« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Eric Cantor & The Pro-Life Statists Take Sides In North Carolina

North Carolina’s 8th Congressional District provides the quintessential battleground between go-along to get-along Republicans and small government conservatives.

Richard Hudson, a Capitol Hill careerist, returned home to North Carolina from Washington, DC to run for Congress to go back to Congress. He is a Republican careerist — just like so many of the Republicans in Capitol Hill who have helped drive up the nations’ debt. Just read his own biography from his own website:

Richard worked for the 1996 Richard Vinroot for Governor campaign and later served as Communications Director of the North Carolina Republican Party. He was then named District Director for Congressman Robin Hayes and led the Congressman’s Concord and Rockingham offices for six years. In 2005, Congresswoman Virginia Foxx (R-NC) named Richard Chief of Staff and he later served in the same capacity for Congressman John Carter (R-TX). In 2008, Richard was named Campaign Manager of Pat McCrory for Governor. In 2009, he was appointed Chief of Staff to Congressman Mike Conaway (R-TX) and served in that role for over two years.

When he went back to North Carolina, he went back and did something called “strategic consulting,” which is DC careerist speak for using his Washington connections. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Eric Cantor and his Young Guns PAC are pouring more money into this race. Why do they want Richard Hudson? Because he was a team player as a staffer and they know he’ll be a team player as a congressman. Just one of the guys on the same team that helped get us to $16 trillion in national debt.

On the other hand, Dr. Scott Keadle is not a careerist in Washington. Scott Keadle is not a lobbyist. Scott Keadle is dentist. He’s the type of citizen politician we always say we want — a Rand Paul type who got involved because he sees the country going to hell in a hand basket, not because he wanted to go back to Washington as the boss instead of the staffer.

Between the two of them, Scott Keadle has a record, not just a resume. His record is as a county commissioner in local government standing up for small businesses and against tax increases. We know where he stands based on what he has already done. All we know about Richard Hudson is that he is a creature of Washington who the Washington crowd wants back.

The most destructive thing to ever happen to the GOP was to be overrun with pro-life statists — Republicans who are perfectly happy to preside over an expansion of government and debt for their own political allies, but they love them some babies.

Unless conservatives are willing to fight for people like Scott Keadle against Eric Cantor and the coalition of pro-life statists who won’t actually cut spending, we deserve to lose.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • spoasteph97

    Great diary entry!

    I am FULLY PRO-LIFE, but that doesn’t mean I sacrifice all other issues, like the economy.

    Besides, where was Eric Cantor when Dede Scozzafava and Doug Hoffman were fighting for one seat. Dede (the pro-abortion statist) versus Doug (the pro-life, fiscal hero).

    Here’s a link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2369216/posts

    Rep. Cantor and his buddies can drop the title of “pro-life”…and just call themselves plain statists!

    GO SCOTT KEADLE 2012!

  • spoasteph97

    I don’t mean any disrespect to this post, but how can I get a diary at RedState??? I requested a diary about 6 weeks ago, and I have yet to receive one. Is there something I’m suppose to do?

    Please help! Thanks.

  • Tbone

    I checked out Hudson’s website and the jerk is criticizing Keadle for taking Stimulus money for his County that Hudson’s cronies voted for.

    Richard, you are a hypocrite.

  • renl57

    Or more specifically, to a link to a diary posted by Rep. Virginia Foxx here on RedState.com

    http://www.redstate.com/virginiafoxx/2012/05/01/richard-hudson-is-the-true-conservative-candidate-for-congress/

    Evidently they didn’t bother to look at the comments following that article.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    and write away.

  • Bill S

    …that the Diary Approval team is under-staffed. The requests are a bit backlogged. You should be ready to go.

  • http://tuleya.com Tuleya

    Erick, you are well on your way to becoming “enlightened”, ready to do whatever the liberals want. Are you working for Kissell?

  • Bill S

    Or do you just spout off like this all the time?

  • shadowbear12

    “Go-along to get-along” and “team player” are phrases that very clearly summarize my critique of and frustration with the Republican Party leadership that I have faithfully supported for over 30 years. I do not vote or contribute to send politicians to DC to build alliances and careers for themselves, nor to make friends. I am looking for people who will fight to defend freedom, limited government at the national level, and the clear intent of the constitution. I too am frustrated with single-issue voters and so-called social conservatives who really are not actually conservative, but are special interests merely seeking to have big government be “their” big government. I be lovin me some babies too, and so therefore I want representatives who will fight to uphold the constitution, so babies can grow up in freedom.

