« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

A Nobody With No Audience Gets Noticed by Mitch McConnell

Yesterday on Laura Ingraham’s radio show, she asked Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell about a recent Roll Call article that framed me as one of the loud leaders of conservatives opposed to Mitch McConnell. The Senator from Kentucky responded that he had never heard of me and I did not have an audience.

That sounds a bit like the child, when asked if he ate the cookie, replying that he had not and besides it did not taste good. If he’d never heard of me, how can he comment on my audience? If he states plainly I have no audience, how can he claim to not have heard of me? His remarks also came less than a day after I came out publicly against bronies, the adult male fans of My Little Pony. I hope that’s just a coincidence.

Mitch McConnell’s remark is just another example of him being vastly overrated as both a strategist and tactician. He claims to have advanced the conservative cause, but told Laura he has to be mindful that to govern Republicans must reach out to all Americans. Perhaps that is why in 2010, with the rise of the tea party, Mitch McConnell backed Arlen Specter against Pat Toomey, Charlie Crist against Marco Rubio (McConnell staffers went to Florida to help Crist), Robert Bennett against Mike Lee, and Trey Grayson against Rand Paul.

I grew up thinking Mitch McConnell was a right wing warrior. It turns out he’s just a typical Washingtonian appropriator who has presided over a massive expansion of the welfare state doing not much more than issuing bold platitudes as he cuts deals to expand government spending and along the way made some major tactical and strategic blunders that groups like ACORN were able to thrive.

Let’s review the record.

In the 1990′s Mitch McConnell, then the Republican manager against the Motor Voter bill, made the brilliant tactical decision to not filibuster the motion to take up the bill. Consequently it passed. ACORN and other left-wing groups were emboldened to do what they’ve done over the past two decades. Yes, people forget that it was Mitch McConnell’s tactical decision to let Motor Voter get to the floor of the Senate despite the warnings of what would happen. Passage of that law made it ever easier to engage in voter registration fraud. McConnell had the votes to stop it from being considered, but once it got to the floor of the Senate everyone knew there were enough wobbly Republicans who would not dare go on record actually opposing it on passage.

In the early 2000′s when McCain-Feingold went through the Senate, McConnell yet again cut out the legs of its opponents telling them not to worry because he’d let the Supreme Court do their dirty work for them and kill it. McConnell lost in the Supreme Court.

Mitch McConnell’s more recent record makes clear he is more interested in being Majority Leader than advancing any sort of conservative principles. It’s all about McConnell.

He is an appropriations cardinal in the Senate who has routinely stymied fiscal conservative efforts to rein in spending by Senators Coburn, DeMint, and even John McCain.

Recall, if you will, Senator McConnell didn’t just vote for the Wall Street bailouts, he rescued it from near defeat by adding earmarks to TARP after it failed in the House.

As I mentioned, in 2010 Mitch McConnell backed Arlen Specter against Pat Toomey, Charlie Crist against Marco Rubio, Robert Bennett against Mike Lee, and Trey Grayson against Rand Paul.

After House GOP made a stand on payroll tax this past winter, McConnell pulled the rug out and cut a deal with Harry Reid that paid for a payroll tax cut with increases to home mortgages. Allen West said he felt betrayed over this.

McConnell personally recruited Senator Roy Blunt to stop conservative Ron Johnson from winning a key leadership spot.

McConnell vowed to block conservatives from forcing votes on full repeal of Obamacare this year, then flipped and said he’d force votes in March when RepealIt.org threatened to run ads for him to resign, He has yet to keep his promise to force votes. McConnell’s loyal lieutenants in the Senate, at the time, explained that forcing full repeal votes on the Democrats would undermine their ability to cut deals with Harry Reid.

Senator McConnell just last week voted with Senate Democrats on the Senate Appropriations Committee against Paul Ryan’s budget spending levels. Last year McConnell refused to whip support for Ryan’s budget when it came up for a vote in the Senate.

Senator McConnell and his allies frequently say he has to do what he does because they must keep the moderates to be in the majority. Except 2010 gives the lie away. In races conservatives absolutely could win, McConnell sided with the moderates. Behind the scenes, on issues like Obamacare that remain hugely unpopular with the American people, McConnell cuts deals with the Democrats instead of forcing votes.

McConnell is emblematic of all that is wrong with Washington, D.C. He covets power relentlessly and only acts when it is threatened, then only doing so much as to stop the threat without actually leading. Along the way, he has been deeply complicit in putting our Republican in a position of bankruptcy.

I may be a nobody with no audience, but Mitch McConnell is a leader with no spine to lead.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    nt

  • davesinsanantonio

    I don’t think there is a worse person on our side of the aisle who could be a worse “leader”. But, he doesn’t even lead. He just hides in the bushes and shoots you in the back.

  • fpete13527

    ….and McConnell will do everything possible to make upcoming legislation and upcoming candidate recommendations be as progressively “moderate / liberal / weak” as possible…..as his pitiful record shows again and again and again and again.

    McConnell needs to be gone from leadership yesterday.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …based on direct-observation.

    Disclaimer: Pat Toomey was one of the two people for whom I’d maxed-out…the other being Mike Fitzpatrick..because I felt I’d feel guilty if they’d lost and I’d hadn’t. Both “investments” have been corroborated, Pat in the Senate and Mike in the House.

    So I attended a luncheon in Philly [@ the Union League] for $$$-supporters honoring Pat, @ which MM spoke, and I spoke with him briefly @ the evening swearing-in party for Pat [in D.C.].

    I will offer memory-traces of both, briefly, with the goal being to assess how it may be possible to articulate how he will interact with Romney during the rest of 2012.

    *

    He is more of a physically “slight” individual than he appears to be on TV/Cable, but his quiet voice is a “constant” in both venues. He flat-out predicted that Grayson would lose if nominated, and he did not allude to any prior support for Pat’s prior opponents. Otherwise, the discussion @ the luncheon was issues-oriented [he corroborated everything we feared about BHO] and the aside @ the dinner was merely “heard” [I expressed alarm about Congressional inaction regarding Iran as he ran to the elevator].

    He listened quietly as a colleague [Guzzardi] and I proceeded to trash the Philly-GOP [challenging its chair and its attorney to defend themselves against maintaining a defeatist attitude, allegedly, so that they could maintain patronage @ the Parking Authority]. He listened quietly as most of those who were assembled lionized Pat [simply noting the necessity to undermine a currently-triumphant POTUS]. He listened quietly as the two-dozen people around the rectangular-table articulated their pet-concerns.

