Santorum and the Democrats. Outrage! Outrage, I Tell You!!


The latest outrage pushed by Team Romney is that Rick Santorum is running auto-calls asking Democrats in Michigan to support him. How dare he!

Of course, Romney will do the same in the general election. It’s what we’re supposed to do. But right now it is somehow dirty — unless Romney had to do it, then it’d be a-okay with Romney supporters. Look at all those independent and moderate voters he got in New Hampshire and Florida. Those cross overs were just fine because they were Romney.

The fact is, Mitt Romney went after Rick Perry for Perry rightly calling social security a ponzi scheme and many Romney supporters suddenly thought social security was pure as the driven snow. How dare Milton Friedman, Mitch Daniels, Rick Perry, and so many others call social security what it definitionally is.

Then Mitt Romney started praising Arne Duncan and Race to the Top as a way to claim Rick Perry had destroyed Texas schools. And the Romney fans piled on too in praise of Race to the Top.

Then, of course, Mitt Romney unveiled a tax plan that only gave the middle class capital gains tax breaks, supported automatic adjustments of the minimum wage, and recently praised the progressive nature of the tax code while adopting Obama’s class warfare rhetoric to make sure people knew he still wanted the rich to pay their fair share.

But God help us, Rick Santorum wants Democrats in Michigan to vote for him.

Spare me the outrage.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

230 Comments Leave a comment

Spot on. -nt-

Bill S (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:35PM EDT (link)

.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

yet I don't understand

angryguy77 Tuesday, February 28th at 2:35PM EDT (link)

Why we are supposed to vote for Mittens if he’s the nominee.
Obama is so bad, how is someone who is only slightly better worth putting aside principles for a victory?

+5

redcal Tuesday, February 28th at 3:08PM EDT (link)

If Santorum and Romney are equally electable against Obama, as the last month of polls have implied, I’d rather take my chances with my principles intact.

Wrong..

chadosborne Tuesday, February 28th at 4:28PM EDT (link)

Hmm, here are the latest Gallup matchups:

Romney 50%
Obama 46%

Obama 49%
Santorum 48%

http://www.gallup.com/poll/election.aspx

Small difference between victory and defeat.

The democrats are not voting for Santorum because of his reputation as a pro-union, big government candidate.

They are voting for him because they know he can’t win. No man will be elected president by saying that kids should not go to college.

 
 

Romney is reframing..

chadosborne Tuesday, February 28th at 4:19PM EDT (link)

He is laying the groundwork to be able to declare victory among republican voters, even if Santorum pulls off a narrow win with the inclusion of democrats.

The critics will have a hard time pushing the narrative that Romney is not conservative enough, can’t connect with republicans, etc.. if he only loses because of democrat crossover vote.

Romney might even be able to turn it around and attack Santorum as a democrat straw candidate. But overall, if the exit polls show that Romney won among republicans he’ll be able to declare victory and portray Santorum as the Obama candidate.

 

Tone down the anger

Flagstaff (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:54PM EDT (link)

and think about what you wrote.

“how is someone who is only slightly better worth putting aside principles for a victory?”

Romney is far from “only slightly better” than Obama. And you don’t have to put aside your principles. If you WANT to know about putting aside your principles, study Rick Santorum. He himself says that he did it many times when he was a congresscritter. “Took one for the team.” “Sorry I voted for NCLB.” I could go on. Maybe Ron Paul isn’t guilty, too, but I doubt it.

I know there is antipathy towards Romney because of Romneycare, but RC came about because there was pressure FOR it in Massachusetts. There is NO reason to believe national health insurance/takeover would have been pushed by a President Romney at any time, nor is there a reason to believe that he won’t do exactly what he says when elected–repeal Obamacare.

We need to get away from the meme that compromise is a dirty word. It was one of the best words in Reagan’s lexicon; he just made sure the compromise was mostly on the other side (except when he agreed to raise taxes before spending was cut).

I can guarantee only two things about the next president. Whoever it is, he won’t be good enough for anybody, and he will NOT do everything the way we want it done on the right.

Buffett Rule #1: “Tax rates don’t matter if you don’t pay your taxes”
– Unnamed tax adviser to Warren Buffett, Leavenworth, KS, 2011
Buffett Rule #2: “A parrot in every pot and two Volts in every garage”– Jimmy Buffett, at a seance in Margaritaville, 1977

Truth. -nt-

Bill S (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:55PM EDT (link)

..

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 

Nice try Flagstaff...but as they say in my neck of the woods...That dog won't hunt.

AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 8:06PM EDT (link)

There is NO reason to believe national health insurance/takeover would have been pushed by a President Romney at any time, nor is there a reason to believe that he won’t do exactly what he says when elected–repeal Obamacare.

The problem here is, Romney doesn’t say he’ll repeal Obamacare…her says he’ll issue waivers to states to allow them to opt out of the individual mandates…and he also has said he wants to reapel the bad “PARTS” of Obamacare…and “KEEP THE GOOD PARTS”.

As for this little gem…you make an excellent point.

If you WANT to know about putting aside your principles, study Rick Santorum.

We’ll never have to worry about Romney setting aside his principles because he doesn’t have any. He’s an unprincipled hack who doesn’t know what he believes till his polster and his team of spin misters tell him what he believes….he’s as changeable as the wind.

and finally:

We need to get away from the meme that compromise is a dirty word. It was one of the best words in Reagan’s lexicon; he just made sure the compromise was mostly on the other side

How did that line of thinking work out for Ford, GHW Bush, Dole and McCain?

I’d laugh at the hilarity of that comment if it weren’t so tragic seeing anyone hanging on desperately to a meme that has proven not once, not twice, but in four separate elections in 20 years.

MarkTwain 3

That's so odd.

Flagstaff (Diary) Thursday, March 1st at 12:55AM EDT (link)

I distinctly heard him say, several times, in public, that he would “repeal Obamacare.” He also said that he’d issue those waivers you mentioned. Think about it. The President can’t repeal anything’ it takes Congress to do that. And it takes time. So first, issue the waivers. Second, push for repeal, which won’t be hard if we elect a conservative Congress.

More oddity: Romney’s

“an unprincipled hack who doesn’t know what he believes till his polster and his team of spin misters tell him what he believes….he’s as changeable as the wind.”

Funny how he won’t change his stand on Romney care. It would have been so easy to do that, so helpful to him politically. Yet he didn’t. Why wouldn’t “an unprincipled hack” just change his mind, like the staunch, principled conservative Mike DeWine did?

On compromise:

“How did that line of thinking work out for Ford, GHW Bush, Dole and McCain?”

Three of the four are non-sequiturs. GHW Bush shot off his mouth and then didn’t follow through, but all four had problems because of their own failings and situations, not because they compromised. If you think there can be a Presidency that accomplishes anything good without compromise, remember it would also have to be one without any effective opposition in Congress. And that would be the Obama administration, wouldn’t it?

From a political science standpoint, compromise is what gives a representative democracy its legitimacy. Without it, we are just electing a string of dictators.

Buffett Rule #1: “Tax rates don’t matter if you don’t pay your taxes”
– Unnamed tax adviser to Warren Buffett, Leavenworth, KS, 2011
Buffett Rule #2: “A parrot in every pot and two Volts in every garage”– Jimmy Buffett, at a seance in Margaritaville, 1977

Romney said he would repeal Obamacare

Patrish Thursday, March 1st at 1:06AM EDT (link)

Ace, please start paying attention.

Pat T.

I don't recognise your name patrish...but here is a pointer for you

AceInTX (Diary) Thursday, March 1st at 11:28PM EDT (link)

I rarely make a comment like I did above without having something to back me up…my answer to your post about paying attention is posted directly below my reply to you here.

you’ll love the point Mittens makes at the 1:47 mark….when your boy said the following:

”I hope we’re ultimately able to eliminate some of the differences, and repeal the bad and keep the good.”

Now…maybe where you come from…that adds up to Mitt wanting to repeal Obama Care…..down here in Texas….when someone says they want to keep the good parts….we kind of take that to mean he want’s to keep parts of it.

Now…who’s not paying attention?

MarkTwain 3

Ace...ghost [nt]

lineholder (Diary) Thursday, March 1st at 11:31PM EDT (link)

Ace, I had a similar exchange with Patrish

Melody Warbington (rwm52) (Diary) Friday, March 2nd at 12:22AM EDT (link)

here. Posted the same money quote and video. What’s that saying about great minds? LOL.

The woman saith unto him, I know that Messiah cometh (he that is called Christ): when he is come, he will declare unto us all things. (John 4:25)

 
 
 

Romney has said a lot of things and then just the oposite...he just said recently that he wants to repeal the bad parts and keep the good...

AceInTX (Diary) Thursday, March 1st at 11:22PM EDT (link)

Pay close attention to the 1:47 mark when Willard “The Rat” said the following….In his own words:

”I hope we’re ultimately able to eliminate some of the differences, and repeal the bad and keep the good.”

MarkTwain 3

DOH!!!

AceInTX (Diary) Thursday, March 1st at 11:28PM EDT (link)

April 2010

Flagstaff (Diary) Saturday, March 3rd at 2:19PM EDT (link)

To answer my own question.

More recently, he has said he will repeal Ocare. Unequivocally.

Buffett Rule #1: “Tax rates don’t matter if you don’t pay your taxes”
– Unnamed tax adviser to Warren Buffett, Leavenworth, KS, 2011
Buffett Rule #2: “A parrot in every pot and two Volts in every garage”– Jimmy Buffett, at a seance in Margaritaville, 1977

Cite please, Flagstaff.

acat (Diary) Sunday, March 4th at 1:06AM EDT (link)

I want to compare the date of his unequivocal pledge to repeal with the date his buddy Norm Coleman said the next POTUS will end up keeping Obamacare.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

I heard him say it, live on TV,

Flagstaff (Diary) Sunday, March 4th at 1:21AM EDT (link)

within the last week. May have been in the AZ debate. Sorry, but I can’t mentally catalogue everything I hear and see. I try my darnedest, but it just won’t keep.

Buffett Rule #1: “Tax rates don’t matter if you don’t pay your taxes”
– Unnamed tax adviser to Warren Buffett, Leavenworth, KS, 2011
Buffett Rule #2: “A parrot in every pot and two Volts in every garage”– Jimmy Buffett, at a seance in Margaritaville, 1977

 

The info is here:

Flagstaff (Diary) Sunday, March 4th at 2:21AM EDT (link)

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/03/03/further-proof-romney-supported-a-national-individual-mandate-in-2009/#comment-175165

Buffett Rule #1: “Tax rates don’t matter if you don’t pay your taxes”
– Unnamed tax adviser to Warren Buffett, Leavenworth, KS, 2011
Buffett Rule #2: “A parrot in every pot and two Volts in every garage”– Jimmy Buffett, at a seance in Margaritaville, 1977

The replies to it are interesting, to say the least, Flagstaff.

acat (Diary) Sunday, March 4th at 12:22PM EDT (link)

I’ll go ahead and echo Dr. Bob here.

Romney proposes to repeal Obamacare for a variety of reasons, most of them having nothing to do with conservatism.

Romney seems to have no problem with the mandate or other forms of invasive federal overreach, and appears to be reacting simply to remove the named item.

Based on the continued presence of Norm Coleman on Romney’s team, I have no reason to believe we won’t see Obamacare replaced with an equally odious (but differently named) big-government program.

My hypothesis is that the Romney campaign, being made up of northeasterners and D.C. insiders, didn’t really appreciate the level of grass roots frustration around Obamacare … and that this is causing ongoing messaging problems for the campaign.

The interesting thing about the AZ debate you cite, by the way, is that it took place on Feb. 23, 2012, less than 30 days after the firestorm over Norm Coleman’s comments. I think the Coleman thing is what finally got Team Romney on the right page … but the continued presence of Coleman on Team Romney tells me they’ve just tweaked the messaging, they haven’t changed their minds at all….

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

And how would that happen?

Flagstaff (Diary) Thursday, March 8th at 1:54AM EDT (link)

“Based on the continued presence of Norm Coleman on Romney’s team, I have no reason to believe we won’t see Obamacare replaced with an equally odious (but differently named) big-government program.”

Even in a Romney administration, wouldn’t it have to go through Congress?

And yes, I don’t like that idea either, because ALL of them have talked about repeal and replace, not just repeal. So make sure we get conservatives in Congress who won’t go along to get along, no matter who is in the White House.

Buffett Rule #1: “Tax rates don’t matter if you don’t pay your taxes”
– Unnamed tax adviser to Warren Buffett, Leavenworth, KS, 2011
Buffett Rule #2: “A parrot in every pot and two Volts in every garage”– Jimmy Buffett, at a seance in Margaritaville, 1977

 
 
 
 
 
 

When was this interview conducted?

Flagstaff (Diary) Saturday, March 3rd at 1:46PM EDT (link)

Is it more recent than his statements that he will repeal Ocare? I’ll try to find a date.

