« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Morning Briefing for June 19, 2012

RS MB CleanMasthead

RedState Morning Briefing

June 19, 2012

Go to www.RedStateMB.com to get
the Morning Briefing every morning at no charge.

———————————————————————-

1. Twenty Inconvenient Years for the Left’s Media Spin on Obamacare

The year was 1990.

Then Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. of Delaware and Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina introduced S. 3266, the Crime Control Act of 1990. The law, introduced on October 27, 1990, sailed through Congress in one day. It passed the Senate by unanimous consent before 5 o’clock that evening. At 11:56 p.m. the House of Representatives approved it by 313-1. It was a bipartisan compromise and sailed through both house of Congress with Republicans and Democrats alike approving it. For perspective on this bipartisan act of supposed good governance, it took longer to for the legislation to be put in final form and presented to the President than it did to pass the Congress. Having been introduced and passed on October 27, 1990, it was not even presented to the President until November 19, 1990, and was not signed until ten days later.

Three years later, many of the same Republicans who supported the Crime Control Act of 1990 would rally behind the individual mandate as their counter-proposal to Hillary Clinton’s healthcare plan.

In 1995, five members of the United States Supreme Court declared one section of the bipartisan Crime Control Act of 1990, called the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, an unconstitutional reach for the federal government even via the commerce clause. The case, United States v. Alfonso Lopez, Jr., 514 U.S. 549 (1995) was the first time in a half century the Supreme Court restricted Congress’s powers under the commerce clause of the Constitution.

Lopez hindered Congress’s power to restrict people’s ability to carry guns near schools — not exactly something a lot of Americans were against. There was no hue and cry from the left about how the Supreme Court was going to be unpopular. But more importantly, back in 1995, it did not matter that the Republicans, like the Democrats, thought Congress had the power to regulate guns carried near schools.

The benefit of being a leftist is that history does not matter. Twenty years after the law passed with no thought as to its constitutionality, the left is setting up the media narrative anticipating Obamacare being overturned all because the left never bothered, at the time, to take seriously the idea that the individual mandate might be unconstitutional.

Please click here for the rest of the post.

2. Energy Policy *IS* Grassroots Politics

Compare and contrast these maps. First, the “undervote” by county in the recent Pennsylvania Democratic Presidential primary. The numbers in each county represent the proportion of voters in a Democratic primary who selected “no candidate” rather than vote for the incumbent, Barack Obama.

Now, the distribution map of the Marcellus Shale.

Please click here for the rest of the post.

3. What to take away from the debunking of MSNBC’s fake Romney WaWa ‘scandal.’

Background: Mitt Romney made a campaign speech today that used the WaWa convenience store franchise’s touch screen sandwich menu feature to make the point of how more cool and efficient the private sector is, when compared to the government. MSNBC doctored the clip to make it look like Romney was merely astounded that we have touch screen sandwich menus now*. Lots of people called MSNBC out on it. Hijinks are now going to ensue.

Please click here for the rest of the post.

COMMENTS

  • commonsenseobserver

    According to ABC News. Hasn’t even been vetted by Beth Meyers.

    And apparently, 66% of independents support that DREAM, um, decree. We need to come up with a credible alternative while hammering Obama’s lack of respect for our constitutional system, which most people probably don’t see, and can’t see unless we remind them that separation-of-powers exists.

    And the folks at DK seem to be whining about the Romneys’ horse deduction. Any chance Mitt didn’t know about that thing at all? And why on earth does that even exist???

  • commonsenseobserver

    HM Gov. stopped Russia from arming Assad by cancelling the ship’s insurance.

  • commonsenseobserver

    But as Mitt Romney said in Ohio a few days ago, the problem is that small businesses are taxed at individual rates, and most pay the top rate. We need to make that case. Allowing taxes to rise will only harm small businesses and destroy opportunities for working families.

    I frankly doubt shouting “class warfare” will work, seeing that Americans seem to like that.

  • sesom

    not business taxes

  • commonsenseobserver

    Which offers a more compelling defense than attempting to justify “tax cuts for the rich”. Voters just won’t care. They’ll shut their eyes and ears to such arguments, even ifwe bring up investment and all.

    When we cut individual rates across the board, we are cutting taxes for working families and small businesses. We are putting money back in hardworking taxpayers’ pockets, rewarding hard work, and allowing middle-class families to participate in investment and creating a better future for their children. I believe that’s the case we should focus on making.

