« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Overplayed Hand of an Amateur

Someone pointed this out to me in email the other day. I believe it was either Neil Stevens or Dan McLaughlin. The point has been made by others as well.

Barack Obama and his campaign have overplayed their hand in one crucial aspect. They spent years getting their friends in the media to believe and sell them as the most experienced campaign team in the world. Look at the 2008 Primary. The Obama campaign would have you believe they beat Paul Begala and James Carville of Team Clinton. They may have beaten Team Hillary Clinton, but they did not beat Begala-Carville. You’d never know that from all the hype.

The reality is actually far different.

In 2000, Barack Obama tried to pick off Rep. Bobby Rush. He went down in flames in that Democratic Primary.

In 2004, Barack Obama beat Jack Ryan, but only did so after Ryan dropped out. Associates close to Obama were able to dribble out the sordid details of Ryan’s divorce and perversions. Alan Keyes stepped in to fully make a joke of the Illinois Republican Party.

In 2008, Barack Obama ran against John McCain, a man who suspended his campaign right at the height of election season to do something no one seemed to understand who seemed to covet the Republican nomination for vindication much more than he coveted actually winning the White House. The seat Obama had won in 2006 flipped back to Republican hands.

Between his election and now, Barack Obama had the House and Senate, did nothing to improve the economy, caved in to Republican demands, grandstanded at the Olympics meeting only to see Chicago lose out, campaigned for Democrats in Virgina, Massachusetts, New Jersey and elsewhere only to have them lose, and has routinely overplayed his hand in office.

That is, in fact, Barack Obama’s true pattern behind the hype and myth. He overplays his hand and has his spin machine convince the Washingto Press Corps that it was all intentional and his campaign team are geniuses.

The only thing is — they aren’t.

Consider Jim Messina, the Obama campaign manager. He released a video to supporters that reeks of a quiet desperation for calm in the face of panic. He says, in part,

“We’re actually ahead of where we were at this point last time around. Remember summer of 2008? Folks don’t remember it this way, but in May and June 2008, a lot of polls were saying we would never pull it off. In fact, eight different national polls had us anywhere from neck-and-neck to down a few points.”

Jim Geraghty notes that nothing could be further from the truth. The Obama campaign, by June of 2008, was ahead in every released poll.

Campaigns and people are fickle. No doubt at some point the Romney campaign will have a worse week than Barack Obama. But for everyone wondering right now how such a well polished and brilliant campaign team could have such a bad series of consecutive weeks the answer is simple. They never were the brilliant, well polished campaign team they’ve claimed to be.

COMMENTS

  • http://conservatisthandbook.blogspot.com cjd87

    How dare you speak ill of the greatest campaigner that has ever lived among us mere mortals?
    Recant and accept his greatness!!!!
    /s

  • http://redpillreport.net/ RedPillReport

    Thanks for reminding everyone about one of the most embarrassing moments of Obama’s comedy of errors: The Chicago Olympic Bid

    The annointed one, along with his mainstream media press corp have tried for years to convince the American people that Obama is respected and revered internationally, that he restored America’s reputation so damaged by Bush. However, like nearly every other part of Obama’s story–this is also fiction.

    The fact is…Obama is seen as a weak, cowardly leader who so desperately craves the approval of the international community that he thinks nothing of throwing American interests and ideals under the bus in order to garner their praise. He (along with his “glamorous” wife) is the butt of jokes both at home and abroad.

    The Olympic bid should have served as a slap across the face to Obama–letting him know people do not bow down at his very presence. But the narcissist-in-chief blamed the failed bid on others, and moved onto his next failure.

    Obama’s heralded campaign team isn’t facing John McCain this time around. I wonder who he’ll blame this loss on?

    @RedPillReport
    http://redpillreport.net/

  • davesinsanantonio

    they have already begun the unison chanting.

  • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

    ^

  • vamoose

    It’s easy to overplay your hand with the help of a fawning press corps(e) and lack of any discernible record. All these geniuses are now find themselves on a new battlefield and their tactics don’t work. Obama has no 2nd act and neither do his campaign guys.

