« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Greater Risk. Greater Reward.

I expected Mitt Romney to pick Bob McDonnell as his running mate. I’ve said repeatedly that my two choices were either Bobby Jindal or Paul Ryan, but I expected Bob McDonnell. I’m delighted I got who I wanted and not who I expected. Paul Ryan is a daring choice.

I’ve talked to a lot of Republicans over the weekend and 48 hours after Paul Ryan stepped out at the USS Wisconsin to become Mitt Romney’s running mate, there is a rumbling of nervous excitement, but also some serious worry. There is a pretty clear consensus that Paul Ryan as the veep pick was actually a dangerous and very risky pick signaling Romney’s internal polling might not be so great in swing states. At the same time, everyone largely acknowledges that there is, in the greater risk of the pick, a greater reward if the Romney-Ryan ticket wins.

Why dangerous and risky?

First, picking Paul Ryan ties MItt Romney to the Ryan budget plan. This now turns the election into a choice between Barack Obama’s way forward and the Romney-Ryan way forward. The race is no longer a referendum on Barack Obama’s job. No one doubts Barack Obama has a better chance when the election is a choice between two competing visions and not just a referendum on his failure.

Second, it muddies the message. Instead of a race focused on the economy, we are suddenly entering a race about the economy and medicare, medicaid, and social security without being able to throw Obamacare at Barack Obama.

Third, because of the first two, Florida is now even more in play and several Republicans I talked to say it makes Florida more friendly toward Barack Obama. This relates to the senior vote and a suspicion the Romney team cannot competently execute counter measures against the coming demagoguery.

Why the reward if they pull it off?

Everyone knows what Paul Ryan brings to the table. If Romney-Ryan wins, suddenly they can make a real case for entitlement reform, smaller government, and debt reduction based on spending cuts, not tax increases.

Ben Domenech’s thinking sums up a lot of what I’ve been hearing and I share his thinking:

The decision to pick Ryan is not a safe one, however. And it is a definite break with the path that Team Romney has adopted to this point—one which adopted the sit-on-your-hands restraint Ryan spoke of in 2011 with such disdain, essentially attempting to make the first Friday of every month Romney’s running mate. And in accepting this advice and choosing Ryan, the Romney Team is indicating that they may very well be more desperate than they let on. This is not a pick you make if you are confident you are ahead or tied. It is the kind of pick you make when you think you are behind.

Because I do think Romney is behind—in the sense that if the election was today, I do believe he would lose—I think it is a selection worth the risk.

Most everyone I talked to was excited by Paul Ryan as the choice, but they all shared apprehension. The chief apprehension is very simple — there is a growing sense among Republicans that Mitt Romney’s team has a repeated and serious failure to execute.

Paul Ryan, as the veep pick, is a recognition of this. Romney needed to do something beyond a boring pick to get momentum back. More than that, Paul Ryan is a brilliant spokesman on budget issues and on economic issues. He understands the free market and is not afraid to zealously advocate for it and defend it.

The Romney team is going to have to sell this. They’re going to get hit hard on “mediscare” and will need to be able to nimbly counter-punch. Paul Ryan has several times in the past year already made the best case — Barack Obama has had one term and failed to even deal with these issues.

If the Romney team can execute a strategy that ties economic reform with entitlement reform, they’ll have a winning play against Barack Obama, whose singular achievement in office remains a failed healthcare plan that will wreck our economy and our healthcare system in the process.

Again though, tempering all the excitement many Republicans have over Paul Ryan as the veep pick is a lingering doubt that the Romney team really has what it takes.

COMMENTS

  • honor

    We need to talk about entitlement reform, so I say bring it on liberals! Medicare and Social Security (which Ryan was bold enough to support privatizing) desperately need reform.. We have a bunch of people that get way way way too much money from these programs and they won’t be here for future generations.

    It’s also great to have a candidate who is truly pro-life, I was really worried about
    Romney on this issue, and if he were to have picked a candidate like Rice, I might have stayed at home on principle.

