« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

BREAKING: David Axelrod Endorses Mitt Romney for President

Resist We Much!

Breaking news with a hat tip to Kevin Eder for highlighting it for me:

David Axelrod, Chief Strategist for President Barack Obama, endorsed Mitt Romney for President on Fox News Sunday this morning. He told Chris Wallace, “The choice in this election is between an economy that produces a growing middle class and that gives people a chance to get ahead and their kids a chance to get ahead and an economy that continues down the road we’re on.”

That is precisely right and precisely what Mitt Romney’s campaign has been telling people. Good to see David Axelrod agrees.

I couldn’t have said it better myself. You can see for yourself right here.

COMMENTS

  • clintonformccain

    … can EE be far behind with an endorsement? :)

  • garfieldjl

    Either Axelrod is turning on Obama for some reason (unlikely), or he is basically saying he expects Romney to be just like Obama, or he is saying it to try to get Republicans to jump on the Romney bandwagon then steal the wheels on the wagon (most likely).

  • jon11

    …well this and the fact that he has more (and in my opinion more relevant) executive experience than Gingrich or Santorum.

    The good readers here at redstate need to understand one thing: this election is ours to lose. It has been for some time and it is only more so with each passing day. Obama simply cannot win this election running on classwarfare and ‘fairness.’

    Listen carefully to me I’ve been saying this over a year.

    It. Will. Not. Happen.

    Obama is vapid. All he’s got are gimmicks, like the buffet rule. And what your
    beginning to witness is the fear settling into the hearts of even his most ardent defenders and apologists.

    Romney won’t blow it.

    And our nominee blowing it is the only prayer Obama has of winning.

    Dems of course knew that all along, which is why they hoped so desperately that we’d take Santorum or newt…

    They wanted this election to be a referendum on the republican nominee. Romney makes it a referendum on the president.

  • tdawg89

    The guy just misspoke. Funny, but not a lasting gaffe unfortunately.

  • tdawg89

    Though I had hopes that many of our candidates could beat him. I just hope we get a couple more conservative senators in there to keep Romney honest.

  • garfieldjl

    Get out of tunnel vision mode for a second and stop to consider why Soros approves of Romney and Axelrod approves of him…

  • CarolT

    This man needs a teleprompter as much as Obama. I hope Obama is in a snit again.

  • garfieldjl

    What he said was calculated and carefully thought out, while the possibility exists that it was a gaffe, the likelihood is rather slim. It wouldn’t surprise me if he got Obama’s approval to say it.

  • whothennow24

    I don’t know how many people here watched the actual video, but there is no mention of Romney in it at all, and as I understand Axelrod, he’s enthusiastic about this administration’s direction. He didn’t endorse Romne at all. Sheesh. This is about as horrible a misleading headline as anything you’ll read on MSNBC.

  • whothennow24

    Axelrod doesn’t approve of Romney. He didn’t endorse Romney. Watch the video, don’t just read the headline. The headline is an outright lie. Axelrod is being enthusiastic in the video about the Obama administration, not about Romney.

  • whothennow24

    Watch the video. Axelrod didn’t mention Romney at all. Axelrod was expressing his enthusiasm for the direction Obama is taking.

  • elayman

    n/t

  • snowshooze

    Ha.

  • sta46

    I’m watching Axelrod vigorously defend the little communist on Mike Wallace as we speak. Thinks all the D’s plans are the way to go and “best for the country”.

  • whothennow24

    You’re really missing out if you can’t watch the video. Axelrod makes no mention of Romney, and only expresses his enthusiasm for the direction of the Obama administration. I don’t know what the heck is wrong with whoever wrote this headline. It’s shameful.

  • garfieldjl

    Erick has a stronger stomach than I do.

  • whothennow24

    Exactly. It’s either corrupt sensationalism (lying in the headline and hoping no one watches the video), or a late April Fools joke.

  • CarolT

    Alexrod is from the Chicago machine and they do everything on purpose. I am sure that he it was a calculated statement.
    I was hoping he made a mistake, in the same way Obama says corpsman, his Memorial Day comments, etc.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Get educated.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Maybe when you watch the video you’ll stop hyperventilating.

    Do you have any clue what you’re talking about, son?

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Corrupt? Get lost, punk.

  • ihateliberals

    Thank your Mr. Axelrod. between you and Rosen we are off to a good start. Even though I don’t like Romney I don’t like Obama more. Romeny is the lesser of two evils.

  • bakedflounder

    There was no mention of Romney. Axelrod just compared two opposite economies. Unless there was more to this video, it’s a stretch to declare that Axelrod “endorses” Romney. Be responsible.