  • romeg

    You can fool ALL of the people SOME of the time, and you can fool SOME of the people ALL of the time, but you can’t fool ALL of the people ALL of the time.

  • gwalt

    Erick,
    I believe it was 2004 when he was (s)elected to US Senate. Other than that, yes he is overhyped. I have been unsuccessful in getting NB or BigJ to start a media campaign against the media—- by face and name. Last night Oreilly had a segment on how much morning ( ABC, CBS, NBC) news would impact the election. For people who do not visit here and or watch Fox, I would say a lot.
    Call out Stepphie, Matt and others by face and name as Obama surrogates. Make non-political voting people know/realize they are being lied to. I suggested this to you and Moe at the 2009 RS gathering.
    Start it, we will donate. We will love seeing Georgie on a billboard with something like this: Do you watch him? Can you trust him? Go to Newsbusters.org to find out!

  • ctredstater

    insulting the World’s Greatest Orator.

    this man is out there busy accomplishing a “Fundamental Transforrmation” of this country – not to mention the world – and ankle-biters like Erik are unhelpfully conflating the minor shortcomings of the people around him with the true Magnificence of The One. How dare you?

  • jerbush91

    One of the greatest tools his handlers had during the last cycle was to blame Bush. Now Mr. Obama has his own record to stand upon and can no longer vote as present.

  • benko

    ..

  • patsee

    that showed up his narcissism and arrogance, was the time when he was in the UK at a dinner with the Queen. He stood up and made the usual long winded toast while the rest of the guests stood to sing “God Save The Queen”. Undeterred he continued bloviating. VERRRRY Presidential.

  • mikeymike143

    its kind of hard to market an edsel as a porsche. :)

  • dave2131

    Day 1 after Romney wins the election there will be claims of voter fraud (which up until then doesn’t exist per Democrats). Then when the talking heads try to figure out what went wrong, they will all come to the conclusion that America is racist – even though 4 years ago we were post-racial America.

    There will be protests and violence I’m sure. This administration will add fuel to the fire – I guarantee that. Although, I hope I’m wrong on the possibility of violence…

  • skipfoss

    They have already started calaims of voter fraud. I haven’t figured out since noone has voted yet that the Obamabots can claim voter fraud, if some body can figure this out let me in on it

  • annie54

    Thank God.

  • Common_Cents

    Obama is a rock star! He is the long lost third member of lip syncing frauds, Milli Vanilli.

    Obama 2012: Hope you can spare some change for my campaign

  • Common_Cents

    girl you know its true!

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Obama will be the subject of “Behind The Music” on VH1, isn’t that where all drug addled, faded rock stars end up?

  • gwbramhall

    How great a politician do you have to be when you have
    the whole West coast, the Northeast East and Illinois in the
    bag before you even clear your throat? He only needs
    to pick off a precious few additional states to become the
    genious that he imagines himself to be. Let’s just hope and
    pray that the rest of the country is awake and alert to the
    danger his relection represents to this country. It’s reasuring
    to be reminded that his campaiign is made of a gang of people
    who can’t shoot straight, but even a stray bullet can finds its
    mark. We have to double down to win this one, there is too much
    riding on it to think that the opponent’s incompetance will carry
    the day for us.

  • bk

    Only the GOP will be reminding people of Obama’s record. The only people hiding from Obama’s record more than Obama will be the Democratic candidates for House and Senate.

  • funwithknives

    and look back at Barry’s fall-back position, whenever Himself’s plans do not work :
    “It’s Not What We Expected…”, or variations of that theme. His flacks use it so often my wife cringes when The News tumbles out,regarding The Latest Unforeseen Circumstance. She knows the punchline is coming…..and it very often does.

