« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Not Enough

Just under a month ago, I wrote

Of all the people to not be beating up Mitt Romney for his present not quite stellar campaign, I find myself in that position.

I’m genuinely not that worried.

I am still not worried, but I am getting concerned. This election is trending away from Romney as the economy deteriorates and more Americans believe the economy is getting worse. That should be a red flag for the GOP.

Romney 2012 donationpage vpbumperDuring the month of June, Barack Obama had a terrible month. Since then, he has continued to make some serious flubs. But through it all, Team Romney has really failed to capitalize on those stumbles and Romney has had a bad month himself. His message has not broken.

He tried an international trip and timed it during the opening ceremonies of the Olympic Games. It got little attention except for his own missteps.

Today, he announced a very bold pick in Paul Ryan. This forces the message to be about the economy and our long term future. It is a fight worth having and one we can win. But I am less and less confident that Team Romney, as presently constituted, can win that fight.

Picking Paul Ryan must be the beginning of a campaign shake up, not the end.

Consider that in all the polling in August, from Gallup to CNN to Fox News, Barack Obama is ahead. You can take issue with one or two of the polls, but the trend is consistent.

Another trend is consistent.

Mitt Romney continues to outperform Barack Obama on key issues like the economy, jobs, and the national debt — the very issues the campaign is about, yet he is still behind.

Part of it is the summer doldrums. Part of it is Romney not having a lot of money to spend until officially accepting the Republican nomination. But a good part of it is Romney’s team. Several of them have been touting themselves and how awesome they are instead of the candidate. Let’s not forget the Stu Stevens hagiography. Eric Fehrnstrom and Andrea Saul have made their own missteps that have taken away from key momentum.

Today, the Romney camp sent out a talking points sheet claiming that while picking Paul Ryan, Romney had his own budget plans. This is delusional and not credible spin. You pick Paul Ryan, you defend his budget. It is that simple. That one bullet point sums up a summer of dysfunction. The Romney team seems to be believing its own spin, which can often lead to disaster.

Team Romney-Ryan has the chance for a real reboot. But it is one they need to take it. While I am not yet worried, I am concerned by the consistent propensity of Team Romney to not capitalize on Barack Obama’s missteps and to trip over their own feet when they get ahead.

Paul Ryan is not enough. Mitt Romney does need to prune and fertilizer his campaign team.

COMMENTS

  • clintonformccain

    I don’t even really understand how a Republican pundit could be so sour on the election, especially on the day that a VP candidate, who by all accounts is at least a solid choice is named.

  • evilbloggerlady
  • evilbloggerlady

    Mitt has started and managed many businesses. Ryan has an economics degree

    Barack Obama is a community organizer who has failed in dealing with the economy in four years. And Joe Biden?

  • wintermute

    when i read last night he wrote how “i plan to be asleep when its announced”. Whatever, we’re on the same team but seriously, let go of the pearls. Boy do I miss Breitbart right now.

    Im really motivated this election. We do have a seriously tough slog ahead of us but Im not going to be a concern troll.

  • evilbloggerlady

    Team Romney has not been playing to its potential. Okay. Now that has to change.

  • annas

    Stop bashing Romney. If you are really a Republican, then get on board and support our candidate. You have not said a good word about Romney since this campaign began!

  • MAGUY

    The race is tied or even Romney slightly ahead (Rasmussen) The only polls showing Mitt behind (trending away from him) are the D+9/D+12 ones. Does this mean MItt win will? not certainly but all of this “he’s losing” among the supposd pundits is BS. The europe trip was a success except for 1 small gaffe that the MSM had to twist themselves into knots to turn into a 1 day story

    It always amazes me how gop pundits like AP, EE, Kraut, etc tell us how biased the media and their polls are but then use those articles and polls to trash the GOP.

    The Ryan pick is a good one as it focuses on the economy and the budget. To interpret it as a sign of weakness is really stretching it

  • evilbloggerlady

    It is true what Erick cautions. Team Romney has been too cautious. Too defensive. Hopefully this becomes a campaign of ideas rather than a campaign of trying not to lose–because a campaign of ideas will win. You win by giving voters a positive alternative to the other candidate. It may seem old fashioned, but that is what Reagan did. Heck, that is what Obama did in 2008 (unfortunately that was all smoke and mirrors and no substance).

  • evilbloggerlady

    And then McCain’s own staff tried to hold her head under the water.

  • izoneguy

    But Paul Ryan could be!

    The only people voting for Obama are communists, welfare slubs,
    union thugs and Joe Biden.

    If Americans are so dense as to vote for Obama again after what
    he has destroyed then there is no hope for America.

    A new republic will have to be formed out of the ashes of
    what America was in that case.

  • Bill S

    He/they are going to have to execute perfectly to beat Obama. There is no room for errors, much less the unforced variety that have been perpetrated by Fehrnstrom and Saul. Those are inexcusable, and the “Republican pundits” and ALL of us need to be riding him hard to fix the flaws in his staff and in his messaging.

    He doesn’t get a free pass just because he’s the nominee. Certainly we must be supportive, but we are not “yes men”.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    McCain made a great pick last time, but it wasn’t enough. McCain’s lack of fight took him down, but his staffers took Palin down too. I actually appreciate the realism this time around. Rah rah didn’t work so well in 2008.

  • Bill S

    Can you read?

    Today, he announced a very bold pick in Paul Ryan.

    Get a clue.

  • wintermute

    and too eager to shut out the critical views. I guess I just want a solid united front to take this guy down. I shouldn’t want that so much that it gives our guy a pass on everything though. I still have trouble handling the negativity, but I suppose this is one of many reasons id be a terrible campaign manager.

  • From ME to You

    we’ve got a good quarterback and running back but the rest of the team seems a little weak and the play calling hasn’t been stellar. The team NEEDS a change in the play calling philosophy but not a change of direction.

    An incumbent president has the advantage in that ‘theoretically’ he has the nomination locked up and doesn’t have to spend his campaign money on the primaries. But now with the ticket being announced maybe the PACS and SuperPacs can get the go ahead.

  • DVPTEXFLA

    Mr. Obama has spent 100 million in the past few months (and heaven knows how much all the help from the MSM is worth) and Gallop has the race tied Rasmussen consistently has Romney ahead usually by 2-3 points….

    For the last two weeks the Olympics have occupied normal Americans..(meaning not political junkies). Now the race begins.

    As the race begins the big stories are Romney/Ryan….Team Obama caught lying…and just to help out a US Olympic runner thought he needed to celebrate winning a medal by carrying a USA flag and a Mexican flag…he is getting hammered by Mexican Americans…for carrying the Mexican flag….

    Things are looking up!

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    “Months ago, a Romney official was walking through the pluses and minuses of the various V.P. possibilities, and said at the very end of the spiel: ?Only one person on the campaign wants Paul Ryan. That?s Mitt Romney.? The two had just campaigned together, and proved to have superior chemistry.”

    Which reinforces what Erick is trying to say.

  • http://lazarusreport.blogtownhall.com/ Tom Lesser

    I couldn’t agree more with Erick. Ryan a nice pick, but unless Romney’s team is willing to hit and hit hard, attack, attack and attack every Obama lie; unless Romney’s teams drives the conversation rather than responding to Obama…no VP pick would matter.

    I’ve been ABO, Anybody But Obama. Romney wasn’t my choice, but better him then four more Obama socialist years. However, Romney must win and he cannot do so playing defense.

  • conservativemusician

    And I put more weight on polling from Rasmussen, who has consistently shown Romney ahead by 2 – 4 points the last few weeks. He is ahead by 2 today:

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

    Also (and I know I will probably draw some scorn from some citing Dick Morris), Dick Morris had an excellent analysis the other day about how far skewed the polls you are referencing have been toward the Dems:

    http://www.dickmorris.com/dont-believe-poll-propaganda/

    In addition (the gaffe from his aide aside), Romney has had some great ads and has come out swinging on the Obama “You didn’t build that…” gaffe. This gives me hope that Romney does understand what conservatives are thinking and this is also evident with the excellent Ryan pick.

    Romney is flawed, but I’m not going to look at this with a pessimistic attitude. He is our nominee and we have to all we can to get him elected.

    It is still 2 1/2 months out until election day and I am not going to be deterred by the daily fluctuations in the polling. Many are still not paying that much attention, but once things get heated up, Romney will pound Obama on the miserable economy and he won’t be able to push the “It’s all Bushes fault” theme much longer. People are tired of his excuses and his arrogance.

    I still think that Romney is going to win comfortably, so I am going to remain positive. I also still think that my dog could run the country better than Obama has, and I sense that many others feel the same.

    Buck up Erick. Thanks for the work you are doing to help turn this country around.

  • RichmondG30

    But we also need some RoundUp used on some of the McCain Campaign hangers-on.

    Playing not to lose will guarantee one outcome: a loss.

  • gmscan

    It’s bashing the D.C. “professionals” who are leaching off this campaign, just as they did McCain’s campaign. The time to bash them is NOW, not after they have lost the election. Who the hell hired Andrea Saul in the first place? I guess they were impressed by her work for McCain and Charlie Crist.

  • kentucky

    going to move the polls this early in the campaign. The race begins today, the first of three significant events (VP pick, conventions, debates) before Election Day. The race is basically tied and the data we have on undecided voters is nothing but bad news for the Dems.

    I’m nervous like everyone else, but we can’t expect Romney to peak in August and remain there for the rest of the campaign.

  • earlgrey

    would force the campaign to shake up a bit. Now I can see that they might be tempted to rest on the positive feedback from picking Ryan.

    We got an A player out there in Ryan (IMO), and I don’t want to see his talent wasted in a lackluster campaign. I hope they heed Erick’s advice.

  • fightnright

    I know that there are many, many citizens ready to work hard to elect a serious economic team for these serious times.

    (Contrast that with team ‘Romney Hood’. )

    Keep up with your lightweight administration’s focus on distractions to superficial issues, Obamites! Now *every one* of those unimportant ads will make Obama/Biden look like the amateurs they are, and Romney/Ryan MORE likely to be winners!

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    McCain picked Palin because she could do red meat excitement for the base. She’s one of the more unqualified people to run at that level in my lifetime. And yes, she’s more qualified than Obama but so’s my dead white cat.

    Ryan is the best pick I can remember – other than Cheney. He’s head & shoulders better than Palin, Gore, Quayle and Bush1. Ryan is an effective legislator and he’s a real idea guy who can translate solid, conservative ideas into workable legislation.

    Ryan is not a rah rah guy. He’s the real deal and he’s got a spine.

  • MAGUY

    Perhaps EE didn’t exactly say that but the tone was that Romney was in deep trouble and the Ryan pick was NOT ENOUGH to fix it.

    I’m sorry but when a supposed GOP pundit spouts the MSM line about the europe trips, uses CNN/Fox polls that were D+9 or worse (and torn apart on most blog sites) and harps on every Romney gaffe while giving O no attention it is hard to take him seriously.

    Also annoying that all these pundits don’t seem to grasp that a) most people don’t start paying attention until the conventions/Labor day and b) Romney can’t start spending most of his $ until the convention.

    The race is essentially tied right now. R & R will have the money and message to take this thing in November.

  • califgal

    knows things I don’t know. I don’t doubt his criticisms have a basis.

    However, from the time I first began reading this blog, I read Erik’s words–once you’ve lost, get on board to defeat the really bad guy, or zip the lips.

    Does publicizing his feelings at this point at Red State have a chance to change what he feels is a campaign staff that is lacking? If so, then I understand writing about it here.

