« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Jon Bruning: The Eric Holder Republican

Don Stenberg has actually won more statewide races in Nebraska than Jon Bruning, but the facts don’t seem to matter to this Eric Holder Republican.”

At a time when Republicans of all stripes are calling for the resignation of U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, one Republican continues to stand by his side.

Meet Jon Bruning, candidate for U.S. Senate and the sitting Attorney General for Nebraska.

Last week, we learned that Bruning lobbied the Senate to support Holder during his confirmation process. As President-Elect of the National Association of Attorneys General in 2009, Bruning co-signed two letters to the Senate Judiciary Committee praising Holder for his “fairness and balance” and urged members to confirm him. Bruning wrote: “We believe that Mr. Holder has the knowledge and experience necessary to run the Department of Justice and work with us to enforce our laws.”

Bruning of course was not alone in this. There were other Republicans who signed these letters, and some Republican Senators voted to confirm him. But many Republicans also opposed him – and importantly… for those who didn’t, they now understand how bad Eric Holder is and would likely admit they made a mistake.

But not Jon Bruning.

When asked by the Omaha World-Herald about his previous support for Eric Holder’s unconscionable guns-to-Mexico program – “Fast and Furious,” Bruning declined to talk about it. Instead, he deflected by defending his record on gun rights.

Nice try, but the fact Jon Bruning backed Eric Holder in 2009 and is now unwilling to admit it was a mistake shows that he’s clearly not the conservative he holds himself out to be – and worse, he apparently is willing to stand by an aggressively liberal Attorney General who abuses the rule of law.

Setting aside for a moment the disastrous Fast and Furious program – let’s consider how bad Holder is, and how inexcusable it is for Bruning to stand by him. Even before his confirmation, Holder’s problem with truthfulness was clear to anyone who followed his intimate involvement with the dubious Marc Rich pardon by Bill Clinton and subsequent shady testimony about it in Congressional hearings. But since he became Attorney General, Holder and his DOJ have aggressively challenged religious freedom (the right of churches to hire folks who share their faith), challenged Voter ID laws, challenged state immigration laws, and even had to take the highly unusual step of withdrawing its own Section 5 Voting Rights Act objection.

But for Holder to countenance a DOJ program that sent guns to drug cartels and gangs in Mexico is beyond comprehension and shows a total lack of devotion either to the rule of law or the spirit of the 2nd Amendment. But many conservatives knew when Holder was being confirmed that he held extreme views against gun rights. This is why the NRA opposed Holder’s confirmation and it’s why 21 Republicans in the Senate voted against Holder’s confirmation, including Jon Bruning’s home state Republican Senator, Mike Johanns. In a letter to a constituent explaining his opposition to Holder, Senator Johanns wrote:

“Of particular concern to me was Mr. Holder’s antagonistic record on the Second Amendment. As both a private citizen and public servant, Eric Holder has been a zealous advocate of gun control regulation, working against the interests of gun owners. I firmly believe that the Second Amendment’s individual right to bear arms is an important right for millions of Americas and future generations to come, and I am concerned that the strength of Mr. Holder’s convictions may hinder his ability to defend the Second Amendment to its fullest extent.”

Republicans knew Holder was a bad apple from the beginning. It’s why they opposed his confirmation and it’s why countless Republicans are now calling for Holder’s resignation.

Not Jon Bruning.

Jon Bruning is trying to hide his liberal record just long enough to win the May 15 primary for U.S. Senate against conservative Don Stenberg. Each time he’s asked about a flaw in his record, Bruning dodges and attacks Stenberg for losing several statewide races. Of course, Don Stenberg has actually won more statewide races in Nebraska than Jon Bruning, but the facts don’t seem to matter to this Eric Holder Republican.

Conservatives in Nebraska should know that if they vote for Jon Bruning, they’re voting for a Republican who still can’t bring himself to oppose Obama’s Attorney General. The primary is two months away so now is the time for conservatives to support Don Stenberg.

COMMENTS

  • renl57

    I just checked the Tea Party Express website, and they’re still endorsing Bruning.

    http://www.teapartyexpress.org/2012-endorsements

    I would hate to split conservatives, with the Tea Party supporting Bruning while RedState opposes him.

    Instead, Erick Erickson should take his concerns about Bruning directly to the Tea Party Express, and see if they will reconsider their endorsement of Bruning.

