« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Morning Briefing for July 17, 2012

RS MB CleanMasthead

RedState Morning Briefing

July 17, 2012

Go to www.RedStateMB.com to get
the Morning Briefing every morning at no charge.

———————————————————————-

1. Karen Handel Will Be At the RedState Gathering. Will You?

Karen Handel was the second candidate, behind Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, to get a RedState endorsement in 2009 at our first RedState Gathering.

This year, she will join us in Jacksonville. Karen was the Secretary of State of Georgia before running for Governor of that state. She didn’t make it in that race, but went on to the Susan G. Komen Foundation where she led the fight to end Komen funding Planned Parenthood.

Karen, who had been attacked in the gubernatorial race as not sufficiently pro-life, was willing to lose her job at Komen over funding Planned Parenthood.

At this year’s RedState Gathering, we’ll hear from her and honor her hard work. Time is almost out. Go to www.redstategathering.com to register. I hope to see you there. The event will be in Jacksonville, FL on August 2nd through the 5th.

Please click here for the rest of the post.

2. Ted Cruz Outraises David Dewhurst. Dewhurst Reponds By Accusing Cruz of Supporting Pedophiles.

I have always had a lot of respect for the guys who are running David Dewhurst’s campaign, but I’m starting to see now why Rick Perry had no chance of getting elected President. The same team running Dewhurst’s campaign ran Perry’s Presidential campaign and has stooped to what I thought would be an impossible low.

Contra the headline at CNN.com, David Dewhurst actually raised less money than Ted Cruz. Dewhurst had to pump over $4 million into his campaign to save face and win the media spin that he outpaced Cruz. In fact, Cruz has raised $1.7 million and Dewhurst raised $1.5 million.

So now Dewhurst’s campaign team is accusing Ted Cruz of supporting pedophiles, going so far as to try to tie him to Jerry Sandusky.

Not. Kidding.

Please click here for the rest of the post.

3. Taxpayers Fund White House’s Race-based Direct Mail

President Barack Obama’s delusions of grandeur, his Constitutional misconceptions and his petty racial politics mesh seamlessly in this recently uncovered letter, sent from the White House to an unknown number of recipients for rather dubious reasons.

Please click here for the rest of the post.

4. Law of the Sea Treaty Dead

Three conservative cheers for Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Kelly Ayotte (R–N.H.) for announcing critical opposition to the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). The LOST is a treaty being pushed by the Obama administration that would bind the U.S. to decisions of a United Nations-sanctioned governing body of the world’s oceans. Conservatives worry that U.S. Senate ratification of the Treaty would lead to an attack on American sovereignty.

Thanks to the announced opposition of these two senators, there are now 34 publicly pledged votes against LOST. To pass a treaty in the Senate, the treaty needs a 2/3rds vote or 67 senators if all vote. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) has circulated a letter with 31 senators pledged to vote no on the treaty. Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) has a statement on his website saying that he will also vote no bringing the number to 32. Add in Portman and Ayotte, and then you have 34 votes against the treaty.

Please click here for the rest of the post.

5. Eight Years of RedState

July 11, 2004, was actually the first live day of RedState with the actual site kicking off July 12th with user content. We went live on Scoop without the logo.

Please click here for the rest of the post.

COMMENTS

  • acat


    Story over at Ace of Spades ..

    I can’t help but think the #OWSers and their Dem fellow travelers are echoing an older vibe …

    Mew

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    He’s tough….Bain Capital just makes money which to the left makes them EEEEEEEEVILE.

  • commonsenseobserver

    And define the fight on his own terms. Right now, he’s in a very defensive posture.

  • APA Guy

    Arguing day and night trying to define Bain is a losing proposition. No one gives a rip about Bain. Americans care about persistent high gas and food prices, lack of job growth, and the general economic malaise that has gripped the country.

