« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Jeff Sessions to Head of Immigration – Do Your Job

Well – at least they admit it. According to the Chicago Tribune, the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), John Morton, said “his agency will not necessarily process illegal immigrants referred to them [sic] by Arizona officials.”

Yes. Let me give you a moment to re-read that paragraph. The guy in charge of immigration enforcement for the United States of America is saying he will refuse to enforce immigration laws. Sounds like someone doesn’t understand the requirements of his job.

Kudos to Senator Jeff Sessions for calling him out on Fox news earlier today. According to Fox, when reached for comment, DHS responded by acknowledging that what Morton said was true and then added that “[t]he President ordered DOJ to examine the civil rights and other implications of this law. That review will inform the government’s actions going forward.”

Senator Sessions rightly pointed out that the administration looks like it is “nullifying existing law.” And further, that if “[Morton] can’t enforce the law, he shouldn’t have the job. That is the top immigration enforcement position in America, he is required in my view to seek the help he can to enforce the law, and to reject the help of the law officers in Arizona – and all over America for that matter – makes him in my view not fulfilling the responsibilities of his office.”

Right.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • NeoKong

    Screw the law.

    • gemimail

      Would being hung out to dry be too strong to describe the situation they are faced with? Please read this article outlining how they are running out of options: http://www.marstonchronicles.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=489&Itemid=1335.

  • cabanon

    through removal proceedings in Immigration Court ICE determines which cases it proceeds with. If there are might be serious Constitutional challenges to SB 1070 then ICE has the discretion to hold of til it is clarified. If they put a bunch of people into the system only to have them all get released on a technicality related to SB 1070 then they’ve just wasted lots of money processing these people.

    • http://www.libertytreehugger.com reverelth

      And the Feds do not?

      • cabanon

        I just posted to someone else that the point is that regulation of immigration is unquestionably an exclusive federal power. Arizona can arrest as many people as it wants but it can

        • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

          Is AZ obligated to release persons ILLEGALLY in the country and in AZ if the Fed refuses to act?

          • SteveLA

            DerKreiger

            How much is holding them indefinitely going to cost the citizens of AZ? Even at Sheriff Joe’s low cost desert jail rates, it’s not an insignificant amount of money.

            Throw in the question of does AZ have the legal authority to detain someone on Federal Charges once the state charges are dealt with and time served.

            You have to shame the Feds into doing their job in controlling illegal immigration, and AZ 1070 is just the first step.

          • mbecker908

            about $1 per inmate per day. The sheriff was on the airwaves today saying “send ‘em in”.

          • SteveLA

            mbecker

            I don’t doubt the Sheriff Joe can do the job cheap, but I’d guess that with staff and all it’s somewhat more, not a lot more but some. Still gonna cost something, and it’s a cost that the folks in AZ should hot have to pay, should be the Feds.

          • mbecker908

            two meals. They don’t heat or air condition the tents so utility cost is basically zero and the inmate to officer ratio is about 100 to 1.

          • mbecker908

            and found nothing that I’d either swear to or swear at.

            The one thing I’m pretty sure of is that Tent City is least cost detention facility in the nation on a per inmate basis.

          • The_Rebel

            it’s a lot less than the cost of the social upheaval, murders, kidnappings, and other unrest that these illegals have brought to the citizens of AZ. Seems to me that there will be a tremendous cost savings for each illegal put in a holding pen.

          • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

            …the Feds will let AZ hold them indefinitely? No. What would happen is that the Federal government would have to very publicly either force AZ to let them go or deport them. Either is a loser for Obama and the Feds. They would be exposed, again, for the liars they are regarding stopping illegal immigration.

          • Next93

            Lets see how long Angelino taxpayers appreciate thier city council’s (empty) gesture of solidarity with the downtrodden illegals of Arizona when said downtrodden start flooding into LA

    • SteveLA

      cabanon

      There is not going to be an issue with an illegal caught by Arizona facing Federal charges, they are not being prosecuted by AZ, illegal aliens are being turned over for the crime of entry into this country without legal status which is covered by a federal statute.

      Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, “Improper Entry by Alien,” any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

      * Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or
      * Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or
      * Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact;

      has committed a federal crime. However this crime not a felony.

      ICE may refuse to prosecute due to lack of resources, at least for those who have not been caught before.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      You really think this is about money?

      Are you seriously arguing this in good faith or just trolling?