  • edintexas

    I think he’s trying to say his family back in NC supports Hudson, or maybe he went to school with Hudson. In any event, who the heck is Kissell? I know its tough being a conservative in OR, but he’s apparently not exactly keeping up with the primary race in NC-8 (while presumably commenting on Erick’s take on that race).

  • red_oakster

    Keadle clearly believes in a strong national security policy, and does not appear to have any of Paul’s isolationist leanings. So he is much better than Rand Paul.

  • eldstenorge

    I fully understand what is being said here, however, if we criticize each other like this, we will never prevail, nor will we ever have the blessings of the Lord on this nation. John Adams said: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” In other words, Red State and all those who believe libertarianism, etc., is America’s Savior, think again. We are not working because we do not put our Lord first. “Blessed is the nation who’s God is the Lord.” Remember it and criticize the things of the Lord at your own peril. It is obvious that Scott Keadle is the best candidate here, but the attack on prolifers is not appreciated and will not get you where this nation should be.

  • Bill S

    …believes that libertarianism is America’s savior, you’re reading the wrong web site. There are libertarians that comment and post user diaries here, but I assure you that the contributing editors are by and large NOT libertarians.

    The issue Erick focuses on is the “statist” part, not the pro-life part. As has been discussed here in the past, the only clear-cut requirement to be a contributor on the RS front page is that we be pro-life. I assure you that there is no ambiguity on the pro-life nature of Redstate.com. None.

  • spoasteph97

    Thank you to mbecker909 and Bill S for all your help and getting me a diary.

  • Bill S

    I waded through a BUNCH of backlogged reqs last night while watching the Cardinals lose. It’s stunning how many spam requests we have to weed out. Sorry about the delay.

  • acat

    It appears that eldstenorge is engaging in a pro-religious anti-libertarian screed, ala the Santorum campaign.

    While not all libertarians are pro-life, the ones on Red State .. to be even more precise, the ones *who last* on Red State are equally anti-abortion although not necessarily for the same reasons.

    The unborn are a treasure, the unborn are our future, we destroy them at our peril… but we enslave them by electing statists like Santorum and Cantor.

    Mew

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    big-government populist Republicans like Santorum and Huckabee and starts practicing the concept of “small government” we can talk.

    Libertarianism certainly is nobody’s savior. Neither is a big government.

    It’s obvious that much of the machinery that promotes itself as “pro-life leadership” – and many here will argue they are not – like guy in Iowa who bused in voters from churches to support Santorum for a cool million dollars or the group in Texas that anointed him the candidate of the religious right are not in the least interested in controlling the reach or the spending of the federal government.

    You don’t appreciate what you see as an “attack on prolifers”, I can tell you that there are lots of pro-life folks – me included – who are way past tired of “social” conservatives who stamp their feet and threaten to stay home if “their” anointed candidate isn’t nominated.

    When so-called “social” conservatives decide to drop the “social” tag and become conservatives this discussion will stop.

  • Bill S

    I was just responding to the accusation that RS is somehow a hotbed of institutional libertarianism. I recognize the nature of the vast majority of the libertarian commenters wrt. life issues…and appreciate that.

  • acat

    What I don’t get is the idea that somehow all Christianity must reject libertarianism (or Libertarianism for that matter..) …

    It just seems very strange, to me, that a religion that claims to be all about an individual relationship with Jesus has a problem with a political philosophy that’s based around the liberty of the individual …

    I could more easily understand why a hierarchical denomination like Catholicism or a hierarchical religion like Islam would reject libertarian thought … but evangelicals … ?

    Mew

  • aesthete

    Hugo Chavez is pro-life. Conservatives often criticize him for his economic policies in Venezuela, and his political repression. Ergo, conservatives are upholding libertarianism as their God and dishonoring The Lord.

    Khamenei is pro-life. Conservatives often criticize him for his policies towards Israel, and the repression against his own people. Ergo, conservatives are upholding libertarianism as their God and dishonoring The Lord.