  • Martin Knight

    The choice in this election is between an economy that produces a growing middle class and that gives people a chance to get ahead and their kids a chance to get ahead and an economy that continues down the road we?re on.

    Exactly who is taking us down the road we’re on? Obama.

    Think.

  • aesthete

    just how similar the rhetoric of the two mainstream candidates is.

    Romney might fool or otherwise convince some folk, but I don’t see how Obama gets to trot out that old warhorse, and expect to do well. His major policies so far have either not at all helped the middle class, or been explicitly against their interest — ObamaCare comes to mind as a big one. What can Obama point to in his record that would support his claim, when people already know what he’s done and why it would be bad for them on a personal, financial level? Plus, Obama’s only gotten more partisan and whiny in office — transcendental rhetoric about the middle class only works when you haven’t been dismissing them for 3 years now. Fool me once, shame on you…

  • johninohio

    If you take the video as presented (I don’t know if there was any sound bite editing on it), Axlerod doesn’t tell you which side of his dichotomy Obama is on because obviously, he meant the ‘growing of the middle class’ meme was intended for Obama, and since Romney is Obama’s presumed opponent, then Romney gets the ‘going down the current road’ meme. However, how can Axlerod say that Romney (or any Republican) is going down the current road, when it’s obviously Obama and the Democrats who are ‘on the current road’. Their the ones in power. They chose the ‘current road’. To a pro-Romney conservative, his remarks are more logical if the memes are reversed. And that’s why the headline says Axlerod endorsed Romney. It’s tongue-in-cheek. Nobody would believe Axlerod actually endorsed Romney.

    Why does anyone need this to be explained??

  • Ender

    he constantly misrepresents here, and obviously has an agenda.

  • raginpatriot

    >>The good readers here at redstate need to understand one thing: this election is ours to lose.

    Uh, if by “ours” you mean the Republican establishment / Ruling Class Republicans, then I suppose you are correct.

    As for us Constitutional Conservatives (or any variety of conservative), we don’t have a candidate in this election, so it is already lost.

    All we have is Certain Disaster(D) vs. Lesser of Two Evils (R).

  • drifter

    This was a silly point…

  • ennaneko

    would have preferred Rick Perry.

    I think Romney has a tough fight in front of him and I think he’s the weakest candidate the GOP could run.

    Luckily for Romney… enough people on both sides could be angry enough to vote against Obama.

    I think it’s too much of a gamble. If Romney wins whoever is working for his campaign will be labeled a political genius but if he loses… it will be ugly.

  • out4tea

    This is a misleading headline and article. Period!!!

    Here’s the transcript from the interview. It’s obvious Axelrod was supporting Obama. Anyone can take something out of context and conduct themself like the Liberal Media; which you claim to condemn.

    When you use the same tactics, how does that make you better????

    Please stop making fools of yourself and get with the true conservative program.

    Transcript from Fox News Sunday:

    WALLACE: Well, I think you went off to your talking points.

    But in any case, Fox News came out with a new poll this week and I want to put it up on the screen. It shows Romney with a slight edge over the president, although they’re basically tied. And the president’s approval rating is back down to 42 percent and 51 percent disapproving.

    Even with all of the battering that Romney has taken during this long primary season, he’s basically running neck and neck with the president. And your guy is at this point well below the 50 percent approval rating, which is generally considered crucial for a president seeking reelection.

    My question is — isn’t Barack Obama very vulnerable?

    AXELROD: Well, I don’t think we should spend a whole lot of time on your poll, Chris, because in February, you had the poll, the partisan spread was eight points different than it is now. And unless you believe that there are 7 million less Democrats in America today and 6 million more Republicans than there were in February, I wouldn’t put much credence in this. There were other public polls that have a much different result in the same time period.

    That said — and by the way, in your poll, the only — where you have us plummeting, but doing better among independents than we did in February. There isn’t a person in America who knows something about this who would say that possibly could be true.

    That said, we’ve always said this was going to be is a close race. It’s a closely divided country. We won 53 percent of the vote in 2008 with the wind in our back. Of course, it’s going to be close.

    But at the end of the day, I think the American people want to choose a vision to hold out the greatest possible opportunity for them and for the middle class that want to see our economy rebuilt in the way –

    WALLACE: Let me –

    (CROSSTALK)

    AXELROD: That will give them their best chance and not go back to the policies that got us into this mess in the first place.

    (CROSSTALK)

    WALLACE: And that is, David, if I may, I wanted to ask you in the final question I have. In one paragraph, two or three sentences, what’s the choice in this election?

    AXELROD: The choice in this election is between economy that produces a growing middle class and that gives people a chance to get ahead and their kids a chance to get ahead, and an economy that continues down the road we are on, where a fewer and fewer number of people do very well, and everybody else is running faster and faster just to keep pace.

