« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Tim Murphy’s Love Affair with Big Labor

From the Diaries by Leon…

Keith Impink runs Westmoreland Electric, a small business in Tarrs, Pennsylvania which was founded in 1988 with two employees and a truck.  His company, now 65 employees strong, is the type of job creator we should empower to move our state and country out of these difficult economic times.

The painful irony for local job creators like Keith is their very own Congressman, Tim Murphy, has consistently voted to make it harder for small businesses to grow, thrive and prosper.

Small business can’t compete against Big Labor, and it’s tough to find a more reliable vote for Big Labor than Tim Murphy.  And it’s really no surprise why: Half of his top ten campaign contributors are labor unions.  In fact, according to a recent report, Murphy receives more money from Big Labor than all but six of his Republican colleagues.

And what does Big Labor get In return? Murphy enthusiastically supports all of Big Labor’s priorities:  forced union labor on government contracts, Davis-Bacon wages, and Big Labor’s favorite, “card check.”

Card check, legislation laughably titled “The Employee Free Choice Act,” eliminates the right of employees and union members to a secret ballot in union elections.  Instead of an anonymous vote, union bosses can coerce, harass, and threaten employees to sign a card as a vote to unionize.  This is an anti-worker bill, which is why 70 percent of employees oppose card check.

But it’s a nice deal for union bosses and politicians and a vicious cycle of political “pay to play.”  Card check increases unionization; more union members increase union dues; and padded union coffers help re-elect self-interested politicians like Tim Murphy.

Card check is a classic example of politicians putting their jobs before the jobs of their constituents.

Studies show that card check will kill as many as 600,000 jobs because as the government gives union bosses more power by forcing more employees to unionize, employers will be forced to lay off workers to pay for the increased labor costs.  Why would Pittsburgh want to mimic Detroit?

A year after casting this anti-jobs, anti-worker vote, Murphy reiterated his unwavering support for Big Labor’s agenda:  “On the Employee Free Choice Act, I voted for it in the past and I plan on continuing to vote for it in the future… Everybody’s got to stick together on this.”

Suddenly, after years of kowtowing to union wishes, Murphy seems to be changing his tune.  In a letter sent to Mr. Impink at Westmoreland Electric, Murphy writes:  “I did vote for [card check] five years ago.  But if it were brought up again for a vote in the House, I would not vote for it.”

Murphy’s hypocrisy led the Pittsburgh Tribune Review’s editorial pages to label him “a weasel.”

His flip-flop is no surprise:  my primary challenge has brought out Murphy’s never-before-seen conservative side.   Plus, the winds of political expediency are shifting as unions’ political power is waning.  Murphy is a loyal supporter of Big Labor’s priorities… until it becomes a political liability.

Murphy’s record on labor policy is unacceptable.   The people of Western PA deserve a Congressman who will put their job before his own.

The author, Evan Feinberg, is a Congressional Candidate in the 18th District of Pennsylvania, challenging Tim Murphy.   You can read more at www.evanfeinberg.com. 

COMMENTS

  • drjerry

    I don’t begrudge anyone for their political belief or position. That’s why we have primaries and generals, different makes of automobiles, different shapes of homes, etc., etc. I have nothing against Evan Fineberg; he and his wife are both good Americans and wonderful people. I do think this election is based on a certain level of vindictivness and vengence rather than facts and merit. Mr. Fineberg is being used as the vehicle to achieve a self-serving end.

    When Congressman Murphy was voting for card check and supporting the unions, the loudest and most consistently vocal group he heard from was SEIU. Until recently, the past 18 to 24 months or so, the conservative “tea party” movement didn’t exist. WE (I say we because I am one of them) were not there letting the Congressman know day after day after day what we expected of him. I’m at fault as much as the next person. Consequently, since the squeeky wheel gets the grease, and there was no opposition to the voices he was hearing, he leaned the way he felt supported.