    The pro-life issue is very important, and should not be abandoned. It is important to fight for pro-life causes and for pro-life politicians. It is not the only issue out there, and it is possible to find someone who is both pro-life, and who understands and respects limited government and other issues of importance to conservatives. One does not need to be a libertarian to appreciate this distinction, and in fact Erick is not a libertarian.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    In Exodus 9:1: “Then the LORD said to Moses, ?Go in to Pharaoh and say to him, ?Thus says the LORD, the God of the Hebrews, ?Let my people go, that they may serve me.” We often here the directive to let my people go but we often forget the reason why “that they may serve me”. It is impossible to serve God and serve a coercive, overbearing government. I say libertarian for the most part in that if there is a conflict between evangelical christian and libertarian – I’ll be an evangelical christian, first and foremost. I haven’t had too many of those conflicts.

    As for Rick Santorum…true story…we all know all the LSM has to do throw Santorum off is to mention the words birth and control right after each other, so my wife asks me so “is the choice to be between one guy who wants me broke and a ward of the state and another who wants me pregnant.” She is as pro-life a gal as you would ever want to me; sings in two church choirs. I find the teachings of Christ and a belief in small government to be wholly consistent.

    PS: The wife would have voted for the dude who wanted her pregnant (against Obama), she was just hoping for another choice.

  • shadowbear12

    In reading through here again, I’m not really seeing where anyone is criticizing pro-life. I am new here, and may be missing some subtleties and context. At least for me though, I am definitely pro-life. It’s off topic of this thread, but I don’t see how anyone can be a conservative or constitutionalist and not be pro-life. Clearly protecting life is one of the very few and very clear purposes of the Federal Government. Unless it can be proven that a human fetus is neither human nor alive, we are obligated to protect him or her. Also, and I think a critical point that is never discussed is that being a citizen capable of living in a constitutional republic demands high cultural standards and tolerating abortion fosters the opposite.

    I think the point of this thread is a criticism of statist politicians whose power is based on appealing to specific passions to get elected and then working the social ropes to sustain their positions. I think this is on target where we need to focus thought. The current state of our nation is not because of Obama or extreme leftists. They need to go for sure, but much of the huge Federal bureaucracy that is now crushing us was either built by Republicans directly, or tolerated by them. Tolerating shabby leadership and agenda-driven education has made it possible for the extreme left to gain power. Looking back I can see where I, and many of the leaders I supported have culpability too. Federal programs and infrastructure only ever grow, and worse, the power gets passed into the wrong hands. I believe we need everyone who identifies with conservatism to focus on real leadership and what can be done about that.

  • duncer

    Many republicans, and before obama care some democrats, chose to hold themselves forward as being pro life knowing that Roe vs Wade was not going to ever come up for a vote. They would trot out their public position every time they took a vote that called their real principles to question as a yah, but i am pro-life free pass. Obamacare exposed people like Stupak as long term liars and now no democrat has any credibility on the issue. Maybe it is too much to expect politicians to have real integrity rather than poses.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Jacobson get2djnow

    Bomb throwing might be fun on one of those other blogs, but it’s inappropriate here. If you have a point it might be worth reading. If you think that EE has fallen into some Lefty trap that might be worth reading as well, but your post stinks. And, btw, who is Liddell? Did Donna tell you to spell Dr. Keadle’s name incorrectly?

  • eldstenorge

    This is exactly what needed to be said. You said it so much better than I did. Appreciated. We just need to quit, always, criticizing each other, especially when we agree on most things. Just because someone does not agree 100% does not make them the enemy. “Political differences never justify hatred or ill will.”

  • groverc

    As a Christian, I believe no individual, no party, no nation deserves to succeed if he/she/it is NOT pro-life. Therefore, Erick, you should have mentioned that Mr. Keadle is pro-life and, by the way, ALSO not a statist.
    I ran to his website after seeing your post, since the implication was that that Scott Keadle was some libertarian humanist right-to-kill-God’s-children type (like John Stossel). But, his stance on abortion is as follows: “Life is a gift from God that begins at conception. Protecting life is a duty of any legitimate government.”
    Okay, then. He’s met Qualification ONE. Now we can go on to all that other good Conservative stuff Mr. Keadle represents so nicely.

  • ihateliberals

    If we continue to keep “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”. Why can’t we get it through our thick Conservative Skulls that Career politicans aren’t in it for us. Most of them are lawyers and don’t have our well being in mind only their power. Please make sure in November that the right people get to DC not just becasue they got that bridge built foryour community. Look at what they are doing for the country not just for yur district.

