« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Sweet Meteor of Death 2012

As I said back in December, I have no plans to endorse a candidate for President of the United States. I wrote, at the time, “I would prefer instead to tell you exactly what I think about each of the candidates, good or bad, and let the chips fall where they may.”

Since then, I have routinely been asked who I would endorse. Today, after a lot of reflection on this race, I can honestly say my position has not changed and I would honestly prefer Ace of Spades’ sweet meteor of death than any of the candidates left in the race. Only the sweet meteor of death seems capable of stopping both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. I can take the easy way out and not endorse because while I recognize politics necessitates compromise, I would have to compromise my intellectual honesty too much to choose any of the remaining candidates. Tonight, on my radio show, I put my weight behind the sweet meteor of death. You can listen to my reasons why here.

The Republican Party is putting itself in the hands of the economy. With Mitt Romney as the nominee, we will be forced to hope for a deteriorating economy because, while I will vote for him and think he is vastly better than Barack Obama, the fact is he has made no case for himself against Barack Obama except that he can do a better job on the economy. And let’s be clear — no Republican should hope or appear to be hoping for a deteriorating economy. It’s just that with no other justification for his election other than electability based on the ability to fix the economy, if the economy fixes itself, suddenly there is no justification for Mitt Romney’s electability.

My sincere and honest hope is that both Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich stay in the race as long as possible to deny MItt Romney enough delegates to secure the Republican nomination. I do not think either Santorum or Gingrich have much of a better shot against Barack Obama, but I do think they are at least running on bigger ideas than Mitt Romney — ideas that still translate and survive an improving economy.

For months I have said I am for “Not Romney.” It is not because I think either Gingrich or Santorum have a better shot at winning than Romney, but because I still hold out hope for a broker convention to save us from ourselves.

I may be a Republican, and at one time an elected Republican, but I have always needed more than just a letter of the alphabet next to someone’s name to get me excited. Newt Gingrich excites because he picks fights with all the people I think need to be fought, including Mitt Romney. God bless him for that. But I am under no illusion that makes him capable of beating Barack Obama without a deteriorating economy.

Rick Santorum excites me because, while I think he is a big government and compassionate conservative, he is willing to defend traditional mores in this country in a way few are. HIs bold stand for faith and tradition is honest and refreshing, but it also makes for a massive liability in a general election when he has so little to show voters on other fronts.

As for Romney, he does not excite me and has largely run his campaign making sure conservatives know he can get the nomination without them. That’s all well and good, but he certainly should not expect me or other conservatives to do anything for him in the general election other than, hopefully it won’t just be me, showing up to vote for him. That’s about all I plan to do for the man.

I’ll support the Republican nominee for President. I’ll defend him from meritless attacks and I will oppose Barack Obama. Any one of our candidates is better than Barack Obama. But God help us if any one of them is the nominee.

Until we reach the magic number 1144, which is the number of delegates needed to secure the Republican nomination, I hold out hope that someone or some meteor saves us from ourselves.

COMMENTS

  • traversecityconservative

    “The Republican Party is putting itself in the hands of the economy.” And that is exactly the problem. We need a well-rounded candidate because Obama and the media are totally going to lie about the state of the economy. That is why we need someone HARD HITTING on Obamacare, Fast & Furious, illegal immigration and rest of the crap that goes on EVERY DAY. We’re losing our freedoms through administrative decree and a total trampling of the Constitution. None of the candidates get it. It’s pretty sad when the electorate is more passionate and knowledgeable than the candidates they have to choose from.

  • benko

  • johnconradarens

    Sadly, a “brokered convention” would be brokered by—

    Establishment, hold-onto-graft-as-long-as-possible Republicans, who have ZERO interest is changing the status quo ante, and don’t think this election is that big a shake…

    And thus ended the republic…

  • JimmyGee

    Why I have been throwing up so much of late. Lord knows my toilet needs a rest. It all starts the same way each time, I wonder how, how we got such a crappy field of mush…then I feel the bile build up, then it’s off to see the the porcelain god to make another donation to the GOP establishment.

  • goodgovernance

    This diary encapsulates how I feel about the various candidates exactly. I may actually dislike Romney a bit more than you, it goes beyond a lack of excitement. But I worry about the GOP’s and the conservative movement’s future with Willard as our standard bearer.

    The point about Mitt (and to a lesser extent, all the other GOP candidates) relying on a weak economy in the general is also very valid. Mitt has no case if the economy is perceived by the public to be rebounding, even if the truth is it should be better than it will be.

    Finally, there’s always a chance a non-economic issue rises to the fore at the height of the general election campaign. Israel could well attack Iran before November. The president will have to make some tough calls if that happens. Romney’s lack of foreign policy experience will be highlighted and then being known primarily as just a business manager could turn into a liability, not an asset.

    Stranger things have happened in politics at the national level.

  • kipling

    “As for Romney, he does not excite me and has largely run his campaign making sure conservatives know he can get the nomination without them. That?s all well and good, but he certainly should not expect me or other conservatives to do anything for him in the general election other than, hopefully it won?t just be me, showing up to vote for him. That?s about all I plan to do for the man.”

    That is about all I can promise as well. Romney is too far of a stretch for me to actively campaign for and keep my intellectual and ideological integrity.

    We need to make sure that he is never considered to be the “conservative candidate.” We must not redefine conservatism to fit Mitt Romney.

  • pmb88

    To me Romney does not espouse conservatism with passion while the other candidates have. When Romney tries to espouse it I get the feeling he’s faking it or trying too hard. What irks me is that the establishment says Romney is the best candidate but when I look at his record it just reminds me somewhat of Obama and I feel like we are screwed if we elect Romney as the nominee.

  • JimmyGee

    There is one other wild-card that has the money, and the organization to run even at this late stage….call me crazy, Sarah Palin. I’ll go put on my foil hat now….

  • Remington_Steele

    Cain’s first endorsement was better than the “Sweet Meteor of Death”. Sounds like you’re hoping for ‘we the people’ just like Cain: ‘a broker convention to save us from ourselves.’

    I like to have fun with the Mayan Calendar. Maybe their calendar denoted a change of eras based on the Sweet Meteor of Death coming to visit. Or maybe, the calendar denotes a change of eras based on the GOP winning the Presidency after such a miserable era of Obama. I choose the later even if that’s with an undesirable GOP president.

  • JimmyGee

    Romney is not, never has been, a CONSERVATIVE! Period. Everything he has done when he was in office was forwarding a progressive, liberal agenda. As you have said, he is just a bit right of Obama. Obama lite! I am convinced to my soul that if Mitt wins the election he will not get rid of Obamacare, just “tweak” it!

  • libertus

    I am still shaking my head how after 3 years of tea party excitement, this is where we are.

    The best chance for a brokered convention is for conservatives to get behind Newt. He is not the answer as a nominee, but he is the key to keeping Romney below the delegate threshold. Paul will maintain his 15% and if Newt can win some Super Tuesday States (especially Georgia and Texas) and otherwise stay 35%, that will keep Romney from getting the delegates. Another key is for non-Romney backers to vote for Paul in Virginia and give him a good showing or potentially beating Romney there.

    The next few months must be about spreading out the delegates and preventing anyone from getting a majority.

    And what will happen in a brokered convention? Who knows. But it can’t be worse than what will happen if we don’t have one.

  • snowshooze

    And we citizens are left adrift with a choice between the devil or the deep blue sea.
    We have lost our voice and our power. Democrats have lost even more than Republicans, but the entire spectrum has shifted extremely to the left.
    We are all in the same boat to a degree… we are governed without representation.
    Oh yes.. we have out representatives… but they represent only themselves as we have seen time and again.
    Our entire culture has been brainwashed and broken by the establishment machines, the Main Stream Media and special interest’s.
    There is in fact a supressed uprising, however, it is never spoken of. It is one of the regular guy… the man on the street, the average Joe.
    The two parties insist in continuing down their respective roads to ruin. Tey are locked in a power struggle for control, for the sake of control. All else are merely details to them. The only questions they may have is how to package and sell their power structure to the best effect. There are two views on this, one bad, the other worse. Both have their respective selling points.
    My Dad claimed that nobody that wasn’t a Vet should have the right to vote. I read an opinion somewhere’s that only land-owners should have the right to vote.
    Right now, I think either one would be better than what we have where there are danged few of either.
    But it all goes back to representation. We are not representeted.
    Ok, we are, but NOT sincerely. We are constantly and consistantly sold out. Both Democrats and Republicans alike.
    I have to throw in here, and pray for a brokered convention.
    Anything is better than what we have now, so long as it is different.
    The way my luck runs, we’d get our brokered convention, and Romney would buy it out.

  • libertus

    We don’t know what would happen with a brokered convention, but it couldn’t be worse than what will happen if we don’t have a brokered convention.

  • pmb88

    The establishment needs the base to support him but the base are suspicious of Romney and do not have much enthusiasm voting for him. There are two scenarios to this. Scenario one is if the establishment decide on Romney and add a conservative as a veep. I do not know if this would work because it was tried before with McCain/Palin but that did not work. Scenario two is if they decide on a candidate who energizes the base to go out and vote for them.

  • pmb88

    That he would repeal Obamacare, I do not believe.

  • Wiseman

    Romney will be the nominee, and believe it or not, there are people out there that are excited about him facing off with Obama. My question is who you Redstater’s would be excited about as the VP candidate? Please no Palin responses, not going to happen. What say you Redstate?

  • pmb88

    If either dropped out Romney would invest all his resources destroying that candidate and they would have no chance. Also Romney would have to defend himself from two fronts.

    There would be a last chance to pick a nominee that is not Romney.

  • JimmyGee

    Sorry, neither has the money and most importantly the ground forces to last until super-Tuesday, much less the convention. I just don’t see it. I fear the Romney has it pretty much locked up NOW! It sickens me. I need to go throw up now…again…

  • JimmyGee

    And lets not forget a orange spray on tan

  • redcal

    Romney or Obama, we have already lost. If Obama wins, well, you know. If Romney wins, he discredits the right while abandoning it. In no case will we have any sort of voice.

    Rather than compromising by supporting Romney, it’s time to think about 2016.

    We have Romney because we accepted McCain in 2008. And only because of that. If we had rejected McCain in favor of Huckabee (or anyone else), the Mitch Daniels and Chris Christies would have looked to 2008 and seen a chance for them to win in 2012. Instead, they see a move away from the base and towards the establishment, one that prefers a crypto-centrist over a conservative.

    If we support Romney in 2012, we will be laying the tracks for the exact same thing to happen in 2016 (after Romney loses, which he will; he’s already down 4-6 in national polls against Obama, who hasn’t begun ads or a coordinated anti-Romney attack yet).

    2012 is lost. Make 2016 better now, or never. We already screwed this up by our actions in 2008. But, as the saying goes, the best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is today.

  • goodgovernance

    It ain’t over till it’s over. Eleven forty-four or fight!!

  • redcal

    Makes a perfect team mate for the Tin Man…..

  • katem

    since Jon Huntsman withdrew from it. He should have been the candidate to unite both the base and the party “establishment”. Every candidate has strengths and weaknesses and every campaign makes mistakes. As Erick’s post shows, none of the candidates will appeal to the base on 100% of the issues. But Huntsman really was the best we had — executive experience combined with hands-on foreign policy experience, a strong conservative economic record and an ability to attract independents and conservative Democrats in the general election.

    We’re left with a very weak field and I agree that it will be difficult for Romney (the strongest one left) to defeat Obama. My hope is that, if Obama is reelected, our party takes some important lessons from this campaign into the 2016 race.

  • JimmyGee

    Sweet Meteor of Death….but if you must have names…
    Mitch McConnell
    John Boehne
    Eric Cantor
    Olympia Snowe
    John McCain

  • buster93

    Lets see Obama is now checking the pulse on the economy and marveling at his improvements.Also removing the Americans out of Syria. Doing his homework will it work ? If the economy will some how improve and the housing markets improve who knows?
    I agree with Erik!
    I am truly a Ronald Reagan conservative, Americans were strong in
    every way!!
    Brokered convention ?

  • thurman

    Too much emphasis/drama/whining is being focused on this primary and it’s only early Feb.

    My two preferred candidates are out of the race. I have serious reservations about all the the 4 left but that’s life.

    But whoever wins will get my steadfast support.

    But we can still make a massive difference supporting conservatives in what will be a bloody hand to hand fight to regain the Senate and hold a big majority in the House for 2012, regardless of who POTUS is.

    There’s still plenty of work to do. I for one am still optimistic that whoever wins the nom will beat Obama.

    But all is for naught if we don’t hold the House and take all the Senate seats we should be earning back this cycle.

    Time to refocus.

  • goodgovernance

    I would have thought that as time went on I’d get over Huntsman getting out. But if anything I feel worse. At the time he dropped out I kind of expected it might be on the horizon, because Mitt looked inevitable if he clinched South Carolina.

    Now I just wish Huntsman could have found a way to hang in there. I know the money basically dried up so maybe it was impossible. But like you said, he’s exactly the unity candidate this party needs. Acceptable to the Establishment, and I dare say after getting a close look at Romney, I think Huntsman would finally be acceptable to the base, given his actual conservative record.

    After South Carolina happened, I got a nice letter from Huntsman’s campaign thanking me for a contribution. Really made me think about what could have been.

    Completely agree that should 2016 present the opportunity, we Republicans need to learn the lessons of this go-around.

  • haners

    He promised he was going to release them two weeks, and then a week ago….

  • annas

    has actually jumped the shark!

  • buster93

    Don’t throw up just stand firm in your beliefs of Conservative principles . Those Patriots are out there as you are !!!
    Just have some Gold stashed somewhere and get to know people that have fought in WWII and lived thru the depression.
    Yep I don’t care for Romney and I think if he tried to tell me he is a Conservative I would have to remind him no you a Moderate Republican . Gosh maybe he could turn things around like the Olympics?
    I still have a hard time voting for someone who STRAPS the FAMILY DOG ON THE ROOF OF THE CAR. You put the dog in the car with all the kids.

  • katem

    is something I’ve been thinking about a lot too regarding Huntsman. It’s a shame. I also feel worse about him being out of this race as more time goes by — his absence is noticeable in every debate since NH. He was head and shoulders above Romney as a presidential candidate. I hope Huntsman will run again in 2016 if our nominee doesn’t win this time.

    I keep hearing people say that Chris Christie (who hasn’t even completed a single term as governor) and Rubio (too young and still at the beginning of a Senate term) should have run this time. No, I don’t think so. Like Obama was in 2008, these potential candidates are too inexperienced this year, even for VP in my opinion. Daniels, Thune, Jindal and anyone else — once they get into a presidential contest, voters will find that they are not perfect either. The big lesson that I hope we take from this election cycle is that no candidate is perfect and will please the base 100% of the time.