    Romney needs to steer away from unsavory issues like Reagan did back in the day. He needs to hit Obama fast and furious (sorry…couldn’t resist) on ECONOMY, ECONOMY, ECONOMY. Obama has given him plenty of ad material these past few weeks…time to use it and define the election narrative as being about THE ECONOMY for the next four months.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Would only seem… natural if Romney appears to have the record and plans to fix it. Right now, Obama is trying to hide that fact so that he can stay on as the devil Americans know. Start by laying out Obama’s failures, his hypocrisy and lies, and then going on to praise Romney’s record and his plan to get America working again. Business experience is definitely not supposed to be unsavoury, or we should just surrender to Obama now.

    The idea is, since we’re already spending money hitting back at Obama on Bain, divert some of the money from attack ads to positive ads showing the good Romney did.

    Like this one:

    But it’ll be even better if Romney speaks personally near the end.

  • APA Guy

    Obama is trying to get Romney to swing at pitches in the dirt. Romney is far too smart to fall for such a tactic, but PACs can spend all the money they want calling Obama a liar. That way, the public gets to see Obama undressed while Romney’s hands stay clean.

    By the way, don’t EVER say the word “surrender” where this fight with Obama is concerned. If you want to quit, go home alone because no one here will join you.

  • commonsenseobserver

    And it should never be regarded as a negative for him. Accepting that would be akin to surrender.

    Talking about swinging at pitches in the dirt, what do you think Mitt has been doing so far? Now’s the time to clean off the dirt after knocking out the defecating squirrel.

  • commonsenseobserver

    It only reinforces the contrast and makes any arguments against Obama’s “story” much more convincing and easier to swallow.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    He has said he is proud of the work they did at Bain; Obama’s team is lying (literally he called them liars); the only people in every polling that has been done that care about Bain are liberal Democrats who aren’t going to believe or understand Romney anyway; Romney just needs to reproduce the commercial where he hits Obama on unemployment. The mainstream media is never going to say “asked and answered”.

    The thing people miss about swing voters is they are the most brutal meritocracy in American life. They don’t care about Romney’s old job or Romney’s old taxes; they do care about their job and their taxes. Romney needs to go back to that and point out Obama doesn’t want to talk about it. Gillespie’s angst wasn’t in saying that Bain/taxes had moved voters – it moved the narrative from Obama for the equivalent of a day.

    Eventually, Obama will have to defend or find someone to blame for his record especially as the election grinds closer to election day. You will know the election is in the home front when Obama and his Chicago thugs attack Congress Critters – that is the one attack Romney has to be ready for because it is the one on which he could lose the election.

    Romney’s mistake was in not saying some version off: “This is just another example of Barack Obama’s inability to focus on anything but keeping his job. Really with 5.7 million Americans out of work for 6 months or more, 12% real unemployment, shouldn’t Barack Obama’s focus be on your jobs not keeping his job or any of my old jobs. Eyes on the ball, people; eyes on the ball.” Americans get it even if Chicago thugs and main stream media ho’s don’t.

  • APA Guy

    The economy is his Achilles heel. Have you given any thought as to why Obama wants so badly to talk about Bain…Romney’s dog…heck, ANYTHING except the economy?

    One can tout one’s business record without getting into a slop fight with a desperate loser. Romney can tout his job and wealth creating prowess within the scope of defining Obama’s failures. THAT is called going on the offensive. What you are suggesting is, by definition, a defensive move that allows the narrative to be changed from Obama’s crappy economy to Mitt Romney.

    We win this election by pinning Obama’s economic record to his vest…then stapling it to his head. At that point, Romney will be in a fine position to put forth his plans to restore our economic greatness.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Team Romney didn’t.

    In fact, all of those, if done correctly, would complement one another. Obama’s record, Romney’s experience, Romney’s plan, Obama distractions and lack of a plan.

    I feel sorry for Obama at times. When you don’t have a record to run on, you paint your opponent as someone people should run from. It’s quite sad, given that he had the potential to break down barriers and instead ended up making them higher and thicker.

  • commonsenseobserver

    “Romney can tout his job and wealth creating prowess within the scope of defining Obama?s failures.”

