« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Christine O’Donnell…In Her Own Words

Part I: Don't *EVER* underestimate the power of "We, the People"

We’ve heard it said often enough throughout this midterm campaign cycle; “elections have consequences” and “every vote counts.” I would add…”and no matter how piously they might try, experts and pundits aren’t always right.”

This is because, by and large, no one can truly predict how people will react (h/t Sussex County Angel) and what they might do under the right combination of outrage, angst, frustration, and the general malaise that inevitably sets in when Government actions result in the suffering of the people it was elected to represent. Just ask Mike Castle.

The 2010 campaign cycle has been about many things; jobs, deficits, debt, and the generally depressed economy that has resulted from poor decisions and dramatic over-reach by the Obama/Reid/Pelosi agenda in Washington. But this campaign cycle is about something else as well.

It is about a reckoning with the American people.

Back when she was Christine “WHO?” O’Donnell, I was honored to sit down for a few minutes with Christine and discuss her candidacy for US Senate. I had seen her original presser in which she referred to herself as a “Citizen Politician” and discussed with her last June just exactly what that meant. Fast forward now, almost 5 months later, to the new Christine “She Can’t Win” O’Donnell…and my second interview. This time, we had much more to discuss…and a great deal of fun discussing it.

This lady is the real deal folks, and – yes – she CAN win (like she did in the primary against the unbeatable Mike Castle) if only people on her own [redacted] team would start doing the work necessary to make sure of it…including money, boots on the ground, and continued engagement with her campaign and in the national dialog about what’s at stake for our country going forward.

What I like most about Christine O’Donnell is that she really is one of us.

Candidates from all across the country have stepped forward this year and said *ENOUGH* and the booming collective voice of America has stood up and demanded a fundamental change…and not the one promised by Barack Obama.

We were made a promise in our Constitution, and Obama and the Democrats have been breaking that promise at every turn. The promise to respect our freedoms and our liberties. The promise to defend them whenever and wherever they are being trampled upon…and the promise that would defer to the better judgement and collective will of “We, the People.” One such US Senate candidate is making this case in Delaware…Christine O’Donnell.

Christine “She’s Going To Win” O’Donnell™ proved the experts and the elitists wrong by defeating the shoo-in Mike Castle. Everyone said the General election would be his to lose against Coons, and yet here we are with Christine having taken him out by 6 points. STILL, everyone says she can’t win. STILL people aren’t paying attention to the voices of the folks that will actually cast those votes in Delaware on November 2, 2010. STILL people are more worried about protecting their preconceived notions than about helping the people of Delaware send the right people to Washington to clean up Obama’s mess…

When I spoke with Christine, the first question I asked was this:

Back in June when you were Christine “Who?” you and I talked about your use of the expression “Citizen Politician” and what that meant. You’re past the primary now, having taken Castle out, and have become Christine “She Can’t Win” heading into the General Election. What are your thoughts, given what you’ve been through in this campaign…including the fights you’ve had even within your OWN party…about that expression and how it has affected your candidacy?

She responded that “this country needs Citizen Politicians”. She added that the “idea resonates with voters because, for too many people, politics has become overwhelming.”

All across Delaware, folks have told me how much they support my candidacy but, when I thank them and ask them for their vote, a surprising number of people have told me that they don’t vote. When I ask why, many of them have said they are too nervous or uncomfortable at the polling places. I have encouraged them to try…to go to the polls and to ask for help. I believe I have helped to inspire every day people…people just like you and me…to go out and learn about the issues and make their voices heard in the election. I believe this has played a major role in our winning the primary and also had everything to do with the record voter turnout.

Some have pointed out that they would like to be more involved but they just aren’t sure how…or what they can do. I think being a “Citizen Politician” has helped inspire more people to get out there and become more active and help put Government back in the hands of the people.

Personally, this idea of every-day Americans being elected officials gives more people reason to believe they are being listened to, that their concerns will be addressed in Washington, and that they might truly be able to engage directly with their Representatives. This direct interaction between Politicians and the People is exactly what Christine O’Donnell believes is necessary for folks to get engaged and stay involved. I’m just an anonymous schlub out here in the internet world, and yet my conversation with Christine was as normal as any one of YOU would have with even your own next door neighbor. Would that we had more Politicians in Washington that could do this with us.