      • Scope

        this person has never come down on the side of “posting in good faith.” I tried to point that out many diaries ago. This person is not on our side. I have asked this person is they are a Republican, and they never answer that question. I would think that this person’s post about the AZ law, and the fact that they are arguing that it is “strictly a federal jurisdiction” should surely show the faith of the poster. Maybe you, or other posters can finally draw this person out. Please look at their history of posts.

        • cabanon

          I’m a Conservative first and a Republican second. I’ve never stated I was against the AZ law only that it has the shortcomings of not being able to force federal agencies to do anything.

          And yes the regulation of immigration is unquestionably an exclusive federal power, can a state issue its own visas to foreigners to enter the U.S.? No. Can a state issue green cards? No. And a state can not deport someone. Can state and local law enforcement enforce federal law? Yes. You don’t seem to grasp the difference.

          If you’d like to have a discussion of the law, we can certainly do that if not then don’t bother.

      • cabanon

        But money and resources are definitely an issue when it comes to illegals. I mean do you think CBP is adequately funded?

        A third of the prison population are illegals, thats like 500,000 people that the federal government could work on deporting anytime it likes. There is no political reason, even for the Democrats, to keep illegal criminals in the country its basic, lack of resources.

        But I also suspect that ICE and the administration don’t think attrition through enforcement is a realistic policy. It requires making life here in the U.S. more miserable than in Mexico for illegals and that just ain’t gonna happen cause Mexico completely and totally sucks.

        • hickorystick

          If they don’t like conditions in their home country, they need to change their own country, not run over here. They have no right to be here.
          As far as Arizona, they have a right to make their own laws. If they choose to spend money detaining invading foreigners, that’s their business. The national government has abandoned it’s right to enforce immigration, because it only selectively enforces here and there.

          • Achance

            were democratic. If you’re a brown-eyed Mexican, you’re going to “vote right” or you’re not going to vote at all.

          • hickorystick

            You got to hand it to Reverend MLK Jr. and company, they had guts.

          • acat

            ..and most of the young, idle, male population of Mexico has been heading North to pick lettuce or build houses or bus tables or make pizza because that’s their path to improvement. With, of course, money sent home.

            We’ve been the pressure-release valve for Mexico’s unrest. And that’s okay – a bloody civil war, tens of thousands of refugees flooding across the border.. in human terms, that’s better than a war.

            What it does, though, is to reduce the drive for change – the corruptocrats become emboldened, the situation gets worse, and for some, other paths to improvement – piracy, gang warfare, narcotrafficing, human trafficing – and it’s all coming across a swiss-cheese border.

            Seems to me, the solution is to seal the border and, after that, maybe see if there’s a need for some sort of a well-documented guest worker program.

            Mew

          • Richard Mullins

            but the laws and Constitution were written to give the Federal Government somewhat of an unlimited control. Put that with a 1 6yr Term for a President and you have the makings of nothing will be done. The Mexican government(that not the puppet President) never keeps its end of the bargain. Simply put, if you not in the elite class that is the Federal government, you might as well go.

          • hickorystick

            The form of government isn’t the problem. They do have a vote. If they can form a gang, then they can form a grassroots resistance. They have a impressive GDP, there’s plenty of money in the country. They need to be more demanding in their own country.

        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          ARE you a Republican?

          • cabanon

            as I said before though I’d consider myself a Conservative first

        • clarencedebarrows

          During the “Great Depression” Herbert Hoover deported ALL illegal aliens!
          Harry Truman deported over two million illegal aliens so vets could work!
          Dwight Eisenhower deported 13 million Mexican Nationals so vets could work – it took two years, but he did it!

          And it’s your position that we don’t actively address the problem now because of a “basic lack of resources.”

          Cabanon: Your penchant to “have a discussion of the law”, while sounding noble, does nothing to resolve the issue at hand. It in fact exacerbates the problem with relevant sounding rhetoric that obfuscates rather than clarifies. It does sound as if you have some grounding in logic and the law, but little understanding of past actions that have effectively addressed the illegal immigration issue quite adequately. It’s not resources that are deficient it’s the agenda!

  • SteveLA

    So let’s say Obama and ICE does not want to accept illegal aliens arrested by authorities in Arizona, what should happen next?

