« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Christine O’Donnell [R Cand, US Senate DE]: “Citizen Politician”

We really *don't* need to hold our nose anymore

[O'Donnell at a Townhall meeting Democrats don't like to attend anymore...apparently]

I had the distinct honor and privilege of speaking with Christine O’Donnell to discuss her candidacy and her campaign to fill Joe Biden’s old US Senate seat in Delaware. There will be a Special Election primary on September 14 the winners of which will face off in the General in November. Christine O’Donnell would be an outstanding addition in the hallowed halls of the US Senate, and she deserves a closer look; on the issues she means to fight over, and the way in which she means to perform her duties should she prevail this fall. She has to get past the worst Republican in the House first though…Mike Castle…who she “lovingly” refers to as the King of the RINOs and the guy that has gone “Left” 70 % of the time he’s been in that House seat. More on Mr. Castle at a later date.

Ms. O’Donnell impressed me early on during my research and interview prep leading up to our phone visit because of this sentence from her presser announcing her candidacy [emphasis mine]:

[I]f you want someone who embraces what the Founding Fathers envisioned; a straight shooting, qualified citizen-politician to go to Washington and serve, then I hope to earn your support.

During our talk I was even more impressed by her. We only had a little bit of time, so I kept my questions to three basic areas. I asked her to elaborate on that expression “Citizen Politician” which I’ve quickly become so fond of. I was also curious about her thoughts on the Tea Party movement and its ever-expanding role (and growing influence) in various campaigns across the country. Finally, I wanted to know what she thought her campaign was going to look like heading into the primary against Castle, and how she thought she could be most effective in utilizing the “Grassroots” effort that is lining up behind her candidacy.

My conversation with who I personally hope becomes the next US Senator from Delaware, Christine O’Donnell, is after the jump…

I prefaced my first question with the observation that, over the past 5 years or so, the so-called “blog world” has evolved to the point of enjoying a fair amount of credibility as writers, analysts, and (in certain circles) “citizen journalists” and that her choice of the expression “citizen politician” had a very familiar and comforting ring to it. I asked her to elaborate on what she means by that term:

We started back in ’08 using the term “citizen politician.” It means I’m not one of those people that is driven toward a political career. I’m not one of those people that has been groomed by backroom overlords, or that has been hand picked by the party establishment, or that has come from a political family or “dynasty.” I am not a “conventional candidate”…I am an activist and an advocate on issues, and I care about my country and what is happening to it, and I refuse to “sit this out” because it might be hard or require a great deal of personal sacrifice.

This idea of every day citizens engaging the political process has been epitomized by the Tea Party movement which is proving that anyone can get involved, take a stand, and get passionate about standing up for their country. People are starting to understand that it doesn’t take a great deal of “work,” just a love of their country and a willingness to sacrifice time and effort to participate in the process and make a difference.

I mentioned that the Tea Party movement has gotten a great deal of flack from the media and many on the Left…often-times being called racists or pitchfork-toting rednecks and crazy people. We both chuckled at that, mostly because she thinks it’s more of a badge of honor. I asked her about their ongoing role in this election cycle, and what impact she believes they’ll have going forward:

That the Tea Party movement is being demonized only proves that they are making a difference. No longer is control of the political process solely in the hands of the backroom overlords and the party establishment. I applaud them and the work they are doing to engage their representatives and fight to take their country back. I have spoken at several Tea party rallies and I love the fact that so many people are joining the effort. I met a gentleman at a rally recently that told me he goes to a LOT of them, and that my candidacy actually helped inspire him to become more active saying “I really CAN get involved.” It used to be that incumbents controlled the process but more and more people are learning that they really CAN make a difference.

She sees the Tea Party movement’s role continuing to evolve and expand in the months ahead – moving past the protest signs and IN to the campaign offices – and believes it is the every day American willing to take on their politicians, at every turn, that is going to put this country back in the hands of the People where the Constitution has always said it belonged.

As we wound down our conversation, I asked her for her thoughts on the campaign ahead…winding down to the primary and on (hopefully) to the general election:

We need to keep hitting our benchmarks so we can keep executing our ground game. We have a good strategy, and this fight is winnable. I’ve been challenged by critics about whether – even if we prevail over Castle – I could win against Coons in the general. I say “yes, I can.” We have a strong grassroots effort here in Delaware which is on the ground and growing every day.

This is a fight for the heart and soul of not only the Country but the Republican party as well. We’re fighting against the worst “Republican” in recent memory. He has sided with the Democrats 70% of the time, and gets a failing grade from a host of organizations including the NRA, CFG, and many others. Are we really satisfied with a liberal politician solely because he has an “R” after his name? I don’t think so. And, to take him out, we need to come together, get out the message, get people to the polls, and get the donations we’ll need to cross the state of Delaware to educate people on what is really at stake in this race.

We’ll go door to door. We’ll call phone to phone. We’ll send out all the literature we can in order to win this race. But, these things require postage and they require gasoline to drive across the state and talk to Delawareans…and these things will be paid for by donations. A $20.00 donation to O’Donnell for Senate is like $200.00 anywhere else…and if we can raise $300,000.00 we can fully implement our campaign plan; an efficient (and we believe effective) plan to put a true Conservative in Biden’s old seat.

Christine O’Donnell is the real deal. And, much like Scott Brown or Marco Rubio, or even Sharron Angle (to name only a few) she can win this thing with a little support and a little encouragement and a lot of on-the-ground, grassroots work like that which has been done to help others come from nowhere to win what skeptics insist on calling “unwinnable” races.

Delaware is not impressed with the shenanigans up on Capitol Hill, and neither is Christine O’Donnell. Consider supporting her campaign, and consider donating to her as early and as often as you can. Her latest campaign money bomb began today (June 9, 2010) and there’s no time like the present to get started on pushing her across the finish line in Delaware just like we’ve seen from Florida to Masachusetts to Nevada…and all points in between.

[cross posted from The Minority Report]

COMMENTS

  • indyjohn

    has been abysmal for years. My wife is from Delaware, and has been embarrassed all of her adult lilfe by the clueless clods whom the voters of the state have sent to Washington. Christine O’Donnell may give her back a sense of pride in her state that she has been missing for so long.

  • rrreaganite

    Christine will not win the general election. This is Delaware and she is a perennial (losing) candidate. This seat is about gaining the majority in the Senate. We can’t do that without Delaware. Mike Castle is way too moderate for my liking but he is far and beyond a better alternative than the democratic candidate Coons. She has ran twice and lost and in 2008 she gave Biden his biggest victory ever. Mike Castle is not perfect by any and I mean any means. But he is probably there for 55-65% of the time with us conservatives, compared to the 100% of the time that the democratic candidate would be with Obama. Don’t cut your nose to spite your face. Castle is trouncing Coons, Christine will be trounced.

    • redtillimdead

      O’Donnell is a young, bright woman. She should not be aiming for the top yet. She would be a great candidate for the state legislature. She has lost a Senate race twice, once in a primary. She can NOT beat Coons.

      • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

        .

        • ffc99

          just unwilling to fight for a mediocre candidate who cannot win a general election in Delaware.

