« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Commending the Perry Campaign

I risk being accused of endorsing Rick Perry by saying nice things about his campaign two days in a row, but this is genuinely worth commenting on and is not an endorsement.

Yesterday, I wrote a post that started with Perry as one of the best candidates to beat Barack Obama, but commented on what I perceive to be one of the flaws in his campaign. I wrote, “Of all the candidates running, I think he has one of the best shots, though his internal campaign situation has badly served him and he never should have left Ray Sullivan in his position.”

My issue with Ray Sullivan is not personal, nor (as some have speculated) does it derive from his wife assisting the Romney campaign. He is the communications director and, having worked both inside and outside campaigns, it has struck me that the Perry campaign’s messaging is erratic — much improved, but still erratic.

But I have to tip my hat to Ray Sullivan and the Perry campaign. Despite my criticisms of Ray, he sent out my post yesterday from the Perry campaign leaving my criticisms intact.

An amateur campaign does not do that. It takes a lot of testicular fortitude to be willing to do that as a candidate and as a communications shop within a campaign.

This is precisely why I think Iowans and others would be out of their minds if they did not take a look again at Rick Perry before settling. After the Michigan debate disaster, Perry has retooled, refocused, and executed a very solid game plan. Rick Perry has finally found his voice and Iowa tracking polls suggest the voters there like what they are hearing.

His conservative populism on the economy and Wall Street is pitch perfect. His message on values connects with voters in Iowa in a way few others do. He has finally hit his stride.

Perry should never have gone into the debates as early as he did. But I say that with 20/20 hindsight that he should have spent a month on the trail doing retail first. It seems clear to me he had a lack of preparation and serious back pain issues, which he is only now becoming comfortable telling the truth about.

The campaign has found its voice, found its stride, and has the strength to send out someone else’s writing that contains staff level criticisms. Again, few campaigns would be willing to do that.

I don’t know whether Rick Perry can get into the top three in Iowa. It may be too late. But I think with Gingrich’s collapse, the rise of Ron Paul, and a Rick Santorum candidacy that has never been vetted (Arlen Specter anyone?), Perry remains perhaps the only candidate who can take on both Mitt Romney in a primary and Barack Obama in a general election.

A veteran, a farmer, and a solid job creator who has never lost an election — I think he deserves another look before we look elsewhere for the Not Romney candidate who can beat Obama.

If you don’t like what you see, that’s fine by me. It’s the second look that matters.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    It does indeed take cajones to pass along material that includes personal staff criticisms. It’s nice to see that–only tough people are thick-skinned enough to look over personal faults in the interests of being fair and just.

  • beric

    It’s just the negative campaigning (which he refuses to participate in) which is having a short-term impact. He’s still roughly equal with Romney, and not going to drop much further. And he’s still go up if he wins SC.

    However, not missing your point, Perry, is definitely doing much better as of late. Though I don’t like the negative campaigning and the still mediocre debate performances. He and Newt need to do a Lincoln-Douglas debate on something, just anything.

  • tngal

    Perry needs to learn to be a better extemporaneous speaker. He may be a great guy but the man can’t remember important things. The debates and the stumping are about promoting your ideas and your proposals. But Perry can’t remember them.

    Yesterday he forgot HIS OWN tax plan. He was stumping in Iowa, and, according to Fox:
    ______
    “… Perry forgot about the about the standard deduction he built into his own flat tax plan, saying it would be gone.

    Jindal quickly chimed in to correct him. “You actually keep the standard deduction in your flat tax,” said the popular Bayou State Republican.

    “Oh that’s right, as a matter of fact we raise it to $12,500, uh, per family I think,” Perry replied. “Thank you for correcting me on that governor… not that I ever make a mistake.”
    _______________

    First he forgets the deduction, then he “thinks” he raised it to $12,500 per family?

    When a candidate gets on stage and lays out a plan to dump 3 agencies, but forgets one of them…then promotes his tax plan and forgets a key part- it doesn’t help him. I’m not sure that Jindal correcting him made it better, it just drew attention to the matter. The audience might not have known about it. But Perry has to learn his own stuff inside and out, so he can speak it in his sleep.

    And its not just his own ideas he has trouble with..A couple of weeks ago he was talking to an Iowa newspaper and forgot how many supreme court judges there are! And don’t look for 18-20 year olds to vote for him, since he thinks you have to be 21 to vote.

    He simply cannot speak off the cuff.

    http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/12/20/jindal-corrects-perry-candidates-own-tax-plan

  • circlegranch

    simply because of EE’s arguments here. He’s just now hitting his stride and its the retail politics that catch on fire. After 5 years, Romney still cannot make that connection with voters. He’s visibly uncomfortable with common people and they feel his distance. One couple I communicate with in SC saw Romney in person a few days ago and they walked away feeling as if they should have worn nicer clothes to the rally. Mitt Romney does not strike a cord with the common person.

    IA has the potential to come out of the barrel much the same way we’re going in, which is 3 or even 4 way ties for 3rd or 4th and candidates being separated by only a couple points. If Paul comes in first that only helps Perry because he’s stolen thunder from Newt Romney, yet he’ll soon implode creating daylight Perry can eventually fill. While the RNC is breathless for a final wrap-up at the end of January (which is why all the shuffle board was played in order to move primaries up—hurry and get Romney the nomination before the rest of the field can gain traction and before voters realize he’s as flawed as the next guy).

    Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich both appear to have something in common: neither has a fire in the belly passion. Paul shrugs his shoulders as if to say if he wins o.k., if not, too bad for you, America. But either way, he’s alright with it. He doesn’t want to fight for America, he’s ready to sit on the porch and play with his grandkids which would be a very good idea for him. Newt is having fun. He’s a narcissist at heart and enjoys the attention, even the negative. No matter how he finishes, he wins. If he becomes president, that would be cool. If he becomes vice president, that works and if he’s done by Super Tuesday, think of the books he can write and speeches he can give the rest of his life talking about his experiences. He can continue to wax eloquently about what should be done and always leave America with that sense of “what might have been”. It’s a win-win for Newt no matter the outcome.

    Santorum needs and wants another job which is helping fuel his passion. Bachmann wants to be in charge and tell everybody what to do and her voice is often smacked down in the House so going to the head of the line and becoming the biggest voice in the country seems a good strategy. She will tire of hearing herself espouse righteous indignation toward everyone around her. She believes in herself to an enormous degree which is why she promised women to ‘hold on’ till she’s elected and then she’ll save them from foreclosure.

    Rick Perry has been clear in that he never grew up dreaming of being president. His life story is one of humble service. He truly cares about people. I have contacts in IA and more than once I’ve gotten emails of him bringing audiences to tears with his stark honesty and sincere concern and worry about where the country is headed. He connects with common people because he’s been where common people are. Rally-goer’s tell me he’s alot more interested in hearing THEM talk and tell him their story than the opposite. He knows that the average family has spent thousands more in the past 3 years just for gas to get to work and how much that hurts. It’s money they can’t spend elsewhere or more importantly, save. He gets it. He gets us. He knows what needs to be done.

    Is America ready for a common sense, practical president that isn’t popular with the insider elites in the GOP? Are we ready for a president that has a wealth of one-liners laying in wait for the liberal media? Can we take a chance on a guy that will surround himself with top notch, experienced people that have the same belief system: America can be great again but we have to be willing to cut, cap and balance our way out of this mess and it will take commitment from all of us? Do we have the backbone and resolve to stand with a president that could not care less about being popular with the old hardliners of the GOP and probably would like to redefine the GOP as the Grand Old People rather than Party? Are we ready for tough talk with enemy nations followed by the cutting off of aid and comfort? Are we ready for a president that doesn’t get up everyday knowing the problems at hand and what needs to be done, but being guided first and foremost by political correctness, polls and the unending desire to be re-elected?

    Are we ready to stare down our Valley Forge moment; can we stand out there in the snow with rags for shoes and uphold each other till the end? Do we have the guts to relive the courage it took to bail off those boats on the beaches of Normandy? I had an uncle that was killed at the Battle of the Bulge. The reason he probably suffered a mortal wound was his inability to run. His feet had become frostbitten days before and although they were turning black, his buddies said he didn’t want anybody to know because he knew he’d be sent back from the front lines. He wanted to stay and fight till the end, which he did. He was 20 years old.

    Hard times are ahead, no way around it. We’ve elected people decade after decade that have buried us in a swamp. Are we ready to try something radically different or do we place our bets again on another hand-picked, entitled Republican that has a wishy washy background in terms of conservative leadership and values? He’s not known for cheating on his wife but he’s got a long and storied past of cheating on conservatism. Is that what we need now?

    Time’s running short. You make the call but please do so with the knowledge that if you get it wrong, the country falls apart. If we get this right, it will be morning again in America.

    Final thought: To those here that attack EE and accuse him of one thing or another, remember RS is his house. Without this forum, alot of very relevant, important political discourse would not be exchanged. Don’t like the content? The Huffington Post is always looking to expand their readership.

  • romansdaughter

    nt

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    I would like to hear Perry articulate his vision in a longer format, and I think that more time would allow him to do so well, and also providing him with the sort of positive material that could easily become more fantastic campaign advertisements. Now, Newt has debated both Cain and Huntsman in the L-D format, why not Perry?

  • circlegranch

    where they misspeak, misquote and otherwise just forget their trains of thought. Consider their schedules, the lack of sleep. When I get tired I can’t keep my grandkids’ names straight. It’s called being human, not being stupid.

  • circlegranch

    www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/romneys_problem_with_main_street.html

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …and started blogging elsewhere…
    http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2011/12/19/393640/#idc-cover
    …and noted this hyperlink…
    http://texas.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/07/texas-leadership-fails-texans/
    …which invites responses.

    This was one reaction: “That “article” is bunk. Perry put the TSA groping bill on the special session call. Blaming Perry for something David Dewhurst killed is asinine.”

    Others have composed additional attacks that may be worthy of rejoinders, recognizing that many have already been debunked @ RS; whatever appears “fresh” will then be transferred back to BigGovernment.

    Consider this attack [by siredecoucy] which is effectively countered by noting, for example, that Gore was the conservative-D in 1988: ?BigPerry.com is at it again. When Perry was Al Gores campaign manager in Texas he realized that so many Texans vote straight ticket GOP that trying to win as a Democrat is not possible. What Perry has done is built large numbers of Toll roads in areas that didn’t have any major highways. This made mostly agricultural land valuable to his developer buddies. Their land would be worthless without a major highway. Of course he had to use eminent domain to take a lot of other peoples land to do so. When we had a Constitutional amendment restricting Texas from taking peoples land he made sure the phase “except for roads” was in it. What is the term I have seen many time in these pages? Crony Capitalism? That is Perry Big Time.?

  • tngal

    and this improves Perry’s memory how?

  • bzip

    I truly admire Perry and his Team. Think about it, Perry and team Perry faces up to their mistakes and issues. The Opps moment is another prime example of the willingness to own up to and face the problems. They don’t try and hide or make excuses, they take a leadership role in the way they handle these issues.

    I think there is a very good chance that Perry will place in the top 3 in Iowa. I think its a given whether we like it or not that Ron Paul will be in the top 2. Then we have Romney and Newt. My guess is Romney will also finish in the top 3. I seriously doubt Newt is going to do as well as some would like, most likely not in the top 3. Newt’s numbers are seriously trending downward. Newt doesn’t have the ground game, the infrastructure and people to be competitive in Iowa’s caucuses. The only problem I see is will Bachmann be a spoiler for Perry.

    My guess is by the time we get to SC this will be a 4 person race: Romney, Perry, Newt and Paul.
    The question will be do we want a big gov’t candidate like Newt or a moderate like Romney, or a true limited gov’t conservative like Perry? Who will prevail?

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …so that renewed confidence in Perry can emerge.

    I have summarized a lot of the information [during the past four hours] on page #3 [for a quick-read], having covered most of page 1 and all of page 3, thus far.

    This appears to be a wonderful site [hosted by Breitbart, remember] that’s worthy of attention.

    I asked Pamela Geller [and e-mailed back-and-forth with Robert Spencer] regarding the Islamic-Education issue; she claims she was contacted by a parent whose child had been exposed to the course. I consider her to be an honest-broker, generically, so I prefer to leave it alone until direct conversation with Perry can be accomplished [to clarify what happened almost a decade ago].

    *

    Back to the attacks [by Eileen for Freedom]:

    Perry is behind the NAFTA Super Highway from Mexico to Canada?a prelude to the North American Union and vision of the Bilderberg towards their NWO! How much land of ?real? Americans do you think they are going to confiscate under ?eminent domain? to build this destroyer of nations?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6Z0eCz0pF4&fe…

    Here are some links giving the facts on his Super Highway from a variety of sources?

    Conservative Site 11/03/06 = http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=17868

    Lou Dobbs/CNN = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vda1KRF75M

    Also: http://engr101.com/2011/03/29/invasion-usa-part-1-nafta-superhighway-trans-texas-corridor-resurrected-in-hb-3789/

    And another spate of references was provided [which hasn't been tracked, but which appear after the "replies" button below the opening-salvo is double-clicked]:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wmtZehfBCM&fe…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6Z0eCz0pF4&fe…
    http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/obama_bilde…
    http://afgen.com/trilateral.html
    http://www.michaeljournal.org/bilder.htm
    http://www.alternativeright.com/main/the-magazine…

    And she added “Part II” thusly:

    2007 Executive Order on Gardasil bypassing the legislature of Texas?
    http://www.pharmalot.com/2011/08/rick-perry-and-t…

    Bilderberg Perry wanted to get into bed with Mexico?the unsecured border to the south?on healthcare long before Obamacare?

    http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/09/02/huh-g…

    A great article by Pam Geller?who knows Islam inside and out?and how Bilderberg Perry is tied to radical Islam?just like the Islamic sympathizer we have now!

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/perrys_pro…

    A VOTE FOR BILDERBERG PERRY PROVES THAT AMERICANS ARE FOOLISH IN VOTING WITH THEIR EMOTIONS AND NOT THE FACTS.

    *

    Here is a reply [by Kermit_H]:

    You like others have apparently swallowed the hook, line and sinker. All the campaigns AGAINST the TTC were funded by California Dock Worker Unions, Warren Buffett & George Soros.

    Here is the deal, the Panama Canal is about to be able to take the largest containerships. Brownsville, TX was to be the site of a super container terminal. All those $100+ per hour jobs getting paid 8 hrs daily for 4 hrs work, all of those ‘mini land bridge” trains to Cali for Buffetts BN Railroad, were going to lose a ton of money.

    Buffett is the one behind funding envirowhacks against the Keystone XL, to keep oil on his tank cars. Geller absolutely lied and possibly also fed bad info. She even has not considered her own article from the Fall of 2010 regarding the governing body of the Texas public school system and how it. She also lied about Aga Khan and the Ismaili sect of which he is head on funding terrorist.

    Geller supposedly had “the goods” on Perry because one of the most liberal INDEPENDENT school districts out of more than 1000 in Texas. From a school district which is the 3rd largest in San Antonio and where Obama won 70% of the vote in 2008. I know of other school districts in Texas where none of this could be found, including from one where a now former board member (who is personal friends with Netanyahu) cried foul about Geller’s LIE!

    Geller made a lot of that crap up. That has been totally debunked by Center for Security Policy and a number of others. I would explain how the 1000+ INDEPENDENT School Districts in Texas operate and the Texas State School System, but you believe a liar.