    We need to take that first route that honors our fundamental economic values, the values that made this country great. And we need to do some things to promote that kind of economy. We can’t sit back and go back to the same failed policies that were so disastrous in the last decade.

  • halle

    This is from an article by Michael Santos.

    Romney was vetted in 1994 by the most vicious political machine in the nation (that of Ted Kennedy), and they were unable to find anything dirty on him.
    As governor of Massachusetts, not only did he balance their budget, decreased spending, but he did not get involved in any crony capitalism deals. He did not pass any legislation to favor or enrich his political donors. Can any other of the politicians running claim that?

  • Bill S

    …the next time you use the term “true conservative,” I’m going to ban you.

  • ennaneko

    Now Obama has a legion of aggressive supporters and the interwebs to dig up and compile dirt on his opponent.

  • elayman

    All Axelrod needs to do really is to point out that Romney’s tax plan offers massive tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations, a job creation record in Massachusetts that was one of the worst in the country etc in contrast to the president’s policies which have either been voted down or haven’t had time to fully take effect. I am not buying but on a point by point analysis it also isn’t a completely unreasonable line of attack.

  • Mark Meed

    To all the sleuths on this thread who uncovered the fact that Axelrod was actually talking about *Obama* please consider yourself nominated for the “lightning grasp of the self-evident” award then run, don’t walk, to dictionary.com and look up “irony”.

  • halle

    There was no mention of Romney. I did not see any thing that
    would even suggest that he was supporting Romney.
    All I saw was the same old boring talking points.

  • monster

    Or there is a run of people with no sense of irony at RedState today. How could anyone with any sense really think EE really meant Axelrod would say verbatim that he supported Romney. In the embedded clip however, he clearly does seem to make a case against the past 3 years.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Here we were, being told that this guy was an authentic political genius and everything, and it turns out that he literally cannot adapt the 2008 campaign narrative to handle the realities of 2012. It’s the most hysterical thing I’ve seen today: the whole Wallace interview was the journalistic equivalent of a curbstomping.

  • checkmate2012

    especially when he tried to refute the poll numbers and wanted to use the numbers from 6-8 months ago! And continuous reference to, “back to the same failed policies that got us here” is really ironic as he is unknowingly referring to this admin’s failed policies that are keeping us here. Priceless.

  • out4tea

    I get just as tired of strong arming “true conservatives” as I do of Liberals.
    RedState will soon be out of readers at this rate!!!!

  • doctorbob

    Axelrod is not endorsing Romney in his comments. Axelrod is attempting to usurp Romney’s position and claim they are Obama’s positions. Later, Axelrod will try to claim that Romney is stealing Obama’s positions! You have to watch this pack of swine like a hawk. They are slippery and devious, and will pretend the are something they are not. Certainly these positions given by Axelrod are NOT what Obama is all about. But, Obama’s followers are blind as bats, and will slurp it up, claiming that this describes Obama. Meanwhile, Obama will be over on the side, bankrupting yet another American industry, destroying more of the middle class, ruining everything in sight. And as it collapses, Axelrod and Jarrett will blame Bush! These are snakes we’re watching, people. Treat their words as coming from snakes.

  • Martin Knight

    The choice in this election is between economy that produces a growing middle class and that gives people a chance to get ahead and their kids a chance to get ahead, and an economy that continues down the road we are on, where a fewer and fewer number of people do very well, and everybody else is running faster and faster just to keep pace.

    Now ask yourself; who’s the President? Who had supermajorities in both Houses of Congress for two years and currently has his party in charge of the Senate? Who got an $800 billion stimulus package passed?

    Who put us on the road we’re on?

    For the smarter folks reading this, yes, Axelrod just planted both feet in his mouth.

  • halle

    I listen to people who have actually know Romney or who
    worked with him. This is just one example.
    I worked with Mitt to run the Olympic games, and we were so bankrupt until he came along…man that guy knows how to run things and how to treat people with kindness and decency. He gives tirelessly of himself, all for free, just to make people happy and never charging a dime. I’ve never seen anything turn around so much so fast. He runs a very efficient ship and everyone gets along so well. His enthusiasm and kindness were so infectious, he convinced 40,000 people to willingly sign up to work 2 1/2 weeks for free to run the games. They could see their time wouldn’t be wasted. Everyone knew he was going to be president someday, and if he isn’t, this nation will have missed out on the best president this nations ever had. He’s honest and trustworthy, always does what he says he’ll do, and he’s prepared and smart. Mitt Romney is a person who just forgets himself and goes to work and that’s what this nation needs.