    Um, but has Team Romney been following the first part?

    Not that you would care, you seem to think that your own words are a losing strategy.

    No offense meant. :P

  • APA Guy

    …which is precisely why Obama is trying to bait Romney into wasting time and money on a useless issue.

    NO ONE CARES ABOUT BAIN…period…end of story. It only becomes a campaign issue if Romney falls into the trap and allows the campaign narrative to drift from Obama’s crappy economy to Bain…which, again, NO ONE CARES ABOUT.

  • commonsenseobserver

    If this is part of a bigger picture about the contrast between Roaring Romneynomics and the Ouch-bamanomics.

    The point is, Team Mitt and the Gov. seem to want to change the subject without actually being able to do that…

  • APA Guy

    “When you don?t have a record to run on, you paint your opponent as someone people should run from.”

    Your words.

    So, given the fact that Obama is desperately trying to run from his record, you advocate…changing the narrative to Romney and Bain?

    I’m really trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here, but you seem to be parroting the Democrat talking points on Bain. They want Romney to do EXACTLY what you are saying he should do. Does that not give you the least little bit of pause?

  • APA Guy

    You want Romney to put out ads clarifying…again…how Obama is distorting his Bain record.

    I’m telling you here and now…it doesn’t matter if Romney puts out a thousand ads clarifying his record on Bain. Obama will continue to lie about Romney’s private-sector record to the end of time…no matter how often the lie is refuted.

    Romney’s only chance in this election is to put Obama’s terrible record front-and-center…then lay out a plan to bring the nation back from economic malaise. If he addresses Bain or any of the other ridiculous charges from Obama’s people, he changes the narrative away from the Obama economy and is doomed.

  • APA Guy

    If you want a bigger picture contrast, look no further than their views on taxes and businesses. Obama says that businesses only succeed because of the government and owe them more taxes. Romney credits the American business and wants to tax them less.

    Bain makes the narrative about BAIN, not defining differences. With all due respect, you are falling right into Obama’s trap.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Whether Romney appears to have succeeded at clarifying his Bain tenure so far, with his current strategy?

    Also, whether Romney’s criticisms and plans would be a lot more credible if voters believed that he had actual experience turning businesses, the Olympics, and government around, and really succeeded at that?

    But I understand the importance of the big picture as well- Obama’s economy must be at the forefront. Everything else is just to help us expose and define that.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Right?

    The big picture can be reinforced by smaller elements pieced together, that’s what I’m saying.

  • acat

    Serious question. What do you want Romney to say?

    Redirecting back to the top of this thread, my thought is Romney’s better off letting Bain soak up some #OWS anger ..

    The further down the Bane road #OWS goes – I agree with the conclusion in the Ace of Spades article I linked, these coddled teenagers with lousy social skills really do want a revolution – the more they alienate the squishy middle, eh?

    Let’s give it a little longer.

    Mew

  • APA Guy

    Most of the public doesn’t know what the hell Bain does, nor do they have any desire to understand it. It’s a losing topic any way you slice it.

    With Bain, you call out lies and correct the record…then move on. Romney has done that. To allow the issue to linger would be to allow it to dominate the narrative.

    Plus, remember this:

    When the debates roll around, it will be Obama’s record versus Romney’s qualifications for president. That will be a perfect time for Romney to school Obama creating wealth and jobs…with no lying ads to save Obama’s skin. If Obama lies on national television, Romney calls him on it…in front of tens of millions of voters. Running competing ads just looks like brothers and sisters arguing over who gets the remote control to the Wii…it’s an exercise in futility.

    Romney is smart and disciplined. There is no way he will allow Obama to run from his record, just like he disallowed Newt to run from his Fannie/Freddie associations. Remember, Newt tried this Bain attack garbage too. How did that work out for him in the end?

    I see no reason to change strategy at this point. Romney is basically in a dead heat with Obama. If the election was held tomorrow, Romney would win by 4-5 points because 90% of undecided voters break for the challenger historically. Romney has just started ripping Obama for his record.