    She hates it when I’m even partially right……

  • jaykali

    And in the general. He was able to convince mainstream America that he was everything to everyone. He could wink at Liberals and let them know ‘I am your guy’ while also seeming more centrist to the common man. His life symbolized hope and change and his personal narrative helped sweep him into office. Everything he used to win in 08 is gone now. He is no longer hopeandchange. He has a record. He already broke the racial barrier in the whitehouse. The cat is out of the bag on how he would /actually/ govern. People know he is a liberal president. He is not a centrist. His policies have not worked. I predict DOOM. Now in our divided country a ‘landslide’ is like 5 or 6 points. But that is what I think will happen.

  • funwithknives

    like so many do, forgotten, doing really bad schtick in Somewhere,USA, and living in a Van, Down By The River…!

    But the “Remember When’ specials would be totally sickening…..

  • izoneguy

    a Chevy Volt that has lost it’s juice and run out of gas……

  • izoneguy

    to pass his “landmark” legislation in his first term…..

    Just imagine if he had held back and not blown the 2010 elections…..

    Obama could have easily won 2012 and then thrown the hammer down.

    But that is why he is an amateur.

  • trublutopaz

    Many voters get their news from non-news source. Steven Colbert, John Stewart and late night pundits are far more common news sources from this group. However, there’s a wedge issue-these same groups who don’t read newspapers, don’t watch the news and don’t even bother clicking on the liberal links on Yahoo or Google when checking their email, are part of the economy. If Romney can make the case, and I think he can, that the burden of Federal interference has drastically limited job growth, those who are struggling such as new grads will flock in droves. But he can’t be condescending and he can’t be fake. It’s got to be real numbers, real plans and real hope instead of the dopey hopey change that was sold in 2008.

  • BA Cyclone

    The Dems have the weakest bench, ever!

    Our side has to stop playing the shrinking violet and stand in the gap — but we can do this if we just step up to the challenger…for once.

  • adair

    that “The Republicans are making phone calls, telling people that if they signed the Recall Petition they don’t have to vote today.”

    Does anyone know whether such phone calls were made in California by Gray backers?

    This doesn’t sound like what Republicans do; it does sound like one more arrow in the Dems’ quiver.

  • adair

    n/t

  • BA Cyclone

  • checkmate2012

    It would be a great compaign ad to have Trump talk of O’s love of Hollywood, big money and not the real middle class as he pretends to care about…ending with the classic finger-pointing Trump saying you’re fired!

  • acat

    and steal *their* lunch for a change.

    Mew

  • stevends

    Say what you will about Obama the President, but Candidate Obama’s defeat of Team Hillary in 2008 was a pretty amazing accomplishment. Bill was the most popular man in the party for 15 years, and Obama turned the majority of Democrats against him (briefly).

    And while it is easy to dismiss McCain as a bad candidate running in bad circumstances who made some mistakes, McCain was the most credible nominee the Republican party could have put up (due to his Mavericky independence), and was one of the most popular men in politics in the last decade.

    I’m not saying Team Obama is infallible – they are comprised of human beings and all prone to making mistakes. But as a political organization they are clearly competent. No sense in pretending they are not.

  • checkmate2012

    Not sure if you’ve been out of the country the last couple of months but Team O has been falling flat on it’s face, over and over.

    McCain was a horrible candidate against O.

  • acat

    Hillary had *nada* on her resume (other than carpetbagging in NY and fouling up health care) and is noted as having a “tin ear”… and the country still had a touch of both “Clinton Fatigue” .. and worse, “Dynasty Fatigue”. (Bush to Clinton to Bush to Clinton? Seriously?) The vaunted Team Clinton was facing huge negatives right out of the gate… they were very vulnerable.

    Further, the Clinton campaign – like the McCain campaign – weren’t sure about how to attack the upstartwithout getting cut apart by the race cards. Unlike McCain, they had to attack carefully – don’t want to damage Obama for future use, and a race card bomb would destroy their party – but in hesitation, they lost. They didn’t have anyone ready to throw proxy hits – remember, who else was *seriously* running against Hillary? – and by the time they got people ready, Team Obama’s tabula rasa campaign was ready.