  • veritaseequitas

    David at brunch, but he surely stepped in the dog pile with this comment.
    Did he endorse Romney? Not exactly, but his Freudian slip makes it sound as though he thinks Mitt Romney and the GOP are on the right road and Baracka and his vile policies need to go.
    Now this little faux pas needs to be used to harass and harry the left to make them look like rubes and losers.

  • Viet71

    You were given a clear, polite warning. But also a free pass to continue with your Dem infiltrator gibberish.

    Report back to your boss Markos that it’s limited open season on Red State. He’s smart; he’ll understand. But he’s also cynical, as are many of his readers. That’s why he sent you over here. Wise up.

  • out4tea

    This is the same old talking points the Dems have been using since GW took the oath!

    The point of this thread is that Eric took something out of context and made a statement that is untrue. I did not get the sarcasm if that is what’s intended.

    We can do better than that!!!!

  • Bill S

    Wanna guess who?

  • veritaseequitas

    desperate. And I really did not like the way Chris Wallace kept interrupting Ed Gillespie’s answers after he let Axelrod go on and on and on.

  • out4tea

    I only stuck around to see if you would really be so petty!

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    While you’re out for tea, get a brain.

  • Martin Knight

    Idiot.

    Who is a ghost.

  • jasonva

    I have been reading Redstate for years, and I don?t think I?ve ever seen so many people in one thread display such abject stupidity/ignorance.

    1. It is obvious that Axelrod is attemping to frame Romney as George W. Bush the Second, while implying that Obama is running against Bush?s record (Or, at least, their distortions of it – it worked last time, right?)

    2. Erick is using sarcasm to point out how absurd it is for Obama?s campaign (in the form of Axelrod) to ignore the fact that we are careening down ?the road we?re on? because Obama has been at the wheel for over three years.

    I was going to give these people the benefit of the doubt ? that they?re not dense or ignorant ?maybe they?re just trolls. Then I remembered that to be trolls they are necessarily both dense and ignorant (troll=Obama supporter=dense/ignorant).

    Ok, rant over…

  • acat

    That’s kind of the thing about genius .. it’s not an all-the-time or across-the-board kind of a thing… and especially in politics, both parties tend to smother “geniuses” under the guise of insulating or protecting them.

    No real surprise here in any case; Obama won on a massive influx of new voters, a sense of “history”, and an 8-year anti-Bush whine from the national press. Axelrod is not going to get that “perfect storm” again .. and good luck re-electing the LOTUS* without it.

    Mew

    *Loser Of The United States

  • kowalski

    Several years ago while I was still living in Chicago I had a really crazy impulse one night during election season – to call one of my arch-liberal family members, just to say hello and establish whether the craziness had left the planet, but also to remind her that I still existed and that in some sense, as a family member, I still loved her and cared about her.

    It was a tough decision to make. ;)

    Neverthless I went through with the phone call and listened to her tell me how much of a genius Bill Maher was and how evil Karl Rove was. That went on for too long a time, maybe five or six minutes, and then I said to her. “Well, I guess I can understand why you feel that way. I really don’t agree, though. You’ve constructed the Masquerade of Karl Rove into a caricature of itself and your judgment is suffering from it. Do you know what Karl Rove really is? He’s a big Nerd.”

    Karl Rove is, basically a big Nerd who really cares about the little details of numbers in very targeted election races all across the country in a way that basically nobody except Karl Rove would ever have the persistence to do. He’s also become quite a good writer over at the WSJ and I find all of his columns to be very reserved, insightful and almost overwhelmingly – yes – a little bit bland. He crunches the numbers and he pores over them. He collects all of his acidic juices and eats those numbers up and regurgitates them, which is probably closer to how his liberal enemies see him – as some kind of electoral insect. But basically he’s just a big Nerd and I’m glad we have him on our side.

    He’s the kind of guy who was transformed by the lurid imagination of Democrats into an almost demonic figure. Really, most of what he did was to crunch numbers and give his best take on those numbers after a lot of experience with the numbers. If you’re going to hate him, you should hate every really good actuary, not to mention any statistician at any decent university in this country.

  • Flagstaff

    Like a headline that says, “High Court Considers Pot.”

    As Herman Cain said, we need to get our sense of humor back.

    And this clip should find its way into some Republican ads.

  • Flagstaff

    It was just a sloppy aggregation of words. Or he forgot to add, “the road that George Bush told us to follow.”

  • kowalski

    I’ve always thought that one of his biggest liabilities in terms of public perception was his first name. But I didn’t choose his parents and I couldn’t tell them what to name their son.

    I would have gone with something like: “Charlie Rose.” Or maybe: “Elwood Rove.”