  • Kyle-MI

    With Manchin and other WV Dems skipping the convention, there is an opportunity to paint him into a corner. The GOP need to attack him 24-7 on Obamacare repeal. Even if he wins (likely at this point) we can soften him up to vote for repeal. We will need all the help we can get.

  • Kyle-MI

    The MSM is quoting him as saying that he would come here illegally if he could not provide food for his family. I would do the same if faced with the same choice. What I wouldn’t do is then demand citizenship or any of the other privileges granted by it. I would learn the language of the country. I would respect the customs of the country and live by their laws and rules. I would stay out of trouble. I would expect the situation to be temporary and move back at the next best opportunity.

  • Kyle-MI

    Would should you care (as a libertarian) whether a tax is on businesses or individuals?

  • rightlane1111

    First of all, we have two sets of rules and apparently we have gotten very use to the Cuban exodus. Fleeing from a tyrannical dictator and getting here on dry land allows Cubans to apply for citizenship. Now, I am not sure where it is political asylum or not and perhaps one of you can post about that.

    Again, I am not for illegal immigration. I posed a question yesterday, asking for suggestions on how you would solve this problem, i.e., all these people in this country and how you would deport them with the current nanny state ideology imbedded in the brains of our representatives?

    What would you do? I would flee and try to take care of my family. We need to find a better way to deal with this situation. It is here, it is not going away and amnesty is not the answer, thank you Obama.

    So, again…what is your take. You find fault with Rubio going through the “CORRECT” MOTIONS in Congress…but if that is not the answer…what would you do? They are here..so what now?

  • Kyle-MI

    If your boat gets a hole in it, you need to fix the hole. No matter how much you bail, at some point you need to fix the hole.

    No body likes the amnesty plans or dealing with the illegal immigration population because we have all been burned on this before. Politicians bring this up to distract everyone from the fundamental problem of the unsecured border. We do need to deal with the people already here, but as long as the border is not secured, all the solutions are simply short term. It goes away for a little while and then comes back in even worse shape with even more illegals. We need to break that cycle. Neither Rubio’s nor Obama’s plan fix anything long term.

  • rightlane1111

    There is a difference in Rubio’s plan…they can apply, just like anyone else for citizenship if they get to the back of the lines after getting them to applying for a “permit”. I call it that because anything more…say like an ID would send the Libs off their rails.

    That makes some sense…otherwise…we have no way of knowing who is in this country illegally. Oh…and btw…our government agencies, say SS/Family Services…do they ask for US citizenship when Illegals apply? If we would enforce the law. SECURE THE BORDER…this time…do it…no exceptions. Then let’s see what we are dealing with in terms of numbers of people, who by applying, would agree to abide by the law, meaning after a period of time, return to their native country.

    At least Rubio…at the minimum…if you don’t like him…went through Congress.

  • acat

    demonstrated poor timing or not depends entirely on whether and when they knew Obama was mulling an executive fiat amnesty.

    As for the solution? It’s going to be a mix of deportations and amnesty, both self-deportations and incarceration-then-deport for criminal elements, and a guest-worker-amnesty with maybe a path to more for “desirable” candidates, i.e. those with an in-demand skill set.

    This should be argued out in Congress – Rubio was right to bring it up, and since I don’t know when or whether he knew what Obama was planning, I won’t question his timing.

    Mew

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    I was wrong on this. It is working out brilliantly for Romney. Please take a look at what Ruben Navarette wrote on cnn.com. It seems the “Dream Act” NOW part of the Latino community are coming around to the secret that uh… OBAMA LIES. This is what happens when the only principle you have is the Man in the Mirror.

  • rightlane1111

    N/T

  • Kyle-MI

    It is just more pointless bailing without plugging the leak. We will be readdressing this again 10-20 years down the road.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Obama did this by fiat that is getting no play in the mainstream press. Their names are Jon Tester, Claire McCaskill, Sherrod Brown, Bob Casey, Joe Manchin, Debbie Stabenow, Bill Nelson, and Bob Menendez. There is no way in Hades that Harry Reid wanted an up or down vote on this in his caucus in an election year where 1/3 of his caucus is up for reelection in rust belt or swing states. Manchin, Tester and McCaskill in particular were toast if they voted yeah on Rubio’s bill.

  • commonsenseobserver

    http://www.humanevents.com/2012/06/19/social-media-gop-needs-to-bring-a-game-to-mitt-romneys-online-profile/

  • checkmate2012

    this week at a national Hispanic conference. Rubio has been working to get support in Congress since Apr of this year. Both Rubio and Obama will be speaking at the conference and Obama wanted to usurp Rubio. Obama stole most all of Rubio’s ideas.Timing was everything to O.