    BTW, since all the b.s. reporting about the Macondo Spill over a year ago, I find that anyone with a moniker including “patriot” or “freedom” or similar, is usually not very bright.

    *

    Here is another reply by Maribeth92:

    When the people protested against the TTC, Rick Perry killed it. And I mean KILLED it. It cannot, by Texas law, be revived.

    Please read this article: “Eyewitness Account of How Rick Perry Killed the Trans-Texas Corridor” (http://rickperryreport.com/faq/trans-texas-corridor/eyewitness-account-how-rick-perry-killed-trans-texas-corridor). This story is an amazing testimony of Perry’s willingness to concede to his constituents.

    And as far as the Bilderbergs go…

    “Perry’s detractors want us to believe that he hass been studying his Bilderberg bible, taking classes in New World Governing, and polishing his Illuminati lapel pin. And it also means that the Bilderbergers are ready to dump President Obama, who Helicopter Conservatives allege the Bilderberg Group put in office in 2008, in favor of Rick Perry in 2012? . . . Only in science fiction (and conspiracy theories) can someone like Rick Perry be turned into a mind-numbed robot following the Bilderberg?s nefarious instructions to take over the world ? instructions that they somehow implanted in less than three days ? four years ago ? right.” (http://rickperryreport.com/faq/rick-perry-and-bilderberg-conspiracy)

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    “Newt lost his when his GOP colleagues rejected him. He was given an unprecedented opportunity to reform entitlements and reverse our nation?s fiscal rot and?he blinked.”

    I don’t understand how his time as speaker shows “he blinked”. The 84 charges were filed before he became Speaker. He was cleared of all of them except two (one regarding his class and one regarding his mis-statement). Then the IRS cleared the one regarding his class.

    Yes, the investigation process was dragged-out forever (3 years). It was also politicized and used to influence the 1998 elections. However, its not like Newt was given power and then went on a wild binge. He was immediately attacked upon being given the position of Speaker and was forced to defend himself.

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/06/surprise-gingrich-ethics-files-are-public-info/

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/gingrich/report/part_i.htm

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    Regarding debates, it is opined [by mickigal]: ?Debates may not be important, but Perry against Obama will seal Perry’s doom.? This overall issue has been covered, but Rick?s comment [?I?m getting to like them so much that, when going against BHO, I?ll arrive early!?] reflects overall improvement. He need only talk of Jobs/Federalism/Iran and he?s golden.

    Regarding ?W? [per poquimoqui]: ?Perry = Bush III. Unfortunately he reminds too many Americans of those dark years. The Texas drawl, the bumbling speech, the deep love towards illegals, etc. Perry has as much chance at getting elected as I do.? This is countered by noting Perry?s observation that ?W? has Yale-based roots.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    The hyperlinks [from Washington76] to Michele?s support for the Patriot Act [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mos0blynBiI&feature=digest] is desirable [in my view], the hyperlink to the SWAT-team handling of a Marine [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR0d-85PEcI&feature=youtu.be] appears tangential, and the investigation of a teenager?s facebook entry [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqSFbWtB_44&feature=related] appears novel, but not determinative. He is obviously finding this intrusion to be problematic, but the evidence is scant when contrasted with the threat. This captures my reaction [by dshevlin]: ?O.K. I am familiar with the first one and will look at the rest later, but first I must tell you this: She did the right thing. This was a tough decision to make but it is necessary. I am a former DHS officer. Please listen to me as I love my country and I am a conservative. If not for the Patriot Act we might all be living Sharia Law right now. We have an enemy that has not given up since 9/11. Every single day there is something found, the public just does not hear about it. When the media reports something it has become defused already OR it was so big that everyone saw it so it gets reported, but on a daily basis our Islamist enemies are trying to infiltrate us. The reason the public does not realize how huge this threat is, is because of the excellent job of all our law enforcement agencies. They need these amendments to our laws to fight back and protect our homeland. It is because of our way of life that we have become vulnerable. Liberalism has been the tool that they are using against us. They will take advantage of our freedoms to kill us if we do not protect ourselves. It is unfortunate but it is reality. Michele explains quite well why she cast her yes vote and if the leaders are good people we will not have to worry about the abuse of power. I can only use Israel as an example as they are the best in the world for security and they too are trying to be free like America. Their people understand and their government is cool. I have seen things you guys will never know about and I see that this is needed. I understand why you all are getting worried, with the current admin. in place YES, this will be abused. There is current legislation out there now that states the feds can detain anyone without due cause or trial, now that one is dangerous and too extreme. Obama is a Muslim Marxist, they have already infiltrated our government through him. To win back our constitutional republic we are going to have to sacrifice something. Nothing worth having is ever achieved without some kind of sacrifice. What that video of Michelle tells me is she is smart and she has guts and they are trying to make you think otherwise so she does not win, they do not want her because she is good. I like her more than ever now, you should too. Any other candidate including the incumbent tells you that this yes vote is wrong they are lying to you. Please trust me on this one. Keep in touch! God Bless America and all of you for sharing information and fighting the good fight.?

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    ?Perry pretty clear, boots on the ground at the border and strategic fence to secure the border. Then let American ppl decide what to do w/ illegals that are here. He has said this again and again. Did you see what happen w/ Brewer in AZ. No stopping Illegals while Obama in office?. I think too many ppl look at one side of the issue and don’t see the big problem. The federal government mandates these illegals be given an education and medical. The governors of all border-states? hands are tied. They have to deal w/ it like it or not. Perry has said securing border w/ boots on ground and a strategic fence priority. Pretty sound advice. If you think Newt, Romney, Bachmann, or Paul could do any better than vote for em. Perry is the one I’m betting on to get the job done? I think you are preaching to the choir. Maybe you need to address your concerns with Obama and the federal government as they seem to be the biggest road block to stopping illegals from coming into this country. Not Rick Perry! Border security is the federal governments Job and they are failing badly?.Most ppl just want a way to stop them from coming over. Perry has a plan whether you agree w/ plan is your right. Thank God we still have a right. Perry message of states? rights and limiting federal gov is something I support.? [votemout2012]

    ?Perry is also an advocate for quasi-Amnesty of Illegals currently in the USA, and the continuation of the current Anchor Baby Policy. Both stumbling blocks for a would-be Conservative.? [EOD] Not so. He wishes not to focus on those who are here until the borders have been secured and existing law has been upheld. [In my view, creating overseas ?Ellis Island? entities would facilitate return, for people would START @ the back-of-the-line and then be able to show links that would allow them to be prioritized; prior work experience would then yield the equivalent of a visiting-visa to continue providing it. And minors who entered illegally would not be penalized for what their parents had done. Finally, he would use e-verify AFTER its credibility has been verified. Calling for a constitutional amendment to change #14 would be difficult to ?sell? to Americans, currently.]

  • renl57

    …he needs to come clean about it, before the New York Times finds out about it.

    I had major surgery myself this past year, and I was on painkillers so strong that I couldn’t even remember my own home telephone number.

    Perry had major surgery earlier this year, and I’m wondering if that’s why his memory seems to be failing at times.

  • daemonocracy

    http://www.damndirtyrino.com/2011/12/10/a-gaffe-aint-a-gaffe/

    He didn’t forget the number of justices, his response was taken out of context.

    As for the tax plan flub, I have not heard of it, but no need for you to give false information to bolster your attack.

  • APA Guy

    If it is, you may as well take that free t-shirt and go home.

    Do you have any idea how much information these people are required to retain and produce on demand at any given moment? Not everyone is as fluid as Clinton or Gingrich.

    Take that schnit somewhere else and come back when you have less petty criticisms.

  • APA Guy

    If it is, you may as well take that free t-shirt and go home.

    Do you have any idea how much information these people are required to retain and produce on demand at any given moment? Not everyone is as fluid as Clinton or Gingrich.

    Take that schnit somewhere else and come back when you have less petty criticisms.

  • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

    That altercation between Eileen for Freedom and Maribeth92…that was ME and Eileen. Wasn’t she awful? I finally had to walk away, she was so nasty and irrational. There are some people you can’t convince no matter why you say. And when someone calls you names…well, just goes to show you have mature they are. Anyway, I got a good laugh over that…Big government does seem like a good site. I noticed one comment accusing the mods of having BigRickGovernment.com, so RedState isn’t the only website accused of being sold out for Perry.

    Thanks for this article, Erick, and big kudos to Ray Sullivan. That was a gutsy move.

  • romansdaughter

    I remember when people were pointing out gaffe after gaffe with Cain and how you still thought he was a great candidate and of course you are entitled to your opinion and who you want to support but it seems a little hypocritical of you to then when Cain isn’t in the race anymore to suddenly start harping on another candidates gaffes. Who are you supporting now?? Newt??

  • circlegranch

    He will have little chance of meeting very many people in a week prior to the vote. Plus, the weather could be a huge factor. Its not impossible to contemplate that little travel could happen that week, especially on icy rural roads that are drifted shut. Newt (and Calista) are not troopers; if the weather’s bad, he’ll go back to conference calls.

    After IA, there has to be serious discussion between Bachmann/Perry/Santorum. They are all after the same voting block. Only one can prevail. If sound reasoning is applied, the one to emerge to go forth should be the candidate with money and proven, real-time record of jobs creation, balancing a budget and reducing taxes. The choice is clear. What Bachmann and Santorum also need to understand that they both have a far greater chance of an administrative appointment under President Perry than either Newt or Mitt. Mitt will honor those that endorsed him (this comes back to the original argument of whether or not Bachmann has been playing the Spoiler for Romney thing all along, securing the VP spot for herself). Romney may well, however, go with a Meg Whitman type or a more neutral Beltway Republican. It’s unlikely Romney would give Santorum the time of day for any appointment.

  • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

    to realize this, circlegranch. I worry they’re not. They’ve got to be realizing they have little chance of getting the nomination. I pray they recognize that before it’s too late and we have a disaster on our hands; it will be their fault if we get Romney as our nominee.

  • romansdaughter

    You write really interesting posts. I love it. How come you don’t write a diary on some of these subjects, it would be awesome !

  • josephine

    The clips on wsb radio this morning of Dec. 21st are suspiciously wrong. All of the national polls are showing Newt leading Romney and Paul by a long way. This is pure propaganda. Obama is not the only one who thinks the listeners are stupid.The people of this country are speaking-whether any of the media are reporting the truth.
    I have lost all confidence in any of you except Rush.
    You are included in this. Possibly it was taped 3 days ago, I just don’t know. It is all sensationalism, just ratings are important.
    I am so disappointed. Perry is just not going to get the nomination and I do not agree with your tactics of keeping him alive. You are fueling 0. Bachmann is a joke now and Paul is too. The libs have taken his numbers.
    Romney is a failure in everything but hedge funds. He will not beat Obama.
    I apologize, but I have just lost it with all of you. I am probably not the only one.
    WSB needs to take a close look at how they are turning away their listeners. I’m tuning into “oldies but goodies” turning all of you off.

  • 4suramcan

    You’ve got it right and maybe with posts like this others will begin to see the need for a man like Perry in the white house.

  • bobguzzardi

    There is a story that George Washington heard of the Chanukah story from a Jewish soldier at Valley Forge and when all seemed lost, he rallied. Although the war went on for five years, that was the moment when the end was seen.

    Chanukah means re-dedication to core values and principles in the face of a pagan enemy. America faces that same challenge: Will we return to the core of American Exceptionalism, Constitutional Limited Government, Rule of Law, Checks and Balances on Power, Free Markets and Economic Freedom, Personal Responsibility based on Judeo Christian principles. In my view, Rick Perry embodies and exudes American Exceptionalism at its best.

    We can look at each issue but to get tangled in the weeds of policy may cause us to overlook the goal.

    Rick Perry has governed and does govern and that requires Righteous Compromises; Texas is not a dictatorship; one cannot have his or her own way, purity in principle overlooks the inconsistencies and contradictions of real world.

    fyi I understand that Hanna and her sons are considered Christian saints and that there is a Feast of the Maccabees. This is amazing because these were Jews, not Christian. Chanukah occurred in 165 bce.

    Rick Perry is The Guy

  • josephine

    The delusional opinions that Perry will rise to prominence are just not going to come through.
    There is a lot of sensationalism going on out there to keep the competition for ratings up. I’m tired of it all.
    The SC and Fl caucuses look like they will boil down to Newt and Romney. Of which, Newt leads. He’s leading in the national polls today,even though all the media is lying to us by saying this and that and the other.Everyday Perry messes up. I like him. I like what he believes in. But he is not going to win.
    I think it’s time for these candidates and the news to take a realistic look at things. Bachmann is hoping for VP for Romney. I am really disappointed in her. Paul is a fool and Perry is just not a public figure.
    I suggest everybody read Newt’s website. Click on Solutions and go for it. Then read Obama’s and click on “Issues”. He has no solutions. Then click on Mitt’s. He just deflects.
    Get your own info. I’m not depending on any of the media anymore.

  • http://www.planettron.com NickDeringer

    We are reading between the lines and acknowledging that Erick is in the Perry camp. Glenn Beck has given his non-endorsement endorsement to Michele Bachmann. I don’t think she has a shot, but it’s more of a principle thing. Given the fact that we’ve had 5 front runners in under a year, it’s safe to say this is a weak field. But if there’s anybody who can go after One-bama and win it’s Perry. This election is about jobs, jobs, jobs and Perry has a solid record to point to.

    Perry/Rubio 2012 because we need to remind One-bama that he’s the worst president ever.

  • swamphermit

    My “Another Texas ‘Pretty Boy’” didn’t go over very well yesterday, so maybe the Texas Toast will do better.

    Pushing or “endorsing”? I think everyone knows RS has been promoting and pushing hard for Perry since he “announced his presidential bid at the RedState Gathering in South Carolina.”

    He’s had plenty of chances, and like his wife just said, they still have plenty of money…

  • bobguzzardi

    Is this really a good idea? encouraging dr. bob to write more. :-)

    dr. bob is my best friend and he is, truly, a genius as you can see.

    My contribution is to remind dr. bob we live in a real world and common sense and practical and interpersonal skills are is sometimes useful trait and, for many, the key to success.

    Combing dr. bob’s genius with common sense and practical execution results in effective plan and competent execution.

    dr. bob plans; there has to be some one to Bell the Cat.

    back to the point, the issue is not only Rick Perry’s position on issues but is ability to govern, to unite our country, to steer us away from entitled socialism before we hit the fiscal iceberg.

    The Titanic sank because the captain was dancing in the ballroom and failed to see the danger and failed to act.

    Rick Perry sees the danger and can govern.

    Who will best govern America? Rick Perry is The Guy.

  • myuncletom

    Did anyone reading this post see that Gov. Jindal had to correct Gov. Perry yesterday about his own tax plan? Is this who we really want running in the general. If you look at the CNN poll, this could be a long year for our side. #depressing

  • bobguzzardi

    I was on the phone with Romney operatives and it appears that Florida is pivotal and it appears that this will be a long campaign.

    My sense is that Rick Perry campaign is pacing itself for the marathon.

    Rick Perry has never lost an election and he defeated the Rove Bush Hutchinson machine and that takes some talent, skill and brains.

    Rick Perry is not to be underestimated.

    Rick Perry is The Guy

  • btpull

    nt

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    Anytime someone prematurely closes the field for Newt and Mitt (Newt is behind Ron Paul right now–he’d better start working to reverse that trend) gets this alert. It means you’re not thinking broadly enough for your own sake. Newt has great ideas, but can he be trusted to get them into law and to retain interest when there is trouble, or will he cut and run like he did in Congress in the face of adversity?