“…I like SOME of the similarities, I dislike most of the differences between my plan and their plan….”

Sounds like Obamcare was still a “plan,” but maybe not.

Personally, I don’t even like most of the similarities he mentions.

I agree that I wish he were more adamantly against Obamacare. But a big thing he dislikes is the cost, which is the single biggest thing wrong with Ocare beyond its unconstitutionality.

Buffett Rule #1: “Tax rates don’t matter if you don’t pay your taxes”
– Unnamed tax adviser to Warren Buffett, Leavenworth, KS, 2011
Buffett Rule #2: “A parrot in every pot and two Volts in every garage”– Jimmy Buffett, at a seance in Margaritaville, 1977

He's not talking about a plan flagstaff or he'd not be talking about repealing anything let alone keeping the good

AceInTX (Diary) Saturday, March 3rd at 11:56PM EDT (link)

seriously…how can you believe anything the man says because he’ll turn around and say the opposite tomorrow….

You are showing exactly why I won’t even try to defend him in the General if he win’s the nomination because no matter what you say to defend him today…he’ll leave you twisting in the wind when he changes positions tomorrow!

MarkTwain 3

 

But in April 2010, it was still a plan.

Flagstaff (Diary) Sunday, March 4th at 12:56AM EDT (link)

It wasn’t passed until 2011. I found the clip on youtube. That is the date given there. It may have been pretty far along in April, though. I don’t remember.

Buffett Rule #1: “Tax rates don’t matter if you don’t pay your taxes”
– Unnamed tax adviser to Warren Buffett, Leavenworth, KS, 2011
Buffett Rule #2: “A parrot in every pot and two Volts in every garage”– Jimmy Buffett, at a seance in Margaritaville, 1977

 
 
 

You make a good point Flagstaff Why is the only issue Romney has decided to be consistent on is the bureaucratic health care mandate

AceInTX (Diary) Friday, March 2nd at 12:00AM EDT (link)

…..that he foisted on the people of Massachusetts?

MarkTwain 3

In the video, Romney uses the word "incentive" to describe a "mandate"

JSobieski (Diary) Friday, March 2nd at 12:56AM EDT (link)

Kind of like when D’s use “contributions” to describe “taxes” or “investment” to describe “pork”.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

 
 
 
 
 
 

The Romney Disaster

northeastred Tuesday, February 28th at 11:56PM EDT (link)

I’m sure Mitt will go back in his oak room with his lobbyist friends and have a good laugh about pulling one over on those Nascar knucklehead conservatives. Every time he opens his mouth, you get the feeling he’s trying to fool the people. Newt should get out now and throw his support behind Santorum. It’s the only chance. Mitt may poll well, but head to head, Obama is going to destroy him the same way McCain did. It’s inevitable.

Putting the dom in freedom. Keeping the ice in justice. Squeezing the lib out of liberty.

 
 

Santorum is a Joke, EE

mikelindell2 Tuesday, February 28th at 1:36PM EDT (link)

If Santorum’s only path to victory in a REPUBLICAN primary is to solicit Democrats to vote for him and by attacking Romney for not supporting the auto bailout, he should not be the nominee. I don’t like Romney either, but Santorum is just as much of a fake conservative as Romney is. Enough with these two fake conservatives, let’s give Newt one more comeback.

When Michael Moore and DailyKos want Dems to vote Santorum,

mikelindell2 Tuesday, February 28th at 1:53PM EDT (link)

you know there’s a problem with the candidate and the process.

Sure, they think they can beat him.

littlehouse18 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:33PM EDT (link)

So do we automatically accept their analysis?

They think they can beat him

gabs Tuesday, February 28th at 5:39PM EDT (link)

because the numbers say so. Santorum’s “people skills” are unlikely to change enough between now and the general that those numbers will change.

 
 
 

Newt is admitting defeat in Afghanistan...

Creedo Tuesday, February 28th at 3:50PM EDT (link)

How can you trust a guy who is ready to tuck tail and run in Afghanistan now that his campaign is on the ropes?

http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/gingrich-sees-impossible-task-1364582.html

I doubt even Romney would do this.

I would ask if you actually read his comments

rogershru2 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:58PM EDT (link)

But I doubt you would understand them if you did.

“We used to have the best infrastructure in the world here in America. We’re the country that built the Intercontinental Railroad …” – President Obama

 

That's a pretty severe distortion

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:01PM EDT (link)

of what Gingrich said. I tend to agree with him. Afghanistan is a s#$t hole because that’s the way Afghans want it. Leave them to their misery.

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

That doesn't change the fact that we can't just leave

Creedo Tuesday, February 28th at 4:08PM EDT (link)

I don’ think it’s a distortion at all. We can’t just ‘leave them to their misery.’ Their misery ends up with OUR buildings blown up. Admitting defeat in Afghanistan and leaving it to the terrorists is not an option.

The current situation in the rockpile is not sustainable, Creedo.

acat (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:18PM EDT (link)

The question is what to do about it… and hammering Gingrich’s proposal without supplying an alternative is taking a very lazy way out.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Just yesterday you said you'd vote for the Green's over Ron Paul

Creedo Tuesday, February 28th at 6:15PM EDT (link)

Now you’re supporting his solution for Afghanistan. I don’t have all the answers, but what I do know is that leaving Afghanistan in ruin to the terrorists is defeat. We went there with a mission, and leaving before the mission is complete is the “lazy way out” IMO.

I’d rather hear Gingrich come up with a plan for victory consulting the generals there, define what that victory is, and then achieve it. But just throwing up our hands and leaving brings dishonor to those who sacrificed their lives and makes it MUCH more difficult for us to send our troops in aid of Isreal the next time we need to do it because of the political barriers that get raised once we turn our backs on the mission we started but didn’t have the resolve to complete.

Creedo, do you have a learning disability?

acat (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:31PM EDT (link)

You clearly can’t read for content.

I said that your opposition to the Gingrich plan, in the absence of any proposal for a better plan, is weak.

I see that you don’t really *have* a better plan – you’re instead substituting the Obama “look busy and maybe a plan will appear” nonsense.

Let me know when you get your head out of wherever you have it shoved, learn something about the Afghan theater, and can speak intelligently. Until then, all you’re doing is further confirming your lack of substance.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Ouch!

WillWong (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 7:09PM EDT (link)
 

My plan doesn't matter. Newt's plan does.

Creedo Tuesday, February 28th at 8:38PM EDT (link)

And right now that plan is to admit defeat, tuck tail, and run home.

Your decision to parade your ignorance, Creedo, does matter.

acat (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 10:17PM EDT (link)

Specifically, it proves that you aren’t qualified to judge any plan, and are just “going with your gut”.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Be fair kitty. Creedo does NOT have a learning disability.

mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 10:24PM EDT (link)

He is class A stupid.

Change

 
 
 

MeeeeeeOW!

rightland1111 Saturday, March 3rd at 2:55PM EDT (link)

Good Kitty

 
 

What frakking mission?

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 10:37AM EDT (link)

Turning Afghanistan into a stable democracy? Because that’s just frakking impossible, and has everything to do with a medieval culture and no imminent mechanisms to change this. “The generals”, including McKiernan, advised against a surge. There is no dishonor in cutting our losses: IMO, the dishonor is in continuing to throw good lives and money into a hole with no way out and no improvement. Do you value your pride over the lives of our servicemen? That’s the way it sounds to me.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

Oh, yeah

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 10:39AM EDT (link)

and the “next time” we send our troops in the aid of Israel will be the first. Israel has handled itself just fine without our direct aid in its various conflicts for the, oh, 60+ years it’s been around.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 

The same people who are most concerned about Sharia law in the US

JSobieski (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 12:52PM EDT (link)

seemed to ignore its significance in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Giving people the right to vote makes no sense when the majority of the population disagrees with the concept of individual rights.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

Not necessarily

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 1:03PM EDT (link)

Robert Spencer opposed OIF early and often, if I’m remembering it right. I don’t know what Gellar and the other harpy believe about Sharia law, but I’ve never considered either to be in the same vein as Spencer.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

Aesthete---you are talking handfulls of people

JSobieski (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 1:09PM EDT (link)

and Spencer wasn’t even considered an conservative at the time precisely because of his opposition.

In the general political world, 99% of the criticism of Iraq war and Afghan war were from the left. 1% was grounded in a general Pat Buchanon isolation streak.

Even guys who should know better at this point (Newt, Santorum) realize the Sharia societies are abysmal but still seek political points on issues like Libya (a clear case of where regime change was a bad idea) or Egypt (an even clearer case).

I can understand a different policy in Syria (although I woudn’t agree), and I certainly would support it in Iran since I don’t see how anything worse could come out of it.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

That's certainly true

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 1:26PM EDT (link)

and quite unfortunate.

Personally, I think that our post-Gulf War Iraq policy was one of the most profoundly wrong-headed set of policies on the world stage that the US has supported in a long time: we set up a Sharia-compliant Shia state with significant Iranian influence on its politics and major parties, destabilized the region, and enabled some very, very bad regional actors to fill in the void where Saddam once stood (and quite shakily, at that). From the ’00s to today, the US has overseen the toppling of 3 secular dictatorships in the Middle East, and their replacement with even worse Islamist regimes. It appears to me that we’re set to do the same in Syria, and that we are also facilitating some very damaging “power-sharing” agreements in the PA, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

I concur, although I admit I was also dead wrong until about 2006

JSobieski (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 2:36PM EDT (link)

when using the language of the Matrix, I took the blue pill and saw a different explanation of what is real.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Every failed state?

renl57 Tuesday, February 28th at 5:05PM EDT (link)

al-Qaeda terrorists can operate in many failed states, where society is in chaos and the government is weak.

They’ve operated in Yemen.
They’ve operated in African states.

By your logic, the U.S. has to intervene to prop up any failed state anywhere on earth where terrorists could fish in troubled waters.

Good luck with that.

Is this place turning into the Ron Paul support forum?

Creedo Tuesday, February 28th at 6:09PM EDT (link)

No. You're just proving your ignorance.

acat (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:33PM EDT (link)

nt

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 
 

Newt is right

unsk Tuesday, February 28th at 6:57PM EDT (link)

What is our strategic objective in Afghanistan?

As far as I can see we have none. So what are we doing there? We will never be able to turn that stinking hole into a nation, so why waste the lives of our troops and our treasure to help Buraq Hussein save face?

We should pull out and bomb the crap out of the Paki’s and the Afghans. Those jihadis need to be taught a lesson big time. Obliterate the place.

 
 

you miss Erick's point entirely mikelindell2

AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 8:15PM EDT (link)

it’s the Irony here listening to Romney sycophants whining about a more conservative candidate use the system the establishment has set up to defeat conservatives for decades against said establishment.

Romney and his establishment lackey’s have for decades pushed for open primaries which has the effect of nominating moderate to liberal candidates in the Republican General elections and eliminates SoCons from the public discourse….now…along comes a SoCon turning their little game back on them and they is much whaling and gnashing of teeth!

The irony is going to be even thicker when Ron Paul walks away with Virginia because the establishment there tried to game the system there for their boy leaving the not-Romney voters no choice but to vote for a tin foil hat wearing fool in protest.

MarkTwain 3

Romney and "the establishment" haven't eliminated SoCons

mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 10:31PM EDT (link)

from the public discourse. They’ve done it all by themselves by supporting idiots and lightweights like Huckabee and Santorum. Huckabee was bad, but at least he’s entertaining, and he seems to have found his niche at Fox. Santorum is a complete and utter incompetent fool. The guy can’t open his mouth without embarrassing himself and anybody capable of rational thought.

Let me be clear, the problem isn’t specific individuals, the problem is the so called leadership of the movement. The jerkoff in Iowa who Santorum paid off and the whackos who showed up in your home state to “endorse” him. They are problem number one for the movement. Problem number two is that not enough of the rank & file know about or care about how politics really work. It’s a case of the ignorant following the fools.

Change

And the FiscalCon have nominated.... [crickets]

kipling (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 10:53PM EDT (link)

Or is Romney the new fiscal conservative champion?

Besides the obvious, your statement is bogus. Polling shows a split of social conservatives nationally. Social conservatives have not lined up in mass behind Santorum. Nor did they line up in mass behind Huckabee. You have a tendency to rewrite history to fulfill your vendetta against social conservatives. And, yes, I know you claim to be one.

Reading is fundamental kipling.

mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 11:02PM EDT (link)

I’m talking about the so called leadership, the people who get the press and make the noise. I specifically noted that I wasn’t talking about individuals, necessarily.

Santorum, as Huckabee, does well in caucus states where the results can be bought or rammed because of low overall turnout. They get their collective butts kicked in real elections.

I have no vendetta against so-cons, I happen to be one. I absolutely have a vendetta against big government religious people like the ones who anointed Santorum this time around. They aren’t conservative in the least. And yes, those folks lined up en mass behind both Huckabee and Santorum.