  • acat

    Rubio puts his plan on the shelf and waits for 2013. No big loss.

    Romney gets to point at Obama’s proclamation as “amnesty by fiat” in rust-belt States,

    Obama has also ticked off some in the open-borders Hispanic bloc by not going far enough. They may vote for him, but they won’t be nearly as fired up come November. “Why re-elect him, what’d he do for us?”

    Once again, Obama looks amateurish and reactive rather than professional and leader-ish… which is what I’ve come to expect.

    Mew

  • checkmate2012

    won’t even pursue it now. Rubio is making it hard on Romney tho’ IMO. it’s not something Romney wants to debate now.

    Also I’ve heard many Hispanics are suspect of, if it was so fair and just, why didn’t O do it long ago. I still think legal immigrants don’t want amnesty.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    I actually believe the “Every Open Borders, All Amnesty, All the time Hispanic bloc” might actually be the one group that does sit this one out. On principle they disagree with Republicans in general and conservatives in particular but they are not happy with Obama/Reid. The fact that Obama took this step (besides that Rubio forced it on him) shows Chicago is worried about this bloc.

  • acat

    I don’t think Rubio was ever on Romney’s short list. Overall, I think this is a Good Thing – the main argument I’ve heard in favor of Rubio is the false “he brings the Latino vote” one. That Rubio is a great orator and stand-up guy are not an argument for the veep slot, eh? Let him become a great Senator and Governor then run for the top slot on his own, not in Romney’s shadow.

    Romney has established his talking points on the border and immigration, they are nicely to the right from Romney’s decision to poke at Perry on “amnesty”, and Team Romney haven’t moved them.

    This will play well for Romney in the Rust Belt, especially Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin, and it won’t cost Romney significantly in any up-for-grabs States except maybe Colorado and Iowa .. maybe … (what, it’s gonna cost him Texas? Hahahaha!)

    I don’t think Rubio hurt Romney here at all .. and I do think Rubio has enhanced his reputation as “the guy who can get this done” going into 2013.

    Mew

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    very well for Romney. Obama is managed to tick off the only two constituencies that burn White Hot on this issue (White Hot meaning it influences who you vote for). It reminds conservatives everything they hate and fear about O, but it has also reminded ?Every Open Borders, All Amnesty, All the time Hispanic bloc? that Obama has done none of the things he promised. The legal immigrants that don’t want amnesty in general aren’t burning white hot (i.e. they’ll vote for the same reasons everyone else votes). Romney: he’ll just keep saying “Secure the borders, strong eVerify to take away incentive for folks to come here illegally and Hispanics are unemployed at a rate of 3% higher than normal in the Obama economy”. If Romney got caught in a hurricane, with 10 tornadoes bearing down on him, Putin launched a nuclear strike and three clowns started singing “Poker Face” while nude…Romney would still say “man this Obama economy just doesn’t create jobs”. Nothing knocks that dude off message.

  • acat

    Might help us some in Arizona, not that I think we’ll have trouble there.

    Not sure how big a percentage of the Open Borders Hispanic bloc are in Colorado or Iowa .. those are the only two that I think can swing….

    Mew

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    That Rubio didn’t give Romney the heads up before he went public. I also believe Rubio is smart enough and a big enough adult to understand that Boston would have to let people know that Rubio wasn’t on their short list. I also am pretty sure that if Boston had believed this was suicide for them and relayed that to Rubio; he would not have proceeded.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Heck 15 votes in Colorado might be the difference. PPP has Obama 49-42 in Colorado…meaning that race is a dead heat (given PPP’s normal slavering for Obama). Hispanics comprise 22% of the population in Nevada, got to be some disaffected Open Borders crowd there.Oh and New Mexico, if Obama has to defend New Mexico, it’ll be sayonara to his reign, uh I mean administration.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    This is actually believe it or not a pretty good Hispanic vote in Virginia (that and the DC suburbs are the reason Virginia is the one Southern “swing” state).

  • checkmate2012

    a debate on this now and acat, you & I have both agreed we don’t want Rubio for VP.

    So tnfriend, you too are right in that I’m sure Rubio signaled to Romney what he was up to. Not that it was a big secret since Rubio has been openly working on his Bill since April.