    If not, then I don’t understand it at all. If it can’t, won’t help, then why give the enemy solace and add fire to their bellies?

    Today’s announcement of Ryan is a time for rejoicing and I don’t like the tone I hear from Erik.

  • MAGUY

    EE wanted Perry. I did too but his campaign was so horrible he even took himself well out of VP consideration.

    Not saying you have to love the Romney/Ryan ticket but to say you are a conservative and then trash R/R while giving Obama a pass and a potential 4 more years is ridiculous

  • bk

    So far it almost looks like his team thought that if they could just steamroll through the primaries the general would be a cakewalk. After all, how could Obama win with the economy in shambles?

  • renl57

    …is the last refuge of the incompetent. When an organization can’t think of any way to improve their PRODUCT they’re selling, they reorganize.

    Romney didn’t decline in the polls due to ANY missteps by Romney’s campaign team or due to any lack of organization by his campaign staff. He declined in the polls due to a nonstop campaign of character assassination by Obama, and his inability to clear his name.

    Correcting “missteps” isn’t going to get Romney to win. Having an effective response to the Dems’ character assassination is what will enable Romney to win.

    So far, Romney has done just what RedState.com wants Romney to do, and continued to stonewall on his tax returns. He’s down in the polls because Americans equate stonewalling with having something really nefarious to hide.

  • fpete13527

    Ryan is an awesome pick, in my opinion, but the Romney campaign team needs to get ten fold more rigorous. I am still vomiting from Andres Saul’s comments this week .

    Gov Romney …do you want me to go back to considering rigorous celebration and extensive empowerment to your campaign instead of just merely supporting you????

    Well it would be real simple. As I said previously, release Andrea Saul, immediately, and take on Gov. John Sununu as your senior campaign advisor…immediately!!!

    Ryan was a great pick but Sununu as campaign manager will propel me into rigorous action for you.

  • Bill S

    The article focuses on getting rid of the incompetent staffers and bad campaigning decisions.

    Another trend is consistent.

    Mitt Romney continues to outperform Barack Obama on key issues like the economy, jobs, and the national debt ? the very issues the campaign is about, yet he is still behind.

    Part of it is the summer doldrums. Part of it is Romney not having a lot of money to spend until officially accepting the Republican nomination. But a good part of it is Romney?s team. Several of them have been touting themselves and how awesome they are instead of the candidate. Let?s not forget the Stu Stevens hagiography. Eric Fehrnstrom and Andrea Saul have made their own missteps that have taken away from key momentum.

    If you have an axe to grind with Erick, get it out there. But showing yourself as an illiterate buffoon isn’t working.

  • MAGUY

    EE wanted Perry. I did too but his campaign was so horrible he even took himself well out of VP consideration.

    Not saying you have to love the Romney/Ryan ticket but to say you are a conservative and then trash R/R while giving Obama a pass and a potential 4 more years is ridiculous

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I was referring to Erick’s statement that Romney’s pick isn’t enough. The rah rah statement referred to the online punditry, not the candidates. I know you can’t stand Palin, but she was the right pick at the time. I believe Ryan is also the right pick this time. Whitewashing stuff is for Democrats. We neither need it nor want it.

  • Jack_Savage

    We saw a nitwit win in 2008 because the Greatest GOP Presidential Campaign Team Who Ever Lived acted more like a dysfunctional MTV reality show than a group who actually knew what to do. I swear to the Lord Almighty that if I became President I would strip them all of their citizenship, including John McCain.

    It seems like Romney has looked at a resume’ or two, hired like he would hire a hedge fund manager, and delegated. This group is part of the same worthless cabal who have been getting the GOP’s teeth kicked in for decades, then happily cashing the checks and dishing on each other after the campaign.

    They need to be cleaned out as much or more so than the RINOs we primaried. I have no doubt that if the money was right, they would go to work for Obama in a skinny minute, and that is the last thing we need when we are facing a battle of principle as epic as the one that faces us.

  • MAGUY

    Yes Andrea Saul made a dumb comment. In early August when nobody is paying attention. Except for the GOP blogospere it has already gone down the memory hole

    I fully agree the Romney campaign needs to be disciplined to win in November but all these people claiming the race is already over are either attention seekers or delusional

  • evilbloggerlady

    Paul Ryan is an excellent first step. It is not a solution. Romney has to stop being milquetoast and start running to win.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Not when he was running in 1980 anyway. Romney could turn out to be Reagan or Ford. Most likely he’ll be somewhere in between, but until he’s actually tested under fire we won’t know for sure. I think if Ryan has Romney’s ear, he’ll likely be more like the former than the latter. That Ryan was Romney’s preferred choice leads me to believe he’ll listen to him.

  • fightnright

    that the Romney team *chose* policy talent and brains ~because~ they intend to run a disciplined, intelligent (and as I said below) serious campaign, over a shallow one.

  • rabun1016

    Best pick in my lifetime including Cheney given his heart issues and Halliburton taint, fair or not. So much better than the other lightweights listed.

  • ctredstater

    Erick’s analysis is usually spot on to me. the “not enough” and “I’ll be asleep at 9 AM” posts seemed to me – strange.

    Congressman Ryan is far more than at least a solid choice. he is a truly superior choice. a much better choice than Ronald Reagan made.

    this shows that Governor Romney doesn’t just want to try and tap dance his way into the White House. this team will seek a referendum to govern and fix the mess the DemoRinopublicans have gotten the country into over the last several decades.

    Great Choice, Governor!!!!!

    Go Romney-Ryan!!!!!

    Begin the American Comeback!!!!!!

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    constructive criticism which EE offers (and which many of us agree with) and just being negative. The Romney campaign has made unforced errors and failed to capitalize on Obama’s which will be costly if not corrected.

    I love how folks who have made few, if any, comments before today come in and try to tell us not to point out what EE has. Probably the same ones who vote once every 4 years, think all will be solved in one election cycle and do little or nothing to help elect our candidates.

    Besides, if I wanted to read a syncophantic analysis of my candidate, I’d be a Democrat.

  • lineholder

    Obama can’t run on his record because the things he’s accomplished the American people despise. All he’s got is ugly, nasty, vicious attacks on his opponents, thrown in with a bunch of nonsensical primary-school level junk to try to distract the American public from the key issues.

    American confidence in ourselves is down. Ryan made reference to that himself. This leaves points of vulnerability for the Liberal Dems to play on in trying to persuade the public that government-dependency is the way to go. And the Dems are really good at playing on vulnerabilities, even if they lie through their teeth from beginning to end in doing it.

    It’s touch-and-go right now. It’s going to come down to a battle of ideologies.

    Romney can’t afford any self-inflicted wounds. America can’t afford for his team to have self-inflicted wounds.

    If there are members of his team who are letting their own egos get the better of them, and if it’s generating self-inflicted wounds on the Romney campaign…then they either need to get their priorities in order themselves, have someone else do it for them, or get out.

  • fpete13527

    …and I agree that the first focus on her flub was from those watching politics the closest.

    People, not involved in politics, around my area are asking why Romney is not being more energetic about his positive message and why he is not above board slam dunking Obama in the multiple ares where it is appropriate.

    Saul will give Romney a Charlie Crist loser liberal campaign in both content and context.

    I want an conservative winner campaign, not a moderate liberal squishy campaign.

    Sununu.

  • jaykali

    I just can’t help it. I think Erick thinks of himself as a motivator and I believe that he is. He is a very highly cited conservative thinker. Romneys people I am sure read what he says. But I know from my standpoint it’s pretty defeating to read how disappointed “Dad” is every time something significant happens.

    But come on Erick. Ryan is a good move for once! This is putting all your cards on the table. I like it. Let’s celebrate people!

  • jaykali

    Port,an would have been the safe choice. This is bold, I like it.

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

    We’s got who we’s got.
    Now we gets to see what they’s got.

  • jaykali

    Palin was a desperate move for sure

  • ctredstater

    Cheney-like – but more youthful and outgoing. his sunny personality and midwestern manners will play very well on the stage he is now on.

    a truly phenomenal selection by Governor Romney

  • rabun1016

    He is the guy running it and his DC company has the contract. Sadly, it is a bunch of fifty year olds who have hired a bunch of thirty year olds with mild campaign experience and given them tasks that far exceed their capability given their knowledge and limited life experience, no matter how much they profess to know. For a detailed guy, Romney seems to be disturbing distant from the campaign details. I will be the first to congratulate Stevens if he can pull it off, but there are likely volunteers out there with more experience and skills than those assembled by Stevens and co.

  • commonsenseobserver

    I think he can pull it off…

  • ctredstater

    nt

  • burke

    We need to keep the pressure on Romney. At the end of the day, Romney is still the presidential candidate. I also think it’s important to point out that Romney has a stronger personality than Ryan, and has age and experience on his side. While Ryan has come into his own of late, he spent many years under Bush voting along with the not-fiscally-conservative Bush agenda. Ryan might slip back into his get-along ways as VP. Ryan’s presence on the campaign and even in the Romney administration is not enough to get the policies that we want front and center.

    Nobody here is giving Obama a pass, and I would hope nobody intends to do anything other than vote for Romney this November, no matter what. However, without constructive criticism I honestly think that Romney’s in danger of losing this election. I’m really happy that others here agree.

  • califgal

    with Ryan–they are both data driven, not gladhanders.

    I don’t think this was a “I have to do this” choice. It’s who he really wanted.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    The best teams, the ones that know the time to celebrate isn’t until they’ve won it all, are the ones most likely to win. This win is nice, but let’s all just shake hands and get ready for the next battle.

  • califgal

    Today is cause for celebration, cohesiveness, a common purpose.

    Erik’s words last night were bitter. Not good.

  • cactusjack

    just waiting for Romney to make a big mistake on VP. He didnt, this is not a campaign-torpedoing choice. It’s a workman like choice of someone who expects a hard campaign and needs a solid hard working teammate to go the distance with him. You’ve got to admit, for some reason and I dont know why, EE has never been too enthusiastic about Romney.,

  • califgal

    team during the primaries and directly after that when he became the presumptive nominee, the ads responding to Obama’s attacks?

    Well, you all know that he couldn’t continue with those ads through June and July and part of August because of the money situation. He can’t use that hoard of money until he’s nominated. Had he been able to, things would be very different.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    And let the blame be attributed to “those failed eight years”.
    (Recall McCain’s campaign manager had scored $2 million in consulting fees from the GSEs.)

    Game over. Palin or no Palin.

    Nothing.Else.Mattered

  • califgal

    who she is, and to make you even madder, her explanation (lame as it was) of how that guy’s wife would have had health care in MA actually probably sounded good to the few women indies who were listening.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    after we’ve won the election. You see bitter. I see realism.

  • brewster

    Romney just lost the swing votes, the seniors, and women. Watch the polls continue to spread.

  • macbookben

    …on the big media story for the next few days. That’s as big a coup as you could pull off now with 3 months to go before the big day. And as far as some of this pessimism on the effectiveness of Romney’s campaign goes, just remember that all this effort is aimed at voters who generally avoid thinking about politics. We’re already in the tank for the Republicans, so the campaign is trying to persuade the undecided while keeping its integrity as a conservative movement. EE’s observation that this choice is an opportunity to reboot this campaign is correct. I think the unengaged and undecided voter will bite on the news of this announcement, and their curiosity about a new candidate will move them into a more politically oriented orbit.

  • califgal

    as I said, if offering constructive criticism on this blog helps improve the Romney team, fine.

