« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Peggy Noonan Heads Home

'stack consoles Peggy after she sups a Tea Party reality

'stack consoles Peggy after she sups a Tea Party reality

I have a love – hate relationship with Peggy Noonan…there-it’s out now.

During the early to middle Bush years we were like peas and carrots, Peggy and I. Mid to late years, and her anti-Iraq equivocation and left-lurches to the dark side? Not so much. Early Obama? Nope…not at all; she was chillin’ in Berkely, and I was driving around in circles on my red Snapper.

But now Peggy has boarded the Greyhound, and is heading back home. Together once again, in Greenbow, we shall be.

In her “Tea Party To The Rescue” piece, Peggy gives us two basic points to ponder. The first one suggests that Republicans, for reasons they still can’t see past themselves far enough to understand, have been selected – for now – by the Tea Party as the best alternative to a Political Party of its own. The second one makes clear that, despite Democrats’ unwillingness to admit as much, these 2010 midterm elections are NOT local, and have everything to do with Barack Obama himself:

It is not, broadly, about the strengths or weaknesses of various local candidates, about constituent services or seniority, although these elements will be at play in some outcomes, Barney Frank’s race likely being one. But it is significant that this year Mr. Frank is in the race of his life, and this week on TV he did not portray the finger-drumming smugness and impatience with your foolishness he usually displays on talk shows. He looked pale and mildly concussed, like someone who just found out that liberals die, too.

This election is about one man, Barack Obama, who fairly or not represents the following: the status quo, Washington, leftism, Nancy Pelosi, Fannie and Freddie, and deficits in trillions, not billions.

Everyone who votes is going to be pretty much voting yay or nay on all of that. And nothing can change that story line now.

Yes, Miss Peggy…a thousand times yes.

The one thing Noonan needs to give more thought to, as she comes back to the reservation, is her somewhat misguided notion that the Tea party is about George W. Bush. Where she rightly suggests that Bush went adrift in the sea of Conservative ideology…especially during his later years in office…she unfairly conflates that with the Tea Party message. While the Obama Administration and the 111th Congress might be an anti-Bush movement, the Tea Party clearly is not:

The tea party did something the Republican establishment was incapable of doing: It got the party out from under George W. Bush. The tea party rejected his administration’s spending, overreach and immigration proposals, among other items, and has become only too willing to say so. In doing this, the tea party allowed the Republican establishment itself to get out from under Mr. Bush: “We had to, boss, it was a political necessity!” They released the GOP establishment from its shame cringe.

Some of those over-reaches to which Noonan refers happened on Bush’s watch, to be sure, but they pale in comparison to those that have taken place in the time since he left town. This Tea Party business is not about “party”…it’s about what is right for the country despite whichever party happens to be in charge of it at any given time. And…it’s about taking BACK control of the place now that our Political Heroes have made such a mess of things…and making sure no one else gets elected that could ever do it again.

It’s ok though-I forgive her. She’s come a long way in a fairly short period of time. Enough R & R back in Greenbow with the rest of us pitchfork-totin’, bible-thumpin’, gun-clingin’ rubes and she’ll get her head right again.

[Crossposted]

COMMENTS

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    …we (a lot of us) were among the first to tell the Tea Parties the R brand, the original R Brand was worth rescuing. That goes back at least 7-8 months.

    Shall we gather at the river, to welcome Miss Peggy home?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htSXKYs8sQM

  • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

    .

  • susanwalkin
  • susanwalkin
  • chipbennett

    …but moreso, that assessment applies to the establishment Republican leadership – the same leadership that even today is fighting tooth-and-nail against Jim DeMint Republicans and TEA party candidates – that was complicit in the GOP’s leftward turn in the mid-2000s.

    The reason that the Democrat takeover of 2006 and 2008 took place was because elected Republicans abandoned conservatism in favor of Beltway establishment perks, go-along-get-along cronyism, and naive reach-across-the-aisle “bipartisanship” (which, in reality, means “Republicans make all the compromises”).

    The real test of the TEA party movement will be 2012, and the subsequent Congressional sessions: can the movement sustain its momentum into 2012, during which *real* change can be forced upon Washington (Republicans could easily see a 60-plus seat Senate majority) by replacing RINOs and democrats with more Jim DeMint Republicans.

    In the meantime: Mitch McConnell scares me. We need a conservative in leadership in the Senate if we hope to make any kind of lasting foothold.

