« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Morning Briefing for August 22, 2012

RS MB CleanMasthead

RedState Morning Briefing

August 22, 2012

Go to www.RedStateMB.com to get
the Morning Briefing every morning at no charge.

1. Just a Reminder: Nikki Haley Remains Awesome

The Myrtle Beach newspaper brings word to conservatives nationwide that Nikki Haley remains awesome.

The Governor, who had a series of vetoes overridden by the state legislature because she dared to cut spending, has also wielded her veto pen and seen the legislature back down recently. But, what’s so awesome, is the tears shed by liberals. Get this — she, in the words of the newspaper, “unilaterally” dissolved “the S.C. Arts Commission and the S.C. Sea Grant Consortium.”

She also drew a line in the sand over pork barrel spending in the state, pretty clearly telling the legislature that the good times aren’t back yet and they need to not live high on the hog.

Just read this editorial and you get a great flavor of what’s going on in South Carolina.

People is policy and conservatives rallied to a great person. The result? Great conservative policy coming out of the Governor’s Mansion.

Please click here to read the rest of the post.

2. Obama assists Bain takeover at OMB and tries to hide it

It looks like President Obama is assisting in a friendly takeover of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by Bain Capital.

As you may have heard, earlier this year Obama picked Jeff Zients to lead the OMB. You might not have heard that Zients worked at Bain from 1988-1990. The Zients White House biography did not originally admit that fact.

Now Obama has appointed another former Bain consultant, Boris Bershteyn, to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), which is part of the OMB. Recognizing how awkward this is for Obama’s reelection campaign, Bershteyn’s tenure at Bain has been edited out of his official White House bio. This is an obvious and glaring attempt to hide Obama’s friendly Bain takeover of the OMB.

Please click here to read the rest of the post.

3. DC Circuit Tosses Out EPA’s Pollution Rule

Amidst Obama’s inexorable war on American energy, consumers, jobs, and prosperity, his EPA is in the process of promulgating 4 new pollution rules that will bury the coal industry and “necessarily” raise the price of electricity on American households. They are the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for Utilities (MACT), the Cooling Water Intake Structures regulation, and the Disposal of Coal Combustion residuals. The former two have already been finalized while the latter two are close behind. Today, the D.C. Circuit Court struck downthe EPA’s authority to implement the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule.

Please click here to read the rest of the post.

4. Radical Islam Joins the DNC

Starting at the end of this month the Democratic National Convention will open with a focus on Islam. 20,000 Muslims are expected to attend according to the Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs (BIMA), the national Muslim American non-profit coordinating the two days of events they claim are non-political. ”Jumah at the DNC” begins August 29 and will start with a Friday afternoon jummah prayer followed by other unnamed programs and events, leading up to the Islamic Regal Banquet. The following day will be an all day Islamic Cultural and Fun Fest which will include discussions on the topics of Islamaphobia, Anti-Shariah, Middle Eastern Crisis, Patriot Act, National Defense Authorization Act and more. The purpose, according to BIMA, is to attract national and international attention to the plight of American Muslims and to hold political parties accountable for issues that affect them. However, not all Muslims feel that BIMA represents them and M. Zuhdi Jasser M.D., Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, has expressed serious concerns.

Please click here to read the rest of the post.

COMMENTS

  • funwithknives

    It represents Wayne County, Mich. 29600 block of Plymouth Road, City of Livonia.
    I attempted to obtain Romney/ Ryan lawn signs and was told None are Available until September First, 2012.
    Furthermore, I was told in no uncertain terms that Phone and Office Volunteers are going to be The Only Recipients until supplies increase.
    This is also posted on the entrance door.

    This is so counterproductive, it defies imagination.
    How many want to scream their support from the rooftops?
    Why is engagement/support in a form many are used to, being screwed with?
    With all the Dinero being spent on Media Buys ,and Mitt in Planning for 4 years and more, where is The Sense in this?

    As for as I could tell based on office responses, this is MIGOP Policy. Higher-up is possible , but I did not bother finding out.

