You guys in the press who are reading this right now can be such shameless whores. I generally try to hold to the standard these days that if I wouldn't be outraged by George Chimpy McBushitler Halliburton and Darth Cheney doing something, I shouldn't be outraged by President Obama. And if I'd be outraged by Bush, I should be outraged by Obama.
But you journalists have such erections for everything Barack Obama does, you can't even summon outrage to report fairly on the latest b.s. from the administration over Obamacare. Is it any wonder so many people have stopped trusting you?
Under the latest round of Obamacare delays for companies of 50 to 99 employees, companies who embrace the delay can layoff, restructure, and hire part time workers, but only if they swear to the IRS they are not doing so because of Obamacare. This comes on the heels of a much touted CBO report that finds only anecdotal evidence of a shift to part-time work now, but expects a shift in labor among small businesses in 2015.
If George W. Bush had done that, Dan Rather would be marching on the White House with a pitch fork. Tom Browkaw would be calling for his head on a platter. Andrea Mitchell of that anti-Bush site would be calling for his impeachment. CNN would be interviewing Cindy Sheehan about the boundaries crossed by George and Dick. And — spare me the rebuttals — you know damn well the story wouldn’t be done in passing, but would be wall to wall coverage with your legal analysts, economists, and sour faced anchors all tut-tutting for several days.
"On what legal authority?" you guys would ponder. "Won't businesses just turn to lying," you'd speculate. You know you would. You guys soiled your shorts with giddy excitement over the US Attorney scandal when the President could hire and fire them at will. Heck, back in the day you guys took seriously claims that George H. W. Bush hopped aboard an SR-71 Blackbird and flew to Spain to negotiate with the Iranians and the mere claim was worthy of a congressional investigation.
Yes. You. Did.
But now, you'd rather have cocktails (pun absolutely intended for a good portion of you "journalists") with the President, jealously size up the competition in the First Lady, and wish you too could be a mistress when you see France's President and whoever the gal of the week is for him.
If this was George Bush telling businesses they cannot take advantage of an arguable unconstitutional restricting of law done without Congress's consent unless the businesses swore oaths that they'd lie if they need to downsize due to Obamacare costs, the media would start talking about impeaching the President in non-ironic ways.
But with President Obama, half of MSNBC still wants to have his baby and the women over there just want to be his mistress. Hell, France's President has one.
No, we don't need to impeach the President, but God help me I'd at least think the media might want to pretend to hold him accountable. It really is disgraceful.