As Christine points out, “Delaware voters are hurting, their families are suffering, and people that were never involved in politics before WANT to be now, and are getting more confidence every day that they really can make a difference.” She genuinely believes her campaign and her “Citizen Politician” candidacy has been a major factor in that shift with the voters.

She went on to point out that there needs to be a balance in the national discussion too. The media, for its part, routinely twists what she says (and other candidates in other races across the country) and that places like ours…and Conservative blogs and websites in general… are out there to bring some balance to this discussion. She further suggests that all of us, in each of our communities, continue to engage in the comments sections, and to look for places where we can volunteer our time and energy these last two weeks and beyond to help get out the message and get out the vote.

I couldn’t agree more. In fact, we laughed as I pointed out that I was under no requirement to be neutral here…and that I had every intention of showing my bias whenever and wherever I could.

Next up…Part II: The race itself, the distinctions between the candidates, and reflections on the Christine O’Donnell campaign when all is said and done. And a surprise little anecdote that will be worth the wait.

[Crossposted]

COMMENTS

  • seidaho

    Christine O’Donnell will lose.

    Delaware is not even close to a conservative state. Her message might resonate in Utah or New Hampshire. But, not there.

    But, fundamentally, she is simply too flaky to win..

    When I learned that she had been fired by a prominent, longstanding conservative group that was the last straw in my book. It was the lawsuit or the firing. It was her claim that they had interfered with her pursuit of a masters from Princeton — only she never was pursuing a program there. She filed a false statement on this. That was unforgivable.

    I’ll be glad when she is gone. Just don’t give her more attention or credibility.

    I just hope her loss doesn’t cost the Senate.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      if not, elect O’Donnell or sit out (and help Coons) and comfort yourself in the knowledge that you helped make things in Delaware far worse than they needed to be…because you are a superior judge of character and all.

      Just sayin’

      • smitch61

        Good one!

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
      • cactusjack

        post gave me creepy deja vu – it seemed like I had seen exactly the same text in a post in RS back when Christine beat Castle. Identical text. Maybe recycled today under a different moniker? I don’t know if you have the high tech or the interest to run a check on it, but I suspect auto-trolling.

  • seidaho

    There is enough good ones who need help: Toomey, Angle, Ayotte, Buck, Miller, Rossi, etc.

    I just don’t get why some conservatives embrace O’Donnell — she lacks the character to serve.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      and last I heard, we support Republicans in the general.

      • expatuae

        Fine vote for her, but sending her money is as good as sending Sestak money.

    • powertothepeople

      We do not abandon valuable and good candidates just because some idiot like yourself comes on this site and tells us to. We also never buy into BS claims when no proof is given. So how about next time you want to post, don’t Save us the ignorant dribble!

    • Viator

      This guy or gal is a troll.

  • bclarkj

    seidaho, Give me a break. I want a bit more evidence of this “lack of character” other than your 13 day old membership to this site. Can’t just simply take your word.

    If it’s simply your “prediction” that she’s going to lose then fine, but if you’re a conservative in DE, well I don’t need to say it.

  • tea4me

    …to be conservatives

  • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com Beaglescout

    The Gregory Brothers even made a song out of her first ad.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      .

      • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com Beaglescout

        “Stay in office, stay in office, politicians just stay in office. I’ll go to Washington and do what you’d do.”

    • Ditto

      I’ll be singing that all night. TYVM!

    • tngal

      Song was great and add ons at the end were nice too. Jimmy Stewart worked real well.

      • Flagstaff

        Every Republican needs to reminds us all that Democrats intend to pass a value-added tax, and Republicans won’t do that.

        Republicans will repeal Obamacare, and Democrats won’t.

        Republicans will cut spending, and Democrats won’t.

        And if that’s wrong, we’re all in deep doo-doo.

