at tea parties and town halls, did they? We told them to keep their cronyism and insider tricks and games. That’s our money they’re spending and we have a say in what the heck is going on in this party and in this country.

    Did anybody read through that big article that appeared in the NY Slimes over the weekend about this? There’s alot of very smart, highly practical, informed patriotic people that take the time to blog at RS. There’s millions more that see what we see; that we’re being spoonfed a nominee and because of our anger and frustration with this president we’ll swoon just like the Idiot Vote did back in ’08 when they were desperate for Anybody but Bush. Last night America saw that Mr. Perfect Goes to Washington needs some editing because he’s sarcastic, agressive and thinks he can run rough shod over everybody else. Voters will have the final say and there’s about 75% of us that are unimpressed.

  • lastgopinillinois

    all along. Even before announcing entering into the race, I believe he had this strategy in mind. Haven’t you noticed how he seems to pander to the center. He has been a populist ever since the beginning of the campaign.

    He concocted a 21st century contract with America (which is supposed to be the culmination of ideas from a million American citizens), in keeping with the faith that our government is supposed to be of the people, by the people and for the people. His “on the first day” list of executive orders was supposedly done in the same way (by the people) to show that he is aware that it is the people that tells the government what to do. (the final list of course, would be edited to pass Constitutional muster)

    Yet I am skeptical. I am still feeling pangs of fear that he is an outright moderate and would be too accepting of compromising conservative principles. So in my view, Newt rallys the base and entices centrists as you describe. Newt sounds like your ideal candidate. He worries me as the next great compromiser.

  • timkellogg

    …on one point, I reckon; that bit about the president having no experience in government. Eisenhower was elected in 1952, though he didn’t take office until 1953, and he had no previous political experience and was learning on the job, as EVERY president does, to this day, especially regarding foreign policy. Ike wasn’t exactly a small-government guy, but he was a popular and successful president, was he not? The best you can hope for is good judgement and a mind accustomed to assessing a situation and working out a good way to deal with it. Nobody is prepared to be president, and I don’t consider familiarity with the blood-and-guts of politics or with the lobbyists to be particularly good preparation for the presidency.

    There wasn’t a national sales tax then, but there wasn’t a low, flat income tax, either. Considering these things separately is only useful for trashing the plan, not for evaluating it. There would be no sales tax on a used car, and I’ve been saying for years that folks have to be stupid to pay for a new car, the way they depreciate, especially on credit. A one- or two-year-old car is far cheaper in several ways and just as reliable. All used goods would be exempt from the sales tax in the plan, and barter, too. The sale of new houses would be taxed, but not existing houses, and the market needs existing homes to be bought-up before it can begin to recover and get new homes selling and being built again. Shifting taxes from income to consumption also encourages saving and thrift, discouraging reckless spending and overuse of credit (I, for one, think it is a good thing for the credit market to be much tighter than it was before the bottom fell out. All that easy money got us all in trouble). The idea of 9-9-9 is as a transition toward the Fair Tax, which would eliminate everything BUT the retail sales tax on new goods, but too many folks will have to see how the economy takes-off under 9-9-9 (in the lovely dream-world in-which this actually happens, and, no, there are no stupid unicorns in this dream world), for a significant number of them to understand that the Fair Tax would be even better. I, for one, think the income tax, in any form, is a far too convenient way for the government to keep too close of tabs on us (note that all the “poor” folks who don’t work above-the-table regular jobs don’t get monitored like us responsible folks who report every year how we made our living), and when all the tax is collected from consumption, there will be much more capital available all-over to help PRODUCE more wealth, in whatever way occurs to folks, and even drug dealers and pimps will pay taxes. If they’re the flashy types, they’ll likely pay more taxes than most normal folks, by far. Wouldn’t that be cool? Shift the tax burden onto the reckless spenders and rich, flashy show-offs, however they got their money? What a terrible idea…rewarding responsibility, enterprise and saving…

    The bit about swapping prisoners with terrorists is a stupid and false pretense that other candidates, even Mr. Slick-Mitt Romney, don’t occasionally misspeak. Cain is refreshing because, unlike all the politicians, when he misspeaks, he says, essentially, “my bad”, rather than acting like a weasel.

    Regarding all the hysterical carrying-on about the 9-9-9 plan, from ignoring key elements of the plan to pointing-out that liberal groups claiming to be “non-partisan” have evaluated the plan unfavorably, just as they have every Republican-proposed tax plan, to pointing-out the obvious fact that it has very little chance of passing (but, even though it won’t pass, ever, even the brazen act of suggesting such a thing makes Herman a maniac, OBVIOUSLY…): Cain would be happy to work with a Republican Congress interested in passing SOME kind of serious reform that broadens the tax base and takes away the complexity and engineering rigged into the current tax code, and if this changes from 9-9-9 to something different, but also simple and effective, I don’t believe his ego would prevent him from seeing its merit and signing it into law. I understand why politicians and liberals fear 9-9-9 so much. Other folks: I don’t get it. Do you think it’s a good thing to stick with the mess we have and just constantly tinker with all the exemptions and exclusions and loopholes? If any of the other candidates think, as many have said, “why not just a flat income tax”, that’s great, but why did not a single other candidate propose anything but fiddling with the current code before? Nobody but Herman Cain has had the nerve to even SUGGEST TRYING anything like the kind of serious reform we need, because the others all fear being treated like he is being treated. Herman Cain isn’t stupid. He knew he would get this but, unlike the others, he’s willing to put serious ideas on the table, rather than focusing on being “safe”.

  • timkellogg

    that he talks about Texas so much. I just get bored with it, just as I get bored with hearing how he’s going to do what all the others have also said they’d do, getting the oil industry rolling again. It makes sense, but he trumpets it like it’s his idea, I guess just because oil is so big in Texas (which will bring him Bush-like criticism of how he’s “rewarding his Texas oil buddies”), when EVERY candidate has proposed the same action at one time or another, and repeats it like it’s all he has to say. Herman gets overboard with 9-9-9 being the solution to everything (though he’s also said the same things as Perry and all the others about energy policy), but he does say enough otherwise to give folks a clear view of the kind of guy he is (this matters a lot), while Perry makes me think, “sure, oil, but what else?”
    What bugs me about Perry is, he’s not good at being phony like Romney, so it would be really nice if he could learn how to be REAL like Cain. If you say all the right things but sound like you made a half-a$$ed attempt to memorize them, rather than saying them from your own mind, you make me not trust you much. The occasional stumble isn’t so bad (Bush could be almost endearingly goofy with his version of English), but being unable to really say anything under pressure won’t cut it.