  • PowerToThePeople

    I can not remember the actual numbers, but a few polls showed a vast majority of the populace trust Romney with the future of our economy, not Obama. If I remember correctly, it was close to 65/35.

    You are correct, Bain means little except to those who hate Republicans in the first place. The majority of the country will be looking for the guy they can trust to lead us out of this funk and Obama is being seen as a complete failure.

  • APA Guy

    Obama is doing the heavy lifting with his stupid comments about taxes and businesses. Why not just loop his stupid comments over and over in ads attacking him on his record?

    Bain…Bain…Bain…it’s all you ever see on leftist blogs and media…with NO mention of the economy.

    Gee, I wonder why?

    Actually, I don’t wonder..I KNOW. I have seen enough of these elections to know precisely why someone like Obama is running the ads he is running. He is SCARED STIFF right now that his terrible economy is being exposed for the country to see…and he wants a diversion. Romney isn’t giving it to him…and thank God for that.

  • commonsenseobserver

    All of you, including Mr. Cat. :) \

    As for PTTP, you should check out the latest swing state polls from purple strategies and Rasmussen.

  • APA Guy

    …and Romney is ahead +3 in the national polling, with Obama’s JAR at 46%. I can count on zero fingers how many sitting presidents win reelection with a JAR below 50%, so what’s your point?

  • commonsenseobserver

    Is to attack Bain so that Romney looks like a worse devil on both “policy” and “stories”. It may work now, but should wear off before we’re in Tampa, or, in fact, much earlier, with Mitt at the Olympics at all.

  • PowerToThePeople

    should ignore Bain is simple, it is a useless waste of time.

    Let me explain with a stupid example:

    Romney: I have been a very successful business man who translated that skill into a successful term as Gov where I lowered the debt and created a ton of jobs.

    Obama (Bain) But your hair looks fake, you suck, and your are out of shape.

    At this point Romney has a choice to continue showing the people he can help get this country out of its many problems or can take the time to stop saying what needs to be said and respond to the “You are fat” comment. Once he enjoins Obama in the type of conversation, he loses. As long as he can stay above the fray, point to the many failures of Obama, and explain how he will do it different, he wins. Even assuming a majority of people see Bain as a bad thing for Obama, they still see the multitude of problems with the Obama rule and they desperately want to know how we can fix it via Romney.

    Obama is not stupid, he knows his own poll numbers, he has read how the populace trusts Romney over him on almost every major issue, he know he must divert the conversation away from him, and he knows if Romney does not take the bait, he is done.

    Romney is the crossroads for us. If he wins and does even a decent job, we hold the Whitehouse for the next 20 years. If he fails to win or turns out lousy, we lose it for at least the next 20. Not to mention what repercussions it will have on the Congress. Romney MUST stick to Obama and his failures, not Bain.

  • commonsenseobserver

    As Rasmussen shows.

    Meanwhile, the Virginia and Colorado figures on “Obama is unable improve the economy” vs “Romney couldn?t do a better job improving the economy” are far too close than Romney deserves with his excellent leadership in private equity. The impact of ads is also shocking, but should wear off with time.

  • PowerToThePeople

    just wrong. There is no upside to rehashing Bain as a Romney explanation will not convince one person one way or the other. But telling people how Romney will succeed where Obama has failed miserable will win this election.

  • PowerToThePeople

    of how people are thinking right now, for the most part they are not to be trusted one way or the other. Too far out, too little involvement, and people really do not want to discuss political elections in July. Outside of the scared left who will do anything to convince themselves and the world Obama is a lock to win, polls will only become more accurate closer to the election.

    You will see more accurate numbers after Romney announces a VP, although of course it will be the polls done a few days out after the excitement wears off.

    You will see more accurate polls as the economy remains bad come September and October.

    You will see more accurate polls once Obama makes his pious “I am great, things are great, the things that are bad are Bush’s fault” speech at the Democratic convention.