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    I’ll give you three guesses and the first two don’t count :D .

  • arthurmanger17

    Mr Erickson has not been endorsing Rick Perry since early summer when he declared Newt was done when his brilliant staff went to Perry. He wasn’t endorsing Perry when explained the bad debates performances. He’s not endorsing Perry when he put the blame for Perry’s poll numbers on his staff. He’s certainly not endorsing perry exclaiming how honest and noble Perry’s campaign staff is for taking criticism. And finally Rick has found his voice, hitting his stride, on message, shining. But none of that over all this time is an endorsement of Rick Perry by Erick Erickson. Fascinating!

  • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

    “Tim Tebow of Iowa” and “Secretariat” are the metaphors of the hour.

  • thirstyboots

    If not more. Heck, at least one NH poll showed him less popular than Obama…. amongst GOP voters! It’s basically impossible to achieve that sort of status, but he did it.

    Policy issues apart, Perry was always a terrible idea as a national candidate. He just doesn’t have the quick feet politicians of this era are required to have.

  • streiff

    Cain’s pet name for his penis was “the liberal media.”

  • josephine

    There are many many twisted and untrue mud like statements being thrown around about Newt. I know they are not correct. I have never been a Bachmann fan, and now she has done herself in. The media and the GOP Establishment has small respect for the people of this country. The Rove Group of the GOP is trying to get back to the WH. That’s all there is to it. And that article by Jeb Bush is straight off Rush’s website.
    If you will go to Wikipedia and read the article by Ward Cunningham(the creator of Wiki) you will get a pretty good look at Newt.
    For the conservatives (which I am one) you will see it was Newt that worked hand in hand with Reagan to get his policies through congress. It was the usual suspects(even in the 90′s) that revolted against his prowess and his power. It was Newt that reformed Welfare and Balanced the Budget 4 years in a row. He saved us then and he can save us now.
    If he has a couple of moderate ideas-it is because he is realistic and looking at the future. He is not a dictator and he follows the rules. He is a true American and has repented his past. Rove and his band of followers can not stand him as they know they will lose their hold on DC if he is elected.Don’t be fooled by any of the media.
    Even the “so called true media” is hiding his success. I believe they are under pressure from the owners to keep the sensationalism going. We are being used. Go to Newt’s and Romney’s and Obama’s websites and compare them. It is a shocker. You even have to join Obama’s group to read his “issues”.
    I created a “junk” email to sign in with.

  • bzip

    It is becoming clear many are worried about splitting the vote among the 3 top conservatives: Perry, Bachmann and Santorum. What gets me is neither Bachmann or Santorum have the funds/resources or even the ability to move much beyond Iowa – Perry is the only competitive person:

    Iowa evangelicals skeptical they can unite behind one candidate for caucuses
    http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/12/20/iowa-evangelicals-skeptical-they-can-unite-behind-one-candidate-for-caucuses/

    “Most of the evangelical devotion is split between Santorum, Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry, the leaders said, while Newt Gingrich and others have gained scattered support.

    Vander Plaats called Bachmann on Saturday to ask her to consider merging her campaign with another candidate?s, but didn?t suggest whether he thought she should be president or vice president, Bachmann spokeswoman Alice Stewart said.”

  • bzip

    Texas Gov. Rick Perry makes strong pitch for states? rights in Davenport speech
    http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/12/20/24455/

  • mkozikowski

    But you truly have to take what they say with a ‘grain of salt’.

    Lately, they are leaning way left of Conservative, almost to the absolute center. That is NOT what we need with this election.

    They are also, very decidedly resigned to a two man race of Romney and Gingrich.

    They talk of R. Paul as a kook 3rd, but definately talk down to all other contenders.

    Rick Perry is THE ONLY candidate that shows an absolute path to fixing our system, He is the ONLY candidate that has not wavered on his message or opinion. He is the ONLY candidate that is absolutely Conservative.

    Making an opinion based on information reported by Fox TV is a poor excuse for researched thought.

  • bzip

    Well you are entitled to your opinion but clearly a significant amount of voters disagree with you. Whether you like it or not Perry is a competitive candidate, surely far more competitive then: Bachmann, Santorum, Huntsman and as it stands now Newt is trending seriously down with high negatives.

    So in the end your opinion only matters to those who happen to agree with you and thankfully that isn’t as significant as you may want it to be.

  • romansdaughter

    rather vindictive and she was not happy that Rick Perry stole her lime light so quickly. I mean how else do you explain her irrational hitting on Rick Perry in all those first debates and then to find out she as Rep. had agreed to some of the very things that she was accusing Rick Perry of. I don’t think she will hang up her hat any time too soon, unless she runs out of money…which Mitt might help her out in. Now Rick Santorum might but I don’t know???

  • bzip

    Did anyone see and notice that Newt lied, lied to the public about supporting carbon cap mandates? Did anyone notice that Newt supports GSE’s and big gov’t intervention? Did anyone notice that Newt is arrogant and even to the point of telling voters to vote for Obama:

    Newt Gingrich to gay Iowan: Vote for Obama
    http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/12/20/gingrich-to-gay-iowan-vote-for-obama/

    Gingrich Criticized for Arrogance by Supporter, Says ABC News Comment Was a ?Mistake?
    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/gingrich-criticized-for-arrogance-by-supporter-says-abc-news-comment-was-a-mistake/

    Gingrich’s Alzheimer’s on carbon cap mandate
    http://youtu.be/NuPGlkpDqUw

    Happy (IA) – Restore Our Future (Newt Baggage)
    http://youtu.be/hjD_IFclRro

  • paco12348

    I’ve had several major surgeries and I can testify to the fact my memory was impaired for a period of time after each one. Anesthetic seems to treat each person differently. One little girl had waking nightmares. The dr. said her brain had retained small pockets of the anesthetic and when she would relax for sleep a pocket would open, thus the nightmares, even though she seemed to be awake.
    I understand the memory lapse, if that is Perry’s reason and I assume it must be since he’s been a successful governor with no problems. It will pass and he will be ok.

  • beach91

    here in W. Florida, nathanalbright, for the Perry man! No other candidate can compete with him in terms of experience, ideas and general conservatism. Hoping he does well in IA.

  • nancysabet

    …who shows the courage…what state created the environment for JOBS and what are our major problems – JOBS, healthcare, energy and over-regulation. Who has the plan to fix it…Governor Rick Perry. Just think about it. Give him another chance.

  • edintexas

    Newt is a wonderful debater, And if we had a Debater-in-Chief position, he would be perfect for it. But debate is one of a number of things in which a President is only involved during a campaign and has nothing to do with the duties of the office.

    I couldn’t care less about his marital history. We’ve had womanizers as President often in the 20th century. But his vote for the Clinton Crime Bill is unforgivable. Like Romney, he seems to have come late to a full appreciation of the Second Amendment (though not as late as Romney). His promoting an individual mandate, as an alternative to Hillarycare, is not a positive (even if Heritage mistakenly promoted it, and admitted it was a mistake years before Newt decided it was a mistake). And his later dabbling in encouraging government mandating the use of electronic medical records (with both government and private sector history of being unable to secure data systems) and other medical issues is not a plus for me. He is not a Conservative.

    We’ve had one other Professor as President within the past century. Woodrow Wilson also had big ideas. I’m not saying Newt would be like Wilson. But “big ideas” do not equate to a sure benefit to the Republic.

  • hls87

    He’s crashed, burning to follow. His problem doesn’t have much to do with negative campaigning against him. It has to do with all the material the negative campaigns have to work with. He’s a nonstarter.

    An ideolgically incoherent guy who never won a statewide elecion, hasn’t held a position of public trust in the last decade, got booted from his last post by a conservaive revolt, spent the last thirteen years as a shameless Washington influence peddler and has been married three times, most recently to a former staffer young enough o be his daughter has precisely zero chance of winning a major party nomination, let alone a general election. Newt’s surge is a mirage, a fanasy. It will dissolve as soon as Iowa caucuses. Newt boosting is a waste of time.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …he is a statist/elitist.

    He may have other redeeming qualities [including his stance on the Arab-Israeli conflict], but he has really done-himself-in on this subpoena-the-judges posture; it’s so unnecessary, and it reflects such extreme arrogance that he would even twist American history so as to conjure precedents for what is obviously over-the-edge.

  • ctredstater

    Nixon made the point in several of his excellent books that “political destiny is won in fighting for close elections”. Reagan’s career was on the ropes in 1976 and he had a big comeback win in North Carolina, which set him on the path to continue to challenge Ford right to the convention, setting up his 1980 win.

    I have been a supporter of Governor Perry as the nominee since many months before he got into the race. A lot of these posts are excellent – and point out that the nominating landscape will look different starting in SC and beyond. If Governor Perry is “still standing” come then, the dynamic will be completely different.

    I hope and pray he makes the connections with Iowans to give him the best possible bump going into 2012.

  • geah

    my ancestors were with George, at Forge, and this is true, and also the comment by Cricle ,plus this one is the finest ones I have seen on and for Perry, I had 5 children and they threatened to place name tags on themselves so I would stop calling Tim by his sisters name I really do understand Perry.

  • geoph

    But my state doesn’t vote until things are fairly settled (usually).

    I agree about FOX News and have been flipping on the Christmas Music Station when a lot of their panel “debates” come on. I’ve stopped watching from noon to two all together, as Mr. Colmes was popping up way to often then.

    But the crux of my post is, what is Perry’s “total plan”?
    Please don’t just post a link, I could find that.
    I really am interested in knowing how his supporters interpret his platform. THAT tells me the most about a candidate.

  • reggie182

    Where is the footage of Gingrich telling this man to vote for Obama? I haven’t seen any. I guess it would be impossible for him to make up such a story.I suppose it doesn’t matter though. Newt’s name isn’t “Rick Perry”, and that’s damning enough.

  • reggie182

    Where is the footage of Gingrich telling this man to vote for Obama? I haven’t seen any. I guess it would be impossible for him to make up such a story.I suppose it doesn’t matter though. Newt’s name isn’t “Rick Perry”, and that’s damning enough.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    All kidding aside, I have manifest a few goals, here, that are worthy of probing.

    First, it is clear that EE would “like to like” Perry, but respect [even in this gigantic context] must be “earned” [as in "earned media"].

    Second, I provided this recapitulation of many ideas because I wanted to be demonstrative about the contents @ BigGovernment…so that we all can create a comfort-level participating therein; there are new people [who are smart] awaiting the education that only we can provide!

    Third, it seems I wasn’t alone, noting how I stumbled upon another nom-de-plume of our own Louisiana-patriette [a.k.a. Maribeth92].

    Fourth, this exercise opened-up Josephine, who now has to confront her affections with “real politic.”

    Fifth, I await the addition of “Diary” to my tool-bar; I keep thinking my job’s done, and then a new dimension of blogging appears.

    Sixth, you should all rest reassured that Guzzardi [whom I invited to RS] watches over me; during Hanukkah-Dinner last night, we exchanged-notes [and fenced with my son, as my brother sat bemused]…and we are super-charged for upcoming events.

    Seventh, it is difficult to “rest” under such extraordinary conditions; I confess to have become a [temporary] couch-potato.

    Eighth, I will now cross-ruff info here onto BigGovernment; Breitbart wasn’t particularly impressed with Perry a fortnight ago [when we chatted @ the Union League in Philly], but this editorial represents a significant sequella.

    Ninth, I haven’t finished “digesting” page 2 [#1 and #3 were done, prior to my nap], and I’ll visit BG to assess the reaction prior to completing this task; it seems [after having perusing the comments without opening the replies] that there is a lot of redundancy in this grouping, but I’ll attempt to milk-out the key-content, if for no other reason than to “inform” readers of both sites.

    Tenth, remember, I reviewed almost 300 postings in one swallow, so know that I may have inadvertently missed something crucial, but I tried to capture everything with hyperlinked-references.

    *

  • hls87

    His poll numbers still look competitive. It won’t last. The Titanic looked fine for a while after the iceberg ripped its guts out. Cain coasted at the top of the field for a couple of weeks after his campaign was clearly over. Gingrich, like Cain before him, is dead man walking. He isn’t what the primary electorate is shopping for and, as voters give serious consideration to their choice that will become clear to them. In the end, very few will cast a ballot for Newt.

    Polls don’t make a serious presidential candidate. Debates don’t make a serious presidential candidate. A serious presidential candidate is years, even decades in the making. To compete in the presidential game you have to be a major political player with a recent record of big-time electoral success when the game starts. Members of the House, including Speakers, don’t count. Neither does anyone whose political career ended more than a decade ago.

    Newt isn’t really a presidential candidate, he just plays one on TV.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …again, please stop negative mind-reading.

    I wrote a few weeks ago [and episodically thereafter] that Michele survived an eyeball-to-eyeball-to-eyeball-to-eyeball chat with me, a month ago, and she is SINCERE. She may appear to have kissed-up to Mitt, but she has stopped with the Gardisil-stuff [I purposefully didn't tell her of my Expert Review of the literature, for there were other issues to discuss, a day after the Family-Thanksgiving Confessional.] She is exposing The Newt and, perhaps, this is why you act as you do.

    Noting volatility as the norm, it’s also “delusional” to accuse anyone else of being “delusional” when attempting to sketch potential electoral pathways. Lament to your heart’s content about the MSM/LSM/ELM’s antics, but know that you are always invited to exit a kitchen-debate that you might feel is too hot/heated.

    A friend wrote [endearingly] a few days ago that she detests the coach of the Philadelphia Eagles because “Andy Reid makes me want to vomit and then vomit again.” I have a comparable reaction when I read: “Perry is just not a public figure.”

    *

  • tracker

    “Gingrich: Well, if that’s most important to you then you should be for Obama. ”

    http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/12/21/gingrich-tells-gay-marriage-supporter-not-vote-him#ixzz1hBIU5k9Z

  • WA_Cowboy

    You did well. and she proved herself to be an irrational tool.

  • texasroots

    I wonder how the other candidates would be after traveling on the bus doing four grueling events. I saw Perry last night at 6:30 pm in his last stop in Davenport (the 4th stop), and he did great. He was flawless. Perry is not a robot. I love his retailing campaigning. The media is blacking out Perry, but he is getting the local media’s attention which is more positive than the national. Brilliant. Go, Perry, go!

  • lizzie

    Here is the Sunday coverage of the Perry and Bachmann Iowa bus tours (in a different DMRegister article, political pundits question why Bachmann is going for all 99 counties in ten days, while Perry is more strategically targetting population centers)

    Sunday, stop by stop, background, staff (and, Bachmann quoted about MTPress’ David Gregory ?He?s a little snot sometimes.? which shows a mean pettiness of spirit that I did not expect

    http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20111220/NEWS09/312200047
    Really interesting coverage, but this item REALLY spoke volumes about Rick Perry’s private, quiet, deep connection with all of us

    Sunday, Dec. 18, 2011, 12:26 p.m.:
    “SCENE, PERRY: At Dave?s Restaurant in Charles City, Perry falls deep in conversation with Kathy and George Tumilson, who rode over with him on the bus from First Wesleyan Church. Although not introduced to the rest of the crowd, the Tumilsons are well-known to many Iowans: They?re the parents of Jon Tumilson, the Rockford native and Navy SEAL who was among 30 Americans killed Aug. 30 when enemy forces in Afghanistan shot down a Chinook helicopter. (It was Tumilson?s faithful dog, Hawkeye, who was famously pictured at the foot of his casket.) Kathy Tumilson tells a reporter her son was friends with several Texans. When Perry learned that back in September, he proclaimed the SEAL an ?honorary citizen? of Texas and sent a proclamation that his parents received the day after their son?s funeral. ?He?s just a man I admire,? Tumilson says of Perry.”