    There was nothing fiery, nothing presaging “we must do everything in the Senate to defeat BHO in 2012, nothing deeply philosophical. On the one hand, he was setting the tone; on the other hand, he chose not to amplify the emotion. Perhaps this reflected Pat’s methodical approach, but it also conveyed the mindset of a tactician, knowingly pulled in myriad directions.

    *

    When BHO pushed student-loan relief, the reflex-reaction of the GOP [both Romney and Congress] was oriented towards ameliorating this [and any other] effort to monopolize a campaign-issue. Nothing is to be conceded, everything is to be reframed [such as "fairness"] within Republican contexts, and the narrative will be seized-back whenever the D’s attempt to create a beachhead.

    This observation is corroborated while monitoring MSNBC, for the “fairness” speech has been conveyed [to the mindless] as merely reinforcing the arrogance of the “Haves” over most-everybody in their listening-audience. These were “top-of-the-program” presentations by Matthews, Sharpton and Schultz…I didn’t check-out O’Donnell or Maddow, other than to note the reflex-sarcasm of the latter about the ex-candidate minuet, Santorum’s non-endorsement and The Newt’s belated-endorsement.

    This overall approach, in all probability, will be methodically maintained…regardless of whatever protestations may emerge [on a given issue] from those who are to the “right” and, thus, adopting a dismissive attitude towards the RS-leader is not surprising; EE has annoyed people @ times [remember, he still hasn't revealed what happened in January pre-withdrawal, while many were clamoring for Perry to be supported], but he is obviously viewed externally as an independent and articulate voice-of-reason when D.C. trench-warfare is strategized.

    *

    To summarize: Note how quickly the RNC turned-around the “slow -jam” musical/news presentation of BHO on Fallon, simply by juxtaposing the serious-excerpts from Romney. Just as MM [and other GOP Congressional leaders] focused on student-loans [vide supra], one can anticipate that perceived-friction between the more doctrinaire individuals who populate RS and those who are marketing themselves to attract “moderate/independent” voters [plus make inroads into traditional D-demographics, such as women, youth and Hispanics] will actually be highlighted as a campaign subtext…just as Kucinich provided dependable-polarity to allow BHO to appear “compromising.”

    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/Decoder-Wire/2012/0424/Obama-slow-jams-the-news-with-Jimmy-Fallon.-How-does-that-work-video

    As Blue-Dog D’s are displaced [as occurred in PA] and as people such as Toomey are elected, the political polarity that will emerge will undoubtedly provide the stage for the players to act-out his/her part.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_the_world%27s_a_stage

    This is not to conclude that they [MM & Romney, et al.] will be immune to the input/oversight @ RS, but it is to recommend that truthteller-journalists must not feel ignored as the “experts” home-in on doing everything possible to save America, starting on 1/20/2013.

  • philhoganjr

    The fish rots from the head.

  • bobvious

    he doesn’t cry! What, wait you want more?!

    when is this guy’s primary?

  • snappy101

    So, if no McConnell, who is next in line for the job? Just want to be sure if he ousted from the leadership role, the next guy in line isn’t worse. Is it Jon Kyl?

  • tokm908

    Where was McConnell when Obama made his non-recess recess appointments? Obama bluntly violates Senate rules and The Constitution and McConnell sits idly by. Ironically its Rand Paul who is bringing a legal suit against these illegal appointments.

    Where was McConnell when Harry Reid changed the filibuster rules? In a display of ‘leadership’ he made a floor speech then let it happen. That seems to be the rule of thumb for McConnell. He makes a floor speech, then lets the Democrats ride right over him.

    As the Senate Minority Leader he should be our LOUDEST voice in The Senate. Does he advocate for our causes more than Rand Paul? Jim DeMint? Pat Toomey? Marco Rubio? Jeff Sessions? Mike Lee? Even John McCain? McConnell more often advocates against us. When we take The Senate later this year we need to keep all this in mind when the Majority Leader is choosen. Its NOT McConnell’s ‘turn’, and as far as I’m concerned it will never be McConnell’s turn.

  • tokm908

    John Kyl is retiring.

  • http://haakondahl.com/blog haakondahl

    “Congratulations, Speaker Boehner. Well done, Leader McConnell. You have radicalized a significant percentage of your base against you. You have lied to us, denounced us, and worked against us. You will no longer have our support. Good ideas and legislation which makes sense will always deserve support, and will have it. But you have severed your connection with these things. If I support you now, it is because you are carrying a football in the proper direction. You?re still not getting your contract renewed.”

  • PatriotForLiberty

    Mitch has been there for 25 YEARS and his job is to know who influential leaders like Erick are, I think he knows darn well and just lied like he always does.

    Poster boy for TERM LIMITS and INCOMPETENCE. We keep talking about how awful he is and he keeps collecting millions. What’s a real plan to get rid of this jerk? Can Human Events and other properties help call him out on these lies?

  • macwell

    is due to bite the dust
    This is why I’ve been shouting for the last year that we the people MUST remove all career politicians from our Congress.
    Congress was never intended to be anyone’s career.

  • macwell

    Bad men cannot make good citizens. Too many bad men are filling the halls of OUR Congress.
    We the people must rid America of the very idea of a career in politics.
    The House of Representatives was intended to be filled with a cross section of Americans, people from all walks of life.

    A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience are incompatible with freedom.

    The left has been corrupting the morals of Americans with their Books, TV shows, and movies for the past 50 years. Free sex, free love free everything. Many young people have been brainwashed into believing that if it feels good, do it.

    We the people must remove all the people who believe that America needs to be “fundamentally transformed”.

    Then, we must begin to remove the career politicians from our Congress.
    We must also begin to remove most of the lawyers in Congress. It’s because of the lawyers that we get 2000+ page bills that “we have to pass in order to find out what’s in the bill”.

    NO MORE LAWYERS

    We MUST take back OUR Congress.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    The constant cutting of deals, Deals in which Democrats are never expected to live up to their side of the bargain!

    We really would have been much better off if his seat had been held by a democrat.

    He is just another earmarking, spending, lying politician.