Change

Obviously logical argumentation is not fundamental for you.

kipling (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 11:12PM EDT (link)

Yes, you condemned the “so called leadership.”

Then you condemned the rank and file of social conservatives with this little gem: “Problem number two is that not enough of the rank & file know about or care about how politics really work. It’s a case of the ignorant following the fools.”

Polling clearly demonstrate that this is not the case. Polling also shows that the rank and file of social conservatives are not falling in line behind the leadership. You rail against something that only exists in your mind.

Among people for whom abortion and gay marriage are rated as very important issues

aesthete (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 11:41PM EDT (link)

Santorum and Huckabee were favorites. Social conservative subservience to the Bush admin’s domestic agenda was also problematic, in that enthusiastic support was not withheld based on unconservative actions (besides judges and McCain-Kennedy).

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

support for traditional marriage is a winning issue for us at the ballot box with 60% of Americans in support of it

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 9:30AM EDT (link)

It’s won every time it’s been on the ballot…with the exception most recently being Washington State….

It’s a dirty lie that Social Issues are losers for the Republican Party…it always has been…go down the line from abortion to gay marriage and support for the trtaditional family and you will see polls in the mid to high 60% support for Socon positions.

So what is your point aesthete?

MarkTwain 3

That is immaterial to my point

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 10:18AM EDT (link)

which is that some aspects of the social conservative movement (esp among leadership, but also among some in the rank and file) has been taking some very counterproductive stances wrt candidate selection and strategy — at least, if one is a full-spectrum conservative. In terms of candidate selection, they have yet to learn the difference between, say, a Rick Perry (who is very socially conservative without abandoning fiscal conservatism) and a Mike Huckabee or Rick Santorum. Perry was a viable option in Iowa — yet social conservatives flocked to Santorum in droves. Ditto for Thompson in ’08.

I’m not going to walk through why I think that the social conservative movement was asleep on the wheel during the Bush administration.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

 
 
 

I think what becker is railing against is valid in this case, kipling

lineholder (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 12:11AM EDT (link)

I probably wouldn’t have said that at the beginning of this primary, but I do think that way now. I’m a SoCon, so I know how tempting it can be to want to focus primarily and solely on social issues. But this is one case in particularly when we need to resist that temptation a bit more than we normally would, and make sure we present a solid balance between the fiscal and social issues.

I want those coming up behind us to have things in life that they can strive for, just like we did. Without those economic opportunities, what will their lives become? What will our nation become? Will they settle for basically becoming wards of the state to have any economic opportunity at all?

I just think that SoCons need to make sure we look at the whole picture, not just our own preferred sections of it.

I disagree, lineholder

kipling (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 12:28AM EDT (link)

I am a Social Conservative as well but, like you, I look at the big picture. I did not support Huckabee in 2008 because he lacked fiscal conservative credentials. In the current primary, I supported Rick Perry as he represented the who conservative spectrum – social, fiscal, and strong on defense. I think most social conservatives are like you and I. I think they look at the big picture. I do not think they blindly follow fools. – at least in no greater number than others.

What burns my biscuits are those who blame social conservatives for the lack of good candidates. Who was the better alternative in 2008 – McCain? Romney? I was pulling for Fred but he did not make the cut.

becker is too quick to blame social conservatives and to see imaginary armies of socons undermining the conservative position.

 

We ARE looking ast the whole picture linholder...Take this contraceptive mandate from HHS>..this isn't a loser for the Party...yet the bosses are running away from it

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 9:48AM EDT (link)

Thomas Jefferson who many say was not a Christian…but a Deist said the following:

I pledge upon the alter of Almighty GOD eternal hostility over all forms of tyranny over the minds of men.

and what is this mandate but tyranny over the mind of men…forcing those of us with religious conviction against killing the innocent and the unborn to pay for abortofacients and other forms of birth control.

I don’t follow the Catholic Church in their teaching on contraception, but I respect their right to teach, believe and live out their beliefs as their conscience dictates and any government mandate that restricts their rights to do so is an affront to free thinking people everywhere….and I know there is a vast majority of people in this country who think the same way

Voltaire said something along the lines of:

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it

This is an attitude that Millions of Americans hold on this issue and yet the cowards and the educated idiots at the head of the Republican party are having apoplectic fits and slinking away leaving a trail of pee on the floor behind them a running away from this issue and anything else that threatens people of conscience because they’re so afraid the NY Time might write something unflattering about them…Who will give us voice and satisfaction on this issue? Romney? Newt?

Only Rick Santorum is giving us voice and GOD bless him for it…if that makes you squeamish./..then so be it…but I think it’s past time for a lettile introspection from our libertarian bretheren on this issue…if you support Liberty…you simply must give voice to these concerns…and any candidate who is afraid to stand on this issue is a coaward and is undeserving of libertarian or SoCon support

MarkTwain 3

I've heard John Hoeven and several Republicans

aesthete (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 10:42AM EDT (link)

besides Rick Santorum (including Gingrich) address the issue cogently and as a religious liberty issue. In fact, the only one I’ve heard deviate from the obvious religious liberty angle is… Rick Santorum.

“It is a popular delusion that the government wastes vast amounts of money through inefficiency and sloth. Enormous effort and elaborate planning are required to waste this much money.”
-P.J. O’Rourke

I think it is his approach that bothers people, aesthete, more than the issue itself

lineholder (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 1:59PM EDT (link)

We live in a society where a massive amount of emphasis is placed on moral relativism. That doesn’t make it right, I know. And personally, I have no objections whatsoever to supporting more emphasis on moral absolutes.

But we do have to be realistic about the fact that because of the general mindset that exists in our society as a whole, approaching it SOLELY from the viewpoint of moral absolutes isn’t going to be well-received. Even if we are speaking the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, it still won’t be well-received.

There is actually a point where it could drive people away. That’s the part of it that concerns me most, I guess, because we do have more support on our side, from the position of liberty and freedom, than we might have thought.

 
 
 
 
 

No one has annointed Santorum...at least noone of eny stature or relevance...though many of us are backing him as the only viable alternative to Romney

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 9:25AM EDT (link)

As for this:

I absolutely have a vendetta against big government religious people

What’s the alternative? A big governmment anti-SoCon like Romney? Or a big government womanizing dog like Gingrich?

My only questin for you is this becker…for all your protestations that yiou are a conservative and a SoCon, why is it you alwase end up backing the establishment squish by default because you reject and demonize everyone else out of the box leaving the squish alone?

MarkTwain 3

I'll take the horndog, Ace.

acat (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 9:32AM EDT (link)

At least I know he’ll upend some troughs and butcher some sacred cows when he gets to D.C.

Santorum won Iowa, in part by buying Vander Pantaloons’ endorsement, in part by not being against ethanol, in part by living there for a year.

Santorum lost Michigan despite outreach to Libs and union thugs – the same union thugs that Red State and other Conservative organizations have been pushing back against.

Santorum’s worst enemy is himself – he cannot seem to hit a balance in his message… Part of that may be media skew, but .. as a candidate, it’s on *him* to change that, just as it was on Perry to change his post-early-debate image from “another empty-headed numb-nuts Texan” to something wittier… something Perry managed but Santorum … hasn’t.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

The insonsistancy here kills me...Santorum's big government sins are unfirgivable while Newt's and Romneys are not

AceInTX (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 9:57AM EDT (link)

how do you suare that round hole?

Newt is every bit as much a big government squish as Santorum…If anything a case can be made that he’s worse. Santurms NTU numbers show him to be far more fiscally conservative than you and the romney growd paint him to be…and despite his departures from Fiscon Orthodoxies, he never supported Cap and Trad, pumped out AGW propaganda or supported TARP and the auto bailouts like Newt and Romney did…

so what’s yourREAL objection to him acat?

MarkTwain 3

Selective vision will do that to you, Ace.

acat (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 10:25AM EDT (link)

Your insinuation that I must have some ulterior motive for disliking Santorum is all in your head, Ace. Please correct it.

Romney is not acceptable. He’s a lousy campaigner, and will govern as he has governed .. steering by his own course.

Santorum is not acceptable. He’s no better a campaigner, he’s got a muddy at best record on fiscal issues, and he doesn’t seem to realize his reliance on social conservative issues will not win in the general election. Further, your continued thumping of the NTU numbers completely *ignore* that they’re a selective and weighted rating, they don’t say anything other than what the NTU want them to say .. and I find them a lousy substitute for real analysis.

Paul is not acceptable. Spiders from Mars.

That leaves Gingrich… whose record is a mixed bag, but has the most conservative successes of the bunch.

Yes, Gingrich has AGW issues – but he was the only conservative I can recall trying to get capitalism-based reforms considered by the AGW acolytes. He failed, in part because AGW is a lie .. but nobody else even *tried*.

Yes, Gingrich has TARP issues – but again, TARP was sold one way and implemented another…. including the auto bailout… and those of us saying “Let them fail!” were pretty resoundingly shouted down .. even here on Red State.

In short, unless you’ve got some new data, you’re simply exercising your imagination.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

+55555555555...plus a bag of catnip :)

APA Guy (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 10:27AM EDT (link)
 

Ace, let me step in here to bridge a divide on which I respect both sides

JSobieski (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 10:29AM EDT (link)

although I come down as a Newt supporter, and I can understand and respect your support of Santorum.

Both of you are essentially making a decision of whom to support based on an assessment of who is a stronger candidate.

It isn’t about what sins are forgiveable or not, it is about who different people think can win and why.

Becker is convinced that Santorum is the weakest of the three candidates. You are convinced that Newt is the weakest of the three candidates. Both of you have reasons for those assessments. None of us have crytsal balls.

So long as we each agree to “rules” as outline below, this is just an argument about political strategy as much as anything else.

Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Romney is puke

redmymind (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 12:32AM EDT (link)

That's nice redmymind, real nice

Patrish Wednesday, February 29th at 12:45AM EDT (link)

Red, just keep dancing as fast as you can.

Pat T.

 
 
 

Desperate

bpgmswv1646 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:36PM EDT (link)

It says volumes about what Romney’s own internal polling must show…

Hoping!!

GOP Politix (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 7:04PM EDT (link)

From what I’ve seen in the past, Romney always does stupid things when he gets mad…

“What is truth?” – Pilate
John 18:38

 

Hoping!!

GOP Politix (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 7:10PM EDT (link)

From what I’ve seen in the past, Romney always does stupid things when he gets mad…in a few days we’ll see how this reckless tactic plays out

“What is truth?” – Pilate
John 18:38

 
 

Voter suppression by Romney? Lol

jamesm (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:41PM EDT (link)

So..Romney doesn’t want democrats to vote for a fellow Republican eh? He should have known the rules. The primaries and caucuses were set up to benefit a Romney candidacy and now he is whining? Pathetic

“Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character.” A. Einstein

Romney supporters wrote the rules

miconservative Tuesday, February 28th at 3:17PM EDT (link)

State House Speaker, Senate Majority Leader, vast majority of legislators and the Governor are all Romney backers and wrote the law that allows Dems to participate. They also voted for the early primary because they thought Romney would blow it out. Stinks when your plan falls apart because you can’t close the deal.

Nonsense

chadosborne Tuesday, February 28th at 5:03PM EDT (link)

The dems have always participated.

Bush lost there to McCain in 2000 because of the crossover vote.

Don’t worry about it. Romney will just declare victory among republicans and Santorum will be hailed as the UAW candidate in the race.

@ chadosborne: "Romney will just declare victory among republicans and Santorum will be hailed as the UAW candidate"

trickamsterdam Tuesday, February 28th at 7:43PM EDT (link)

The problem s w/ this logic, of course, is that:

1) Everyone knows that Romney is less popular w/Republicans than Santorum. His pos/neg rating w/ Republicans is more than thirty points lower (Santorum’s is something like 64/22). Therefore Democrats who support Santorum divide into two camps:

a) Reagan Democrats (precisely the type of voter we’re told Romney appeals to, which is of course, he doesn’t, to the point where the claim is sheer lunacy).

b) Very liberal Democrats like Kos and M. Moore. But then these are the people who supported Nader over Gore because “there is no difference between Gore and Bush” and then spent the next for years whining that Gore had been ripped off. They’re blowing themselves up now too. Not only is Santorum more electable, but Romney’s weakness may encourage someone else to get in the Race.

Speaking of which:

2) His own liberal Republicans are starting to turn against him. Both Chris Christie and Peter King (and others) have said that someone else may get in the Race, if Romney loses MI. King flat-out used the term “the Establishment”, BTW, and said “they” had “doubts” about Romney, and might “draft someone to enter the Race”. Thank you for your honesty, sir! Finally someone admits what we all know: There IS an Establishment, and up until know they’ve favored Romney.