    However, I didn’t see much in Erik’s words last night nor in his tone today that was criticism meant to be upbeat. I heard a guy who wanted to vent, didn’t quite do that, but remained hang-dog.

    Running a campaign is damn hard. Finding the right people is hard. Ask Rick Perry.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    But Romney took a very conservative turn today. Ryan as VP is going to lead to a lot of inconsistencies if Romney doesn’t follow the Conservative compass today.

    That is a very, very good thing.

  • runner12

    the references to the Fox and CNN poll, yet did not mention the Rasmussen poll that has Romney up by four. Rasmussen and Gallup are the only polls that have been polling through Obama’s Soptic ad gaffe, and Gallup has them tied.

    To be honest, I have no problem pointing out when the Romney team needs to improve. That is being realistic. But the timing is a little poor here, IMHO. But maybe EE thinks this is the time to put pressure on Team Romney to purge some bad staffers or something. I do not know.

    I will say that EE was right about the Perry people, as much as I hated to hear it at the time. I certainly hope Team Romney is listening.

  • jonrd364

    Of course I won’t. Not in a gazillion years. On the one hand, I think I understand what Erick’s doing. Motivate team Romney to cut the chaff and get with the program. On the other, however, I have to wonder about the effect it’s having on that part of the electorate that looks to Red State for news and analysis. It’s like there’s an undercurrent of “Are we SURE we want Romney?”

    There is no one else. It’s Romney or bust. Why not focus a bit more on the positives and keep the buzz on getting R&R in and Obreakourcountry out? We can deal with Romney’s foibles after the election. Honestly, the worst Romney could be is still better than the best Obama has ever been.

  • veritaseequitas

    on other comments pages, how the Romney/Ryan team is too white, not conservative enough, too conservative, not getting the female/black/hispanic vote, too wimpy, too this, too that. Is anything or anyone ever going to be good enough? Perfection is not of this world, so get over that idea. Yes, there are weak spots in the campaign that need to be taken care of and some responses that have not been what they could have been. But really, the time for criticism IS NOT NOW. The team IS Romney/Ryan and its a team that will do a great job and praise God we have them and not someone like John McCain or Bob Dole.
    We have a good chance to beat Comrade Obama. This is the time to get behind our team and get them elected not tear them down.

  • brewster

    Commenters here have been struggling to come to terms with this candidate since the primary. Their have been comments about voting for inanimate objects just to see Obama lose. It’s not about a vision for the country, it’s been sycophantic spewing of hatred for a man. Romney ‘s desire to be president ends at desire. He wanted it when Clinton and the moderate Conservative Congress left us with a surplus budget and now he wants to lead when the economy is on the tank.

  • fpete13527

    ………and that includes both Conservative women and liberal Californian women:)

  • westcoastpatriette

    is because we cannot afford to be careless or take our eye off the ball for one second or we will lose. Romney could win this if he plays it right but he will need frequent course corrections as he is not a natural nor solid conservative. That makes him tone-deaf at times wrt recognizing the severity of errors (such as the one Saul made this week.) Erick is merely trying to make those points clear before it is too late.

  • Vegas_Rick

    The Romney campaign team has been amateurish and inept at best. What Erick says here is true and needed to be said. But it could have waited a day or three. Debbie Downer is an apt description in this instance and at this time.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    only care about the crumbs they get from Obama’s table, right?

  • funwithknives

    to illustrate my approval of this post. 100 is just not sufficient.

    Consider when you speak: “…is this Productive.? Does it assist in Rendering BHO gone in any positive manner? Am I a problem or solution ? ”

    We’ve got the core we are gonna’ use.
    Ship’s leavin’. Who’s on board?

  • runner12

    It is not about a hatred for Obama, just his neo-socialist ideaology and his reckless spending.

    But keep on spewing the Lefty talking points, it is so funny when you guys do. It is so predictable.

  • runner12

    NT

  • califgal

    he picked someone ready to be a governor of an oil state, a woman who had little knowledge of NOR interest in global affairs, a woman who couldn’t identify North Korea on a map, I’d wager nor tell us what nation of people speak Farsi, etc.

    Everything Sarah Palin has done since she’s been out of office reinforces my view of her–a woman with a conservative core, but a woman who isn’t intellectually curious and so who parrots/copies the lines and the ideas she has heard spoken by Rush and Mark Levin without questioning them, a woman who loves attention. I’ve said it many times–her instincts would make her a good governor but I see no way she’d ever inspire my trust to be POTUS.

    The pic I saw of her the other day, platform shoes known by a vulgar expression, tight t-shirt with “S” on it, below the hip tight jeans, reinforces for me she’s a woman who is all about image–wants to be hip, cool, young. It wasn’t an inspiring picture but it was highly symbolic of who she wants to be.

  • clintonformccain

    The article focuses on getting rid of the incompetent staffers and bad campaigning decisions.

    Correct. That’s what EE’s article is about. And, for that to be EE’s lead article hours after the Republican nominee makes a major announcement of a solid VP pick is a Debbie Downer.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    By the way have you seen @stefcutter – I think she got JimmyHoffaed for lying on CNN and getting caught.

  • califgal

    THIS time around (as opposed to the last time he ran), the country needs an immediate change of course because that metaphorical cliff is that close, and that being POTUS for the sake of being POTUS (I think most people run for this reason), is not acceptable.

    At some point, he had to say to himself, “I need someone who is committed to a big overhaul and who can articulate that message.”

  • califgal

    tv, libs or our side, I see idiots.

  • califgal

    RE-BOOT America!

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    The speechwriter ought to either get a raise or a slap in the head for not writing a similar speech earlier. Some of the highlights:

    I have to paraphrase:

    The campaign is going to be about issues and not crawling around in the filth like the President

    The content around you didn’t build that is worse in context (which it is)

    There was lots of good stuff there…

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The Clinton fanboi club is —) thataway.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Dude, you need to get out more.

  • funwithknives

    ’nuff said.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    McCain had more than enough. It was about exciting the base, something he was never able to do. He almost won it too, due to that choice, but snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. She was never qualified, not in the traditional sense, and still isn’t. It’s too bad really, because it’s possible that she might’ve been. For the same reason I’m glad Romney didn’t pick Rubio. It would’ve been very damaging to his long-term political career.

  • cheetah2

    One of my first thoughts was Ryan will never be an embarrassment as Palin turned out to be. When Palin was picked for VP I was all excited. She gave great speeches and her values seemed to match mine. But she really was a disaster in her interviews. I’m sorry if that makes people mad but its the simple truth. She was basically unqualified and unprepared.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    I don’t like losing Ryan in the House, I don’t know who will replace him and it’s a huge loss. He provides much of the leadership the current Speaker is incapable of.

    Punditry, as we all know well, is mostly a moment’s mental masturbation.

  • ceili_dancer

    I would actually go back to what Erick said a couple of days ago, after Saul’s foot in mouth problem. More like paper training and keeping him in-line. Also, like Erick, I agree that the pick of Ryan is not the end, but just the beginning.
    If you can envision it as a football game , we are still in the first quarter down by 17 and with the Ryan pick it was a quick touchdown. After the PAT we are still down by 10 and we have three quarters still to go. Third quarter starts at the convention and then the real game begins. :)

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The way to make change is to wait until nobody’s listening.

    Brilliant!

  • winning2012
    Romney shows he’s committed to conservatives by making a bold choice for his VP with Paul Ryan, and Erick can’t wait to run it down because he’s still mad Rick “Dewhust” Perry didn’t get the nomination.

    How dare the grassroots not take their marching orders from the great Erick Erickson!

    It’s sick Erick so badly wants to give Obama 4 more years just so he can say
    “I told you so.” That’s not a true conservative, that’s a self-centered child having a temper tantrum.

  • califgal

    OUR COUNTRY!

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    But he’s a good choice. We lose something no matter who is chosen. And the House leadership hasn’t really supported Ryan’s ideas anyway.

    As for punditry, the same thing could be said for our comments here (and would probably be true).

  • Bill S

    …tells me you’re either a retread or a coward…or a European whose opinion we don’t care about.

    In either case – buh-bye.

  • jonrd364

    I understand the point. I just think about the many nameless, non-posting visitors who see these types of things and interprets them as weakness on the part of the electorate. The (and I hate to say this) “sheeple” that aren’t as politically aware as some and tend to rely on the expertise of people like Erick (and Rush, and Hannity, and Levin, etc.) to make their decisions.

    Heck, I like to think of myself as pretty up to speed and even *I* get those twinges of doubt. Like others have said, it’s a downer. I don’t disagree with the substance of posts like this. I just get an uneasy feeling about the timing and presentation.

  • Bill S

    …and it would have described your entire presence at Redstate.

  • pdawk

    Should be linked on the front page on every conservative website. He was on fire and that speech was convention worthy.

  • Vegas_Rick

    Most of the rest of us are ready to re-engage. Your snark adds little to the discussion.

  • ctredstater

    I generally love Erick’s take on almost anything. but when he has gone from commentator to inside baseball campaign manager he loses me. He did with my candidate, Perry – “demanding” that certain people – people I had never heard of, be fired.

    I just don’t have any way to evaluate this kind of commentary. I follow developments as carefully as I can, but I am not privvy to the personalities and maneuverings of campaign staffing issues.

    For me, today was what I hope is the real beginning of the American Comeback. When I think of all the choices that Romney could well have made that would have been a disappointment, this choice is pure joy.

    True red state followers read this blog all the time, so I don’t buy the argument that it was necessary to vent this today. I think that the public spanking, if it was to come at all, could well have been held off until mid-week coming up. But it doesn’t really detract from my enthusiasm for the ticket – or my increased respect for Governor Romney for a great choice!

  • califgal

    knowledgeable about the world since then, my friend.

    On top of that, other than myself in one high school sophomore English class when required to write an in-class essay on a topic about which I knew nothing, I’ve never seen a person consistently seek to sound “smart” by using as many redundancies, repetitions, and hackneyed expressions as she in one sentence.

    That McCain chose her made me doubt his fitness for the office of POTUS.

  • califgal

    ctredstater.

  • veritaseequitas

    in Satan’s tool box.
    We need to be careful how we speak, especially someone with a public platform where lots and lots of people can hear or read and either be encouraged or discouraged.
    Words are powerful, and they matter. If you have someone who is on the fence or not politically tuned in, careless words might just discourage them to the point that they believe the spew and smear that comes out of the mouth’s of Comrade Obama and his posse and vote for 4 more years of America’s biggest political disaster.

  • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

    While unabashedly supporting his campaign, he correctly saw that it was poorly run and headed for disaster. Perry was unable to pull out of the tailspin and make the necessary corrections.

    Will Mitt be able to adjust? Even in the midst of this great VP choice, there have been missteps. Who makes an important announcement like this at 8:45 on a Saturday morning? Whose boneheaded decision was that? Wow, they’re talking about it all day on Saturday when 1500 people are watching TV.

    It’s great that Ryan was able to slip a 5-hour Energy into Romney’s decaf this morning to get him all worked up during his speech, but apparently Romney couldn’t handle the caffeine and he made a nutty remark about Adderall that will be big news on Monday. Wait for it. The NEA will be all over this.

    In the end, Mitt is still going to be Mitt and no amount of Ryan is going to change that. His only hope is if he somehow surrounds himself with a solid conservative campaign staff and he goes through some kind of Stockholm Syndrome.

  • ctredstater

    in a visible, official role in the campaign would be awesome.