  • penguin2

    For too long the people of this country have been lied to and deceived by politicians who care nothing for The Constitution, and freedom and liberty for the people; it has only been about power for themselves. Saying someone can’t win, is really saying they don’t want them to win. I’ve always believed in the success of the “dark horse.”

    Christine represents a breath of fresh air. Your interview, brings her up close and personal to the people, the people who she will represent. Anyone of our party who is secretly dismayed by her candidacy, are really dismayed by being exposed to regular folk. They’re afraid that they might have to change their ways if enough citizen representatives of the people get into office.

    This is indeed a time for everyone to take a gut check and stand up and be counted.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      ..

    • HsvConservative

      Agree with you and your last line is what caught my attention. +5

    • eburke

      Even if Christine doesn’t win (and I still think she can and put $100 where my mouth is) she has already accomplished much for the cause of conservatism; namely, she turned the GOP Elite Establishment on its head, and the $1.5 million she raised in the 48 hours following her win proved to Republicans across the country that they no longer have to be held hostage to the money that is provided to them by said Elite.

      She has already changed forever the old paradigm of political funding from on high. For that *alone*, I am grateful to her.

  • davidf

    Christine is well-spoken and upbeat, and her policy positions are straight-up conservative and constitutional. Since President Obama will likely veto any significant legislation that comes from a Republican Congress, I think the biggest challenge for the Republicans over the next two years will be to constantly remind Americans of common sense, conservative, constitutional solutions as contrasted with the goals of the current administration. Otherwise, Americans may become disgusted with the Republican Congress, thinking that they didn’t keep their pledge to push for common sense solutions. I believe Christine, among others, has shown that she is able to communicate with average citizens. She is not an elitist, and many Americans respect that. We relate to her message, because we relate to her.

    Delaware and America need Christine in the Senate. (And, besides, do you really want the alternative? Taxman Coons?)

    This is an excellent article with wonderful insights into Christine the candidate — and the election in general. Thank you! Looking forward to Part II!

  • Jill1066

    I think some of the GOP bigwigs were foolish to vent their spleens on primary night with dark mutterings about her unfitness and how little support she’d get. They were disappointed because they felt Mike Castle would have been much likelier to win the senate seat than Ms. O’Donnell, and they wanted to win it. I do not blame them for wanting to win the seat. It’s not often we get a good shot at a Dem seat in a very blue state. However, the tacky behavior wasn’t helpful. Fortunately, Sen. Cornyn countermanded that the next day and offered her the NRSC’s help.

    Beyond that, I think we have to face the fact that Ms. O’Donnell is a very conservative candidate who has not overcome a very negative depiction in the media. This is unfair but it’s something all Republicans deal with. It might have been better if she’d been able to use some of the money that rushed in via online donations sooner to air serious ads pointing out what a weak candidate Coons was and how she had sensible views on the issues. She made a decision to “go dark” for about 2-3 weeks at a critical time. Sharron Angle in Nevada made the decision to try to stay on air and slug it out with Reid so she wouldn’t fall that far behind and as a result she stayed competitive and has continued to take in money.

    It seemed that Ms. O’Donnell did well in the first debate, and I think that must have helped her pick up her position. More advertising with a solid issues focus could help further, but there’s not much time to make up 11 points in a very blue state. We have a lot of close races in other states that offer a better chance to win. DE primary voters decided to risk having the Dem win by selecting a lesser known candidate that is more conservative than the state would normally accept because they wished to avoid having a more liberal Republican win it. That was their decision to make, but we all have to accept that this seat is now more likely to go Dem absent a true implosion by Coons. Maybe the gamble would have worked out if Ms. O’Donnell had the sort of fantastic resume that Marco Rubio has, but she is a more nontraditional candidate without the standard leadership experience. She speaks well and with conviction, Hopefully, Ms. O’Donnell can prevail with support from her donors, her loyal volunteers, and a very large wave of discontented GOP & Independent voters.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      First, take into consideration that the poll suggesting she is down 11 is a Ras poll based on 500 voters…and doesn’t take into account the turnout numbers in the primary…NOR does it consider (nor can it) the level of energy in DE AGAINST the Dem agenda which Coons has unapologetically promised to continue.