    Well,… The Policy is ‘kinda sucky’.
    Perform A Trick and Get A Cookie is for pets,,,and I ain’t nobody’s dog.

    Anybody else?

  • 6eorge Jetson

    He’ll be in Tampa next week, and he’s usually an effective speaker for our side.

  • commonsenseobserver

    http://www.lvrj.com/hottopics/politics/polls/august_2012_1_polls_presidential.html

    Romney almost even among Hispanics… Up by 5 among indies. Gender gap still needs working on, of course, and crushing Todd Akin would be a good first step…

    Our problem on Medicare is not with seniors or youths, but those between 35 to 65… Interesting.

  • checkmate2012

    office- Just Kidding! How stupid is that? Please complain on MittRomney.com as they are very willing to respond from my experience. I’ll do the same and hope all here do as more power in numbers.

    I know when I wanted a Ted Cruz sign they were only available on-line for $15; cheap in the end :)

  • funwithknives

    Robo call advisory. Did not know I was ‘so special’.
    Ticket obtained for me,myself and I.

    Gettin’ to the bottom then. Going to e/mail, regardless.

    Thanx for yur answer.

    Off to slay dragons….. in my own fashion. of course.

  • checkmate2012

    Sorry stole the Republic of Michigan from gekster! Where is that gek?

    Good luck and know you will fight the good fight! MI can turn Red with folks like you!

  • commonsenseobserver

    Ugh…

    Looks like they’ll have to re-schedule. Replace Huckabee with her?

  • commonsenseobserver

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444443504577599120307000312.html

    Also, NYTimes and Quinnipac have a new poll that shows little movement in OH and FL, with the same ridiculous samples. Apparently Mediscaring is still a threat in all of them, but the Democrats appear to be abandoning that line of attack (after claiming that Romney wants to spend too much money on Medicare- I wonder how that tests in focus groups). We have a gap to close on health care, and we really ought to be doing better on the economy. The convention will be key as well.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Now behind Air Claire by 10 points…

  • jimmyg

    I went to the Rasmussen web site and also googled it and I cannot find that poll.

  • commonsenseobserver

    The actual poll results have not been released yet… :P
    http://ace.mu.nu/

  • jimmyg

    nt

  • tnguy

    Hopefully, I’ll never have to share a foxhole with you.

  • acat

    The guys in the foxholes would appreciate it if the generals (and armchair generals) based their orders on reality, not loyalty.

    The reality is, Akin is in deep trouble…. but worse, he’s there because he’s a lousy politician… he can’t figure out how to say what he thinks in a way that people buy, and that’s kind of the job, eh?

    Mew

  • tnguy

    …..the other day. Are you calling for him to bow out as well? No fan of Akin, but that poll or any other has no bearing whatsoever on the matter, in my opinion.

    I find it hard to believe that conservatives are more concerned about a few words spoken in error by a goofball than the big gov’t liberalism of their presidential ticket and many of their leaders in congress.

    The problem with republicans and conservatives for decades is that they’ve been obsessed with winning elections, compromising in an effort to go to the voters….instead of sticking with their principles and letting the electorate come to them.

    And Akin should be a non-issue for Romney. “Crushing” him is just plain stupid. He made one comment, and should make none other. One of republicans biggest mistakes (and it’s still happening) is fighting on the democrats home turf. Romney should laugh at the next moron journalist who brings up Akin. And if Americans are more obsessed over the clumbsy words of a republican 95% of them had never even heard of, than the general state of our country, then the war – and the country – is already lost.

  • commonsenseobserver

    And there is no reason why we should not try to win the seat despite his silliness.

    We don’t demand perfection from our candidates. But perhaps those who have always done that in our party might want to keep quiet about that.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    but I just don’t see the endgame to continue to bash and batter Akin, here at RedState. He is the Republican nominee right now and we support the nominee. I can’t see where the Republic is not better served by Todd Akin being a Senator over the national chairwoman of Obama’s 2008 election. Though, McCaskill doesn’t admit that in nice company now; least it affect her re-election to rubber stamp Obama socialism in the future.