    No, Team Obama’s core competence is presenting a cool, suave, hip image with no substance whatsoever .. and it worked due to – in the primary – Clinton’s huge negatives more than anything.

    They’re a one trick pony. It’s a neat trick, but .. that’s all they have.

    Mew

  • stevends

    Over the 5+ years we have seen them in action, Obama’s political operation has been competent. Going forward that is what we should expect.

    A bad month here and there is bound to happen. Obama had bad months in March and April of 2008 too (“bitter” and “cling” ring a bell?). But overall he ran a very good campaign.

  • acat

    They’re very, very good at one trick – making a naif look good.

    That trick no longer impresses.

    He did NOT run a “very good campaign”…. he ran a very shoddy image-driven campaign and *was allowed to get away with it* because McCain and Hillary don’t have any balls.

    Your logic is the equivalent of saying “That guy who worked at McDonalds for 6 years and won the lottery sure is a good fry cook”….

    Mew

  • stevends

    But it is one thing to say Hillary could have been beaten, quite another to have actually beaten her.

    GWBush put together a powerhouse campaign in 1999, but in 2000 he was still vulnerable. But overall McCain just wasn’t up to the challenge of beating him.

    Romney in 2012 was VERY vulnerable, but Perry and Pawlenty (the only guys with a shot of beating him who actually ran) were CLEARLY not up to it either.

    Running for POTUS is very, very hard. Winning as a first term senator against a popular Senator/former first lady who had the majority of the party machine behind her from the beginning (and who dominated the first 6 months of debates in 2007) is a remarkable feat. It’s ok to admit it.

  • stevends

    But, I’m curious… What is your “ideal” presidential campaign? They are all imperfect, with imperfect candidates.

    Bush 2000? Won Florida by 500 votes because he spent final days in California projecting his inevitable victory.

    Clinton ’92? Would there be a President Clinton if not for Ross Perot? GHWBush ran a mediocre campaign.

    Reagan ’80 and ’84? Sure, but the ’84 Reagan campaign had minimal substance and fantastic economic growth and Mondale promising to raise taxes, while the ’80 campaign was against Jimmy Carter.

  • acat

    They are very good at making an unknown guy look very, very good.

    They did an impressive job of making him look good with no record… but they can’t repeat that. Their trick doesn’t work with a known guy.

    Mew

  • checkmate2012

    without having both Chambers anymore? Zero political ability.

    He sold the Bush wary country a bill of goods, they bought and now many have buyers remorse.

    The shiny new penny is tarnished and so are his tactics.

  • stevends

    I’m talking about the competence of his political organization.

    Political organizations take candidates, issues and positions and try to make them popular with the country. When GWBush selected Cheney to be his VP, Rove told Bush that Cheney wasn’t going to be good for his electoral prospects. Bush told him, too bad, its your job to make the decision popular, so go make it popular.

    Right now Obama has a 47% approval rating. Not good, but not terrible. In light of the country’s economic performance, it should be much lower. That means that either:

    1) He is a good politician (and/or has a good political operation) who is more popular than he should be, or
    2) His political opponents are poor at making him unpopular.

    I guess there is a third option that the electorate is much more foolish than they’ve ever been, but that is the kind of statement that ends all intelligent discussion. You could also argue that the depth and lingering effects of the 2008 financial crisis give him a free pass and inflate his popularity. That happens rarely – Ike had inflated popularity for saving the world from the Nazi’s, LBJ had inflated popularity in ’64 b/c of Kennedy assassination, etc. But I think that is minimal.

  • checkmate2012

    The MSM props him up everyday and keeps saying how likeable he is and that’s what the general electorate hears. But they feel in it their paycheck if they have one, so I don’t think the O team has a leg to stand on this go ’round. No more avoiding the real issues which is exactly what their campaign is based upon: smoke and mirrors.

    I agree with you his approval rating should be much, much lower.

  • stevends

    You have to play the game as it is, not as it should be. It is still possible for politicians of both parties to become media darlings. Staying there is of course much, much harder.

    It takes a lot of political skill to be portrayed as one.