    I’m all for packing any illegal aliens arrested in Arizona into buses and driving them down to the local Phoenix Federal court house handing them over to Federal authorities. Live and on TV as an act of disobedience of the Obama administration. Or bus them down to the gates of the nearest Federal installation and turn them over to the commander, or back to the border, or any number of symbolic hand overs to Federal authorities.

    All on camera and in public view as an act of disobedience to the rule of King Obama .

    • merryj1

      I’ll drive the bus if I can take them to LA or San Fran, where they can enjoy “sanctuary” on the enablers’ dime.

      • SteveLA

        Live and on TV, officials from Arizona trying to turn over illegal aliens to the Federal Government officers in AZ so they can do their job….nice optics.

        Heck, round up illegals for a month, pick those out who have already been deported at least once, see how Obama and his Mob buddies spin the fact that they don’t want to deal with even those already legally deported, can’t all be his Aunt.

      • popdaddy

        Border states like AZ & TEXAS, where the Federal government is not going to act on their responsibilit. Then state law enforcement can load all the illegal aliens arrested on an buses and ship the SOB’s right down to the bridge/crossing.

        A show of shotguns can point these illegal

        • acat

          The point isn’t to get the illegals out of the state.

          The point is to shame the Obama administration into upholding the laws of this country.

          Mew

          • lineholder

            who has no shame?

            If the goal is one of lawlessness, they are laying down a pretty strong foundation for it.

          • acat

            or they can respond to the election issue they’re creating.

            The thing to remember about Dems is they’re just as much a coalition party as Repubs, and some members of the coalition – union rank and file for example – are natural allies of a closed-border guest-worker strategery.

            Mew

          • davesinsanantonio

            union members to understand economic reality and encourage them to kick out their leadership who do not really care about the members, and to replace them with those who do. Some union leaders are good people. Some union leaders are only feathering their own nests at the expense of the rank and file. That feathering can be economic or political. This is another area in which we need to trumpet truth, facts, and logic. Not all union members are blind Dems following doctrinaire leaders. We will need their votes in November and beyond. Let us help them understand.

          • http://www.periodictablet.com superamerican

            except by the Democrats to get elected. That is their only need in the United States, so eliminate them.

            http://www.periodictablet.com

            Superamerican

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    When Obama succeeds in starting a war between the states, you’ll be posting here that it’s all really a glorified waterballoon fight.

    • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth
      • cabanon

        But the point is that regulation of immigration is unquestionably an exclusive federal power. Arizona can arrest as many people as it wants but it can’t force the federal government to do a damn thing.

        • http://www.libertytreehugger.com reverelth

          If the Feds declined to prosecute any other crime, say, voter intimidation by the New Black Panthers, does that mean state and local law enforcement should let those perps go free, too?

          • cabanon

            But in the issue of illegals the state can’t deport them, thats the federal government’s domain. So they can arrest them and then if found guilty hold them for the 6 months they’d get for the misdemeanor but then have to release them. I’m not sure AZ could hold them indefinitely. States can enforce the law but immigration is up to the feds.

          • davesinsanantonio

            is needed. The feds will have two choices, accept the illegals with a very public record of doing so, or refuse to take them with a very public record of doing so. Either way, then they have to do their job or live with the results of everyone knowing they reifuse to do their job (as in when they accept the illegals and then just let them go.) Either way, the voters will know what the current regime is doing and then they will vote as they see fit. It is the truth that will set us free. We have to find ways to get the former mainstream media to show the story. There are lots of smart people out there, let us put them to work. A story is a story. Let us find ways to get the FMSM to air this one.

  • merryj1

    That’s a long-time perk for a lot of Chicago-area patronage workers (some great gravy jobs, too — something like 305 Boards created in the last 7 years, with some board members raking in 6-figure salaries for a “job” that requires attending a meeting once a month. Nice work if you can get it).

    I know that the ICE boss’s job isn’t really a ‘no-show,’ but it might as well be if he picks and chooses what part of his job description he’s agreeable to doing. Same thing with the SEC bunch — spend their working hours watching porn, and no one loses the job? That’s when you clean house, from senior management down to the mail room.

    There’s a “You Cut” (gov’t spending) program, headed by Eric Cantor & several Republicans — someone please correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the site is www.republicanwhip.youcut.house.gov – every week they’re posting five federal spending programs, and (we) vote on the one we’d most like to have cut out of the budget; Cantor & crew introduce it as a bill the following week.