          • Bryan McCarthy

            No one is asking you to fight for a real conservative if you would prefer not to. Just don’t fight for a an old liberal guy who voted for TARP and Cap & Trade. And who cannot win in 2010 because he is the embodiment of what voters are rejecting all around the country, a big spending old incumbent. Liberal republicans should simply stand down

          • rightwingdelaware

            Obamacare, the Stimulus Package and the repeal of DADT. Delaware also has over 100,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans. You can’t run a candidate like O’Donnell, especially after the expose the only statewide newspaper ran on her, and expect her to win in a general.

            As a Republican in Delaware, you have to run a perfect statewide campaign to even have a snowball’s chance. To date, she’s run nothing more than a trainwreck of a smear campaign against Castle, that started on the day of her announcement, when a staffer from her 2008 campaign was physically removed from the venue because O’Donnell was scared he showed up to tell the press that she still owed him money.

          • eburke

            move that ‘with us 60% of the time’ down to where it really is – more like 30% of the time.

          • rightwingdelaware

            he sponsored the Disclose Act. But what Castle put together had no exemptions.

            It amazes me that conservatives would be opposed to legislation that bans foreign money, money from TARP bailout banks, and other organizations that are funded by tax payer money, and pushes for disclosure of campaign activity.

            And according to the Washington Post, Castle votes with his party 87% of the time.

            He voted against Obamacare, he voted against the Stimulus Package, he voted against the repeal of DADT, he voted against a withdrawl date from Iraq, he was a vocal opponent of HillaryCare in the 1990′s, and he voted for every bill that emerged from the Contract with America…I could go on…but what’s the point?

            Meanwhile Christine O’Donnell’s campaign consists of nothing more than attacking Castle, accusing the largest newspaper in the state of “slander” and trying to avoid questions about why she lied in 2006 & 2008 about graduating college.

          • Aaron Gardner

            I am amazed at how some Republicans are all to willing to violate the 1st Amendment with these silly restrictions on political speech.

            Also, you can’t claim him as champion for the exemptions not in his draft of the bill if he then turns around and then votes for the bill with the exemptions. That would be a tad duplicitous.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            McCain-Feingold. I suspect many have now learned their lesson.

          • earlgrey

            Is that republicans that followed Bush’s lead.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            when the Speaker joined the beltway establishment by publicly calling out JC Watts for accurately describing Jesse Jackson as a shakedown artist, so enamored of the Clintons had Gingrich become that he wanted no controversy over Jesse’s seat of honor at a State of the Union Address next to Hillary.

            Bush was great at killing terrorists, killing the recession he inherited with tax cuts, judges etc, but he and the repubs caved to Teddy on NCLB etc. Bush didn’t try to build the GOP and was not driven by conservative principles on many issues.

            Now we are getting back to Reagan with a new tea drinking GOP.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            one of the main reasons I come to redstate is for your commentary, so don’t even think about the old “spend more time with my family” excuse for an indefinite Sabbatical. You are needed to quell the secesionists, etc

          • Aaron Gardner
      • JamesSmith130

        If this were John Carney or Beau Biden, I might agree, but Coons is only a
        proud tax raising leftie who isn’t really known.

        I wouldn’t say that O’Donnell can’t beat Coons.

    • acat

      Imperfect as they are, should both Republican candidates win their Senate races, neither will vote for a Dem for majority leader.

      That, as well as the seating of Republican chairs for all Senate committees matters quite a lot.

      Sure, they’re imperfect, but the primary was the time to fix that. Since we didn’t manage it, let’s now move on to the next problem – changing the guard in D.C., and we can’t do that without Castle and Kirk.

      Mew

      • Bryan McCarthy

        “Since we didn?t manage it, let?s now move on ”

        As much as the old liberals of the republican party in DE wish it were not so, the primary has yet to occur. When it does, there will be a great deal of howling from the RINOs.

        • redtillimdead

          And Castle won convincingly, at a convention, dominated by the activists.

          • ffc99

            because while Ms. O’Donnell might be a nice woman, Delaware voters know her history and know that she can’t win a statewide race. She’s simply not a serious candidate.

          • Bryan McCarthy

            Not so much. I participated at the committee level in the DE GOP for ten years. I have served as a delegate to the state convention. One time, when it appeared as if the party might choose an outsider, the county Chair came in and changed the rules as to how delegates were to be selected in order that the insider was nominated. That’s how it works here. Any real activists have been driven out of the official GOP out of frustration. It’s ok though. Things are changing.

            Go Christine, time to send more money!

          • eburke
          • rightwingdelaware

            Delawareans should vote for a candidate who talks about “conservative values” but lies to the electorate about being a college graduate, sued the only company in Delaware that ever gave her a job for discrimination, and hid her mortgage foreclosure from the voters in 2008 so she could run against Biden.

            She had a 2008 campaign staffer physically removed from her 2010 campaign announcement because she was scared he’d out her for not paying her staff.

            She refuses to answer questions about her personal irresponsibility to the Delaware press, and will only tell her supporters that it’s “slander.”

            And she’s running the dirtiest campaign in the state right now.

            Her entire campaign consists of angry, infantile emails about Mike Castle, but she can’t point to ONE accomplishment she’s had since 2004.

      • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

        Kirk already won his primary. But that is besides the point.

        See, we are trying to bring the country to the conservative side,not the wishy washy middle ground, or the left in Mike Castle’s case. If we ever want to get out of the mess we are in now, we need people with Conservative Principles. (and I am sure you thought that Angle would ever win her race either). See we are trying to bring DC back to the people, not the DC insider elite, take it away from career politicians such as Mike Castle.

        If we are ever going to try and get Conservatives elected, the time is now,not what and see what the tea leaves say and just pick the guy with an R behind his name. If we get Castle we will loose the battle before it has even started.

        • acat

          Look, I don’t much like Kirk. Don’t like Castle either. So what?

          The damn purists like you would rather see the conservatives like DeMint relegated to minority-party slots, no committee chairs, locked out of the bill-writing process by the Dems rather than accept that sometimes you *do* vote for the guy with the R.

          Castle won, decisively. There’s a slim chance that Christine can change that, and I hope she does, but there’s a time to be an idealist, and a time to be a realist.

          Purists like you are part of the problem.

          Mew

          • redware

            us sick!When is there a time for you principle-bereft party hacks to actually be an idealist,if it isn’t the primary?If you are a conservative,and from your stance here that is highly unlikely,you would want to do everything possible to defeat the likes of Castle.Don’t blame principled conservatives for the failure of the GOP to hold a majority status.It was moderate Dem-lite RINOs that turned Americans off to the GOP and insured the victory of the socialist one and his minions.If you don’t like us purists-tough-because we are taking back our party,and when we do-well you know what your choices are!

          • JadedByPolitics

            ….

          • rightwingdelaware

            What kind of “principles” does O’Donnell have when she hasn’t held a job since 2005? Or when she was lying to the electorate for 4 long years about being a college graduate?

            It’s easy to talk about “conservative values” and “principles” but the real test is if you can actually live by them.