    Every Republican from Sarah Palin to Mark Levin to Erick Erickson to Dana Loesch to Rush Limbaugh to Sean Hannity to Paul Ryan to John Boehner to Mitch McConnell to Mitt Romney has said Akin was wrong and should get out. I mean if Obama goes there, seriously what else could be done to get Akin to resign?

    Breitbart said it best two paths, and in Missouri that path is Todd Akin so either support him enthusiastically or vomit and support him. Either way he is an improvement over Clair McCaskill.

  • commonsenseobserver

    1) Get him to withdraw by court order

    or

    2) Support a stronger write-in candidate, like Kit Bond

    Yes, there is something in Tennessee’s water supply. Did you all drink water meant for Memphis?

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Couldn’t a Santorum supporter say the same? This really is no different. Akin is the nominee; he was chosen by the voters in Missouri to represent them. For your plan to work, you’d have to believe every single voter in Missouri who supported Akin would abandon him for Bond. I submit that is not true. Two paths: Todd Akin or Claire McCaskill – that is the choice.

    PS: Water meant in Memphis is closer to acat in Illinois than it is to me in Kingsport, TN….so that can’t be it. :)

  • acat

    Look, Akin didn’t *just* say something stupid. If you actually read what I wrote when this broke, I said to give it a couple days and see what the impact is.

    The problem isn’t what Akin said, it’s that he’s a lackwit politician who hasn’t found a way to dig himself out of the hole he put himself in!

    Missouri should have been an easy pick-up for the GOP… and as for why it matters, I have several, but let’s start with two rather glaring ones.

    1) The Supreme Court.
    The next POTUS will pick 3 or 4.
    It’s the Senate majority who will decide their ideology.

    2) The power of the RINOs.
    Collins, Snowe, and to an extent Brown.
    They only have power if the votes are close.

    Brunner, Steelman, or a pre-self-inflicted-gutshot Akin would have affected both of the above…

    Further, your assertion that this “does not affect Romney” is pure naivete’ – this gives the libs in the media a question to keep asking Romney and Ryan… you’ll be sick of it by the end.

    Finally, this hurts the GOP in Missouri. How many MO voters do you think will vote Romney and then McCaskill? How many will just stay home? How many down-ticket (i.e. MO statehouse) races will be lost because Akin is an incompetent politician?

    Mew

  • tnguy

    Rush made a point yesterday of saying he was not calling for Akin to get out.

    But otherwise, you’re probably right. And I don’t really care if he wis or loses. If we’d stop worrying about the short-term perception of our candidates by moderates and the media, and focus on nominating and electing candidates who not only share our principles, but also have the conviction to hold onto them when it isn’t popular, we’ll win in the long run.

    It isn’t the socialists that have brought us to this point in history, it is our own compromise.

    Further, this is Red State. Isn’t everyone here taken a bloodoath to support Akin since he has the (R) after his name?

  • red_oakster

    Akin is 65 years old. He’s a big boy and he’s been in politics a long time. And he failed the most elemental test of a politician: He used words to tear apart his base of supporters. That’s opposite of what a politician’s rhetoric is supposed to produce.

    There are lots of social conservatives who take very strong positions and succeed. Rubio, Coburn, and Ted Cruz are just a few. And with a slightly better campaign in Michigan and Ohio this year, Rick Santorum would be receiving the nomination this week.

    Akin’s problem is that he’s a dim bulb and just how dim he is was not appreciated until his victory in the primary won him extra attention.

  • earlgrey

    We could use more for the barge traffic on the MS. I am more conservative now than I was when I moved here

  • Spartan4Life

    I want to win. Claire McCaskill is one of my least favorite Dems. She is the poster child for the phoney and corrupt “moderate democrat”.

    In his heart Akin knows he has made himself toxic. And yet he won’t step aside for the good of the country. I don’t get it.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Nothing like the Democrats’ stunts.

    But I don’t like relying on the goodwill of a majority Democratic court and Robin Carnahan.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    from the list and agree as you say (R) in the general still means (R) in the general…

  • emptybucket

    that race? I had great hopes for him but was quickly disappointed. Don’t live in Mass but would like to see a real Conservative in Kennedy’s old seat. Possibly Sen Brown has to walk that center line in order to accomplish anything.