    Right now the polls do show how much trouble Obama is in, but they really do not reflect actual poll numbers.

  • commonsenseobserver

    And Bain is the evidence. I mean, Obama’s looking at it without context, which is why it’s worked. Taken in context, with Olympics and MA, Romney has a consistent record of success, which makes it very difficult for Obama to spin any one element if we piece all of them together to make the case for the Gov.

    It’s not that Obama’s ads will work, which I think they won’t, but that Mitt will shy away from using Bain and others to convince Americans that he’s the guy for the job, to renew America’s economy and restore American values.

  • APA Guy

    I never thought I’d say this, but THANK GOD Romney isn’t as stupid as some conservatives are right now. I swear, they’d get into a fight over a stick of gum to prove they were right about something…even if that fight took place in front of their boss and it meant getting fired.

    Romney will win this campaign with BRAINS, not B***S. I wish some on our side would get that through their thick heads. There is a reason they want to pick a fight about Bain. Only someone who wants to hand this election to Obama would want Bain to be the issue instead of the economy.

  • westcoastpatriette

    and he is only charged with a misdemeanor.

    http://www.pe.com/local-news/breaking-news-headlines/20120716-dispatcher-killed-other-driver-had-two-dui-arrests.ece

  • APA Guy

    So a few idiot writers and pundits bleat about Bain. So what?

    Ask the common voter (and I have…ad nauseum here in Indiana) what they think about Bain. They don’t even know what the hell Bain is…not a clue.

    What they DO know is they are paying way too much for gas and food…and that there are far too few jobs, which were promised by Obama.

    Hit him there…over…and over…and over again…then watch him fall like a deck of cards. THAT is a winning “rebuttal” to the Bain attacks.

  • acat

    We’re quite far out yet, Romney hasn’t announced his veep, nor really started his appeal to the squishy middle …

    This isn’t a sitcom, it won’t be wrapped up in 30 minutes.

    Mew

  • acat

    Sandwiches on multiple airline flights contain needles

    The TSA is like putting a shiny new lock on the front door of your house, but leaving the back door standing open.

    Mew

  • commonsenseobserver

    But that Bain can help Romney on the economy.

  • PowerToThePeople

    at trying to enlighten people. People are going to have to accept the fact that Romney will do this election his way, not the way others feel he should. They must learn he is an extremely intelligent guy who has the drive to be president. His work ethics is second to none, and he will do what it takes to win. He knows responding to diversionary tactics is the wrong way to go, so he will not do it.

  • acat

    We do not agree that Bain will matter, nor do we agree that tiny polling shifts this far out matter, nor do we agree that Romney should pivot and get defensive about this.

    Romney’s approach, letting Obama’s rhetoric excite the #OWSers, is the least bad course.

    Mew

  • PowerToThePeople

    eventually about this major problem, but only after a major politician’s family member is the one laying the cold slab. Someone like Reid and it is only after he is mourning the loss will things start to move towards a fix.

    Until then, they will continue to proclaim they are like Jesus because they allow the criminal element (illegals) to stay here and continue to come here.

  • PowerToThePeople

    you will see a landslide victory for Romney and in Congress. The current poll numbers do not show the real race and only really reflect the serious trouble the Obama campaign is in.

  • APA Guy

    …but I am in this case because I watched Romney dispatch Gingrich with this measured approach, and now we want him to change strategy because this is Obama and we want him beaten down NOW.

    Patience is a virtue for a reason :)

  • westcoastpatriette

    I’ll have to remember that the next time I fly.

    Wonder who’s working in those kitchens?

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    but they have a lot interest in their jobs and their taxes. Talk about that and school choice and debt – the American voter (well the 55% who are liberal marxist) gets it even if Obama, his Chicago thugs, and his media crack ho’s don’t (and I apologize to the ladies on RedState but at this point I can’t think of a more accurate term for them).

  • JSobieski

    by what they see as a relatively substantance free/generic campaign.