      Second, “can” and “can’t” win will be decided by the voters on the ground…NOT by the most popular polls. She had no chance against Castle and she beat him by 6.

      Rather than assuming loss…refusing to accept it would be a far better way to go. It IS,, after all, the sorta attitude required to overcome most any challenge we are faced with.

    • Ditto

      It is the People’s seat. If it can happen in Mass, where can it NOT happen? I don’t mean to speak out of turn. I know I’m not a political pundit or anything. But when Brown, in his beat up ol’ pickup, took Mass. I became encouraged.

      Take heart – things have changed. The status quo has shifted, I think. Seems so, anyway.

      • khayos

        It was the first time I’ve been proud of my state.

        (not really — we had some decent governors)

  • eburke

    And the same people saying that it’s not possible for her to come back from this far back in the polls are the same ones (on both sides of the aisle) who said she couldn’t beat Castle either…until she did.

    Oh, that’s right…they sound like the same people because they *are* the same people.

    Again, nicely done (and thanks)!

  • Aaron Gardner

    Can’t wait for part II.

  • californiagold

    It would give conservatives great satisfaction to see O’Donnell win, but in my opinion that race has received far more attention than it deserves. There are at least a half dozen races that are too close to call right now – conservatives need to focus on the races that can be won, this isn’t one of them.

    While few have noticed, the Alaska race was once a shoe in for Miller, but now there is a real possibility he could lose. More focus needs to a be addressed at that race, and Murkowski’s record.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      we are taking back the country-we need to pay attention to all of them No race is lost until the polls are closed and the tally certified.

      Miller/Murkowskii might matter, but honestly they all matter. and in Murkowski’s case, at least, we aren’t in danger of placing an Obama rubber stamp in that seat like we are in Delaware.

  • reaganauh2o

    and exposed liberal dogma when an audience of law students gasped in unison when they were schooled in that “separation of church and state” is not in the Constitution. Damn she has giant brass ones. She can be the one vote that puts a stop to the lame duck agenda.

    My gut is telling me she will pull it off. Her message should be that if you want to shove a burning pine cone up Obama’s wazzu for all the world to see…vote for me. It will be the shot heard round the world for phase 1 of the revolution. I can see Chris Matthews now turning white and blowing chowder all over the set when they call it for Christine. That will be the earthquake on the east coast generating the tsunami towards the west coast and the LSM will have to deal with it live for the rest of the evening with all of us watching.

    • janis

      I would indeed like to see him huffing and puffing all over the TV screen as he did on election night 2000. It would be lovely to watch him look like he had choked on a big old glob of his own words when he had to announce that the race has gone to Christine.

      Alas, old Dan is history and we shall have to make do with seeing the current crop of “We know SO much that isn’t so” pundits choke on their own predictions, fantasies, and elitist opinions.

      I can’t wait. Great job, Dave.

  • Massachusetts_Transplant

    Pat Toomey is in a dogfight with liberal Joe Sestak, Sharon Angle is on the cusp of knocking off the despicable Harry Reid, Joe Miller is barely ahead or tied with liberal earmarker Lisa Murkowski, Mark Kirk is slightly up over Obama’s best friend Alexi Gianoulias, Dino Rossi is within a point or two of liberal Patty Murray, Carly Fiorina is nipping at the heals of Barbara Boxer, Ken Buck is up and hopefully not blowing it against Obama rubber stamp Michael Bennet, John Raese is in a battle with Joe Manchin, Rand Paul is up but hasn’t pulled away from shameless . . . all that and we are still talking about Christine O’Donnell?

    Let’s face it, she is a bad candidate, likely to lose, and whether unfair or not is an unwelcome distraction for our other candidates across the country. Time to cut our losses and focus on seats that are actually winnable.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      ALL of these races matter-we aren’t onesy twosy shopping for scraps from the Dem master’s tables. We are taking back the whole country, one piece at a time.

      If she was a bad candidate…to the citizens of Delaware…Mike Castle would have been debating Coons…not O’Donnell.