    Just curious, your are a keen observer, did you see that he wasn’t going to be what he was portraying himself to be??

  • tnguy

    Not sure what you’re referring to. I find it hard to believe a conservative would resort to New Jersey-type polictics to try to oust a legitimately nominated republican candidate.

    Would God I could get that water into the rest of the republican party….

  • emptybucket

    networks are skipping her speech? I for one hope the cable news lets us see it. I like her.

  • Xasteius

    Hotair has more of an explanation.

    http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/08/22/missouri-voters-chose-akin-not-so-much/

  • Xasteius

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_senate_elections/missouri/election_2012_missouri_senate

  • emptybucket

    n/t

  • commonsenseobserver

    At least he’s unlikely to go around killing people or claiming to be an Indian princess.

    And he’d vote to repeal Obamacare.

  • acat

    I would agree that the voters in Missouri can make up their minds.

    However.

    The Senate – more than the House – votes for the good of the country.

    Please note, this has *nothing* to do with whether Akin is right or not. That’s not the question. The question is whether Akin is *competent* as a *politician*… and I don’t see any way anyone can make the case that he is.

    At this point, through his own incompetence *as a politician*, Akin has gut-shot his campaign… and further proving his incompetence, he seems unable to recognize the problem, let alone fix it. He’s gone into “hunker down” mode when he should be out re-defining himself.

    Further, because of the profile of the seat, the Dem sycophants in the media will surely ask every GOP candidate they can find whether they agree with Akin on rape… just to have a sound bite of the candidate saying the word.

    If Akin were a competent politician, he would not have fouled his nest. If he were half-competent, he would have eaten enough excrement to clean it up. Instead, he’s in hiding. He’s unable to do what’s necessary to move forward, but unable to bring himself to walk away and try again in 2014.

    This has *nothing to do* with rape or abortion, and *everything* to do with Akin being a 10-watt bulb when we need a 100-watt.

    Mew

  • rabun1016

    Bingo on all his points.

    Further, somebody who holds good beliefs in the Senate is of no value unless they can also persuade others to the wisdom of conservative values. Contrast Ron Paul w Newt, pre second divorce. Both were often right, but one was going on TV, radio, etc and saying things that made sense. Newt built a following by articulating common sense, things we all thought to be true, before self destructing.

    Akin now has close to the credibility of Sandusky, and that doesn’t do supporters of conservative values any good if our objective is to use logic and common sense to persuade other Senators and people as to the wisdom of following conservative principles.

  • acat

    I would rather win the Senate with Missouri, but .. c’est la guerre.

    The problems are many:

    Akin will be used to bash every other GOP candidate in a purple/blue district.

    Akin will be used to bash Romney/Ryan (I’ve already gotten several “Ryan wants to take us back to the 1900s” notes from my liberal Texan associate)

    Akin’s loss in MO will only increase the power of the RINOs in the Senate – they can only maneuver when the balance is closest to 50/50.

    Akin has proven himself an incompetent politician. He’s in over his head and needs to call it quits.

    Mew

  • adair

    If they could arrange for him and Ann Wagner to flip campaigns, he would likely be re-elected to his House seat; she would blunt the War on Women meme; his conservative votes would not be lost to the House.

    She’s a pretty savvy Republican operative and, unlike Steelman, is not beholden to those paragons of small government, the unions and the trial lawyers.

    I don’t remember: Did the entire Democrat party rise up like a pack of cards and come thundering down on Anthony Weiner? Could not the Republicans have left out the parts about … not that his remark was stupid, but that he is? Because he isn’t.

    Well, thank goodness, once he leaves the campaign the Dems will have to stop all references to the Repubs’ war on women. We won’t have to listen to that anymore. They’ll have to try to come up with something else, but they won’t be able to. It will silence them.

    Won’t it?

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Any other candidate against McCaskill would up 10 points.