    The “gettable independents” want to know more about what the candidates actually plan on doing.

    I am not so much concerned about Romney winning as I am about Romney having a meaningful victory—a mandate to things that will otherwise not be possible to do.

    For example, if Romney doesn’t talk somewhat specifically on medicare reform at some point, it won’t happen in 2013 any more than SS reform happened in 2005. W’s SS reform didn’t even make it out of committee in 2005.

  • APA Guy

    …and one I understand entirely. It’s really difficult and frustrating to see him criticize Obama while at the same time saying NOTHING about what he will do differently.

    That having been said, there is infinite wisdom in waiting to release such details to the voting public…like:

    1. The earlier Romney releases his economic plans, the sooner Dems begin tearing into him…including the MSM. There is no reason to give them extra time to nitpick anything unless you are a glutton for punishment…and Romney isn’t.

    2. The American public has an extremely short attention span. Giving them information in July doesn’t necessarily mean they will retain it in November…and Romney will spend tens of millions trying to remind them of the details of his economic plan when that money can be better spent attacking Obama in the weeks leading to the election.

    3. Reagan spoke in generalities for much of his 1980 campaign. He spoke of America’s greatness, diminishing government, lowering the tax burden, etc., but he hardly ever got into specifics until the debate. I see no reason why that strategy wouldn’t win this time around.

    I used to underestimate Mitt Romney…then I watched him destroy Newt Gingrich, both on the trail and on the debate dais, when I never though such a victory was possible. He’ll take Obama out in due time…bank it.

  • commonsenseobserver

    But voters don’t know about it. I look forward to when the time will be ripe for Romney to start pushing his alternative vision vigorously.

    But I still believe that Bain won’t hurt Romney- it’s not something he should be scared of, or view as a distraction, but something he should exploit to his advantage.

  • APA Guy

    Seriously…you need to stop. Almost every comment from you is about Bain, and I’m beginning to question your motives when you won’t let it go.

    Bain is a losing issue…a distraction. It will never be a positive for Romney because no matter how many ads Romney runs explaining Bain, Obama will double down and run the same lies.

    In other words, Romney gains NOTHING by talking about Bain. I don’t know how much clearer I can make that for you.

  • JSobieski

    so I wouldn’t be impressed so much with Romney’s dismantling of Newt.

    Offense and defense are different skills. Newt’s lengthy career of avoiding unexpressed thoughts made him quite easy to take out. When coupled with his inability to put up a vigorous defense (he could have come up with a better strategy for dealing with his consulting firm), he was an easy target.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Have moved on from Bain anyway, they are now obsessed with Romney’s taxes. Romney gives the reasonable answer that he isn’t all that enthusiastic about providing Obama’s thugs the opportunity to lie and distort his taxes to avoid talking about his record. Of course to crack ho’s and thugs, this means Romney is hiding something. I’ll have more up today in another “I read politico” column.

    What Romney should do is look right in the camera and say…

    “Obama’s campaign wants my taxes so they can dig around my personal life and lie and distort it to avoid talking about his Presidency. Last time I released my taxes, Robert Gibbs accused me of money laundrying money in the Cayman Islands and Stephanie Cutter called me a felon. If I invested in a German Brewery in 1997, those clowns will have call me a Nazi outsourcer and a drunk to boot. Call me crazy but I don’t think the Presidency should be contended in the gutter. Tell you what though, I’ll make Obama a deal; if he releases every Fast and Furious document the Congress asks for now and in the future; I’ll release 10 years of tax returns. I suspect those documents are a lot more embarassing about how Barack Obama has conducted his White House than what my taxes reveal how I’ve conducted my personal life.”

  • commonsenseobserver

    Apparently, they invested in a fund that does precisely that, if not outright offshoring.

  • acat

    Once again, needles in sandwiches.

    The last batch popped up on July 17th .. I wonder if this is from the same batch….

    I’ll pass on the in-flight meal, thanks.

    Mew