    Sowas wrong and now agree it didn’t put Romney in a spot and Romney is holding tough, but I still believe he’d rather not be spending any breath on it. Really O is the one that tried to force his hand and it’s not working like Team O planned :)

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    If exit polling is to be believed…Ralph Nader took about 15,000 net votes from Al Gore (God, bless those 15,000 Nader voters) in Florida in 2000.

  • acat

    Set the wayback machine to 2008

    Flip North Carolina back to the GOP, consider it an early Christmas gift from Bev Perdue. Indiana also flips to the GOP. No way they elect Mourdock and then elect Obama. Finally, flip Florida. This one, I’ll admit, is going to be close, but Florida’s been trending Red.

    Leave Colorado, Virgina, and Iowa with the Dems. Those are the States that you’re arguing will toggle away from Romney.

    Now… toggle Ohio and Wisconsin over to the GOP. Walker bruised the Wisconsin Dems .. I think it’s either in play or close enough.

    Next, flip either Michigan or Pennsylvania or Minnesota.

    Mew

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    This is another of Obama’s “wars” that is doomed to failure. What Chicago has got to eventually come around too is they can’t avoid Obama’s record. Those moderates and independents that won’t “vote for a Republican” most certainly won’t vote for an incompetent marxist. Obama’s only chance to avoid his record was to convince enough voters that Mitt Romney was a kook. However, that ship has sailed. Moderate and independent voters want the President to tell them why after suffering the largest increase in poverty and the biggest destruction of wealth since the Great Depression they should return his blessed assurance to the White House. Everyday Chicago spends on any other message is a day one more moderate or independent makes the decision to fire them. As the incumbent, Barack Obama will not be given the option to avoid having to explain his record to the people who employ him.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    way I can…good luck David Axelrod, you sorry SOB, trying to make a campaign slogan out of “creates poverty, destroys wealth”.

  • acat

    Works, yes?

    Mew

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Bad economics, the Hispanic vote actually is closer to 55-45 (60-40 at worst) which isn’t enough to overcome the massive vote in the panhandle. In addition, Romney is going to do better in the retired Jewish communities in Florida than any Republican in history. I wouldn’t be surprised that by October/November, Obama doesn’t quietly withdraw from Florida. O has no shot in North Carolina this time (I mean even they know this – they sent Beau Biden as their surrogate, seriously Beau Biden). Virginia is the only Southern swing state this cycle. We’ll be looking at the turnout in Southwestern Virginia (there is no where in the country where Dogeater is less popular). Indiana isn’t even a serious play for Chicago and Missouri is out of here as well. Nevada, Colorado, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, New Hampshire, Iowa and Virginia…those are the ones up for grabs. I just have a hard time believing Pennsylvania is actually in play. Though I do think Ohio is certainly trending positively for Romney.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    is the pundits at CNN are declaring Obama “scooped” Romney or on Politico calling this “political genius”. I mean do these guys actually get paid for this? How can you be so out of touch with the voters? Immigration as an issue that saves Obama, really? Somewhere I know Carville and Begala are sitting down to drinks and crying in their beers or laughing the rears off. I mean I hate to be the one that spells this out but the sliver of the cheese wheel that cares about immigration is small (and half that sliver is the people on the right who oppose amnesty in all its forms) and none of those who care are moderate or independent voters. But the economy, jobs, the price of milk…that is the whole cheese wheel.

  • acat

    The two groups that Obama’s Hispandering incensed are …

    Open-borders Hispanics – affects Virginia, Colorado, Iowa.

    Rust-belt blue-collar workers whose jobs are threatened – affects the whole rust belt. That includes Pennsylvania.

    Yes, Pennsylvania won’t be easy, but .. did *anyone* expect Wisconsin to be in the “maybe” column?

    Mew

  • aesthete

    as an act of inspired brilliance. They are so far removed from the subject matter, and so insulated by the country as a whole, that it’s all an abstraction to them.. You might as well be talking about Azerbaijan, for all their familiarity with it.

  • acat

    Why do we assume that, with this bit of evidence in front of us, they aren’t doing just as poorly on topics we’re less familiar with?

    Mew

  • aesthete

    because they were towering intellects with a mastery of other subjects.

    Personally, I find the “story within a story” of the editorialized, embellished, or interpretive narrative more interesting than what’s being said — when I read a story about Africa in the NYT, am I reading about a famine in Zimbabwe, or am I reading a puff piece on various human rights organizations and a ploy for readers to support foreign aid in Africa? What are the sources being cited, and the journalist himself, wanting me to get out of the piece, and why?