  • califgal

    women who rush home from work each day, cook dinner for the hubby and kids, and then turn on Fox and watch it until bedtime.

    The average mom doesn’t know this woman at all nor has the average woman even heard the comment. Heck, the average woman doesn’t even know about the steelworker ad. There are only 24 hours in a day and the average woman has about one hour to herself in that day if she’s lucky.

  • kowalski

    Heh. This morning, I got the news (probably as early or earlier than everyone else, certainly as early as the New Yorker and probably as early as the Associated Press.)

    Of course, owing to the lingering effects of my Stockholm Syndrome (and those effects are long lasting, in some aspects even permanent) I refrained from commeting about the Ryan pick until my brain had settled down and all the swirling thoughts of what Liberals would predictably say stopped coruscating through my crenelations. I know what they would say. I heard them before they even wrote them.

    Now it’s almost 3 in the afternoon and the fireworks show has ended and guess what? You’re right! But Ryan is a GREAT choice for VP. Now we have to be ready to carry the fight and the Romney campaign has to start taking the gloves off and being ready to fight the fight with us.

    Paul Ryan is probably the best guy we could have right now to help Romney articulate what the stakes are and more importantly to TELL THE TRUTH just as he said today.

    Team Romney/Ryan has come out of the blocks and we’re just getting into the first turn. They have to do a Usain Bolt through the turn.

    There’s a very, very clear choice in this country now. It’s not about “backward vs. forward” it’s about how America defines itself and who we are as a nation and whether or not we can deliver on what we promise. We’ve promised MUCH MORE than we can deliver and we’ve created no credible plans for even delivering what we had previously promised.

    More later….but my Stockholm Moments lasted only about 2 hours and that’s a GOOD sign. We can do it with this ticket if we have the courage and we make the case to the American people.

  • califgal

    Marco??????

  • westcoastpatriette

    and I have been put off before when it seems that Erick is being too critical or prematurely prophesying failure. OTOH, we (conservatives) have good reason to not trust establishment Republicans — who are as much against us in terms of bringing about our goals as the leftys are, and so I can see the wisdom in Erick making clear that we will not back down in our demands for real change and we are watching every move they make.

    In the end, Erick is like a good coach who, because of his expertise, is able to anticipate trouble sooner than many of us would recognize and while he’s not perfect, he is usually right on the money, IMO.

  • veritaseequitas

    I agree with your “real beginning of the American Comeback” comment. Today I feel hopeful for the first time in a long time. Today I feel as though we have a chance to take down Comrade Obama and his despicable administration.

  • kowalski

    But Romney chose someone who can really move in the ring. Now he has to prove that he can listen to some corner coaches other than his own.

    Let’s move.

  • kowalski

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPxMZ1WdINs

    Ryan is a fighter. He’s not afraid, and he’s a leader. So we’ve got two leaders on the ticket and we’re going to need them both at the top of their game.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    If you’re going to have a cow because I’m disagreeing with you, maybe you should have waited a few days before commenting.

    What’s good for the goose…

  • ceili_dancer

    Just like a blacksmith needs to work the metal while it’s still hot. This criticism is meant to take that yellow hot lump of metal and shape it into something useful if not beautiful.

  • http://www.timelyrenewed.com timelyrenewed

    Congressman Ryan is an excellent choice. However, to truly and permanently rein in our national government, we must restore the original constitutional limits on federal power. This requires not only electing good constitutional conservatives now, but also amending the Constitution to restate and re-enforce those limits so that limited government is locked in for the future after those elected officials are gone.

    Of course, Congress will never initiate such amendments, so the first step would be to reform the amendment process so that the states can initiate and enact amendments without having to go through either Congress or the unworkable and uncertain mechanism of a convention.

    Such a bold move to return power to the People would highlight the conservative constitutional message of putting the People over the federal government like no other move, and turn the campaign into one of the American people versus Washington. That’s a campaign Romney/Ryan can win. See http://www.timelyrenewed.com

  • warrior300

    Paul Ryan is an excellent choice for all the reasons stated by Erick, but he was politically my second choice after Rubio. We have gained Wisconsin at the expense of Florida. It will be much more difficult to carry states like Nevada, New Mexico, and possibly Colorado without Rubio on the ticket.

    Now the question is as Erick has pointed out, how do the GOP get Romney’s campaign off the defensive and on the offensive? Romney has never impressed me in the debates. At best one can only hope the Presidential debates will be a washout without either side gaining much ground from them. Obama is no debater, but Romney will never go for the jugular. He is also more likely to get tripped up if Obama comes up with anything in the debate Romney is not prepared to answer. Romney can really get tongue-tied when caught off guard.

    Romney’s team has got to go, particularly the three personalities Erick mentioned above. With all these billionaires throwing money into his campaign, someone better begin to take control of the management of Romney’s campaign. Since these money guys are the guys who truly run the country, they better get that money ready for some intelligent ideas of how Romney is going to grow the economy, move to a flat tax, and at the same time get “down and dirty” with the democrats forcing them on the defensive. It’s nice of some of the comment responses to talk about a campaign of ideas. We need that. However, at the same time, the majority of Americans are incapable of logical thought analysis, and will respond to emotional messages and bumper sticker slogans.

    It’s time after the conventions to begin to take Obama personally apart piece by piece without the need for commercial exaggeration or lies, like the Obama people have been doing. Obama leads the American communist party, which is neither an exaggeration nor a lie. It has been that way since the Marxist took over the leadership of the party and its infrastructure back with the 1972 election. Clinton was just as leftist as Obama, particularly during the first two years of his administration. He had no choice but to moderate his positions, once he had to deal with a Republican congress the remaining six years.

    All that money that will soon be available to Romney will do him no good, if he and his staff can’t stop shooting themselves in the foot., and he continues to surround himself with political consultants who are by nature and practice part of the Country Club Republican set. Romney even as a primary campaigner made so many stumbles. He really is not a fast thinker in debate or on the stump. All the money in the world will not do him any good, when he will have to run against a news media that will play down every mistake of Obama’s while playing up every miscue of Romney’s. The GOP will have to run against the media as much as the democrats. Newt knew that, and reporters need to be called out with their bias and deceitful reports. If unbiased trackers of the media demonstrate that Obama is getting more coverage and more favorable coverage than Romney, then the GOP needs to raise a firestorm over this. The American people don’t trust the press and more than the politicians. The GOP needs to exploit media bias for all it’s worth, but keep the criticism legitimate.

    I am really looking forward to the debate between Ryan and Biden. If Ryan doesn’t devour that retard, there truly will be no hope for the GOP. Speaking of the debates, will we have another shut-out of FOX NEWS and its reporters like during the 2008 debates? Unfortunately, I can see Romney agree to such a thing just like McCain did.

  • acat

    This will be a tough fight – in part because the stakes are rather high, and in part because our opposition will cheat every way they can. It is the nature of the contest.

    My read on the Ryan pick is that it both reasserts the primacy of the economy as “Romney’s issue” and it gives Romney as proxy he can use to beat the crap out of Team Obama over the state of the economy.

    We will see whether Romney-Ryan agrees.

    Mew

  • kowalski

    We know why the economy is suffering – and the reasons are manifold. Ryan can deliver the message, he can phrase it well, he can present it clearly, he can make it resonate, his grasp of the issues is excellent and he’s got the presence and the confidence to stand his ground and make the case.

    I got over my worst doubts about 1.5 hours into thinking about it after having read all the predictable baloney from the Sausage Making Team.

    That’s a remarkably short period of Stockholm anguish in my terms, which is very encouraging. :)

    I think he and Romney can do it.

  • ohiohistorian

    Joe Biden?
    Are you referring to “death panels” like the NY Times says exist in the law?
    How about “I can see Russia from here”? Oops, that was Tina Fey mugging Sarah Palin.
    Let’s have a fun debate. Let’s let Obama and the TOTUS debate her. THAT would be hilarious, even if the questions are leaked to Obama beforehand.

  • acat

    Romney/Ryan can pull this off.

    To Erick’s point, the main issue where Romney has stepped in it is in getting *around* the media… he can’t seem to figure out how to do that, and he must in order to win.

    Mew

  • kowalski

    They know they’re going to lie. They’re lying right now! It’s not hard to imagine them to keep lying so they can continue to lie in the future. These things aren’t sophisticated: We’re REWARDING them so far, for lying. Well, it has to stop.

    The lying will stop one way or the other, the whole question is whether or not we want the “hard stop” where everyone gets creamed or the “soft stop” where the perpetrators of the lies are kicked out of office and the rest of the people have a chance to recover. I vote for the latter.

  • fpete13527

    First, I fully respect stay at home moms, AND their opinions (which you don’t seem to).

    Second, equal numbers of working, single women I know were equally disgusted.

    Third, women I know just aren’t the Hilary Rosen types that you seem to model yourself after.

    In fact, all the women I know agree.on this….except for the progressives…..whether they be progressive Dem …..or progressive Rep….or progressive indie.

  • ohiohistorian

    despite her “unpreparedness”. So who did we elect? The guy who knows nothing but promises everything, and his sidekick who knows even less but is never at a loss for an opinion. I am sure that the only reason that Obama would never be impeached is the words “President Biden”.

  • conservativemusician

    And I was also a Perry supporter as well, but regardless of how conservative he is, it did no good that he couldn’t articulate his positions without being thought of as a bumpkin. Romney and Ryan are both quick on their feet and will hold up very nicely both on the campaign trail as well as the debates.

    Ryan is an excellent choice and fills in the gaps very nicely. He is young, smart, well-qualified, and likeable. He is also very conservative, so I see lots of upside here. Perhaps this is the campaign restart that Erick wanted.

  • westcoastpatriette

    and I look forward to some of the ads the Super pacs will put together that will really go after the fraud that O has been and continues to be.

    I kinda like that about the Super pacs — they can really take off the gloves and do some serious damage. I think people are angry enough with the phony O has turned out to be that they will listen this time and believe the truth about O’s shady past — without worrying about the racism charge. A con man is a con man no matter what race he is. Time to fire this one.

  • kowalski

    In addition to being a detail oriented super-data-driven kind of analytic guy, I hope he’s a fast learner. We’re going to find out, that’s for sure. He can see the data now. Let’s see how fast he learns from it.

  • ohiohistorian

    Especially his Mother and all of the other dead people the Dems are trying to keep on the voter rolls.

  • http://lukos.com Ed54

    How many sky-is-falling, anybody-but-Romney articles did you write during the primary? Right up to the point where he dispatched his last rival and clinched the nomination, you were pounding him as a weak candidate, saying he could never secure the base, and calling for the heads of his campaign staff.

    Now he has picked a VP who by your own account is a spectacular choice who secures the basse, and 12 hours later you are … calling for the heads of his campaign staff?

    Here’s an alternate interpretation of the primary: maybe, just maybe, they know what they are doing.

  • ctredstater

    I really love that theme which the Romney-Ryan campaign is using. I always cringe a little bit when the phrase “take America back” is used – even by people on my side.

    I LOVE the idea that it is America that is going to come back!!!

    That taps into Reaganesque optimism – and these guys are going to lead it, with God’s help – and ours.

    The best day America has had in quite a while. The Comeback has begun!!!!

  • kowalski

    Is that he overtrusts his own analysis. That’s the “Bain Way” and it was necessary for them to be people who could literally walk into a failing business and tell them how to run it, how to reorganize it, how to turn it around – including collapsing it if necessary. That takes a lot of analysis, a lot of compartmentalization AND a lot of ego. And there’s nothing wrong with that – because that’s what it really does require.