    We are losing an easy win with Akin.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    It’s pretty clear that Rush laid out the obvious:
    - Akin wont win
    - Democrats are using Akin to create a campaign that accuses the whole GOP of being anti-women
    - Akin should consider the bigger picture

    It was clear what Rush meant: Akin would be helping the party if he withdrew. he’s not in the business of telling people what to do, just telling people the way it is.

    ” I don?t really care if he wins or loses.”

    Excuse us if some of us DO. Obamacare is at stake.

    “It isn?t the socialists that have brought us to this point in history, it is our own compromise. ”
    Letting Democrats win is a bad deal all around.

  • emptybucket

    I know Brown is definitely better than Warren. My question – was it realized during that eletion cycle that Brown wasn’t quite the Conservative many thought he was. Acat seems to be very foresighed and I was just curious if Acat saw that Brown was going to do so much comproming with the Dems.

    I’m going to go do some research about him wanted to repeal Obamacare. I remember having a rant at the TV a few months ago about something he said and need to go find it. Darn, hate this senior moment thing. Just can’t remember.

  • acat

    …will not likely be electing anything you or I would consider a Conservative for a long, long time.

    I knew Brown wasn’t going to be able to *vote* as a conservative and retain his seat – he would have been another Michael Patrick Flanagan.*

    Politics, emptybucket, is the art of the possible … and it is not possible for Massachusetts (or for Illinois) to elect conservatives. The Lib/Dem stranglehold is too tight.

    Mew

    * Flanagan, a Republican, defeated ways and means chairman Dan Rostenkowski in 1994… and lost to then-future IL Dem Governor (and The Apprentice contestant) Rod Blagojevich two years later.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    That Rassmussen Poll tells you as much. Thirty-eight percent told Rassmussen we are voting for Todd Akin on principle (really who is supporting Akin now lukewarmly). This number needed to be in the single digits for a 3rd party candidate to be viable. Once Akin made the decision to stay in, he is the nominee and our only chance to run off McCaskill.

    Now back to that Rassmussen poll, 48% are voting for McCaskill, call them liberal Democrats. Thirty eight percent are voting for Todd Akin call them hardcore social conservatives and folks disgusted by the attempts to remove the decision of the voters. Akin might move back 4-5% but he won’t move 30% and that is what a third candidate would need. This is why we are (R) in the General; the math is never there for a third party run. Now moving on 24% told Rassmussen give me another choice. Akin chose not too; therefore our only hope is a large amount of that 24% vomit and vote for Akin instead of vomitting and voting for McCaskill (and this chance >0; chance of successful 3rd party run = 0).

  • acat

    I would agree – firewall it off, ostracize the idiot *as was done back when David Duke ran as a GOPer* and see what happens.

    Because it’s the Senate, Akin has hung himself, albatross style, around the neck of *any* GOPer running in a purple State, as well as Romney / Ryan.

    It is acceptable, in a House race, for a candidate to be this stupid – how else to explain Ron Paul? It is only tolerable in a Senate race if the candidate does not get caught…. and Akin got caught.

    He can, at this point, drop out and go find a second career somewhere on his House retirement money.

    Mew

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    He has access to money (the reason he is in Tampa today); heis 65 years old in his last election; he has one of the weakest opponents in the history of opponents; he has the support of nearly 40% of the electorate with 1/4 indicating a vote for either would make them vomit so he has a hope that those with upset stomachs will break his way.

    Now if you accept that Akin is staying in the race, there is only two choices: Akin or McCaskill. Any vote against Akin is a vote for McCaskill. I am never going to stand up and encourage people to support McCaskill’s re-election. In addition, if Akin stays in: Romney/Ryan have to be able to state their position and move to the economy. I am confident that either can handle it (and reject the notion that voters ignore the issues they care about because of Todd Akin).

    If Akin gets out I’ll support his replacement, if he doesn’t I’ll support him. (R) in the General means (R) in the General.

  • JSobieski

    Akin is just another version of COD. Someone who has said foolish things. Someone who D’s will use to embarass and hurt the R party nationally.

    People should still vote for the R. Spend your campaign donation money outside of MO.

    Public attempts to induce his withdrawal are stupid at this point.