  • libertus

    I am with you in that Conservatives have lost the WH in 2012 no matter who wins. But we can focus our efforts and our resources on electing a Senate majority — and let’s put pressure on a change in House and Senate leadership.

    Let’s focus on Congress instead of the WH.

  • krish

    It is time to fight & make sure that Romney is NOT the nominee! I would like to see Rick Santorum withdraw & support Newt – if that does not work out, I agree a brokered convention is the best option!

    We have been repeatedly told how conservative should pull the lever for the Republicans – most of us have done it. Heard the same words – if the republican is not elected, the country wiill be in a deep hole – this is the time of great peril for the country! We all believed & put a “compassionate conservative aka fiscally liberal” GW Bush…we had second biggest financial disaster that this country has seen. Conservative pundits kept their mouth shut then & now they are talking as if they are deficit hawks! Same things were said for McCain,Dole, HW Bush!
    With respect to Romney, I am hearing the same old words & dire consequences! Nobody wants to talk about his record & his idea of campaign is to destroy his opponets! This guy will make GW Bush look like a solid conservative!
    He is from Wall Street & has gotten millions in campaign donations from Wall Street. The result will be more TARPS to bail out the millionaires & billionaires in Wall Street! Campaign contributions are an investment & Wall Street barons will want a return 10 -20 times their investment!
    Conservative hopefully will wake up & Not buy this crap of “dire situation’ predictions” & vote their conscience. Erick, do not cave in & stand on your principles. It is better for the country to hit rock bottom so that there is a chance for conservatives to take over of the government & change the course! Electing MA Liberal Republican will delay or even destroy the possibility of electing a constitutional conservative for Presidency in the near future.

  • clintonformccain

    … that the conservative wing of the Republican party failed to field a plausible credible candidate. Honestly, I’m no sure that there even is a viable conservative wing of the party right now. Shocking, I know. But, the conservative faction is really in tatters and is pretty much sidelined in the nomination fight at this point.

    BTW, I think Romney would have been more than happy to pander to the conservatives if he had been forced to. He’s probably as surprised as anyone with the way things have unfolded.

  • kipling

    Who he plans to tap for HHS and the EPA will tell us a lot about Romney and the way he will govern.

    He can simply ignore a VP so conservatives should not be bought off by a VP pick.

  • haners

    People are taking it out on Romney for what was a complete punt on the part of the Tea Party to hoist a viable candidate of their own. Be glad that there at least is a Romney or Newt to hold the floor, or you’re left with someone like Cain.

  • Finrod

    Mitt Romney is counting on unenthusiastic Republicans sitting on their hands and letting him have the nomination by default. Just look at how in every state where Romney has won, turnout has been less than in 2008.

    As much as you might dislike the not-Romney options remaining, to not support one of them is effectively voting for Romney.

  • acat

    You know, the same former Senator who lost* to Stuart Smalley and who gave away the secret that Team Willard think we’re stuck with Obamacare so should just make the best of it.

    You are very right that personnel is politics, and given Romney’s past choices for State campaign chairs (Bolling in VA this cycle, and Kjellander in Illinois in the 2008 cycle) it’s pretty obvious he’s not looking for ideological conservatism so much as ability to tilt the field his way.

    Mew

    * Not figuring out that the Dems would try to steal the recount is losing in my book.

  • cynic19006

    And watch Obama appoint two more overweight left-wing lesbians to make law for the next 40 years.

  • cynic19006

    Seriously??

  • puritand71

    We complain when our “top-tier” candidates do not throw their hats in the ring or give up to earlier. Yet, why not support a flawed conservative candidate? Where is the backbone, the desire to defeat the Left.

    We all know it is not Romney, so support one of the others.

    Not knowing what we get in a brokered convention is better than a Santorum candidacy, really? It is like getting a Constitutional Convention. Yet, we all know how dangerous that is. It will be the same thing with a brokered convention. Let’s just drop the foolish idea and support the best conservative candidate in the field.

  • kipling

    If the rumor is confirmed, Coleman will either have to walk back those comments or seriously damage Romney further among conservatives.

    Coleman is about as politically astute as a cement block.

    Do you ever sleep? Well, I have to so if time allows I may see you tomorrow.

  • cynic19006

    will appoint judges like Roberts and Alito instead of judges like Sotomayor and kagan

    Will grant every state a waiver on Obamacare

    will actually enforce the law on immigration, instead of Hispanderers like Obama and Gingrich

    will end Obama’s war on the Catholic church

    etc. You don’t have to “believe” Romney. You can support Pelosi’s couch buddy Gingrich or pro-violent felons voting rights (how the heck does THAT help Republicans??) Santorum. You can stay home, you can complain, you can whine about no “real conservative” in the race.

    Or you can realize that your complaining will usher in four more years of Obama, a man so left-wing and out of the mainstream his second term will be ten times worse than the first. Don’t you want to take the country back? Don’t you want to see Obama out of the white house in nine months? It can be done. All it takes is a united Republican party. Sure, maybe Romney isn’t as conservative as you’d like. Is Gingrich, who supported a FEDERAL health care mandate and called Paul Ryan’s plan “right-wing engineering”? Is Santorum, who pandered to unions? Nobody’s perfect. But Romney’s the best one to take out Obama. And that’s all that matters. Taking out Obama.

    First, we need to take out Newt Gingrich, whose egotrip and vendetta against our likely nominee, as well as his complete lack of class or dignity as a person, is causing everyone’s negatives to rise. I’ve never seen a presidential candidate with so little grace as to never even congratulate the winner after primaries. He’s scum, and by the way is far from conservative, either personally or politically. It’s not 1994 anymore. Open up your eyes.

    if we lose this election, Gingrich and his supporters are mostly to blame.

  • cynic19006

    name me the issue where he hasn’t been conservative.

  • puritand71

    Right, Romney nominating conserv. judges. How can a person who cannot defend or speak well of the Conservative Philosophy be able to appoint Conservative judges.

    Mittens could not tell who a conservative is if one was to smack him silly. All that is needed is for a few senators to stand up to Romney and he will wilt just as he did in Mass. The man is worse than a squid.

  • jamesm

    i will not vote for Romney in the primary. No way. I honestly feel that if he is the nominee it’s over and Obama wins. Gingrich or Santorum would have a better chance. Gingrich inspires me but Santorum doesn’t. I can imagine the clips of Romney and his “very poor”comment being played on televisions across Ameriica. He will be portrayed as an out of touch elite when the average person may be hurting.

  • cynic19006

    I’m guessing he won’t have that as President to deal with. but even with that, he did what he could to prevent gay marriage and stem cell research.

    He will appoint conservative judges because he has to. because his voters will mandate it and if he strays, we’ll desert him. He was faking the liberalism in Mass anyway. it’s pretty obvious.

  • demsaresatanic

    “will appoint judges like Roberts and Alito instead of judges like Sotomayor and kagan (sic);” sure, just like he did in Mass. when he appointed lib judges.

    “Will grant every state a waiver on Obamacare,” sure, just like he gave Mass. a waiver on Romneycare.

    “Will actually enforce the law on immigration, instead of Hispanderers like Obama and Gingrich,” sure, that’s why Mass. doesn’t require the use of E-verify.

    “Will end Obama?s war on the Catholic church, ” sure, that’s why Romneycare pays for abortion and ran the Catholic Church out of providing adoption services.

    “You don?t have to ?believe? Romney;” you are right about something, those are a few reasons why I don’t believe Romney.

    Your bs promises are sooo Romney.

  • Martin Knight

    … that John Weaver’s theory that you can win votes with disdain and contempt was a steaming pile of bull$#!t.

    Too bad.

  • grimeska

    You supported the dimwitted Rick Perry, who used to be a Democrat BTW, but you cannot find it in your ‘intellectual honesty’ to be supportive of any of the other candidates running…lol? Really? Does intellect have anything to do with it? You do realize that Rick Perry probably has the IQ of an artichoke, right? Anyone who still supported him after he showed his deficiencies in the intellectual department might also have a few IQ points missing.
    I don’t think any of the remaining candidates will lose sleep over not having your endorsement. You can continue to shill for CNN and yuck it up with your liberal commentators over there, making snide and less than ‘intellectually honest’ remarks about the Republican candidates. However, please stop pretending to be some ‘real conservative’ who cares what happens in this election. Because of folks like you, Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, and Levin, Obama will more than likely enjoy another term…which I understand is your objective. It gives you more to pretend to whine about!

  • goodgovernance

    Can you deny he has a more conservative governing record than Romney?

  • goodgovernance

    When you hear the man speak, “disdain” and “contempt” were the furthest things from his behavior.

  • goodgovernance

    He could have run in some other state where he had a house close by.

    No one forced Romney into running for governor of the bluest of the blue states, so let’s not pretend he had to make the best of a bad situation. He willingly threw himself into that situation and reassured the voters of Massachusetts he would not be the “scary” kind of Republican who is otherwise known as an authentic conservative.

  • rwcbarry

    and better than everyone. Just look at him.

    We need a Prez that is a numbers guy that knows the financials of this country inside and out. Paul Ryan.

  • becky5

    Erick sums up the whole sorry state of affairs quite accurately.

    I am absolutely dumbfounded that the Republicans’ answer to the horrors of Obama is…….Mitt “Romneycare” Romney. The corporatist, flip-flopping, stand-for-nothing progressive bureaucrat who *lost* to John McCain (who of course *lost* to Odumdum last election).

    I will vote R in November, and I will vote for whichever Non-Romney candidate is leading at the time of my primary (June).

    But I’m under no illusions. If Romney is the next president Obamacare is here to stay, the authoritarian police/surveillance state will continue unabated while the debt grows by trillions each year as we slowly swirl the drain and hope for a slow, managed decline instead of a sudden financial catastrophe that takes us down in one fell swoop.

    If anyone would have told me in November 2010 this is where we’d be at this point I would never have believed them.

  • bzip

    Oddly enough I have to agree with much of Erick’s article here. In other words there isn’t even one honestly good candidate worth getting behind at this point., only hope is a brokered convention.

    Though I do take exception with, “I?ll support the Republican nominee for President. I?ll defend him from meritless attacks and I will oppose Barack Obama.”

    Would it have been too much to ask that you had done this in this primary with the smears, half truths and lies that came from other commentators against some of the candidates?

    Dear Conservative Commentators
    http://teaandfedup.wordpress.com/2012/02/06/dear-conservative-commentators-2/

  • SirGladiator

    We’ll obviously know a lot more 24 hours from now, but from what I’ve been hearing, it sounds quite likely that Mitt Romney is going to lose Missouri and Minnesota to Santorum later today, and Maine to Paul this weekend, while only winning Colorado today, and even that by far less than he won Nevada by. Obviously thats all speculation based on the limited information we have right now, but it certainly suggests that things aren’t going anywhere nearly as well for Romney as the liberal media wants us to believe. If he does indeed only win one of the next four states, that also means he will be getting far less than the 50 percent plus one of the delegates that he will ultimately need to become the nominee. Newt still stands to win quite a few Super Tuesday states, I’ve heard that Santorum is doing particularly well in Ohio, Paul can take Virginia from Romney, and if all that happens, the Romney path to the nomination seriously starts to vanish.

    We all know that delegates to the National Convention are far more Conservative than the nominees they are sometimes forced to vote for (like last time), if Romney doesn’t win on the first ballot, he won’t win at all, because many of the delegates pledged to vote for him will only vote for him because they have to, and once they don’t have to, they will be free to vote for somebody else and happily will. Then we can debate amongst ourselves all we want which genuine Conservative we should support, without any danger of Romney or any other non-Conservative getting the nomination. I think 24 hours from now a lot of folks here who are currently depressed over the notion of Mitt Romney becoming the nominee, are going to feel a LOT better about our chances of nominating a real Conservative instead. At least, I hope so :) .

  • Martin Knight

    He ran his campaign more to appeal to the media and other liberal urban “sophisticates” than the GOP base.

  • becky5

    I can’t type a coherent reply without violating the no profanity rule.

  • rkaley

    a candidate would not affect me one way or an other. We have done a great job in trashing each other and we will lose, deservedly so.
    So far I have been a supporter of Congresswoman Bachman, Gov. Perry, Ambassador Huntsman and Speaker Gingrich. I now support Senator Santorum. We had better realize that the task is to defeat Pres. Obama and we had better be enthusiastic about our nominee.

  • renl57

    “I am still shaking my head how after 3 years of tea party excitement, this is where we are.”

    None of the tea party heroes (with the exception of Bachmann) chose to run for President, that’s how.

    The Tea Party cheered Republican politicians with their apocalyptic rhetoric about how “This is the most important election in our history” and “The future of our Republic is at stake” and so on.

    But then DeMint, Ryan, Rubio, and all the rest decided not to run for President–as if this year’s election isn’t all that important after all.

    Try squaring that circle.

  • jimmyneutron

    I too am unhappy about what is left but we have to make the most of it. From what I have heard Gingrich is by far the most conservative of the remaining candidates and he is saying very conservative things right now. His speech after Florida was filled with conservative ideas that, if implemented, would go a long way to undoing much of the mischief done over the last 8 or so years.

    I am under no false belief that he will govern perfectly. I understand that he will have a tendency to stray off the conservative path from time to time. However, it appears that he understands he was wrong over his past political mistakes and has learned valuable lessons. I am hopeful that if we stay engaged we can nudge him in the right direction on those instances that he strays. I do not believe that about the other candidates.

    I will support Gingrich as much as possible and also work towards electing conservatives to the house and senate where possible. We desparately need to rid ourselves of the current R leadership and replace it with individuals with more boldness and fighting spirit and a truer understanding of conservative principles.

    So there you have it – my strategy for the upcoming campaign. I will support Newt and work to get conservatives into the house and senate. That appears to me to be the best combination to be in a position next year to really begin undoing what has been done and to begin rebuilding with a conservative foundation.

    However, as a disclaimer, lets work to elect real conservatives who DO NOT want to make a career of politics (is those people exist). The idea is not to get more people in DC who simply want to dole out a piece of an ever larger pie to themselves, their relatives, friends, etc but to get people in there who want to shink DC and send that power and money back to states and towns where we the people will have to decide how to govern ourselves instead of ignoring our responsibilities and letting scoundrals far away run things for us.

  • renl57

    There are valid reasons why Huntsman failed to catch on. Even in NH, which should have been favorable territory for him.

    Instead of repeating endlessly why Huntsman was such a good candidate, try asking yourself WHY he failed so dismally.

    I’ve noticed that disappointed supporters of failed candidates rarely do introspection to learn lessons for the next political campaign. They just write off the voters as stupid or uninformed, and repeat the same mistakes in the next political campaign.

    Try asking yourself what Huntsman should do differently next time, if Obama wins this year and Huntsman chooses to run in 2016.