    Think about walking into your neighbor’s house and saying: “You know, you really shouldn’t invest in that stock you’re thinking of. You really shouldn’t buy that X right now. Instead, you should do Y.” It takes a lot of guts.

    The flipside of that is that Romney’s team has historically been inside their own bubble a little too much.

    This isn’t Bain Capital any more, Governor. This is the Presidency of the United States. You need to take some advice as well as give it against this opponent in particular. We stand ready to help you.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    Beating the snot out of Biden is a kindergarten lunch outing. And nobody gives a damn about the VP debates.

    You can say anything you want, but Sarah was a total light weight. Good at throwing red meat and nothing more. She was totally unprepared for the campaign. Should McCain have helped her more? Sure. It wouldn’t have made a difference.

    The only thing that matters today is that Paul Ryan is our VP candidate. We’ll have to see how it shakes out, Personally, I’m pretty bullish.

  • Bill S

    Erick and others started that several days ago.

    The Ryan nomination does not change the fact that his staff is inept. Now that he chose a great VP candidate, that advantage cannot be pissed away by amateurish dolts with loose lips.

  • tngal

    If Romney’s touting HIS OWN budget plan what the heck did he pick Ryan for? There are others who provide more red meat and can string three sentences together. Newt for instance. ‘Course Newt would’ve been too hard for Romney to tame.

    Ryan’s strength lies on the fiscal side of the coin. Romney should embrace Ryan’s strength. Here’s hoping Ryan can be a little assertive over Romney. Some presidents have really relied on their veeps as advisors. Others, not so much.

    I would hate to think he only picked Ryan because the man can be an effective bullhorn.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    I actually didn’t have a choice, but I’m happy with Ryan.

  • http://www.mauiisland.com mauiisl

    are correct.

  • kowalski

    It’s like: “Hey! We’re lying and it’s working! It’s not working all the time, but it’s working a little more than half the time. That’s GREAT!”

    Our task is to drive the Prevarication Success Rate under 50%.

    And that takes people who are willing to stand up and call a lie a lie.

  • Tbone

    You sound like more like wimp3.0.

    Do us a favor and stay home. We don’t need any chicken littles in this fight.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    What happened on September 15, 2008? It was all downhill for McCain from there.

    Dude, you need to pay more attention.

  • Viet71

    Any doubts, check out Daily Krud.

    Ryan is a thoughtful, competent, hard-working politician and technocrat.

    His proposals to rein in government spending seem to this writer to make sense.

    The Leftists, however, are tarring him with the brush that he wants to destroy Medicare as we know it.

    To use Leftist lingo, Romney better do something fast to seize the narrative. Otherwise, this campaign is going to be all about evil, rich, white, elite Republicans who care naught for ordinary Americans instead of being about Obama’s handling of the helm.

  • Rich Fader

    It didn’t happen in ’08, and in hindsight, it should have. It almost certainly should happen now, based on what I’ve seen from these guys before the pick. And it’s not going to. You’ve got the presidential candidate you’ve got, and the campaign staff he’s got. I don’t think these guys are going to backstab Ryan like McCain’s staff did Palin, but they could still screw it up without resorting to that.

  • Finrod

    Every one of these polls that has had Obama up by 4 or more have also been adjusted to oversample for Democrats by an absurd amount. Of course a poll that’s been weighted D+7 or D+9 is going to have Obama ahead. Some of them are of registered voters, not likely voters, which only makes the distortion worse.

    Rasmussen has been in a range for the past 3 months in a Romney +8 to Obama +2, with the core of the range being Romney +2 to +4. Gallup has it dead even. That’s where the race is, IMHO. The Obama campaign has not been campaigning as a campaign that’s in the lead, because they know this, even though they’d never admit it.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    The left going about whoever Romney picked is to be expected.
    The Fish is rotting from the head (Obama) on the smear Strategy. The left is following their own leader by stooping to sewer level to make the most unfair attacks they can.

    I openly expressed concern that a Ryan pick would give Team Obama and opening to demagogue entitlements. This was before ads that called Romney a felon, tax cheat, murderer, etc. My concerns were misplaced. They would have attacked anyone Romney picked …. anyone.

    It was a bold pick by Romney and it tells us he wont let a leftist stream of obscene lies stop him from making the right decision.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Most people don’t even know what they are. McCain quit, then tried to un-quit, but it was too late. That’s why he lost.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    nt

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    no text

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Someone who thinks like Andrea Saul or a Conservative?

    She occupies an important seat on the Romney team, and someone else would perform that function much better.

    Upgrade, please! It’s the Conservative way.

  • brewster

    Ok so you don’t hate the man just his ideologies. But try to be objective a little. Obviously you guys think Ryan is the ideal but there aren’t enough of you to win the election for Romney. People are scared and choosing a man who could very well slide into the presidency with his budget policy ideas are not helping Romney with the swing voters and Medicare receipients. Medicare and Romneycare are going to be difficult albatross’ to unload for Romney/Ryan don’t you think?

  • brewster

    Obama. And I will admit that I am scared enough for my children’s future to vote for Romney and may still but this choice for VP shows a waivering to the right wing of legislators who believe “compromise means coming to our side.” I can see Romney as President, but Ryan? Not as unnerving as Palin but not much better.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    If no one knows who Andrea Saul is, then she won’t be missed.

  • brewster

    No text

  • codenametimna

    I finally went ahead and did it. I donated to the Romney campaign for the very first time. As an evangelical Christian I was hesitant to dole out money to the Romney campaign because Romney is a man with a past which has been littered with many ‘liberal’ policies that have tended to paint Romney as a liberal Republican running to the left of Ted Kennedy the liberal Democrat.

    I now perceive Romney as a moderate who is leaning more and more conservative but has had a tendency to flip-flop on the issues and because of those anomalies he had a high likelihood of losing to Obama in November in my opinion. But choosing Paul Ryan as his VP has upped the excitement and therefore has earned my financial support in order to help enable a Romney/Ryan victory over O’bummer and Biden.

    I would have still voted for Romney if indeed he had chosen a moderate as his VP. Because ANYBODY but Obama is the main goal and priority. But choosing Paul Ryan has boosted the conservative cause and excited the Republican base, and therefore, if my added finances can help in any way to defeat O’bummer and Democrats in Congress this November, then I’m more than happy to do my part to help make that happen. Hopefully others will feel the same way and will pony up to help give Romney a continued financial edge against the Obama machine.

    If Obama eats enough dust then Obama and crew could gag and sputter from a lack of financial resources and likely peter out in the run up to the election. Obama killed McCain in regards to campaign finances. A reversal of that trend could spell doom for Obama and thus ruin his chances of getting reelected. Hello!

    You have to give Mitt Romney a lot of credit for taking such a bold step in picking Paul Ryan. Romney could have laid back and made a much safer pick but would have likely lulled the Republican Party base to sleep and as such, to a much lower voter turn out on election day. That has all changed as of today.

    Paul Ryan could very well turn out to be Mitt Romney’s ticket into the White House. Conservatives within the Republican Party make up a huge percentage of the overall vote. Paul Ryan’s conservatism has reverberated around the country and demonstrates a man who is really smart and is dedicated to America’s fiscal restoration and is also a person who won’t lie to the American people like Barack Obama and Joe Biden have repeatedly done over the course of four mind numbing years of no-recovery summers and high unemployment.

    The Tea Party is excited about Paul Ryan and conservatives in general are also excited. A Romney/Ryan ticket is sure to set the Republican Party (and Independents) on fire and the result will hopefully be a resounding victory on election day. That is my hope and prayer.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Virtually everything that anyone remembers that Palin said during the 2008 campaign were statements made by Tina Fey, not Sarah Palin. The only mistake that McCain made in picking Sarah Palin was in not preparing her adequately for what she was going to face as VP candidate ( I won’t go into the magnitude of the other mistakes he made in that campaign–that would be preaching to the choir).

    Because of Paul Ryan’s current job, I think he is more than prepared for what is coming. He has already had to watch himself in commercials pushing an old lady in a wheelchair over a cliff. It can’t get much worse than that.

  • kowalski

    I tend to think the main problems in this cycle are simple, probably too simple for my own good:

    We all know the American government is going to look like the defaulting governments around the world in a few years unless something is done. The big problem is to start people thinking hard about how to fix it before it happens.

    I’m not rich: if the rich get soaked, they’ll leave. I’ll be in about the same situation I’m in right now, maybe on welfare, probably with less opportunity, but basically not much different than where I am right now.

    Without controlling spending and growing our economy we’re finished, we’re all going to be on welfare, and that welfare has really already run out. So to me, it doesn’t take a SuperPAC to say it.

    You can be poor and on the government dole in Spain, too: and nobody is accusing people in Spain who are on the government dole of living well. But there’s still a long way for us to fall in the next four years. Obama can protect his interests in the government and with the unions, all the money ultimately comes from somewhere else. His paycheck is paid by American taxpayers and Union dues are paid by people who have a place to work. We’re on the verge of a manifold threat: long term default on our entitlements, sagging and listless economy, shrinking wealth, shrinking capital owned by individuals, general lack of investment, too high taxes, unfunded mandates, and what seems to be among Democrats this unbreakable desire to continue to make what is causing the problem worse.

    They can do that if they want. They will if they win.

  • goodgovernance

    when Romney was just beginning to show weakness in the swing states, and I basically got accused by posters and even a moderator of being a liberal or an independent for raising the alarm. Now I think no matter what happens history will show that Romney squandered the pre-Olympics period.

    But at this moment I’m scratching my head a little. Romney is not my cup of tea at all, but he just did something good. This seems like an odd moment to call for staff shakeups, when the time to have done so was earlier, or perhaps a day or two later.

    Also, I see a lot of people are still talking about how Romney needs to “go on the attack” against Obama. Well, what do you think he has been doing? Granted, he hasn’t been effective at it, but that’s because he hasn’t established what makes him worthy of the presidency himself. Romney can say, “Isn’t Obama terrible?” all he wants, but all swing voters and independents are going to do is raise an eyebrow and say, “Well what makes you so much better, stranger?”

    The good news is if the race is still this close despite Romney’s bumbles, he will soar ahead in the polls if he can just become a halfway decent campaigner. In other words, I think Obama’s pretty much at his ceiling. Romney’s at his floor. A great convention speech and debate performances could do wonders for him.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    and people care deeply about their job security.

    When McCain left the cause of the HOUSING-INDUCED crisis remain fuzzy, it fell to the party occupying the White House.

    You may prefer to analyze the Sunday talk-show stuff, but people’s home values were tanking, credit was freezing, layoffs were skyrocketing.

    Nah, no one cares about that stuff.

  • Viet71

    The best outcome is Romney wins.

    The second best outcome is Romney doesn’t win but runs a tough, principled campaign that shines through to the future.

    At this point, he appears to be forced into a corner. Ryan doesn’t help him much there.

    Bold? Dunno. Safe? For sure, judging from the comments here and elsewhere. Mostly of no consequence except to the extent Ryan can be painted as a target. Or to the extent Romney can seize control of the debate.

  • kowalski

    Going on in Europe, where the ECB and the Germans and other countries that are still swimming with their heads above water are being asked to squirt out increasingly large sums of money to keep the corrupt and dysfunctional Socialist governments that are defaulting on everything under the sun afloat. Meanwhile, here in the United States, we keep acting as though we’re immune to that.