      Apparently you don’t recall some of the other races in history that didn’t end up as the so-called experts had predicted.

      Since when did Conservatives give up fights just because the fight was too bloody? Oh I remember, 2006…and 2008.

    • Scope

      against Castle. Support the nominee that was chosen by the voters of DE, or, take your sorry sick comments elsewhere. Kos would love to have you.

      • khayos

        You transplanted from the People’s Republic of Cambridge

        • eburke

          …she just understands that if you can’t bring yourself to support our nominee, or at least keep your fracking mouth shut about it, maybe you should find a different sandbox to play in.

  • Massachusetts_Transplant

    Rick Scott, John Kasich, Meg Whitman, Bill Brady, Nathan Deal . . . redistricting, redistricting, redistricting.

  • laxconservative

    the best thing she can do is to continue to espouse fiscally conservative points and hopefully not make any more major gaffes. Even if she keeps it to a single digit race, that is absolutely a moral victory in a deep blue state like Delaware, and it should make the Dems sweat bullets the rest of election night.

    My major concern is that the TV exposure this race is getting may be causing problems for Pat Toomey and some of the GOP congressional candidates in the Philly collar counties. I hope that’s not the case, but I have a sinking feeling that there may be some independent support for the GOP eroding in those districts with the way the media is presenting the Delaware race, and that is being reflected in the recent polls showing Sestak potentially creeping back into the race.

  • David123

    and Delaware doesn’t have to elect a Marxist.

  • azaeroprof

    and I’ll say it again: There’s something about this woman that I really like.

    I would give up anything (well, except living in beautiful northern Arizona) to vote for her instead of John McCain.

    I don’t recall ever seeing anything in the Constitution that listed “x years of service as an elected official” as a qualification for HOR, Senate or President. There are plenty of “qualified” candidates for office who aren’t “qualified” to be the dog catcher, and much fewer “unqualified” candidates who are eminently “qualified” to be public servants. In my mind, it is commitment to principles and integrity that make the difference, particularly in a legislative office.

  • phenne

    Everywhere is need. Support who you can, where you can!

    Give where our lead dogs feel a need is present …. they have done the research, and know what the truth on the ground is …

  • proudmarinemom

    from the mind, reagan(goldwater) … there. Thank you.

    “The shot heard round the world” for Phase One of the Revolution!
    I love that. We should demand it. Why not?

    Every underdog in every race in America would be lifted on the shoulders of their cheering fellow countrymen singing:

    “To race with speed along the track,
    Break the tape and not look back,
    To never have considered losin’
    As if to win is by your choosin’
    To share one victory inspired,
    To win just once is their desire!”

    Meet us at the pub after. It will be a grand night.

    • proudmarinemom
  • mustangsally

    They know Christine can win, BUUUTTT, they are soo afraid of her. She speaks truth she speaks her mind, SHE cannot be bought. THAT is why they will not help her win. Also, they/established REPUBS do not like their little itty bitty toes being stepped on, they fear they will lose their credibility. Which isnt far off! The established Republicans had better step up to the plate and FULLY back her, or THEY lose ALL credibilty in my eyes. The power in washingtion is like a cancer, it is mestastic. it just wont stop growing. I SAY TO ALL YOU REPUBLICANS~~SUPPORT CHRISTINE IN DELAWARE!! SUPPORT AMERICA, AND STOP INTRENCHED DEMOCRATS AND REPUPLICANS. STAND UP FOR WE THE PEOPLE, STAND UP FOR AMERICAN FREEDOM.
    PRIVATE MESSAGE FOR DELWARE PEOPLE ONLY..PLEASE VOTE FOR THE BEST CANDIDATE. THE ONE THE WILL HAVE YOUR BACK.. NOT THE ONE WITH ALL THE INSIDE POPULARITY, NOT THE ONE THAT WILL RAISE YOUR TAXES.

    • proudmarinemom

      In addition to Moneybombs for O’Donnell, there should be Phonebombs to the offices of the Republican establishment every day from now until Nov. 1. We should DEMAND that they get their sorry butts over to Delaware and support this candidate.