  • tnguy

    We can push him to the right. We’ll hold his feet to the fire. Keep him in check. And a bunch of other Romney cliches I can’t recall…..

  • liveforadrenaline

    McConnell and Boehner MUST go.

    I don’t know who is gonna step forward yet in Washington to help throw both out on their keister, but someone needs to.

    I’ve been saying for years that they are both proverbial groundhogs. They live in a hole 99% of the time and then every once in a while they pop up and say a few things and then go back into their hole and do nothing for Republicans, let alone conservatives.

    Don’t we have ANYONE back there who knows how to lead the troops into battle against the left?

  • mirac777

    Maybe now he will know who you/we are lol.

  • Ausonius

    Is it really as simple as a group dynamic? High-school style peer pressure?

    If so, when Republicans had a majority in Congress, why did they turn into Dems? Fear of the bureaucrats?

    A psychologist should do a study.

    I suspect a cure might found in something called “Primaries” to find people IMMUNE to D.C.-itis, but that this may take years of grass-roots effort!

  • http://www.nucre8ion.org nucre8ion

    “I grew up thinking Mitch McConnell was a right wing warrior.”
    Warriors actually CUT things not make deals.

  • acat

    of the idea that all powers not enumerated to the Fed belong to the States, i.e. a stronger assertion of the 10th Amendment.

    I’m optimistic that the pendulum has started to swing in that direction, based on the epic fail that has been the Obama administration defense of Obamacare and their lawsuit against Arizona.

    It took a century for the pendulum to get this far .. it’s not going to get all the way back in what remains of my lifetime, but my hypothetical grandkids may be better off for it.

    Mew

  • acat

    How much harm has former Speaker Pelosi done recently, eh?

    McConnell isn’t up for re-election yet, and finding a challenger may be difficult, so we’re stuck with him as a Senator.

    That said, there are over a dozen opportunities to send Conservatives to the Senate this year, and a number of actual conservatives who could take up the majority leader gavel… if we elect enough Conservatives, Mitch could get a demotion.

    As for Boehner, we need to keep the pressure on in the same way.

    Mew

  • daveinthed

    What a back-stabbing JERK. Get out, McConnell, because you are an embarassment and an anchor on the conservative cause, despite your RHETORIC to the contrary. You are one of the WORST offenders as far as conservative Republicans who have PARTICIPATED in the vast expansion of the federal government.

    He needs to HIT THE BRICKs, sooner rather than latger, so that we can usher in some more ACTUAL conservatives…not just lip-service providers like this phony.

  • acat

    At one point, McConnell may have been a conservative…. but he’s long past his sell-by, at least as majority leader.

    Time for him to go back to chairing a committee or something.

    Mew

  • acat

    Mew

  • rayhinkle

    I am always amazed at the reaction that we have of the senate by current commentary. The Senate is elected by popular voting in each state. Our founders knew that to offset populism and to protect the Republic and States rights, that the election of the senate should be by the legislatures of each state. When this changed due to the Progressive movement and Constitutional amendment, it changed how the senate functioned and its relationship with the House. This has created 100 mini-presidents each trying to be noticed on the national stage. Maybe we should return to the way these Senators are elected as originally outlined by the Founders. I believe that much of this nonsense would be diminished. Check out Dr. I.W. Parkins website http://www.americanpoliticalcommentary.com/ on his idea of increasing the number of elected representatives in the house. This is a good first step in making our government more responsive.

  • ihateliberals

    These two alleged leaders are the worse the Republicans have had in recent memory and I have been around since the Eisenhower days. In the Senate McConnell, McCain and the likes should just go ahead and move their seats over to the other side of the isle. No wonder the Democrats like these guys they are on their side. I have been a conservative all my life and i am still baffled at what has happened to conservatives. It’s like we went to sleep one day and when we woke-up we found that we were still asleep. Even with the Tea Party movement we are still in the background. McConnell and Boehner beat the Tea Party down and they never knew what hit them. I thought they would fight back but instead they caved to Boehner and McConnell. I wish I knew what to do to arouse the conservatives again. we need to rally and get back into the game. instead I see the GOP still beating the Hell out of us and we are just lying there taking it. Now we are stuck with the choice of two Liberals for President. we either have a very left-wing Democrat or a left-wing Republican. The Republican is the scary one because we don’t know what he will do. With the left-wing Democrat we do know what his plans are and that is why we will still prefer the left-wing Republican.

  • Allegator_Baby

    Just another reason for TERM LIMITS!!

  • chrismcmac

    Is there a Super PAC or some group working to defeat Mitch from a leadership position? Who can we donate to?

  • liveforadrenaline

    Not sure you understand how the House and the Senate work.

    Sending conservatives to Washington does little, if they are obstructed by Boehner and McConnell.

    Those guys determine who becomes Committee Chairmen, and no legislation gets to the floor except through both of them.

    Right now, there are no conservatives as Committee Chairmen in either the House or the Senate. Not Jim DeMint, not Michele Bachmann, not Allen West… not a single person that I know of other than perhaps Issa, who has no say in Appropriations.

    If those guys can’t get power, then there is little hope of conservatives gaining power until a full-scale revolt takes place.

    As of now, no one has stepped up to the plate to lead this revolt.

  • rabun1016

    He is a big part of the problem

  • http://www.democratsforsale.blogspot.com soonermom

    I am so happy to see this article about McConnell after what we are seeing with group of establishment Republicans starting with their backing of Lugar the moderate in Indiana — cannot even vote in IN according to the election board, in NE where Stienberg is the obvious choice over the candidate of the Republican establishment, Cruz in TX over Dewhurst, and Hatch not being able to win the primary in Utah show that McConnell and the establishment Republicans are trying to keep more conservatives from being elected to the Senate.

    When Trent Lott (cannot stand) made the comment that when they get new candidates to the Senate they basically have to brainwash them to forget about ‘limited’ government, I went through the roof/

    We are in a fight for the soul of the Republican Party — on one side is the Bush 41 group with their puppetmaster Karl Rove who shoved Romney down our throats with the dirtiest primary I have ever witnessed in the Republican Party. Scorched earth was more like a Democrat campaign or a hostile takeover of the Republican Party. Not satisfied with getting their candidate for President they are now branching out with Crossroads leading to get establishment types elected to the House and Senate.