    However, with the advent of vocal and constant reminders that we are out here and we don’t like the way things are going, the Congressman felt support from the more conservative side of the table. He went back and voted to rescind card check and has moved toward his base. Like it or not, that’s the ugly game of politics.

    I won’t bash or discredit Evan Fineberg, nor will I do it to Congressman Murphy. This is neither of their fault. It’s mine, it’s ours for wanting to enjoy the good life and waiting until the fox was in the hen house before we started demonstrating our strength. I’m now doing my part and probably bug the Congressman much more than he wants. It appears many, many others are as well because it’s bringing about the results we want. ‘nuf out of me and thank you for reading.

    sending note almost every day about how I think things should things I think should be something igh fT. pounding on his door and reminding him how we want him to vote, but the unions were – loud and clear! ‘s asonly e, ne;riI

    • drjerry

      I have absolutely no idea what I meant in that last paragraph after “…thank you for reading” but I promise I’m taking my meds!!!!

  • biagiobruno

    Your description of Keith Impink is what I would like to see in a member of congress. A private sector businessman in a job that doesn’t require a suit, who has to make payroll and get work done on time and on budget if he wants to get more work. And I bet he knows some IBEW guys personally.

    I know you will vote right on card check, but other than not being Murphy, which is a strong credential in itself, what experience do you have in the private sector that will help you understand what guys like Keith Impink put up with everyday.

  • http://evanfeinberg.com Evan Feinberg

    Go to www.evanfeinberg.com, and feel free to email me anytime with any questions. I don’t think you’ll have any doubt that I will fight for limited government and economic freedom..

  • DerKrieger

    How is Mr. Impink involved in this story? Is his business under threat of unionization? What was in his letter to Murphy that prompted Murphy’s response?

    Thanks

  • http://evanfeinberg.com Evan Feinberg

    …a job creator rightly concerned about the threat of card check, and sent a letter to his Congressman worried about the issue. He recently received a letter in response from Tim Murphy saying he is going to switch his position.

  • http://evanfeinberg.com Evan Feinberg

    http://www.uschamber.com/press/releases/2009/march/new-study-shows-card-check-legislation-would-eliminate-600000-jobs-2010

  • sciencenut

    I couldn’t find the source of your “study”.

    Is it just as bogus as the keystone pipeline project and its’ 120,000, oops we meant 6000, eventually 600 jobs?

    It seems like a reach. just wondering.

    kdmeares
    missouri

  • ihateliberals

    His biggest downfall that erases all the good he could do is that he sides with Big Unions. The card check bill is an egregious attack on the freedoms of employee’s to vote their minds. Unions, while in the early years of the 20th century have turned from being an organization for workers into a Political money machine. When they see a worker they don’t think of his/her welfare they see $$ signs. anything they do for that worker is accidental. Murphy is a Liberal Republican once known as a RINO. It is Republicans like him that are destroying the Party and will eventually bring it down.

  • sciencenut

    I tried to follow a dead link earlier to access the report.

    Here’s the other side:

    http://www.seiu.org/a/anne-layne-farrar-wrong-on-unions-and-unemployment.php

    It’s a shame that everything is reduced to pundit spin. Having looked a little at Dr. Farrar’s bio, and of course knowing the seiu is a biased source, I am not going to enter anything into the personal database. Both these sources are just confirmation bias for one viewpoint or th other.

    I do not accept the premise of the argument. I do not reject it but find it quite hyperbolic. I hope we do not create public policy on such thin foundations.

    thanks,
    kdmeares
    missouri

  • sciencenut

    Are you auditioning for a right wing radio job?

    I know the forum posting rules on redstate require sycophancy, but they do not require hatred.

    Only your fellow acolytes care about what you say. You diminish anything you say in an otherwise polite discussion by your choice of appellation.

    closet liberal, aka eisenhower republican
    kdmeares
    missouri

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Continue insulting others and people might decide you fail to display proper sycophancy.

  • streiff

    nt

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    The bitterness that seeps through at the the thought that, no, they were not treated by all as beautiful snowflakes after all entertains mightily.