« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The “Rule of Law” Requires Good Rules – Even (or Especially) in Golf

For the golfers among us, yesterday’s final round of the PGA Championships at the demanding and beautiful Whistling Straits Golf Courts in Kohler, Wisconsin, brought not just the normal excitement but quite a bit of controversy as well.

Dustin Johnson came to the 18th hole sitting on a one shot lead at 12 under par, with two guys in the clubhouse at 11 under, Bubba Watson and eventual champion Martin Kaymer. Dustin blocked his drive to the right, landing deep in to the tens of thousands of spectators making up the gallery. His ball came to rest in a little flat spot covered in sand deep in the middle of those spectators who followed the custom of opening up a path for Dustin to get to his ball and take his shot. He made it back there, assessed his lie, picked a 5 iron for the approximately 230-yard shot and set up to the ball and hit his shot left of the green. He ultimately missed an 8 foot putt for par and was headed for a playoff. Or so he thought.

A rules official notified him of a problem.

Here’s what happened. A bunker, normally filled with sand, is what is known as a “hazard” and under the rules of Golf, a player is not permitted to “ground” his club (that is, to touch the ground before he strikes the ball). Now, Whistling Straits is a Pete Dye-designed course, and is heavily bunkered – in fact, it has over a thousand of them. Dustin’s ball had ended up in one of these bunkers. And Dustin grounded his club before he struck the ball. Dustin was assessed a 2 shot penalty, forcing him out of the playoff and to the locker room.

The first thing that should be noted is that Dustin Johnson handled the situation like a total gentleman and with class and respect for the game, the officials and his fellow competitors. Kudos to him. But the reason I am writing is that most of the commentary about the unfortunate event has centered on the fact Johnson should have read the rules sheet (either more intently, or at all) so that he would have known that the local rule (because of the 1000+ bunkers) is that ALL bunkers on the course are to be played as a true bunker. In other words, despite feeling bad for him, “it was Dustin’s fault.”

Yes, it technically was his fault and the PGA made the right ruling. It was a bunker, he grounded his club and it was a violation. BUT, that is not the important lesson for me.

The rule of law – in sports or in real life – requires having good rules. At Whistling Straits, the local rules allow spectators to walk through certain of the hundreds of bunkers. I think this is a bad idea in the first place, but ok – fine, maybe it’s needed to get spectators around. But it is a terrible rule to say that a bunker that has been trampled, and is filled with spectators, must be played like a normal bunker. A bunker filled with spectators is not likely to be identified as such by a player.

In short this is a terrible rule – and in the last event held at this course, another one of the game’s best golfers was bitten by a similar situation (Stuart Appleby was penalized 4 shots). Every competitive golfer I know could have fallen prey to this situation. He walked up, was on flat ground with some sand on it and saw nothing resembling the outlines of a normal bunker because 90 percent of the bunker was filled with spectators.

The PGA Championship returns to Whistling Straits in 2015 and the Ryder Cup will be held there in 2020. Before those tournaments are held, the PGA must find a rule that works, because the last two events held there have undermined the very important and very respectable Rules of Golf by requiring them to be applied in ridiculous ways.

The rule I would propose is this: if spectators are allowed to walk in any particular bunker, that bunker is not treated as a hazard. It is treated as what is known as a “waste bunker,” and then the player is allowed to ground his club. That way, confusion such as that which marred the final round of the final major of the year can be avoided in the future.

And in that way, the Rules of Golf can continue to be upheld and respected as reasonable, fair and important to the core of the game. Rules have to be respectable to be respected. Johnson conducted himself like a gentleman – let’s hope that the PGA Rules Committee honors his commitment to the game by changing the rule to a respectable one.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • bk

    A couple of other occasions come to mind…

    - I recall once when a guy was hitting a ball on a wet course – I think he was under a tree where he had to hit a shot from his knees or something like that. He got penalized for building a “platform”, which in this case consisted of laying his rain jacket on the ground to kneel on.

    - I recall another one where Tiger Woods’ ball ended up behind a large boulder. He got a ruling that the boulder was considered a “loose impediment” and a bunch of spectators managed to move it out of his way.

    In this case no one mentioned whether the “book” the players get showed all these “bunkers”. The rules guy said that some of them were no bigger than maybe 2-3 feet across. What?? On the other hand, it could have been worse for Johnson. Had they let him sign the scorecard and then pointed it out, I believe he would have been DQed and lost the $270K he ended up earning.

    • ffc99

      what happened to Brian Davis at Hilton Head a few months ago. I love the game, but I think there a lot of rules which the USGA and R&A would be well advised to reconsider or excise completely from the Rules of Golf.

  • romeg

    What is meant by “Grounding the club” as it applies to this event?

    • bk
      • eastbaylarry

        What is the purpose of this rule? (I’m not a golfer so please forgive my ignorance).