  • colleenlass

    grimeska,
    I shall keep checking my laptop today, to see the list of your accomplishments, which have put you into the position to call Rick Perry DUMB. They must far exceed Rick Perry’s. Lets start at the point of his being a pilot for the US Air Force and then onto his governorship of Texas.
    Please start listing at your first convenience, as I am a very busy lady.
    You insinuated that because Erick at one time saw good things about him, that what he says now is irrelevant.
    I for one, saw the same thing in Perry and I did not run from him when he proved to be a poor debater.
    Debating takes practice, he did not have that practice apparently.
    Pretty much all of Perry’s ideas were brilliant. Can you imagine our representatives having to live under their own laws? What a different country this would be. He did have the guts to do it.
    Now…back you your claim as to how you could discredit Erick and proclaim Rick Perry as dumb.
    Surely, you have accomplished much more. I will be the first to congratulate you on all your achievements.

  • renl57

    The GOP base bet the farm on Perry.

    In this poker game, they put all their chips on Perry and went all in.

    And then they lost.

    And they never recovered from that blow.

    It’s too bad that after Perry botched several debates, guys like Ryan didn’t seize the opportunity and enter the race at that point.

  • papabear

    ????

  • docnick

    your comment is silly and arrogant… Do you believe these comments add to anything… go have coffee at the local hangout with the boys…Ron

  • colleenlass

    Thurman…so very well stated. What you wrote is truth, all should give it much thought.
    No bias, no slamming others….just pure common sense.

  • annie54

    only reveals your own level of intelligence and deficiencies. Grime, if anyone is deserving of Obama, it’s you. Listening to you whine is not a good way to start the day. By the way, are you aware that the definition of “grime” is “accumulated dirt”?

  • romansdaughter

    You better step back and evaluate your big head before it burst. Colleen is right down thread and you should think on what you have said. “Pride cometh before a fall.” If Rick Perry and Erick Erickson are dimwitted…what does that make you?

  • radicalrighty

    I got his newsletters for a while, and he does not believe in cutting the Federal government – just re-arranging it.

    Newt’s ideas are full of big government solutions.

    And worst of all, Newt got rich in DC.

  • romansdaughter

    LOL! “grime” accumulated dirt. Fits him/her perfectly.

  • circlegranch

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/if_fox_fails_us.html by Bruce Walker

    Fox has devolved into a facade of what was once a stellar network with solid reporting. FNC has devalued itself in the eyes of many conservatives, and as evidenced by the above-noted article, their decline is widely apparent. There is a strong market, nonethless, for conservative news, and right now, there is a void to be filled.

  • radicalrighty

    So I won’t, grimy

  • bzip

    “There is a strong market, nonethless, for conservative news, and right now, there is a void to be filled.”

    And boy how I wish I had the money and resources to pure into a new New Media outlet.

    There just isn’t anything that competes in the MSM bunch.

  • racboyzz

    Mr. Erickson.. if none of the current GOP candidates for POTUS then who?

  • Ausonius

    Assuming that MAObama is re-elected with a RINO Congress or a split one like we have today, 2013 brings a series of tax increases via the expiration of the W. Bush tax reductions, the inauguration of many aspects of MAObamaCare, and a host of other intrusions in the economy designed to “equalize” American life and make it “fair” (i.e. socialist).

    This was by design, and has been documented: BIG BRObama may be foolishly arrogant, but he is relentless in forcing his socialist vision upon us.

    I wrote elsewhere yesterday that waiting until 2016 to get a Conservative revolution going may be too late.

  • katem

    very seriously. Just compare Huntsman’s record and policy proposals to those of the other candidates left in the race. (Huntsman and Perry were the only 2 small government conservatives in the race.)

    As to the comments below, I agree that the campaign made mistakes (every campaign does) and said so in my comment above. But that doesn’t change the fact that the Huntsman campaign was probably doomed from the start because conservative media wrote him off simply for serving as an ambassador to China for Obama and too many in the base followed suit. Next time, I hope the media and bloggers will do some due diligence on candidates before declaring any candidate a RINO or worse. We live and learn. And we’re stuck with the field we have.

  • circlegranch

    It’s reported that Team Romney has been using the Tom Brokaw negative comments on Newt in a robocall (in spite of Brokaw asking they stop using it). Santorum, and to a degree, Newt, should do better in predominantly Evangelical El Paso County (supposedly the 4th largest ‘red’ county in the nation). Santorum did 2 stops there last week and drew SRO crowds and has another big rally planned this morning in Colorado Springs. With the endorsement of Colorado Springs’ Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family in the Springs, Santorum’s momentum there is undeniable. The Komen/PP issue along w/ the Catholic opposition to govt forced funding of birth control are both big issues, neither of which Romney has much in the way of credibility, although one of his CO ad’s claims he believes strong families and a return to moral conviction are essential to putting the country back on track. Santorum supporters see this new tack as taking a page from Rick’s playbook, much the way Romney softened his position on immigration after redressing Perry and claiming he supported amnesty and magnets. Romney’s clamoring for issues touted successfully by other candidates is viewed by many in CO as more of the same–political expediency.

    The RNC is predicting ‘record turnout’ in CO, yet only SC has seen an uptick in turn out. IA, NH, and FL had significantly lower numbers of primary/caucus participants. Light snow and cold temp’s are forecast for CO tonight which will likely negatively impact participation. Romney will likely win Colorado if there is a big turnout in the Denver suburbs where GOP voters are predominantly establishment-types. Santorum’s faith and family message is resonating very well in more rural counties.

  • Ausonius

    But even before that, they were buckling under the Administration’s threats about being cut out of the D.C. News Club completely.

    The hacking scandal did not help the situation, and they have detriorated ever since.

    “Where is the Conservative MSM?” For now, it is on the Internet: e.g. right here!

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Olympia Snowe than Rick Perry.

  • JSobieski

    They were just a bit better than their competitors.

    It appears that it takes a Presidential election for people to realize that Fox isn’t all that and a bag of chips. We heard these same complaints in 2008. No doubt similar articles will appear again in 2016 and 2020.

  • exidore

    NT

  • daune

    “We need to make sure that he is never considered to be the ?conservative candidate.? We must not redefine conservatism to fit Mitt Romney.”

    If we elect Mitt Romney, he will confirm the opinion of many that conservatives simply elect the rich businessman who will expand the gulf between haves, and have nots. Unless he understands the basic philosophy of conservatism, he may do us more harm than good. It is virtually impossible to believe he holds conservative values, and if he turns out to be yet another “Read my lips” president he may drive Americans permanently into the arms of the democratic party.

    The only real argument for voting for Romney, if he (groan) wins the nomination, is the fear of what Obama could do to the Supreme Court.

    What I fear is we would win the battle, but lose the war.

  • JSobieski

    One of the following must be true:
    (1) Romney didn’t look at the deep blue veto-proof legislature as being all that contrary to this positions
    (2) Romney ran for governor of Mass for the sole purpose of setting up a Presidential run with a blue state on his resume
    (3) Romney has become more conservative since then
    (4) Romney misjudged the degree to which a blue veto proof legislature made the job of governor essentially worthless

  • Rick_Caird

    I have not yet heard Romney tell us why he is running. He has not told us why his candidacy is unique. He does not seem to have any principled objective.

  • JSobieski

    Ideally, delegates would look for someone with support by both the establishment and tea party.

    Could be a rookie governor. Could be a DeMint, Pence, Ryan, etc.

    I doubt it would be anyone who ran for President.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    A new PPP poll just came out and Romney has a huge lead. Santorum has actually moved past Gingrich, but only by a couple of points.

    Trust me when I tell you that Colorado Republicans are not excited about the remaining candidates.

    Two days ago I got a flyer from the Santorum campaign. No mention of the economy, but FMA was on there. It was all social issues. And he’s going around saying that Newt is pandering. There were also lies about the other candidates on the flyer. So much for character.

    Yesterday I received two flyers from the Romney campaign. I didn’t even look at them before they hit the recycle bin.

    Nothing from the Gingrich campaign.

    For those that are not aware, today’s caucus will result in zero delegates committed to any candidates, but that’s not how the media will tell it. Delegates aren’t committed until the primary election on June 26th. Today at the caucuses is simply a straw poll.

  • RichmondG30

    Two more Elena Kagans between now and 2016 is reason enough to pull the lever for any of the current crop of R’s.

    That’s why cynic is needed here.

    Too many on this website despise Romney with every fiber of their being and spend hour after hour typing hate.

    I don’t like the guy either, but by spending so much energy destroying Romney, we are forgetting about the pure evil in the White House right now, and fail to consider the carnage he will bring when he can act for four more years without the next election tempering his actions.

    For God’s sake, people, he completely bypassed Senate confirmation on several radical appointments a year before his reelection bid.

    Imagine what our country will be in for come January 2013 if he is reelected.

    I, for one, will swallow hard and support Romney. I hope you will join me.

  • paladin1

    At the convention, filled witha majority of establishment types, we cannot hope for any better than what we currently have. Our choices would be:

    Like Romney–Christie
    No personality and aggressiveness–Daniels
    No experience, one issue focus–Ryan
    ETC.

    There is no conservative champion on the horizon, only drones and eunuchs.

  • edintexas

    He’s a Romney fan. He “reads” things into posts which aren’t there (he was the only person to mention staying home). I’ll bet he believes Romney really intends to work for the elimination of Obamacare (as we all know, the President can not repeal, only sign a bill repealing), when by his other comments (and staff statements) we have been told he plans to “fix” it.

    I’ll say this for him – he stated the only reason to show up and vote Romney, should he be the Republican nominee. And it still is a vote against Dear Leader, not “for” Mittens.

    Cynic (right), I won’t stay home. I’ll hold my nose and vote for the Progressive Republican. But what I’ll really be there for is to add to the vote total for the Republicans running for “down ballot” office.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I’d be thrilled with Pawlenty or Jindal, but I don’t see a brokered convention going with either of them.

  • powertothepeople

    the time to have asked that and demanded an answer was squandered. Now we must have only one goal and mindset, beat Obama.

    All this brokered convention crap and lets sway someone else to get in is absolute nonsense. We as a party had the opportunity to “sway” the right one in over a year ago, we had the opportunity to support the candidates such as TPaw, Bachmann, Perry, but we worried more about debate skills, being a gov, and personality, so now we are stuck with Romney and/or maybe Gingrich who combined have all those traits yet lack any conservatism. So how has it all worked out for us.

    Screw why Romney wants to be president, it no longer matters. We only have the hopes of beating Obama left and we are quickly moving to dash those hopes with all this blather and nonsense.

  • christiandystopian

    Mitt (Bain Capitol) Romney to fix the economy! You did research how he made all that money?
    Buy successful companies. Borrow massive cash. Funnel the cash into Bain Capitol. Bankrupt once thriving business. Rinse, repeat… BTW Banks happy, due to kickbacks & bailouts.
    Newt who has demonstrated he has no morals or Rick who wants his idea of morality (Kill babies with bombs/absolutely no abortion.)Massively in favor of the Patriot act and NDAA, stripping all Americans of all civil liberty.
    I don’t want the “Homeland Formerly Known As America” to go bankrupt. I really really don’t want Rick & Newt dictating what attitude is “moral.”
    I have my own personal moral compass. I’ll defend my own morals thank you very much…
    Oh yeah…Just like the oft decried Main Stream Media… Ron Paul doesn’t exist? So what if he doesn’t get elected? He is far better than Robaney, The Grinch, or Sanctitorom.
    Obama at least gives us a chance to blame the Dumocrat’s.

  • paladin1

    election cycle and more exposure to be ready, though he will be a definite go IF we have elections in 2016. I am not a Pawlenty fan either, especially after his cut and run tactics so early in the current cycle. That and he is another non-aggresive-non-exciting type. I think we will need someone like that to get the general fired up to be for someone instead of against Obama, particularly if the economic issues are muted somewhat by the “improving” economy.

    I still think Gingrich may be the best we have until/unless some of the others show us something to inspire.

  • Cowboy

    is going to win Virginia? Wow.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I also think he got out way too early. Otherwise, I think we need someone with Newt’s ability to go right after them.

    I also agree that I’d like to see Jindal get more experience, but he’s already way better than anyone running right now.

  • danandsis

    What a great country we live in where it’s Presidency is determined by the highest bidder!

  • christiandystopian

    When Mitt says the sky is blue and the grass is green…I am compelled to look out the window. I fear things may have changed… dramatically.

  • clowngirl

    I think we looked at the same poll. Romney at 37%? Newt gaining on Santorum?

    That would be good for most states, but it’s not that impressive when you consider we’re part of the “Mormon Belt” and Romney won CO with 60% of the vote last time.

    If Newt can come in second only 10-12 points behind Romney, it can and should be spun as an upset. Romney would’ve *plummetted* since 2008.

    (0f course that poll might not take potentially enhanced turnout among Mormons into account – I’m just saying if the poll turns out to be predictive that wouldn’t be so bad)

    Romney’s strong support in the LDS community helps him to do well in caucuses but won’t have nearly as much of an impact in a general election – so people are likely to take his results in states like Colorado and Nevada with more than a grain of salt.

  • shadowmane

    I refuse to vote for Romney. Period. I don’t care if he’s the Republican nominee. I’m committed to Conservatism, not the Republican Party. If the Republican Party can’t give me a Conservative to vote for, I won’t vote for the liberal they trot out and demand that I vote for. I don’t take my marching orders from the Republicans. Right now, I’m pissed. I’m so pissed I’m about ready to go re-register independent. The Republicans have left the reservation. It won’t be long before they join the left in the long march towards European style socialism. Romney will lead that charge. I won’t vote for him, no matter what.

    And that’s what the Republicans are up against in this election. If they throw Romney out there, they’re going to loose, and loose big. I don’t want Obama re-elected any more than the next guy, but I will not support Romney for any reason whatsoever.

  • znjs

    Not that I believe a brokered convention is likely, but I think at this point if the voters rejected Romney and the party tried to hoist him on us anyhow they’d have a full scale riot on their hands. I can’t believe they’re stupid enough to incite that. As someone who was willing to run but backed out before upsetting any major constituency I think T-Paw would make an acceptable compromise choice to everyone.

  • christiandystopian

    So we can have a Republican Obama doofus! On the up side for Newt & Rick, they will not only “Detain” and Torture me but also legislate my morals. Newt having really staked a claim on that issue.
    Mitt on morality is not a problem. With Mitt it’s all about the Money. Always has been always will be.

  • mike57

    Congressman Paul is the most conservative candidate to run since I was first able to vote in 1976. He is a gentlemen, has the most conservative congressional voting record since 1937, and has consistently stuck with his core beliefs.

    Additionally, Congressman Paul has both the funding and the organization to run against Governor Romney all the way through the primary season. Neither Speaker Gingrich nor Senator Santorum have the funding nor the organization to continue their campaigns that far.