    What McConnell and the rest of the establishment types don’t realize is that the people who work the campaigns are not going to roll over and play dead. If they want to shove out conservatives after this election or even before because we won’t be lemmings, then they can shove it as far as I am concerned. Good luck finding suckers to work campaigns because the blue bloods of the Republican Party are not about to get their hands dirty.

    Never in my life until this year given any credence to the thought of a third party but the idea is getting more appealing after the joke budgets Republicans are doing when you find out the cuts being touted do little to cut the deficit. It seems to be one big charade in DC on the part of the people like McConnell who want everyone to fall in line with what they want and don’t make waves.

  • rabun1016

    Without term limits, we end up with a de facto seniority system worse than the Teamsters.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    the prediction was that rand paul would lose if nominated for senator

  • acat

    They are elected to leadership positions *by their fellow senators and representatives*.

    Replace enough of their peers, and they go down.

    Replacing McConnell just means the next-in-line squish gets the gavel. Replacing enough Senators with Conservatives means McConnell’s cabal (including Murkowski, by the way) goes down.

    Mew

  • clintonformccain

    Which means not much of an audience. :)

  • metairiemike

    How about for starters, he can win ………….?
    (Rassmussen 25 April: Romney 49-obama 45)

  • powertothepeople

    it is the job of the voters to fire people. If voters are too stupid to do so, their problem.

  • drsheilahere

    If ever there was an argument to be made for weeding out the herd, it is now. No one should have a lifetime on the Hill. We NEED TERM LIMITS, NOW.

    They are so entrenched and corrupt at this point, they can’t see how destructive they are. Pelosi, Reid, Schumer et.al. Way too long.

    And, judges should not sit forever either.

    Romney has to win. Changes have to be made. Government needs to come down to earth. Housing market fell again.
    www.drsheilaherenow.net

  • powertothepeople

    it is the job of the people to vote people out, not some regulation. If they are too stupid to fire a person in need of being fired, then they get to live with it.

    2 years or 50 years, no one is so entrenched that they can not be voted out at the voting booth.

    And judges should sit lifetime since in theory it is the only way to keep as much politics out of their decisions as possible.

  • tsturbo

    Mitt Romney is Mitch McConnell’s guy. The only chance we have to change course in any meaningful way is to force Romney to commit to a leadership change in Congress. Make to mistake, the Republican fix is in, and WE THE PEOPLE are the only hope OUR country has!

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …which appears not to have provoked much reaction.

    The tenor on RS is that MM should be displaced.

    I noted his strong-error [downplaying Rand Paul] and I noted is genteel-approach [downplaying the Iranian threat].

    I also noted how it seems he is interacting with his future-POTUS.

    *

    That level of coordination, if it proves successful, will be more apt to serve as a harbinger of 2013+ than expressed-concerns with his approach to ignoring true-conservatives [which has also characterized Romney's approach to the TEA Party Movement].

    As the latter now tries to mop-up the latter [having appeared @ the Franklin Institute on 4/16/2012], one can anticipate the former will gingerly follow [witness Toomey's having served on last year's super-committee].

    Finally, I noted how MM and Romney [if indeed in-tune with each other] will attempt to fashion a campaign which targets strategically…and how the immediate reaction [as gauged on PMSNBC] would best be characterized as “consternation.”

    *

    That is why I concluded that it would be wise to continue to exert public-pressure and electoral-efforts because, quoting acat, “If we elect enough Conservatives, Mitch could get a demotion.” But don’t be surprised if–assuming we emerge victorious in both realms–MM remains in his position…for reasons aforementioned.

    The bottom-line of all bottom-lines, here and elsewhere, may be the prospect that–by picking key-battles and down-playing personality-conflicts and suppressing-ego–the GOP will displace BHO and the USA will have been rescued in the process. I do not like MM attacking EE but, candidly, we must transcend this “slight” and confront the large-picture, as they say.

    Quite frankly, regardless of what criterion is chosen [domestic policy, foreign policy, social policy], America must be helped to understand her proximity to the abyss c/o BHO and the trenchant need to be rescued therefrom…in 2012!

  • acat

    Makes it much harder for the newly elected Rep or Senator (or POTUS) to clean house because the bureaucrats know they can just wait for term limits to kick in.

    Mew

  • jdw4america

    Can you imagine the conversation?

    “Erickson???? I hate that bas…I mean, who?”

    Mitch probably needed a blood pressure check after holding in the stream of profanity he sooo wanted to unleash on you Erick! But of course, first he’d have to admit that he’s scared of you and of your tiny little audience.

  • discisit

    Well said “soonermom”. I’ve often felt like you do.
    The likes of Republicans like McConnell need to be revealed to the conservative electorate.
    The Eriksons of the world need to name names and provide us with specifics. – great job Erik. Guys like Erikson need to flood the media and keep writing and showing up. People like me want the truth about what is going on so we can pass it along.
    There is a lot of work that can be done within the party to clean out the “moderates” without starting third party rumblings. In essence we could stir things up within the party if we take advantage of the proper timing and election cycle.
    This is why we need an articulate, persuasive communicator like Reagan head our party and use the bully pulpit of the POTUS to inform and lead and to put pressure on the Rinos in office. I will support Romney but I can only hope he will use his corporate executive experience to “influence” the leadership in congress.

  • liveforadrenaline

    But in spite of electing 87 freshmen to Congress, it wasn’t enough to override the power of the Speaker. This will repeat in the Senate.

    What it will take is a leader willing to step up to run the revolt. So far, no one in sight.

  • Locked and Loaded

    *nt – Now, telecast!

  • Ausonius

    Nobody votes for a bureaucrat: and from what I can tell, those are 2 million votes for making government bigger and more expensive, i.e. votes for Democrats.

    Reasserting the Tenth Amendment is one step: cutting the funding and therefore cutting the size of our unelected snowball-rolling-down-a-hill bureaucracy must be a second step. Bureaucrats will be doing everything possible to stop any such flow of power back to the states for obvious reasons.

  • acat

    The “cut off the food and the cancer dies” metaphor is about right.

    Mew

  • streiff

    they are called elections. In my view, term limits is a whiner’s argument.

  • streiff

    right? There is no way a president is going to get involved in a leadership coup in either the House or Senate.

  • acat

    favors Conservatives.

    Look at recent successes in Pennsylvania and Virginia on the fight against Abortion.