    I am worried about a couple things. Particularly the mainstream left media attacking Ryan on his vote against barring Don’t Ask Don’t Tell because the media is sooooo pro-gay all of the sudden. I’m also concerned about how the leftist media is going to portray Ryan only showing 2 years of returns to the public. To be honest, I’m in the same boat as George Will, Romney should have showed several years of returns a long time ago.

  • honor

    One more thing. I have no idea why Romney is running away from a conservative masterpiece of a budget like the Ryan Plan. Even if he does fear the politics of it among independent voters (whom I think we can educate) it just looks bad to run away from the signature legislation of the running mate he picked. Besides, Obama and the left are going to tie Romney to the budget and run Mediscare ads anyways. I would hate to see Romney just let the MSM attack Ryan’s budget and Romney not even defend him. Is that possible?

  • bk

    Romney: “On day one I will work with Congress to repeal the $700,000,000,000 in Medicare cuts that Obamacare instituted.”

    Of course the cards are stacked against him. Obamacare includes hundreds of millions of dollars for AARP via the insurance you see commercials for all day long, so they are 100% in the tank for Obamacare. Of course if a Republican had voted to reduce future growth of Medicare by $1, they’d be saying he wanted to kill all the old people by eliminating their lifeline.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Into the arms of his plan with Sen. Wyden.

    But I don’t expect the two to agree completely on tax reform.

  • ctredstater

    Liz Cheney said it on Fox News Extra. this should be a “Marco Rubio” followup. To me, this is not that complicated.

    Get a clear message out

    - “no one over age 55 will have the plan changed”.

    - those under 55 will have a CHOICE, which includes standard Medicare “as we know it”

    - the choice is not between “as is” and the Romney/Ryan approach – it is between bankrupcty of the program or “something else”.

    then spend what is necessary on the airwaves – mobilize the grass roots, get the surrogates out – and have a consistent message in debates and on the stump.

    This Can, Will and Must Work!!!!

    .

  • renl57

    Romney was falling behind in most key states–not just one or two–due to the Dems’ nonstop character assassination. Picking Rubio might help in FL, or McDonnell might help in VA–but Rubio would not help fix Romney’s basic problem nationally.

    Ryan is an *ideological lightning rod*. For the moment at least, the Dems’ blasting his Medicare plan is actually an improvement over their calling Romney a felon and guilty of causing a woman’s death. Because it puts the debate back on *issues*, and away from Romney’s alleged personal failings which is what is hurting his candidacy.

    In short, the media is now talking more about Medicare instead of Romney’s tax returns. From Romney’s perspective, that’s an improvement.

  • runner12

    might think. Among my friends, even those who are center to center-left, most all agree that entitlement reform is desperately needed. We can see that it is our generation who will be picking up the tab for all of this.

    If Romney lets Ryan articulate why we need entitlement reform and does not get in his way, they will win this argument.

  • rbdwiggins

    should remove any doubt that picking Ryan was the right choice.

    Conventional wisdom is dead wrong, imho. Entitlement reform is a debate the GOP should embrace this election cycle.

    Obama’s plan for Medicare ‘reform’ is Obamacare. Seniors shouldn’t be forced to face an IPAB inquisition before receiving medical treatment because $700 Billion has been stolen from Medicare under current law.

    I don’t agree with Ben’s assessment: “Because I do think Romney is behind?in the sense that if the election was today, I do believe he would lose…”

    Unless the polls reflect the 2010 mid-term demographics (Enthusiasm is not waining.) and are limited to likely voters, they’re simply propoganda. Seniors are not a monolithic voting block, and they’re filling the ranks of the Tea Party in ever increasing numbers. Apparently, legacy is rising to a level that is near or equal to self in the minds of many seniors.

    I contend that conventional wisdom is dead wrong. Entitlement reform has become a losing issue for Team Obama and the Democrats.

  • RichmondG30

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/147287/Americans-Divided-Ryan-Obama-Deficit-Plans.aspx?version=print

    Those 65 and older preferred the Ryan plan to the Obama plan (48% to 42%). The Hope & Change generation (or Gen 44 as Dear Leader likes to refer to them) are against the Ryan budget 53 to 30.