  • student

    Conservatism is about “conserving” the values of classical liberalism America was founded on – liberty, small frugal and limited government, low taxation, free enterprise, empowerment of the individual rather than the state to make the important choices in ones own lives and reap the benefits and prices of such choices. Ultimately these are the values that underly the Republican party. The Tea Party arose because the leaders of the Republican party sold out to the idea that they could prosper by being mini-Democrats, buying votes with earmarks, raising money by raping the Republic for the benefit of lobbyists. Bush aggravated the situation by his “compassionate conservatism” providing a rationale for forsaking the values of classical liberalism and adopting the values of the mini-Democrats. The Tea Party members understand at a gut level what Conservatism is and why they are opposed to the values of the Democrats – large, expensive and unlimited government, high taxation, government owned or controlled enterprise, empowerment of the state to make all the important choices in your life whether it is the curriculum and values your children are exposed to in school or when they pull the plug on you at the end. This election is an imperfect but significant start to the process of purging the Republican party of the RINO/mini-Democrats and re-building it around the values of classical liberalism.

  • darcdante

    Here’s another article of her’s on the message:

    http://www.peggynoonan.com/article.php?article=540

    “For conservatives on the ground, it has often felt as if Democrats (and moderate Republicans) were always saying, “We should spend a trillion dollars,” and the Republican Party would respond, “No, too costly. How about $700 billion?” Conservatives on the ground are thinking, “How about nothing? How about we don’t spend more money but finally start cutting.”

    No one else has said it better. Every Tea Partier should read that article.

  • texasgalt

    never mend.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      I am not in a forgiving mood. Maybe after we have purged all the wishy washy’s we can forgive.

      • texasgalt

        but a knife in the back . . . this I do not forgive. Ever.

  • itrytobenice

    She’s still a David Brooks wannabe.

    She loved BO when he was cool; now he’s not and she’s out of love. She may have hung around Ronald Magnamus, but it obviously didn’t take.

    However, in this she is right: The tea party is not about party. It’s about rebellion against the ruling class. Just like the first time.

    • 6eorge Jetson

      but when things were tough, she bailed. She’s a bandwagon Conservative at best.

  • streiff

    and more her acknowledging that the people she’s aided and abetted these past two years are on the way out and if she wants to still be a columnist she’s going to need people to talk to her.

    Give her 6 months and she’ll be disillusioned by the ill bred hicks in the Tea Party. Think David Brooks in a skirt.

    • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

      ..

      • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth
    • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth

      Right now the tide is moving against the Democrats and towards those depised Tea Party conservatives whom she and her elite buddies couldn’t abide just a few months ago.

      Suddenly she deciding she needs to hedge her bets just in case the peasants do take charge.

      Summer soldiers we don’t need – so far she’s left us in the lurch when the going gets tough.

      So let’s not be so quick to take her back – but at least we can be happy she’s not trying to cut holes in the hull for now – unlike Meghan.

    • Read Chesterton

      Other than that her opinion to me holds less weight than even the most casual RS poster. She turned for Obama. She’s got nothing to say that I need to hear.

  • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison

    I think that she got caught up in what Laura Ingraham calls the razzle-dazzle of the Obama candidacy (Side note: Ingraham’s The Obama Diaries is a great read). I can’t fault her too much; I did too (long story).

    He has not governed as advertised, and I think that his very partisan presidency, coupled perhaps with admiration for the Tea Party (where she sees her old Reagan ideals alive and well) served, perhaps, as a wake-up call. Or maybe I’m simply projecting my experience onto her, as we often do with celebrities.

    The following passage strikes me as oddly confessional: “That establishment, composed largely of 50- to 75-year-olds who came to Washington during the Reagan era in a great rush of idealism, in many cases stayed on, as they say, not to do good but to do well.”

    At any rate, she’s a great writer, and I’ve enjoyed her last few columns quite a lot. Hopefully her return to the GOP is, like mine, sincere. I think that it probably is.

  • Superheater

    I just can’t trust the missives of someone who once described Obama as “elegant”-and meant it.

    I

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    As reported back when McCain announced Sarah Palin would be his running mate) back and forth between Mike Murphy (“MM”) and Peggy Noonan (“PN”) during a time when they thought they were off mic:

    Mike Murphy: You know, because I come out of the blue swing state governor world: Engler, Whitman, Tommy Thompson, Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush. I mean, these guys — this is how you win a Texas race, just run it up. And it’s not gonna work. And –

    PN: It’s over.

    MM: Still McCain can give a version of the Lieberman speech to do himself some good.

    CT: I also think the Palin pick is insulting to Kay Bailey Hutchinson, too.

    PN: Saw Kay this morning.

    CT: Yeah, she’s never looked comfortable about this –

    MM: They’re all bummed out.

    CT: Yeah, I mean is she really the most qualified woman they could have turned to?

    PN: The most qualified? No! I think they went for this — excuse me– political bullshit about narratives –

    CT: Yeah they went to a narrative.

    MM: I totally agree.