And so, to wrap up:

3) A loss by Romney tonight means that Romney has been, to use a boxing term, “hurt”. It means he hasn’t been knocked out but he has been very obviously damaged. And w/ Newt and Santorum leading in some of the biggest States on Super Tuesday, I have to ask this only half-jokingly: Can we even guarantee Romney will win MA?

PS – Romney Delenda Est

 
 
 
 

55555 Erick

PatriotForLiberty Tuesday, February 28th at 1:44PM EDT (link)

Couldn’t agree more, Erick. And for those with short memories or too young to remember 2008, we were part of Operation Chaos:

“In late February 2008, Limbaugh announced “Operation Chaos,” a political call to action with the initial plan to have voters of the Republican Party temporarily cross over to vote in the Democratic primary and vote for Hillary Clinton, who at the time was in the midst of losing eleven straight primary contests to Barack Obama. Limbaugh has also cited the open primary process in the early primary states of New Hampshire and South Carolina, which allowed independent voters to cross over into the Republican primaries to choose John McCain over more conservative candidates (such as Fred Thompson), as an inspiration.”

Mittens is just hopeless and must be stopped.

 

Romney apologists

goodgovernance Tuesday, February 28th at 1:44PM EDT (link)

are transparent in their zeal to defend Mitt no matter what philosophical or logical inconsistencies they have to embrace. The more you get exposed to it, the more disgusted you get with the hardcore Romney supporters and Romney himself.

that is where I am

streiff (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:49PM EDT (link)

I’m seriously trying to decide which is worse, four more years of Obama or four more years of listening to Rombots.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

If Romney were to be the nominee

goodgovernance Tuesday, February 28th at 2:18PM EDT (link)

I have a strong suspicion Rombots would help doom Mitt’s chances in the general election. They’ll go way, way overboard in trying to push people into voting for Mitt, and turn the swing vote against him as a result.

We’d have to do a lot of work fixing the messes they cause, that’s for sure.

there is no reason the strategy they've pursued

streiff (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:29PM EDT (link)

in two GOP primaries will work any different in a general election.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 
 

I'm so mad at Romney

wantthegopback Tuesday, February 28th at 1:46PM EDT (link)

he has peeved me so much and shown himself to be so low. I am really wondering if I will be able to make myself vote for him. Everyday it seems to get harder.

I’m a punk. Email me at ryantboyd@me.com

 

Disagree

znjs (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:46PM EDT (link)

It absolutely makes sense to appeal to independents and get them to vote for you if there’s a reasonable chance they’ll also support you in the general election. But to actively go after not independent but Dem voters? That’s just sad. Michael Moore (one of the people helping push this) is not going to vote for Santorum in a general election. That’s the difference between what’s happening in MI and what happened in NH.

I suspect that Romney does not like having someone out dirty him, I applaud Santorum

center77 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:52PM EDT (link)

taking this tact with Romney. Mr. Flip flop was willing to burn the whole Party down, but when someone tries to burn him, now he is saying Santorum is dirty. This is nothing more than a built in excuse that will be used by team Romney. They will say they lost because of underhanded tactics. In truth, they are trying to fill the hole that is causing the ship to Sink.

My name is Timothy Bladel. I’m from Davenport, Iowa. I am a Undergraduate, Double Majoring in Journalism & Mass communication, with my other major being political science. I am conservative in nature, sometimes a tad bit libertarian; the Tenth Amendment is vital to changing this country for the better.

Mitt Romney 2012, but not without the truth of who he is.

www.timothy-bladel.com

“We the people” tell the government what to do, it doesn’t tell us. We the people are the driver, the government is the car. And we decide where it should go, and by what route, and how fast.” Ronald Reagan’s farewell address (January 11, 1989)

What exactly did Romney do that was so dirty

znjs (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:24PM EDT (link)

I get the complains about him being a flip-flopper – he is. But I don’t see anything he’s done in the campaign as being dirty, unless you think that being able to raise a lot of money and using it to win elections is dirty. I don’t – I think being able to raise money and get lots of SuperPac support is a sign of a strong candidate.

Meanwhile I’ll leave you with this Santorum quote from all of a month ago
“We want the activists of the party, the people who make up the backbone of the Republican Party to have a say in who our nominee is as opposed to a bunch of people who don’t even identify themselves as Republicans picking our nominee. I don’t like that.”

What exactly did Romney do that was so dirty? He went after Indies and Dem voters crossing over in NH

AceInTX (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 8:27PM EDT (link)

and other liberal states…there is no difference between Romney courting Dem crossovers in Northeastern states….

This pissing and moaning from the Romneybots is highly entertaining…you go Rick

Oh….someone pass the popcorn

MarkTwain 3

As I said

znjs (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 8:33PM EDT (link)

It’s one thing to appeal to people who might legitimately vote for you in a general election. You can argue whether they should be able to vote in our primary process or not, but a case can be made that appealing to those people to show you’re a strong general election candidate makes sense.

Santorum looks like he’s specifically going after people he knows won’t for vote him in a general election. He didn’t even mention independents in his robo-call – he went straight to Dem voters! Think about that. He’s pushing operation hilarity to win since he doesn’t have faith he can do it with actual Republican voters. And he’s doing this after saying in January

“”We want the activists of the party, the people who make up the backbone of the Republican Party to have a say in who our nominee is as opposed to a bunch of people who don’t even identify themselves as Republicans picking our nominee. I don’t like that.”

 
 
 
 
 

For those who protest this...

plwinteregg Tuesday, February 28th at 1:47PM EDT (link)

…they should remember that Santorum has been quoted a number of times defending his electability by claiming he can attract a Reaganesque coalition that includes the ‘Reagan Democrats’. It is, after all, how Santorum was able to win elections in blue-leaning PA.

So here you have the Romney (& his supporters) on one hand claiming he is more electable, yet screaming bloody murder when those very folks he claims to be able to attract are encouraged to vote for a Republican candidate. If the former is true, Romney should be excited about bringing in the blue-collar Reagan Democrats.

Perhaps Romney and his supporters are upset not so much because he may lose the MI primary, but because this is exposing the lie of his supposed electability.

If this works for Santorum, then he scores not only MI, but perhaps he also makes an effective argument to being able to peal Dems away from Obama.

Dems Voting for Rick Because they Want him as the nominee

mikelindell2 Tuesday, February 28th at 1:51PM EDT (link)

Michael Moore and the DailyKos are both encouraging Democrats to vote for Santorum. That’s not because they like him, it’s to give us a candidate who will cripple the party this year.

Gingrich is not complaining is he?

jamesm (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:55PM EDT (link)

nt

“Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character.” A. Einstein

 

Anectodal reporting...

plwinteregg Tuesday, February 28th at 2:05PM EDT (link)

…seems to indicate this element from the Dems will actually be pretty small and not what is at issue here. Santorum has been actively promoting the idea of rebuilding the Reagan coalition to include the conservative/blue-collar/etc Democrats. Whether you like him or not, you have to realize it’s what worked for him in PA to great effect and may at least be part of his reasoning here.

Having said that, what I find really amazing is how quickly the Romney camp is willing to unwittingly admit his lack of ability to attract that group of voters.

My Problem With Rick's Deeds Is

mikelindell2 Tuesday, February 28th at 2:18PM EDT (link)

that he’s not saying here are my policies and vote for me. His call sounds like something orchestrated by David Axelrod, bashing Romney for not supporting an auto bailout, the same auto bailout that Santorum opposed as well (the message conveniently leaves that out). Also, it’s a Republican primary and I really feel that only Republicans should be voting so that we get a conservative nominee. It’s a sad day for conservatives when liberal Romney will most likely win the Republican vote and Big Government Rick may only squeak out a win by pandering to, and being exploited by, Democrats.

And Romney ads

miconservative Tuesday, February 28th at 2:39PM EDT (link)

That say he is a conservative and Rick Santorum is the liberal are legitimate? I have been subjected to countless of those for weeks. One round of robo-calls is going to change the election?? I have gotten about 100 Romney robocalls.

The Santorum Democrats

Paula (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:08PM EDT (link)

The Santorum robocall was making the point that Romney had voted for the Wall St. bailout but not the auto bailout, implying that he had a double standard.

This is a message that would appeal to my parents – lifelong Dems and union members. They voted for Obama but are now shocked at what he has done to the economy. They’ve seen their 401K and the value of their condo completely tank in the last few years and they’re worried. They blame Bush and Wall Street (whoever that is). I don’t see them voting for Romney because of his ties to Wall Street. However, I think Santorum’s blue collar/manufacturing message may cause them to cross over.

Paula
My blog: Bold Colors
Follow me on Twitter: pbolyard

I agree

miconservative Tuesday, February 28th at 3:10PM EDT (link)

Santorum can get Reagan Democrats.

No Way

mikelindell2 Tuesday, February 28th at 3:29PM EDT (link)

The economy is off the table if Rick is our nominee. It will turn into an election about all of his strange statements on wanting to puke over the separation of church and state, how Christians are bad if they’ve used contraception, why college is for snobs, and how states have the right to ban contraception. It will be the best gift for Obama as it will shift the election into a referendum on Santorum’s fringe statements which Obama will be able to easily scare voters with.

and if we are concerned about *our* base being less energized this year

fightnright Tuesday, February 28th at 4:14PM EDT (link)

wait and see how months of ads simply carrying the one quote that the separation of church and state makes Santorum want to throw up energizes the LEFT base. You couldn’t try to design a campaign strategy to drive (D) voters to the polls more reliably, taking away any advantage Repubs have over dispirited Dems and ABO moderate/secular voters better than that.

I will cheerfully and energetically support Santorum, Newt or Mitt this November, but that statement makes any quote from Mitt about caring for the poor or driving Cadillacs look like genius. Rick should not be setting out bait in the primary that will turn to poison in the general.

“I think we ought to suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two years and just tell them we won’t hold it against them, whatever decisions they make, to just let them help this country recover,” she said. “I really hope that someone can agree with me on that. … You want people who don’t worry about the next election.” Beverly Perdue, NC Governor

If you don’t believe that Democrats will do what they say, then don’t vote. But be warned: your 2016 vote may come too late. Vote Republican in 2012!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Michael Moore and Kos are "Reagan Democrats"?

Marcus_Traianus (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:23PM EDT (link)

Who knew?

Somebody will have to school me on exactly how Santorum is specifically targeting “Reagan Democrats” to vote in Michigan. That would be opposed to your sundry liberal Democrats seeking to create havoc.

Oh and how is that relevant in a Republican Primary where the party is allegedly picking its candidate?

If Santorum want s to prove his message will bring everyone together in one big kumbaya moment, he should let that message carry him through the process ordained by the party he allegedly want to represent. Then try it in the general.

IMHO this is nothing more than a thinly veiled foil to advance Santorum past Michigan. Is that what this party has come to- Pyrrhic victory?

“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson

Kos and Moore think Santorum is weaker. I think they are wrong

Republican_Michigander (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:51PM EDT (link)

Kos and Moore aren’t union dems. They are rich leftist Berkeley types who think any social conservative is weak. Moore despite talking up Flint lives in rich Torch Lake or Manhattan depending what he feels like doing. Kos is in Berkeley. That’s a far cry from Clinton Township, Fraser, Trenton, or Flushing.

Romney’s backers WANTED the open primary in August to get independent voters. It’s backfiring on them. Too bad.

Less Government, More Freedom

http://republicanmichigander.blogspot.com

Kos and Moore won

thosjefferson Tuesday, February 28th at 3:18PM EDT (link)

in 2008 and they’re lining up to win again in 2012. Santorum’s a far worse GOP candidate than McCain/Palin, but even if Santorum somehow wins the nomination and election, Kos and Moore will have won because Santorum supports their causes: government favoritism for designated industries,support for Davis-Bacon, opposition to right-to-work, support for earmarks, support for higher government spending and debt, support for big government programs. Santorum’s Senate voting record is a liberal’s dream.

 

Problem with that argument is

Marcus_Traianus (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:56PM EDT (link)

…the people they are calling to arms aren’t “rich Berkley types”. They are hardcore Democrats that will vote Obama in November. That’s additive to this debate and our candidate in what way?

Santorum might be the anti-Romney and may also be the anti-Obama. But it’s what he stands for, not what he stands against that will matter come November.

There is no way whatever Santorum is selling will attract the “middle” come November. Nor does he have a message that will excite the base. His campaign antics, life-long career in politics and extemporaneous gaffes will have the opposite affect.

You would have thought by now ever member of the Republican Party would have figured out you need to appeal to the base first with a message that resonates to Independents. Not appeal to the lowest common denominator who will never vote Republican and take up their cause.

“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson

 
 

Pyrrhic victory

SteveM (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:12PM EDT (link)

We’re already there. Just read the comments on this site and over at Hot Air.

The GOP is now divided into armed camps shooting at one another. We should all be so proud, because we’ve put a huge smile on Barack Obama’s face.

Santorum folks hate Romney and his supporters.
Romney folks are starting to hate Santorum and his supporters.