    We’re immune in the sense that there’s nobody in the Universe big enough to bail out this economy – not out of its entitlement obligations, not out of its deficits, not anything! When we go broke, there isn’t anything in the world big enough to shore the United States up, and every time the Democrats turn around, they keep thinking of a better way for us to go broke, faster.

  • kowalski

    Who think that the best way to deal with our truly Olympian debt is to inflate our way out of the problem. But all of them know that causes many of its own problems – more than it’s worth.

    The real question in this election is whether enough people in America understand basic economics well enough to save the Republic before we have to do things that are really insane.

    It’s an open question whether or not we have the numbers of people who grasp that any more. We’ve dumbed the country down so much that it’s really almost impossible to say.

  • renl57

    …showing Granny being pushed off a cliff, was put out there long before Romney even started vetting VP candidates.

    Conservatives have been on the record as saying that the growth in entitlement spending must be curbed. And of course the Dems hated us for it. It’s a little too late to act like Obama and claim that our words were taken out of context or something.

    It’s what we believe. We might as well say so.

  • PowerToThePeople

    While I have no use for Palin politically, McCain made a choice that nearly saved his sinking campaign. It was a lifeboat that no other person could have offered.

    Like I stated above, I have no use for Palin politically, but your rant about her dress code sounded a lot like a fat person made at the hot person next to them that brings out the fat in them badly. How she dresses has no bearing on her intellect, her ability, or her lack of intellect and ability. Find a real reason to dislike her or fix the flaws you have that keep you from dressing hot. Hate to say it considering we both dislike her politically, but your “pumps and hot clothes” rant really makes you look petty and foolish.

  • PowerToThePeople

    for both of you dude using dudes.

  • Xasteius

    what you said has been going on for the last 20 years with the current R’s and Democrats; the Republicans have played nice with the D’s, and the R’s are still labeled as extremists.

  • brewster

    But if that’s how you guys roll go ahead. Just thought I might engage in some political speculation. But if you want to be the right wing version of crooks and liars, well, this is your site.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    If you say so.

  • kowalski

    What I would say to the kids graduating from College right now is:

    “You don’t have enough time in your lives to pay the debts the Democrats are trying to impose on you before you even get a job.”

  • PowerToThePeople

    enough to make the “scared for my children” comment but yet state you will most likely vote for Obama, then you are too much of a dumbass to pay attention to.

    As to the rest of your gibberish, moron.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    about Perry’s campaign staff. They’re the same ones who went on to run Dewhurst’s campaign. Two straight losses from folks who ran one of the nastiest smear campaigns ever (against Cruz). I’d say Erick’s track record with regard to campaigns and staffers is pretty good, and Romney would do well to listen to him.

    I was overjoyed at Ryan getting the nod, but I’m enough of a realist to know that it’s going to take each and every one of us to get up off the couch and work to get R&R elected. It’s going to take Romney fighting to win, not just campaigning for Obama to lose. It’s going to take clear and concise messaging to the American public which Ryan can and will do. It’s going to take GOTV, door knocking, poll watching, social media, voter registration, donations, and everything the Dems are doing and more because we’re up against liberals who will pull any and every trick in the book they can get away with to win.

    Again, Ryan is a great choice, but as Erick said, it’s not enough. Not if we want to win in 86 days. That’s what I took from this diary.

  • Viet71

    Time to step up to the plate. Period.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    Just wanted confirmation.

    And the scripture is a little tongue in cheek. I have no doubt God has a sense of humor. Liberals, not so much.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    ..

  • kowalski

    Because they’ve created a society where they cannot see the forest for the trees. If it had been my decision whether or not to allow Greece into the European Union, I would have said:

    “Greece is the historic birthplace of Western Civilization. In terms of its ancient philosophy and its ruins, it’s historic architecture and its contributions to Western thought, plus its natural beauty, it’s one of the greatest places on Earth. However, ever since the Onassis-Kennedy merger, Greece has shown itself to be a palace full of thieves. They have an oligarchy that is privileged and rich, a Socialist government that will always add 2+2 to make 3 because it keeps one for itself, and it is to this day a society that has been built upon other people’s money and continues to look away from these facts. Do not allow them to become members.”

    There. One paragraph and I could have solved that problem. It has the benefit of being true. I would let them leave immediately and reestablish the Drachma. No remorse, no repent.

    But the EU did it anyway and we are now looking at the results.

  • kowalski

    What do you do with people who not only can’t pay their rent but are threatening to destroy the rest of your livelihood?

    You evict them. You kick them out. Unfortunately the Europeans in their Infinite Wisdom saw fit not to give themselves a mechanism to throw countries like Greece under the bus.

  • wintermute

    ‘scared for my children enough to vote for Romney… but Im not going to.’ I wouldn’t care if somebody could clearly explain their vote for Obama. Id most likely disagree vehemently with their reasoning but I have yet to get anything besides this kind terrible thinking. It makes absolutely no sense.

  • devan95

    We’re sick of you whining. And take Laura Ingraham with you. All the both of you an do is bitch and complain. Get on board or get lost. This election is too important to tolerate under-miners.

  • acat

    I was under the impression that the buckets of ca$h stolen from Medicare and Medicaid and used to slather Obamacare in lip$tick had served to move its’ insolvency even nearer…

    To those who repeat such hogwash, I propose asking where Obama’s plan to save Medicare is… was it in his 2010 or 2011 budget, perhaps?

    Mew

  • califgal

    You’re arguing that the average American woman/voter can identify Andrea Saul either by name or by face?

    Given a picture of her, the average American woman can say, “Oh, she’s the Romney spokesperson who, instead of attacking the steelworker who lied or attacking the Dems who lied about Romney, chose to state that in his home state of MA, his wife who died would’ve had health care?

    I don’t care if the average woman works 40 hours a week or is a stay -at-home- and- take -care- of- the- kids mom; in fact, I don’t care if we expand this to cover men–neither the average man nor the average woman know who Saul is or what she said or anything about her.

    If you think they do, then you are living and breathing politics 24/7 and don’t realize what occupies the rest of the citizens of this country, esp. this far from November.

  • kowalski

    Because they’ve been ROOKED as hard as any country’s citizens in the civilized world have ever been rooked by their leadership. It’s not any surprise they have to fight off the anarchists: their entire government has shown itself to be comprehensively irresponsible.

    They were promised things that could never be delivered. They were sold a pack of lies. They kept listening to the lies because of the feta cheese and the Ouzo and all the wonderful, crumbling marble architecture.

    I’d be angry too. But that’s what’s coming to America if people don’t change course, and very soon, because believe me: The Europeans are NOT going to bail us out, and neither are the Chinese.

  • califgal

    a low-level airhead spinner who did a bad job, and the person who hired her and sent her out to be a spokesperson didn’t train her well.

    I’d like never to see a spinner that looks as young as she. I see all these youngsters on Fox, primarily Dems whom Fox brings in for “balance” and they are idiots, but the GOP has idiots too.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    Obama would die for that.

  • califgal

    those in a frenzy over Andrea Saul–you are over-reacting because the average voter doesn’t even know what she said or who she is.

  • Viet71

    Obama has done much to undermine this country, which he hates.

    Ryan can be tagged with getting rid of Medicare as we know it.

    Am talking politics.

    But think of this: after November, no matter what happens, not much will change. The national debt will increase. GDP will depend on China and Europe. The Dow will struggle to hover around 13,000, or somewhere.

    More of the same.

    If you, acat, have a vision of the future that is good, let us know.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    ntn

  • acat

    Romney is the nominee, and clearly he wants the job, but he’s surrounded himself with buffoons and fools and other, less savory words for GOP insider leeches and consultants. (but I repeat myself)

    Your inability to discern the difference between corrective criticism and vitriol is rather sad… perhaps you should go read some Daily Kos so you’ll recognize the latter when you see it.

    Mew

  • acat

    He could try and impress Tancredo’s followers by deporting her…..

    Mew

  • streiff

    I’m intrigued by your ideas and want to subscribe to your newsletter.

    Just one question. The Amendment process is in the Constitution. How do you propose to change the Constitution without using the rules laid out in the Constitution?

  • aesthete

    Nominating Ryan *is* both image control, and a bold attempt to control the narrative. Ryan is no fool; in fact, he was instrumental in making ObamaCare as unpopular as it is, and in challenging the assumption that ObamaCare was going to be deficit neutral. Not many people think that ObamaCare is going to be deficit-neutral now as opposed to when Ryan started to hammer his points. Ryan has been at the head of the fight on entitlements and such, and has great F/U ratings. He has been inventive and effective at communicating to the electorate, and has experience in blue state politics (he is a WI politician).

    Romney’s pick does a few things:

    1) It aggressively makes this election about government debt/size and the economy — both issues that Obama has no credibility on.

    2) It puts probably our best spokesperson on these issues front and center.

    3) It (hopefully) marks a transition to a more substance-based campaign, which if done right will absolutely *destroy* Obama. No one cares if Obama is a secret Muslim, or if he’s eaten dog — they will care that Obama is taking money out of their paychecks to pay for Soylandras, that the regulatory burden is making it harder for businesses to employ people, and that their healthcare is being radically altered without their consent. They will care that their children will have to pay for all of this. Ryan is perhaps our best and most image-friendly way to communicate these points to the electorate.

  • 6eorge Jetson


    Dude, where’s my change?

  • goodgovernance

    Anyone want to doubt McCain would be 5-10 points ahead of Obama this cycle? Because he would be, and you know it.

    There was a huge wave in 2008, circumstances beyond any candidate’s control. You can’t just wave away the fact the public was tired of 8 years of Bush, and the excitement behind Obama swept away even masterful political operatives like the Clintons.

  • acat

    but it depends entirely on whether We The People live up to Roberts’ expectations.

    I am not optimistic…. but I am not without hope.

    Mew

  • Viet71

    He’s like Romney.

    Romney needs to be a fighter. Technocrats do not become president.

  • supergirl2911

    I like Virginia for the announcement-Swing State, geographically close to several swing state
    and an opportunity to keep talking about Obama saying “I didn’t build that”
    I didn’t understand a Saturday am announcement, but now I like it. Certainly all the media had to be all hands on deck, but isn’t congress is on recess, so… he’s not missing any votes :) and all the attack dog liberals are at the beach…. maybe and I think this is the weekend that Obama is celebrating his birthday.
    I like to think this is a planned event and time, because its gives the media time to take in what Romney Ryan has prepared: great photo ops, their stump speeches this weekend, etc.
    And of course, I like the Ryan pick. I haven’t stopped smiling.

  • runner12

    Our country is in massive debt. In less than two years, we will be Greece if we continue on this path.

    The entitlement programs you cite are outdated both in form and function. All Ryan has suggested is that we reform them so that they do not become insolvent. We only have two choices. We can either fix it now and ensure that the most vulnerable (those who truly cannot take care of themselves) are taken care of or watch it all implode.

    I am not worried at all about Medicare recipients and Ryan. They are more angry at O that he is cutting 500 million from Medicare under ObamaCare to give to those who will not work. Medicare in its current form is awful and the recipients know it. Ryan is smart enough to articulate to them how reform will save the program. That is why he scares the living crap out of you and other libs.

  • runner12

    decisions with utter disregard for reason and logic.

  • unapologetic_american

    Know that it’s traditionally the VP’s job. Ryan will be able to viciously attack Obama and do so in an intellectual way. Once the “Ryan wants to kill your Medicare/Medicaid” argument gets dispelled the libs aren’t going to have anything to use against him. Be happy they’re over playing that card now and not saving it for October.

  • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

    but just what does that mean, exactly?