  • checkmate2012

    “Jill and Michelle ?Would Not Have Any Chance? Without Govt.-”

    I guess their wives live the life of Julia too..I’ll name Obama Julien 1 and Julien 2!

    BY: Washington Free Beacon Staff – June 5, 2012 3:44 pm

    “Vice President Joe Biden said Tuesday that his wife, as well as the wife of President Barack Obama, would have had ?no chance? in life had it not been for government help. According to vice presidential pool reports:

    Vice President Biden met with leaders from 10 colleges this afternoon to kick off a new effort to increase transparency in financial aid packages. ?

    ?I know, literally, Barack and I talk about it. Neither one of us would have had any shot,? Biden said. ?The same with our wives. Both wives are smarter than both of us. Literally, these very accomplished women would not have any chance without some help.?

  • acat

    Turning a hard-fought, nearly successful campaign against an entrenched establishment guy into a hard-fought *successful* campaign against the *entire establishment* four years later… and then coming from behind to crush Jimmy Carter’s nuts in a landslide….. (I’ll point out that Mitt Romney is on this path …)

    Clinton would have lost if H.W. Bush had shiv’d Perot like he deserved. Not because Clinton ran a bad campaign .. but because that would have meant Bush had his heart in it… and that’s the real reason he lost. Perot was merely a symptom.

    As for Reagan ’84 … I suspect that all the materiel for as hard-fought and difficult a campaign as 1980 was available, but .. why waste it on a sad sack like Mondale?

    Oh, and I do not agree to disagree. You have failed to prove your point, you’ve merely asserted that I’m in error; I suspect because you have some kind of man-crush on Axelrod.

    Mew

  • Jack_Savage

    Axelrod’s specialty is packaging unknown black candidates for consumption by the masses. He is in uncharted territory here, and it shows. You can be an idiot and win locally, and even statewide (see: Joe Biden), but when you are POTUS the whole world is watching.

    Obama simply is in over his head, and really never was interested in the actual job of being President.

  • teapartypatriot4ever

    Yes, everything that has been said and documented of Obama and his crony radical anti-American Liberal Progressive Socialist-Marxist actions and policies that have been thus far been enacted, installed, implemented, executed, and otherwise forced down the American peoples throats like Obamacare, and so on, is true.

    But what does that say about the American voters who put him into office and power without caring about who he was, and what he wanted to do to America, our Freedoms, Liberties, Rights, Democracy, the US Constitution, and the Republic itself.

    Is the majority of American people so liberally indoctrinated or are so indifferent ie; the 2008 election of Obama- to be so apathetic that they take their responsibility in this US Constitutional Republic so callously and carelessly as to vote someone like Obama into office and power whose only agenda and goal was to fundamentally transform America into a Socialist-Marxist State, thus destroy their very Country and Freedoms and Rights and Economy..

    The answer from comes from all the elections that have thus far happened since the 2008 Election, The American people have reawakened and realized their egregious error and massive mistake, that which the consequences from can be devastating and disastrous as we have seen all throughout history, as well as in present circumstances.

    But does the GOP Primary election of Romney say they have learned their lesson… I believe the answer to be No.. Romney is not as bad as Obama, but Romney is still the same as Obama in so many aspects of being and implementing liberal progressive policies, laws, and agenda., along with being and utilizing cronyism . His hypocrisy in this area double standard double taking against Obama’s policies like individual forced mandated healthcare State Socialized Medicine is an example, for which he will not refute, and said was a conservative cause, which it is not, as well as saying Obamacare must be repealed, when he will not do the same for Romneycare, the very exact same thing he attacks Obama for.. Thus why would anyone vote for the same liberal progressive person with the same liberal progressive policies as Obama.

    NO, the people have yet to learn their mistakes, and have yet to learn that only real conservative values and principles if Reaganonmics, and of putting the US Constitution and Democracy and Freedom and Liberty first before party politics, is the only answer to America;s woes, past, present, and future.