    Regarding electability, the Real Clear Politics Polls show Congressman Paul doing better against President Obama than any other candidate except Governor Romney. Congressman Paul can compete with Governor Romney throughout the promary season, and compete effectively against the President in November.

    Thank you very much for letting me express my opinion.

    Mike

  • clowngirl

    aren’t “prohibitive frontrunners” or “presumptive nominees” supposed to be a lot more dominant than losing 3 out of 4 contests when they supposedly have such big momentum?

    Shouldn’t they win when the popular former Governor of the state endorses them and is willingly attacking the competition at their request?

  • christiandystopian

    I can’t speak for anyone else but My finest political accomplishment personally has been to never take money from the Koch bothers. Especially not when Governor & having massive leverage to help the…wait for it…Koch Brothers own even more of Texas.
    Which thanks to Governor Perry they do. He was bribed well and earned every penny.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    This integrates an analysis of prior-postings and projects future-postings.

    First of all, it is necessary to establish a durable diagnosis. In this case, sadly, it is that the anyone-but-Romney crew [including EE] was so cock-sure of the urgency of coalescing that it opted to dissuade Rick Perry from remaining in the race. [This "won the battle" of S.C., but now threatens to "lose the war" elsewhere.]

    Second, with Santorum-wins looming, it remains vital to learn ASAP from this mistake, and anticipate the looming “reminders” of his ultra-conservative social-rhetoric AND liberal government-spending ideas. [http://www.redstate.com/rsklaroff/2012/02/07/santorum-redux/]

    Third, recalling the definition of “insanity,” it is desirable for true-conservatives to recognize that we CANNOT sit on our hands [as an anguished EE would recommend]; this level of disheartened conduct would play into the hands of BHO, yielding more SCOTUS appointees that would tip-the-balance for our lifetimes. [Proof: the upcoming ObamaCare climax].

    Therefore, it is vital to coalesce behind The Newt [who has forsaken neither true-conservatives nor the evangelical-movement]; if nothing else, Sarah’s support reflects that which resides within the core of TEA Party activists.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    -no-text-

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    In mid-December he was leading here by 12 points. He’s going the other way.

    As for the General, Romney has the best shot to take CO, but I doubt it’s going to matter anyway. It looks like the CRTL is going to get “Personhood” on the ballot again. Nothing works better for Democrat GOTV in Colorado than to have that issue on the ballot.

  • Juggernaut

    to the Romulan piker. Perry made couple of mistakes, not as bad as ROmney’s but Perry wasn’t ready for the national level but neither is Romney! Romney has ruined the conservative movement with hate monging zombies who offer nothing but shallow indignation’s. I have more respect for Ron Paul supporters.

  • danram

    …. pitchfork-waving, Bible-thumping, foaming-at-the-mouth far right-wingers are simply going to have to, yet again, face the fact that you are a minority and you do not control the Repubican Party, no matter how much you like to think that you do. Mitt Romney will wrap this thing up on Super Tuesday.

    You see, the 40% of people in this country who identify themselves as “conservative” are actually composed of two groups. There’s the 10-15% that comprises the hard-core ideologues, to which web sites like this one cater, and then there’s the 25-30% of the population who are moderately conservative but who are also reasonable and who don’t regard compromise as “selling out”. To us, Mitt Romney is a very attractive candidate and we find you loons on the extreme right to be every bit as repulsive as the loons on the extreme left.

    Those are the facts. Deal with it.

  • flodnar

    Sorry Richmond, but biting the bullet could give us lead poision. Either Obama or Obama lite, A.K.A. Romney would not get us out of the whole we are in.
    With all his bagage, Newt is the better choice. To bad he isn’t rich enough to buy the Presidency. Monety talks, and the sheep follow.

  • znjs

    that people here voting for the candidate most likely to beat Romney in their state rather then the candidate they personally prefer? It’s an idea. I have doubts about how successful it will be, but RS could start doing Palin style “endorsements” of the state.

    Darn you Erickson – getting my hopes up even a little that this is possible!

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …other comments emerged that require attention.

    First, unless a candidate is obvious, depending upon a brokered-convention would be a crap-shoot; anyone who hadn’t been participating in debates would automatically be perceived as having not been sufficiently battle-trained.

    Second, Ron Paul’s foreign policy is unacceptable; note how he waffled on FNC last night regarding Iran, for he actually argues [remember the Vietnam quote that we destroyed a village to "save" it] that Israel would benefit from American neutrality.

    Third, I recognize these thoughts are conveyed on the eve of knowing a lot more about voter sentiment, but the large number of dissatisfied people will not predictably budge; those with whom I’ve communicated via RS’s linkage [some of whom have emerged supra] have emphasized their longing for a return of Perry [if The Newt falters], who remains on many ballots.

    Mitt is vulnerable, but the PMSNBC-led media are going appreciably soft, for now, hoping he will follow in McCain’s footsteps. This is 1980, and we need a true-conservative to lead America from the “malaise” and loss of American Exceptionalism [which, BTW, also was discounted last night by Paul] which BHO embodies.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    God-haters are humorous to watch. I think it’s that foaming-at-the-mouth thing.

  • bcanuck

    ‘We?re losing our freedoms through administrative decree and a total trampling of the Constitution. None of the candidates get it. ‘
    Ron Paul gets it. In fact, he never shuts up about it. Why not vote for the only candidate that truly defends the Constitution?

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …and that is the need to differentiate “compromise” from “seeking common ground.”

    Mitt isn’t a conservative [ref. Rush], and we need to energize the GOP-base [including those who are allegedly "moderately conservative"] by nominating a LEADER [as opposed to someone who has, from the GOP perspective, been "leading from behind"].

  • texanlady

    People don’t believe Romney and they don’t like him. Look at the new Rasmussen polls. I predict he will do far worse than John Kerry who had a similar wooden personality. Obama is a little cold for most people but compared to Mitt he looks like Bill Clinton. Reagan, Clinton and Bush all connected and they all served two terms. At least Santorum is sincere and people are picking up on that.

  • jakeofalltrades

    Have fun destroying the nation you’re too “reasonable” not to drive off the cliff’s edge.

  • circlegranch

    it is only a non-binding straw poll, often taken on post-it notes tossed in a hat. As Night reports, the media is erroneously claiming there will be delegates awarded. Not so. Colorado has 9 and they aren’t proportioned tonight.

    Santorum actually did send out a more comprehensive flyer (beyond just family values as Night reported). In it, he contrasts himself fiscally against Mitt and Newt, and mentions he’s fought for a balanced budget amendment, etc. (No mention made, however, of his actual voting record in the Senate. Shhh.)

    Newt also put out a flyer, ” The Choice is Clear” into CO mailboxes, contrasting himself and Romney. He zero’s in on jobs/growth, taxes, defending life, guns (a lost issue in this race….NRA, where fore art thou?), the fact that Newt is a lifer as a Republican and Mitt once said, “Look, I was an independent during the time of Reagan/Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan/Bush”. Newt also discusses his Contract w/ America and the fact that Mitt disagrees with a contract and instead suggests, “Let’s get together and work together”. Reaching across the aisle has always worked well for Republicans, right?

  • elayman

    Instead of displacing blame on the candidate or campaign, try asking yourself why Romney is the front-runner because he’s the most electable (supposedly), yet Huntsman was 100x more conservative than a flip-flopping, quintessential politician/chameleon like Mitt and a much stronger general election candidate without any of the baggage or dirty laundry. Conservatives put themselves out of the game by obsessing more on an overwrought sense of martyrdom and hurt feelings than the fate of this great nation. Here is hoping the only true candidate with actual credentials will be back to face a more mature audience 2016.

  • red_oakster

    If Romney proves incapable of wrapping up the nomination before the convention, considering just how weak and under-capitalized the opposition has been, the delegates will look for someone else.

    That someone else will need to be acceptable to both tea party delegates and GOP establishment delegates. When you look out to see who might be acceptable compromises, there are relatively few names. Ryan, Jindal, McDonnell, Jeb Bush, maybe Rubio (though he’s likely to be in contention for VP). My own preference is for Ryan.

  • paladin1

    who helped usher in the age of Obama. Their superior attitude and denigration of conservatism is completely why so many question whether conservatives should leave this party, as Erick posted recently. Since the “superior beings” such as you can’t seem to win elections without us, and we can’t win elections with you, we don’t lose much by going our way while you lose big if we do. Come to thing of it neither do you since you delight in nominating Dem-lite candidates anyway.

    “then there?s the 25-30% of the population who are moderately conservative but who are also reasonable and who don?t regard compromise as ?selling out?.

  • mike57

    the government labeled those who dissented as “crazy.” Was that what you meant?

  • circlegranch

    Admittedly, I did not invest my waning time in watching Fox last night, but think she was not invited on air to give her almost-endorsement of Newt as she did on the eves of the SC and FL votes.

    I’m assuming if Fox had entertained her for opinion and she again cast her lot with Newt, sort of, it would be newsworthy this morning. Perhaps her opposing views are not being sought so frequently?

    Over at The Blaze I see that the other Ann in Mitt’s life—Ann Coulter—was invited on Hannity to help save her skin for recent, and justifiable, outings of her no longer being a conservative. She claims to have told Romney he better be a Right Wing president as she’s touted he will be. Supposedly, he laughingly reassured her. Oh, good. We all feel much better now.

    Maybe Ms. Ann is vying to be his Attorney General? Her speaking tour and book sales may well be in decline after her willingness to leave the conservative reservation. She may be wanting to return to the practice of law–she will need refresher courses, however, on the Constitution.

  • Common_Cents

    Vetted?
    prepared on issues?
    ready to debate?
    can get an organization and money?
    can unite various factions?

    A new candidate coming in is pretty much a fantasy.

    Are we now like obama supporters? Waiting for the political messiah to save us from ourselves?

  • acat

    Because calling names does have a tradition in this country, and “pitchfork-waving bible-thumping foaming-at-the-mouth” brings to this cat’s mind “bitter, clining to bibles and guns”…

    I’ve got news for the 25%-30% who self-identify as “conservative” .. they’re not. Conservatism has some very solid ideological underpinnings, merely claiming to be part of the club don’t cut it.

    As Willard “Mitt” Romney does not appear to respect this body of conservative ideology, your need to self-deceive and to deceive others becomes apparent…. and kinda pathetic.

    Do please take your lies and go elsewhere. You may be more comfortable joining Ann Coulter’s fan club.

    Mew

  • gsatt

    to Romney because as long as he is on the other side of the ballot from Boma he knows he has our vote. plain and simple. So he will be appealing to those who are not as far to the right as us, as he may. That adds that many more voters against the prez. As much as it sucks to watch, were going to be going for the ride on this one…… again. FML

  • Common_Cents

    Wasn’t aware of CO. wow, great reporting by the lame stream media.

    I’m sure they want to crown Romney asap to get on with the attacks. McCain all over again.

  • talonspoint

    Here here!

    Republicans need a brokered Convention to actually unite a fracturing party. This election cycle is not just about personalities. In the post Tea Party movement environment there are deep ideological rifts that threaten to leave groups of conservatives staying home rather than voting against the Constitution itself.

    A brokered Convention will give these groups a voice and force Romney to pivot right or even to topple him if he refuses to. No wonder the non Romney candidates are staying in this race. They see the possibility they might end up as 1 or 2 when the dust settles.

  • acat

    The only way stuff happens is if someone gets bribed, right?
    The only way anyone makes money is illegally, right?

    Take the #OWS talking points and go away.

    Mew

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Yeah, pretty much. I mean, you guys are all OK with mass murder. Well, of Vietnamese & Jews anyway.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    It’s either entertainment or propoganda, and often it’s both.

  • unclefred

    There comes a time when you have to choose between a poor choice and an utterly destructive choice. Statements equating Romney and Obama are criminally fallacious.

    Majorities in the Senate and House are not going to protect the court, nor stop the constitutional over reach by this administration. If it’s Romney, we must push him across the line if only because, unlike Obama, a Republican legislature with more conservatives will restrain Romney’s liberal impulses.

  • jrg50

    Mow that Roemer’s got Fed Funds…give him a shot at it.

    The guy’s got a decent resume, and a good head on his shoulders.

  • mike57

    nor do I support mass murder. Don’t be quick to judge.

    For what it’s worth, I was in favor of our intervention in Vietnam, and in our support of Israel, and have voted straight ticket GOP since 1984.

  • powertothepeople

    are no different. Can not wait for the day you morons retreat back to the bunkers you came from, you know those “caves” filled with Nazi crap and anti Jewish lit, and we get the notice in the paper of your leaders demise. It is one funeral I will celebrate greatly.

    Now, shove off jackass.

  • tngal

    (But this might explain it better)

    “Although the three contests could give winners momentum, they are nonbinding and will not award delegates, according to the Republican National Committee. Colorado?s 36 delegates will be chosen at district conventions in the spring. Minnesota will award 40 delegates at district conventions in April. And Missouri?s primary is merely a ?beauty contest? ? the state?s 52 delegates will be chosen beginning with precinct caucuses on March 17.”

    http://financialpress.com/2012/02/07/romney-tries-to-beat-back-possible-santorum-surge-in-trio-of-states/

  • dalehogue

    I like Mitt Romney. I like what he says and how he says it. I like how he conducts himself in the debates. I admire his patience — it appears that he is “more cool” than Obama, but anybody who has an ounce of patience is more patient than our first black president. I like the fact that Romney doesn’t have to beat up on the other Republican candidates in order to be noticed. He is not a whiner, and I sure do like that.

    If this election is determined by how the economy is doing, then most American voters aren’t paying attention to what Obama is really doing. And that is truly sad!

    The uninformed voters are uninformed because they don’t work hard enough to become informed about the both the issues and the experience and the personalities of the candidates who want this job for the nest four years.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Because everything you said about Ron Paul in your first comment is a load of crap.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    Sarah unambiguously supported the outspokenness that only The Newt is conveying…

    Ann was not questioned on ObamaCare [in-between her tiresome giggles, which also obfuscate when she appears on Red-Eye].

    Of the big-three, Greta is consistently the only follow-up questioner.

  • sbm1

    Are the only two that would pass that scrutiny and have the phone numbers in place. I am convinced Palin would get shellacked, and am convinced that Jeb wouldn’t want to be in it now.

    And I wish whatever Daniel’s Wife’s issue is why he won’t run, that that issue didn’t exist, but it appears he won’t touch a national campaign because of it…because everything nowadays comes out in a national campaign…..imagine what the Kennedy/Nixon campaign would have been like in 2012…

  • unclefred

    nt

  • wbedding

    Obama, et al, will continue to distort and lie to the constituency about the economic numbers. when unemployment went down to the fictitious 8.5%, you would have thought that it was V-E Day all over again! this man is the king of liars and will do so, as he has so consistently done since running for every elected office he has ever held. that is why the gloves MUST come off and we MUST attack the liar-in-chief on every single angle we can and hold nothing back. it is exactly why he is in office right now! John RHINO McCain and the Republican Party failed miserably in 2008. Obama has nothing to stand on except his deficits and spending. this is an all-out war for our future, and in war, you don’t go in with a squirt gun when your enemy is carrying an AK-47. the man has volumes of material to use against him. let the truth out and we will win. hold back and welcome to the USSR in 2012.