            O’Donnell has failed that test.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        Cock-a-doodle-do over Clemson in College World Series tonight, and given that tigers are feline…..smile

    • Bryan McCarthy

      It seems the old boy smokey back room talking points consist of only this: “Ok, Mike Castle is the most liberal republican in The House. He has spent forty years living off and wasting tax payer money. He has a F rating from the NRA. He is pro abortion. He voted for TARP and Cap & Scam and voted against the surge in Iraq. But hey he can win.” Guess what, he can’t. Old Fossils like Castle with a voting records like that are dropping faster than wildlife in The Gulf.

      The only republicans who are fighting for liberals like Castle are in on the system and their paid college interns are out in force. If Castle wins in September, he will go down in November because he is the poster boy for an incumbent washington insider.

      Christine O’Donnell is a dynamic talented young conservative. It must suck for the old guys who have lived off the fat of the land to see their world tumbling down around them.

      • redtillimdead

        Show me that study. and no, Christine O’Donnell’s talking points are not a fact. According to the ACLU, Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) is the most liberal Republican. They have Castle as the 3rd most liberal Republican, for social issues. The ACLU is not big on fiscal issues, because Ron Paul is the 4th most liberal according to them. Fiscal issues matter in a Senate race, not social. Castle is as good as it gets in DE. You can support O’Donnell, I just hope you don’t mind Majority Leader Schumer come January.

        • Bryan McCarthy

          For those who’s eyes have not been blurred from time spent in the smokey back rooms of old style political deal makers; note, this is the best they can come up with. It’s sad really. Furthermore, it is wrong on two counts. DE was never as liberal as MA, and although Scott Brown is not a real conservative, he is light years to the right of Mike (Cap & Tax) Castle. Politicians like mike castle are falling everywhere. He would be the weaker candidate in November because HE IS a career incumbent politician who bears responsibility for the current economic disaster in this country. Hypocritical as it will be, Chris Coons will successfully portray himself as the anti establishment candidate running against the fat cat Washington insider.

          But really, one must consider the motives of anyone arguing for a liberal like Castle at this point. After September, if the old tax and spend machine wins the primary, one may make the argument that he should be supported. But at this point, why would one? There are only a few possibilities.

          • ffc99

            to the O’Donnell campaign? Because if you don’t, and you actually believe Castle would be a weaker general election candidate than Ms. O’Donnell, I’d like to get my hands on a little bit of what you’re smoking…

      • rightwingdelaware

        RealClearPolitics has Delaware as a “likely” GOP takeover with Castle ahead of Coons by 23%. O’Donnell polled so low she came in as “other.”

        Even if the GOP wins every Senate seat up this cycle, we’ll still only have 59. We need 60 to stop a filibuster, we’ll need 67 to override a Presidential veto. The GOP needs that seat to be a “win” not a “well we had good intentions.”

    • dwight

      Recently Castle got accused by the Delaware News Journal of becoming more conservative as he started voting with the Democrats on 6 out of 10 times. That is not a Republican…that’s not even a Republican that votes with us 55-65% of the time. He is a RINO, a Republican In Name Only. We don’t need another Arlen Specter. Castle is unacceptable. We as a Party have to start standing for Principles…not just who looks likely to win. If we stand for Principles and back the people who believe in our principles, we can make the underdogs win. That’s why I support Christine. She can win this thing, we just have to back her.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    CW

    • rightwingdelaware

      What a fool you are, O’Donnell gave an interview to Delaware’s Coastal Conservative Network where she says that as long as she doesn’t get a job, she can live off of campaign donations.

      You just paid for her next pedicure.

      • eburke

        If you’d have been around more than 13 days, and weren’t such a sanctimonious, arrogant douchebag, you would know that ColdWarrior has done more to advance the agenda of the real Republican party than you’ve ever fantasized about doing.

        I’d give you the whole list but there’s that thing about casting pearls before swine and I’ve got better things to do with my time.

        Suffice it to say that calling ColdWarrior a fool (ya know, the same guy who’s managed to get Obama’s comments about immigration reform to go viral) pretty much destroys whatever credibility you might have ever had.

        Get lost!

        • gekster

          And if he took the time, he would have known of CW’s
          Precinct Committyman project and the tireless effort he has put to it.

          • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

            Mini-Bite is decent enough contraction. It’s been awhile since RS has done any brutally hilarious name changes on offending users.

          • eburke
          • eburke

            on their whopping 11th day start calling people like ColdWarrior a fool is just stunning in its hubris.

            Wonder if arc_ut and utah-cares moved to Delaware?

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            the names of conservative philosophers! Sorry friend, couldn’t resist. I have that problem myself what with all the copycat gamecocks out there…smile

            But I have a larger point about the issues of longevity, credibility, ideas and name-calling. For that tune in here for
            more later

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            grizzled redstate veterans. Its not polite. I stopped doing it two years ago.

            Now that I have read the whole thread, I find I have less to say!

            I’m on medication today, seriously. pray

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
          • rightwingdelaware

            I live in Delaware, I know the candidates. I have posted the interview O’Donnell gave to a Delaware blogger where she states that if she takes a job, she can’t live off of campaign donations.

            Wait for her FEC report to come out, if she manages to file it. Her support will be from out of state, because she’s burned her bridges with conservatives in Delaware.

          • rightwingdelaware

            none of you have been able to refute or explain any of the facts about O’Donnell that I’ve posted. The fact that you have to resort to calling me out for using the word “fool” is telling.

            Refute the fact that she lied to us in 2006 & 2008 about being a college graduate.

            Refute the fact that she admitted to not getting a job so she can live off of donations.

            Refute the fact that she hid her mortgage foreclosure from the electorate so she could run against Biden.

            But since you cannot, instead you attack one word.

          • Aaron Gardner
          • rightwingdelaware

            This is an article that originally appeared in the News Journal, the largest and only statewide newspaper in the state of Delaware, it has a circulation of 100,000. There are 180,000 registered Republicans in Delaware, and 290,000 registered Democrats:

            http://www.simplelegaldocs.com/odonnell-faces-debt-tax-issues

            This is from a interview she did with a conservative blogger:

            http://thatselbert.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/the-email-who-is-christine-odonnell-she-wants-to-be-our-senator/

            This part is why her campaign donations are coming from out of state:

            ?I?m not rich, I?m not working, and it is perfectly legitimate for me to use campaign funds for my living expenses while campaigning?food, gasoline, etc. I can even pay myself a salary as long as I?m not working,? said O?Donnell.

          • Aaron Gardner

            Nothing in the articles linked is sourced … So again, you asserting things, or linking to others asserting things, does not equal proof.

            Try again.

          • aesthete

            I have family and friends in Deleware (mostly Dover, I’m afraid), and I’ve known this since ~2008, when she ran against Biden. It was plastered all over the local papers, and over there, she’s around on par with Al Franken, or someone of that level of unseriousness. The impression that the one guy in my family who went to see her had was that she’s nice and intelligent, but a thin-skinned prima donna who doesn’t really know what she’s doing. That sounds about right to me, and it sounds like right now, she’s banking on external support from her days as a socially conservative pundit of sorts. I’ll try looking for some links later, if you’re interested.