    While I wish Perry’s campaign website had better coverage of his Iowa bus tour – they have not yet posted the video of the GAFFE-FREE livestream from Waterloo last night – I think the word-of-mouth in Iowa is going to make for a very interesting caucus result.

    Thanks for this excellent comment:
    “Perry could use a strong finish in IA but if not, I think he’s still o.k.
    circlegranch Wednesday, December 21st at 6:04AM EST”

    As to the point of Erick’s post? Well, I get the daily news email from Perry2012, and they also include in-depth articles from the NYT that have been both negative and positive, like the NYT article about Perry and the Texas judicial system – negative on death penalty cases, but admitting a lot of serious reform in improving legal rights of the accused.

    btw, today, in New Hampshire, Jon Huntsman is doing a conference call takedown of Romney’s job-killing record from Bain.

    oh, and lapatriette: I still think “Secretariat” is the #2 symbol for Perry. “Hidalgo” is #1 because Hidalgo was a wild mustang (and a very smart horse) who beat all the Arabian thoroughbreds.

    Plus, I always love the moment in “Hidalgo” when Frank Hopkins lassoes the release for the killer-trap for the treacherous Bedouin with the line “No one hurts my horse”.
    Up there with the moment in “Shooter” where Mark Wahlberg’s character has a similar scene because the villain killed his dog…

  • lizzie

    Here is the Sunday coverage of the Perry and Bachmann Iowa bus tours (in a different DMRegister article, political pundits question why Bachmann is going for all 99 counties in ten days, while Perry is more strategically targetting population centers)

    Sunday, stop by stop, background, staff (and, Bachmann quoted about MTPress’ David Gregory ?He?s a little snot sometimes.? which shows a mean pettiness of spirit that I did not expect

    http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20111220/NEWS09/312200047
    Really interesting coverage, but this item REALLY spoke volumes about Rick Perry’s private, quiet, deep connection with all of us

    Sunday, Dec. 18, 2011, 12:26 p.m.:
    “SCENE, PERRY: At Dave?s Restaurant in Charles City, Perry falls deep in conversation with Kathy and George Tumilson, who rode over with him on the bus from First Wesleyan Church. Although not introduced to the rest of the crowd, the Tumilsons are well-known to many Iowans: They?re the parents of Jon Tumilson, the Rockford native and Navy SEAL who was among 30 Americans killed Aug. 30 when enemy forces in Afghanistan shot down a Chinook helicopter. (It was Tumilson?s faithful dog, Hawkeye, who was famously pictured at the foot of his casket.) Kathy Tumilson tells a reporter her son was friends with several Texans. When Perry learned that back in September, he proclaimed the SEAL an ?honorary citizen? of Texas and sent a proclamation that his parents received the day after their son?s funeral. ?He?s just a man I admire,? Tumilson says of Perry.”

    While I wish Perry’s campaign website had better coverage of his Iowa bus tour – they have not yet posted the video of the GAFFE-FREE livestream from Waterloo last night – I think the word-of-mouth in Iowa is going to make for a very interesting caucus result.

    Thanks for this excellent comment:
    “Perry could use a strong finish in IA but if not, I think he’s still o.k.
    circlegranch Wednesday, December 21st at 6:04AM EST”

    As to the point of Erick’s post? Well, I get the daily news email from Perry2012, and they also include in-depth articles from the NYT that have been both negative and positive, like the NYT article about Perry and the Texas judicial system – negative on death penalty cases, but admitting a lot of serious reform in improving legal rights of the accused.

    btw, today, in New Hampshire, Jon Huntsman is doing a conference call takedown of Romney’s job-killing record from Bain.

    oh, and lapatriette: I still think “Secretariat” is the #2 symbol for Perry. “Hidalgo” is #1 because Hidalgo was a wild mustang (and a very smart horse) who beat all the Arabian thoroughbreds.

    Plus, I always love the moment in “Hidalgo” when Frank Hopkins lassoes the release for the killer-trap for the treacherous Bedouin with the line “No one hurts my horse”.
    Up there with the moment in “Shooter” where Mark Wahlberg’s character has a similar scene because the villain killed his dog…

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …after having reassessed my motives during recent days.

    Any discussion among Bachmann/Perry/Santorum need not actually be coordinated, just as any collusion between Romney/Bachmann need not actually be viewed as conclusive. Note that Bachmann immediately squealed when she was asked to drop-out, and note that–at various times–Romney has been said to have pledged the Veep-position to numerous people.

    The beauty of what is occurring is that a lot of fundamental forces are being played-out metaphorically as the players “act out” roles that represent greater concerns [policy-wise]. Thus, as impatient as we all may be for “our” guy/gal to prevail, the most important quotient is the result of musical-chairs; each time the music stops and one fewer chair is available, it is survival that matters.

    That’s why all this “last stand” talk about Perry [see Politico's piece] is far more revelatory about its author[s] than about its topic. This is what animates many comments on RS, for we are confident that Perry will persist long into February [as others fall by the wayside].

    People invoke personal relationships inappropriately when they perceive themselves as larger-than-life…and they often get burned. Consider the movement of Vander Plaats from The Newt to Santorum,, despite the former’s support for his impeachment of the 3 Iowa Supreme Court Justices; the social-behavior was too much for his colleagues, so they delayed their decision, and then agreed-to-disagree [thus, the split...which may be temporary until other people shake-out]. Plaats is embarrassed, The Newt is damaged, Santorum [with what he represents to social-conservatives] is temporarily elevated, and they all live to another day when a revision of their conjoint conduct will necessarily be revised.

    Let us all, please, remember what we learned in 1977 from Star Wars IV [the first flick, remembering how the two trilogies were sequenced]: “Let the Force be with you!”

    RELAX!!!!!

  • bzip

    I think tracker answered the question nicely. So let me see if I am right on this. Your complaint is there is no proof that Newt said that – that seems to be your only concern is my impression.

    So you are okay that Newt lied in front of the American people when he stated he never supported carbon cap mandates yet video of “Newt” shows otherwise?

    You are okay that Newt openly admitted he supports GSE’s (big gov’t)?

    You are okay that Newt support global warming, it was only a few years back (not 20 years) that Newt sat on that couch with Peolsi?

    You are okay that Newt cheated on his wives, twice bringing honesty and trust fron and center?

    You are okay that Newt openly supported TARP?

    You are okay that Newt supported healthcare mandates, flex-fuel car mandates?

    You are okay that Newt supported medcare part D?

    You are okay that Newt was buddies Al Sharpton promoting eduction?

    You are okay that Newt basically lobbied for Frannie?

    And yet you Perry bashing people have the nerve to talk to me about Perry’s occasional gaffes. If you people can gibe Newt a free pass for all his flaws, short coming and “non-conservative” issues the you better explain very clearly and detailed why Perry gets no pass.

  • votemout2012

    The media especially Fox is doing a blackout of Perry and only highlighting these stupid gaffes which are really nothing more than the slip of the tongue. The american ppl need a leader. We can not have the press tell us who we will vote for. Perry 2012.

  • lizzie

    I watched the livestream of Jindal and Perry in Waterloo, Iowa last night. Gov. Jindal went into great detail about how FEMA failed to do what they promised to help evacuate the hospital and nursing home patients, and how one phone call to Gov Perry not only did NOT generate a list of bureaucratic barriers, but that Perry just got the airplanes to where they needed to be when they needed to be. The hallmark of a high-functioning executive who does what he says he will do, and does it well.

    Then Gov. Perry gave what I assume is a variation of his current stump speech, without notes, without a teleprompter, and without a single gaffe, so no media coverage on THAT.

    Leadership is about building confidence, and a host of intangibles that I can not list here. I only wish more voters understood that Rick Perry is a natural – and America needs his resiliency and natural enthusiasm to rebuild America’s confidence in ourselves.

    And, we are long overdue for an American President who knows how to get things done!

    The media coverage today reminds me of 1948 – how they ridiculed Harry S. Truman as a “small man, too small for the office of the Presidency” because he had no formal education and was perceived to be a farmboy hick and worse. Truman accomplished so much, using speeches sparingly for when he needed to rally the divided nation.

    [p.s. have no idea why my comments are again posting twice. in closing today, just remember the main media focus will be all about Romney-Gingrich-Paul, especially Ron Paul, until January 3-4 when the Iowa caucus is done.

    and, if I could pick one endorsement that counts for a LOT, it is Bobby Jindal – far more powerful than Chris Christie’s endorsement. People are measured by the company they keep, and the true friendships they have.

    I hope Anita gives Rick a pair of snowshoes for Christmas because he is going to need them until January 11, 2012!

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …appears to border upon the achievement of a disease-state.

  • Pirohy

    Perry is regarded as GWB II. Republicans down to the local level will get SLAUGHTERED if Perry gets the nomination. Fortunately, there is little chance of that,

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …because the jockeying is being portrayed by the MSM/LSM/ELM as indicative of a “weak” field.

    Certainly, its flaws have been probed; remember, however, that each individual carries strengths.

    So, let’s not become disillusioned; remember, from the perspective of the consensus on RS, Perry is BOTH the correct choice AND the others are sub-optimal alternatives.

    We will get to BHO, don’t you worry!

  • Whacker77

    I’m not going to argue with Erick’s assertion Perry may have the best chance to defeat Obama in the Fall. He might, but he might not either. Right now, I don’t think it really matters who we think has the best chance to win because I don’t believe any of the current candidates can win next year.

    Think about it. We have a president with a 45% approval rating. He forced the most unpopular piece of legislation in memory down our throats. He’s overseen an economy that is stagnant and the unemployment rate is around 9%. Under those circumstances, any of our top tier choices ought to be 10 points ahead, but the best we can do is muster a tie.

    Whether we run Romney, Newt, or Perry, I think we lose the election. Each is compromised in a significant way with the base and that will be tough to overcome. That’s not even figuring into the equation what Obama and the media will do to these guys. I see several months of conservative carping at whomever the choice is much as we saw once McCain locked things up. That won’t help things either.

    Short of a new entrant into the race, I think the cake is almost baked. We shouldn’t have to accept these mediocre candidates and the baggae they have. Maybe it too late for a white knight, but we can do better than what we’re being offered. I still think Jeb, Jindal, or Christie could jump in and win this thing.

  • buster93

    I was born in the Detroit area . So I consider myself a Michigander still. However I moved to Louisiana was I was 8. Anyway I was crushed to see the impact of the economy in Detroit and the state. I have lived in Texas since 1990 and I really like Rick Perry as Governor. Rick Perry 2012 has plan for the economy written out on his website. He can take individual states and apply his job creation ideas to that state. Each state is different however many principles would apply. Rick Perry is the only one that could jump start this economy and keep it running !!!!!
    God Bless Michigan!!! I miss the snow !!!
    From one Michigander to now a Texan . Go Rick Perry!!!!

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    [what did Anita say?]

  • texasroots

    you are so wonderful! I really enjoy reading all you write. Keep it going.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    someone should compile our stuff, just as i try episodically to consolidate gobs of data [here, and now elsewhere]

  • jaykali

    We know you want to Erick, you are already doing it in a de-facto sort of way.

    I wish Rick had run a better campaign, it’s never too late if he has a comeback in Iowa but he is very much on the Biden level of gaffes per news-cycle and that will just give you a reputation of being dumb unfortunately.

    His conservative credentials are great but I think people rightly question his ability to run a competent campaign, particularly against the the great campaigner-in-chief.

  • Wiseman

    Jokes are always funnier when they are true. Perry would be destroyed in the general election, only winning in the deep south! Eric loses more credibility everyday by saying Perry has a better chance to win the general than Romney. Total nonsense!

  • dave2131

    Who cares about his gaffes. Even the great orator (Obama in case you’re wondering ;) )has them. Of course the media is going to nail him for it too. He does need to try and reduce the “oops” moments though. Regardless, I believe he is a very conservative candidate who can win. Right now, I still think he will be the nominee…I don’t think anyone can match the jobs Governor’s record.

    Also, if you go to his website (rickperry.org) that momentum video he has is awesome. I think that is the best campaign video I’ve seen from anyone yet. Gives me goosebumps…

  • clowngirl

    1. Readers are going to make note of your biases and perceived biases anyway and look at anything you say about any candidate through that prism.

    You’re not seen as less biased just because you haven’t officially endorsed anyone.

    2. Perry doesn’t get the full benefit of your endorsement (or a RedState site endorsement. A lot of front pagers have endorsed Perry – and I was glad to see that*, but the fact it wasn’t the whole site, the fact that you — the most well known blogger at RedState has not endorsed him — conveys a sense that their are reservations about his candidacy — for the full site to confidently endorse him would be much stronger and could give him a boost.

    3. It starts to seem like some kind of word game. You’re not endorsing but it seems fairly obvious you want Rick Perry to win. It provokes the thought “why doesn’t he just endorse Perry” and puts a lot of attention on you rather than on what you are saying about Perry.

    I already have forgotten most of why you were praising Perry and his campaign — because it’s the “what is Erick doing here?” question is what held my attention.

    * It would be my first choice to have RedState endorse Newt — but seeing as that obviously isn’t going to happen, I really, really don’t want Ron Paul or Mitt Romney to win Iowa and really don’t want to see both of them finishing in the top three – so a strong turnout for Governor Perry would be desirable.

    Ideally, I’d like the top three to be Newt, Perry, Santorum — but realistically Newt, Perry, Romney OR Ron Paul with one or the other of them finishing fourth. Perry, Gingrich, Romney – I could live with. Newt would still have a chance in NH and SC and at least the Ron Paul supporters wouldn’t get any encouragement.

  • http://www.RightFace.us dkolonia

    Hard to tell by the comments. Perry is probably a great guy and he is saying some great things lately. I could support him. The reason (to me) why he had those mistakes is because he did not prepare enough. At times he speaks very well and other times he is not so good. I love what he says but in today’s politics you MUST be a good speaker. People love Obama because they think he is smart based on his speeches and that deep voice. Perry says ‘uhh’ every other word it seems at times and that hurts him. Many people also relate a slow talking southerner with being stupid. I am from the south so I know.
    If he had taken a month of Dale Carnegie speaking courses before he started his campaign it would have made a huge difference. Good speakers are not just born with it they learn how to do it!

  • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

    Tell me! I love Miss Anita.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …it’s obvious that EE likes Perry, but that affection has been disciplined.

    RS-readers [and CNN viewers] have benefited in the process.

    So, lay-off the bias-accusations and note essential-truths that you read @ RS [and watch how they're sliced/diced] before they are articulated elsewhere.

    I’m assessing BigGovernment, and I’m appreciating the seriousness of the participants therein, but I return to RS as a resource for cogent/profound analysis.

    [still need to finish page #2]

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …by ESTABLISHMENT politicos.

    Let’s watch how everyone evolves, in real-time.

  • Common_Cents

    Since so many undecideds, a last minute bus tour right before caucus will be of interest to Iowans to hear his case.

  • tailfins1959

    Perry has a lot to offer the Northeast. He has managed urban problems in Dallas and Houston. That includes the onslaught of Katrina refugees. If he proves his competence in general, Southern New England would benefit from a Perry presidency. Republicans won’t lose New England from whomever is atop the ticket, they will lose because the recession has mostly passed us by, except in Rhode Island.