Anybody got a plan to fix this come this summer? BTW. It doesn’t matter who started what. What matters is what happens now.

 
 

None of those folks are going to vote for Santorum.

SteveM (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:02PM EDT (link)

Come on. democrats crossing the line in November to vote for RS? Not going to happen.

 

These are not "Reagan/Santorum Democrats"

renl57 Tuesday, February 28th at 5:08PM EDT (link)

These are “tactical Democrats” who are voting for Santorum in the primary BUT who have no intention of voting for him in the general.

The goal is to stir up as much trouble in the GOP primaries as possible.

Someone else mentioned Rush’s own operation. Those were not moderate Republicans who might vote for Hillary in the general. Those were tactical Republicans who were just stirring up trouble in Dem primaries, after which they would vote GOP in the general.

 
 

Let's not forget,

vangoghssister (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:47PM EDT (link)

Romney’s also saying we shouldn’t attack OBAMA just to get an uptick in the polls.

What a hypocrite.

 

Santorum's after Reagan Democrats

Republican_Michigander (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:48PM EDT (link)

I was at Santorum’s speech yesterday. He’s after the Reagan Democrats. Generally blue collar social conservatives who are needed to win Michigan in a general election. What’s he’s attacking is Romney’s support for wall street bailouts while opposing the auto bailout. Santorum is against both bailouts.

The system was set up by state committee. A lot of the Romney backers wanted this system thinking that independents would support Romney who they wanted in the general. Most conservative republicans (including myself) wanted a caucus.

Less Government, More Freedom

http://republicanmichigander.blogspot.com

When McCain Did This I was Upset, but When Santorum does it.. I CHEER!???

quill67 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:05PM EDT (link)

Am I being inconsistent. No. This is how I see the difference:

McCain to Democrats:

I vote much like a Democrat, I believe many things that Democrats believe and if you nominate me, you will be assured that nothing much will chnage.

Santorum to Democrats:

I am very conservative. I believe that America and the things you care about will be better if I am elected President. We may not agree on everything but I can move the country in a positive direction.

McCain’s vision is of surrender. Santorums is one of: Come join us. We will make America better.

Do you think Gingrich voters will pull for Santorum to pick off Mitt?

snowshooze (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:20PM EDT (link)

I’d do it. and then after upsetting Mitt, go back to Newt ( Paul voters might think of this too ) for the General?
At this point the value of beating Mitt in his own living room should be pretty high.
And Mitt has money… but with him spending 20:1 he’s gonna run out… gosh, to think one guy could do so much for Michigan.
That means for every dollar Santorum spends… Mitt will blow 20…
I hope Santorum takes credit for bringing in all the Mittmoney.

 
 
 

This is shady.

kentucky Tuesday, February 28th at 1:50PM EDT (link)

Romney is toast if he loses Michigan, and now if he loses the knockout punch will have been delivered by… DEMOCRATS. They will have completely altered the trajectory of this race.

If Romney loses Michigan, now matter the margin, there needs to be a mass exodus of high-profile supporters from his campaign to pressure him into leaving the race so that a new candidate can be recruited who can use Romney’s ballot access as a proxy, while personally qualifying for access where possible. Otherwise, we’ve blown the entire election.

Surely, someone out there is electable, wants to be president, and is capable of being nominated???

If Dems are determinative that may be true

miconservative Tuesday, February 28th at 2:43PM EDT (link)

But they will not vote in big enough numbers to change the outcome. And if the small number that do turnout change the outcome than Romney has no one to blame but himself because he couldn’t close the deal.

His message in Michigan has been terrible. He has spent nearly $10 million on that crap message. He has the support of the GOP Gov., Lt. Gov., Attorney General and the vast majority of the GOP legislators and all of their operatives and he still can’t close the deal. He has the support of the local media and still can’t close the deal.

Romney is the one who made this race close and given the Democrats the opportunity, if it is an opportunity. He has nobody to blame but himself because he stinks as a candidate even with every possible conceivable advantage.

agreed. Romney is in trouble because he has run an abysmal campaign

red_oakster (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:30PM EDT (link)

He decided early on that he was going to position himself at the center this year, but he never protected his right flank. His tax proposals were very weak out of the gate, and even last week when he beefed them up a bit, he still defended progressivity in the tax code. I believe he’s a moderate, so the caution probably reflects his true feelings, but it left the field pretty wide open for others. If Pawlenty and Perry hadn’t proven so inept as candidates, Romney might have collapsed much earlier.

So if the Democrats help to bury Romney, don’t overlook the fact he gave them plenty of shovels.

Huh, and I thought it was all about the candidate with the most money

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:55PM EDT (link)

Who knew that Romney would turn out to be the Joe Biden of the Republicans. Obviously you can’t buy your way out of dumb statements. But hey, the trees are the right height in MI.

 
 
 

Use Romney's ballot access as a proxy?

Paula (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:12PM EDT (link)

What is that all about?

Paula
My blog: Bold Colors
Follow me on Twitter: pbolyard

 
 

Did you ever hear Romney complain about Ron Paul

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:52PM EDT (link)

who is likely getting a majority of the cross-over Democrat voters? Nope. Did Romney complain when an earlier SC poll came out that showed him getting more support in that state from Democrats than Republicans. Nope. Romney is really turning into one big crybaby when things don’t always go his way. What would he do when Kim Jong Un points a nuke at our bases in South Korea, just start crying and stamping his feet.

555

jamesm (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:57PM EDT (link)

n t

“Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character.” A. Einstein

 

Booo freaking hooo

miconservative Tuesday, February 28th at 3:12PM EDT (link)

If Romney can’t close the deal in Michigan it is his fault.

 
 

Funny

Marcus_Traianus (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 1:55PM EDT (link)

…I thought this was a Republican primary.

Given all the past prattle on this issue, talk of changing the primary process to better accommodate Republicans real choice, etc., etc., one would have thought this would be heresy.

Yet an alleged Republican candidate makes an appeal to union members. Michael Moore fans and other people who will vote for Obama in November and we should be distracted by select Romney “failings”?

The only thing I fail to see is the rational logic.

“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson

This whole post is a long example

znjs (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:10PM EDT (link)

of what Santorum fans always complain about Mitt supporters doing – can’t defend the candidate so just attack the other candidates. You’re absolutely right to point out how many people suddenly don’t care that Dems can vote in our primaries now that it helps Santorum.

 

anything that helps defeat Romney

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:09PM EDT (link)

Doesn’t matter if they would blow up if Romney was doing it to others. I think they would abandon all principles of fair play if it would help Ricky.Just imagining the outrage if Romney was being helped by the libs meddling in REPUBLICAN primaries.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

 
 

Romney has no room to cry, after all his lying attack ad carpet bombing

Common_Cents (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:00PM EDT (link)

If Romney can’t take the heat, he needs to get out of the race.

“Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government
that requires every citizen to prove
they are insured…. but not everyone
must prove they are a citizen.”
-Ben Stein

“In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.”[especially in DC] – Friedrich Nietzsche

 

So glad to hear you say this, Erick!

azaeroprof (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:01PM EDT (link)

Mitt’s entire “electability” meme is based on his ability to attract so-called Independents and moderate Democrats better than these “kooky conservatives”. If the Dems, for whatever reason, are out voting against him in the primary, it just exposes that rationale as the joke some of us have known it was from the beginning.

"for whatever reason"

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:12PM EDT (link)

heh, so even if the reason is complete opposite of being attracted to Rick due to the voters being moderate democrats, it’s still a fair attack on Romney?

These excuses are amusing as is the hate towards Romney.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

Not a Santorum fan, but Romney's a lying suckweasel

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:20PM EDT (link)

to borrow a term from another Redstate member who’s screen name eludes me at the moment. He has done more dirty campaigning than the rest of the group combined.

Payback’s a fother mucker.

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

you need to

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:25PM EDT (link)

diversify your vocabulary.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

Not to speak about Romney

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:28PM EDT (link)

or his brain dead supporters I don’t.

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

brain dead is as

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:45PM EDT (link)

brain dead does.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

Well aren't you the clever one.

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:56PM EDT (link)

And so original as well!

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

 
 
 
 
 

You can't blame Santorum

azaeroprof (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 7:51PM EDT (link)

for the “Michael Moore” idiots who think they’re doing mischief (look how well that worked out for us in ’08 vis-a-vis Operation Chaos). But there is nothing wrong with him appealing to Dem/Indie voters who may be sympathetic to his message.

 
 
 

Romney is a horse's ass

veritaseequitas Tuesday, February 28th at 2:04PM EDT (link)

better than Obama of course, but a horse’s ass nevertheless.

 

Ends justify the means?

sethellis Tuesday, February 28th at 2:11PM EDT (link)

Note that in his diary Erick doesn’t really defend Santorum’s tactics. He just complains about Romney. In other words, he hates Romney so much that he really doesn’t care how he is defeated.

This issue is being viewed in the wrong context. It doesn’t matter if what Rick is doing is principled or not. The question is what influence does this have on the party? What does it say about Republicans when Dems can hijack the primary in this way? The Republican party is being dismantled before our eyes, and all these people care about is using it for another opportunity to bring Romney down.

Oh good grief

Erick Erickson (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:27PM EDT (link)

The point is that the Romney camp has been mouthing off Democratic talking points for a year and the Romney supporters have largely embraced them or kept quiet. Now Santorum turns the tables on them and they scream foul.

Turn about is fair play.

Who will stand on either hand and keep this bridge with me?

Turnabout is fair play

sethellis Tuesday, February 28th at 3:12PM EDT (link)

You’re right. Turnabout is fair play. It might even prove to be effective. That doesn’t make it the right thing to do. Have you considered even for a second the larger implications here? What takeaway are we giving the american people when we help Democrats undermine our own primary? It puts the entire party into disarray, and makes us look like buffoons. How can we expect independents or even conservatives to put their trust in such an organization? How can we expect to change washington and fix the economy when we are so divided amongst ourselves that we enlist the help of our worst enemies for internal battles?

Not even Reagan can win with that party.

 

This is What Happens When 2 Front-runners are Highly Flawed

mikelindell2 Tuesday, February 28th at 3:36PM EDT (link)

I’m very unhappy with the current front-runners. EE, I know you’re hoping the Sweet Meteor of Death still hops into the race but I suggest you take a serious look at endorsing Newt. He is the only proven and accomplished small government conservative and he has put forth the most conservative proposals, including a flat tax. Big Government, Big Labor, Big Spending Rick is not a fiscal conservative and would damage the party terribly. He’s fighting strange social issues in this campaign, not things like abortion which I would well understand, but things like college and contraception. Liberal Mitt is no better and is also gaffe-prone. Either record does not give one confidence. Newt’s record does, his plans do, and his ability to frame each argument in a way that gives Republicans the upper hand does.

 
 

What ends? Romney trying to buy an election?

jamesm (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:27PM EDT (link)

Romney has the establishment backing in Michigan. The same establishment that set up the rules.

“Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents and harmless as doves” (Matthew 10:16, KJV).

“Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character.” A. Einstein

Yes, glad to see Santorum is being strategic.

littlehouse18 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:45PM EDT (link)

And looking to show he can attract a broader vote.

Until now Romney thought he could benefit from open primaries.

I wasn’t sure about Rick’s move at first, but it is vitally important for his momentum to do very well in MI. If Romney wins both states today the media will crown him as having finally vanquished the rest of the field.

 
 

How about Rick Snyder in Michigan -- Romney endorser

miconservative Tuesday, February 28th at 2:29PM EDT (link)

Rick Snyder campaign appeals to independents, Democrats to vote for him in GOP primary

Published: Monday, July 19, 2010, 2:46 PM Updated: Monday, July 19, 2010, 4:16 PM

By Jeff Cranson | The Grand Rapids Press MLive.com
The Rick Snyder for Governor campaign today appealed directly to independents and Democrats to vote in the GOP primary Aug. 3, laying bare what has been a quiet strategy from the beginning.

 

Erick's an agent

thosjefferson Tuesday, February 28th at 3:13PM EDT (link)

of equalize-now, which is intent on preventing Romney’s nomination.

http://www.equalize-now.org/nytimes/

So of course, to Erick, the ends justify the means.

Go Rick McGovern!

Well I heard EE pilots one of those black helicopters

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:22PM EDT (link)

and was hired to fly the plane with the anti-Romney banner over NASCAR. Do you igiots ever give up?

That's Stoneage. This is the REAL Truth

Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:26PM EDT (link)

Mr. Obama is pretending that an economic “recovery” is underway when he knows damn well that the banking system is just blowing smoke up the shredded *** of what’s left of that economy – James Howard Kunstler

RMJ- Thanks

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:41PM EDT (link)

but I cannot watch videos. Obama has banned all high speed internet access in rural conservative areas. LOL Seriously, I have no high speed access unless I use a dish service such as Hughes Net which I tried for a while. The speed was only slightly faster than my dial up, and it cost $70 a month, as opposed to $10 for dial up. In addition, every time there was a storm I had no internet access at all. That’s a price you pay for country living, but hey, I bet many don’t look out their window at a 10 acre field with horses grazing in it.