    If someone can find a viable write in candidate actually willing to give it shot, let us know. Otherwise, this ship has sailed.

  • civil truth

    My liberal acquaintances are saying that Romney will take us back to the 17th century! I just about fell off my chair when I heard that last Saturday – and that was before Akin.

    It’s hysteria time among otherwise intelligent folks. Very discouraging in terms of ongoing political discourse.in our country.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    “Obama wants to take us back to 1929″. He shut up….

  • emptybucket

    this one. Thanks.

    There is so much to learn here at RS. I was just thinking yesterday that I don’t even go to drudge anymore for political news. Haven’t even been to Breitbart lately either.

    Used to blog at other conservative sites but too many liberals comment and it always takes the conversation into name calling. RedState not allowing rude comments is pretty simple, wonder why other sites are not doing it as well.

    Anyway, great answer for the next time someone mouths off at me about how bad Romney is going to be for America.

  • emptybucket

    is going to be boring and is only going to cover 1 hour for 3 nights. The first night they are skipping all together.

    Somebody explain to me how this isn’t a type of censoring! Waiting to hear if they are going to treat the Dem conv the same.

    Any bets that the Democrat Conv will be covered more?

  • civil truth

    The networks will cover the two with equal hours, but limiting the hours affects the Republicans more as Romney is the challenger.

    That is, people have had plenty of opportunity to hear from Obama, but know Romney less well. The convention offers probably the most sustained opportunity for people to get introduced to him and his wife and the Ryans too .

    By limiting the hours, people get less chance for that.

    On the other hand, attention spans being what they are, more than an hour a day is probably too much anyway. At least the Republicans have been given notice that they need to have the “A” team ready for that hour.

    So I don’t find this too concerning – it also means less MSM commentary.

  • checkmate2012

    oil, we’ll all be burning dung for fuel and riding horses! Say goodbye to cars, planes and plastics.

    Romney said it, you can’t drive a car with a windmill on it!

  • checkmate2012

    yeah for C-Span! You can see the whole line up of speakers for both parties on their website already…Elizabeth Warren then Clinton- what a pair! I’ve never even heard of half of their speakers, luckily.

    Mobama to speak the 1st night. Let’s see if the networks cover her speech since their snubbing Ann Romney. I’m not placing bets :)

  • emptybucket

    to keep the household going if Obama is re-elected. Gas will go through the ceiling and he will drive the coal industry out of business and our electric bill is going to go through an even higher ceiling.

    have to draw a picture of a windmill driven car and send it out to Obama except he probably wouldn’t understand what it means…I’d have to go and explain it to him.

  • emptybucket

    too political here but we certainly want to hear everybody we can. Probably will have to employ the mute button frequently during the Dem convention or be driven to watch something else, but will give it a try. It is a good thing to know what your enemy is thinking, yes?

    I am going to pay attention and see if Civl Truth is right and the networks will covered exactly the same, I am in doubt but have become very cynical.

  • emptybucket

    will be watching CSpan during both. Guess we should admit our attention spans might be a tad bit focused. My question is why is so much of America not paying attention? Oh well, it will be what it will be.

    BTW everytime I read your quote from CS Lewis, makes me want to dig out the Screwtape Letters and read again. Think tonight I will.

  • civil truth

    …just that they would cover the same number of hours. That’s at least what the media are reporting.

    Everything changing for convention coverage

    Limited Convention Broadcasts Shut Out Ann Romney

  • emptybucket

    as someone who would vote his beliefs no matter what. It was foolish, I know. In the case of Massachusetts it is better to at least have Brown working toward some Conservative ideals rather than a Warren who is one whacky lady! She was an obscure figure politically and now probably has super name recognition, except anyone with common sense is not going to attach anything positive to her name so the recognition is reverse of what it should be for a politician.

    I like Scott Brown, just feeling disappointed. I stay hopeful for Ohio and Illinois. My state, New York, managed to go for Reagan in 1980. There’s always hope.

    Oh man, Bloomberg was just on TV talking about this mornings shooting at the Empire State Building. He is one inept man. Wait, not even sure he is a man!