    I am not nearly as concerned about the Ryan budget dragging down Romney.

    Debt and the economy are not mutually exclusive topics. The former impacts the latter. Romney’s job is to tie high government spending to slow economic growth.

  • Darin_H

    Another way might be that Romney is far enough ahead in the internal polls that he’s thinking ahead to governing and actually doing something. I doubt that his polling has D+12 samples just to make it a toss-up race.

    Romney’s personality doesn’t strike me as winning just to win, he is a Mr Fixit – from his work at Bain in turning failed companies around to fixing the SLC Olympics. It’s what his programming is best at. So through that lens, picking Ryan as his #2 makes a lot of sense.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Didn’t make a 1/2 billion dollars by being stupid or lucky or living in a bubble. Romney made his money in an inherently risky business by taking measured, calculated risks based on hordes of data. I can guarantee you if Romney’s internal polling told him that Florida was lost with Paul Ryan – Paul Ryan would not have been the pick.

  • littlehouse18

    Not Ryan – he is fantastic and this weekend showed why people wanted him to run for the Presidency. The campaign needs to be agressively behind him – which I fear might not happen, if they are McCain people.

    Romney did a little waffle last night on Ryan’s plan which worried me – if he’s gonna boldly pick him, he needs to boldly support him. He also wasn’t too effective in countering Schieffer’s outright lie that the rich pay low taxes. If memory serves, Schieffer sounded like he was saying the rich pay less than other groups. Ryan seemed to see what was happening and jumped in to counter the lies. There is no politician better at handling the press. But can anyone defeat an avalanche of lies and deceptive editing?

  • http://lukos.com Ed54

    I would call it recognition of what has to be done to win; mainly, that Obama wasn’t going to beat himself.

    Sean Trende had an excellent piece in RCP about 2 weeks ago about the deicsion process of undecided voters. It’s well worth the read: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/07/25/to_move_polls_romney_needs_to_go_positive_114903.html

    The gist is that independents have already decided they don’t want Obama. Continuing to attack is not going to move the polls any more, because strong disapproval is already baked in. But they are not yet sure whether Romney is a better alternative. So now Romney has to win the second part of the argument, and make the sale that he will do better. Attacking Obama won’t do that; he needs a counter plan. That’s where Ryan comes in.

  • reclaimit

    Romney was going nowhere fast with a safe pick. His numbers in swing states were dropping, and he just hasn’t caught on as someone Americans trust. But Ryan reshapes the debate. It was a Palin like pick, but with substance instead of fluff. Who doesn’t think Ryan won’t destroy Biden in a debate? It will be the perfect counter to Romney vs. Obama.

  • reclaimit

    The only bump he’d been getting in the polls was the two days after unemployment remains unchanged. After that, he’d say something, and the bump was gone. His path to victory is still narrow, but with Ryan, he at least has some energy. I don’t think safe would have prevented an Obama win. Mitt needs Ryan to win.

  • rabidf16

    For Obama’s scare tactics to work in Florida (or elsewhere) it requires two suppositions that I do not believe are true:
    1) Seniors are selfish and do not care about their children?s or grandchildren’s future.
    2) Seniors are stupid and will believe the scare tactics even though the facts do not back them up.
    Ryan’s plan clearly does not touch current seniors. A voluntary voucher program for future generations scares the left because they know it will be better and few people will remain with the government run Medicare when a viable option is out there. If they believed Medicare was better, they would love this plan because they would ?know? that no one would choose the voucher alternative.
    I do not believe America’s seniors are selfish OR stupid. But Romney/Ryan have to believe it too, and set out on a campaign that takes advantage of a smart and unselfish senior population.

  • http://lukos.com Ed54

    The President is the boss. The VP supports him. When the running mate accepts the offer, he also accepts subordination of his policy preferences. Romney is under no obligation to incorporate Ryan’s plan lock, stock, and barrel, and would be foolish to do so. Ryan himself has revised his plan 3 times in 3 years. He realizes it’s a negotiating position, not a holy writ.