It Was Geekophelia

Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:59PM EDT (link)

-nt

Mr. Obama is pretending that an economic “recovery” is underway when he knows damn well that the banking system is just blowing smoke up the shredded *** of what’s left of that economy – James Howard Kunstler

Oh OK RMJ

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:15PM EDT (link)

I kinda thought maybe the ghost was calling EE James Bond, Agent 007, or some such.

Just a Smith....

Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:17PM EDT (link)

AGENT SMITH!

Mr. Obama is pretending that an economic “recovery” is underway when he knows damn well that the banking system is just blowing smoke up the shredded *** of what’s left of that economy – James Howard Kunstler

 
 
 
 
 

then explain why

thosjefferson Tuesday, February 28th at 3:27PM EDT (link)

RedState more and more resembles DailyKos. Erick’s anti-Romney articles here are parallel to the anti-Romney articles there. Apart from the Obama campaign itself, who is more anti-Romney than RedState and the DailyKos?

Pretty much everyone

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:29PM EDT (link)

with genuine conservative principles and values.

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

 

Just me

Erick Erickson (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:30PM EDT (link)

“who is more anti-Romney than RedState and the DailyKos?”

We’ve actually had front page writers endorse Romney here. And guess what? They still write here, unlike you.

But who is more anti-Romney, me or Kos? Me, of course. Because Kos and I both know Obama will beat him like a tin drum. I am doing my best to prevent that from happening.

Who will stand on either hand and keep this bridge with me?

 

Then don't read or post here, it's that simple

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:32PM EDT (link)

I’m quite certain that there are plenty of pro-Romney sites that you will feel all warm and fuzzy at. Take your blankie with you.

This is private property, with the rights to post as they choose, and with the right to ban those they choose to. You don’t seem to get that.

 
 
 

Actually, the name I prefer is...

Bill S (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:01PM EDT (link)

Mitt McDole.

But you can laugh at a distance while we all laugh at the fact that you no longer have the ability to post here. Big freakin’ loss.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

 
 
 

Romney Endorser and MI GOP Gov Rick Snyder

miconservative Tuesday, February 28th at 2:27PM EDT (link)

did the same thing in his primary campaign. Wonder if Romney thought that was a dirty trick as well.

http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2010/07/rick_snyder_campaign_appeals_t.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/michigan-primary-democratic-mischief/2012/02/15/gIQA2zQuHR_blog.html

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/08/04/bernero_snyder_to_face_off_in_michigan_106607.html

Tax/fee increasers have to stay together

Republican_Michigander (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:55PM EDT (link)

Two peas in a pod. I didn’t vote for either one of them.

Less Government, More Freedom

http://republicanmichigander.blogspot.com

 
 

It's still stupid of Santorum

rebelandsaint Tuesday, February 28th at 2:28PM EDT (link)

It’s still stupid for Santorum to do that because it will de-legitimize his win if he does win. He was already going to get a huge margin from the Democrats. Now it means that if he wins Michigan, the headline will undoubtedly include this charge from the Romney camp. It was dumb. He negates any bounce he might have received from winning. He must think that it is more important for Romney to lose Michigan than for him to win.

if he wins he gets the delegates

streiff (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:30PM EDT (link)

that is all that counts. No one is claiming Romney’s NH is illegitimate.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 

Of course Mitt is outraged

Professor de la Paz (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:31PM EDT (link)

As a candidate, you’re always outraged by what your opponents are doing, even if it isn’t anything particularly despicable. Asking a candidate to stop being phony is like asking a cow to stop being tasty, it’s just in their nature.

Mittens is just mad because Ricky thought of it first.

snowshooze (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:00PM EDT (link)

As if ANYONE would turn down a vote at this point…
And in the General, they will want every vote they can dig up.

 
 

Romney complaining about this makes me laugh

miconservative Tuesday, February 28th at 2:35PM EDT (link)

The primary bill was written by the state legislature, led by Romney endorsers House Speaker Jase Bolger and Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville, and signed into law by Romney endorser Governor Rick Snyder. The Romney team wrote the rules that allow Dems to vote in the GOP primary because that is when Romney was trying to be the moderate and the one that could attract Dem votes.

Cry me a river. Michigan is home to the Reagan Democrats who crossed over to support Reagan in the Primary and again in the General. Santorum is attracting blue collar Reagan Democrats who are social conservatives, pro-second amendment, pro-jobs and pro-defense. What they don’t like is Romney and if we have a chance in Michigan at all this fall we need these voters.

Are some members Romney's team hypocrites?

jamesm (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:47PM EDT (link)

They need to disassociate themselves from his comments,

“Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character.” A. Einstein

 
 

You would think Democrats would vote for Mitt over Santorum

codenametimna Tuesday, February 28th at 2:37PM EDT (link)

From another thread mikelindell2 said: “Santorum is after all pleading with Democrats to vote for him in MI by making robocalls to bash Romney for not supporting the auto bailouts.”

Highly unlikely, since Rick Santorum didn’t support the auto bailouts either.

All that aside, the majority of Republicans don’t support Mitt Romney according to the polls. If Newt Gingrich dropped out of the race (which would be the noble thing to do since Newt has plummeted in the polls) that would be a big boost for Rick Santorum (who would gain the majority of Gingrich’s support no doubt) plus Santorum is already polling the highest against Mittens in the national polls. The majority of conservative votes are split between Santorum and Gingrich and if Newt dropped out of the race, Santorum would likely surge in the polls, and the liberal turned moderate, turned so-called conservative Mitt Romney, would probably lag far behind and lose the nomination just like he did in 2007 when he failed to convince the American people his shark jumping from liberal to so-called conservative was for real. Which the majority of Republicans and Independents are still having a hard time believing again in 2012 needless to say. It’s no wonder Mittens has had a hard time drawing in support from conservatives (which make up a majority in the Republican Party by the way). When recent comments of his saying: “I won’t set my hair on fire to win conservative votes” – shows a man visibly upset with the conservative Republican Party base. The same Republican Party base, which is made up of a majority of conservative Americans who love freedom, liberty, low taxes and limited government. Whereas, Mitt Romney seems determined to distance himself from the very people who could solidify a win for him for the Republican nomination. Yet Romney seems unwilling to do what is necessary to garner those conservative voters. No, I don’t mean by setting his hair on fire either.

I mean by “warming up” to conservatives by gladly attending Tea Party events (which he has distanced himself from, because he’s not really a conservative like he says he is maybe??). Just sayin’. He also needs to “convince” conservatives that his speeches aren’t just all talk. For what it’s worth, Mitt Romney has had a hard time convincing himself of his own conservative talking points. If he can’t really convince himself he’s a conservative, how is he going to convince real conservative Americans – who are the majority voting block in the United States of America – to vote for him? In other words, those who walk the conservative walk, not just talk a conservative talk like Mitt Romney is perceived as doing in my opinion.

Romney lost the nomination in 2007 because… wait for it… he couldn’t convince Republicans he was who he said he was. He said he was a conservative but a person only needed to look at his previous record in politics, and his own life, to know that that simply wasn’t true. A person can say anything he wants to, but that doesn’t necessarily make it true, right? What the American people have to go by is a person’s own record on social and other issues over the span of a person’s lifetime. The sixty four thousand dollar question on everyone’s mind is: what suddenly made Mitt Romney “flip-flop” and become a so-called conservative? Was it because of a personal conviction that his previous positions on the issues were flat out wrong and his remorse led him to repentance because he finally “saw the light”? Or was it because he had his “eye on the presidency” and knew in today’s world the only way he could get the Republican nomination – is if he ‘morphed’ into a conservative – to be able to tap into that vast reserve of conservative voters (which make up the majority of the Republican Party by the way) in order to obtain the prize of winning the coveted Republican nomination that he’s really really wanted since at least… 2007? Since he seems unwilling to “convince” the American people (or himself) that his “conversion” to conservatism was for real, why then would the vast majority of conservatives want to vote for Mitt Romney? Since Mittens hasn’t yet convinced the majority of conservatives to support him, it’s no doubt the main reason why he “can’t get over the hump” or “break out” and pull away from the rest of the field.

Rick Santorum is also having a more difficult time convincing Republicans he’s a true social conservative (his support of the abortion mill Planned Parenthood is one reason no doubt) but he is also having trouble convincing the American people he’s a true “fiscal” conservative after the spotlight has been placed upon him by the media. Which have put “chinks in his armor” of his claim he’s a fiscal conservative. The “Bridge to Nowhere” (supporting it even when funding for hurricane Katrina was threatened) is just one example of “fiscal” recklessness by Rick Santorum. He still hasn’t admitted his mistake over the “Bridge to Nowhere” fiasco. If he did admit the mistake I missed it then.

Hey, I call them like I see ‘em! We the American people need to hold our politicians, and in this case our four Republican presidential candidates, accountable. If they can’t pass muster, then BROKERED CONVENTION here we come!

A Dark Horse candidate that is unstained, above reproach, and a true conservative, might be just what the doctor ordered. But who that theoretical Dark Horse candidate will turn out to be (if there really is a brokered convention) is anyone’s guess. Jeb Bush recently shot himself in the foot when he said: “I used to be a conservative.” Mitch Daniels seems too scared to take the plunge. Marco Rubio?? Rand Paul??? Jim DeMint???? Time will tell I reckon.

If Mitt Romney could just convince the very same people he apparently despises – to vote for him – this could be over in no time. If Rick Santorum could convince people he’s really a fiscal conservative – this could be over in no time. So far Romney and Rick Santorum, and for that matter Newt Gingrich, haven’t convinced the majority of Republicans yet.

Super Tuesday should give all of us a better idea of who will end up winning the nomination. Or whether the likelihood of a brokered convention will happen instead. Time will tell.

I'm going to be less wordy and say

conservativemountaineer Tuesday, February 28th at 3:32PM EDT (link)

5^infinity.

Well said.

Just because the cloud has a silver lining doesn’t mean it’s not going to rain.

 
 

Will I be glad when this stupid election is over

Kyle-MI (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 2:56PM EDT (link)

Both the primary and the general.

I will be upfront. I voted for Romney today, but I only slightly favor him over Santorum or Gingrich. I have no problem voting for any of these three in the general election. Of course, that is a very low hurdle to jump. At this point, I am so disgusted with Obama’s policies that I would vote for a ham sandwich over Obama. (Not that I believe everyone would vote such way.)

Santorum has policies I could get behind and promote. I am even OK with some of his supporters, mostly those who have been for him since the beginning. However, the big anti-Rombots have been particularly obnoxious jerks as of late and that includes Erick.

We're trying to give

Erick Erickson (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:31PM EDT (link)

as good as we get.

Who will stand on either hand and keep this bridge with me?

There are jerks on both sides

Kyle-MI (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 8:49PM EDT (link)

Although Romney does not have a head jerk running this website.

Seriously, I think everyone is stressed out by the need to defeat Obama and yet being hamstrung by this lack-luster field. We know one of these guys will be the nominee and we will have to support them with all of their warts. We end up taking it out on each other.

 
 

So basically you voted for Mittens out of spite?

texasref (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:38PM EDT (link)

Another example of the kind of attitude we Not Romney folks are up against.

“The medical director who performed the autopsy on Trayvon Martin found only two injuries on his body: the gunshot wound and broken skin on his knuckles. Welcome to the Duke lacrosse case all over again.”–Rush Limbaugh, 5-16-12

Next Step: Docket Sounding on 8-8-12
Final Step: Verdict of Not Guilty

You just don't get it, do you?

Kyle-MI (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 8:44PM EDT (link)

I have been leaning toward Romney for a while for a bunch of other reasons besides sticking it to the man (that would be you people). It is hard not to take it personally when the person you support is personally attacked.

I will admit that there are parts of me – places in me I would rather not visit – that would take some joy in seeing Romney crush Santorum in Michigan just to see some of the anti-Romneybots freak in horror. (Not that it is likely from the polls.)

On the other hand, I am not going to crumble into a fetal position should Santorum win, whimpering “the end of the GOP, the end of the GOP, the end of the GOP ….” While I think Romney is the least bad of our terrible choices, I am OK with Santorum or Newt.

 
 

thanks for the vote

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:43PM EDT (link)

Hope Romney wins both states tonight, then gets good momentum for March and we’re done. That will finally stop all the dirt being poured on him from the Right and we can focus on defeating Obama instead of fighting each other.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

You're not the only one who thinks the right will rally to Romney if he's the nominee.

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 3:58PM EDT (link)

Romney thinks so too. You’re both headed for some serious disappointment.

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

lol serious truth, Vegas Rick, 5

texasref (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 11:31PM EDT (link)

preach on

I’m not going to like it when Santorum gets the nomination, but I’ll at least be glad it wasn’t Romney.