            BTW, how’d this thread get revived? :)

          • Aaron Gardner

            Specifically, one Ginger Gibson, who says her role model is none other than … wait for it … HELEN THOMAS!!

            See here.

            My role model is Helen Thomas. I try everyday to be unafraid to ask hard questions. And to wear red.

            I wonder what else I might find with a cursory google search of Ginger Gibson?

          • Aaron Gardner
          • aesthete

            You don’t trust traditional news sources, and you don’t trust good faith posters who live and have family there. You don’t have to share my impression of O’Donnell, but her issue with campaign debt, her degree, and the sexual harassment case are all facts, not subjective inferences. Inferences from those facts are appropriate (i.e., how important they are, what they have to do with the campaign, etc.), but the facts themselves are not disputed by any of the parties. There might even be a Youtube clip on some blogger asking about her debt floating around, if I recall. Not all candidates are created equal, and O’Donnell is one of the weaker ones running this time around.

            I don’t know who broke the story, and if it’s a liberal, it doesn’t necessarily follow that the story is inaccurate. Example: Mark Foley apparently was guilty as charged; that made the story all the more indicting. Since several sources (family, anecdotes, news, blog) have reported it as fact, and the O’Donnell campaign hasn’t said otherwise (they just say it isn’t relevant), I don’t see any reason to doubt these three facts as presented.

          • Aaron Gardner

            And no one has yet to link me to anything other than a piece written by a Helen Thomas wannabe.

            Also, if having campaign debt precludes some one from making your purity list as a candidate then I assume your list is really short.

          • rightwingdelaware

            It’s a newspaper article, not a blog post. The sources are the court documents from O’Donnell’s lawsuit against ISI, the judgment against her for not paying her college debts, and the foreclosure judgment against her. The News Journal article also sports an interview with O’Donnell.

            The Coastal Conservative Network’s interview with O’Donnell is an interview, the “source” is O’Donnell, but then she’s a proven liar so take it for what it’s worth.

          • eburke

            established family which has certan members who have again and again proved who they are by their words and actions and attacking one of its most esteemed members.

            The fact that you could do so a whopping 11 days after you registered tells me all I need to know about you: impetuous, sanctimonious, arrogant, self-absorbed, smartest guy in the room, disrespectful, and pompous (did I miss anything?)

            All those attributes were emodied when you typed the word ‘fool’ to describe ColdWarrior’s contribution because only someone who possesses all those atributes would respond in such a manner.

            So, Mr. Smartest-Guy-in-the-Room, your attitude is not only unlikely to win you many friends on here, it’s also likely to have a boomerang effect on your attempts to promote Mr. Castle. Kinda like I did give a rat’s hinder about who won the UT primary (as long as it wasn’t Bennett) until a bunch of people possessing pretty much the same personality profile as you got on here and as a bunch of one week wonders started trashing Lee on a daily basis. Subsequently, this fool sent not one, not two, but three campaign contributions to Lee and spent the last week contacting everyone I knew in UT encouraging to vote for Lee.

            You’re headed down the same path, Sparky.

            (oh, and btw, I must have missed your apology for demeaning and insulting ColdWarrior whilst not having a clue as to who he was or what an ass you were making of yourself. But I’m sure it’ll be forthcoming soon)

          • rightwingdelaware

            If it wasn’t for the “tribbles” the crew of the Enterprise would never have known that the grain they were carrying was poisoned, and that a Klingon was posing as a Federation official.

            I am happy to be the “tribble” who exposes people to the truth about Christine O’Donnell.

  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

    someone that votes about 70% with Obama???

    He is practically a Democrat, so he and Coons are no different.

    NO wonder the Republicans have lost the last 2 elections so badly with poor candidates,

    But But But he is a Republican. Yes but he is also a Liberal that is farther left than a lot of Democrats.

    • redtillimdead

      Gee, were so factual today! He voted with Obama ONCE on an issue, Cap and Trade. And its called representing your constituents, Cap and Trade is popular in DE, b/c it is one of the states that benefits from it. He will be miles better than Coons, but if you want Majority Leader Schumer, thats your choice.

      • Right Reason

        I’d LOVE to see your data that shows that Cap and Trade is polpular in DE.

    • rightwingdelaware

      Castle voted against Obamacare, the Stimulus, the Jobs Bill, and the repeal of DADT. He voted with Bush over 87% of the time.

  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

    * Supported SCHIP (HR2, 7/14/2009)
    * Supported Omnibus Appropriations (HR1105, 2/25/2009)
    * Supported Mortgage Loan Modifications (HR1106, 3/5/2009)
    * Voted Against Balancing the Budget in 10 Years (HRes 85, 4/2/2009)
    * Supported Hate Crimes Bill (HR 1913, 4/29/2009)
    * Supported Parental Leave for Federal Employees (HR626, 6/4/2009)
    * Supported Cash for Clunkers (HR2751, 6/9/2009)
    * Supported funding for Legal Services Corporation (HR2847, 6/18/2009)
    * Voted Against Missle Defense (HR2647, 6/25/2009)
    * Supported Cap & Trade (HR2454, 6/26/2009)
    * Supported funding for Planned Parenthood (HR3293, 6/24/2009)

    Where am I wrong????

    Or maybe you can look at this post from Delaware
    http://delawarerepublican.wordpress.com/2010/01/25/the-argument-against-mike-castle/

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      http://votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=26792

      but no, really now-why WOULDN’T we want this guy? We loves us some “go along to get along” politicians while we’re smack dab in the middle of the greatest fight ever to save what little liberty we have left.

      [facepalm] what was I thinking?

      • ffc99

        you don’t like Castle (I don’t think much of him either). But do you seriously think O’Donnell could win a general election in Delaware (and if you do, please explain why)? Because if you actually think she can win, I’ve got some beachfront property in Arizona I think you might be interested in…

        • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

          Rubio started out at 2 points and chased Crist out of the GOP and still you don’t believe in the people coming together to fight for the right candidate. Christie could NEVER take the Governorship in NJ…yet he did. Brown in MA, Angle now in Nevada…and still you assume that which there is still no way of us knowing.

          O’Donnell lost statewide races…yes. Lots of people lose them un til they win them. Winning elections is part money, part GOTV, and part being the candidate the majority of people desire to have in office representing them. Until you convince me she is a worse candidate than her opponent(s) I’m going to hold out hope, spend money, and support the grassroots effort on the ground there until she loses.

          Castle and Coons are both bad. It’s all but a D regardless which takes the seat. If O’Donnell fails it will not be for lack of effort and confidence that doing the right thing and losing is ALWAYS better than selling your soul for a “W” and getting nothing for your troubles.

          Keep your beachfront property…I’ll invest in the real deal with O’Donnell…even if that means she comes up short-at least I’m on the right team..

          • ffc99

            an attractive candidate? Can you point to anything “impressive” about her besides her stated policy positions or talking points? What has she accomplished in her life? What does she do for a living? Is there any reason for the people of Delaware to believe she’s up to the job?