  • Common_Cents

    I’d think Perry could use a RS boost about now to continue any momentum.

    I think many are curious to know what is holding you back from endorsing Perry?

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …because polling shifts rapidly, as you should have learned long ago.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    We know you want to, Kaykali; you are already doing it in a de-facto sort of way.

    I wish Rick had run a better campaign, it?s never too late if he has a comeback in Iowa but he is NOT on the Biden level of gaffes per news-cycle and that will NOTjust give you a reputation of being dumb fortunately.

    His conservative credentials are great but I think people WRONGLY question his ability to run a competent campaign, particularly against the the great TOTUS.

  • buster93

    I’m sorry I didn’t include my reasons why I like his platform.
    Energy and he will use our resources safely!!!. More drilling and natural gas exploration for starters!!= cheaper energy bills for Michigan=more $$$ in your pocket.
    Decreased use of regulations . There are so many nothing gets done .
    Companies move to Texas because of no state income tax, cheaper cost of living, tax burden less on companies to start up.
    loser pay laws for lawsuits.
    Texas is a global economy!!
    I like Rick Perry he the only one that served in the Military besides Dr. Paul. He really cares about Americans and people. He does things for a good reason.
    He does have a strong faith and with that he can get this economy up and running.
    This may not be detailed enough Steve Forbes has alot on the flat tax idea with Rick Perry!!
    God Bless America !!!! RICK PERRY 2012

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    It has no conscience.
    It gets into everything.
    It leaves a bloody mess when it’s done.
    and it never takes responsibility for the consequences of its cad-like behavior.

  • swamphermit

    She’s the wife of a Texas ‘Pretty Boy’ so Anita says a lot, since she ‘Wears the Pants’ in her family.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …throughout even fly-over America?

  • retire05

    The south (Florida) will be a determining factor in the upcoming elections. Now, you may view Florida as a state that is just full of snowbirds who have fled the high tax northern states for sunny climes, but the largest ranch in the nation is in Florida. And Florida has lots and lots of blue collar workers and farmers, who can relate to someone like Rick Perry.

    Remember, Iowa, South Carolina, New Hampshire and Florida, due to their erroneous decision to jump ahead of the rest of the nation, will have to award delegates according to proportional vote this time. That means that by the end of those primaries, we could still be facing now having a front runner.

    Texas, with its millions of voters will be a player this time. And solid blue states, and those that will vote for a northeastern RINO, will see their impact diminished due to loss of population.

    It ain’t over until its over and every primary has been held.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …and if Perry’s people monitor this website, perhaps he can pick-up a tutor who will ride the bus with him!

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    I can’t imagine that an elocution coach would be too expensive and it would be money well spent for visiting areas where people might be impressed by a less regional dialect. Some people, though, discount intelligence not because of an actual accent (I talk like a Western Pennsylvanian with a hint of my maternal grandmother’s Ontario accent), but because of where someone is from, and there’s no reason for him to run away from his background.

  • retire05

    Anita Perry is known for not hitting the campaign trail. She is not a player (like Hillary or Ann Romney) and is a great lady.

    When Perry became governor, everyone said that Anita Perry would never be able to fill Laura Bush’s shoes since everyone in Texas, including the yellow dogs, loved Laura. They were wrong. Anita Perry has been a great first lady. You will not find anyone with more class.

    And she doesn’t go around telling people that not voting for Rick would be stupid like Ann Romney told a crowd that not voting for her husband would be “stupid.” So according to elitist Ann, if you don’t vote for her RINO husband, you are stupid.

    No thanks, Ann. I think I’ll stick with voting to have Anita as the First Lady of the land.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    1. As noted earlier, EE is maxing-out on his pundit-flexibility.
    2. It is as inappropriate to encroach upon his personal space as it would be to mandate that Sarah declare once-and-for-all whether she is ever going to declare her candidacy for POTUS, SCOTUS, or anything else.
    3. Anyone who places Paul above any other candidate has a set of screws that are both loose and losing their potential-grip.
    4. Perry will benefit from any/all support, but people @ RS will benefit maximally by reading blogging that is devoid of innate sarcasm.

  • federalfarmer1

    But, I’m avoiding temptation and will try to follow the newtsters lead and avoid saying anything negative about Perry.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    I’ll give my post the most snotty anti-Rick Perry Title that comes to mind, and then aschew all negativity in the body below. Your like the Hippy Girlfriend from Hell when you pull that garbage.

  • Pirohy

    just your average, middle-class, rank-and-file Republicans.

  • Common_Cents

    This isn’t a “pundit” horse race calling site.

    It’s a conservative activist site that prides itself on grass roots efforts for conservatives. It touts it’s early call for Rubio. Why not do the same for Perry?

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …so you conjure a distinction-without-a-difference.

  • clowngirl

    I’d be curious to hear more about that and better understand your POV. :)

  • http://www.planettron.com NickDeringer

    Can you recall a Presidential primary in the last 50 years that has had some many frontrunners? The idea that “Any one of our candidates can beat One-bama” is just happy talk from the screamers on talk radio. I am not discouraged…yet. If Perry doesn’t get his campaign on track, then we will be left with Romney. Newt is finished and it’s looking like Crazy Ron Paul is will win Iowa. The fact that a nut job like Paul can win ANY primary is a sign that voters are getting desperate; a sure sign of a “weak field.”

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I can recommend phonics classes if it was too tough for you to read.

  • Menlo

    At least it cannot do so with regard to elections.

    However, I would contend that I have believed since 2009 no one would beat Obama, and I still do. I’m starting to think he could exceed his 2008 margins against any of the GOP nominees..

  • jaykali

    I was very excited ab Rick Perry. I am from Texas for crying out loud. He very much is on the Biden level, you’ve heard the jokes ab him being ‘Bush w/out the brains’. I think absolutely you can criticize his campaign. He just is not good in debates and not even very good at speaking in general. I really wish he was, he would be WINNING right now.

    I don’t know what planet you’re living on but you need open your eyes. Look if I could pick 1 candidate I hope can pull a ‘Tebow’ in Iowa it would be him bc if he could get some momentum maybe he could look like a legitimate threat but he just f’s it up. I mean we all saw the Jindal exchange the other day when he forgot a detail of his OWN plan. This kind of stuff is a problem.

  • Menlo

    He supported the toilet ban.

  • http://www.planettron.com NickDeringer

    ….

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …I try to eschew redundancy.

  • jakeofalltrades

    and just forget about it. Erick’s endorsement probably doesn’t matter to anyone who isn’t already a Redstater, and we’re so opinionated as a group that I doubt it would change many minds.

    The only purpose his endorsement would serve would be as a bludgeon for Perry supporters to use in alienating everyone else.

    No thanks.

  • cbartlett

    I think Perry’s biggest challenge right now is the freaking media – ALL of them. I don’t understand it, but I sure see it. Dick Morris and Karl Rove are the worst! I hope Perry at least has enough of a showing in IA that they can’t ignore him anymore like they are doing right now. I am encouraged by the postings here that are describing good experiences on the ground. Heaven knows, we certainly won’t hear it on Fox….

  • btpull

    Looking at the data Perry?s job record is mediocre at best. Total non-farm jobs grew by a little over a 1 million in the past 11 years with 25% of those jobs in government. The total jobs created in Texas under Perry has not keep-up with the overall increase in the Texas labor force.

    When Perry took office the unemployment rate in Texas was at 4.2%; it is now 8.1% (the US is at 8.6%). The unemployment rate in Texas was higher than the overall US rate through 2006.

    Texas?s unemployment has been lower but has trended with the general US rate since then. The data clearly shows Texas?s employment picture has benefited from the higher crude oil price environment of the last 5 years.

    It is true that Texas unemployment over the last 3 years has not been as bad as the US as whole. Texas? rate peaked at 8.5% vs 10.10% for the US as a whole. However, Texas? employment has not improved as fast the US in general over the last couple of years. Unemployment in Texas actually worsened for most of 2011; in January the rate was 8.3%, which deteriorated to 8.5% in August and September.

  • texabama

    but I’m really starting to bang my head against the wall when it comes to supposed Republican voters. How did Newt even rise as far as he has and how could Ron Paul now be in the ascendency? Have people lost their collective minds? It’s almost like they’re choosing candidates blindfolded while aiming at a dartboard.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …here are the rest of the highlights of page 2; all but the first two postings are anti-Perry, although it appears we have covered them all @ RS.

    *

    Texascitizen wrote: ?RICK PERRY is the only real person on the stage, not an invented persona.?

    *

    Slveryder:

    [Perry] Versus…an inarticulate Chicagoan who had a vision of “Hope” and “Change”?

    No, what we need is someone who actually has a platform and goals. Newt & Romney have “visions” but those are about as coherent as an LSD trip. I’ve had three years of wincing over the great orator’s news conferences (before he stopped giving them after the press actually asked him real questions). I’m fine with another Texan.

    I’ll take a Texan, Alaskan, Floridian, Wisconsinite, basically anyone who can do the job. Santorum & Huntsman aren’t memorable, Newt & Romney can’t figure out their political leanings, Bachmann is acting like a stereotypical hysterical female, and Paul as President has no power to accomplish the stuff he wants without resorting to Executive Order.

    Perry is memorable, consistent, steady, and has a limited set of major goals to accomplish.

    ***

    From htales:

    “The radicalization of Islam is a great concern,” Perry said. “Islam of and by itself is one of the great religions, along with Christianity and Judaism.” He recalled meeting one of the Democratic candidates for Texas governor in the recent election. “He?s a Palestinian. And he and I were having a conversation about Ground Zero. How do you deal with this? He said, well, it?s pretty easy. He said, ‘Build a synagogue, a temple, and a church there. And bring these people together.’ ”

    http://www.vpr.net/npr/131048009/

    I think statements like this, which Perry made in 2010, are a concern because it reflects a world view for someone whose going to be in charge of foreign policy. George Bush expressed similar views on Islam; by the end of his term he was calling for Israel to return to the 1967 borders, yet you ask George Bush and he would still tell you that he is “Pro-Israel.”

    *

    From htales:

    Is Rick Perry credible on TARP? This is Rick Perry’s letter to Congress after TARP was voted down in September, 2008.

    “As leaders of our respective organizations, we don’t always see eye to eye on policy, but we come together today with one clear purpose. We strongly urge Congress to leave partisanship at the door and pass an economic recovery package. We both believe that it?s time to stand together for our country.

    “There is a time for partisanship and there is a time for getting things done. No one likes the hand they’ve been dealt, and now is not the time to assign blame. It is time for Washington, D.C. to step up, be responsible and do what’s in the best interest of American taxpayers and our economy.

    “This economic crisis is not just impacting Wall Street; it is also making life harder for everyday Americans. Americans across the country and in every demographic are feeling the pinch. If Congress does not act soon, the situation will grow appreciably worse. It’s time for leadership. Congress needs to act now.”

    And here is Perry one year later claiming that the same letter made to a Democrat Congress was actually against Tarp and for cutting taxes and spending:

    ?As a matter of fact, I signed a letter with the Governor of West Virginia, who?s a Democrat, when September/October a year ago, when they were talking about, Oh my goodness, the economy is tanking. We?ve got to do something. We signed a letter that basically said you know don?t get all frozen up in fear, act. I didn?t know we needed to write it out for them and say stop spending all of the money and cut the taxes. That?s the blueprint that worked. And still we got people that voted for this bailout; that was in hindsight now just an absolute giveaway, didn?t help the economy at all.?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o38-vVjnvsw

    *

    From nowathand:

    My posts are disappearing and being deleted.

    Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney give you all the things Perry does but with fluent English and less baggage.

    I’d vote for none of them, but I respect Santorum and Romney even if I think they are misguided.

    The conservatives and libertarians in this primary will bring out Rick Perry’s DREAM Act, bi-national health care, slush funds, lies in the debates, compromising national security with Huawei, the bumbling of the TSA, the ACORN ties, his ties to Bush people, and bigger deficits than Bush.

    The mainstream media will bring up the curious firings and bad evidence in the killing of Cameron Todd Willingham, the Bible signings, his friend and false teacher Todd Parsley, his friend and sexual deviant/false teacher Mike Bickle, his friend and bigoted false teacher Rick Joyner, his friend and bigoted false teacher Cindy Jacobs, and his book remarks about social security.

    He has utterly failed to make his message of jobs known, maybe because so many Texas residents are underemployed and the net jobs numbers aren’t good.

    All the average voter will see is “George W. Bush” with a strange edge based on his “There’s something wrong in America when we let gay people lay down their lives for this country” ad.
    If you want a chicken hawk that can win, Santorum and Romney are your guys. If you want limited government and a less violent foreign policy, you gotta go with Ron Paul (or maybe Herman Cain, if he comes back).

    *

    From BeeKaay:

    A guy who sold the governorship for $5,000 to Big Pharma so he could force parents to buy one particular vaccine; imagine what he will do with presidential executive orders.

    If you thought Obamacare’s individual mandate was disgusting, wait until he makes his order…..

    *

    From eRtwngr:

    I agree that watching Perry debate brings back the stomach tightening moments of the Reagan debates, where you held your breath hoping he could complete a thought, but that’s not decisive for me. To elect a Texan again means to sacrifice the immigration issue. Their perspective is different because they are on the border and have learned to coexist with Mexico and the mass of refugees from the drug wars. I’m more concerned about globalism and the trans-national highway. But I’d still give him a chance over Romney and Gingrich.

    *

    From Charm2:

    Perry’s comment that he would make government as insignificant in our lives as possible definitely wins points with me. Newt winning a debate with Obama would be nice to see…..if he could do it. I saw a video of Newt debating John Kerry on the environment. Kerry kept interrupting Newt and asking for time to speak and Newt kept conceding his time to him. Newt, also being the guy that always “has a better idea”, ended up positioning himself to the left of Kerry by the end of the debate. Sound similar to Newt and Pelosi sitting on a bench advocating for more environmental regulations? Being potus requires much more than debating skills so basing your choice in potus on whether a guy can win a debate or not is risky business.

    Perry alienated conservatives with his comment on immigration and he felt the sting. Maybe he has learned something and maybe he hasn’t. Perry has governed for 12 years and he has been hot on securing that border. When Newt was speaker, he had an opportunity to take much more conservative action and threw it away. Romney was governor for one term and knew he wasn’t going to be re-elected. So we have 2 leading guys that got the opportunity and blew it. How lucky are you feeling?

    Perry is worth a second look. His recent back surgery seemed to play a role in his energy level earlier in his campaign because he certainly is not showing as much fatigue as he was. He is also thinking better. Pain pills for his back may have been the culprit for that as well as for his comedian episode earlier in his campaign when people thought he was drunk. He will never be a great debater, but I’d rather have a can do potus than a flip flopper or a candidate who so loves the sound of his own voice that he uses his ability to talk to distract you by weaving a path that makes almost anything he says seem plausible because he references several historical events, but you’ll never know whether his answer actually makes sense because he went on and on you forgot what the question was or you just tuned out. I’d say Perry is more conservative than either Romney or Newt, but can he win? That is the question for me. We need to see more of him and hear more from him.

    *

    From littlebum2002:

    Pretty bad logic here. They are promoting Perry because they feel he would be the best President. (Odd, though, that a writer for a site campaigning against Big Government would support a Social Conservative, who supports Big Government infringing on the private lives of citizens, but that’s another matter).
    Is Perry the best candidate for President? I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and say OK. Does it matter? Nope.
    Every person even slightly right of center is voting for anyone-but-obama. Our country is pretty evenly split, so let’s say that’s about 50% of the population. If you run a far-right candidate, then everyone even slightly left of center will vote for Obama. The election will be a toss-up. Given that Obama is the incumbent, he’s a shoo-in.