If Romney gets the nomination, I think my time at redstate will be over.

“The medical director who performed the autopsy on Trayvon Martin found only two injuries on his body: the gunshot wound and broken skin on his knuckles. Welcome to the Duke lacrosse case all over again.”–Rush Limbaugh, 5-16-12

Next Step: Docket Sounding on 8-8-12
Final Step: Verdict of Not Guilty

kowalski

texasref (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 11:32PM EDT (link)

What I mean by that is, I’ll be so politically depressed that I won’t want to participate and will go into deep hibernation until 2015 (unless Romney wins the presidency, in which case it will be about 2019).

“The medical director who performed the autopsy on Trayvon Martin found only two injuries on his body: the gunshot wound and broken skin on his knuckles. Welcome to the Duke lacrosse case all over again.”–Rush Limbaugh, 5-16-12

Next Step: Docket Sounding on 8-8-12
Final Step: Verdict of Not Guilty

 
 
 
 
 

Romney voted for Tsongas (D)

kaheo Tuesday, February 28th at 3:45PM EDT (link)

Because he thought that that Tsongas was going to be a weak candidate in the general and Clinton had to be stopped. What he also didn’t tell folks was that Tsongas was a good friend of his!

Say we assume Romney was voting against his friend purely as a dirty tactic to spoil for the Dems, why is it wrong now when the Dems do the same!

 

555555 Erick

deano64 (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:05PM EDT (link)

Spare me the outrage as well.

Precinct Committeeman before it was cool.

“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”
Alexis De Tocqueville

 

What if Romney had done this?

danielsfpc Tuesday, February 28th at 4:09PM EDT (link)

I can’t help but wonder what Erick would have posted if Romney had done this and not Santorum.

I'd bet on a lot of outrage

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:12PM EDT (link)

with liberal Romney trying to screw up the REPUBLICAN primary and the REPUBLICAN choice.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

It appears there's plenty of outrage to go around,

danielsfpc Tuesday, February 28th at 4:36PM EDT (link)

but calling Romney a liberal is like calling Obama a conservative. Romney’s positions are essentially the same as Santorum’s. As for screwing up the primany, Republican voters make the decision. And thankfully many, if not most, are choosing Romney as the best man for the job.

I am not calling Romney liberal

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:41PM EDT (link)

as I certainly don’t believe that, but that would be what many here would say :) I know that the plurality of republicans so far are choosing Romney. As I am.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

 

I'll gladly call Romney a liberal

texasref (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 11:35PM EDT (link)

if only I could pin him down. Depends on what election we’re in. I tend to believe what he said the first time around about being prochoice and I look at his judicial nominations in Mass and I look at how his Romneycare was the prototype for Obamacare.

“The medical director who performed the autopsy on Trayvon Martin found only two injuries on his body: the gunshot wound and broken skin on his knuckles. Welcome to the Duke lacrosse case all over again.”–Rush Limbaugh, 5-16-12

Next Step: Docket Sounding on 8-8-12
Final Step: Verdict of Not Guilty

 
 
 
 

these aren't reagan democrats santorum is going after...

jon11 Tuesday, February 28th at 4:10PM EDT (link)

these are UAW gimps.

they wouldn’t vote for santorum in the general if you put a gun to their head.

they will vote for him now because they know he doesn’t have chance in the general.

Romney appealing to moderate republicans and independents is not comparable to calling UAW thugs to try to persuade them to pick the weaker GOP candidate…there isn’t anything remotely comparable.

And EE has the gall to knock Jennifer Rubin for shilling when he shills for anybody but.

Listen Erick, i don’t know if you’ve noticed or not, but its not jennifer Rubin who is singing off Markos Moulistsas and the UAW’s hymn sheet.

Its you and rush and bill kristol.

And you aren’t even for santorum. You’re just for anybody but romney.

lets see how far that gets us in november

Not every UAW member is democrat

Republican_Michigander (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:17PM EDT (link)

As someone from a UAW family, I can tell you that not all UAW members vote with Solidarity Magazine.

There’s a large number of union members, especially skilled trades, who are independents.

Now if this was aimed at government unions like SEIU or MEA, I’d be more inclined to agree.

Less Government, More Freedom

http://republicanmichigander.blogspot.com

 

I thought Erick had posted something about Santorum being a bad choice, so

earlgrey (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:25PM EDT (link)

should we just forget about the Pres. race and focus on Senate and Congress, because everytime I see a post from Erick on the Presidential candidates he is bashing them.

Erick isnt bashing Governor Perry's preferred candidate

texasref (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:49PM EDT (link)

But if you’re a Mitt supporter, yes by all means, forget about the Pres race.

“The medical director who performed the autopsy on Trayvon Martin found only two injuries on his body: the gunshot wound and broken skin on his knuckles. Welcome to the Duke lacrosse case all over again.”–Rush Limbaugh, 5-16-12

Next Step: Docket Sounding on 8-8-12
Final Step: Verdict of Not Guilty

 

Erick angling for Jeb?

Creedo Tuesday, February 28th at 6:20PM EDT (link)

Ever since the SMOD post, I’ve got the distinct impression from my reading of Erick’s posts that he’s angling for Jeb Bush to enter the race, and is thus interested in keeping things chaotic. Just my take. I don’t blame the guy for having whatever intentions he has. I just have a hard time believing that he’s got any interest in seeing this field settle into any one candidate, and is interested in pushing for the longshot of longshots to happen.

 
 

Listen, ***JON***

texasref (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:50PM EDT (link)

Being for ABR will get us a lot farther in November than that gimpy ol’ mare Mitt EVER will.

“The medical director who performed the autopsy on Trayvon Martin found only two injuries on his body: the gunshot wound and broken skin on his knuckles. Welcome to the Duke lacrosse case all over again.”–Rush Limbaugh, 5-16-12

Next Step: Docket Sounding on 8-8-12
Final Step: Verdict of Not Guilty

 

Who was Romney appealing to when he

Melody Warbington (rwm52) (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:03PM EDT (link)

mentioned how many Cadillacs he owns? That’s right. The UAW.

The woman saith unto him, I know that Messiah cometh (he that is called Christ): when he is come, he will declare unto us all things. (John 4:25)

 
 

Romney just laughed off the idea of a brokered convention

westcoastpatriette (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:16PM EDT (link)

on the Cavuto show. Insisted that there is no way the four of them left in the race would allow such a thing after all of the work they have all put into the race.

Guess he doesn’t understand that if no one gets the required amount of votes it will go to a convention whether the four of them like it or not. Thought that was a strange thing for him to say.

Praise ye the Lord. Sing unto the Lord a new song, and his praise in the congregation of saints. Let Israel rejoice in him that made him: Let the children of Zion be joyful in their King. Let them praise His name in the dance: let them sing praises unto Him with the timbrel and harp. Psalm 149:1-3

Nope..

chadosborne Tuesday, February 28th at 4:57PM EDT (link)

He’s saying that the four of them would cut a deal long before the nomination got to the floor of the convention.

An outsider can only step in if there’s no deal.

And just what kind of deal would that be?

westcoastpatriette (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:07PM EDT (link)

Does Romney think he will be able to buy off Paul’s delegates? Or Santorum’s or Gingrich’s? Somehow, I don’t see that happening.

Praise ye the Lord. Sing unto the Lord a new song, and his praise in the congregation of saints. Let Israel rejoice in him that made him: Let the children of Zion be joyful in their King. Let them praise His name in the dance: let them sing praises unto Him with the timbrel and harp. Psalm 149:1-3

 
 
 

Mitt just on Hannity...and it’s all about delegates.

Samsara (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:17PM EDT (link)

Translation:

I have lost in my “home” state, a contest that I have said was important, and a state that I predicted I would win….but now it’s all about delegates.

By the way, could you assist me while I douse my hair in lighter fluid?

Last night I heard on CNN

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:30PM EDT (link)

I believe it was John King that showed the MI map and circled the areas that Romney may do well in, and the areas that Santorum may win in. He pointed out that Santorum can lose the popular vote, but gain more delegates because of the population numbers in the likely Santorum areas.

A few more hours and the Romster will likely be standing on the stage patting himself on the back, even if he loses, just as he did in SC. He doesn’t need to set his hair on fire, he has already strapped a suicide helmet to his head, rhetorically speaking of course.

 
 

I'd rather have my candidate seek Democrat support rather than align himself with Ron Paul.

SoFiMil (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 4:38PM EDT (link)

What’s Miit’s problem?

www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com

 

Time to officially rename RedState and HotAir

SteveM (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:05PM EDT (link)

To “SantorumState” and “RickAir”, respectively.

This is probably the most tiring line of the 2012 primary.

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:08PM EDT (link)

At least show your disdain for our site in an original fashion.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


Disdain?

SteveM (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:13PM EDT (link)

I happen to like this site. When it’s not calling any and everybody who happens to like Mitt Romney names. What’s the point of that?

Yes, what is the point of name calling?

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:18PM EDT (link)

Physician heal thyself.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


Indeed

SteveM (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:20PM EDT (link)
 
 
 

Yawn.

Bill S (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:40PM EDT (link)

We’ve been accused of shilling for everyone except Ron Paul. As Aaron said, try something original. If this is the best you can do for a comment, maybe nick.com is better for you.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins

Nah.

SteveM (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 5:46PM EDT (link)

I’ll just amuse myself by reading about Romneybots for the 4 millionth time.

 

Make 'em do it in haiku.

NightTwister (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:44PM EDT (link)

RedState shills for Santorum
Flavor of the week
Latest not Romney

“Baseball fits America well because it expresses our longing for the rule of law while licensing our resentment of law givers.” ― Major League Commissioner of Baseball A. Bartlett Giamatti

 
 
 

early exits in MI

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:06PM EDT (link)

Romney winning GOP and Indies, Santorum up big with Dems. But Dems are just 10% of the voters.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

 

Read this robo-call script -- then tell me how you feel

concrusade Tuesday, February 28th at 6:19PM EDT (link)

“Attention all Democrats: Gov. Rick Snyder just endorsed Mitt Romney, the same Mitt Romney who said [Romney: ‘let Detroit go bankrupt.’] Mitt Romney doesn’t care about Michigan. This Tuesday is our chance to send Romney and Gov. Snyder a message. So please, go vote on Tuesday for Rick Santorum in the Republican primary. Now voting for Rick Santorum on Tuesday does not mean you’re becoming a Republican. You’ll still be able to vote in the Michigan Democratic Party caucuses and to reelect President Obama in November. This is our chance to send a message to Gov. Rick Snyder and his buddy Mitt Romney, who wants to [Romney: ‘let Detriot go bankrupt.’] Remember: a vote for Rick Santorum is a vote to embarrass Gov. Rick Snyder and Mitt Romney. Vote Santorum on Tuesday.”

Telling voters they will still be able to vote and reelect Obama in November sure doesn’t sound like Rick is going after Indies and Reagan Dems, huh?

Sad that we can’t disassociate the candidates from the actions and recognize this for what it is — pathetic.

I would have done that a bit different...

snowshooze (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:23PM EDT (link)

I would have said..
You Democrats will still be Democrats without a Democrat to vote for, so in order to help us defeat this socialist we need you to join our ranks and help save the Nation…

 

What's the source on this?

SteveM (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:29PM EDT (link)

Was this a call to you personally or did you read this somewhere?

Santorum's Freedom Defense Fund PAC

concrusade Tuesday, February 28th at 6:35PM EDT (link)

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/02/republican-pacs-robocall-also-tells-mi-dems-to-vote-santorum-to-spite-romney.php

Thanks

SteveM (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:45PM EDT (link)

..for including the link.

 
 
 

Romney's people created the rules

Republican_Michigander (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:36PM EDT (link)

Last August, there was a big debate over how Michigan was going to conduct its election. There’s a primary, convention, and caucus. Mitt’s people wanted the primary because they thought it was best for Mitt. Mitt got his wish.

Is this a dirty trick IF that’s true? Yeah. So was 15 robocalls in four days telling me how bad Santorum is. So are lies from some quarters saying that Santorum voted for a pro-abortion bill he voted against TWICE in the house after I checked the source – Thomas.loc.gov .

Romney’s camp is known for scorched earth and it’s getting a taste of it and his camp doesn’t like it. Oh well.

Less Government, More Freedom

http://republicanmichigander.blogspot.com

 
 

so much for this idiocy being peddled that santorum is appealing to reagan dems...

jon11 Tuesday, February 28th at 6:36PM EDT (link)

cnn just interviewed first dem who voted for santorum.

asked how it made him feel he said ‘i needed to go home and take shower,’ but he added that ‘strategically’ it was the right thing to do.

you can spin working hand in hand with moulitsas any way you want…doesn’t make it right.

id love erick to share the esoteric data that makes him think one of the not-romneys has a better chance in the general. I say esoteric because all the data available to public clearly shows romney is the guy with the best shot.

and don’t come back with some moronic 2 day old poll. Romney’s been at or ahead of osama for 4 months. Santorum for 2 weeks.