            I’ve done a little reading and have learned she’s never held public office, and as far as I can tell her primary occupation the last 4 years has been running for office (unsuccessfully, I might add). I guess she’s also made a name for herself as a go to “far right” talking head who cable shows can call on to go up against a “far left” talking head in discussions on social issues (pornography, pre-marital sex and abortion appear to be her specialties). You know the kind of shows I’m talking about, the ones where the participants yell at each other and make silly, over the top statements. Frankly, everything I’ve read leads me to the conclusion that Ms. O’Donnell is not a serious candidate (so please don’t compare her to people like Brown, Rubio and Christie, serious candidates who brought tangible life accomplishments to their respective campaigns).

          • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

            Sharon Angle was at 5% in the polls just a month before the primary. Was she a nobody that we should have given up on????? She won the primary with the help of people like Eric Odom, Steve Foley and various Tea Parties, especially the Tea Party Express..

            Seems to me if we get our minds together we can bring about a victory over the established career politicians in DC when we actually get behind someone

            Or we can go fot he ho hum, party insider candidate and keep the taxes rolling along.

            You know which one I am going to go for. The person that will actually represent the people, not the inside the Beltway party hacks.

          • ffc99

            as she has some odd positions (my favorite is her apparent distaste for the 21st amendment), so I actually wish she wouldn’t have won the primary, but that’s beside the point. The fact of the matter is that Nevada can and will elect conservatives statewide (although I’m sure Harry Reid is pretty happy that Angle is going to be his opponent in November). On the other hand, Delaware is not friendly territory for far right conservatives like Ms. O’Donnell.

          • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

            I’ll stick with the best choice on principle and philosophy-regardless the notches on her political election belt. We just disagree here.

            Every Senator and Congressman was a freshman once…and every one of them had no National level experience until they did. O’Donnell will too in January 2011.

          • ffc99

            I guess you answered my question. The only reason you support her is because she repeated a bunch of conservative talking points in your interview with her. You clearly can’t point to anything else she’s done in her life (whether it be in public service or her private life) that suggests she is a serious candidate and up to the rigors of the job. That is why Delaware voters will overwhelmingly reject her in the Republican primary.

          • ffc99

            Dave is that conservatives should expect more from candidates than just the ability to talk a good game. We should seek candidates with real experience, intelligence and ability (from a broad variety of backgrounds). All the evidence we have available to us suggests that Ms. O’Donnell only offers rhetoric. These are not the kind of candidates we should be actively promoting.

          • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

            Castle and O’Donnell. Of course I can’t give you a list of her legislative conquests and political prowess…she hasn’t had the job yet. If you want me to say it again, I will-she has no legislative experience. The point is the same-she is better with no experience and the right talking points than Castle is with liberal Republican experience that has routinely stabbed Conservatives in the back.

            In case you haven’t noticed, across the country, people like Tea Partiers and run of the mill Americans want a change from what the Dems (and their willing accomplices like Castle) have been doing. O’Donnell says she will do things differently. I take her at her word, with no experience, FAR more than I believe that Castle has had a come to Jesus moment and will act like a Conservative if only we let him ascend to the throne of the Senate from his piddly little seat in the House.

            Sorry-I like leaps of faith-I’m on board with O’Donnell on this one-pragmatic political suicide notwithstanding.

          • ffc99

            accomplishments outside of politics? There are none. I’m fine with a political neophyte being elected to the Senate, but I’d want that candidate to have a record of achievement outside of politics that would suggest they have the ability to do the job. It’s quite clear to anyone looking closely at Ms. O’Donnell’s record that she simply isn’t qualified for the job. I’m not asking you to support Castle, I’m simply suggesting you spend your time supporting candidates in other races that actually deserve your support, because Ms. O’Donnell does not.

          • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_O’Donnell

            I appreciate the exchange…there’s no more productive dialog available on this issue. I’ll support my folks-you do the same with yours…just stay engaged in the ones you care about…these midterms matter for the future of our country.

          • rightwingdelaware

            worked her way up through the legislature, and had a long career before that.

            O’Donnell has had one job since she moved to Delaware at a conservative think tank and sued them for sexual discrimination. She dropped the suit when the think tank chose to fight her instead of settling out of court.

            I’d vote for Sharon Angle. Christine O’Donnell is no Sharon Angle.

          • rightwingdelaware

            O’Donnell isn’t viable. Her past financial problems, her sordid campaign history in Delaware, and the fact that she’s running the dirtiest campaign in the state will knock her out of the primary.

            She’s running as an “outsider” this round, but in 2008 she was the darling of the state party.

            Delaware is a small state. You can’t stiff campaign workers and lie about being a college graduate and sue a conservative think tank run by a former Reagan staffer and expect to do anything but LOSE.

        • gekster
          • rightwingdelaware

            will sit to the LEFT of Castle in the US Senate. But he was the right choice for Mass. and he gave the GOP the magic 41.

            O’Donnell is running as a conservative with no credentials in a North Eastern Republican state with over 100,000 more registered Democrats. She gave Biden the biggest victory in his political history, and that was when she was the darling of the state republican party.

  • redcometchar2010

    Hey everybody,

    I’m not one to take the side of RINOs. I supported Marco Rubio and I knew Charlie Crist wasn’t our guy before he jumped ship, but we have to face facts. I want a majority and we need every seat we can get. In 2013, I pray to God (literally) we get a Republican President. I hope one of his/her first priorities would be to repeal Obamacare. The closer we are to 60, the easier that is. Mike Castle would vote for cloture, would Coons?

    I respect everybody here, but sometimes I think a lot of you let the perfect be the enemy of the good. It’s okay to support a Rubio over Crist because a Rubio can win in Florida. It’s okay to support a Lee in Utah, because Lee can win in Utah. However, Delawar is not Florida and it sure isn’t Utah. Castle can win in Delaware, O’Donnell can’t. Castle is far from perfect, but he is fine for a Republican from Delaware. Scott Brown isn’t perfect, but he is great for Massachusetts. The Maine twins are far from perfect, but for Maine, they’re not bad. If we had a primary in Arkansas and it was a choice between Castle and a more conservative choice, I’d take the conservative in a second. Would I vote for a Collins or a Snowe in a Indiana primary, heck no.

    We have enough races to contest, without having to worry about more.
    Where would you rather spend resources, Delaware where we could have had a sure thing or in Penn helping Toomey, or in Ohio helping Portman, or Colorado helping Buck (we hope). I want conservative Republicans, the more the better and we should always fight for that, but sometimes you need people who match their districts. Castle matches Delaware. Is he a Pete DuPont, unfortunately no, but he will be better than what Biden was and what Coons would be.

    • Bryan McCarthy

      Actually Castle is the most vulnerable of all. He is the quintessential fat cat establishment politician. He has been wasting tax payer money for forty years. Yea, that’s just the ticket for victory in 2010.

      That’s why John Corzine won re-election in Blue New Jersey. Oh wait..