    Because even after all this, I think he’s jazzy. :) I wonder sometimes whether he shares my occasional affliction for the Blues.

  • renl57

    He pointed out that Obama’s policies were all passed: ObamaCare, the stimulus package, the nationalization of GM.

    And Christina Romer’s own economic forecast was that with those policies, the unemployment rate would be down to around 6% by now.

    GM’s nationalization hasn’t had time to take effect??? I thought that Obama wanted to divest of GM as soon as possible.

    The stimulus package hasn’t had time to take effect? The money ran out already and that’s why Krugman is begging the Fed to do another round of Quantitative Easing.

  • rabun1016

    So Axelrod really didn’t endorse Romney? Thanks so much for pointing this out throughout the blog.

  • rabun1016

    Romney is certainly no Rick Perry, I will agree.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Some of the tangents you go on are pretty wild. Have you considered become a writer of fiction? You seem to really get into the imaginary realm in some of your posts. You should explore that possibility because I think you have talent in that regard. Provides a little comic relief when you apply it to the world of politics.

  • renl57

    General Purpose Speech

    “My friends,
    “Today we stand at a crossroads. We have a choice to make.
    “Do we pursue policies that will lead us toward a bright future? A future of peace and prosperity?
    “Or do we want to return to the failed policies of the past?
    “Our choice is clear. We want to move toward the future, because we will soon be in the future.
    “We promise a new direction for America under new leadership.
    “And so, with our policies, Americans have no reason to doubt the future. America’s best days are still ahead.”

    This speech can be given by any candidate of any party at any time.

  • Flagstaff

    “And Bush!

  • Viet71

    n/t

  • Flagstaff

    of The Genius.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Quite a few compliments in there as I see it.

  • Flagstaff

    is what makes it funny.

  • kowalski

    I don’t think I’m that nuts. Karl Rove is really one of the best people we have on our side of the Ditch and despite all the anti-Establishment propaganda against him, I wouldn’t want to try and match him face-to-face in contest of electoral numbers prowess. He’s an encyclopedia of that information and it’s because he’s spent his life studying it. He’s a true devotee and a true savant of the numbers.

    There isn’t anyone in that respect who is better than he is, or maybe ever will be.

  • kowalski

    Axelrod followed Obama around with a camera for a long time in Chicago making unpublicized videos of him to hone the public perception and the messaging of who precisely Obama was supposed to be sold as. He was, as is Hilary Rosen, a Public Relations person who relies more on emotional perceptions, narrative, framing and such than he does numbers. Rove was not a “creative” force in my view, in the sense that he created images or wrote stories, or went back through his editing deck thinking about the visual and emotional portrayal of his subject. He was concerned about numbers and messaging.

    Axelrod and Rosen are different – they’re liberals. They’re more emotional, they rely much more on Lakoff’s theories, and they construct them visually. The Obama “Hope” Poster and the FONT that was created to render it – which very few people know the name of – were artistic endeavors meant to evoke Warhol and pull at the heartstrings of artists. Rove is, was, and always will be primarily a numbers guy albeit with a sense of what the underlying numbers mean. He’s less manipulative and more descriptive.

  • kowalski

    By the way, is — Gotham. It wasn’t created specifically for the Obama campaign, but it was elevated to an almost ludicrous level of prominence by their adoption of it and you can see it everywhere now.

    “Graphic designer Brian Collins noted that Gotham was the “linchpin” to Obama’s entire campaign imagery.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotham_(typeface)

  • elayman

    and then take on Congress’s failure to pass a budget throughout the recession, Romney’s own proposals that are seriously misguided at best, the comeback of GM etc. so he is still in danger, but there are paths to victory certainly and reelection isn’t a complete lost cause.

  • kowalski

    I see long lists of numbers, big tables of figures, electoral districts, a few big mathematical signs, several crossouts, a couple of large areas filled with “???” and a website address, with a photo of the candidate about 1/20th the size of the poster right there in the middle. In black and white and with a lot of Sharpie crossouts in several different colors.

    This was the Obama Campaign’s prime mover:

    http://resistthepop.wordpress.com/

    http://resistthepop.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/obama_hope_poster.jpeg

    It was an emotional appeal to artists right from the beginning and Karl Rove couldn’t *ever* pull that off, except maybe in disguise, as a totally different person.

  • throwback59

    or perhaps Axelrod had a flashback to 2008.

  • kowalski

    I’d still rather Karl Rove be on my side when I ask a question about such-and-such a district and where Whateverville resides in it in the middle of Whateverstate. He’s invaluable. You could fill the Jeopardy screen with electoral district questions and Rove would probably get every one of them right. But he’s never going to be “cool” or “hip”.

