« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

By Jon Bruning’s Own Logic, Is He Into Gay Marriage and Inappropriate Relationships With Kids?

What a miserable question to have to ask about Nebraska Attorney General and Republican Senate Candidate Jon Bruning — in effect is he, at best, a creepy pervert and at worst a monster. But before you pick up pitch forks and torches against me for asking the question, you need to understand that this is Jon Bruning’s own tortured logic in the Nebraska Senate Republican Primary.

Jon Bruning, the Attorney General of Nebraska all but accused his primary opponent, Don Stenberg, of being a pedophile. Bruning did so in a Senate primary debate when the debate kept coming back to Jon Bruning still defending Barack Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder.

I wish I were making it up, but I am not. Even the Democrats in Nebraska had to jump in and point out that based on Jon Bruning’s “evidence” about Don Stenberg, Jon Bruning is guilty of the same.

I warned each and every one of you that Jon Bruning had a reputation for being a hot head who would meltdown under the pressure of a campaign. As appalling as it is, he has done so. If he’s resorting to suggesting his primary opponent is a pedophile to distract from inconvenient facts about his support of Eric Holder, to what new depths will the man sink in a general election? To what extent will he embarrass the GOP?

Two nights ago the Nebraska Republicans had a Senate primary debate. When Bruning was pressed on his support for Eric Holder, he deflected and lobbed a bombshell attack against State Treasurer Don Stenberg. He claimed that Stenberg inappropriately tried to follow his 14-year-old daughter on Twitter.

I thought he was just going to say Stenberg was guilty of dragging his family into the race as a way to dig up dirt. But no. Bruning said it was “weird” and “creepy” for a “62-year-old man” to follow a “14-year-old girl” on Twitter. Of course Don Stenberg doesn’t manage his Twitter account and campaigns typically follow lots of people they don’t know and even follow their opponents’ families’ twitter accounts. But Bruning, who I bet does not manage his own twitter account, claimed Stenberg’s campaign tried to follow Bruning’s daughter as evidence that Stenberg is a pedophile.

Yesterday, the Democrats highlighted that Bruning is following several teenage girls on Twitter. Oops. And there’s still no evidence that Stenberg’s campaign requested access to Bruning’s daughter’s locked account.

When someone tries to follow a locked account on Twitter, the owner of the locked account receives an email request to do so. Bruning’s campaign has yet to come forward with that email. Even if it did, the campaign cannot show that Stenberg himself manages his own Twitter account.

Conservatives should avoid Jon Bruning like the plague. He didn’t want to defend his outrageous support for Eric Holder so he made a wild, unsubstantiated attack against an honorable man. He’s used to doing whatever is necessary to win elections. That’s why he’s been on both sides of nearly every issue and it’s why he’s smearing Stenberg today.

Oh, and by Jon Bruning’s own logic, I presume he is a supporter of same sex marriage and gay rights. As you can see from this screenshot, in addition to following several teenage girls on Twitter, Jon Bruning also follows the NOH8 campaign on Twitter — the gay rights group advocating against Proposition 8 in California.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • davesinsanantonio

    in the general election, but what he would do after elected. This kind of ego that says “win at any cost”, usually indicates a person without basic principles. Winning at any cost is what drives politicians, not statesmen. It is also what drives liberals, not conservatives.
    People who throw out wild, unsubstantiated accusations are not what we need in the Senate. Indeed, they are not what we need in any level or branch of government. Nor, do we need people who cannot or will not explain their actions which are part of the public record. People who refuse to admit they made a mistake are also not people we should give additional power to. Electing such a person to the Senate would be a huge mistake, and that mistake would most likely grow huger the longer he was there.
    I hope the good people of Nebraska will understand that Bruning, by his own actions, has made himself morally and politically ineligible for their vote.

  • http://www.thepurpleheart.com/recipient/RecipientDetails.aspx?wid=7f39cbbe-5213-4983-9702-50132a1c73 rsmith7042

    Last time Americans elected a win-at-all-costs pervert to high office, he was impeached and disbarred for perjury, accused of rape, and a proven serial adulterer.

  • Seedyrom

    paints a target on their back. If you can’t prove it or lead the media towards a source then don’t expose yourself to ridicule nor embarrass the party.

  • mikwcas

    when these candidates believe that the ends justify the means they are essentially telling everyone that they have no real value system except the maintenece of their precious egos. that is why mitt spends all his money attacking his opponents, of whom someday he will need the support of.

  • Flagstaff

    This kind of ego that says ?win at any cost?, usually indicates a person without basic principles….

    …they are not what we need in any level or branch of government. Nor, do we need people who cannot or will not explain their actions which are part of the public record. People who refuse to admit they made a mistake are also not people we should give additional power to. Electing such a person to the Senate would be a huge mistake, and that mistake would most likely grow huger the longer he was there.

    There should be some campaign ads to this effect.

    The last two Democrat presidents have suffered from this symdrome.

  • lesliemj

    Gay rights are wrong
    From an article written by
    Dr. Henry Makow

    Under the guise of being a persecuted minority seeking human rights, homosexual activists are actually using the state to persecute heterosexuals. They are waging successful war against heterosexuality — masculinity, femininity, marriage and the nuclear family, the sources of our identity, love and meaning.

    .?Nevertheless lesbian feminist and gay activists, by their own admission, are dedicated to recasting society in their own image. They want replace heterosexual norms with homosexual ones.
    ….Since 1970, gay-feminist activists have waged a campaign to foster homosexuality among heterosexuals. They are candid about this goal. “The end goal of the feminist revolution is the elimination of the sex distinction itself,” says Shulamith Firestone (The Dialectic of Sex, 1972, p.11)

    http://www.henrymakow.com/

  • rhampton

    1. Open mouth
    2. Insert foot