      There should be banners hung from every highway overpass: “People of Delaware, All of America is Counting On YOU!”

      They have the opportunity to be heroes to the American people. They will be the rockstars of contemporary American History if they pull this off.

      Viva, Delaware!

  • rfpzzzzz

    If you can honestly look at 4 years of Dem congressional rule and 2 years in the WH and you wish to send Coons to the senate to double down on this agenda, I assume you are on the take , uninformed or nuts.
    O’Donnell is the DE vote to stop the Obama/Pelosi demolition derby. She is not seeking to run a giant corporation , she will be 1 of 100 and if a vote is too difficult for her to figure out, it should be made more simple.
    At each one of her supposed crazy positions on evolution, mice with human brains and now religion and the first amendment the uproar has caused me to do some research and learn a bit about the subjects. With each of these examples , I found she had a point.
    I have political headlines from back in the Johnson/Goldwater race and basically the Dems/media were doing the same “extreme, dangerous, crazy” shtick since I was a boy.
    I hope she can talk to enough people personally and convince them to take another look. I don’t see how you could vote for her opponent. This is the first election where I really felt the country’s future was on the line.

    • theBlur

      If you cannot win on issues, demonize your opponent as a crazy person, or a extremist, or whatever. However, they have Alvin Green this year, so . . .

  • theBlur

    You post finally convinced me to give to Christine’s campaign. I normally don’t contribute to races outside my state (TX) but this year, posts like this have convinced me to throw what little I can their way.

    I do think she can win, and I look forward to watching the MSM have major cows on Tues. 11/2 around 11 p.m. trying to explain just what went wrong in Delaware.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)
      • texasgalt
  • californiagold

    I’m in agreement with those who say every race is important. But I’m also a realist and see how the media focus on O’Donnell is tarnishing the conservative brand this year. She’s well behind in the polls, and at a time when there are at least a half dozen races which are close, it makes little sense to use financial resources in Delaware when those limited resources are needed in other states.

    One could say O’Donnell has already done her job, which was to rid the party of another rino. Maybe thats all we can expect in a state like Delaware.

    • speciallist

      who’s your team?

      • blooch

        And I swear if I hear the “She’s hogging all the money” spam one more time…

        • speciallist

          Coons will flame out soon enough…

          • blooch

            http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/larry-flynt/2010/10/

  • http://www.mysimplehomegarden.com tbaleno

    To me this seems like the MA special election all over. The Republicans didn’t give much support to brown until very close to the election. Everyone said he didn’t have a chance at the time too. The thing is, how many people are angry enough to vote in DE against the current agenda in washington? Is there still enough anger to make another state blush.

    It seemed she did really well in the debates. Maybe she convinced enough people to come over to her side or to take another look. A 10 point swing in the polls in one week should encourage people.

    As for her bringing down republicans because of the focus on her, I think that is dead wrong. Basically obama is on the news every night campaigning in one state or another. He is why the races are getting tighter. His approval numbers have gotten much better in parallel with the polls. He is energizing his base. I wonder if the same people that think O’Donnell is a drag on the PA races think she is also responsible for obamas approval ratings going up.

    Or do they think the media doing commercials for obama every night on the news has less of an effect on the election than O’Donnell being the republican nominee.

    • expatuae

      To support Sestak against Toomey, keep O’Donnell leading the news. That is the only way the Dems can win the suburbs of Philly. Voting FOR Sestak is a tough sell. Voting AGAINST O’Donnell and “crazy Republicans” is an easier sell.

      Then OB will move back to Philly city in the last week to fire up the city machine voters. That is the threat in PA.

      • eburke

        to vote for Sestak just so they can express how much they hate Christine.

        Riiiight!

  • californiagold

    My point is that ever since ODonnell won the primary, the national media, as well as some republicans, have turned her into a national joke. Instead of discussing serious issues, the attention on her relates to witches and other nonsense. The democrats, and their allies in the media, are turning the Tea Party party movement into a series of individual races based on personalities, rather than the issues. The strong republican candidates like Rubio can withstand this attention, whereas the weaker candidates have lost momentum from the primary season.