    PN: Every time the Republicans do that, because that’s not where they live and it’s not what they’re good at, they blow it.

    Reported at the Huffington Post here. Here is the video:

    While looking for the above, I came across this little gem, which pretty sums up Noonan’s history with Sarah Palin and the new conservatives who are coming into the Republican Party via the tea parties, etc.

    Thank you.

    ColdWarrior

    • Deskpilot

      for Green Peggy!. Fits her to a TEE. THe kind that you want to put a little white ball on and just whack the $#it out of, especially if you don’t care if it hooks LEFT.

  • bobmontgomery

    …the whole tenor of it was condescending. It was all about the Republican party, as in “You’ve really got to hand it to those Tea people for returning The Party to power”, and “we Really appreciate you Tea people helping us regain committee chairmanships and we really won’t forget you on our way back up”. and “Isn’t it great we found out we are third cousins! Who knew? Really feels good to go back’down home’ for a spell and refresh the soul, until its time to get back to the real world of passing laws. lots and lots and lots of laws.”

  • jeffreyinsa

    From the comments I scrolled by I can see a lot of agreement regarding your Love Hate relationship with Peggy.

    Unlike with Juan Williams & the left though. We realized people can wander off the reservation & then return. Hopefully, this painful romance she had with Obama & getting slapped for her comments about Sarah Palin have taught her a few things.

    I haven’t seen it verified but my gut feeling is a large number of TEA partiers are people who felt they had no one to vote for in the ’08 election and so stayed home. Now they are so mad they realize they can’t afford to stay home. However, woe to anyone elected with TEA party support who then doesn’t live up to expectation. Their political career will be short.

  • cactusjack

    her back with a genial smile and tell a story that made the point “don’t do this again.” But that’s not the end of the story. RWR’s on-board radar, Nancy, would tell him that night after COB, “this dame is bad news for you Ronnie, you had better deal with her now. ” Next morning, Peggy would unexpectedly find herself in the WH basement with an unoiled Underwood typewriter, and no assignments.

  • Right Reason

    Peggy is simply realizing that the DC coktail party circuit wil become the DC Tea Party circuit and she wants to try and make sure she’s with the “in” crowd. For the amount of words she’s spent trashing the Tea Party and conservatives in general, one column doesn’t come close to evening the score.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      forever, These beltway Republicans still don’t know what a Tsunami is about to wash over their sorry asses.

  • mikerazar

    her logic is beyond repair; her values are weak; her loyalty is non-existent; her voice is annoying; she has not had an original idea since the eighties; she is boring. Of course she should be given a leadership role in the “new” GOP.

  • AceInTX

    Some of those over-reaches to which Noonan refers happened on Bush?s watch, to be sure, but they pale in comparison to those that have taken place in the time since he left town. This Tea Party business is not about ?party??it?s about what is right for the country despite whichever party happens to be in charge of it at any given time. And?it?s about taking BACK control of the place now that our Political Heroes have made such a mess of things?and making sure no one else gets elected that could ever do it again.

    I can understand where you are coming from…but she has a point about the Bush lurch to the left after 2004….

    The TEA party has put Republicans back in the ascendancy and will keep us there as long as we don’t lose site of the issues we all agree on….limited government, less taxes, less spending and the ability to live and raise our families according to our traditions and values free from interference from the long arm of government.

    she has a point VSV the Bush years in this…if our leadership comes in and reverts to the same foolishness that defined the 2005 to 2008 GOP….Myers, Amnesty, 300 Billion Dollar Farm Bills, and on and on….they’ll be out on their ears again in 12.

  • tea4me

    But it’s not just this article, nor that other one posted in here. Her last 5 or 6 have been fantastic reads. When she is on the right message. She is one of the most gifted wordsmiths there is.

    • JSobieski

      Noonan is her own category.

  • brandoncraig

    It will be a long time before I have any interest in reading what Peggy Noonan, David Brooks, Kathleen Parker or any other “conservative” writer who supported electing Obama has to say about any issue.

    Greg, Obama has governed exactly how anyone who was paying attention in 2008 would have expected. I don’t know your story as to why you fell for this sham, but anyone who thought that someone with no life experience and who was a member of a racist church for 20 years should be elected president of the United States was either uninformed, a fool or extremely naive.

    Until Peggy Noonan and the others who helped elect Obama write their mea culpa column, they should not be welcomed back to the conservative movement. After 2 years, I still can’t believe that so many “conservatives” and “libertarians” were foolish enough to think that Obama was a legitimate option.

  • Pingback: What Transforming Your Kitchen Can Do For Your Residence

  • Pingback: Main Issues About Basement Renovations

  • Pingback: Why You Should Deal With Water Damage Fast