  • littlehouse18

    picking Ryan suggests you are behind his signature plan, which is relatively well-known. The Medicare portion is a big part of it. There’s time to finesse that, but you wouldn’t want to look unsure right off the bat.

    It was handled awkwardly. It wasn’t terrible , but the opposition will attempt to attack him on the basis of the Ryan plan no matter what. There is no shrinking from bullies, else they win. And Mitt hasn’t provided detail on how his plan differs. It needs fixing – will he do it? How?

    McCain’s people hurt his campaign by undermining Palin. I hope the same sort of thing doesn’t happen this time around.

  • http://www.BillBowenAuthor.com RightinSanFrancisco

    Romney is a great businessman and a strategist, but perhaps not great at making an argument on the front line. With Ryan he has hired the best person in the country to explain the rationale and details of his proposed economic policies – and the disaster that awaits us if Obama is reelected. Ryan has the stage to do that over the next three months – Mitt can be the CEO.

    www.RightinSanFrancisco.com

  • soljerblue

    and the burden of explaining the issues — one issue, really, because it all ties in for the future — will be primarily on Paul Ryan. He’s a great communicator because he has the facts, the big picture, and can, I hope, frame the issues in language people can grasp. He’s going to be like Canute, shouting into the teeth of some awfully big waves of shyte from the dark side. Or, Sisyphus comes to mind — it’s a huge rock, and a very steep hill.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Now we have an articulate defender of the conservative alternative.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    Perhaps Romney choosing Ryan indicates he agrees and intends to push things to a now or never moment. We’ve been dancing around Medicare & Social Security reform, out of control spending, tax reform, health care, mounting debt and other issues for way too long, not to mention the social ills we’re confronting. Let’s be the party that has an honest discussion about it and then offer solutions. If the uninformed portion of the American people reject common sense, then the rest of us can move on and decide what we’re going to do about our lives instead of this constant living on the edge waiting to see what’s going to happen next.

  • fightnright

    and I’ll bet if the budget/deficit issue was re-framed as ‘seeking solutions rather than flying blind’ – as in no budget for almost 4 years, passing an unread 1500+ page bill setting the stage for nationalized healthcare, etc. – far more reliable voters (i.e., responsible citizens) would opt for not only ripping the bandaid off, but removing our blinders.

  • westcoastpatriette

    not being able to have input into strategy! lol! We can all think of things that could or should be done or said and even though we may not want to admit it, I think we react too much to the other side’s attacks and strategy of mud-slinging which takes us down these endless rabbit holes of worry. It’s time to project confidence and stop overreacting to all the mud-slinging. I think Americans will respond to that.

    Let’s face it, I think most of the die-hards that come to RS become overly analytic and lose perspective as a result.

    I still think the majority of voters want to hear the truth, are not stupid, and will be able to see the need for the grown ups to take over after four years of the leftists driving us recklessly into spending oblivion. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out we are broke and the feds have overspent us into this mess.

    And I get really tired of the wringing of hands that Americans are becoming so dependent on the government that they will reject attempts to shrink entitlements. The only reason more Americans are dependent on the government is because we have a pimp in the White House who wants to keep as many people as he can under his thumb of dependency. Given a choice, most Americans will gladly escape the control of the pimp to live a life of freedom and self-reliance.

    End of rant.

  • remnant60

    How does ‘the message’ get muddled?

    “Second, it muddies the message. Instead of a race focused on the economy, we are suddenly entering a race about the economy and medicare, medicaid, and social security without being able to throw Obamacare at Barack Obama.”

    I think just the opposite…Ryan will get (in the next few days) slings and arrows from the left, and will deflect them by re-affirming his vision of what is and what should be. The only attack the left has against Ryan is Medicare, and the Budget.
    One ‘should’ be a non- starter, and the other they won’t touch. Unless they really want to provide fodder for our side.