    As for Obama, he might help in a marginal way by getting the base out on election day, but he also hurts democrats chances because independents no longer support his policies. And each time an independent voter sees Obama, he reinforces why they no longer support him.

    • speciallist

      go read Vassar Bushmill’s post….

      then quit coming here repeating what “The democrats, and their allies in the media” are saying

      it doesn’t matter…start supporting her or STFU

  • Massachusetts_Transplant

    I am told to take my “sorry, sick, omments” to Kos, and californiagold is told to “STFU”? For what arguing that there are better canidates and other more winnable races that deserve our attention instead of O’Donnell? If anything its “Kos” like to shout people down.

    Sorry folks but not all canidates are created equal. Rubio, Miller, Toomey based on their accomplishments and life experiences are vastly superior to O’Donnell. Just because she now checks the right boxes doesn’t put her in the same league as them.. Again – if you have spare dollars or time, your money is much better spent in places like Pennsylvania, Colorado, Ohio, or Florida.

    • expatuae

      Some people here do share a leftist tendency- a belief in ideology over experience. Like, why does a communist economy not work? There must be a plot by counter-revolutionaries. Rigid ideology does not allow for questioning. Like if they just wish something to be true, they can ignore all evidence to the contrary.

      And there is sometimes a fine line between a visionary and a lunatic.

      • speciallist

        you both share that tendency

        • expatuae

          Actually, I think I have more of a clue about PA and DE than most of the people commenting here.

          Regarding conservatism, have you read Kirk?

          http://www.kirkcenter.org/kirk/ten-principles.html

          • speciallist

            http://www.redstate.com/expatuae/

      • expatuae

        And along those lines they will blame the media, the “establishment” Republicans, and anyone else other than their candidate. This is very similar to the victimology that dominates leftist thought. Or like liberals bemoaning that the proletariat doesn’t vote for the economic interests.

        Ignoring ideology, the media are market creatures. Journalists are human. They look for the maximum return for the minimum effort. If you serve them up 20 taped episodes of you talking about witchcraft, masturbation, and evolution on a left wing comedy show, don’t be surprised when it comes to dominate the public’s perception of you negatively.

        You don’t need to be a left-wing journalist to be a lazy journalist- the story writes itself!

        Is it fair? I’d say “No.” I wouldn’t want to be judged on rubbish I said or did in my 20′s. But life’s not fair and there is not a remedy for every wrong. Politics is about appealing to a broad base of people who pay a limited amount of attention and form quick judgements about people. That’s the game. Don’t complain about the rules.

        • khayos

          Do you vote Democrat or Republican?

          • expatuae

            Never voted for a Dem in my life. Nor do I expect to.

    • eburke

      candidates can’t win, or telling people that it is “stupid” to send her money, isn’t debate…it’s the stuff of Fifth Columnists.

      If you don’t think Christine can win, fine. Put your efforts elsewhere. Otherwise, follow the adage that hopefully you learned from your mother – if you can’t say something nice, STFU.

      The rest of us will soldier on in DE without you.

  • expatuae

    of money. Might as well give money to Sestak to fight Pat Toomey, a real conservative with a real shot of winning.

    At least until O’Donnell came along, the race is close to even, with momentum for Democrats. Toomey has made no errors, running a flawless campaign. BTW, he would be the most conservative PA Senator in our lifetime.

    Why? DE is a small state. O’Donnell competes for media space in the same Philly market. Millions of dollars probably a lot of people on this board, most of whom mean well and want to support conservatives, but don’t understand the Philly/ DE market. There is now more news about O’Donnell recently (none favorable to the Republican candidates) in the Philly papers than there is news about the PA race.

    With those millions, she runs idiotic ads like the “I’m you”. Sure, we’re both human and share some views, but what does that mean? It has the benefit of being clearly untrue and meaningless simultaneously. Besides the emptyness of this sentimental ad, with the media attention to her baggage (fair or not), it turns a whole lot of people off to be accused of being Christine O’Donnell.