    Local Local Local

    Mew

  • renl57

    …then it’s even more imperative that we have a fighting Senate Majority Leader.

    I want somebody in there who will really make Obama’s life miserable, not someone who will “go along to get along.”

    If Obama wins a second term, our best fallback position is a House Speaker and Senate Majority Leader who will effectively castrate Obama, and leave him unable to accomplish ANY more of his left-wing agenda.

  • Viet71

    n/t

  • pbeck

    My wife and I were watching the senators gathered around a mic with Sen. Kyle talking about the dems holding a hearing re the AZ case the SCOTUS was to hear the following day when she asked me who the sourpuss was next to Kyle. I said it was the KY senator Mitch McConnell.
    My wife’s response….”You put a wig on that guy and you’ve got a Monty Python charactor.”

    “Come see the violence inherent in the system!…Help! I’m being repressed!”

  • clintonformccain

    …on beating Barack Obama in November.

    I’d rather see Republicans focus more effort on getting rid of Harry Reid than Mitch McConnell.

    Sometimes it’s easy to lose sight of the big picture.

  • streiff

    in terms of how the government functions we’ve come away with problems much larger than existed.

    The popular election of senators and term limiting the president were monumentally bad ideas.

  • colonelflagg

    Now if only more primary voters had realized that Romney is no better than McConnell, we might actually have someone worth cheering for in November.

  • Viet71

    Which has turned the Senate into a useless club run by lobbyists.

    An doubters can go ask Jack Abramoff (sp?).

  • Ausonius

    I think that one of the big problems as to why “our” politicians cave in so quickly to efforts to cut or eliminate programs is that they hear the government workers’ unions – who I can guarantee you will be joined by the money and power and advertising of every other union – threatening them with massive media campaigns full of lies and half truths.

    Such was the case here in Ohio last November, where Governor Kasich tried to prevent a law from being overturned which had tried to limit the power of unionized state-government workers (a la Wisconsin).

    A massive and relentless media campaign of misinformation brought the unions victory. Kasich’s supporters did not have the money, or were unwilling to spend it, and so he began getting nervous in the summer and was offering compromises and negotiations, at which the unions laughed.

    Thus it takes a politician who is willing to be a one-termer perhaps to fight the bureaucrats. And it takes a politician who will attack the power of the bureaucrats – every day in the media – just as relelntlessly as they will attack the politician.

  • gwbramhall

    You make some valid points against Mitch McConnell. He’s
    a leftover from the days when our Senators had no say unless
    the managed to work with the Democrats and hopefully mold
    their dangerous proposals into something less onerous. That
    way of proceeding is no longer acceptable and you are right
    to call him out on it and I’m surprised that Ingrim seemed to
    give him a pass. Still, if you are to be taken seriously, you got
    to re read your posts or have someone do it for you before you
    hit the post key. Your “complicit in putting our Republican in a
    position of bankruptcy.” was just the last straw for me and I
    had to comment. First there was ” that to govern Republicans
    must reach” how about a comma after Republicans? Or is he
    wanting to govern the GOP? Next “decision to not filibuster ”
    Don’t you think decision not to filibuster not only reads better
    but is gramatically correct? If you want to be taken more seriously,
    you might be more serious about how you write.

  • texasref

    The MAJORITY of Republicans in the Senate know all of the facts Erickson pointed out, yet they still voted for him.

    The only way to get rid of McConnell is the hard way: get involved at the precinct level to facilitate the placement of conservative, anti-establishment candidates on our primary ballots. Candidates who come to the table with money, or at least supporters with money, can step to the front of the line (for example, Senator Ron Johnson).

    With perseverance and patience, we can slowly but surely change the culture in the Congress by primarying the people who have repeatedly voted for McConnell and Boehner. The leaders are just responding to their perceived mandate; the real problem lies with the pro-establishment conference majorities who elected them.

    Precinct participation. Primaries.

  • acat

    got co-opted by the establishment?

    Your approach just cuts the head off – it doesn’t address the problem.

    It’s still worth doing – McConnell especially needs a challenge – but it’s not a cure. We’d be saying the same thing about whoever is elected majority leader following McConnell ..

    Please also keep in mind that changing the Senate is a decade-long process .. we only elect 1/3 of ‘em every 2 years.

    Mew

  • acat

    but I suspect that if he’d been slightly more clever, he could have splintered and destroyed his opposition by exempting the cops and firefighters.

    Look at how Gov. Walker has approached the issue, eh?

    Mew

  • texasref

    I believe in letting the electorate decide who is doing well enough to keep and who is not, even if they screw it up on occasion (achem, Kentucky!)

  • texasref

    Erick is a lawyer.

    I prefer to identify the scoundrels and the heroes in Congress by their records of voting and leadership.

  • texasref

    then you’re going to LOVE the deals coming over the next 8 years in the Romney Administration!

    Your comment is hyperbole. Of couse a compromising conservative is better than a hardcore liberal, which is what the average Democrat is, these days. But we can and should try to do better. We tried and failed in the presidential primaries. We still have opportunities in the Congress.

  • joecollins

    He stands for reelection in 2014.

    Our goal for 2012 is to elect enough Senate Conservatives to vote for someone other than him, and then to focus on funding a solid primary alternative for 2014.

  • johninohio

    McConnell knows about Rush Limbaugh because he has a large radio audience, and because of that, Rush Limbaugh is talked about in his circles. So, he has never had to listened to Limbaugh’s show to know he is a somebody.

    Not that I think you’re nobody, I read you all the time. I guess you’ll just have to get a radio show that’s syndicated all over the US.

  • clintonformccain

    I don’t think you get to be a committee chair by saying that 50 of your collegues across the aisle are card carrying members of the Communist party or by ranting about immunization and “young girls”.

    To gain more positions of power, conservatives need to offer candidates who have earned leadership positions. For example, I would count Paul Ryan as a fiscal conservative who has earned a leadership position.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    I dont think I could stand Clinton’s fifth term in office.
    (or his 4th, or 3rd, or 2nd…)

    Term limited President means we cut short the Hugo Chavez or Putin syndrome.

    And if you dont think American politicians dont have that, consider Aaron Burr, or FDR … or Clinton, who I am surfe you’d have to get him out with a crowbar had he not been term limited.