  • danevansrepublican

    He has lost three statewide races for the U.S. Senate in a Republican state and we want to put him up against Bob Kerrey? Over one issue (an important issue granted)? Really!?!

  • edintexas

    As you are concerned about the TP Express* position on this Primary, why don’t you take these concerns about Bruning up with them?

    *It should be pointed out that the “Tea Party Express” organization does not speak for all the Tea Party folks, or even a majority. I’ve heard that those who run the organization would like people to think they do, but that is just rumor of which I do not have proof.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    .

  • Juggernaut

    as well as they should of. The fact Bruni ignored the Fast and Furious question suggests this guy isn’t as conservative as he wants people to think. Either that or he’s afraid to take a position. Fake conservatives have a hard time criticizing the left.

  • drohan00

    But I get your points. He has lost statewide a lot too. We have been put in an odd position, but I think Don Stenberg was a good attorney general as well.

    Don Stenberg will have a more difficult time against Kerrey because he is a cold fish in public. That does not mean he isn’t electable. That does not mean he won’t serve Nebraskans with pride in Washington, which he will do. But he isn’t a glad-hander. He is results oriented, not style oriented.

    He is also a very good man. The GOP bigwigs in Nebraska want Bruning because he will be a sexier candidate. They want Bruning because he will get the Lincoln and Omaha moderate to liberal Republicans to vote for him, who might otherwise go to Bob Kerrey. I hope we get Stenberg. But the party brass is gunning for Bruning.

    However if Bruning and Stenberg split the vote enough, state Senator Deb Fisher of Valentine just might win, and that would not be half bad either.

  • tnguy

    ….lose with a conservative than win with a liberal republican.

  • Whacker77

    Time to move onto new options. I prefered Heineman, but Bruning is a proven statewide winner. We can’t afford to muff a great pickup chance like we did in 2010 with Angle and COD. I appreciate and understand the reasons not to support Bruning, but he’s not some liberal in sheep’s clothing.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Don’t accept the unfounded premise that Kerrey is a force statewide anymore.

  • danevansrepublican

    We are in the early stages of his campaign. Do you really think that once someone with Kerrey’s background is spending money on reminding folks why they liked him so much, he isn’t going to be a force?

  • drohan00

    He doesn’t have to be a force statewide Neil. He only has to win in Douglas, Sarpy, and Lancaster Counties, where half of all Nebraskans live. Then he just needs to get enough votes from ethanol dependent farmers to make it the rest of the way.

    I still know Republicans from Lincoln and Omaha who liked Kerrey and voted for him against Jan Stoney in 1994, even after he voted for Clinton’s 1993-94 budget. (Yes Nebraska of all places bucked the Republican tide that swept throughout America.)

    We have to be serious here. Nebraska “independents” like Kerrey, always have. He will lose 80-85 of Nebraska’s 93 counties, but he can still win statewide. Bob Kerrey is a force and if we don’t believe it, speaking as a Nebraskan, we will come to regret it.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    That 2 polls with him down double figures means he’s going to recover ANY DAY NOW?

    Please.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    You’re dreaming.

  • drohan00

    and then he began the charm offensive. I tell you I wish you were right. And I would love it if you were, but my God, I have seen him come out of nowhere before, so we need to be wary and prepared to fight hand-to-hand combat.

  • renl57

    A Republican Senate majority is a Republican Senate majority.

    The first most important thing a Republican Senator can do is help Mitch McConnell get to 51 senators. Even if that’s all that senator does.

    And it’s vital that conservative have a Republican Senate majority as a firewall in case Obama gets re-elected.

  • carolina

    Sounds like he is going to be tough to defeat in the primary
    If BO is defeated, which takes Holder out, does Bruning have other black marks?

  • carolina

    Sounds like he is going to be tough to defeat in the primary
    If BO is defeated, which takes Holder out, does Bruning have other black marks?

  • repubnut

    I have only one word for Holder—IMPEACHMENT

  • downstateray

    We the people should reject the Tea Party Express. This pay to play outfit brazenly hijacks the name of the movement. It is NOT the representative of the Tea Party nationally. Because it hijacked the name it has successfully confused the general public, and ran off a bunch of folks with its antics, missteps, and follies.

    Has anyone had an accounting of the money it takes in? Somebody is taking down a wad of cash.

  • Juggernaut

    a long time ago. That poll says Bob Who? Nebraska is Fed Up with dems.