    So after millions to O’Donnell, we have acheived 1) still 0% chance of winning in DE and 2) energized the liberal Democratic base with some red meat social conservatism and 3) turned off the Independent/liberal Republican swing vote in the Philly suburbs. No Republican wins statewide in PA without winning the suburbs of Philadelphia.

    ?’donnell is a nice sincere person, but let’s be honest- Bill Maher didn’t hire her to be an effective conservative spokesperson. I’d vote for her against Coons, and that’s it.

    Face the facts, financial support at this point is counterproductive to the conservative cause.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      She probably will not win, but she did two things, both of them good. She ended the obnoxious career of turncoat rino Castle, and she has forced the Donks to spend money and time that they have little of, on a small state.

    • khayos

      She wouldn’t have gotten my $10 from Massachusetts

      • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

    • Aaron Gardner
      • expatuae

        Pete DuPont is a great DE Republican no doubt, and he is doing his part lest anyone think the “establishment” is not supporting O’Donnell.

        I don’t see anything in his article that contradicts my point that she is killing Toomey, other than his obligatory predictions of victory- as a party leader in DE, what else would he say?

        Maybe he is burnishing his moderate Republican pedigree with some conservative credentials for a run?

        The question is how much she is hurting Toomey, not whether she is hurting him. I think a lot, but hope not so much that we end up with Sestax for 6 years.

        • Aaron Gardner

          Reagan liked Kirk as well, he also knew that it’s a waste of time to bring up all the flaws of a Republican candidate just weeks before the election.

          If you are a follower of Kirk, as you have said, then act like a grown up. Instead of complaining about how you think O’Donnell has affected Toomey, get out and work for Toomey. Tearing down O’Donnell won’t help Toomey at all.

    • blooch

      Funny how I’m hearing that same thing everywhere.

      Michael Medved slammed her the other day, said she was embarrassing to Republicans, but he said the exact same thing as you.

      Remember, the voting booth is a private place, and modest folk in Delaware can do embarrassing things in there with impunity.

      Now I’ll embarrass myself with some haiku:

      The mask has not slipped,
      It has clattered on the floor.
      No shame anymore.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        Here is one on NPR

        They attack the tea party
        They like to assume the very worse
        but Muslims are off limits.

      • Aaron Gardner

        Blooch outed him quick

        Yes, we know he is a troll

        Soon we say “g’bye”.

        • blooch

          And I get the “expat” part, but what’s the “uae”? United Arab Emirates?

  • sta46
  • eldstenorge

    If we look back to the race between O’Donnell and Castle, we see that prior to the GOP attacking O’Donnell and saying they would not support her if she were nominated, she was also leading Coons in the polls. It is the GOP to blame for what we see right now. And, to send some idiot like Coons to the Senate shows how far America has fallen from its principles and roots. Coons, in the debate, mocked O’Donnell for supporting the Constitution with the question, I would like to ask you which Constitution you support? The Constitution of the Founders? The Constitution of (and he gave several different dates) or the Constitution of today. This shows that Coons is of the mentality that the Constitution only means what he is going to say it means. This is like when I was in law school and the professor told us “The Constitution is perfectly consistent with socialism The Constitution has no lasting principles. It only means what any people at any given time says it means.” I did not accept this in law school and I do not accept it now.

    • blooch

      The people of Delaware may decide it’s better to inflict him on the whole nation by kicking him upstairs and the he// out of Delaware, rather than let him continue to run amok locally.

  • tngal

    The Hill has a story up now about CO regrets making the ad. She says the point of the ad was to sor tof quell the whole witch thing but it didn’t. I didn’t get that was the point when I saw it. I like the ad. I thought the line “I am not a witch” was comical, then she comes over as a real person saying I am just like you.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/125163-odonnell-regrets-witch-ad

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      this morning…and I’m with you.

      I grinned ear to ear when I saw that ad.

      Sure, it was fodder for the ones pushing that meme to begin with, but to dolts like me I saw her mocking them with that ad…oh well, what do I know? Guess it’s a good thing I don’t work for her-I’d have really mucked that one up :)

  • texasgalt

    They got their polls and then we have ours.

    http://is.gd/gbPuR – h/t ===> @KLSouth