  • checkmate2012

    on Conservatism. Also your grammer and punctuation stinks, but leaving that aside, your empahtic “NO’ in the last paragraph tells me that you are yet another troll with a name that no one will challenge.

    Nice attack on R and your blatent vote for O: “why would anyone vote for the same liberal progressive person with the same liberal progressive policies as Obama.”

    C Ya!

  • APA Guy

    “Romney is not as bad as Obama, but Romney is still the same as Obama in so many aspects of being and implementing liberal progressive policies, laws, and agenda., along with being and utilizing cronyism .”

    Just like “I’m a conservative, but…”

    Mods, the ball is in your court :)

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    As Bill S a couple of weeks ago “The time to discuss whether he is worthy of our vote has passed.”

  • ariyosef

    NOT TRUTH. NOT the SAME as O!

    As much as I, too, prefer a more conservative candidate,
    your words against the best currently available candidate, border on insane.

    I too am 62 year native Texan. Proud of it and independent, even also a RP fan.

    But I am NOT STUPID enough to foolishly flush the best and only choice and REAL alternative CHALLENGE the impending destruction of our NATION if we follow your suicidal thoughts. Your mentality as expressed above is what hurt RP.

    RP will not get a chance for second ballot of delegates so? curb your bitterness.

    GET REAL and wake from your idiocy….

    Romney is

    NOT a Socialist.
    NOT a hater of AMERICA.
    NOT against the CONSTITUTION.
    NOT likely to allow more liberals on the Supreme Court.
    NOT for Abortion on demand much less Pre birth termination of Infants.

    Romney CANNOT quote the Quoran from memory.
    Romney is NOT a LOVER of the Militant Muslim Brotherhood.

    Romney IS a natural born US Citizen qualified to hold the highest office.

    Romney HAS Become MORE Conservative in this year.

    teapartypatriot4ever WAKE UP FROM YOUR BITTER NIGHTMARE!
    Truth is respectful:
    Your post is neither nor is it wisdom.

  • stevends

    Of all the things I look for in a POTUS, the inability to quote the Quoran from memory has to be at the top of the list.

    That and natural born U.S. Citizen (over the age of 35, of course).

  • acat

    Maybe one of those Adamses too. I forget, been a while since my “biographies are cool” phase.

    Mew

  • rightlane1111

    I think W did a good job in 04 with his campaign.

  • rightlane1111

    with thuggery. As far as his approval rating…I don’t believe that any more than I believe that we are on the road to recovery. We have not been since he came into office. The entire thing has been a facade.

    Some talking head says that he is popular with the people…that his personal popularity is up. I have not spoken to “ONE” (1) PERSON so far that agrees with that…NOT ONE. So…we have “paid” pundits and leftwing websites spouting misinformation…not to mention the constant “LYING” by Obama himself…and those that don’t think..that don’t contribute..that don’t work…they say…well if so and so said it…it must be true. But…now that O’s policies are starting to take effect…not so much…not so much at all.

    Even students who are living on College-funded welfare at our expense have noticed that their interest rates are going up. Oh…the MSM might not report that…but that is what they see. They are not too happy and Mommy and Daddy are tapped out. Why because of O’s policies. Guess where that bill originated? In Obamacare…and somehow..someway…Obama has to fund what is already taking place. Smoke and Mirrors and We are sick of people that MISLEAD. Do you like liars? I don’t.

    Walker, according to the press, had a slight lead and it was closing fast to dead even. What is the result…Walker by 7%. That was the polls. Last night I listened, in HORROR, to MSNBC. They predicted that Barrett was the winner…that he was ahead. So much for talking heads and polls. Mr. Ed, the talking horse, even cried…but it did not work.

    Your candidate is not good for America and America has begun to figure that out…even the ones that get it all on “our dime”.

  • acat

    is still strong, and can be used by both parties. I don’t know what he could have changed, but .. W is not an orator, and his campaign had to work harder because of it.

    Mew

  • rightlane1111

    during this campaign. That little remark in South Carolina (I believe) old Billy Boy WILL NEVER, EVER FORGET.