  • mike57

    The congressman’s voting record is documented. He is consistently a supporter or the constitution, as reported by the Washington Post, here:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/ron-pauls-constitutionalist-record-fact-checker-biography/2011/12/27/gIQAsPSOLP_blog.html

    Both Senator Santorum and Speaker Gingrich are limited in terms of money and organization. That has been reported widely in the news, and it seems that there is concern on this blog about their ability to win the Primary.

    Real Clear Politics has polling data here:

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html

    I am completely opposed to mass murder; can you provide a link showing where the Congressman is in favor of that?

    Thanks.

  • redcal

    That’s what I expect out of Romney. Sununu is one of his key surrogates, for pete’s sake. That’s about the clearest dog whistle to the crypto-centrist wing of our party that you could give. No “extreme candidates”.

    And though I will be supporting House/Senate GOP candidates far more happily, I don’t think they will actually have influence over a President Romney, who will be obsessively focused on re-election even before his inauguration. That’s all this guy seems to care about, the only core principle I (or anyone else) can identify in his 20 years of mostly failed political activity. That will drive him to the center as powerfully as it did Clinton on the left and both of the Bushes leading up to their re-elections.

  • pg1701

    Absolutely, Amen.

    Beside which, if Romney does not become our nominee, it means the GOP establishment has failed in their attempt to manipulate the truth and ruin the reputations of good men in order to get Romney over the finish line.
    They have tried to rob this primary from ‘We the People’.

    If ANYTHING is a red flag for everyone, it is that McCain voted AGAINST term limits this past week. They are moderates. We should wsh our hands of them.

  • sbm1

    I am the biggest proponent of “trees grow” on this planet….and I fully believe in the ability of the american economy to grow and prosper…..but it takes a while for trees to grow when you are pouring asphalt all over the ground.

    Obama can get a decent headline number for unemployment in January…..but the numbers underneath are so bad that there is no way those are green shoots…they are dead cat bounces, or eyes of a storm.

    Look at the avg salaries of the jobs cut, and the jobs gained….and it is akin to reistribution of wealth on a jobs level….the 50-150k jobs lost in the financial sector are counted 1 to 1 to a 20k job in light manufacturing…but just as you would be burning more calories if you walked everywhere rather than took a car, it is still better to have access to a car so you can actually ever go more than 4 miles from home.

    There is no understanding of what the government has to avoid doing to allow the shoots of green to grow, to allow people to fathom that they might want or need to hire someone, and to stop people from playing scaredy cat with their money and investment…..and obama is doing exactly the opposite.

    So you can manipulate headline unemployment numbers, you might even be able to manufacture some signs of economic growth, but there is no way without some abandonment of some major policy decisions which scare the heck out of anyone who wants to grow a business, that you are going to make the average person really feel that we are on a growth track….

    Obama has fired all his ammo…he has no more powder dry…there is no osama to kill….more instability in the middle east, especialyl directly after afghan and Iraq military withdrawal is going to be a potential huge stumbling block….rapid economic decline in the developing world…european default fears…..the downside is just so much bigger than the upside….

    I remember reading an article in 1992, some 8 months before the election when Bush1 was riding high with over 60% approval ratings that there were some economic indicators which showed he was going to lose the election, because they had historically never yielded an incumbent win….I don’t remember what they were, but I cannot imagine they are in positive territory now, or will be by november…..but I think Perot had more to do with 8 years of Clinton than anything the R’s did back then.

  • cbartlett

    Obama + Supreme Court = LIFETIME disaster! That is the main reason to do whatever it takes to get him out of the White House ASAP.

    Also – I have to keep thinking that even if Mitt won’t “fight” to get Obamacare repealed, SURELY he wouldn’t have the gall to veto a repeal if we manage to get enough conservatives in Congress to actually get the repeal legislation through both houses. If Mittens manages to defeat Obama ( that’s a gamble I won’t bet on either way) we’re just going to have to work extra hard through the back door and get real conservatives in Congress.

    Read this interesting article this morning. Seeing all of Obama’s evil agenda in one list is pretty sobering. This needs to be condensed into a 30-second ad campaign. The sheeple need to be educated before November.
    http://markamerica.com/2012/02/07/dereliction-or-treason/

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …for he never truly received a second-look.

    [note how we're suddenly talking of a no-fly zone over syria]

  • redcal

    I liked Huntsman, too, but he clearly wasn’t the “only true candidate with actual credentials”. He was only governor of a smallish state for 4 years, putting him on par with Romney for tenure. Perry ran a much larger state for a lot longer. Being ambassador is nice and all, but it’s a non-executive position and one where you essentially implement policy decided several levels north of you.

    Huntsman would clearly have been a better choice (in my mind) than Romney (he’s great on taxes, for one), but everyone knew the game going in, and Romney played it far better than Huntsman. If you don’t know how to campaign in a national primary, which Huntsman CLEARLY did not, then it doesn’t really matter what your positions are, how strong you would have been in the general, etc. Huntsman simply did not prepare for the actual fight ahead of him.

    And if you’re hoping for a more ‘mature’ audience (presumably meaning one that agrees with your views), good luck with that. I’m happy to bet against anyone you support then, as you clearly are detached from political reality and thus (in betting terms) a perfect mark.

  • paco12348

    I have always been a proud Republican but today, can honestly say I see no difference in the way the two Parties treat their base. Both are so hungry for power they use the whip of fear to scare the people into voting for the person they want, the person they feel can not only win, but for the person that will not shake up their Party. Rove came out before the race really began touting Romney as the only one electable. In NH a woman repeated those words after walking from the vote and said enough to let one know it wasn’t the one she wanted. She voted from fear. Shame on Rove and the other GOP leaders. They have done a good jobinstilling fear and killing enthusiasm, but in the long run have lost respect from their base. They destroyed Newt when it looked like he was on a high roll. They don’t want anyone that might shake them up, just someone, like Romney who will help the economy and go along to get along. Same ol’ playhouse.
    My vote is for Newt because he will shake up the GOP as well as the Left. When he’s positive, he speaks to the things many of us see as “needing to be fixed” but our esteemed leaders do nothing about. Vote for the one you want. Don’t let the GOP push you over the cliff. They will blame you anyway for low voter turnout if we lose. They have killed the enthusiam and paralized the people with fear of casting the wrong vote. We are only enthused when we vote for the want WE want.

  • clintonformccain

    community college tuition in Texas. To me, that is a perfect example of how the conservative wing of the party has become dysfunctional — making every single issue a philosophical litmus test every policy a call to arms, to the point where no candidate can possibly jump every hurdle and still be a viable candidate in an actual national election.

    The end result is that there is no viable conservative wing candidate in this primary race… and there never has been (except for Perry before he imploded).

  • redcal

    You have to wonder…how did we end up with a repeat of 2008, with a mediocre candidate we didn’t really believe in? I mean, this is the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

  • cbartlett

    The Dems have been setting up the class warfare agenda for months now in anticipation of using it against Romney. He has given them plenty of video clips, just like the “very poor” one, to use in hundreds of ads. It’s going to be really hard not to wince every time they show up next fall. Google “Romney” and “flip-flop” sometime – enormous amount of material available. What have we gotten ourselves into?!?

  • paladin1

    unelectable and Jeb Bush is still a Bush. If Perry got whacked so badly over the GWB look-alike theme, why would the support be there for a real Bush? GWB was great on foreign policy and we needed him for 911, there was none better; but this is an economy election and Jeb is bred into the big government, big spending, government has the answers family. We should avoid dynastic presidencies at all costs.

  • Martin Knight

    … and focus on the states where the filing deadlines haven’t passed. Target is to deny Mitt the 50%+ (i.e. 1144 delegates) he needs to wrap this up and send us into brokered convention.

    This means immediately getting his people to file all the paperwork and to collect at least twice the number of signatures necessary to qualify in every state left i.e. if you need 10,000 signatures, your target is 20,000.

    Then he has to run a much better campaign than he did before.

  • Ausonius

    Your last paragraph may be our epitaph.

    When lying propaganda is not instantly countered in today’s electronic age, it seeds and sprouts and grows like kudzu. The Internet is a greenhouse for myths, half-truths, and outright lies.

    It takes energy to kill the weeds of falsehood, or at least to offset them: 2008 showed us that few Republicans had the courage to pull out the weeds sown by BIG BRObama, propagandist extraordinaire!

  • znjs

    Or did people take a 2nd look and still not go for it? I find it hard to believe that given the weakness and general dissatisfaction of this field people wouldn’t give him a 2nd look, but then just decided against him.

  • krish

    Fox news has been moving to center or slightly left all along! the problem is we have not been paying attention!

    I call it “Washington Syndrome” that afflicts our conservative politicians – they get elected with fire & brimstone – first the leadership gets them & whatever conservatism is left will be taken out by liberal media (especially women in media ask them to support the poor, sick, old, minorities….). We will be left wondering what happened? Same thing has been happening to the media people!

    The counterforces to this liberal media conversion was Fox,Rush, Levin, Savage, Hannity, Ingram & few others. Unfortunately, other than Levin (great show yesterday where he exposed Romney & his campaign!) & Savage, others have joined establishment or in case of Rush not to turn off any listeners -higher ratings means $$$ so that he can peddle his stuff (he should develop some gonads like his buddy Levin).

    The need to be accepted by liberal media & liberal friends in DC & New York is so powerful that most conservatives turn in to moderate mush without any backbone! The republican politicians talk & act conservative just before elections when people start paying attention

    Tea Party & conservatives have to be on the vigil all the time especially to support the true conservatives who go against RINO republican leadership! New Media is the last resort for all of us!

  • Finrod

    14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

    15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.

    16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.

  • deVere

    A Defining Moment

    “When you set minimum wage levels higher than many inexperienced young people are worth, they don’t get hired. It is not rocket science.”

  • Change Jar Conservative

    Not advocating it, but could see that be where the brokered convention goes.

    Ron Paul’s people line up because it’s Ron’s son.

    Tea Party people line up because Rand was one of the big victory’s of the Tea Party.

    Conservatives line up because he does fight some of those lone battles in the Senate.

  • texasref

    What the hell does being overweight or lesbian have to do with making bad law?

    Even a left-winger who can separate their politics from their job could be a good judge (but I doubt it).

  • salj

    Newt can win.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    NT.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Name one significant bill that Ron Paul has authored, gathered support, and passed the House. Shouldn’t be hard. Just look up The Paul-insert Democrat co-sponsor here Act. He’s been there long enough.

    Sitting in the House doing nothing isn’t leadership. It’s followership. We need a leader, not a pontificator.

    RP thought leaving Vietnam when and how we did was a good thing. Millions of slaughtered Vietnamese disagree.

    The guy is bat-crap crazy and I can’t wait until December when he finally retires from politics for good.

  • romansdaughter

    “It does not take a majority to prevail…but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men.” I am not pitch fork waving, neither foaming at the mouth but I do believe the Bible and you are the one that is part of the problem that we have in the US. You with many others have taken God out of our country and our nation is going down the tubes, Our nation was founded on Judeo Christian principles and now we are the far right wingers. No wonder we are in decline.

  • WillWong

    Why bother doing these in the general when we kind of turned a blind eye to the smearing that went on in the primary? Not saying that Erick did but not sure he fought all he could to stop Romney’s smear against Newt.

  • deVere

    We may well get through all the primaries without anyone commanding a majority of the delegates. But these four men, whatever their deficiencies, have invested their sweat and blood into the campaign. They will not willingly surrender the prize to an outsider, who has not been on the field of battle. So I expect a deal between two or even three of the contrenders to choose the ticket before the convention’s first ballot. Personal interests will take precedence over what is best for the party and nation.

  • jakeofalltrades

    …so who knows? I know Mormons and Christians use the same name to describe completely different people. Come to think of it, Jews and Muslims also use the name “Jesus” to describe a man unrecognizable to Christian theology.

    What this has to do with the Sweet Meteor of Death is unclear, unless you allege God will send Wormwood as punishment for a Romney nomination. In which case, that’s just one more reason to vote for him.

  • clowngirl

    On the PPP poll on 2/4, Newt was at 18.

    In the one that ended on 2/6, he was at 21. ( and that averaged a couple of days, so I’m hoping the trend is that Newt is gaining as he gives the state a little attention and that the 2/6 numbers alone were a bit higher than 21)

    I wasn’t comparing to the poll back in December.

  • jakeofalltrades

    The Sweet Meteor of Death is the Truly Inevitable Candidate

    7 The first angel sounded: And hail and fire followed, mingled with blood, and they were thrown to the earth. And a third of the trees were burned up, and all green grass was burned up.

    8 Then the second angel sounded: And something like a great mountain burning with fire was thrown into the sea, and a third of the sea became blood. 9 And a third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed.

    10 Then the third angel sounded: And a great star fell from heaven, burning like a torch, and it fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water. 11 The name of the star is Wormwood. A third of the waters became wormwood, and many men died from the water, because it was made bitter.

    12 Then the fourth angel sounded: And a third of the sun was struck, a third of the moon, and a third of the stars, so that a third of them were darkened. A third of the day did not shine, and likewise the night.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    All my political friends up North seem to be moving to Santorum. For the life of me I can’t figure out what anyone sees in that guy.

  • mike57

    The way we left Vietnam was a disgrace. I wasn’t aware that he was in favor of our sudden departure, but I trust you on that.

    Also, I understand that he hasn’t passed any major legislation.

    I guess we disagree about his mental health. Wrong and crazy are differnt things. Can we disagree on that point?

    Who then should we support in the primaries? Romney? Gingrich? Santorum?

    I’m not trying to be a wit, but I could use some advice.

    Thanks.