So none of that BS. Lets look at the big picture.

How is he electable?

Republican_Michigander (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:41PM EDT (link)

I say esoteric because all the data available to public clearly shows romney is the guy with the best shot.

What data? Besides general election polls which are nearly worthless until after labor day? McCain lead in the polls once, too.

Less Government, More Freedom

http://republicanmichigander.blogspot.com

And yet when other polls...

renl57 Tuesday, February 28th at 6:56PM EDT (link)

…seem to show Santorum doing reasonably well against Obama today, perhaps as well as Romney today, Santorum’s supporters have no qualms about gleefully touting those polls.

 
 
 

More on Dem dirty tricks

renl57 Tuesday, February 28th at 6:54PM EDT (link)

A longtime liberal radio host asking Democratic listeners to vote for Rick Santorum in Michigan’s Republican primary told CNN Tuesday he loves making mischief. After spending nearly all of his three hour program encouraging Democrats to get out and vote for Santorum Tuesday, Tony Trupiano makes no apologies for his mischief. “Because Rick Santorum is doing as well as he is doing here in the polls, we could actually take some serious delegates away from him [Mitt Romney],” Trupiano said….

It turns out many Democrats in this state don’t need a lot of convincing to engage in this kind of strategic voting.

At a polling station in Dearborn Heights, Crystal Larson said her vote for Santorum made her “feel like I made a deal with the devil.”

“Voting for Santorum goes against everything I believe in and everything I’ve ever stood for in my life and to vote for him takes a lot of guts I think,” Larson said.

She said she hadn’t received any of the robo calls, but heard about the Democratic effort in the media and decided to vote for Santorum at the last minute.

Gary Zulinski, also voting in Dearborn Heights, said, “I was listening and Democrats were asked to us come and I said ‘Why not, this is my way of voting.’ That’s my right. There are so many people who don’t exercise that right. This is my way of saying ‘Hey, I’ve had enough.’”

Democratic stagiest Joe DiSano has been on an active campaign to get Democrats out for Santorum in effort to hurt Romney. He recorded a robo call and has sent tens of thousands of e-mails to Democratic voters encouraging them to go to the polls.

“We are turning them out and feel we can provide a massive jolt and scare to the GOP establishment here in the state and in Washington, DC. When we are done they’ll be taking Pepto Bismol by the gallon at the RNC,” DiSano told CNN Tuesday.

“If Romney were able to close the deal, a religious fanatic like Rick Santorum would not have a chance in a state like Michigan. And I’m going to do everything I can to make sure Santorum turns out to be the winner tonight,” he said.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/28/democrats-in-michigan-explain-crossover-vote-campaign/

And from CNNLiveBlog:

6:28 p.m. ET – @DanaBashCNN interviewed a Michigan voter who considers himself a Democrat but voted for Santorum, who he said would be the least competitive candidate against President Barack Obama in 2012. How did he feel after he voted? “A little dirty … went home and showered,” he replied.

 

Florida is a closed primary

Darin_H (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 6:56PM EDT (link)

This is not the text you’re looking for.

A visionary coward says that anger can be power, as long as there’s a victim on TV – Flat Top, Goo Goo Dolls

 

exit polls in Michigan

septembergurl (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 7:03PM EDT (link)

They show Democrap voting at about 10%, compared to 7% in 2008 (where there was a Dem primary of ourse). I think in 2000 there was much more Dem voting in Michigan Rep primary — maybe 19% or so.

Anyway perhaps not so much of a factor this time.

The hacks at Pollutico have Mitt winning.

 

The current delegate count

Scope (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 7:06PM EDT (link)

according to CNN just now.

Romney-127
Gingrich-38
Santorum-37
Paul-27

Depending on tonight’s election results, the most of the delegates will be split between Romney and Santorum. Just as Gingrich argued the Fla. winner take all primary, I wonder if that was ever decided, and if AZ will remain a winner take all state. We will see if the RNC holds to their own rules.

 

where are the dems for romney? Oh wait, there aren't any...

jon11 Tuesday, February 28th at 7:09PM EDT (link)

just paul bagala and EE and Markos Moulitsas…

all for santorum in michigan.

vs the republicans

 

Ya right.

unsk Tuesday, February 28th at 7:10PM EDT (link)

Romney has not run a campaign on issues. He has run a smear campaign built on lies.

Both he and Santorum are disgusting. I will never vote for either one if they are the nominee. Santorum is just acting like the conservative big union pro life democrat he really is. Both hate the free market and want to ignore the Constitution.

And don’t tell me how moral Santorum is. As Catholics, we are called to be known by our good works. Where are his? We are told to love our neighbor and to love the sinner but hate the sin. Doesn’t seem to apply to ol’ sanctimonius Rick. Rick is drawn to the most extreme, inflammatory aspects of Catholic theology and exploits them in a way that is not Christian to burnish his evangelical street cred.

 

So, let's look at it like this:

usedtobelib Tuesday, February 28th at 7:10PM EDT (link)

Pretend Mitt Romney never entered the field this election cycle: Say, Santorum, Perry, Paul, Gingrich, Bachmann, (I left out Cain because he still would have had his same troubles, and I left out Pawlenty because he dropped out quickly when anyone else got votes).

I say not one of the candidates listed–Santorum,, Perry, Paul, Gingrich, Bachmann (remove her if you wish since she did drop out) could beat Obama because no way could they get some Democratic voters who aren’t fond of Obama nor could they persuade Indies to go their way. Not_one_of_these, even w/out Romney in the field.

So I fail to see where the backers of the others get off saying Romney is preventing a REAL CONSERVATIVE from a chance of winning the Presidency since these candidates stand NO chance of winning it anyway.

You conveniently left out Huntsman

goodgovernance Tuesday, February 28th at 7:17PM EDT (link)

And the fact of the matter is, you cannot assume the field of candidates doesn’t change if Romney hadn’t been in the race. That’s the whole point – Romney’s presence prevented a stronger, more authentic conservative candidate from getting in (or was at least one of the reasons, his presence alone wasn’t the only thing).

Bottom line: we’re better off without Romney in the race than we are with him in.

 

Romney was the establishment pick with money

Republican_Michigander (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 7:22PM EDT (link)

If he was out, someone else would have probably jumped in that didn’t. Or stay in. Pawlenty and Huntsman are two likely ones. I would have for either of those two if they were still in.

Instead I voted for Santorum, the best left of the four. Romney was my last choice.

Less Government, More Freedom

http://republicanmichigander.blogspot.com

 
 

Careful Romneybots!

WillWong (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 7:11PM EDT (link)

WashPost-ABC News Poll: Romney’s Stature Among Conservatives Plunging

Read more on Newsmax.com: WashPost-ABC News Poll: Romney’s Stature Among Conservatives Plunging
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama’s Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/favorability-Arizona-Michigan-primaries/2012/02/28/id/430880

 

Supporting Democrats voting in the Republican Primary is just wrong

nepanyrush Tuesday, February 28th at 7:49PM EDT (link)

Conservatives should hold principle above an “ends justify the means” politics. If Democrats are crossing over to try and create mischief — if that is their motivation — then it is just wrong. I held the same position when Rush was pushing Republicans to support Hillary. I felt that he was advocating something that would cause the loss of the moral position . I never felt comfortable with what Rush was doing, and it is only made worse by his repeating as a reason that it creates excitement and helps ratings (a statement he made again today.)

I like Rick Santorum a lot, and he does have genuine appeal to conservative Democrats and independents. If the rules are that Democrats can vote in Republican primaries, and they cross over because they like a candidate, then those are the rules. But if they are crossing over because of the Daily Kos position of creating mischief, then it is wrong.

Regardless, I do not understand a conservative stalwart like EE defending the policy of Democrats crossing over and voting in Republican primaries. Republicans should select their own candidates, not let the Democrats help select them.

I fear that Rick Santorum is going to be hurt by running these robocalls at the last minute because of the open campaign by Daily Kos and Michael Moore to support Democrats voting for him. He should have pulled the plug on this, both because of his own stated view that Democrats should not vote in the GOP primary and because the appearance will hurt him down the line. He has a very good shot of winning the GOP nod, but now Romney can spin this (and who would blame him) and Santorum also loses the moral high ground.

Is the kind of things conservatives want to support?

nepanyrush Tuesday, February 28th at 7:58PM EDT (link)

f Mitt Romney loses Michigan tonight, it could be because of people like Dennis Budziszewski, 63, of Canton. A diehard Democrat and retired autoworker, Budziszewski cast a ballot for former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum. Come November, he will vote for President Barack Obama.”

“Some Democrats have put together a fairly organized effort to get Democrats to vote for Santorum or Ron Paul in order to rob victory from Romney.”

“The Michigan Republican Party made a big mistake by basically inviting Democrats to vote in their primary,” said O’Donnell, a firm Obama supporter. “Voting for Santorum was a no-brainer. The longer the primary goes on, the more time there will be to find some more skeletons on Mitt Romney.”

“Elisabeth Steegman, 44, of Sterling Heights also voted for Santorum to help Obama. “My father is probably rolling over in his grave” because she voted for a Republican, Steegman said.

“It’s one way to get a vote for the person you want to win. It’s a little stinky,” she admitted, but worth it. ”

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120228/NEWS15/120228049/Many-Democrats-voting-Santorum-Paul-deny-Romney-Michigan-win&odyssey=mod|breaking|text|FRONTPAGE

Romney's folks made the rules

Republican_Michigander (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 8:19PM EDT (link)

I pushed for a caucus system instead of an open primary. I have no guilt over seeing this because I was on top of this issue back in August. What I didn’t expect is for it to help Santorum, who I think is stronger in a general election than Romney.

Less Government, More Freedom

http://republicanmichigander.blogspot.com

 
 
 

No

brah Tuesday, February 28th at 8:36PM EDT (link)

Republicans should be deciding Republican primaries.

And Santorum is doing it with a robocall disparaging Romney for NOT supporting the auto-bailout. Of course in the call he doesn’t mention that he would have voted against the auto-bailout. And 99% of the people who frequent this site did NOT support the auto-bailout. But since it is Anti-Romney, it gets commended with front page status on this site.

 

I have been watching the liberal comedy hour on CNN!

rickbull Tuesday, February 28th at 8:38PM EDT (link)

They think that they are going to throw the GOP into disarray by voting for Santorum in Michigan . . . excuse me for a moment . . .

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Sorry, couldn’t hold that in.

WE ARE THE 53% (who actually pay taxes).

 

so Redstate has no coverage

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 9:06PM EDT (link)

of Romney winning both states tonight…

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

 

it's like the primaries are no longer happening

Ender (Diary) Tuesday, February 28th at 9:13PM EDT (link)

but looks like Santorum misfired trying to get the liberal dems to vote for him so publicly. That playing all over the media yesterday and today almost definitely swung some republicans back to Romney.

“To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it.” AR

 

My liberal Monster in Law will vote for Santorum

Seedyrom (Diary) Wednesday, February 29th at 10:43AM EDT (link)

in the GA primary then Obama in November. Smart woman, annoying except when sleeping. Nuff said on monsters.

I have no problem with Santorum calling all dems, call them all unless they feel a detached rich 1 percenter is good enough for them. Fact is Santorum or Newt will ignite the party and that’s what we need to boost November turnout.

 

Rather Than Look At Our Country....We Have This!

rightland1111 Wednesday, February 29th at 12:13PM EDT (link)

Looking at motives and listening very closely to Levin and sifting it through my mind, I have come to this conclusion. I will vote for anyone but Obama…..but…from the noise I am hearing around my neighborhood (very Conservative)….they don’t like Romney…and that is not good for the GOP. This is the base of the party. Will they go to the polls…don’t know. They are buying survival food and bullets.

When Romney was debating Perry he made some remark to the effect that education was at the top in MA. Levin pointed out the that Romney’s governorship has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION. Yet…WILLARD took credit for it. God…I sometimes think I am listening to Obama.

Then we have Santorum. Goodie…he is going to revive the manufacturing in this country. How…Rick…do we pay more taxes to make up for their 0% tax rate????????????? Oh…and where does most of the money go to these days…THE UNIONS!

That leaves me with only one person to vote for…Gingrich because at least he has ideas and can get things DONE. And, while I am at it…what happened to our Grand Old Party? Can’t they see that if this circus continues to go on…i.e., Romney at Santorum’s throat and vice versa, we are going to lose.

The press has blocked out Gingrich…same as they did Perry. That is who the the threat is to Obama…not Santorum…not Romney.

As a side note…Snowe decided to retire…and guess what…that leaves us JUST TWO WEEKS to find someone else to run in her place in Maine. Oh well…I hope DeMint is still looking for Conservative candidates.