        • satchman3

          I think the idea is that by touching the ground behind the ball (in a bunker) the player is testing the condition of the ground. That’s not allowed in a bunker or in a hazard but it is allowed elsewhere.

          You are allowed to wiggle your feet into the sand in such a way that you are unlikely to slip. Experienced players know how to use the rules to their advantage. They also know not to ground their putter behind the ball in windy conditions because if the wind moves the ball after you ground your club you get a penalty.

          I sure wish his caddy had said something. Ultimately it’s the player’s responsibility but a good caddy is supposed to keep his head in the game and catch stuff like this too.

  • Deskpilot

    came out to the CBS camera and carefully explained the situation as it relates to rule. I stated that there was AMPLE WRITTEN notification to all players throughout the club of the play of bunkers.
    We fans don’t have to like it, but when something like that is clearly published….

    Kind of like approaching a small town and the speed limit drops in 10moh increments every 62′. BLAM- RADAR – Penalty – Revenue.

    • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

      But it’s still unfair, unethical, and makes ordinary people hold the law in contempt. If the law gets a reputation as being a ass (to cite Dickens), bad things happen to society or any other rules-based organization.

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    He knew there are like 1000 bunkers on the course (including some odd ones). Even if he didn’t read the rules sheet, when he saw the ball laying in sand he could have simply asked the rules official with his group if he was “in a bunker”. When a major championship is on the line (on the 18th hole no less), one should take every possible precaution.

    • bk

      but after 75 holes I guess his mind was elsewhere. None of the TV “experts” noticed it either – they found out when the rest of us did.

  • RedBeard

    “Golf is a good walk spoiled.” –Mark Twain

    • http://www.colinwitt.com/ cmw
      • RedBeard

        I quit the game some years ago. I finally saw that I could reach the same degree of satisfaction by poking myself repeatedly in the eye with a pointed stick, then lighting a hundred dollar bill on fire. And it would only take a few minutes, instead of wasting an entire morning on the links. ;-)

        Although, while I was still playing Cow Pasture Pool, I did have one great advantage over most other golfers. For the same fees, I got to hit the ball twice as many times as they did.

  • jomo2009

    one of Obama’s healthcare czars designed the rules for this course. With regard to healthcare, if similar rules obtain, it lends new meaning to the term “two stroke penalty.”

  • gekster

    One way to shoot out of a bunker is to basically get “under” the ball, to dig into the sand before hitting the ball, to give your ball lift out of the bunker.
    If you “ground” your club, you can pack the sand to where there is a small clearing behind the ball, giving an advantage to your shot, because you are not hitting as much sand before hitting the ball.

    My friend Mike explained it to me this way, and he is a golfing nut.
    Me, I don’t have a clue.
    To me, if it had been trampled on, it should be treated like a cart path.
    I hope this is not reactionary.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The rule of law matters, but laws bad enough to bring the law to ridicule undermine the rule of law as much as selective enforcement does.

    • Finrod

      .

      • Achance

        If you drive 70, even in the far right lane, in most places you’ll have tire marks right over the top of your car. There are only a few short stretches here in Juneau where you can even sustain 55, the limit on roads with at-grade intersections here, so it is always a shock to my system when I go ouside, get my rental car, and hit the freeway with 80-85 mph bumper to bumper traffic.

        • Finrod

          Of course, no one goes 55 there unless they’re a tourist, who just end up becoming road hazards. I’ve seen the 190-year-old grandmas driving up the Connector in a land yacht with Florida plates doing 45mph where all you can see is a pair of eyes peeping over the wheel between two skeleton hands, with traffic backing up behind them like there was a stalled car there.

  • http://www.ArchitecturalShots.com mdyou

    I certainly agree with Hogan – the rule was bad, but is was a LOCAL RULE that entrapped (hehe) Dustin Johnson, not one of the Rules of Golf. The club grounding was the penalty, but it occurred because of the local rule regarding what should have been treated as a waste bunker.

    The stupidest rule in golf, which still bites the pros these days, is the prohibition of fixing spike marks on the green. And the Brian Davis situation at Hilton Head was equally tragic and that rule is unnecessarily penal as well.

    • ffc99

      You’re allowed to fix ball marks on greens, but not spike marks. Explain the logic in that…

    • qsclues

      is (at least to me) the continued existence of the scorecard. In this day and age, it serves no practical purpose, and only seems to be there as a “gotcha” to get someone DQ’ed. I don’t like the idea of someone winning the event on the field of play, only to lose for completely unrelated reasons.

      Then again, those of us who have to put up with being represented by “Acting Senator” Al Fraudken know what that’s like.