  • Ned Reck

    I knew about Erick Erickson… long before I ever knew about Laura Ingraham.

    Ned

  • Ausonius

    Such people are not b u r e a u c r a t s !!!!

    While their benefits and such may also be out of control, average voters are willing to give them more of a break because their lives can be on the line daily, as opposed to the assistant secretary to the deputy assistant director to the director of the bureau of junior-high oversight in the department of education.

  • ihateliberals

    In your third sentence you use the word “the” when it should be “they”. Be careful of the stones you throw while in a glass house.

  • UpLateAgain

    In the Fall of ’09, the Tea Party movement was on the rise. It was making headway, but had not yet attained the level of influence that would eventually significantly impact the 2010 elections. I was not at that time little more than cursorily aware of Mitch McConnell, who is not from my state.

    McConnell was on Hannity, and the discussion was about how much the Tea Party movement would be likely to influence Republican politics in the future, with Hannity showing videos of rallies taking place across the country and commenting that the major thrust of the Tea Party seemed to be bringing a halt to Congress and the president’s profligate spending….. including significant Tea Party criticism of earmarks.

    In his closing statement, McConnell looked directly into the camera as it zoomed in on his face and said, “Tea Party… We hear you.”

    The VERY next day, he voted for yet another set of earmarks in the tens of millions, and attached them to the military appropriations bill funding the war in Iraq.

    McConnell was known as one of the largest earmarks offenders in the Senate, and argued vehemently against their ban until overwhelmed.

    My main beef with him was not his opposition to banning earmarks (I happen to think they should have been banned, but that’s a topic for another discussion), it was his blatant lie directly into the camera that he ‘heard’ the Tea Party Movement’s admonishments…. given with utmost sincerity….. just the day before totally disregarding them. He clearly is nothing more than another politician who will say what he thinks people want to hear, and then do what he thinks is good for Mitch McConnell.

    EXACTLY the kind of politician, whatever the party, we need to be rid of at the earliest possibility.

    I’ve not trusted him in the slightest ever since.

  • ihateliberals

    They are Liberal Republicans just like McConnell.

  • texasref

    Like you said, look at the successes in Virginia and Pennsylvania. We would need those states to reach the magic number 34.

    We can bypass the do-nothing Congress entirely if we can get 34 state legislatures to require (“shall”) “Congress to call a convention for proposing amendments” and convince just four more states to agree when the convention votes.

    Even a compromise amendment restricting abortion solely to first trimester, non-surgical (pill) methods would be a giant improvement over the status quo, saving millions of innocent lives.

    We should focus on the state legislatures and pass a Human Life Amendment. This would be more productive than trying to rely on eight years of President Romney to influence the Supreme Court. We cannot expect a President Romney to be different than Governor Romney, who “appointed 36 judges during his tenure as governor of Massachusetts, and 27 of them were liberal Democrats.”*

    *Bryan Fischer, February 6, 2012
    http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/120206

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    You’re exactly right, we should be making a list of Republicans to primary especially in Red States. I mean honestly Scott Brown is probably the best you can expect from Mass but Alexander in Ten or McConnell in Kentucky? As a fiscal conservative, everytime the Senate votes on spending I feel like I got hit by a bus, look up expecting it to have Nevada plates and I’m shocked to see the old bus has Kentucky plates, I’m just saying.

  • texasref

    LOL

    Conservatives = Charlie Brown

    Congressional Leadership and the Spineless Tea Party-Turned-Establishment Class of 2010 = Lucy

    Newt Gingrich = The Little Red-Headed Girl who we as Charlie Brown want but can’t ever have

    Mitt Romney = WAH-WAHMP WAH WAH WAHMP (adult)

  • ihateliberals

    This is one area the founding fthers failed in. Congress as well as the POTUS should have term limits. The POTUS should be 6 years and then he’s out. senators should be 8 years and then they are out. Representatives should be 5 years and they are out. No second terms for any of them until at least two election cycles then they could run again. . There are more than enough people to run for office and this way the political machines end. no more of the Byrd type political machines that kept him in office regardless of what the people wanted. Allowing these people to become career politicians was a huge mistake.

  • rightlane1111

    The next in line..who…would that be as far as McConnell?

    If I could pick…it would be Tom Coburn or convince DeMint to stay.

  • streiff

    but unless you term limit congressional staff all you do by this nonsense is increase the power of staff as they are the only institutional knowledge.

    If people don’t like a senator or representative they can vote them out. The reason they are reelected is because they are popular.

  • acat

    Erick’s alluded to it before…

    Look at what happened to the Dems when Thune (R) replaced then-majority leader Daschle (D) … the Dems picked someone equally bad.

    What will happen if we *just* replace McConnell will be similar .. we’ll get someone equally unacceptable.

    The fix is to get Coburn, DeMint, Lee, Johnson, Rand Paul, Rubio, etc. enough *allies* that they can elect better leadership.

    Mew

  • whitetop

    Lamar Smith spent 24 years waiting to become Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Now that he has reached his goal he does nothing productive to advance conservative values in the house. He is more interested in being Chairman not doing for the people who elected him.

    Why hasn’t Redstate taken a look at Richard Mack for congressman from Texas Dist. 21? He needs to be looked at if we are to get out of this Washington establishment cycle of do nothing republicans. Go to Sheriff Mack for Congress.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    I’d add a couple more reasons as to why our reps are re-elected. Apathy, laziness, ignorance.

    We had a good challenger to our current rep, Spencer Bachus, in AL-6. While door-knocking for the challenger, I was stunned at the number of registered GOP voters who had no idea Bachus was up for re-election, much less that he was being challenged. Folks will complain a lot, but aren’t willing to do anything but vote, if that. The most common response we got from those we contacted was that it really didn’t make any difference who we elect anyway.

  • streiff

    seems to me all you do is open the doors to fringe candidates.

  • http://www.BillBowenAuthor.com RightinSanFrancisco

    I am a long time fan of Erik’s, have attended a Red State Gathering, and read his book. I am a Romney supporter, but respect the constituency that Erik speaks to and for. Perhaps the Mitch McConnell subject can be one that helps Erik get back on his feed after the Romney primary victory. There has been no better analyst of the conservative movement than Erik; he was early and right on aligning with Jim DeMint in the 2010 election cycle; he has broad respect in the political analyst community.