      • rightwingdelaware

        Castle was Pete Du Pont’s Lt. Governor, and he helped bring unmatched prosperity to Delaware during his years as Lt. Governor and Governor. Castle was a key figure in bringing the banking industry to the state, which lead to an unemployment rate of about 3% at a time when other states were struggling.

        There is a reason why Castle has won every office he’s run for, and that reason is that Delawareans know he has their best interests at heart. Meanwhile, O’Donnell sued the only organization in the state that ever gave her a job.

        We’re longing for a good conservative to vote for in Delaware. O’Donnell simply doesn’t cut it.

    • aesthete

      And as some others have noted, O’Donnell’s occupation over the past 4+ years appears to have been running (very unsuccessfully) for statewide office, and being a talking head. Chuck DeVore, longshot that he was, was a tangible candidate with substance to back up his claims of conservatism, ditto for Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley, et al.

      If O’Donnell wants to prover herself, perhaps she could run for state Representative. I’m sure that DE could use more conservative state reps.

  • http://www.reddogreport.com reddogreport

    What’s the deal with all the hot conservative women running for office in 2010?

    • Aaron Gardner
      • eburke
  • SirGladiator

    I don’t know why so many people erroneously think that O’Donnell ‘can’t win’ in the fall, its so obviously not true. This is our year, this isn’t 2006 or 2008 anymore. This is a year when Barbara Boxer can be beaten, that Harry Reid and Blanche Lincoln will be beaten, that Tea Party candidates nationwide can defeat, and are defeating, the RINOs and taking back our party. This is a race between a Conservative Republican and a very Liberal Republican. There is no doubt that the liberal Republican has a better chance to win the seat than the Conservative. There is also no doubt that if the liberal Republican wins, we get two liberals on the ballot in November and thus we’re guaranteed to lose no matter who wins, so what’s the point? I’m here because I’m a Conservative, I don’t want to nominate a liberal Republican just because he’s better known and thus has a better chance of winning. What’s the point of winning with a guy who might as well be a Democrat?

    I don’t vote against Democrats because I dislike the color blue, I like the color blue just fine. I vote against Democrats, and for Republicans, because I oppose liberalism and support Conservatism. Supporting a liberal, whether they’re a Democrat or a Republican, because they’re ‘more electable’ than their Conservative opponent is something that I would simply never do, because I’m a Conservative and that would go completely against what I believe in. I support Christine O’Donnell for Senate, and Im confident that she can, and will, win this seat if she wins the primary. Keep up the great work Christine!

  • snowshooze

    Ya know, O’Donnell is on the right track. She keeps trying, she has never won. But look at the RNC. They keep hedging their bets.
    So we lose our choice. Thanks to the cowards who are afraid to stand proud and declare their position.
    Look, no guts, no glory. God hates a coward. Let’s think about the Independents.
    Screw the Indies..they have no guts anyway.
    If the RNC would pull their head out, a conservative just might have a chance. I refuse to give them a red cent. I deal direct.
    Killing the RNC is my hobby. They are trying to rub me out so they can live the good life anyway. ( After all, it is their career )
    Again, if you feel you must compromise your ideals, be honest about it and vote Democrat. Ye sure ain’t no friend of mine. I don’t hang with sellouts.
    Is that poor judgment? Maybe. But I sleep well. I understand your psychology…it is just that it is worthless.

  • jasononeill

    For those that think that Christine cannot win against Castle and Coons, let me offer these points:

    Unlike 2008, this campaign is run much better and with more focus on a winning campaign strategy. There is a Web abd Social Media strategy currently under way to reach every voter in Delaware.

    There is blog exposure, locally in Delaware and nationally pretty much now on a regular on a regular basis.

    Castle has betrayed the electorate and Coons with all of his property tax hikes (that resemble New Jersey) is not liked at all.

    All of the work the campaign has done was on the heels of a Rasmussen poll in November 2008, that had Christine within 9 percentage points of the Castle and at the time Beau Biden brand. That was before Christine jumped into this race.

    Our country needs Christine. Delaware needs Christine. Let’s all unite and make that happen.

    • rightwingdelaware

      when she lied in 2006 and 2008 about being a college graduate and failed to pay campaign staffers and past campaign debt.

      The Rasmussen Poll that you cite has Castle over Biden. The latest polling is on RealClearPolitics and has Castle 23% over Coons, O’Donnell was relegated to “other” with less than 7% of the vote, and she shared that 7% with several other candidates.

      And Castle hasn’t “betrayed the electorate” he perfectly reflects the Delaware electorate. That’s why he wins by landslides ever election cycle.

  • actionsarelouder

    Citizen politicians – please check goooh.com

    Get Out Of Our House!

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • Locked and Loaded

    if this lady manages to win an endorsement from DeMint or perhaps…Palin.

    I think it’s ridiculous to paint her as having done nothing of note. She certainly hasn’t piled up the negatives like her opponent.

    • ffc99

      get endorsements from folks like Demint or Palin. I’d bet my house on it. They don’t endorse people who aren’t serious candidates.

    • aesthete

      she really hasn’t done anything of note. She went to college, kind of got a degree, and jumped straight into one-note punditry. She hasn’t had any real world experience at all, and hasn’t shown that she’s particularly good at running for office. She has, quite literally, done nothing of note, so it isn’t unfair or ridiculous to paint her as such. All I’ve heard from her are a bunch of talking points. Say what you will about Chuck DeVore and his candidacy, the man had a distinguished career in and out of politics, and wasn’t just one of the choir boys singing out of the Republican hymnal book.

      • http://amymillervrwc.wordpress.com/ Amy Miller

        I’m just curious as to what you look for in a candidate for Senate.

        Smarts?
        After attending Fairleigh Dickinson University in Madison, NJ, Christine was awarded a 2002 Abraham Lincoln Graduate Fellowship in Constitutional Government from the Claremont Institute in Claremont, CA

        Experience in politics?
        In the early 1990?s Christine worked for the Republican National Committee (under then Chairman Haley Barbour) helping to develop the marketing strategy credited with having had a key role in the historic ?94 Republican Congressional sweep.

        During her 20-year career, Christine has served as a social advocate in Washington, D.C., participating in regular White House and Capitol Hill strategy meetings and leading delegations to the United Nations to lobby on behalf of pro-family global policies. She?s successfully debated Cabinet members, lawmakers and international leaders.

        Ability to deal with PR concerns and the media?
        Christine has served as a marketing and media consultant to various clients, including: Mel Gibson; Natalia Tsarkova, the Vatican?s first female portrait painter; and non-profit organizations such as the World Education and Development Fund, a charity that provides scholarships to children in poor communities throughout Latin America.

        An effective communicator, Christine is known for her skill in winning over even those who disagree with her most. Liberal Bill Maher stated, ?I don?t know how many times you?ve been here but it?s always a good show when you?re on.? Even Democratic strategist James Carville was forced to admit of Christine O?Donnell ?Now, this is one hip woman,? on CNN?s ?Crossfire.?

        I’m not really quite sure what your problem with her is, aesthete. Do we want establishment candidates, or do we want a fresh perspective?