    Now let’s run a Moderate. Everyone right of center will STILL VOTE FOR HIM, since he is not-Obama. But guess what? He’s a moderate, so he might actually earn some votes from the other side, and actually give the GOP a chance of victory.

    I’m a Libertarian, so I don’t care who wins this election. It’s a lose-lose. Either we re-elect Obama, and keep spending our way into oblivion, or we elect a Republican and return to supporting Big-Government policies like requiring gay military members to lie to their superiors and defending unconstitutional laws telling people who they are allowed to marry.

    The GOP needs to make a choice. Do you nominate a REALLY GOOD candidate who doesn’t stand a chance of winning? Or do you nominate a Moderate candidate who does? It’s not looking good. Every poll has Obama winning. The betting odds have Obama winning. They guy who has successfully predicted the last 7 Presidential elections has Obama winning. http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whisp…

    Nominate a far-right candidate, and you’ll guarantee that victory. Extremists win primaries. Moderates win elections.

  • annplato

    Newt has as much chance of becoming the nominee as any of the rest if not more.

    I don’t like when any of the candidates are presented with their “flaws” emphasized and their values diminished.

    I like all of our candidates, except for Ron Paul, who obviously is a marginal nut case. They all have ?flaws?, but trying to find perfection in any human being is wasting a lot of talent and giving the opposition fodder to diminish our candidates.

    I?d like if Perry could get his act together without having to excuse him for pain and pain-medication. If he really believes what he says, thought about them long and hard as to have become part of him, he could not forget them even under the greatest stress.

    I?d like Michele Bachman, if she just wouldn?t be so catty. Using repetitively ?I am the only consistent conservative? is getting old. She is, but then, in order to be attractive, she should moderate her attacks, so as not to look so desperate. Furthermore, she can claim that she fought this and that, but did she actually win fights, as Newt did?

    I like Santorum A LOT. But he doesn?t seem to get any traction. Also he does not seem to have any particular plan he can present that sound even close to be able to change course and get us back to economic recovery.

    Romney wouldn?t be bad as president, if he could get enough gumption to be able to fight dirty with Obama rather than Newt. He also seems to be desperate in a destructive way.

    That leaves Newt, who in spite of making off the cuff remarks that don?t seem well thought through, he DOES have a successful past of leadership with strong liberal opposition. He ?crossed the aisle? and made the left turn right, rather than vice-versa. His innovative ideas and his ability to accept his rivals as ?good people with good ideas? is a big plus. At least he is not in the business of quashing his rivals to make them easier targets for the Obama machine when the time comes to win the general election.
    Newt has my support and respect, but were it someone else to win the nomination, I?ll vote for any of our candidates, except Ron Paul.

  • jakeofalltrades

    Please keep writing; you raise the level of discourse here.

  • icesweeper

    That may wear off fairly soon. But if he had any kind of major back surgery, he is or at least was most likely on some pain meds early this fall. They can really mess with one’s thought processes and cognitive abilities. There are reasons why the warnings are on the bottles.

    Even if he wasn’t on meds, having back pain sucks. It can make it difficult or impossible to focus. Plus the man has a state to run, a large one, by the way. None of the others up on the stage have the responsibilities he has currently. Also, he may not be the smartest one in the room, so what? We’ve had two recent Dem Presidents who were, as we were told, and look what that got us. A person’s morals and convictions are more important than their IQ.

    He does need to level with us about his surgery and followup health care. That would probably fall under his communication director’s job.

  • jrfromdallas

    to the people on the street and the fact that his camp took your criticism and didn’t shy away from it speaks volumes with the way they understand the plight of Main Street. It is time for all of the Conservatives out there Hannity/Rush/Hewitt/Ingrahm to endorse Perry and watch him rocket past Newt and Mittens to the nomination.

  • Aaron Gardner

  • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

    Good old-fashioned American romance is what it is.

    Let’s see if this works…testing testing.

  • texashistorian

    It’s up to Perry and his campaign to make the different case once he starts campaigning. Perceptions can be changed. We in Texas know he’s no GWB II, and it’s a matter of communicating it. Are you telling me that voters in the Northeast are going to flock to liberal Dems down ballot because of a Perry candidacy? That they are all of a sudden going to think Obama is good after all and that means electing Reps, Senators, state reps etc who will advance the BHO agenda because they assume a Texas accent means Perry is GWB II? If that is so, it’s no wonder the Northeast is such a big government mess.

  • Aaron Gardner
  • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

    I’m not so computer illiterate as I thought! Whoo-hoo! Isn’t she lovely in blue? (Jots down fashion note…”Anita Perry up there with Kate Middleton in Classically Feminine Fashion”)

    P.S. Swamp_hermit, it’s horrid to think that you’d say such nasty things about a very sweet, godly, and graceful lady. It’s one thing to talk nasty about Perry, it’s quite another to attack his wife. Shame on you!

  • btpull

    Ratios and rates factor out changes in scale.

  • texashistorian

    because they have to keep working after an election. Why bother to alienate a campaign (in this case five campaigns) by endorsing a primary candidate, and then lose the good will or connections with those folks a year down the road when the pundit needs news, interviews, etc.

  • Lesstressrx

    WOW…I DON’T KNOW A CANDIDATE ON OUR SIDE I WOULD DESCRIBE WITH SO MUCH HOSTILITY.

  • jrfromdallas

    And this was done by someone that doesn’t even care for Perry. You can’t argue with math. Let me know if you still feel the same way when you’re done digesting this….

    http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1590

  • Aaron Gardner

    You missed the point.

  • tyman

    I see real stability with those two. That should NOT be underestimated in The White House!

    I’ve heard over and over that a President is never more conservative than his wife. I think that was part of W’s problem..

    If Anita’s the one that told Rick to run because he owed it to his country, that’s really saying something about his motivation and how conservative he would govern.

    You can say all you want about Bush, but I think a lot of people would be happy with W now because of his values. Perry isn’t Bush, but I think the values are what America needs right now!

  • notpropagandized

    [ Don't mention that Calista was the mistress and 3rd wife! If Newt got into the White House, then there would be 2 infidels.]
    Other than that and all the other sordid stuff, Newt really is a fantastic candidate and he’d get my anti-Obama vote in a heartbeat.
    [ Does anyone notice that Calista looks like she came out of Dallas in the 1960's and uses a case of hairspray / month? ]

    Bad, bad notpropagandized! So bad and rude.

  • remalimo

    Rick Perry has done some good things in TEXAS but much of his success was garnered by his predicessors. OIL is the lifeblood of Texas (I have been in the Oil and Gas business for over 45 years). Effective with Jan 1, 2010 Perry and the Texas Legislators put into law legislation where many of Texas Oil and Gas producing wells have been plugged because no one looked to see what effect the legislation would have on the inductry. I am a victom of the legislation and due to that legislation I have lost in excess of 3500 bbls of oil per year for at least 10 years. This oil will never be drilled and be recovered again for to drill and equip a well to recover the reserve would cost in access of $1,000,000.

    As I was plugging the well the Tx RRC rep explained to me that he just attended the plugging of 3 wells that were producing in access of 15 bbls/well. Want to do the math. TX receives 4.6% of each $ of oil sold and 7.5% of each $ of MCF sold plus the advalorem tax collected each is approximately 6% of the reserves in the ground. How much tax money lost much less how much of the money lost to the economy. Again you do the math.

    I am a TEXAN (GODs Country) and have voted for Perry each time that he has ran for office but since I have been directly affected by his legialation I am giving second thought to his capability to legislate and manage! One of the earlier postings about why Perry lost some of the early debates was that he had not taken the time to prepare for the debate. As President of the USA that is unforgiveable (Obama?).

    When I view most of the candidates I see one of the most enterjetic canidates and the most prepared to step into the job with guns blazing is Newt. Newt is a ball of fire and has prepared himself. As for the Judicial system I believe it needs to have a shot fired over its bow to wake the judges wakeup to let them know that they can be dealt with if they continue to legislate and not inturputate. When I hire people to work for me I like for them to be prepared (Balanced Budget 4 times – Only Candidate, Been in charge of the Legislators – only one; Resigned his office because of 85 charges levied against his but only two were founded and they were minor violatins.

    Ovr 50% of marrages end up in Divorce. I know it takes 2 people to make a marrage work. Newt has taken the high road to try to get elected (11th commandment) in the R party race but I believe that he will carry a GUN to the General Election.

  • bzip

    n/t

  • notpropagandized

    OK, fine. There’s no one in the field that’s anywhere near perfect, and including Perry. But the reality is that he’s the best governor by a long shot. He builds a cogent and loyal team, is honest, has humility, etc. Details on his feet is not a forte’, OK? So if that’s the case, why do you default to Romney (please list his faults here) or to Gingrich (please list his faults here) or to whomever (please list his/her faults here).

    Yes, how nice it would be if Perry were skilled on his feet. But all in all, he’s the one with the best governing record and policy platform that fits conservatives.

    Yes, we’re painfully embarrassed by his gaffes, but he’s still the best governor.

    acat should opine on this as well. streiff? Erick?

  • tyman

    I wish they could see this.

    I think that was a REAL problem in 2008. Rush may not endorse, but he had no problem with operation chaos. Now, Obama has no competition. I just can’t believe Rush is playing the game of Santorum /Bachmann and Perry. He needs to pick one.

    Santorum, as EE pointed out on Boortz’s show yesterday, is NOT a fiscal conservative.

    Both Santorum and Bachmann neither have the funds or the ground game to run nationally.

    I really think that Bachmann is still in it to block for Romney. What a conservative she is! NOT.

    I hope a good Perry showing in Iowa shows them! I think he will do very well in SC, too!

  • texabama

    and you really know how to express what I’m thinking. When I first saw Gingrich rising in the polls, my first thought was, “this retread?” I couldn’t believe someone who hasn’t been in the forefront nationally in 15 years was considering running for President.

    I know we all have a tendency to harken back to “the good old days”, but this nostalgic craze for Newt is nuts.

  • federalfarmer1

    Overall Perrys record is pretty good, and knockout dragout fights to correct candibot puffery aren’t worth it. It never changes minds anyway.

    As a matter of campaign strategy, Perry , and bachmann and santorum, have to take newts support to succeed. Ron pauls support is coming from outside the party, and romney has his solid base of pragmatic, establishment supporters. That’s not an attack on Perry, its just a fact. everybody knows attacks work, which is why Newt is being worked over like he is.

  • texashistorian

    for plugging the wells, and do you happen to know which law it is? I’d like to look at it. I am disagreeing necessarily that it was a stupid law, but surely there was some kind of reason given for plugging. Is this the “Orphan Wells” thing?

  • supergirl2911

    today. Maybe all week. I love a relevant and humorous click. Thanks, streiff. Still laughing.

  • ceili_dancer

    winning in every state is important, but as for the republican brand in the northeast,… well, the establishment has done such a wonderful job of promoting it up there.

  • romansdaughter

    Rick Perry is all male to me….maybe handsome but not pretty and isn’t Anita so beautiful and gracious.

  • supergirl2911

    For comparison, I received communications this year early on from Bachman, Cain, and Perry. (sighed up on their websites, facebook, etc.)
    In 2008, I received communications and volunteered for Fred Thompson and then John McCain.
    In 2000 and 2004 I received communication and volunteered (2000) for the Bush campaign.
    Their communication is at the top of the group. They communicate daily. They include relevant media stories and videos on Perry. They have regular YouTube videos and paid media buys. They communicate a consistent message by email and facebook. For direct comparison, I barely received any communication from the McCain campaign and he was the nominee.

  • cbartlett

    You may have already seen this but here is a link to a letter endorsing Perry written by TX Rep. Wayne Christian, who has been voted the most conservative State Rep in the state. Wayne has been MY state representative for many years and even though he has openly disagreed with Perry at times over some issues, he expresses extreme respect for Perry’s character and leadership in Texas. One of the items he discusses is the TTC issue, with facts, not myths. I personally worked on a portion of the TTC project for more than 6 years and saw all of this unfold. Wayne does an excellent job of chronicling many of the details of a very difficult project in this letter. This is a great testament to Perry. I encourage everyone to check it out – sure wish the media would get on board. Sigh.
    http://www.texasinsider.org/?p=52060

  • geoph

    Thanks!

  • heraklios

    If Perry could sweep the South (which he would) and nail down most of the intermountain west, plains and some states in the midwest (highly possible), then he will win. With Barrack Obama at the top of the ticket I have little doubt Republicans in the Northeast will get slaughtered anyway no matter who we nominate for President. I think we just have to discount that and move on.

  • heraklios

    If Perry could sweep the South (which he would) and nail down most of the intermountain west, plains and some states in the midwest (highly possible), then he will win. With Barrack Obama at the top of the ticket I have little doubt Republicans in the Northeast will get slaughtered anyway no matter who we nominate for President. I think we just have to discount that and move on.

  • ceili_dancer

  • romansdaughter

    Oh sorry, I forgot you said that somehow you can’t do a diary on RedState. I wonder what the problem is??

  • supergirl2911

    This was posted on this site a few months ago and it was worth the read. It also destroys the lam e attack that only low paying jobs were created in Texas. Lame because inherent in the criticism is that a low paying job is somehow worse than unemployment.

  • supergirl2911

    check it out.

  • texabama

    has us talking about the tax proposal. All the candidates misspeak on the campaign trail I honestly don’t know how they have the stamina and cheer to get out there daily and speak to groups and the media for so many hours.

    It’s unfortunate that Perry tripped on this one, but it shows that Jindal does know Perry’s policies and is supporting him based on that and not political expediency. It also makes people think about that tax proposal again, as it seems to be one of the many things that people have lost focus on.

  • romansdaughter

    Sorry, I get all girly on things like this. I love it! Thanks for posting LouPat! And yes, she looks lovely in blue.

  • texabama

    and they keep telling us it’s the Southerners who are prejudiced. All people had to hear was that Perry was from Texas and the GW Bush comparisons began. Imagine if people assumed that every politician from New Jersey was like Jon Corzine!

  • notpropagandized

    Been watching this a long time. It is painfully obvious that despite his awful gaffes and fumbling of information that Perry is by far the superior governor. Too bad that DC has become so powerful and consequently so much the focus of attention that celebrity, charisma and clarity come at a premium. Perry falls short in each. But Romney, Pawlenty, Gingrich, Santorum, Bachmann are woefully deficient in public/private executive and governing capabilities by comparison. Only Huntsman performed in the same governing echelon as has Perry.

    Perry builds a loyal team, is honest, seeks to do the right thing, has humility and searches his heart and wisdom of others in reaching his final decisions.

    We should ask ourselves why we’re sizing up our candidates as we would celebrities or American Idol contestants? Many of our good and great presidents from the past would not have a chance in our modern entertainment oriented culture.

    Woe. Perry will likely be ignored by the electorate. But the fact remains that he’s the best governor and WOULD BE the best president.

  • circlegranch

    I admire Mrs. Perry, honor their family story and stand firm for

    RICK PERRY
    PRESIDENT 2012

  • circlegranch

    I admire Mrs. Perry, honor their family story and stand firm for

    RICK PERRY
    PRESIDENT 2012

  • reggie182

    Am I OK with everything Newt has done or everyone of the positions on a countless number of issues that What I am OK with primarily is that he is chiefly responsible for the Federal budget being in surplus for four years running, and for realizing welfare reform. Those achievements are far more impressive than anything Rick Perry or any of the other candidates have done.