    Does it mean “criticize everything he does that we consider to be a mistake,” even though the strategy behind it may be sound but completely unknown to us? How does that help our cause? How do you know your opinion is better than his, that you will turn out to be right and he’ll be wrong?

    A writer claims Romney has wasted the pre-Olympic period. His opinion, not a fact. The trip to England, Israel, and Poland was not a waste or a bad idea. There were no “gaffes,” except in the mind of the press, who never found itself able to quote him directly, but always paraphrased him in such as way as to change the event. It was reported that way, and the folks on our side didn’t help when they didn’t refute that charge every chance they got.

    At this point, I say that if you want to criticize Romney, do it in a personal letter to him. The Democrats will be very happy to do it publicly for you. Congratulate him for what you agree with and shut up about the rest, because it doesn’t help. If you like Ryan as VP, fine, say so. Even say why. But if you think it’s a mistake, keep it to yourself. Whatever you have to say along that line has probably already been said by Democrats. They’ve been preparing their attacks for some time, against all the possibilities. I even heard one today who was willing to criticize John Kennedy and his “inexperience” as being at fault for the Cuban missile crisis in order to make the point that Ryan is “too young.”

    That doesn’t mean be a “yes” man, just hold back the comments that only express your own disagreement with our candidate. You don’t have to express agreement with decisions or policies you don’t like, but expressing your disagreement with them won’t change them. This does leave you free to make all the pro-active comments and suggestions that you like, such as “make sure Andrea Saul doesn’t appear in public again.” That’s a campaign execution critique, not a complaint about policy or decision-making.

    And never forget that he has 98% of the “respected” press out there disparaging everything he does and lying about a lot of it. They don’t need our help. As Bill said, he needs perfect execution to beat Obama. Let’s not make it even harder.

    For constructive criticism, I suggest he gets somebody on the staff who understands how to get his message covered by the press in a way that people will see it. His message itself is out there. Finding it among the clutter is a problem for us. (It amazes me that campaigns don’t seem to hire experts in mass psychology to help them with this stuff.)

  • demsaresatanic

    preferring fluff to accuracy being only one of them.

  • clintonformccain

    …that EE has been relentlessly negative about the Republican nominee for President since day one.

  • cardcarryingmom

    Everybody get behind this ticketand be “Happy Warriors”! A solid team with a solid 5 point message! I understand the concerns in this diary but it’s vital to rally now. I’m sure those incompetents will be put in their place but it’s not going to be made public because that isn’t Romney’s style.

    Very Happy Warrior’ing to all…

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Also, how many politicians have they helped elect?

  • kowalski

    Song of the Day today is H?sker D?: “It’s Not Funny Anymore”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISGjNeBENXw

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I get why you came here in the first place, but if you hate it so much now, why do you stay?

  • SoFiMil

    Talk about a Debbie Downer. Sure glad you’re not running the campaign. Not even sure where to begin. I did see from your posting history you use all caps in the comment title. Don’t.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    and the troll snaps it up….

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    I thought they had all went over to Sheriff Joe…

  • kowalski

    I realize it’s hard to keep track. There are so many Obama relatives in this country living on the public dole it’s getting tough to keep track of them, but make sure you’ve got the right one, there.

  • kowalski

    For living in Public Housing while being in the system illegally.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nOwmxQmLzQ

    The system “took advantage of her”:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20017043-503544.html

    So get it straight, bub. She’s a victim. Officially.

  • kowalski

    “Onyango, however, told WBZ-TV, “If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen.”

    There you go. That is basically the official policy of the United States of America right now, courtesy of Aunt Zeituni, who knows what she’s talking about. Her nephew is the President.

  • kowalski

    Because he came to America as an Immigrant and we had an OBLIGATION to make him a citizen. So therefore, he is one!

    Don’t you see how this works?

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I’m sure we haven’t heard that last of Tancredo here in Colorado, even though I’d love to be proven wrong.

  • acat

    how once again reflexive, unthinking liberal weakness sows the seeds of failure… and the destruction of all of us.

    Honestly, I wouldn’t mind liberals nearly as much if they’d leave me out of their petty plans…. of course, then they’d not be liberals.

    (Cheshire grin)

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Please note that I think you are far closer to getting it right than is my dude-sparring partner above.

    McCain was actually polling as slightly ahead in mid Sept.

    But then the housing-induced crisis blew up on Sept 15. Housing prices tanked, credit froze, layoffs skyrocketed, and the stock market plummetted.

    McCain’s campaign adviser had scored $2 million in consulting fees from the GSEs. And McCain barely mentioned the GSEs’ role in the crisis.

    So our standard bearer left the cause of the crashing economic situation fuzzy. And, in the absence of an explanation, of course the general public was going to place the blame on the party occupying the White House.

    And so it was Game Over, up and down the ticket. Yes, that was a wave. One that could only be stopped from reaching tsunami proportions by educating the public as to the causes of the HOUSING-INDUCED crisis. Absent that public education, Republicans were going to get crushed up and down the ticket, which they were.

  • CarolT

    Palin was a good pick, if she has more than four days notice. It did not work as well as it could have. I am a woman, I am not jealous of her, that is some of what I feel when women say they hate her, I ask why and they say they “just do” it’s because they are jealous. McCain needed life in his campaign, Mitt should have been the nominee in 2008, not McCain. Someone here at RS told me that the tradition of last time’s loser is this year’s establishment choice started with Ronald Reagan, it should also end with Ronald Reagan.

    I am thrilled with Paul Ryan as VP and hope that Romney’s camp fires Andrea Saul, but as of this afternoon, they had not, she tweeted how much $$ they had pulled in since the Ryan announcement at The Weekly Standard website. Erick is right, if he meant to get rid of the losing staff. Saul is one of them.

    My late father user to say that if was a little work but it meant a lot, as in the case of “if” Sarah Palin had sufficient time to get ready to be VP nominee, but she did not.

  • warrior300

    Tbone and SoFoMil, your criticisms sound like what one reads on Daily Kos or Starlight News. No analysis, just ad hominem attacks. No discussion of what pitfalls to avoid after McCain and Dole, and Romney’s performance to date. I’m sure you’re both good country club republicans.

  • acat

    Not by Tbone, maybe SoFiMil..

    The simple fact, Warrior300, is that you’ve got a big dollop of #Fail mixed into your post. It’s what you know that isn’t so, as Reagan may have put it.

    Rubio is Cuban-American and does not help with the Mexican-American immigrants or their families. Further, Colorado is not likely to go GOP because the Colorado GOP are “in a rebuilding year”. Romney will have a very tough fight there because of the ineptitude on the ground, ideology doesn’t help with that.

    Replacing Colorado with Wisconsin is, EV-wise, close enough to a wash. Look at the MAPS, Warrior300. (start with this one)

    Yes, Romney / Ryan need to take it to Obama .. but that’s already happening.

    Yes, Romney has some stupid staff. I hope the smarter ones are reading Red State and saying “Oh crap, we need to muzzle the morons!” but .. not much else we can do without ending up with Obama as a two-termer.

    Try reading for a while, Warrior300.

    Mew

  • http://www.mtgriffith.com independentmike

    Paul Ryan is a puzzling pick for a running mate. What does he bring with him? Wisconsin? What does he give you? He gives you the controversial Ryan Budget, which the left will now demagogue even more than they did before.

    I have nothing against Paul Ryan. He was named Conservative of the Year for 2011 by Human Events magazine. His American Conservative Union rating is over 90%, and his National Right to Life Committee rating is 100%.

    But Marco Rubio’s conservative credentials are just as strong, and Rubio would have brought Florida with him, would have helped greatly with the hispanic vote, and would have brought no existing controversy with him.

    Ryan’s not a bad choice, but he’s not the best choice that could have been made. Rubio would have been a much better pick. If not Rubio, then Gov. McDonnell of VA would have been a better pick than Ryan.

    But, again, I have nothing against Ryan, and I believe he would make a solid VP. So Romney/Ryan it is. It’s just puzzling that Romney did not take Rubio.

  • perry4prez

    I have not posted on RedState since the primaries because I was so disappointed in Perrys loss. I thought we missed a once in a generation chance to have constitutional conservative president. I said I was going to quit posting and I did. Until now Romney did nothing to change my mind especally with his defense of O’Romneycare this week.

    But now I am excited again. Ryan is a constitutional and a conservative. Now the election is beween electing a Communist and a genuine conservative who is not afraid to cut social programs. We need to return to a spirit of self-reliance and rugged individualism and get people to quit depending on unconstitutional nanny-state social programs. We MUST OVERUTRN Obamacare and rollback other programs, otherwise we are worse than Greece. Ryan understands this. I only wish that Ryan was the top dog but this positions him well for 2020.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Secondly, I doubt McCain was actually actively harming Palin. He had no reason to do so. Schmidt, on the other hand…

    In any case, it’s probably not Romney Ryan must worry about. It’s those in Congress, the Cabinet, and surrounding Mitt in the White House.

  • perry4prez

    We will never forgive them, they will be primaried. Crist and Dewhurst will be nothing compared to what we will do. But I am not too worried about that. Ryan can hold his own against Romney and unlike Palin who was thought of as a lightweight he is smart and always shows his mastery of the facts.

  • streiff

    1. Do you really think Rubio wanted it? As a 1/3 term senator — this standard only applies to Republicans — he would have gotten the Palin treatment in the press and would, in the case of a loss, have ruined his career.

    2. Do you really think most hispanics consider Florida Cubans as hispanic?

  • Bill S

    …that there is a conservative politician on the planet that the Leftists would NOT demonize? If we picked our candidates based on what the Kos Kidz thought, the VP choice would be Al Franken.

  • rodguy911

    I saw that near four minute video of Paul Ryan thoroughly gutting tiny Tim who had to sit on even more phone books to reach the table after it was over.

    Very few in politics have the knowledge or the where-with- all to take on Tiny Tim,the tax cheat, Geithner.Paul Ryan does.

    Geithner, who mentioned every ten seconds in his response that it was all Bush’s fault, is as tough as O’Axel. Both are seasoned Marxists and always make it look like its someone else’s fault that they are destroying the economy.

    Ryan is wise to their game and frequently calls them on it. When challenged all they can do is cry fowl that they got caught!

    For our side its high time to stop cry-babying about our team, get aboard and watch us roar.

    Remember if necessary we can always drag these guys across the finish line ala Palin style.She just showed what can be done in Texas. Its a mistake to think that we can’t do it nationally.

  • cactusjack

    took the lead. Then he decided he had to leave campaigning and go back to Washington to save the world – only he could do it – in that budget deal. Asit turns out, the world was not saved, but when he got back to the campaign his lead in the polls had evaporated.

  • renl57

    “The proposed E.U. Constitution is reminiscent of the American Articles of Confederation–which failed–only even weaker.”

  • renl57

    The Dems don’t even bother writing “Republican far right wing extremist” every time. It’s so automatic for them, they probably have defined hot keys or macros that just spit out the phrase “Republican far right wing extremist” every time they hit F6 on their keyboards.

    I often amuse myself by writing their own boilerplate for them:

    “Republican far right wing extremists are going to take this country back to the {insert decade here}. They want to deny women the right to choose and the right to free birth control. They are opposed to marriage equality….”

    How am I doing so far?

  • commonsenseobserver

    Barack Obama.

    http://nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/obama-and-ryan-similar-in-approach-and-effect-20120812

  • renl57

    If this election hinged only on Florida like in 2000, then Rubio might be a better choice.