        • http://amymillervrwc.wordpress.com/ Amy Miller
          • aesthete

            Nice to see you! Thanks for replying, but TBH, I’m not sure how you see those as qualifications so much as resume-padding. She could have been the mother of Mel Gibson’s public image — or not. She could have masterminded the marketing strategy behind the 1994 Republican Revolution — or not. Those descriptions are less accurate descriptors that tell us what she did, and more ambiguous attempts to credit oneself with an unspecific amount of work in the 1994 campaign. It doesn’t tell us anything, and as someone who’s worked some HR positions, you get that kind of stuff all the time.

            What I know is what I see, and what I see is someone who’s still in debt from her other campaigns, who makes ludicrous, ill-informed comments of the sort that talking heads can make (but that politicians can’t), and hasn’t shown an ability to get herself elected. In short, she looks like the female, better-looking J.D. Hayworth, with less experience. TBH, I don’t have a problem with “establishment politicians” nearly as much as I do with non-conservative ones. Jim DeMint and Jeff Flake could peripherally be considered “establishment”, but I’d rather have them on my side than JD. I’m not a fan of Mike Castle, but Christine isn’t a serious candidate, will waste precious funds, and will depress conservative turnout when Mike wins the primary. (But then, I thought Al Franken would lose, too.)

            I’ll try to post examples of what I mean tomorrow, if you’re interested.

          • http://amymillervrwc.wordpress.com/ Amy Miller

            That’s the whole point of a forum like this, to debate the merits of a candidate, no? I just don’t require prior office-holding in my candidates; if I feel like someone has potential, I’m going to support them–especially during primary season.

          • http://amymillervrwc.wordpress.com/ Amy Miller

            I just feel like listening to your talking points, aesthete, is like listening to a broken record. Not good enough, not clever enough, not experienced enough…what exactly is enough? You have your own bright-line narrative laying out the qualifications of a good candidate, and I understand that it’s easy to hold to that narrative. But punditry, marketing, and lobbying ARE legitimate jobs, and they gave her legitimate experience; maybe not the kind of experience a governor/congressman/mayor would have, but experience nonetheless.

            I fear that if we hold to a bright-line, we will end up throwing a lot of excellent candidates under the bus, and be stuck with the business-as-usual sorts.

          • ffc99

            Amy, I’m not sure there’s much aesthete can say to you to change your mind regarding Ms. O’Donnell’s qualifications. I’ll just say that a critical reading of Ms. O’Donnell’s own bio on her website plus a few minutes of googling should be enough to convince most readers that she is a woman of little accomplishment (certainly not someone who should be elected to the Senate).

            I’d also like to bring to your attention the results of an investigation done by the local Delaware paper into Ms. O’Donnell’s finances (the News Journal (Wilmington), article dated 3/25/10, unfortunately the News Journal doesn’t make their archives available online) Here’s a summary.

            - O’Donnell has an almost $12k IRS tax lien dating from 2005
            - She has a campaign debt from her previous campaign of approx. $24k
            - She has an upaid debt to her alma mater of Fairleigh Dickinson. Because of this, Fairleigh Dickinson is withholding her degree (You’ll note that in Ms. O’Donnell’s bio she only states that she “attended” FDU).
            - She lives in a house owned by a campaign staffer. At least half of her rent is paid by her campaign donations.
            - A house she owned went into foreclosure. The house was about to be auctioned when she sold it to a campaign staffer.

            It’s my understand that Ms. O’Donnell hasn’t seriously disputed any of these allegations, other than stating some are misunderstandings (oh, and blaming Mike Castle for engaging in gutter politics…). Now are any of these facts taken alone a big deal? Probably not, but when dealing with a candidate possessing so little experience, it would be nice to know that she can manage her personal and campaign finances (especially considering this is a candidate who bases much of her campaign on attacking out of control debt spending…her personal record suggests to me that she should start by balancing her own books before she attempts to tackle the nations…).

          • aesthete

            If she’s the nominee, we should support her without reservation, for no other reason than that she’s better than the Democrat in the race. In the primaries, I first ask:

            1) Is she electable? I’ve been to DE before, have friends and family there, and they all say that while Castle is no gem, he can pull it off. In contrast, they say that Christine, while probably more conservative, isn’t going to pull it off. They point out the other failed candidacies of social conservatives ’round these parts, and point out that basically all of Christine’s public life has been about social and cultural issues. (There are others who live in DE posting here who think otherwise, but then, they seem to be of the “true conservative or none at all” variety, take that impression as you will.) As a note, pretty much all of my friends and family in DE that I talk to about politics, while staunchly conservative, live in Dover. (I first heard about Christine when she ran against Biden

            2) Taking as a given that Christine is electable both in the primary and in the general, I then look at what the candidate says he’ll do, and if there’s any proof that the candidate will do it once he or she is in office. I put my proof in the following boxes:

            First, I look to see if they actually care about what they’re talking about. That can mean anything from public (non-campaign) appearances, working with groups that hold those principles highly, etc.

            Second, I try to see if that candidate can do what he/she says he wants to do. If it’s cutting government, I look to see if they’ve cut anything in public or private life, or if they have experience coming up with a budget, or if they’ve worked in compromise-driven fields.

            In Chistine’s case, it seems like she cares a lot about abortion, pornography, and pre-marital sex. Besides the first one, I don’t particularly want our politicians involved. In the case of fiscal conservatism, I really didn’t know what her views were until she hitched her wagon to the Tea Party movement. That’s all well and good, and it’s very possible that those are deeply held views of hers, but I tend to put more stock in a person’s views when that person has articulated them for more than 18 months.

            Punditry, marketing, and lobbying, like community organizing, can be legitimate jobs, but in that same vein, don’t really tell me about a person, or about what the or she is able to do in office. Her job experience is directly comparable to Obama’s, and that’s cause for concern. (Personally, the only one of those I consider a real job, if we drop the political correctness, is marketing.)

            3) Assuming that a candidate isn’t particularly electable or experienced, you’re left with personality traits. On that front, I actually do like Christine: she’s said some nutty/illogical things, but she seems like a smart cookie, and a charming person, all told. One of my family members went to one of her town halls and said that she came across as likeable and smart, but in bad straits as far as her debt goes. As someone who’s pretty likeable and smart himself :P , I just don’t think that that’s enough.

            It seems to me that there are better investments that a conservative can make than a long-shot candidacy for a candidate with a record of losing, a non-distinguished record otherwise, and for a candidate who has said some pretty absurd things (btw, this goes for Rand Paul, sans the unelectable part, as well). She’s good people, but that’s not enough for me. I assume that you will be supporting her, so good luck, but I won’t be investing myself in this race, when there are so many others with greater bang for my buck. Have a nice afternoon, and good talking to you.

        • rightwingdelaware

          Smarts? She never got a degree from Farleigh Dickenson University because they had to take her to court to pay for her education.

          Experience in Politics? You have to go back 16 years to cite an example, and I’d prefer more experience than getting coffee for Newt.

          Ability to deal with PR concerns and the Media? The Passion was 2004, and the only references to O’Donnell working the PR on that movie come from O’Donnell. Mel Gibson seems to think that his own PR firm did that work.