  • conservnca

    Common cents mentioned who are the names of the campaign ready candidates. There is only one and that is Rick Perry. The things that contributed to his rough beginning are dealt with and he is stronger than ever. Watch some of his recent interviews. He will be speaking at CPAC and people should watch and listen to him. You will be impressed.He is battle tested on several fronts already. He has successfully fought the courts, legislature, Obama, federal gov. EPA, and more and WON. He even managed to get three Planned Parenthood abortion clinics shut down. Quite a feat considering what we just witnessed with the strong arming of the Susan G. Komen organization. He’s a fighter! He would fight Obama. He is not timid. Those re-election campaigns he’s been in were pretty rough. The Texas press is vicious and out to destroy him. They always have been, yet he has been victorious in spite of them.
    Not only does he possess a fantastic governing record, he also has quite a record on how to do battle. He could definitely take it to obama.I know there are those who disagree, but I am telling you, he’s the one! He left the race convinced he was doing the right thing for the country. Now he needs to be convinced that doing the right thing for the country would be to get back in and fight. Those that convinced him to get out should be at his door. It cracks me up now that EE is calling for Gingrich and Santorum to stay in the race. I thought he only told people to get out. He made a huge mistake for doing that to Perry and I just pray (considering the field now) that we as Americans don’t end up paying for it. All of the spin that has taken place on why Mitt is the one( economy), Gingrich is the one (debater, fighter) and Santorum( family values) have not helped any of them to generate passion from the people. It’s because they are the wrong candidates.If the people would let their voices be heard for a candidate who they believe would fight Washington successfully, all the media, GOP and fraudulent voting, couldn’t stop that person from winning the White House. This race has been stolen from us at this early date and we need to take it back. We need a leader as a candidate who could help us to do that, and that would be Rick Perry.

  • znjs

    Talk about a campaign that would look unprofessional; jumping in, going home with everyone thinking he was out but then back in for SC until he decided to jump out before that vote and now back in again. That would just look like a candidate who doesn’t know what he’s doing. And despite the Perry Posse here, there is no national outcry for him to get back in to justify such silliness. He’d turn himself into a walking punch line.

  • funwithknives

    only allows your position/beliefs to slide off ,further into the abyss. The reverse opinion always comes back for “another pass at the ring” and You [in your self-confident, insular wisdom} are stuck with less than you started with. {see also: Hegelian Dialectic}
    On your Feet?, or On your Knees? 'Reasonable' got us McCain, then Barry. ' Reasonable' got us GWB ,Signed Mcain/Feingold, NCLB, and Medicare, part D, Little to no oversight of the SEC/Fannie/Freddie, the lightbulb ban, and similar. Who, could even be called "moderate", can be in favor of those ,ex-post-facto?
    IMHO you give your chosen demographic far more value {hence :numbers ] than really exist.
    Substitute the phrase;” Easily Led Astray”, and Now you got somethin’….
    *Moderately Conservative *, in reality, is simplistic jargon for finger- in- the- windism. Kinda like “Progressive Conservative.”
    Too ready to bow, and too ready to run, to the mushy middle. You might have lotsa’ friends and like minds there, but where is the level of personal Liberty & Freedom advanced in that cause? Wossa’- Matta’? don’t you care, even a little bit? Small begets Small.
    F I N I S

  • jakeofalltrades

    else they wouldn’t have asked Perry to drop out in the first place.

  • clowngirl

    Santorum’s still campaigning in Colorado Springs today while Newt is off to Ohio ( but calling in to the Mike Rosen show)

    Did you see Dan Reeves just endorsed Newt? Too bad he didn’t come out here to campaign alongside him. Reeves was never the coach that got the Broncos their Super Bowl wins and he eventually clashed with Elway, but he was the Broncos head coach for quite a long time and most probably remember him more positively than not and it might help Newt pack a rally.

    Wonder if anybody sought Elway’s endorsement. He endorsed McCain in the general and the rallies including Elway reportedly brought McCain his biggest CO crowds.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    When it comes right down to it only Newt has actual conservative accomplishments in his career.

    Romney’s accomplishments are all moderate at best and progressive at worst.
    Santorum’s accomplishments are more government spending and union support.
    Ron Paul has no accomplishments.

    Actions speak louder than words. MUCH louder.

  • mike57

    You and I good?

    I appreciate your positions, and the info on Paul and Vietnam.

    Mike

  • Change Jar Conservative

    I’d take any of those four over the current crop.

    I am qualified. Well, constitutionally.

  • usedtobelib

    The knock you guys have against Mitt is inconsistency, yet you’ll throw support for an up/down, helter-pskelter, politically AND emotionally unstable Gingrich.

    People, look to some biological truths here: Newt’s mom was bi-polar and while many people with this horrid mental illness can live meaningful and productive lives when they have the support of loved ones and strong medical council, they do so in spurts, esp if they don’t suffer from psychosis and instead only from hypomania, which is replete with its ups and downs in mood, in productivity,in irritability, and replete with its delusions of and capricious reversals in beliefs and thoughts.

    I’d never diagnose Newt as suffering from hypomania, although many signs are there; however, it’s obvious that he has inherited certain characteristics of this trait and that these characteristics have indeed affected in a negative way his personal life AND his professional life. That any of you would consider him Presidential material…well, it makes me sick. Sick that you’d prefer a man prone to dangerous emotional swings, as the leader of the free world, sick that somehow you’d not see…or perhaps not realize because of your bias, what was directly in front of you.

    Just what are you seeing when you look at Newt? Or have you not been paying attention all these years, my friends? Have you not been listening to the whispers and then putting his biography and his behavior these long decades together, adding them all up, and seeing what was before your eyes.

    He’s unstable by nature. He will not change.

  • apachecav

    I have been a lifelong Republican 40+ years, and now it?s over.. I will not vote for Romney, I will write in Ronald Reagan ..hmm now that is an interesting thought, what if as a protest against the establishment we all wrote in and voted Reagan? Obama is going to win anyway and there is nothing in the constitution that says you can’t elect a dead guy…More interesting, what if he won?

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I guess I need another cup of coffee. :-)

  • WillWong

    Just take a look at the LBGT movement….definitely a small percentage of the US population but well financed, militant, tireless, and irate and no one can argue with the advances they have made! Roll eyes!

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    But yeah, Elway still brings ‘em out. Tebow would too, but I don’t see him getting involved.

  • drothgery

    The only possibilities if Mitt goes to the convention with a plurality of delegates rather than an outright majority (if you’re going to pretend Mitt will not have a plurality, then you’re not serious) are either Romney getting nominated anyway (most likely) or another insider type who knows how to work the delegates gets nominated. And the two people who would have seemed to be the most likely candidates to emerge from a brokered convention have rendered themselves ineligible; Jeb Bush has explicitly said he won’t seek the nomination in a brokered convention, and Haley Barbour’s pardons have made his nomination impossible. So odds are a brokered convention still nets us Romney — except that the anyone-but-Romney crowd now has two months to get over it instead of four and gets to claim they were silenced by DC insiders instead of actual voters.

  • mikeburch3

    I will not vote for Mittt Romney.Why?? Because he is Obama Lite,romney care/obama care,whats the difference?Do you trust a politician who keeps his money in off shore accounts?What is wrong with American banks.If you do not like the tax structure here then change it..as a politician.Do not run very negative campaigns,you are only hurting your own party.Do not run lies about your opponent ,run on your own accomplishments..What has Romney really done that stands out.If this turkey is all we have and the republican national committee gives the nod to him,then I will NOT VOTE in November.I will not vote as a protest to the way this whole affair is running.It seems like this has been preordained from the very beginning.I find that to be an insult to our intelligence.WE as Americans can vote for and nominate our own candidate.We do not need some so called smart people doing it for us.These committees can go to where ever bad people go.

  • roadrunnered

    Rush Limbaugh Facebook Friends…1,027,955

    SarahPalin….3,279,298….

    Any thoughts…..?

  • runner12

    At this point, we have little to lose by it and potentially much to gain. Not only could we potentially gain a more acceptable candidate to both conservatives and the establishment, but it sends a clear message that we the people still have a voice in this process.

    Brokered Convention 2012

  • znjs

    He was splitting the not-Mitt vote but wasn’t polling well enough anywhere to actually pick up a state.

  • thosjefferson

    Every time Gingrich runs his anti-Obama ads claiming Romney is pro-choice, it helps Romney. Committed conservatives know the ad is false, while the general public, especially independents, prefer a pro-choice candidate to Gingrich or Santorum. Romney should hope Gingrich stays in the race and keeps running these ads.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …despite his dramatic improvement during the debates.

  • roadrunnered

    Rush Limbaugh Facebook Friends….1,0127,955

    Sarah Palin…..3,279,394

    Any ideas…?

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    He was attacked by the RINO’s who want to protect their turf within the D.C. Beltway; they must be called-out and the public must recognize the forces-of-quiet-friendship that stymied a Great Man.

  • apachecav

    Sorry this committed Conservative knows no such thing.. Romney is a bad wanabe conservative; he can?t but keep stepping his foot into liberal dog squeeze because that is what he is…

  • christine777

    constantly slamming Rick Perry and calling him dumb just because he is not s great debater. He has been a work horse for our Texas economy and created over a million jobs under his three terms as governor. Check out his site as Governor of Texas and you’ll be able to read about new companies that have been recruted to Texas through the Texas Enterprise Fund and the Texas Emerging Technologies Fund. Almost on a weekly basis, there are companies relocating to Texas offeirng good paying jobs, and it’s not all in the oil and gas industry either.He’s a good, decent man who really cares about this country, a patriot who enlisted and served his country, and has morals. He had major back surgery just a month before entering the president race. Can you imagine the pain he had to suffer through during the two hour debates on his feet? It’s no wonder he had a hard time remembering somethings. The media that played up his gaffs destroyed our chances of having a strong leader with great ideas as president. Now look at who our choices are.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …and a potential-collapse of The Newt [as he continues to practice murder/suicide] could yield a vacuum…that he could then reverse-endorse!

  • JSobieski

    Which is better than being oriented towards liberal democrats.

    They loved Rudy, but Rudy was actually more conservative than conventional wisdom gave him credit for. Conversely, Romney is more liberal than conventional wisdom acknowleges.

    I don’t see Fox much movement in Fox over the years. When they first came on the scene, people loved having a non-leftist network so much that it colored their judgment.

  • znjs

    So the only way you’ll believe that Perry was given a 2nd chance is if the media props him up? Maybe Perry should be good enough not to need their help, or even to overcome them. Santorum was ignored up until polling in Iowa made it clear he had a real chance to win the thing. Newt has been mocked from here to the moon.

  • porkandcheese

    Meaning Mitt Romney when he appointed a bunch of Democrats and activists as Gov of MA. Not a hair’s breadth of difference between Romney and Obama. But Erick Erickson, Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin got us to this point where SMOD looks like the ticket. All the other establishment candidates like Perry and Huntsman were given far less leeway than a bunch of kooks and has beens. Cain could make major foreign policy gaffes, but darn it he was so charismatic! Yet Perry was just screwing the pooch with his brain fart in an early debate. The base gets so played during this whole dog and pony primary to coronate Mitt. His tentacles go deep throughout the GOP, the kind of failing company he just loves to turn around thanks to Bush and company. The moderates have been killing the party since Reagan’s second term ended, and the tea party was too dumb to rally around someone who could outmaneuver the establishment. Instead it was one flavor of the month after another throwing out a bunch of red meat. FORMER senator Santorum, a conservative turncoat turned lobbyist. FORMER Speaker Newt Gingrich, run out of office by his own party after pleading guilty to ethics charges, not to mention his numerous personal peccadilloes. Herman Cain with his adulterous past. Michelle Bachmann and her kooky comments. Ron Paul is polling second and third steadily. This party has lost its mind, and remember how you got to this point. The chance for a brokered convention at this point is slim to nil. You’re stuck with Romney. Check for yourself how much of the conservative media has suckled at his evil teats.

  • znjs

    It was that it would look like he didn’t know what he was doing. And if he couldn’t have predicted Newt melting down, well then I look for a little more foresight then that from Presidential candidate.

  • porkandcheese

    It’s not a vote for Newt, it’s a vote against Romney. It’s not a vote for Romney, it’s a vote against Obama. That’s where you are now, an Obama second term.

  • septembergurl

    Republican Party actually helps us in our goal of preventing Romney from winning the nomination.

    And let’s be clear — no amount of pressure from conservatives on choice of VP, platform, etc, is going to turn Romney into a candidate acceptable to conservatives.

    1. He is a terrible politician.
    2. He is not conservative.

    Not only is Romney apparently unable to win primaries/caucuses in states in the South or the Midwest (crucial to a Republican nominee and places where Obama did well in 2008 for a Democrap) but new polls in states he did win by large margins — New Hampshire and Florida — now give Obama a lead in head-to-heads with Romney in both states. Both states are crucial to a Republican win in November.

    This, coupled with the low turnout in Romney-won states is extremely ominous and should have even the most establishment Republicans worried.

    Now as to the fracturing of the party (quite obvious in the inability of conservatives to unify behind a single anti-Romney): This does not mean either that Romney will be the candidate inevitably, nor that the GOP is doomed to hand Obama a second term. On the contrary. It means a re-alignment is going on. It’s not like 1984, though that is what we were promised by conservative deep thinkers — a single candidate acceptable not only to the right but also to the Establishment, who would sweep Obama from office.

    This is because Republicans coalesced in response to Obama — libertarians, fiscal conservatives, constitutionalists, nationalists, social conservatives, yes even RINOs — but they did so in 2010, not 2012. This coalition has not re-formed in time for the 2012 election, so let’s move on.

    Look at the election of 1948 — the incumbent was broadly unpopular, the Republicans took Congress in 1946 and promptly overreached in dismantling the New Deal alienating labor, farmers, etc, the parties fractured along regional and ideological lines, the Republicans ended up nominating the equivalent of Romney and lost. (Partly due, incidentally, to some foreign policy successes by Truman — especially the success of the Berlin airlift, the equivalent of putting two caps in Bin Laden).

    But what if the Republicans had nominated someone other than Dewey — a guaranteed loser — like Taft or Stassen or some dark horse like Vanderberg?

    That’s where we stand today in my opinion. Our elites are timid and our populists are confused. But we don’t have to settle. Our process is actually much looser than people think.

    Earlier in the primary season I advocated supporting different anti-Romneys in different primaries/caucuses, since we were not going to be able to support a single candidate — Santorum in Iowa, Huntsman in NH, etc. In other words, Iproposed alliances of convenience with candidates we did not necessarily support in order to keep the process open. We see something like that happening now, as candidates who cannot build a national majority are able to carve out regional/ideological mini-majorities — Gingrich in the South, santorum in the Midwest and Rust Belt, Paul in various caucuses (Maine, perhaps WV, Washington, etc) and Romney in the Northeast and Wountain states as well as big media stateslike Florida and California.

    So that would bring us to the brokered convention. And the key word there is “broker”. The candidate would be acceptable to party elites, regional power brokers like Barbour and Christie, big state governors, as well as national leaders. So not Sarah Palin. So it would be someone like Romney in some ways, but someone who could run a plausible campaign against Obama and also keep the base on board.

  • porkandcheese

    How was the successful three term governor and executive of the 12th largest economy in the world intellectually deficient? If that’s the case, Mitt-For-Brains could use a chunk of Perry’s burned out noggin, since the only thing he’s ever been good at is destroying everything he touches. Oh, but “creative destruction.” You gotta bankrupt a bunch of AmPads before you invest the minimum in a Staples and then crow about the jobs you created — 10k in 1994 and 100k now!