  • gmhunt

    Cantor is a RINO, he works for the Republican Party agenda, NOT the American people…..the people of N. Carolina must be careful not to vote “party” when electing their representatives…..just look a Rubio, he became a “party” guy the day after the Tea Party helped him get elected with his “Dream Act”……….anyone Cantor wants to elect, the people should vote for the other person………Cantor, Boehnor, McConnell, need to be replaced, we need “Real” Constitutional Conservatives in the House & Senate Leadership positions NOT RINO’s……….

  • celador2

    I too have wondered how a poster gets a diary. I see no Create Diary link on the page. Most the time all I do is comment but when see so many diairies I wonder do they know something I do not?

    What is the diary procedure step by step?

  • hayekwasright

    Nt

  • westcoastpatriette

    the way to request a diary is to click on “My Profile” at top of the page. Then to the right of your profile name, click edit. Then at the top left of the page you will see “Request Diary” and click on that. Then you have to wait for approval.

  • ironmike76

    … As “pro-life” wasn’t even mentioned in the body until referencing Cantor in the last line. I can tell you: the “pro-life” part got MY attention. I can tell you how I “felt” when I saw the title: it immediately pissed me off. After reading some of the comments, however, some of my faith in conservatives has been restored. Criticizing “social conservatives” (as if social conservatism is exclusive of fiscal conservatism) isn’t wise. For those who can’t see the connection between our amoral/immoral society and the economic mess we’re in: you must have closed your eyes. BTW: I’m Catholic and disagree with many sharing my faith on “social justice” and government’s role in it. That said, it’s up to government to reinforce the concept of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” without enforcing “religion.” When you figure out how to do that politically, give me a call.

  • celador2

    I may do that diary request in the future. I post as the spririt moves me in comments and some are quite long.

  • westcoastpatriette

    since the wait for approval can be so long. Then it will be there when you want it. But, then, I could mind my own business, too. :)

  • celador2

    Better get moving. It will be there when i want it.

  • celador2

    I requested the diary but had none to post. My request was successful but the diary needs be approved. If I ever write one that is the process.

  • gawken

    I thought they learned their lesson in 2010, after Cornyn and the RSCC spent $$ in Charlie Crist, and a few other races, like Tenn. Didn’t they forswear and pinkie promise to never, NEVER do it again…that they would stay out of primaries?

  • acat

    http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/photos/images/newsfeed/000/158/641/haters%20gonna%20hate.gif?1312608498

    They look foolish, no?

    Mew

  • acat

    They look foolish, no?

    Mew

  • emptybucket

    thank you patriette. we probably both enjoy the Book of Proverbs also. Sure wish some of our elected officials would quit giving lip service to their “faith” and really begin a journey with God. That is probably the only way to turn this country back around.

  • westcoastpatriette

    I love all of scripture but especially Proverbs and Psalms.

    Contrary to what many people think, the writers and actors depicted in the Bible were regular folks like us acquainted with suffering, tragedy and triumph. In my darkest hours, our loving Heavenly Father always finds a way to get His love and concern through to me….if only I will quiet myself and listen.

    In the aftermath of the Supreme Court betrayal, we could all use some comforting and hope right now. I’m glad my scriptures lifted your spirits.

  • emptybucket

    just sit and wait, and listen. Jan 1 2012 there were 40 people at our church who joined us in reading the Bible in an entire year. The response has been incredible. Everyone, just everyone has commented on how it has been a positive in their lives. It is a program that takes you to 7 different areas of the Bible each week. Once you get used to it, wow. There are several “old-timers” who have said they are finding things they knew were in the Bible but didn’t know where. To have 40 people in a small group all reading together has strengthened each one of us.

    I am convinced that the United States needs to get themselves back to God being the first thing in their lives, then family, then job….

  • rabun1016

    I looked at his candidacy when someone else wrote an article supporting it a couple months ago, and at that time, nothing was on his website. That gave some of us pause and aroused some comments on where he stood. Glad to see he has now published that as his position.

  • morstar150

    I understand that it is not the driving issue of this campaign, but it is an issue that demonstrates the dismantling of constitutional values through judicial activism.

    That is as important as any politician you want to back simply because he fits your criteria. This shaving off of worthy candidates because they don’t fit squarely in the mold is not going to accomplish our main and ONLY goal, to get rid of Obama and the Democrat Senate, and retain the House majority.

    We need to WIN! However we accomplish that goal. That’s why I support that knucklehead Romney! The alternative is too costly!

  • JSobieski

    The USSR was anti-abortion. Some pro-lifers are of no help to us.