    But Obama’s nonstop attack on Romney has driven up Romney’s personal negatives. That’s a problem nationally–and sure enough, Romney is now behind in FL and Ohio and other states.

    Even if Rubio delivered Florida, Romney could still lose Ohio and thus the election.

  • http://www.mtgriffith.com independentmike

    Every positive you mention about Ryan would also be true of Marco Rubio. Rubio would have done all that and more. He would have put the hispanic vote much more in play. He would not have brought the controversial Ryan Budget, from which Romney has already begun to distance himself. And Rubio is just as popular with the conservative base (and his conservative credentials are just as good as Ryan’s).

    But, Ryan’s the pick. I have absolutely nothing against Ryan. He’s a solid conservative and a smart guy. I just think Rubio or McDonnell would have been a better pick.

  • nepanyrush

    You state; “Do you really think most hispanics consider Florida Cubas as hispanic.”

    Cubans are Hispanic. And Rubio’s wife also is from Colombia, which is also Hispanic. Maybe you think Hispanics are only Mexican? My own children (and wife) are Hispanic, with my wife coming from Latin America when she was 19, and she may not be from Mexico, but she surely is Hispanic.

  • elayman

    n/t

  • renny

    At this point in 1980, Reagan was down against Carter, and we had 10% unemployment nationally, 10% inflation (credit cards invented the 18% card), and 12% and higher mortgage and loan rates, I had friends who bought a house in 1978 and were pleased to get an 11% mortgaged. And still Carter was ahead in Aug., 1980.

    Rasmussen had Romney up 4 pts. this week before Ryan, exactly where he had obonzo in Aug. 2008 against McCain, who was being nearly assaulted daily by conservatives swearing they would never vote for McCain (and often enough didn’t).

    But Romney needs more than Iamnotobama and less cons. snark. Reagan counseled not to attack out own and all cons. sites should do less vetting and more promoting.

  • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

    The old *** is running for another term and he’ll win in a landslide.

    If he did lose, Janet Nap would probably give him a job as a reward for endorsing her in 2002. Although she did drop an investigation of him right after the endorsement.

  • funwithknives

    he made mention of “The Three Dees”
    Debt
    Doubt
    [and] Despair.

    This may be construed as trite, but think for one minute about this “slogan”
    “Whip the Three D’s with Two R’s. Romney/Ryan,2012″.

    Fits on a sign and a sticker most efficiently and leads to people asking you what 3-D’s are.
    Am I being too silly here?

    I’m a ‘sensitive guy’, so be gentle please……..

  • acat

    There is a clear Cuban-American bloc -two, actually- in Florida.
    There’s some signs of a Mexican-American bloc.

    They’re not one bloc. Different cultures, different dialects of Spanish, treating ‘em as a bloc is silly, and yet is what both parties have tried to do for decades.

    Rubio did not help outside Florida, a State Romney appears to be within striking distance of already.

    Mew

  • streiff

    If you can’t get your head around that fact, and it is a fact borne out by thousands of political and marketing studies, you really shouldn’t comment.

    And I really don’t intend to argue this point with someone who doesn’t even understand the basic dynamics of hispanic voting patterns.

  • clintonformccain

    As I mentioned a while back, I was looking for a news aggregator/commentary site that was less anti-Republican than Red State. If I wanted to listen to “Republican pundits” bash Romney, I’d watch PBS or CNN.

    I’ve found that Hot Air is my go-to site for Republican spin now. I occasionally check in at Red State because a few of the commentators have intereresting reads on non-presidential topics. I really enjoy Steve Manley’s energy posts. And, while I don’t agree with Daniel Horowitz’ unbridled demand for perfection from Republican legislators, I enjoy his shining a light on Congressional larceny.

    I pretty much skip EE’s artcles and have since mid-way through the primaries, but his successive buckets of cold water before and after the Ryan pick was a little hard to miss. I was actually surprised. I would have thought that he would find a little glimmer of something to smile about with the Ryan pick, who seems to be generally well-regarded by fiscal conservatives.

  • Bill S

    .

  • kowalski

    I’ve gotten a big kick out of the Associated Press’ description of Ryan’s workout routine as “fiendish.” That sentence has been picked up by almost every major news organization in the country as part of their AP feed:

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=&source=hp&q=Fiendish+exercise+Paul+Ryan&oq=Fiendish+exercise+Paul+Ryan&gs_l=hp.3…1523.8506.0.9123.29.29.0.0.0.0.200.3653.7j21j1.29.0.les%3B..0.0…1c.cw12-sSqpM4

    “Ryan is also well-known for his fiendish physical fitness workouts.”

    FIENDISH!
    fiend?ish (fndsh)
    adj.
    1. Of, relating to, or suggestive of a fiend; diabolical.
    2. Extremely wicked or cruel.
    3. Extremely bad, disagreeable, or difficult: a fiendish blizzard; a fiendish problem.

    The guy is young, good looking and stays in shape, he exercises and maintains a healthy regimen, and you’d think the AP would describe him as living a healthy life — which would be an asset to someone who aspires to be the Vice President in case of an Emergency Presidential Succession Event – but no. Not for a Republican.

    When Paul Ryan exercises, he’s FIENDISH, according to the Dissociative Depressed.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The Clinton fanboi couldn’t resist spreading the old Clintonite anti-Newt talking points this year.

  • kowalski

    We know Obama’s “Social Darwinism” narrative which obviously the Associated Press was reading from when they wrote the announcement.

    FIENDISH physical FITNESS

    Count on a lot more from the Hive Mind in the next couple weeks.

  • ceili_dancer

    I would really be CONCERNed, but lines like that are like fishermen out TROLLing for bait fish.

  • streiff

    btw click a couple of the ads on your way out.

  • macbookben

    …could use him as a poster boy for her pet project “Let’s Move” campaign.

  • kowalski

    The LA Times (of all places) is now offering a much more balanced piece about Ryan’s workout regimen. They’re not going to be picked up in 10 million places like the AP sentence was, though.

    Truthfully Ryan should be applauded by people who like to exercise and stay in shape and challenge themselves. That should be perceived as an asset among our politicians and our country in general, one would think. Not something FIENDISH.

    Here’s the LA Times take – it paints Ryan in a positive light for taking care of himself and having a challenging workout routine. I’m sure Michele Obama would approve.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-paul-ryan-fitness-buff-20120811,0,3997794.story

  • califgal

    man next door, a man with family values….

    This was the right pick for a whole bunch of reasons, one of which is the middle class, which Obama has tried to align himself with, will see they have much more in common with Paul Ryan, son of Wisconsin, guy who is worried about the future of the country for his own generation and that of his kids, than they have in common with a community organizer from the big, corrupt city of Chicago.

    I’ll say it again–make a score of ads featuring black and white photos of Obama with Nan, Harry, and Rahm Emmanuel (did you guys see the black and white of RE during the Chick-Fil-a fiasco–man, he looked like one of Al Capone’s henchmen. I’d use that pic.)

    These are NOT people with middle class values or interests. They are people who pander to small interest groups to cull together a winning voting margin.

    Ryan is the Midwestern, middle class counterpart of Romney; he looks like the sons Romney and Ann produced.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    cock-a-doodle-do

  • macbookben

    …would’ve been issued were the selection Gov. Chris Christie?

  • acat

    feel free to steal.

    The major #Fail in GOP outreach to Hispanics over the last several decades has been a disproportionate reach in the direction of Cuban-Americans.

    I blame this on the shorter trip and nicer beaches in Miami vs. the longer trip and distinct lack of water at the beaches in Amarillo.

    Mew

  • clintonformccain

    If you recall, I was inclined to support Rick Perry as the primaries got underway.

    To his credit, though, Newt is out there working to elect a Republican president in 2012, which is more than can be said for some.

  • kowalski

    Unfortunately, because if Christie had been the pick, Candy would have been appearing on Saturday Night Live to do the skits about him. In a way that would have been fun to watch from a pure gawker standpoint.

    “I’m from the Garden State and I spend a lot of my time at the Olive Garden, but not for the free salad…”

    “My problem has always been my inability to see New Jersey once I stand up….”

    “You can call me fat if you’d like, but you’d be right…..”

    “Just signing legislation I work up enough of a sweat to irrigate the midwestern drought….”

    Stuff like that. And I *LIKE* Christie.

    He wasn’t going to be the nominee. I placed a very very low probability number on him from the beginning and it never rose above 5-6% throughout this whole process. If I had thought he was going to be the nominee, I would have said something here, believe me – because not only did I grow up in New Jersey I actually like Christie’s style.

    But it doesn’t travel well. If anything he’s “too” Jersey. It’s like asking Joe Piscopo to be the nominee. There are just some personalities you cannot transplant nationwide and probably shouldn’t. Besides, transplanting them would have taken several tractor trailers ***OH SNAP*** ;)

    Governor Christie, I say all this with a lot of love. Kind of like a roast.

  • kowalski

    Christie has enough trouble as the Big Man in Jersey and he’s got a lot of good work to finish there. I actually believed him more than anyone else when he said he wasn’t seriously considering it, wasn’t interested, it.

    I really believe he LIKES being the Governor of New Jersey and I hope he continues to BE the Governor of New Jersey. His brand of “back in your face” stuff just doesn’t travel well, though. It’s normal for a lot of places in Jersey, but elsewhere not so much.

  • kowalski

    They’ve all gotten themselves so tangled up with it that extricating themselves from it will be worse than going forward with it.

    That doesn’t change the fact that it was the wrong thing to do from the start.

    It’s like looking at a guy running a marathon who you KNEW didn’t tie his shoes and saying: “You’re going to faceplant.”

    They want US to pay for the faceplant.

  • SoFiMil

    “Not by Tbone, maybe SoFiMil.”

    Sure glad I wasn’t drinking anything or my computer screen would have been spewed with sticky stuff. : )

  • SoFiMil

    .

  • acat

    [no text]

  • surfcitysocal

    Looks like the old “electable” lie that voters swallowed during the early primaries is coming home to roost.

    Steve Deace on his website months ago said the same thing: that is, as many missteps and foibles as Obama has made, Romney should be way ahead. Moreover, if Romney loses, there is noone to blame but Romney himself and the Republican establishment that pushed him upon the electorate.

    Romney’s not the guy (or gal).

    As my husband says, it looks like Romney is just happy and awed to have made it to the World Series, but really doesn’t care if he wins.

    As for Ryan being a bold choice. Yeah, right. Zzzzzzz ZZzzzZ Zzzzzz. Wake me on Nov. 7th when Romney has lost by a landslide.

  • gekster

    So you like the alternative better?
    Obama?

  • APA Guy

    http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2012/01/09/the-2012-election-and-the-inevitable-mitt-romney/#comment-8410

    Good God…either get in the fight or go bake me some cookies. I’m well past fed up reading the comments of whiners on our side.

  • Tbone

    Now run along and quit embarrassing yourself and consider yourself lucky for finding a husband dumber than you.

  • Bill S

    Deal with it or get lost.

  • SoFiMil

    Originally read this thread as me (SoFiMil) being the “bad guy”/fall guy – in a funny, throw-away line by acat. Now I’m not so sure. Apologies if I came off otherwise. I’m cool with you, and got no beefs or cool sarcastic digs to give.

  • Tbone

    I just point out piles so people don’t step in them.

  • rabun1016

    McCain had an uphill fight and was also a bad candidate. But, in Romney, you have a hard worker and bright guy, and a clear opportunity to win this thing given the disaster in the country. No excuses.