  • rdelbov

    the idea is that its a bunker even if its not a bunker. Yes it was posted on the rules sheet but it was certainly not posted that bunkers would also be used as fan’s viewing stations. To me its clear that it was not a bunker because there were fans footprints all over creating an uneven playing area. Proper bunkers are raked with a rake being beside it for play.

    I don’t recall the incident from 2004 but I do not believe the player was in a bunker with fans. It was a flat piece of land with sand/dirt that a player not only grounded his club in but removed some items from the area by hand.

    A Marshall or rules official should have been there to remove all the fans from the so called bunker and to clearly show the player that he needed to be aware of his situation.

    I think the PGA messed up big time. This area was very similar to dirt around a cart path or dirt around a TV tower or stands.

    What a mess

    • ffc99

      the local rule sheet mentioned specifically that some bunkers outside the ropes would include footprints, tire tracks, etc. and would not be raked.

      • rdelbov

        that’s what the local rule said but in PGA events 100% of the time the player has the bunker to himself. The Marshall/Rules official should have removed all the people from the area so the player could acutally determine what sort of area he was in. There is a huge difference between saying “footprints will be in bunker” and you will see 800 people surrounding your ball on beaten down dirt and grass.

        Its fine to say that-on a rules sheet-that a player might find a footprint in a bunker but 200 people is a whole other matter and that was not covered by local rules.

    • The_Rebel

      Johnson that this was, indeed, a bunker. The official claimed that there were too many people in the area and he couldn’t get through. Please! These high and mighty officials take all the fun out of the game. It was incumbent upon the PGA, knowing that this course had over a thousand bunkers, many of which were questionable, to have properly informed Johnson whether this was a valid bunker or not.

      Some might say that there aren’t enough officials to cover all the players at all times. But with everything at stake at the end and with television cameras trained on this shot, one wonders how many other players during the course of the four days grounded their clubs on suspicious bunkers. They were fortunate to have had a lack of tv exposure on their shots.

  • bk

    I half expected them to rule that it counted as a stroke. I have no idea what the rule is on that. He stopped right around the time he had completed his backswing – I’m not sure whether he had started his forward swing or not or whether that even matters.

  • mexdawg1

    Waste bunkers outside the ropes would have been appropriate in this situation. Two things. If you look at the video, I believe there was quite a bit of grass very close to his ball, thus making this area worn from foot traffic and not a bunker. Worse, I believe he grounded his club more than once. Not sure how the rule reads on this issue. Bubba’s wife met him outside the scoring tent to speak with him(classy), and what other sport would someone lose 1M dollars with such grace.

  • SirGladiator

    There was no reason on earth for the poor guy to think that was a bunker, it wasn’t a bunker, it didn’t look like a bunker because it wasn’t one. Apparently it ‘used’ to be a bunker, but clearly the guy had no way of knowing that. Its a shame the guy missed that putt at the end, if he had won by 1 we all could just call him the ‘real’ Champion, because thats what he would’ve been, instead we’ll never know what would’ve happened had they had that playoff like they should have. In any event the rules guy who made that ruling should be fired for enforcing what may somehow have technicly been the rule, but it was a rule that nobody could’ve known they were breaking and certainly shouldn’t influence the finish of such an otherwise great tournament. This also shows what happens when Big Government makes insane rules that you can’t possibly know about or follow, you’re ‘going’ to break them sooner or later, and you’ll have to pay whatever they say you do, regardless of what’s decent or fair.

  • SoFiMil

    Another guy here whose never even gone to the range. (It’s something I’ve been wanting to do, however.) Why did the PGA official notify Johnson of the possibility of the 2-stroke penalty? I guess I’m thinking of baseball umpires where you don’t say a thing. In baseball they would have let him sign the score card and then told him, “Sorry.”

    • Doc Holliday

      in golf the players police themselves. In professional and amateur tournament golf (at the highest levels), officials are their to help the players abide by the rules.

      there is no “if you ain’t cheatin’, you ain’t tryin’ ethos on professional golf. Players do not cheat. Sure there are some very, very rare examples of accusations, like in the once a decade time span, but in general, players police themselves. If a player was proven to be a cheat, and even if he is believed to be a cheat, he would be damaged beyond repair. An example is Vijay Singh, he was accused of cheating decades ago in some far flung tournament on the other side of the world, it took him ages to get past that.

      Johnson had every right to call a rules official over before he entered the sandy area and get a ruling right there. If he had done so, this would not have happened.

      The reason why breaking a golf rule is so painful, is that 99 percent of the time the player did not know he did it. So he then signs for an incorrect score, and is later disqualified; not for breaking the rule but for signing an incorrect score.

  • Doc Holliday

    this should not be a guessing game, the hazards should be marked as hazards. If they can’t be marked, then they should not be hazards. It is not the job of the golfer to guess about this.

    However, all that needs to be changed is the local rule. I bet they at least clarify it.