« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Judged By The Color Of Their Skin And Not By The Content Of Their Character?

Only Whites are racists...apparently...


[image via FaceFwd]

In his “I have a dream speech”, Martin Luther King Jr. said this:

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

In presenting Barack Obama to the Nation as a potential President, we were asked to judge him on the content of his character and not by the color of his skin (the dream Dr. King died fighting to fulfill). In Barack Obama, America was offered the first real opportunity to test whether we had moved beyond the terrible injustices of our dark past. Yet, upon his election…his ascension to power…we were asked to take off those blindfolds and see that he was, after all, a black man and that we should celebrate our passage (ostensibly through him) into an unbiased America; an America that had finally proven its ability to be truly color blind, to come to terms with the horrors of its past, and to finally overcome them.

It’s impossible to believe that President Obama and his Administration actually buys in to this idea that we have moved beyond race and into a new generation of a color blind society, when you consider the blatant reverse discrimination his Attorney General (yes, his African American Attorney General) Eric Holder has been pursuing in the name of leveling the playing field in matters of Justice. Holder, it would seem, is still judging people by the color of their skin.

Consider the latest news on the story about the “alleged” New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case first reported back on election day 2008. Check the video for yourself here…and then join me after the jump to find out why a white guy from the DOJ quit his job so he could testify before the US Commission on Civil Rights about Obama’s Administration, and his useful idiot Holder, and how they really can’t be bothered to worry about white victims of black-perpetrated crimes anymore. Apparently, suing a State for making laws the Fed refuses to enforce is way more cool than enforcing voter intimidation laws…so long as only black guys are committing them against white people at least.

It all starts with the story of two African American men standing outside a Philadelphia polling place (one of which is clearly holding a baton or pipe or stick of some sort). Whether they were members of the NBPP were immediately challenged by the apologentia in the liberal press…Talking Points Memo couldn’t get in the fray fast enough to suggest it was just a bunch of crying Republicans making hay with no basis. Malkin was quick to follow with a piece supporting what we can ALL clearly see in the video…and not long after that, even Bluey filed a report on the issue. Ultimately, even Philly.com came forward to acknowledge that it was the Black Panthers, but that no intimidation had occurred.

According to the Fox piece referenced above, “[t]he Bush Justice Department brought the first case against three members of the group, accusing them in a civil complaint of violating the Voter Rights Act. ” The very next sentence, however, is where things start to go badly:

The Obama administration initially pursued the case, winning a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panther members did not appear in court. But then the administration moved to dismiss the charges the following month after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree to not carry a “deadly weapon” near a polling place until 2012.

There are two things terribly wrong with this; winning a default judgement only to turn around and drop a “won” case is no way to run the Justice department…and allowing deadly weapons at a public polling place at some future date is just off the charts. And, no-I am not so stupid as to have missed the year these weapons will once again be allowed…the next time Obama will be named on an election ballot. How stupid does he really think we are?

[H/T Susannah's way excellent diary on the media bias angle of this story, and thanks to Kenny Solomon's comment in that thread, let us take a look-see at how the top guy in the Philadelphia chapter of the New Black Panther Party feels about white people...and decide whether we're cool with him having a deadly weapon in his possession the next time his hero, Barack Obama, will be on a ballot in the City of Brotherly Love:

It's clear this man has a problem with white people. It's equally clear that had a white person said or done the same thing he'd already be running his stretch of incarceration. That Holder doesn't see fit to put the blindfold back on, and let justice serve us all equally, it's plain to see that racial prejudice still only runs one way in this country. As the leader of the free world, allegedly, Barack Obama has let down not only the African American community, but the whole of American society by not jumping up and down and insisting that there is no room in this country for attitudes and behaviors like those of the New Black Panther Party members in Philadelphia. His silence...and his willingness to wink at the NBPP and drop the charges and tell them to behave for a couple years sends the opposite message; Barack Obama still sees only Blacks as victims of racial bias in this country and still sees only whites as the ones that perpetrate them. He has learned nothing.

J. Christian Adams, now ex-DOJ official (and white), testified today before the US Commission on Civil Rights and suggested several times that the DOJ showed hostility toward cases such as these, adding that "[w]e abetted wrongdoing and abandoned law-abiding citizens.” He also has an op-ed up at the Washington Times telling his side of the story. For the record, there is apparently a growing number of former DOJ people that are starting to step forward to say Adams is telling the truth. Check out Adams’ op-ed…it’s worth a read…if for no other reaon than this passage:

Most disturbing, the dismissal is part of a creeping lawlessness infusing our government institutions. Citizens would be shocked to learn about the open and pervasive hostility within the Justice Department to bringing civil rights cases against nonwhite defendants on behalf of white victims. Equal enforcement of justice is not a priority of this administration. Open contempt is voiced for these types of cases.

Some of my co-workers argued that the law should not be used against black wrongdoers because of the long history of slavery and segregation. Less charitable individuals called it “payback time.” Incredibly, after the case was dismissed, instructions were given that no more cases against racial minorities like the Black Panther case would be brought by the Voting Section.