  • JSobieski

    nt

  • porkandcheese

    “Audit the Fed… Policing the world… GOLD… JOOOOOOOS… Constitution!”

  • JSobieski

    Seriously, are you willing to condemn the country to an irreversible fade into the abyss?

  • Martin Knight

    He can use the media interviews to re-introduce himself to the GOP Primary electorate, issue some sort of mea culpa for his poor campaign i.e. listening more to campaign consultants than the people themselves, dealing in shallow slogans instead of talking in-depth about the issues that matter to the American people, etc.

    Then he needs to run a better campaign – first of all getting himself a better website, start getting on talk radio, doing more townhalls and interviews and putting them out where people can see them.

  • thosjefferson

    Ah, it finally makes sense. No wonder most Americans look at the so-called conservatives as lunatics. Thanks for helping to explain, apachecav!

  • porkandcheese

    This was what sensible people were saying from the get go. The rules have changed, and it’s a long slog to the nomination. You need a candidate with the resources to go the distance a la Huntsman or Perry. Newt will keep running until he has sold his last book. Santorum will get some deal from his old friend Romney. Anyone who can’t see how this ends still believes in the tooth fairy.

  • porkandcheese

    Ryan is exactly where he should be chairing the House Budget Committee. It is a very different role than POTUS, and I agree with him that he’s where he should be. Rubio is a first term Senator who knows he would get destroyed on the national stage going up against Obama. It takes preparation to run a national campaign, and Obama had an organization built up when he ran in 2008. He had been tagged as a candidate after giving a keynote address at the 2004 Democratic national convention. As much as I loved Rick Perry, he demonstrated that the temptation to run with a weak field is great when everyone is telling you the nomination’s a lock, but you have to be prepared. DeMint has always struck me as someone who enjoys playing kingmaker, because closer inspection of his record shows he is not all that conservative. He lets Lindsay Graham do the heavy lifting when it’s time to bring home the pork. McCain was right about that; pork spending and the revolving door between K Street, Wall Street and Congress are the real problems we face.

  • dumpbho2012

    ….Rubio to this list?

    Or has he already been eliminated from consideration due to the phony US Citizenship issue?

    I think a Rubio/Ryan ticket would be sweeeet.

    No baggage here, folks. Nothing for Oblahblah to pick on.
    And …. When Marco delivers a campaign speech “en Espanol”, forget it baby…. contest over. 50 state sweep.

  • pttx333

    for Ron Paul – EVER. Sir/ma’am, you are quite delusional if you believe that Paul ” is “the only candidate that truly defends the Constitution!” The last thing this country needs is another lunatic.

  • porkandcheese

    You have summed up many voters’ sentiments. Someone actually running to represent the people would be able to pick up on this.

  • porkandcheese

    NT

  • acat

    Wow.

    Mew

  • BA Cyclone

    The choice could be between two more Elena Kagans, or two more David Souters.

    I am not a defeatist or a cynic, but I am an experienced optimist.

    I can vote for Romney if I have to, but we all have to understand that we will be dragging him to the right kicking and screaming for at least four years.

    And that will make every House and Senate election all the more pivotal.

  • apachecav

    What part of the ?ad is the truth? do you not get?
    Romney can claim an 11th hour conversion all he wants
    But we all know it is Bull Squeeze, he is a slick greasy used car
    Salesmen that I wouldn?t trust any further than I could throw ..
    If you cannot see this this then you are either a troll for Mitt or a
    Democrat posing as a conservative, cause brother with language like that you are NOT

  • jakeofalltrades

    Rubio is awesome.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    do you think a brokered convention resulting in a new nominee would have on the left’s ability to attack during the 3 months before the election. Obviously, they’re prepared for any of our current nominees, but this strategy might slow them down a bit. Of course, the GOP would have to actually realize we need a strategy other than nominating a moderate in the first place.

  • porkandcheese

    Republicans let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Daniels saw in 2008 how the Republican candidate’s family is fair game, and he would not allow his wife and family to be savaged like Sarah Palin’s. I am as tired of Caribou Barbie as anyone now, but the media did a hatchet job on her. I lost much respect for John McCain for the way he let his campaign dump all over her at the end of the election. Look at the movie Game Change coming out now. Who would want to put their family through that? Who would even go through that themselves? Huntsman was photogenic, had a picture perfect family, a strong conservative record that he was loathe to talk about; maybe that’s why conservatives had the long knives out for him as soon as he got off the boat from China. “Worked for Obama” was enough to start Manchurian candidate RINO denunciations, and especially here at RedState. Even Rick Perry has to worry about his hide once he gets back to TX, and they loved him before “conservatives urged him to exit the race.”

  • porkandcheese

    But conservatives hate the media and lots of stuff, so good luck with that.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    than the POTUS? With the possible exception of Cantor, I don’t see much difference between Romney any you’ve mentioned. If that’s what you were aiming for, congratulations. You succeeded.

  • porkandcheese

    Mitt Romney was the Gov of neighboring MA and bought a home in NH, where he practically lived since 2008. Ron Paul also spent a great deal of time in NH since he ran in 2008. Huntsman held over 170 campaign events there and placed third, all while dividing his vote amongst the several other lesser known candidates there. I guess the lesson is to run for president and then run again.

  • acat

    That is, it’s making the point that Romney – as an establishment guy – is very likely to pick another establishment person as running mate.

    The upside to picking Cantor, to this cat’s mind, is that it’d let VA send someone better to the House. Cantor talks a good game, but when rubber meets road, he somehow ends up roadkill.

    Mew

  • znjs

    News anchor: “Rick Perry made the bizarre decision today to unsuspend his campaign 3 weeks after getting out and endorsing Newt Gingrich.”

    Perry: “I really made a mess of it, but starting now I’m going to listen to the people rather then campaign experts”

    “Polls do not show Perry doing any better then when he dropped out before South Carolina. Now on to sports”

  • acat

    #include
    #include
    main()
    {
    printf(“NT\n”);
    }

  • kipling

    Romney is not conservative but I am pretty sure he would not run an unconstitutional regime that ignores Congress and the Courts.

  • hobiecat

    That’s all Romney does. “Beat up on the other Rep. candidates”. Oh, and he’s worked in the private sector.

  • porkandcheese

    Romney wil appoint a Souter, if you’re lucky. Look at his history and his campaign staff. Sununu was his campaign chair in NH!

    Romney cannot issue waivers as president, so he’s lying. He has said over and over that he wants to keep the good parts of Obamacare and that Romneycare was a national model. When running against Ted Kennedy for the Senate in 1994, Romney represented himself as the champion of a free market health system: “I do not believe in a government takeover of the healthcare system.” After becoming Governor, however, his position changed so radically that he signed a health reform law that later became the model for Obamacare. Now, he claims to oppose Obama’s version of the plan, though the two laws are identical in all important respects. Romney would also have us believe that he will repeal Obamacare in its entirety. He has made this claim in virtually every Republican debate. “It’s bad medicine, it’s bad for the economy, and I will repeal it.” Predictably, this differs from what he said immediately after the law was passed: “I hope we’re ultimately able to? repeal the bad and keep the good.” It also conflicts with what his people are saying even now. During a recent interview one of Romney’s most important advisors said, “We’re not going to do repeal? but you will see major changes? You can’t whole-cloth throw it out. But you can substantially change what’s been done.”

    Romney hired illegal immigrants in MA and supported sanctuary cities. He even directed state dollars to MA’s five sanctuary cities.

    Romney is now a Catholic’s BFF? Not if they are pro-life and opposed to government meddling with their hospitals and charities. Look at Romney’s 2002 Planned Parenthood questionnaire:

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/mitt-romney-2002-planned-parenthood-questionnaire

    His flip flops on abortion are well documented, as well as his $50 copay for abortions under Romneycare. He also helped usher in gay marriage, and don’t try to weasel out of that one. No one for a second believes that Romney is committed to any principle so much as his own political survival. He will say anything for expediency’s sake, so try to give people other reasons to vote for him like, “It’s his turn. Obama cooties.”

  • porkandcheese

    Romney governed to te left of his legislature!

  • porkandcheese

    All of them. FOX and CNN are competing for the middle. MSNBC is still nuts.

  • porkandcheese

    I don’t think VA’s that nuts, but I’d love to be proved wrong.

  • porkandcheese

    I also respect their reasons for not running before. But it would be great to get them as nominees in a brokered convention.

  • porkandcheese

    He also gave the keynote address to the 50th annual JBS convention. He has made his career pandering to racists, Birchers and conspiracy theorists, himself pedaling thinly veiled antisemitic propaganda, not to mention going on Russian TV and giving pep talks for the mullahs. But don’t let that stop you from questioning Ron Paul’s sanity!

  • elayman

    But that doesn’t make the remaining candidates any more palatable. If getting a candidate virtually 100% in alignment with the Republican base and 100% assured of beating Obama is not more important than a few messaging or strategy flaws I don’t know what to say other than we 100% deserve the mess that we are in.

  • porkandcheese

    He only suspended. That’s exactly the definition of the word: “A temporary abrogation or cessation.”

    Better yet, get Newt to drop out and endorse Perry! Fair’s fair for the cause. The South was where Newt should have had no trouble winning, and TX is winner takes all 150 delegates. Perry would have been very competitive in NV where he was endorsed by Sandoval. He would appeal in the western states coming up.

  • porkandcheese

    I was just contributing to the completely fantastical nature of this diary.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    I’m never quite sure who’s serious and who’s not what with all the bots running around. There really should be a limit, don’t you think?

  • joeydavis

    For a number of months this election has been Romney v. notRomney. But little by little a new coalition is forming. It’s FOR Santorum.

    Hopefully tonight Santorum will win two, perhaps all three contests tonight is Purple to blue tinted states. When he does voters will then see a choice between Rick Santorum, who big government/compassionate conservative perhaps but who has always been a conservative and Mitt Romney, who say what he may, has not been.

    After scoring his 3rd swing state win in neutral territory, maybe the nonRomneys who make up most of Gingrich’s support will joing the ProSantorum’s and turn the tide. As the teaparty proved again and again in 2008 energy and enthusiasm united can, will and does trump money and establishment. All they have to do is get together.

    And don’t worry about Santorum in the general. He’s gonna do just fine. He’s won in Democratic dominant Pennsylvania 5 times. Hard right conservatives have won consistently in Ohio (Kasich) Wisconsin(Walker) Florida (Rubio) Virginia (Allen) and Pennsylvania (Santorum himself). He’ll also be successful in North Carolina and Indiana, 2 places where Romney will struggle with his ‘less than’ conservative credentials. Plus he will have proven stronger in Minnesota than sitting Republican governor.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Santorum Meteor of Death. Woe betide the fools who stay within it’s vast area of impact. There will be wailings and gnashing of teeth as BHO’s corrupt flunkies are tossed into the outer darkness.

    So….

    “If the Mitt don’t fit, then you gotta commit!” Santorum 2012.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …mercilessly

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    n/t

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …because of the need to maintain flexibility

  • clowngirl

    He was the head coach while I was growing up and for most of the years that I really paid attention and so I tend to associate him with the Broncos even more than Shanahan (who I didn’t particularly like)

    Of course, not all of the associations were good: I remember Reeves had this thing about ALWAYS running the ball on first down. Never struck me as the best plan.

    Tebow said he’d been approached but wasn’t going to endorse ( I think during the primary – he might’ve left it open for the general. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he endorses the eventual Republican nominee.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    News anchor: ?Rick Perry REACHED the UNPRECEDENTED decision today to unsuspend his campaign ONE MONTH after HAVING ENDORSED Newt Gingrich.?

    Perry: ?NEWT ENDORSED MY BOOK, THEN I ENDORSED HIM, THEN HE IS DROPPING-OUT TO ENDORSE ME. I LEARNED A LOT FROM THE FIRST EFFORT, AND WE NOW MUST BUILD UPON THE NEED TO LISTEN TO PEOPLE MORE THAN TO THE PUNDITS AND SO-CALLED EXPERTS.?

    ?Polls do not YET show Perry doing any better then when he dropped out before South Carolina. LET’S SEE HOW HE STACKS-UP AGAINST ROMNEY IN TEXAS NEXT WEEK….Now on to sports?

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    But this doesn’t mean we can’t reformulate, strategizing based upon knowledge of subsequent events.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …but i still think the brokering would turn towards someone who had participated in the debate-process.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …read my diary-input [and hyperlinks] regarding Santorum.

  • wingnut43

    Jeb has the wrong last name and Jindal and Rubio were flops in their first national prime time appearances. Ryan and McDonnell are viable, and McDonnell has been a pretty decent governor during the last 3 years. I’d go with McDonnell.

  • avagreen

    its skirts lifted and the hairy legs of a shape shifter has been found.

    Speaking of O’Really, he likes to (or did ….I don’t watch Fox any more) tout his being the most watched Fox program on the air.

    That’s like a passenger on the sinking Titanic bragging that his state room is the highest above the ever rising water line.

  • Dave_A

    The job of writing the repeal falls on Congress…

    It’s not hard to believe that Romney would sign a repeal (Assuming the Supreme Court doesn’t can the whole thing this summer), simply because he’d have to do it to get re-elected… No one wants to be a one-term President.

  • cbartlett

    These primaries (actually, elections, in general) take way too much money. If Perry had the funding to stay in longer, I think this public dissatisfation with the others might have forced a second look at the only one with conservative values. Face it – Mitt is the one with the money to stay in the longest – even if he has less than 50% of the votes all along. Unfortunately, I think he will run out of funding to fight the billions that Obama has to spend in the fall. Wonder if Perry’s CPAC speech could bring out the masses to storm the streets and demand him back? Sure wish someone would figure out a way to get him some positive national press, both before and after CPAC. Interviews on the stupid Fox show might even be worth it if they were at least a little bit fair. Heaven knows the liberal press in Texas has been bashing him left and right since he’s been back. What a surprise – IMO they have actually been a large contributor to the national press problem all along. You’d think his own state would be proud and supportive – but no-o-o-o-o-o-o-o…..

  • jakeofalltrades

    And I “fourth” the motion. I looked everywhere to see if Perry had campaign debt, and the only source I found said he had a few million in the bank after all was said and done.

    I think the reason he got out was 1) South Carolina, and 2) hordes of his former friends in the Roman Senate stabbed him in the back, including Brutus.

  • mike57

    Sorry I asked, but glad I asked…this stuff hasn’t gotten a lot of coverage, and neutralizes any poll that says that he is electable.

  • cbartlett

    They are changing the date of our primary almost daily because re-districting maps are still not set. The Attorney General, leaders from both parties, about 40 different minority-type organizations, 3 or 4 courts (including SCOTUS) and who knows who else, are all still fighting about this. We are definitely NOT Super Tuesday in March; hopefully April 3, but notifications I received last night said most likely later – probably mid to late April. This is truly a mess. Not sure we’ll get any say-so in this election at all.