  • Christine

    I’d go with trolls…and very specifically, sheep trolls. They were sent here with a message. They can’t even vary from it when confronted. It’s like the seminar caller school graduate sketch you hear on Rush a lot (if you’re listening via the internet or 24/7). “This award is for flawlessly saying…”

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Meanwhile your elders will be trying to get this avowed Marxist who is destroying this nation out of office without your help child.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Romney is certainly not the weakest candidate we could have run. If he were he would not have negotiated every minefield and come through as the remaining candidate.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Axelrod gets his orders from his lord and master, NO, not Obama, who is just a stuffed suit. His real master is the person who has now taken control of the Chicago machine and in some ways the democratic party. Rahm, Sith Lord, Emmanuel.

  • kowalski

    nt.

  • westcoastpatriette

    and meant no offense. You are very creative by nature and make your posts interesting.

  • miconservative

    have we lost it completely here at RedState? Jeez. Come on people.

  • miconservative

    Erick using Irony and sarcasm and far too money people on RedState showing no comprehension of it. Lighten up people. Have fun with Axelrod’s screw up.

  • raginpatriot

    >>”Meanwhile your elders will be trying to get this avowed Marxist who is destroying this nation out of office without your help child.” – kyle8

    I’ll vote for the lesser of two evils in November, because Barry Soetoro Hussein Obama presents an existential threat.

    But “elder” know that this “child” knows what “fellow travelers” are, and Governor Romneycare (and gun control, abortion, global warming) is definitely a fellow traveler … or if you prefer, a Vichy collaborator with the progressive state that has been being incrementally erected since Woodrow Wilson won the Presidency 100 years ago.

    His inner circle (Norm Coleman) has already signaled no repeal of Obamacare — well, Romney was the beta-tester for it, so what should we expect? — and they’ve already signaled the Etch-A-Sketch shift back to the left.

    So this “child” stands by his informed conclusion that: “All we have is Certain Disaster(D) vs. Lesser of Two Evils (R).”

  • hayekwasright

    Unless you are reading body language. The clip gives no further context than the quote in the story. Readers would do well to pay attention to quotation marks. The story and the headline are just emphasizing the logical conclusion of Mr. Axelrod’s statement.

    Good article, my only complaint would be that the linked article could have given a little more context. But then, Axelrod might have clarified what he was really trying to say, and taken some of the entertainment value out of the story.

  • Xasteius

    Fairly straight forward.

  • kowalski

    And I’m probably a less “purely” Conservative than Erick but not by much, oddly enough. Redstate should be a fascinating place for people to read what people think, it should always be interesting, and I try to keep my end of the bargain up in terms of keeping it interesting because I really care about the people who started it and I agree with them (for the most part). I tick people off sometimes, but in terms of who I vote for, and what I support for this country, I’m on our side and I’m very conservative. Except every once in a while, and then I’m still really on our side but I think people need to understand something they’re missing. Everyone has blind spots.

    You can rest assured that I believe very wholeheartedly in the links in my sig. line. I believe in lower taxes, I believe in allowing American business to grow, and I believe in less regulation and red tape. I believe in American Exceptionalism and I believe very strongly that this country has been a force for Good in the world. I’m not the student of the Federalist Papers that Gingrich is, to be sure, but I know that the Constitution is our best and most essential guide for the future – because the future is unhinged and chaotic without it. It’s our anchor. We need the Constitution more than ever.

    I’m not running for public office nor do I plan to. I want to run a successful business here in America and employ people gainfully, treat them very well, and give them a reason to get up in the morning and believe they have a future.

  • kowalski

    And the question is:

    “What district did Weezer “perform” in on a Microsoft CD-ROM?”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kemivUKb4f4

    And I KNOW he knows the answer.

  • up2news

    If only Obama listened to common sense such as this we wouldn’t have the problems we do but alas he is a socialist. Need anyone say more?

  • up2news

    Romney has more experience?
    He’s not going to run a company – he will have to work with people in Washington and he hasn’t a clue as to how they think and sneak, etc.

    The only ones with a real work experience in Washington is Paul and Newt. Both know how to work the establishment. Washington insiders will have Romney for lunch. They don’t fear him – no need to.

    All the votes have not been counted – the GOP did not include them all so the count is wrong. don’t be misled by lies.

  • acat

    Rove is about the numbers, all the congressional races, where we’re strong, where we’re weak.

    Axelrod is about folding and polishing and manipulating Obama.

    Mew

  • kowalski

    Barack Obama as the President is not the worst President we’ve ever had. I’ll say that right now. We could have a lot less intelligent people, we could have total incompents.