    Aside from that continuously bashing anyone who has the audacity to run against Rick Perry is doing him no good. He seems stuck at about ten percent and has been for many weeks now. The majority of Americans and Republicans have sized him up to be out of his depth.

  • reggie182

    Am I OK with everything Newt has done or everyone of the positions on a countless number of issues that he has studied and opined upon. What I am OK with primarily is that he is chiefly responsible for the Federal budget being in surplus for four years running, and for realizing welfare reform. Those achievements are far more impressive than anything Rick Perry or any of the other candidates have done.

    Aside from that continuously bashing anyone who has the audacity to run against Rick Perry is doing him no good. He seems stuck at about ten percent and has been for many weeks now. The majority of Americans and Republicans have sized him up to be out of his depth.

  • texabama

    I wouldn’t like Newt. Newt’s problems are the same whether or not Perry is in the race.

  • Whacker77

    It’s called reality. The candidates stink. The real story of the 2012 election should be about those who didn’t run.

    Mitt is a phoney, Newt is shameless self promoter, Perry seems out of his league, and Bachmann more often than not seems like the Republican version of Alan Grayson.

    Jim Geragthy was right. A debate featuring the campaign surrogates would be far better than the candidates themselves. In the last two days, Christie, Jindal, and JC Watts have made the rounds for their guys.

  • Common_Cents

    His gaffes make him super high risk as the left will be out for gaffe blood. One flub in a debate and its obama for another 4 years. It’s that simple.

  • texabama

    I can’t believe you would say that you wouldn’t flub up even if you were in pain if you sincerely believed something. Having recently gone through chemo I can tell you, unequivocally, that under certain medical circumstances you don’t know how you will react. Medications can cause all kinds of reactions and individual chemistry is a huge factor. I admire Perry all the more for taking on the task of campaigning while “stressed” and not making an issue of it.

  • retire05

    Let’s stick to what we do know, OK?

    In January, 2001, one month after Perry became governor, there was 10,466,735 people in the Texas workforce, with 10,023,806 employed for a unemployment rate of 4.6%

    By October, 2011, almost 11 years later, the workforce is now 12,361,646 with 11,364,484 employed, That represents a ten year increase in the work force by 1,894,911 additional workers. The employeed from Jan. 01 saw an increase of jobs from the Jan,. 01 figure of 10,023,806 for an increase in jobs reaching 11,364,484 or an increase in jobs of 1,340,

  • audax

    nt

  • scchuck

    Gerald Ford was one of the best athletes to be President, an all star football player for the University of Michigan and a low handicap golfer. Yet Ford endured a tremendous negative media about a few physical stumbles magnified by Chevy Chase on Saturday Night Live in the days before online viral videos. Even Ford acknowledged it had some impact. Ford also had some miscues in his debate with Carter over Soviet domination of Eastern Europe. While Rick Perry may be able to overcome his mistakes to date, I believe the negative media for Perry will be just as great as the likely attacks on Romney and Gingrich, and perhaps more difficult since it will be based on recent occurrences not experiences from long ago. I’m for anybody but Obama, electability in the general election is the key point for the Republican nominee if the country is to be save from recess appointments and regulatory governance.

  • notpropagandized

    Yep. It’s reality.

    Can you visualize George Washington selling himself? Hah, hah! He’d have never done it. It used to be long ago in another galaxy that it was considered poor manners and bad judgment to stump for yourself. Campaigning was left to references provided by others with personal knowledge of a candidate’s character and integrity.

    But no longer. Now you have to have the same skills as a charlatan or con man (or woman) to combine with a nearly unassailable record of performance stirred-in with a fortunate media support syndicate.

    The Dem(rEP) Establishment has got us by the short ones and Obama is nailing down the power of the Ruling Class even moreso, but with his Fundamental Transformation designed to obliterate US power, exceptionalism and whatever moral standing it has left. Dictatorships around the world will prosper as a matter of design and the US Ruling Class will join the Global Community of the Ruling Class.

    Sounds like End Times, doesn’t it? And just think, it all started with saying little ol’ Rick Perry is the best of the bunch. We’re screwed.

  • notpropagandized

    Media will likely rule as it did in ’08 and won’t be caught off guard as it was in ’10. The electorate (voters) are much more squishy than politicians who have a very difficult time now trying to figure out what people want. The people get throttled by media and cannot really decide what they want and stick to it. Is it the middle independents that switch back and forth? Probably. Also, we really are getting a much larger bloc of non-Anglo Dem voters in the mix. We’re still screwed no matter if it’s Newt or Mitt. If Palin got in, she might be able to mobilize enough public opinion to her side, despite significant negatives, because of her unique ability to put a knot on the collective heads of The Media and make them look really stupid. … Naw, that woudn’t work either. We’re screwed.

  • retire05

    numbers like the federal government does, If you are unemployed in Texas, you are unemployeed. With the feds, and the national unemployment number, to keep it low they drop people who may be unemployed but no longer collect UE benefits.

    Our unemployment rate, with 1,000 people a week moving to Texas, would be a lot higher had there not been the creation of 1,340,678 jobs in Texas.

    Now, how many jobs did California or New York, with similar populations, create? How many jobs did Massachusetts create in the last 11 years, because if you don’t know, I darn sure can tell you. Mittens saw an increase of 51,362 jobs in his state as governor. During the same time period Jan.03/07, Rick saw a 727,705 increase in jobs.

    Want to tell me the Texas job record is a myth?

  • beric

    About certain issues than others. I’m happy to forgive Newt on his screwups, since he’s admitted wrongdoing/errors and moved on. Others here are much less apt to do so.

  • racetraitor

    I had an emergency C-section when our third child, Joseph, was born. They gave me Vicadin (spelling?) for the pain; and boy, did that stuff kick my butt. It totally messed with my memory. For instance, it took six weeks before I could remember the baby’s name. Often when II talked to my mother-in-law on the phone, I would refer to the baby as Michael. After I did this several times, my mother-in-law asked, “Is his name Michael or Joseph?” I said, “Joseph. Why?” “Because you keep calling him Michael.” I had no idea that I was screwing up my own kid’s name, or why I was (Michael isn’t a name my husband and I had even considered). This is just a long-winded way of saying that major surgery and pain meds can play weird tricks on the mind and on the memory.

    Go Perry!

  • racetraitor

    I live in Ingham County.

    I would like to second everything that buster93 said. I would also like to add that of all the candidates, Perry (in my opinion) is the most genuine, and has the most humility. He is a man of character, and a man who refuses to compromise on his beliefs even when compromise might be politically expedient. Of all the candidates, he’s the only one I believe we can really trust to lead this country out of the mess it’s in. He’s also the only candidate I’d trust to lead the military.

  • racetraitor

    I live in Ingham County.

    I would like to second everything that buster93 said. I would also like to add that of all the candidates, Perry (in my opinion) is the most genuine, and has the most humility. He is a man of character, and a man who refuses to compromise on his beliefs even when compromise might be politically expedient. Of all the candidates, he’s the only one I believe we can really trust to lead this country out of the mess it’s in. He’s also the only candidate I’d trust to lead the military.

  • bzip

    Pro-Perry super PAC makes anti-Mitt, anti-Newt pitch
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2011/12/properry-super-pac-makes-antimitt-antinewt-pitch-108362.html

    Newsreel (From Rick Perry?s Super PAC)
    http://youtu.be/iQcSxvdmq84

  • racetraitor

    Thanks for posting it, Lou Pat!

  • bzip

    So let me get this straight.

    You are OK with:
    Newt lying to the American people about carbon caps.
    Newt supporting GSE’s.
    Newt supporting global warming.
    Newt cheating on 2 wives.
    Newt supporting TARP.
    Newt supporting Medicare part D.
    Newt supporting mandates of all kinds.
    Newt lobbying Fannie.

    All that gets a pass since:

    Newt “HELP” pass a Federal budget with a surplus for 4 years (might I remind you that it took a president and senate and a dot com bubble to do that). And welfare reform – might I remind you it took the “HELP” of the president.

    But you are willing to forgive and forget Newt’s short comings. You are willing to by pass the “massive” amount of conservative accomplishments by Rick Perry (something so great that Newt can not nor will he ever come close to Perry’s record of accomplishments):

    In Case You Missed It: Texas Dominates List of Best-Performing Cities
    http://governor.state.tx.us/news/press-release/16802/

    1)Strongest voice on Abortion:
    Passed the sonogram bill and defunded planned parenthood in Texas. Due to legislation Perry pushed for and passed 13 abortion clinics in Texas have been shut down and more will follow.

    2)Gun Rights:
    Having the stance that there should be no laws restricting the right to bear arms. Perry signed into law Castle Law and further amended legislation to include the law extend to our vehicles and further be allowed to carry concealed without a permit while traveling with the clear and simple definition of traveling to include going to and from your home to our car and any destination thereafter.

    Perry is a CCL holder and below YouTube Video clip with response from Perry on gun control is all any conservative need to know on how he will deal with gun control. It should be very clear by anyone and everyone what a pro10th amendment rights guy Perry is, you surely can’t dispute that.
    http://youtu.be/OenAw39A0b8

    3)Taxes
    Perry has signed legislation totally 14 billion in tax cuts; among them a veto on the internet sales tax, and bills signed cutting property and franchise business taxes.

    4)Government size:
    Perry has signed into law protection against eminent domain and when alerted to the threat of land grabs from the TTC, so scuttled the program and bound by law under scorched earth mandate that the TTC shall never rise again under an name and earned him the endorsement of the highest ranking conservative in Texas, Wayne Christian

    http://texasgopvote.com/2012-presidential-election/most-conservative-state-representative-texas-endorses-rick-perry-president-expla-003248

    5)Perry has also signed into law several bills protecting Texas against EPA over-regulation and is the worst enemy of the EPA
    http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-presidential-election/perry-vs-ep-epic-illuminating-clash/

    6) Don?t forget Perry pushed for lawsuit reform and got it ? he signed into law comprehensive reforms that have made Texas a leader in the fight against lawsuit abuse. These reforms include a recent loser pay law that will cut down on frivolous lawsuits. His medical liability reforms have increased the number of physicians practicing in the state by the thousands, improving patient access to medical specialists.

    7) Protected the ?Rainy Day Fund,? which set aside at least $6 billion for future needs and a lot of people were wanting to spend that money but he would not touch it. And Perry is the only governor since World War II to reduce state general revenue spending. Perry also signed a historic property tax cut, and a tax cut for small businesses with less than $1 million in gross receipts.

    8) ID required when voting. The law, scheduled to take effect Jan. 1, bars anyone without a valid state or federal photo ID from voting.

    9) Signed a bill that prevents driver?s licenses for illegals. Additionally, he vetoed a bill that would have allowed the use of a matricula consular, which is an ID card used by the Mexican government, to get a driver?s license in Texas.

  • racetraitor

    I screw up my four kids’ names on a daily basis. I’ve even called my sons by my daughter’s name. Does that mean that I’m incompetent to raise my children?

    By the way, I am NOT comparing the American people to children that need a parent’s guidance. I am, however, saying that momentary lapses or slips of the tongue are completely irrelevant. My husband has a bachelor’s and a master’s from a Big Ten school, and a Ph.D. from a Pac 10 school. I have a math degree and a law degree from a Big 10 school. We’re not unintelligent people, and yet we both commit “gaffes” a hundred times a day, just in going about our daily duties. I shudder to think how stupid we would both look if we were on the campaign trail and scads of reporters were following us around 24/7, just waiting for us to say something dumb.

    You seem like an intelligent person; so put yourself in Perry’s shoes. You’re recovering from back surgery and and from the havoc that surgery and meds can cause wreak. You’re campaigning maybe 12 hours a day, while trying to run the second-largest state in the US, and the 13th-largest economy in the world. And everybody is gunnng for you. Are you telling me that you’d never slip up; never say something silly; never be, well, human?

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    http://legalinsurrection.com/2011/12/shock-completely-misleading-story-about-newt-saying-gays-should-vote-for-obama/

  • racetraitor

    In paragraph 3 line 2, delete one “and” and “cause.”

    This proves my point about myself and gaffes. :)

  • racetraitor

    I’m terrible at guessing games.

  • http://www.changeforrickperry.org louisianapatriette

    I’m not exactly a computer expert, so I’m inordinately proud of myself for successfully posting a video :D

  • tyman

    Because he and Biden have more than enough screw ups between them.

    I heard somewhere that Bachmann missed every single house vote in August due to the campaign. Why? Can’t she multi-task?

    Since Perry entered the race late, he’s had to fundraise, campaign, prepare for debates, be a Governor…all the while recovering from back surgery.

    I’d say he’s done a MORE than admirable job!

    Ronald Reagan supposedly had a photographic memory. I shudder to think that we would have missed out on the greatest president in my lifetime had he not had this blessing.

    I’m so sick of this “with Perry, we’re one “oops” away from Obama winning re-election”. If that’s all it takes for BO to win re-election, we’re royally screwed.

  • geoph

    Just outside Ann Arbor

    Go Blue!

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    I’ve seen comments from some here that the DMR is not a credible source, depending upon which candidate is being discussed, yet it’s used to bash Gingrich on a gotcha question no less.

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    he and his supporters like to say it is negative campaigning, but the simple fact is a negative ad does not work if there is not some truth to it. Newt likes to say he did not lobby, but that is like saying Romney does not change positions. Newt?s influence peddling is the reason I believe he is going down in the polls. People did not know the Newt that the politico’s knew. I posted the other day a few paragraphs that showed that the balanced budgets Newt is now taking credit for happen in opposition to him, and I did not get that from Bill Clinton.

    http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/9188-how-speaker-newt-gingrich-betrayed-the-republican-revolution

    Stephen Slivinski outlines the situation perfectly in the web site that I posted the link to above. I think this is part of the Newt problem, and I suspect that his poll numbers will continue to drop as people learn about him.

  • federalfarmer1

    the Media really hates Newt.

    It’s pathetic that other conservatives are so eager to tear Newt down that they repeat lies from the drivebys.

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    and Perry does really well on the stump, Ive seen him five times now, and in each case I liked what he said. He knows how to slow down to explain, when to raise his voice to give the importance of the words a chance to sink in. I think the media tries to paint our candidates as dumb or stupid, but Perry is not dumb, he is very smart.

  • circlegranch

    Whomever does his ad’s deserves some high 5′s. They keep getting better!

    bzip: can you post it here?

  • bzip

    circlegranch – I did post the ad a while back in this thread at the bottom but I’ll do it again :-) . It is a very good ad, it takes in a lot in a very short time.

    Newsreel (From Rick Perry?s Super PAC)
    http://youtu.be/iQcSxvdmq84

  • izoneguy

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    Did I get to chat with you, I had the Perry shirt and a purple button up over it, but not buttoned of course.

  • renny

    Perry can’t be the nominee of Paul and/or Newt is going to win Iowa and NH.

  • romansdaughter

    Hidalgo was a mustang that entered a long distance race with his owner Frank Hopkins over in the Middle East. All the other horses were Arabian and full blooded and everyone was sure that the mustang could not do it but he ended up winning after a very grueling.long distance race. It is perfect.

  • superpatriot

    Which conservative candidate the majority of evangelical christians in Iowa are going to support??

  • racetraitor

    Now I live in Spartan territory. Ugh! I’ll still cheer for them in their bowl game, though (gotta be loyal to the Conference, no?).