    Mitch McConnell is not the right guy to lead a Republican Senate with a Republican House and President. I don’t think we need to go to the hard right, but we do need a leader who is more interested in implementing a Republican vision than in working withing the cloak room of the Senate. Perhaps Erik can lead an informed discussion of the options and help us to get to the right place.

    www.RightinSanFrancisco.com

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    Just pointing out there are more reasons than popularity as to why reps are re-elected, or at least there were in Bachus’ case.

  • rabun1016

    McConnell is the worst of the worst. Anyone in law school who runs for head of the student bar assn should be banned from Rep party leadership. Anyone who wants to be a politician before they have achieved anything in private life runs against the grain of conservative and achievement values. It appears McConnell was the perpetual candidate for everything since high school. Now he has become a multimillionaire.

  • rabun1016

    nt

  • northeastred

    Implementing the policy of “No” is going to cement his legacy as a “do-nothing” in the Senate, and I guarantee this will be exploited, to great success, by Obama against the Republicans this fall. Republicans could have given the appearance of wanting to work with the president. Instead, McConnell allowed the image of the Senate as mere obstructionists. It was one of the laziest, dumbest things a Senate leader could do, but he did it anyway. Zero vision. Only interested in letting lobbyists get what they need.

    Granted, he may have no respect for the Tea Party and some of the one-issue zombies coming out of that movement, but he should recognize that they are a valid voice in the Republican Party, and to pay them mere lip service without taking them seriously is another of his great mistakes.

  • samfreeman

    There is something worse than being a nobody with no audience: being a somebody with a hostile audience.

    McConnell is not popular with conservatives here in Kentucky. He will not be reelected in 2014.

  • streiff

    engaged or even aware populace. I just don’t see how one fixes that and the saving grace is that a lot of them don’t vote.

  • justperhaps45

    Voters cast the ballot then go to sleep.
    TURN IT AROUND!
    1) Pay attention.
    2) Tell your rep what you think, listed in effective order.
    Face to face.
    Hand written notes.
    Phone calls.
    Email.
    3) Write letters to the editor to enlist help.
    4) Donate and work for those you believe in.
    5) Convince at least one more person to help.

  • justperhaps45

    A leader must know that people are actively in support. Prayer isn’t enough. A one time “git-er-done” isn’t enough. The leader must hear the foot steps of the crowd right behind.

  • justperhaps45

    A leader must know that people are actively in support. Prayer isn’t enough. A one time “git-er-done” isn’t enough. The leader must hear the foot steps of the crowd right behind.

  • bbee12

    I hope he is defeated next time he is up for re-election. He is one of the reasons there has been no changes made in the past 3 or 4 years. As someone else posted this man has not spine, so easily swayed.

  • Lock_Piatt

    The Senator has clearly been over impressed with the power of the Congress over the people and to hell with the CONSTITUTION – we can do as we please using usurped clauses and SC cases.

  • phenne

    — because what foolish things another state does, repeatedly over time, calcifies and entrenches dangerous twits, who then become “senior” in service, and by Senate rules, attain positions of power.

    Or, put another way, “Your crappy Senator(s) make my life needlessly miserable.”

  • phenne

    you cannot be old. ;)

    The pendulum swings, that I agree. But the “speed” with which the Obamessiah wreak havoc upon this nation can be retro-nuked by God-frearing, oath-abidding statesmen, who UNDERSTAND the U.S. Constitution, ‘as ratified’.

    ‘As Ratified’

    I want for nothing more — and will accept nothing less (as my goal).

  • phenne

    Sorry for the miserable typos

    ‘wreaked’

    ‘-fearing’

    ‘-abiding’

  • acat

    but I suspect I have fewer sunrises ahead than behind.

    Further, postulating a pendulum that took a century to reach this far, the arc is massive and the bob is behemothic to say the least. This ain’t gonna correct overnight….and that’s okay.

    Mew

  • WmCraig

    What is that Ronald Reagan said, if you agree with me on 80% of my agenda, the other 20% doesn’t make you an enemy?

    I believe the ancillary is that if you agree with my enemy 80% of the time, you are not my friend for that other 20%.

    What is the difference between the Federal leadership of Republicans and Democrats, using McConnell and Boehner as examples?

    Total spending in fiscal year 2011 is greater than 2010, and is estimated finish higher again in 2012.

    Why bother electing Republicans if they are only going to spend more than the democrats. See, McConnell is just another Washington Ruling Elite, busy recommending that the rabble should eat cake.

    Can we start that campaign to make him resign now?

  • gagirl74

    Wasn’t it the brilliance of Mitch McConnell who gave us the “super” committee? Was that not one of his pieces of brilliance? I’m sure the military loathes this fool. I know I do and call his office frequently to say so. Why do people from Kentucky continue to send him back? Why do so-called conservatives vote for him to have a position of leadership? Same for Boehner? I have told the RNC that they will get no more money from me until we have TRUE conservative LEADERSHIP in both the House and the Senate and Boehner and McConnell DO NOT QUALIFY as either conservative or leaders! It’s time to end the RINO reign of terror! I see no difference between Boehner and McConnell and any of the dems. Conservatives need to elect someone who cares about our country and not their own power. To do that, we must send ONLY TRUE CONSERVATIVES to D.C. We MUST have a majority of conservatives running both houses to effectuate any change and save our great nation – and to keep pushing Romney to the right, because we will most assuredly have to be pushed to the right if he wins, (and God knows, he HAS to win)!

  • usanovak

    It’s time for McConnell to move out. What a jerk. When does he come up for re-election?

  • powertothepeople

    and not going to play the debate game with this. I have better things to discuss with brighter people.

    And just as quickly as you could use that line about some twit in another state, a liberal could say the same thing about the many great ones in office such as DeMint.

    And I must laugh at the whole senior in service and attain positions of power nonsense since they would remain regardless of term limits, so how do term limits affect that at all?

    There is no valid argument for term limits mandated by law. As Streiff stated on another exact thread, there are already term limits, they are called elections.

    Now on to the brighter folks, sorry I have to leave you over here.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    we would have been better off if MITCH’s seat had gone to the Dems, not if every compromising conservative seat flipped. Because in that way McConnell would not be the minority leader.

    Also, I really don’t think that Romney will be nearly as bad, on spending issues as the current congressional leadership. I doubt that he will be as bad as G W Bush. At least from his rhetoric he seems to really understand that we are standing in quicksand.