    But he is almost singularly the most stage-managed and overproduced President in the history of this country, and that goes back a long, long time.

    If I had told people in 2002 that I thought Barack Obama was going to be the President before Hillary Clinton, people would have said: “Barack WHO?”

    This was a long effort, it’s a very carefully manufactured product and it always has been. And I have to take my hat off to David Axelrod and Penny Pritzker and everyone in Chicago who made it possible, because they pulled it off spectacularly.

    But that’s not a reason to reelect him.

  • ashland_avenue

    Nt

  • kowalski

    I still have a copy of the Chicago Reader portraying him alongside a dozen or so other candidates and basically nobody knew him. But everyone important knew him. It was an inside joke at the law school I worked for: “How is this guy who nobody knows going to become a U.S. Senator?”

    It was a fait accompli. And Biden as his VP was the least surprising thing in the world: Biden was chosen specifically to “shepherd” him through the U.S. Senate and keep him out of trouble, basically. “Voting Present” and showing up late for committee meetings wasn’t an accident even while Obama was a U.S. Senator.

  • http://www.ajharaldson.com lakeworthcane

    Axelrod has very clearly come out in support of Romney. I don’t know why you can’t see it.

  • kowalski

    He’s been so nondescript in his tenure thusfar as President that he can be completely recast in the next six months and believe me, he will be. He was and is the vessel into which the Presidency could be poured, and he’s going to be reshaped and transmogrified until November.

    Appealing to the Yoof didn’t work so well this time around? Well, he’ll appeal to the Seniors. You can remake Barack Obama into almost anything to keep him into office. We’re so far away from election day that I expect him to be a completely different person by the time we get there.

  • kowalski

    Sometimes you have to fight a shape shifter with a shape shifter. Someone equally as skilled at manipulating people.

  • http://www.ajharaldson.com lakeworthcane

    Look, Whothennow, you shouldn’t take this so hard. It’s not the worst thing in the world that Axelrod has obviously abandoned Obama and signed on with Romney.

    If it makes you feel any better, I’m sure that if David Axelrod had a son, he’d look like you.

    Wait a minute. You’re not Axelrod’s son, are you?

  • Flagstaff

    Even in the full clip, it isn’t until the final sentence that he says “the same failed policies that were so disastrous in the last decade.” Hmmm….

    Maybe he has jumped ship. I mean, the “last decade”? Three years of it were during the Obama administration, and they’ve been the worst. The decade before that was mostly run by the Democrats. Just what did he mean?

  • http://www.ajharaldson.com lakeworthcane

    With time, you will learn to accept that Axelrod has overcome his own disbelief, abandoned Obama and heartily endorse Romney.

    Don’t be ashamed. We’ve all had to go through this: astonished disbelief that Americans elected a door-to-door Electrolux salesman named after a flying donkey to the Presidency.

    Axelrod has finally worked through it. With time, you will to, and you will tearfully rejoice and join Axelrod on Romney’s side.

  • gekster

    Thanks for the laugh. :)

  • tecumsehtea

    n/t

  • kowalski

    I could. I don’t think he’s a crazy person. I think his wife is doing good things at least in terms of her messages about obesity and healthy eating. She’s trying to help people. His kids, I’m sure, are wonderful. He’s a center-left President with a Europeanist VP and he’s trying to move the country in the direction he was elected to move it in. He brought a lot of people into the government and tried to imbue them with the sense of seriousness it brings. He has never been an unserious man in office, I think. He’s made decisions and I think he’s gotten some bad advice.

    I think he’s been rash on a couple of occasions and I think he’s damaged himself more than anything else by being rash. The Fast and Furious thing and then this latest theatricality with the Florida case is really unnerving – and I have to think he knows it’s unnecessary and probably destructive. I can’t say for sure, though.

    But if I decided to tour the White House and I happened to meet him when he came to greet visitors unexpectedly would I scream and yell at him? Absolutely not. He’s still our President. Most of what he’s done are things I’ve expected him to do, except for things that I think are really, truthfully deeply unhelpful and even when I disagree with him (which I do almost every day) he’s still our President.

    I know he’s working hard and I respect him and I deeply respect the office he holds. He has his prerogatives and his views, and after all, he was elected, not me. I’m just not going to vote for him in this election cycle, and I’m going to do everything I can to make sure more people don’t vote for him, either.

    But I do have a core belief in his civility and I know I have a core belief in mine.

  • http://www.ajharaldson.com lakeworthcane

    I don’t want any more “experienced politicians” with all their age-old connections. I don’t want people who know how to “work the establishment.” I want people who will not set “the Washington establishment” politely aside but will hurl it with great force.