  • whitehorse1

    Howdy ya’ll as seeing the introduction here I believe you kinda know where I might stand. Concerning the posting of today on the subject of this nation’s presidential republican hopefuls for the 2012 election. I agree with the author of today’s posting that the playing field of the candidates is very limited. Although considering what their opponent has done the bar hasn’t got to be that high. But considering the results of what has transpired over the past 4 years. I’m wondering why a candidate hasn’t stepped to the plate to commit their self to improving the status of America in the world theater. To the position it once
    held before aspects of it’s actions caused our decline. Which was basically caused by a government which needs a major overhaul and a media service which is intervening in areas that should be left alone beyond public knowledge.

  • ihateliberals

    The liberal Republican Party establishment has decided that Romney is their boy and nothing is going to stop that not even the voters. In 1980 they got caught with their pants down when they were pushing George Bush and the voters chose Reagan. They swore that would not happen again and so far they have been successful. we have not had a conservative nominee since Reagan. The problem now is that this is the most important election in our history and the Party is throwing us under the Bus. I have as much chance of wining against Obama as Romney has and I’m not running. The only chance he has is if the economy not only gets worse but crashes.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Although people say much worse stuff about McDummy.

  • tngal

    You asked for:

    Vetted?
    prepared on issues?
    ready to debate?
    can get an organization and money?
    can unite various factions?

    On the CPAC speakers site is the pics and names of everyone speaking. Of course you’ll recoginze all our candidates and former candidates on there but there is a throng of othes who might be good. I wouldn’t go for Ann Coulter or the woman whose on 18 kids and counting, but since its a ‘conservative’ convention there’s definately more than a few conservatives in there (and several who just claim to be. )

    http://cpac2012.conservative.org/cpac-2012-speakers/

  • johnwerneken

    Economics 101 Obama knows not and this puts our country in peril, or at least gives us five more years of recession regulation deficit debt declining dollar and the threat of 1929, 1939, and 1861 repeating, perhaps all at the same time. The SMOD is about the only thing worse than more Obama; just as the only thing worse than Romney, is more Obama.

    I am a Democrat but of the Scoop Jackson variety: defense, infrastructure, limited regulation, basic safety net, balanced budgets over the economic cycle, strong dollar. Freedom and Equal Opportunity and Constitutional Government.

    Perhaps just maybe the Republican Party with a “brokered convention” might listen to the voices of the people, of all parties and of no party: SAVE OUR COUNTRY! There are plenty of experienced Republican leaders out there, with good reputations and strong records. Mitch Daniels, Chris Christy, Jeb Bush. Someone like that, with real public executive experience.

  • JSobieski

    and received relatively few will yield to the logic of picking the person with the most delegates.

    Presuming that Romney has the most delegates, the logic will either be: (1) Romney is a failed candidate so we need someone else who was not a candidate (in which case Perry is also a failed candidate) or (2) Two people with delegates combine and people support that team.

    (2) is unappealing, as it would pair (presumably) Romney with someone like Santorum. I however am hoping for scenario (1).

  • JSobieski

    They already have commercials of a Paul Ryan look-a-like throwing grandma off a cliff.

    I do think that the media will so enjoy a brokered convention that it will distract the MSM hounds for a while.

  • lapert

    He is best known as a player for letting the pass in Super Bowl V go through his hands that was intercepted leading to the game winning field goal. He has been to 9 super bowls as a player, assistant and head coach and lost 7 including all four as a head coach the last one to the QB that ran him out of town.

    And the real kicker, he is the only person on earth to twice be replaced by Wade Phillips.

    And it would be quite surprising for Tebow to endorse anyone – it just isn’t smart to piss off half your fan base regardless of which half.

  • znjs

    but think that this time will be different, and you’re adding that Newt is going to drop out.

  • http://www.voteforteri2010.com teridavisnewman

    Imagine a Barack Obama that never has to worry about facing the voters again. Imagine the Supreme Court with two more Kagan Clones and 4 more years of the corruption that saturated this administration with Holder as AG, Napolitano, Sibelius, and “green” jobs that don’t exist. It simply cannot be allowed to happen. NO MATTER WHAT, OBAMA MUST NOT BE RE-ELECTED. If that happens, America as we have know it will cease to exist. As it stands, it will take years to undo the damage Obama’s incompetence has wrought upon our beloved America. I am pleased to see so many motivated and like-minded patriots on these boards, because we are on a mission and we must not falter and we cannot fail. The future of America depends upon all of us to get out the vote, donate what we can afford and spread the word far and wide until November 6, 2012 when we find out what the future holds for the America we all love. The blood of my family stains foreign soil from WWI to Iraq and they left it there for the freedom we all share. Obama wipes his hiney with the most sacred document since the Holy Bible and I will not stand idly by and watch this happen while I am still breathing, God forbid he wins a second term!

  • Ausonius

    News item from Reuters on Drudge this evening:

    Salient section:

    But U.S. investigators have found little to substantiate allegations of phone hacking inside the United States by Murdoch journalists, the sources added.

    The FBI is conducting an investigation into possible criminal violations by Murdoch employees of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), a law intended to curb payment of bribes by U.S. companies to foreign officials, a U.S. law enforcement official said.

    The U.S. official said that if any law enforcement action was pursued by U.S. authorities against Murdoch employees, it would most likely relate to FCPA.

    If it is found to have violated the FCPA, Murdoch’s News Corp, which has its headquarters in New York, could be fined up to $2 million and barred from U.S. government contracts, and individuals who participated in the bribery could face fines of up to $100,000 and a jail sentence of five years.

    Executives could be liable if they authorized bribes or knew about the practice but failed to stop it.

    In practice, U.S. authorities have usually settled FCPA cases in return for large cash payments from companies, who can sometimes avoid legal admissions of guilt.

    My emphasis above!

    See:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/us-usa-murdoch-investigation-idUSTRE81616620120207

  • wingnut43

    Romney has numerous problems that are only slowly coming out. His recent comment about indexing the minimum wage makes me just want to scream. Like many super rich people, Romney is very defensive about his wealth, and so he over-corrects by adopting leftist positions.

  • wingnut43

    The filing deadlines are already history. Sarah Palin could emerge at a brokered convention, although I would bet on McDonnell as more likely.

  • wingnut43

    If the economy crashes and burns, personal fear for survival will take over and everyone will want to elect the safest president, and that means siding with the money printers. The Democrats are proven to be the money printing party, and it won’t matter if Obama gets the blame. He will be reelected anyway.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    The delegates at a Republican convention are by inclination conservative. It is the voters who tie them to a candidate. On their own, they are more than likely to support a conservative. There is a misconception that “the establishment” keeps tying the Republican nominee to a moderate. That is simply not the case, it is the voters. Republican primary voters nominated G.H.W. Bush twice, they nominated Bob Dole, they nominated GW Bush twice and they nominated John McCain. The moderates Republicans who vote in primaries in Massachusetts, Florida and California count as much or more as the conservatives in Tennessee, South Carolina, and Alabama. A brokered convention takes the nomination out of the hands of those pesky voters. As a small government conservative, I don’t know whether to loudly applaud EE’s brilliance or mourn the fact such shenanigans are necessary to nominate a small government fiscal conservative.

  • acat

    is that a candidate and running mate, selected not elected, and without any real campaign organization in place or active grass roots, are going to have a much harder time.

    Further, and EE has mentioned this, there’s a number of Romney delegates who, as recently as 2008, were fervent Ron Paul supporters. Since, after the first vote, those potential “faithless delegates” will be free to do whatever they like, I don’t know that I’d bet on getting a good result.

    What do you think of the Mitch Daniels / Rand Paul ticket? How about the Tim Pawlenty / Rand Paul ticket? Haley Barbour / Rand Paul?

    Just sayin’

    Mew

  • olds88er

    Erick bitches about the poor Republican field. I am also not thrilled about it. But Erick, it’s easy to bitch but you don’t have the cojones to enter and try to convince us that you would make a great President. I ran against an incumbent County Supervisor and won here in San Diego. So get off your fat butt, Erick, and try to convince the Republicans that they should vote for you.

  • olds88er

    Agree totally!

  • olds88er

    I may be one of the few on this site who was a California delegate for Reagan in 1976.It is not easy to win nomination at a convention if you don’t have enough votes. If Romney goes with a large number of delegates he can probably gain enough to win the nomination. Face it, he has the capital and organization to fight Obama for the Presidency. The VP choice would be crucial. That is where Reagan lost the nomination.

  • olds88er

    Rush lives in Palm Beach, Fl. and makes multi millions a year. He won’t give that up. Same for Pailin. And Rush could not pick Rubio as his VP.

  • olds88er

    Rand Paul for VP would be great as he would bring in the Ron Paul nuts without the head nut. Hailey Barbour is out because of those pardons. His political life is over. Marco Rubio would be better as he would guarantee Florida and bring in Latins from all over the country.

  • olds88er

    Just what foreign experience did Obama have when he first ran? He never even ran a one man hot dog stand. And his Presidential record is God awful!

  • olds88er

    How many kids do you have, Buster? Romney has five. I also have five. Five kids, a wife, luggage, pretty much fills the car. And I am pretty sure he did NOT “strap the family dog on the roof”. He was probably in a container. Give us a break!

  • olds88er

    I worked my butt off for Reagan in 1965. Were you there, Buster> Didn’t see you.

  • olds88er

    As a Tea Partier since 2009, I totally agree.

  • olds88er

    Pardon me! A Republican getting elected Governor of Mass. is “failed political activity”?Give me a break!

  • olds88er

    Married women always wonder if their husband is cheating on them. Statistics show that they are around 50% right. Newt did not do well in Florida because married women will not vote for a serial adulterer. And it did not help that serial sexual harasser Cain endorsed him.

  • Dave_A

    Because that battle has been pretty-well won in the Supreme Court & state legislatures….

    We have only 1 no-carry state left (Illinois), the Brady folks are almost bankrupt, Obama hasn’t even tried to ban anything, and with the DC and Chicago rulings, the ‘main front’ shifted to the courts…..

    There’s essentially nothing to ‘do’ at the federal level, as all of the remaining problematic laws are state and local, and there is no real credible ‘push’ for new federal gun control…

  • Dave_A

    You’re way out in left field on war/the NDAA/Patriot…

    The fact is, Ron’s positions are explicitly designed to crash the US economy and destroy (not shrink, but destroy) the US government.

    Obama, at least, can be seen as an ignorant liberal who thinks his plans will help us and is completely blind to the destruction he would cause…

    There’s NO room for that with Ron. Ron wants America destroyed, and knows his positions would do the job if he ever got the chance….

  • davesinsanantonio

    at every opportunity.

    It is sheep who stay home and bleat!

  • davesinsanantonio

    than to have Obummer dragging the country to the left choking and dying!!!!!

  • romansdaughter

    far right wingers now? That maybe Mittens needs them after all?

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Put like that, I’ll take Mitch Daniels and Rand Paul for 100, Alex. That ticket would have the side benefit of improving my prayer life as I would be praying often for Mitch Daniels’ good health. I am little less concerned about the grass roots and organization than you are because the only candidate with an organization in every state is Mitt Romney and he has no grass roots support. Gingrich has pretty much said building a traditional campaign is beneath him and Santorum hasn’t had the financial backing. Any Republican nominee is going to have a tremendous financial windfall with the Super PACS (and no Barack Obama is not going to raise 1 billion dollars, he isn’t even going to raise the 750 million he raised last time). Combine that money with a candidate the base doesn’t have to hold their nose to support (or in some cases sacrifice their principals and David Axelrod will not be sleeping well at night).

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Daniels/Paul would be my first choice…

  • bluerose75

    Anyone that thinks last night was not a big deal for Santorum and a big judo chop to the tin suit well I have some beachfront property on the Moon to sell you!!

    I heard some references that less were small states? Are you kidding? Missouri and Colorado are key battleground states and Minnesota is becoming one. Both Missouri and Minnesota are states the big electoral votes as well. Romney thought he would easily coast in Colorado…in 2008 he received 61 percent of the Caucus vote, last night 22 percent!! He advertised in Minnesota against Santorum and had his clock cleaned. Of course, the tin suit tried to downplay his spanking!!

    In Nevada, he won and he was cheerleading his front runner status…well Colorado has more delegates then Nevada buddy!! It is a foreboding indicator that conservatives are uniting and getting sick of this phony liberal!

    Rick did very well and I applaud his speech last night when he emphasized he being the “Conservative” to Obama!! I liked that! He also referenced Obama’s superiority attitude and his ARROGANCE in deciding what is best for all of us!

    Obama’s Catholic battle over forcing Catholic Institutions to cover areas in their health care programs that are in direct conflict with their religious teachings is going to be a DISASTER for Obama. Obama better remember older Catholics that vote all the time, usually Democrat, will be hit omn Sundays’ by the Pastors and Bishops about Obama’s forcing the Church to fund issues many are opposed to and go against their faith. BIG MISTAKE for OBAMA!! This is a natural fit for Santorum!!

    I like Rick, I like Newt, I like both ten times more then the tin suit. I agree with Erick….the “very poor” remark is starting to sink in and it is already hurting Mitt. He has dropped in national polls by over 5-7 percent! He is a fraud!

    Rick and Newt should work together to advocate the Conservative principles and ideals!!

    The race is blown open and Mitt now has been exposed and moving forward Conservatives are going to be energized to defeat this liberal and GOP Estbalishment candidate.

    Congrats Rick on doing a great job. Yes you are not perfect but you have true conservatives principles. YOU DID NOT FIND CONSERVATISM as a matter of convernience or election desire!

    Mitt craves power and his nasty campaign in Florida showed just how deceitful and power hungry he is!!

    I was loving seeing him look so small last night after acting like he was the “CHOSEN ONE”…sorry Mitt you are a loser and you will not win the nomination. The South will be less kind to you than the voters last night!

    Make no bones about it Rick will have great headlines all week and Mitt looks weak!! I love it!

  • acat

    Ironically, Daniels would have been one of my early (2011) choices, had he decided to run.

    I continue to hold a little hope that Rand Paul does, in fact, fall far enough from the tree… and quite a lot of hope that the veep slot is still just as useful as a pitcher of warm spit. (with apologies to Nance Garner)

    We’re going to get a compromise ticket, with no promises that it’ll be better than the current tickets. Romney/Rubio would be a waste of a great Senator, eh?

    Mew

  • colleenlass

    Oh how wrong you are.
    Mitt will be the nominee, there is no doubt about it.
    With each setback..he comes back stronger.
    I like Mitt…everyone I know likes Mitt.

    Watch……………………………

  • snowshooze

    We all one, big happy family.