  • garfieldjl

    Seriously Pelosi is far worse than McConnell.

  • mustardseed4me

    Term Limits requires Legislation and speaks for everyone. The Voting Booth is for the Voter to voice their opinion and where this belongs. Let the People Speak and Decide!!!

    When our Representatives no longer Represent, then vote their butt out of office. Period.

    It is time for McConnell to go. He has served himself long enough.

  • vangoghssister

    If I remember correctly, this will be Tom Coburn’s last season in the Senate. He has stated many times that he will leave after his second (current) term. I wish he’d stay, but I respect his decision. There are many who could learn a lesson or two from him.

    When he’s here in OK, he delivers babies for free!

  • mustardseed4me

    ?Even a compromise amendment restricting abortion solely to first trimester, non-surgical (pill) methods would be a giant improvement over the status quo, saving millions of innocent lives.?

    Texasref, for those of us who are Conservative, we do not ever negotiate on some points and abortion is one of them. A Social Conservative would never, ever, compromise on abortion because it is in our belief of ?Life? and ?Saving Live? and never ?Compromising Life?.

    Once you start down that road you will find yourself continuing to compromise and moving backwards and those who agree with abortion will gladly help you in their cause and belief.

  • aesthete

    is a short-term tactical maneuver which gets us closer to our ultimate goal without finalizing the mission. There is nothing wrong with compromise when seen in that light.

  • garfieldjl

    Boehner is largely respected by the Conservatives we sent in, we all know he isn’t as good as Newt Gingrich was, but let’s face it, that is a hard standard to match.

    So I think we can keep the pressure on Boehner for right now, and work to get more conservatives in the Senate, then work to take out McConnell in the next available primary.

    Considering Boehner is having to fight Harry Reid and Obama, while watching out for knives coming from Pelosi, and meanwhile McConnell trying to pull the rug out from under him to appease the Dems, he may be doing a much better job than we are giving him credit for.

    I kinda want to see Obama out of office see if we can get someone else to the our leader in the Senate, and then go from there. If Boehner’s performance hasn’t improved, then we can primary him in 2014, but if his performance does improve then we should acknowledge the situation had more to do with McConnell and not Boehner.

  • texasref

    one should not compromise their principles, but that does not mean you can’t compromise on policy to move closer toward honoring those principles.

    President Reagan knew that even after he signed the Mexico City Policy, he would not be ending abortion on demand in America. Should the fact that his policy did not go as far as he would have liked keep him from making a difference to the extent he could?

    Politics is about the art of the possible. Half a loaf is better than none. There is no way 38 states are going to agree to ban all abortions. And if anyone ever had any doubt as to whether I’m a super secret Kos troll, the long-term conservatives will read this comment and know that would be impossible.

  • texasref

    Don’t you see it’s not about McConnell? He is just doing the bidding of the majority of Republicans. Until the tea partiers outnumber the establishments among the Senate Republicans, this problem will continue. So I respectfully disagree.

  • demsaresatanic

    is a poor solution. Better to do what we can in the primary and live with it. The big money thinks abut one election at a time, and incumbent squish works for them, so the primary road is understandably frustrating, but the tea party concept is the way to go in my view as well.

  • ariyosef

    Mitch McM Should have been honest and officially moved to Democrat Party long ago.
    Oh… I forgot, he thinks his lies are less obvious as a Republican…

    How do we suffer such traitors to continue their sabotage!!!???

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …is the appointment of Toomey into another leadership role:

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/04/toomey-to-head-conservative-policy-group-121795.html

  • UpLateAgain

    All too many people are ready to declare the Tea Party Movement dead, even in light of November 2010. I’ve never thought it so, and look forward to a big resurgence in Tea Party sentiments by November.

    But absent the creation of an actual Tea Party party, they’ll fall from the front pages again even if November brings a conservative landslide. A Kentucky ouster of McConnell in 2014 would go a long way towards showing the sentiments remain alive, even if the brand isn’t in the foreground.

  • sensiblethinking

    Mitch McConnell is a hypocrite and a danger to liberty !!

    He has personally turned five Republicans [I know well] against the
    party, and made them Independents…

    He is because of RINO’s like him that we had to have the various state Republican Assemblies—[which the RINO's have corrupted].
    Then we were forced to join the Tea Party movement, since our own party has snubbed and insulted us for over twenty years.

  • sensiblethinking

    and “powertothepeople” is sadly mistaken.

    Term limits are the only answer until the shamefully
    biased media is finally purged and balanced…

    [Furthermore, if "powertothepeople" really did have better things
    to do, he/she would not have posted in the first place. :) ]

  • sensiblethinking

    ‘the people” you are so blindly trusting to make the right decision
    are, for the most part—fools who are only looking out for #1.

    Case in point—have you served on a murder trail jury in the past
    seven years?? When one hears and sees the silly, UN-educated,
    short-sighted, fools who cannot put two sentences together without
    being vulgar— or who cannot even recognize the seriousness of
    murder (as a crime)–you begin to see why this country is in such
    a mess. I heard one woman tell the other jurors that she ‘just knew the accused was innocent’ because she could tell from his eyes when he walked into the court room….. OMG !

    Another way to confirm the problem is to read what is
    posted on many blogs—liberal and ‘conservative’ alike.

  • powertothepeople

    is not in low supply here I see. Phenne, and you now, is about as correct as Obama is a good president.

    If you are too stupid, lazy, or both to mount a strong enough resistance to those you feel need to be out of congress, that is your problem and shortcoming you will have to address. But do not try to fool us into buying the pansy term limit argument as we are not fooled.

    Now, head back over to the moron corner and only come back out when you make a bit of sense.

  • powertothepeople

    is the idiot that stares back at you in the mirror each day. And to come with such a stupid “point” as a murder trial jurist really shows you have no business ever posting with adults.

    Disney has some nice kiddie forums you would fit into well.

  • darrellmaurina

    PowerToThePeople, you’re right about term limits. I realize getting term limits has been on the conservative agenda since Gingrich’s Contract with America, and I understand the benefits, but what employer would say that good employees ought to be replaced with novices periodically just because they’ve been around too long?

    Experience counts. We wouldn’t even consider term limits in private business, and while periodic performance reviews are appropriate, that’s what elections are for.