I thought Obama’s ascendancy was the END of all this. Apparently, via the DOJ, it’s only the beginning.

COMMENTS

  • http://erickbrockway.wordpress.com/ Erick Brockway
  • Mike

    There is no such thing as reverse racism, reverse discrimination, or anything like that term.

    There is racism, discrimination, and so on — the term “reverse racism” implies a specific race, and is thus oxymoronic. It’s a small difference, but an important one. We must be as pure as Caesar’s wife, y’know :D

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      discrimination was always meant to reflect what whites were doing at the expense of or against minorities solely because of their race. After Civil Rights, it was supposed to go both ways, but historically when minorities did things against whites it wasn’t discrimination…it was angst against their oppressor.

      NOW, with all things supposedly being equal, the term is used to reflect when minorities do things against whites. I think it’s a fair term, and not oxymoronic given the history of the word and its original meaning…but I’ll take a compelling argument to the contrary…as I say, I can be convinced.

    • http://erickbrockway.wordpress.com/ Erick Brockway

      Discrimination, racist bigots exist in all colors, we just happen to be witnessing black on white racists, fed and egged on by years of race baiting by the Jacksons and Sharptons, the Farrakhans and now, it seems, the Obamas and Holders.

    • callawyn

      The other side controls the narrative too much already. This is a clear case of Racial Hatred, by a black man against white people.

      This doesn’t apply merely to the New Black Panthers.

      Eric Holder has proven himself to be, I believe continues to be in too many ways essentially a coward.

  • Raven

    The PA State Constable is the only person at any polling place permitted to be armed.
    Philadelphia doesn’t recognize Constables.

    I am a PA State Constable. I will not permit any of this garbage at my polls.
    I urge all other constables to take this duty seriously. It Is our most important responsibility.

    I urge Harrisburg to force Philly to accede to State laws.

    • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

      Philly thinks they are the end all of the State and the rest of us are their minions to support their failing budgetary practices. Until fast eddy is gone I don’t see anyone rushing to make Philly realize they are part of the State and not the other way around.

      As for dealing with that kind of intimidation: if your elderly parents are threatened or you are threatened by these bums and the police won’t arrest/remove them form the polling place then what resort is there to stop them? If the law means nothing to them and the law will not deal with them then either submit or remove them. Bring lots of friends if needed to make the polling place safe to visit.

  • gekster

    Yes. If you were a slave, then it should apply.
    But you would have to be over 146 years old to qualify.

  • Achance
  • Susannah

    The J. Christian Adams op-ed was just unbelievable when he said that some in the DOJ think of this as “payback time”.

    Oh, and thanks so much for the H/T. I appreciate you!

    Take care and have a good night. :-)

    X0X0, Suzi

  • penguin2

    We have actually gone from the race riots in the streets, where hatred and frustration were violently expressed, to an insidious process of getting back at mainstream society via the legal system. They worked for this day and applaud these moments. The same mentality is now in the highest echelons of government that allowed O.J. Simpson to receive the verdict in his murder trial in 1995.

    Another aspect of this is found in our Corrections Institutions and the public school system. I’m sure many have heard reports of the “alleged” discriminatory practice of more minorities in prison than whites, in proportion to the general population of whites.

    Unfortunately, the Liberal Dems refuse to acknowledge the disproportionate offenses committed by those minorities. We see this problem in the schools, where the Dems make the miscreant students out to be victims….more African-American kids sent to the principal’s office, than white, so they cry racism is at work. No, it isn’t. But the truth has been drowned out under the cloak of Political Correctness.

    Where does this take us? To many of mainstream regular Americans seeing that they will not receive justice, that the law is not blind to color, and that evil will triumph over good. That right will be ignored in favor of wrong.

    Never thought I’d see the day that my government would be party to this, though it has been years in the making.

    So with dismissal of charges, there is no further recourse? The Supreme Court? Someone ought to start filing discrimination charges on behalf of those that are becoming victims of this ignoring of justice.

  • Common_Cents

    Shabazzz, cut your hair and get a czar job!

    • mschmitt

      … and just left before that nice man had to bash their heads in.

  • http://aposematic.wordpress.com aposematic

    As long as the Democrats can get blocks of votes there will always be rascism in America thanks to race baiters.
    Wise up minorities, you are being used by the “elites” for their political and financial gain…stop being suckers!

  • romeg

    for individuals to compare themselves to others. Differences in genotype, hair color, eye color and, yes, skin color, height, weight, ethnic heritage, ad infinitum are all used in some way to some degree, consciously or unconsciously for those comparisons.

    But to institutionalize race differences as does the Democrat party is to institutionalize racism. Following the Civil War the Democrat Party came to be known as the party of Rum, Romanism and Rebellion; the second being a slur aimed at their support of Roman Catholic candidates.

    Today they should be known as the party of Race, Racism and Radicalism.

  • Pingback: Homepage