  • racetraitor

    This is coming from someone whose kids have to retrieve her voicemails off her cell phone! :) I’m NOT a machine person.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Not sure if you’re being a little facetious. But, I think the answer is no.
    From everything I am reading, they are not coalescing around one candidate and their votes are split four ways (including Newt.) And at the rate we’re going, this is going to be a long, drawn-out race.

  • superpatriot

    They mainly all backed Huckabee in ’08, which led to his win.

    I know this group is definitely anti-Romney and anti-Obama, so I don’t think they are going to split the vote 4 ways and let Romney win.

    Cheers.

  • clowngirl

    What separates a pundit from other media types? Who is considered a pundit anyway?

    For e.g. Charles Krauthammer is a syndicated columnist and a contributor for Fox News. Is he also considered a pundit? If so, are there other syndicated columnists and news show contributors who aren’t pundits?

  • circlegranch

    my eyesight is failing and I miss quite a bit. thanks again.

    These ads are awesome. I keep thinking if we all really like them, surely folks in IA and SC do too. They are fresh, concise and to the point, entertaining as well as informative, always a little twist or surprise. What’s not to like?

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    Yea, Yea, Yea, because Newt is not falling, and the last poll did not show Perry in 3rd moving upand things do not often change after Iowa. I get it, you are GOd and you tell us what will happen.

    I will not be told to vote for Newt because I have no other choice but Romney. That is the biggest Lie Ive ever heard.

  • lizzie

    I loved it except, when did Rick Perry decide to go with the black ninja-shirt :)

    really want to know where this lovely location is – I try to NOT watch Obama on the news, but caught a glimpse of him maybe walking to Marine One, and the trees in the background were very much like the trees in all these Perry ads.

    subliminal ad cues. very expert.

    btw, ABC news is giving Perry some positive coverage despite the current Mitt-Newt-Ron pile-on-with-Bachmann-circling.

    and no one can break through the coverage of North Korea and another DC failure to perform. How can anyone think the House is making Obama and the Senate look good?

  • rkcurtin

    margins.

    Where do you live? Outside the US?

    I work with mostly Democrats (about 700 of them) and it is hard to find anyone to stick up for B-O, say he is doing a good job, or is just a good guy working hard in tough times.

    The young are disillusioned with B-O. They have moved in their lack of political experience and wisdom to space cadette Ron Paul.

    Hell, even me, just a unknown RR engineer has a good shot at defeating B-O because I can show how to get to a better future than THE OCCUPANT OF THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES.

  • greyeagle

    are heavily tied in with FOX news. Apparently, the FOX news analysts have their orders. They DO NOT give any positive support for Perry. Why is this? I am puzzled. However, I will NOT watch anymore FOX news programs. Chris Wallace is the most vicious of the bunch.

  • greyeagle

    I am from TX and these attacks on Perry are simply baseless. The very ugly articles by Geller and Spencer regarding the Islamic lesson was at a very liberal school district. None have shown up in any of the other school districts. The Aga Khan is the brother of Rita Hayworth’s daughter Yasmin and is secular. He and his wife have worked with Perry on charities in TX. The Aga Khan and his wife also have been involved in Israel with numerous charities. Maybe Geller is not aware of this information. A lot of personal attacks that have been made on Perry on other web sites appear to have been made by supporters of other GOP candidates. I say this because these individuals would eventually mention who they supported. Thank you Dr. Sklaroff for bringing some of this out in the open.

  • lizzie

    did not even vote in 2008. Bush Derangement Syndrome is an affliction of the kneejerk liberals. Many of us register as dems because we used to think we would have primaries, but the machine dems decided to stop that after 2002.

    New York voters are self-identified as:
    49% Catholic (Irish and German and Italian descent, and those dems stayed home in 2008, especially the Irish)
    13% Jewish (and I bet half are NOT liberal based on the not-covered-by-any-media contentious congressional contests on Long Island in 2010, and that McCain won Nassau and Rockland Counties in 2008. Reagan won NY in 1980)
    19% Evangelical, and I bet Perry could fill Yankee Stadium with the Evangelical Hispanics who live in The Bronx.

    All you have to do is show up and campaign!

    The only state I know Obama will win for sure in 2012 is Vermont (yes, Calvin Coolidge is having a serious talk with Harry Truman about rising from their respective graves for 2012 :) ).
    Even Massachusetts is going to be interesting because the Scott Brown v Elizabeth Warren Senate contest will drive turnout.

    Connecticut and New York both have Senate contests – and maybe New Jersey as well.

  • greyeagle

    I am from TX and moved to Central Florida the middle of last year to be near family. There are several in my family that will be voting for Rick Perry.

  • greyeagle

    is nothing like George Bush other than they live in TX. Why do people like TX? Family oriented, the majority of people are religious, like to hunt, fish, camp, very friendly in most parts of the state, lots of jobs, low cost of living, excellent medical care and lots of conservatives.

  • greyeagle

    Perry had back surgery about a month prior to entering the race. Then in the debates, he had to stand about 2 hours each time. I can tell you from experience that you will have horrible muscle spams and will be unable to stand 2 hours comfortably for at least 6 moths. I could certainly tell he was in pain in the first 4 debates. As a medical professional, I will tell you that severe pain and or medication will affect your concentration and memory.

  • buster93

    Good way to put this about Rick Perry. Also Perry is like a classic Mustang car it improves with age and all the young drivers will think he’s cool.

  • buster93

    Watching the other day and Fox listed all the candidates no mention of Perry. I think they have gotten their orders not to smile when interviewing Perry. Oh yeah aren’t taxes going up in New York ?
    The way they speak of Romney like he’s royality pretty lame. This whole election cycle and the debates has been like a Dancing with the canididates and so lame. Go Perry thanks for standing firm on the issues and not checking the darn pulse of the polls every second.
    Boo hoo Fox I watch all the cable news now. Good for competition !!!
    When I voted for Reagan is 1980 it was CNN 24 -7.
    Oh yeah thanks for not throwing softballs during Romneys interview Brett Baier. He was irritated and uncomfortable good. It’s like the liberal media with Obama . Let’s play T-ball ?. GIVE THE TOUGH QUESTIONS TO PERRY HE CAN TAKE IT AND KNOCK IT OUT OF THE PARK HE’S PLAYED IN THE BIG LEAGUE FOR 11 YEARS. RICK P2012

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    You’re free to keep spreading that lie if you want, but it makes it hard to take the high road on character when you do.

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    Which part of West Florida are you from? I’ll be voting absentee this year for Hillsborough county myself.

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    That sounds wonderful :)

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    I will be voting myself absentee–nice to see some voting in person. I’m rather impatient for my ballot to arrive :D .

  • kegan05

    And will remain so through the 2012 Primary Election. I still think he is the only person with ample experience to beat Comrade Obozo. Rick Perry has worked at securing his 1200 mile border with Mexico for almost 12 years, without any help from the idiots in the WH. He has signed Tort Reform into law. His state has balanced their budget for the past several years, he has help create over a million new jobs for Texas. All he has to do is put his record up against Comrade Obozo’s. It’s a no brainer.

    Perry – 2012

  • axistogrind

    tier in the last debate by the Fox moderators, getting mostly sidelined due to his fall in the polls. It was unfortunate. He needed to wade into that debate like a prize bull, but pretty much stuck to answering his questions in a vacuum and didn’t mix it up with other candidates. He was good, but he didn’t really exhibit the force of personality that was necessary to make a splash. I kept waiting for it, and it just never happened. I am distressed because he should be one of the last few standing for Americans to choose from.

    I hope that Iowans figure out that Ron Paul is a charlatan as a republican. He has some ideas that I can work with, but there is a whole lot of crazy going on that is not compatible with good governance. He should not be collecting 20% of the vote. Iowa, if you vote for him, you deserve to lose your caucuses. I will never pay attention to you again. Plus he is 76 years old! He’ll never make it through the first term, given how it ages a prez. Think about that for a second. There will be no second term.

  • kegan05

    I can tell you as a person who had a Hip replacement surgery and who has a bad back as well, there is no way I would be able to stand for even one hour today, several months after my surgery. Standing in one position for an extended period of time brings on the worst pain possible. Perry entered the race long before he was physically ready, IMO. He seems to be a lot better today but it might be too late. I sincerely hope not. He is a good, honest man who will do what he says he will do. He has very good experience and has been reelected 3 times. If I know anything about Texas, I know the people there would not reelect Perry unless he was doing a great job. I hope he has a chance to prove himself to the American people. He is the real deal.

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    …and in case you haven’t noticed he has been doing a lot better in polls as Newt has come down and as the negative press has gotten started on Ron Paul.

  • lizzie

    mil (I think) who watched Fox debate on Dec 15. Perry was better on Dec 10, and got more time because there were six on the stage – Huntsman was added to make it seven on Dec 15.

    Plus, will we ever know how many people watched the Dec 3 Huckabee Forum, including the repeats? I noticed that was when Perry’s Facebook numbers started jumping again, but have no idea how many people (like me) do not do Facebook.

    Some of the media is really enjoying Perry::
    “…The first leg of Perry?s bus tour wraps up Thursday, but the Texas governor?s foray into retail politics has allowed him to engage in the up-close contact Iowa voters crave, a part of campaigning at which Perry excels. …”

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/prone-to-mistakes-rick-perry-prays-he-wont-trip-up/

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/campaign-laurels-the-iowa-bus-race-for-third-place/

    “…For her speed-racer style with her eye on the prize of reaching all 99 counties, we award Bachmann the Badge of the Drive-By Campaigner.

    …For his steadiness and crowd-friendly manner, Perry gets the Standing-Room-Only Medal.

    …For his persistent jog at the back of the pack, the Tortoise Trophy is given to Santorum.

    …For his better-late-than-never decision, Romney is awarded the, umm, Better Late Than Never Plaque.”

    my postscript:, wishing everyone a Merry Christmas and another six Happy Chanukahs, with this final note (Politico has the detailed schedule, not Perry2012):

    The second leg of the Perry Iowa bus tour resumes Dec. 27 and continues until January 2, closing with a campaign rally in time for the evening news,
    in (drumroll) …Perry, Iowa.

    ok, I confess to sneaking a look at the ABC Note blog on Romney ordering Hawaiian pizza with olives, in New Hampshire, and I am really trying to NOT think about pineapple and ham ruining a perfectly ok olive pizza, or the image of Romney handing out free sandwiches and pizza to the crowd. And, unlike Rick Perry, Romney will not allow reporters on his bus.

  • texashistorian

    to me is a political commentator; someone who makes their living doing that in whatever forum. Krauthammer would be a pundit. To use a Fox example, Shepherd Smith would not be considered a pundit. O’Reilly is a pundit. That’s my take on it anyway.

    And I kind of hate the word, too!

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    a fraud, and yes who does not know about welfare reform and balanced budgets that he really fought gainst. Newt is a middle moderate Republican, he always has been, but when he knows that he needs to act like a conservative he starts to do it. He once called us hateful and he reaaly laid into some of his own members in the house because they voted to keep eliments of his own contract for America, he relly got mad because 11 people stayed true to why they got sent to congress and voted agaisnt Newts budget that would have raised the the debt. Newt wanted to spend on stuff he was going to benifit from. That is why I as a Perry supporter goes after Newt, because I am sick of this insider candidates some how makin gpeople look past their endless twisting and somehow they manage to gain power. Everyone knows that politicians are slick talking liars, but still people get behind them. It is just plain nuts.

  • JSobieski

    Huge talk, no accomplishments

    Big promises, no plans.

    Bachmann is weakest on issues like Medicare reform, but biggest on bravado when it comes to budget issues.

    What is Bachmann’s plan for Medicare reform?
    Reducing waste, fraud, and abuse—i.e. the Obama plan.

  • romansdaughter

    I am sure that they do. The media did it with Reagan, Bush etc. This is one of their main forms of attack…that a candidate is dumb. And the LSM ignores completely all the dumb things that Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi say all the time. Well one thing they need to ask themselves who is “dumb” on creating jobs in this country?

  • beach91

    in Pasco county. I usually vote absentee too but I may head to the polls this season.

  • bzip

    A nice exchange with Rick Perry on Fracking Myths

    Rick Perry takes on fracking myths
    http://www.therightscoop.com/rick-perry-takes-on-fracking-myths/

    Rick Perry on Fracking Myth
    http://youtu.be/mw2a2xQz3TU

  • geoph

    I’m all for it, unless it involves Ohio State! (darn 10 plus years cheaters with a wink and nod from the NCAA with sanctions, not that it would have improved the never to be spoken of again RichRod era, or error rather, but some of those three-loss-Lloyd seasons would have differed and we’d have played for at least one more National title…grumble, grumble, grumble)

    We don’t shun Sparty in our home either, my wife went to Med School there.

    BTW did you hear they had to cancel the Nativity play again at OSU?
    They still can’t find three wise men or a virgin! Ba-dum-dum. Ok, it’s old.

  • jaykali

    And I don’t hate them personally but I don’t like Bachmann or Paul for different reasons. And I don’t even mind Paul so much as everyone knows he’s not a legitimate candidate but I like libertarian views getting out there bc I do believe there will be a libertarian leaning candidate that will eventually rise to prominence.

    I don’t like Bachmann bc I think she’s completely phony. She doesn’t have any sort of real experience other than being 1 of 500 in the house. If we are going to elect someone from the house it would be someone with a position of leadership in the house. She has no legislative accomplishments to speak of and isn’t a thought leader like Paul Ryan. It’s just not very common for presidents to come from the house.

  • remalimo

    There was a lease with 5 wells that had been drilled and produced. Two of the wells were still producing and three of the wells had been left unplugged. I reentered one of the wells to see if anything could have done to get production from the well my workover was not successful. I then was notifiied a few months later to plug the well within 30 days or shutin the producing wells. I proceeded to find a plugging company and was able to find one (I had filed the W-3) but was not able to accomplish all of this to satisfy the RRC. Then received a letter explaining to me that if I did not shut-in the production the RRC would charge me $10,000.00/D for each production. I then shut-in the wells and called an attorney to engage him to rep. me at the RRC, he indicated that you use to get action from the commission but now days they are non sympatethic to the operator. I then received a letter from a 2.5% royalty owner who esplained that I had shut-in the wells for over 30 days (per lease clause) and therefore would have to relinquish the wells. I explained that I had plans to continue to produce the wells. The Royalty owner then notified the RRC where they explained to him that if he registered a complaint then either the RRC would plug the well and charge me for the plugging or I would have plug the wells. The company that I had contracted to plug the 3 wells then plugged all 5 wells within a year. During the year I then had my lawyer try to reason with the 2.5% royalty owner to make a deal but he was not interested in making a deal for he owned some of the production on the next lease and he therefore did not want me to produce the reserves. I had a study done where the lease was a good subject to instigate water flooding. I also appealed to the commission but they referred me to an existing case where and other oil company had been ruled to loose the lease under some of the same conditions.

  • texashistorian

    for the reply- It sounds like you got sucked into the hellish bureaucracy that exists when government gets bigger than it needs to be- yes, even in Texas. The RRC has a bit too much power IMO, but we’d need to get yet ANOTHER amendment to fix that and I don’t see it happening. The RRC are too well-connected.

    I am not sure it’s Perry’s fault, though. The Bill passed the house 144-0 with 6 abstentions. A veto could never have happened. Your situation sucks, my friend, and I fell for you- it sounds as if it never should have happened that way, but is that reason enough to ditch Perry for you?