          And O’Donnell was touting her illustrious TV time with Bill Maher and James Carville back in 2006. What has she done lately.

          O’Donnell can’t even NAME her PR company. And her media relations are a tad bit strained. She accused a reporter who ran a story about her of “slander” despite the fact that all of the reporters points were back up with documentation, and she refuses to speak to any media in the state other than a handful of handpicked bloggers who run sites with no hits.

          • Aaron Gardner

            So worried that you signed up for an account on a national blog just to talk baby about her.

            Sorry, but I think you are full of it, especially when all you do is make accusations and then play the victim when called on it.

          • rightwingdelaware

            I’m just surprised that a blog with the reputation of Red State would endorse a candidate like Christine O’Donnell.

            Why are you all so scared of the truth?

            http://www.simplelegaldocs.com/odonnell-faces-debt-tax-issues

            http://thatselbert.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/the-email-who-is-christine-odonnell-she-wants-to-be-our-senator/

            I had to admit that I made a huge mistake in 2008 by supporting O’Donnell. You should try it.

          • Aaron Gardner

            Then again. shills rarely do.

          • ffc99

            Aaron. If you’d have spent about 10 minutes researching this woman on the web it is clear she is incompetent. The links above to the Delaware News Journal were to sourced articles (biased or not). The fact of the matter is that Christine has never seriously disputed the accusations against her (if you’d spent a few minutes researching this, you’d realize this is true). Aaron, I really thought you were better than this. Sad. Very sad.

          • Aaron Gardner

            I looked at the linked articles, and I have looked into the writer who wrote them. That, in addition to what I have read of the candidates defense, lead me to believe O’donnell rather than a writer who attacks conservatives for a living.

            I honestly think that O’donnell is a better conservative than Castle could ever be.

            He voted for the Disclose act for goodness sake.

            You can be sad all you want, I’ll just be conservative.

          • aesthete

            She’s not denying her campaign debt and problems. All I’ve heard from her is that being in debt makes her position one that Americans can sympathize to. Similarly, her sexual harassment suit and lack of college degree as a result of debt obligations have not been denied and are common knowledge.

            If she were denying these allegations, it would be news to me, and would repudiate her prior comments on those issues.

          • Aaron Gardner

            a. I don’t think campaign debt is an issue.

            b. She filed a gender grievance and then was fired then sued for wrongful termination, until the debt made it to where she had to drop the suit.

            Now, since I am not making the automatic conclusion that she lied, it becomes easy to say that she quite possibly was railroaded out and left in debt in the process

            She seems to be doing well on the campaign trail as Haystack written.

            Maybe an upgrade is possible. Conservatism wins every time it’s tried.

          • ffc99

            Aaron. Do you think a woman who: 1) can’t pay her mortgage; 2) doesn’t have a college degree because she hasn’t satisfied her financial obligations to the university; 3) has campaign debt from a previous campaign; 4) doesn’t appear to have held a real job (other than candidate for office) for 3 or 4 years; and 5) used to make a fool out of herself taking ridiculous positions on shows like Real Time with Bill Maher should be a Republican Senate candidate? If you do, I seriously question your judgment.

          • ffc99

            but your defense (and support) of Ms. O’Donnell also makes you look a bit stupid…

          • ffc99

            we’re just worried about Red State embarrassing the site by endorsing her.

          • Aaron Gardner

            You’d know that if you had even been here long enough to be embarrassed by our actions.

            ;)

            Try some other means of shaming us into silence.

          • ffc99

            very well that RedState hasn’t endorsed her. I’ve offered my comments in an effort to make sure it doesn’t…

            And by the way, I’ve been reading this site since pretty much the day Mike K put it on the web.

  • fedsocdan

    Levin just had her on. Great interview; short and really effective. To be honest, I hadn’t been focusing on her, but man if she loses to Castle it will mean a lib dem gets sent to the senate. As soon as Buck gets the nod in CO I’m moving my resources to the O’Donnell campaign.

    • fedsocdan
    • rightwingdelaware

      Maybe all of you people who don’t llive in Delaware need to take a minute to review reality.

      Mike Castle has a proven track record of winning in the state. As Governor, he lead the state out of hard times and into prosperity. As Congressman, he’s voted against Obamacare, the Stimulus Package, a withdrawl date from Iraq, the Jobs Bill and a host of other bad legislation. He also has a long history of honestly dealing with the people of our state. And he’s no “liberal.”

      Meanwhile, Christine O’Donnell sued the only company in Delaware that ever hired her, a conservative think tank run by a Reagan staffer, lied in 2006 & 2008 about being a college graduate, desperately tried to hide her long history of personal irresponsibility from the voters, and is currently running the dirtiest campaign in the state.

      Castle holds a commanding lead 23% over the Democrat Chris Coons, while O’Donnell ended up in the “other” catagory sharing 7% of the likely voters with 4 other candidates.

      Delaware is also a liberal state, with the conservative republican population in two counties falling well short of the moderate republican population in the state’s most populated county. There are more registered democrats than republicans in every county, and every voting district except for 1, and 100,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans.

      Out of state people with little knowledge of our state, its history and its voting demographics should concentrate on their own races. Out of state support of candidates is always the mark of death in Delaware.

      • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

        or just go ahead and tell us you are a shill for Castle.

        By the way, are you proud of his Aye vote today on the disclose act?

        • rightwingdelaware

          The reason I came here was because I was floored that a blog with a reputation like Red State would endorse a candidate like Christine O’Donnell.

          • eburke

            5+ years of it’s existence, 11 days ago you decided to save RedState from itself.

            How magnaminous of you! Whatever would we do without you?

            To what address do I need to send the flowers and the thank you note?

      • Richard Mullins

        So I guess then the circumstances are against O’Donnell even thought she had a fairly good showing in 2008. After the Castle’s vote on the DISCLOSE act, it would be easy to use again him and the Democrat. You sound like a Donkey to me.

        • rightwingdelaware

          She handed Biden the biggest victory of his political career.

      • IJB

        Voting for DISCLOSE was the last straw, and just reminded me again why I despise Castle so much.

        I’d rather lose with O’Donnell than win with Castle.

        We’ll take the Senate back in 2012 one way or the other. I’d rather have people like O’Donnell there, and not have people like Castle, around when we do it.

        P.S. It’s not our fault your state is a cesspool.

  • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

    nt

  • handprop

    I donated to her because I feel she would be great for our country and she had no experience. I love the idea she has no experience, so far people with experience have been part of the problem. I don’t like Obama leaders who blame Bush but the problems with America didn’t start a year ago. I donate to people all over the country, the fact that they have no experience is one of my qualifications. I tell you what, walk down the street and ask the “average Joe” what they think about people with experience.

    NOTE: Donate to people you believe in, vote for people you believe in! When did that become such an issue?

    This year is the first time I have been active in politics. As I read all the comments it became clear why average people like myself never wanted to take part.

    Note 2: Calling ColdWarrior names becasue he donated to a person he believes in beyond stupid, if I were smarter I could come up with a more complex word to describe it but I’ll settle for stupid.

    Handprop