    There’s also an option to write in the spending cut you’d most favor — I think we should all go write in a vote to defund or cut by half all derelict agencies, such as ICE & SEC, and while they’re at it, all budget amounts for the approximately 40 “Czars” & their office quarters & staffs, that Obama circumvented the Constitutional “Advise & Consent” role of the Senate by appoiinting.

    Last week, there were nearly 300,000 citizen votes for the five issues posted; I think if enough entries for defunding derelict agencies, etc., came in, it could be a pretty strong statement of our general disgust with these unelected, unaccountable renegade appointees. But that’s just me.

  • jcincy

    If executive branch officials will not fulfill the sworn obligations and if the Chief Executive refuses to remove them from office, I believe, it is the responsibility of the legislative branch to impeach.

    Of course, Pelosi and company will ignore their Constitutional Duty.

    This is sad commentary on the state of the USA.

  • hickorystick

    So let me get this straight. If the Border Agent hadn’t caught the Millenium Bomber at the Port Angeles crossing, ICE agents would have been under order not to look for him.

  • From ME to You

    Secretary Janet Napolitano
    Department of Homeland Security
    500 12th St, SW
    Washington, DC 20536

    Assistant Secretary John Morton
    Immigration and Customs Enforcement
    500 12th St, SW
    Washington, DC 20536

    One to him saying: “Do our job!” and one to her saying “If he doesn’t do his job do yours and fire him!”

    • acat

      mew

      • From ME to You

        I can see November from my house!

  • RINKER

    Yep. That’s my Senator… ;)

    What infuriated me about the entire episode was the ICE statement that they are after more dangerous people. Please! The entire point of the Arizona law is that they question citizenship if they already have a reason to stop the person. So if they have commited a crime and the AZ police find out they aren’t a citizen, the Feds are going to do nothing???

    • acat

      ICE are following something along the lines of certain metro police departments – ignore the minor crime, go after the hardcore.

      There are a number of problems with this model. By allowing pockets of illegals, we create a number of havens for the truly dangerous to shelter in, including a population who are all afraid of ICE and won’t turn anyone in. Remove the pockets, make the dangerous easier to find, and having a wide-open border makes it easier for the more dangerous to slip back and forth.

      If a cat can figure this out, maybe the wrong person is running the ICE. Oh wait.. that’s already true.

      Mew

    • Next93

      To quote the jewish passover ceremony: “Why is this night different from all others?”

      If the feds were doing something, Arizona wouldn’t have had to pass this law,

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    In my opinion this is just one more thing to impeach the O for. If the dems really were serious about staying in charge they’d start impeachment hearing proceedings etc in September or so and tell the O “we’re just doing it to win the elections”… then follow through afterwards with throwing the O out of office…

  • kaptkane

    “potential legal challenges” etc. etc.
    IMHO that’s a big part of the “problem”!
    The lawyers have to go.
    I personally, do not vote for anyone who is an attorney. Period.
    535…they all gotta go!!!

  • bay0wulf

    They won’t process the Illegals sent to them? No problem … load the Illegals onto buses and send them to either the nearest “Sanctuary City/State” OR just send them directly to Washington DC.

    Sooner or later they will get the drift when thousands of Illegals are choking their streets and hospitls.

  • http://www.periodictablet.com superamerican

    The Obama Administration and it’s chief “law enforcement” officer Eric Holder do not seem to believe in the Rule of Law, the underpinniing of the success of the United States of America. The law is whatever they want it to be. This is the most frightening part of the rule of Barack Obama.

    http://www.periodictablet.com

    Superamerican

  • vastlyright

    Our federal government is rife with corrupt power hungry elitists hopefully not quite as bad as Mexico, .What we are witnessing now is the selling out of the states by the federal government.
    As an example [ however absurd ] let’s suppose Canada decides to invade and annex Maine.The federal government fails it’s duty to defend the state.Whether because of fecklessness or because the ruling party sees some advantage in the invasion to the entrenchment of their own power.Should Maine listen to the feds who command them not to defend themselves,because it’s the federal government’s job to do so? I think NOT!
    What we are witnessing is a slow motion invasion and usurpation of our national sovereignty,the border states are the first and hardest hit and raising the alarm yet the feds do less than nothing to defend those states.

  • Pingback: GOOGLE'S ANNOUNCEMENT !

  • Pingback: kizi