    If you think “Washington insiders” are going to get over on Romney, then you’re the one who’s mislead.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    from the road we’re on (Obama’s road).

    And I quote: “The choice in this election is between an economy that produces a growing middle class and that gives people a chance to get ahead and their kids a chance to get ahead, and an economy that continues down the road we’re on.”

    He appears to be expressing enthusiasm against the direction that Obama is taking.

  • cbartlett

    nt

  • barleycorn

    That Axelrod was stupid enough to frame his comment as he did or that several commenters up-thread are too obtuse to get the joke.

    I knew comedy was hard but I never realized it was THIS hard.

  • cbartlett

    Why on earth would Axlerod EVER endorse anyone other than BHO? Erick is being sarcastic – duh!

  • Remington_Steele

    irony and humor. Man, I haven’t laughed this hard or seen so many worthy of getting smacked for quite a while.

  • acat

    but you’re exactly right. We’re nominating two past masters of proxy-hitting dirty-tricks campaign school.

    This is going to get dirty. Fast.

    Mew

  • igotacomment

    “lakeworthcane”

    “If it makes you feel any better, I?m sure that if David Axelrod had a son, he?d look like you. Wait a minute. You?re not Axelrod?s son, are you?”
    —————-
    Hey, if was, I’d cut it off so I’d never reproduce! No, that’s not profanity … it’s the truth.

  • davesinsanantonio

    whether Obummer has Axelrod’s permission to say a thing.

    Axelrod has had to keep very busy trying to un-do some of the things Obummer has said.

  • tngal

    She is so great explaining what dems mean. Or maybe Biden. He has a knack for it as well.

    There’s a virus going around their camp, and they’ve all caught it.

    Thankfully, we are not going to have to spend a lot on creative ad writers this election. The ads have been written for us.

  • funwithknives

    but it ain’t much,’ r p’. TEA Partiers had the momentum and sat on their hands almost immediately after 11/2010. Burn-out or breathlessness, it all equals the same result.
    I’ve watched Libertarians, Constitutional Conservatives and TEAPers fail in the simplest of endevours: To get their stuff together and build a coalition that can’t be ignored. Surely there is commonality of interests but where is the outreach , and needed continuity?

    Just as in the Gun Scares of the ’90′s when various factions in the firearms community were divided into various sub-groups,(Hunters,self-protectionists,* assault rifles*, etc.) the various common interests fail to see that “a fist is always superior to an open hand”.Pro-gunners eventually got it more or less correct , but it came from zeroing in on deficiencies and correction.

    As long as Liberty Seekers, and Originalists stay divided, it gets no better. Doing what has always been done gets you to Here, and you consider This Set of circumstances a lost cause.
    Time for some Creative Destruction.

    I’ve been at this for a short while (1994,+/-) but collective backing off of your assigned group’s stated goals has always been a constant. Just as taking a hill over and over again in warfare is so absolutely soul-sucking, this scenario repeated again and again in my short experience has been seen and rarely mentioned,or acted on.

    Tell me I don’t have a point, ‘raginpatriot’. I’m right here and I listen.

  • funwithknives

    Dolt will ‘ learn anything’ useful or of real worth?{ …and I use ‘ Dolt’ in a positive fashion…} What he seems to think shameful, we embrace as parody or “… losing sight of David’s real intent…”.
    Either way, the gent is a marroon, big time. He proves it by his so-called writing and is a fine example of Progressive thought processes.
    I thank him for the tutorial. E N C O R E !!!

    As far as him learning anything: Mister, you’re a better man than I……..

  • cbartlett

    and mostly valuable to our side. But I think you may underestimate his influence. I rather resented his constant appearances on Fox shoving Romney down our throats from very early in the process – he was the first to define “inevitable” to the masses. His knowledge and experience with election number crunching are very respected by most people. But I observed him “taking sides” in the early stages of the primary process, sometimes just by repeatedly ignoring certain candidates – most especially Perry, whom he and Bushes do not like. (Fox News obviously agreed and supported the pro-Romney mantra too.) I took just enough statistics in college to figure out that almost any statistic can be manipulated to show almost anything you want. You can emphasize certain parameters, or carefully word the questions in a survey, or limit your sample size, or a hundred other things to manipulate the results to sway people into thinking exactly what what you want them to think. Uninformed people who do not know what to look for “behind” the statistics, just fall in line. (By the way, liberals are masters at doing this…) I think Karl is very, very smart and knows exactly how to manipulate things to favor the GOP Establishment view of all issues and candidates. I guess that’s fine as long as he sticks with the conservative side of things and doesn’t get too far off the reservation. I definitely want him on our side and not Obama’s but I always keep one eye open when listening to Rove.