« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Texas Speaker – Will Warren Chisum Do the Right Thing, Step Aside and Endorse Ken Paxton?

Anyone following the race for Texas Speaker knows that it is possible (and critical) to knock off liberal Republican Joe Straus, but that to do so requires unifying behind a single conservative alternative. Anyone, that is, except for State Rep. Warren Chisum. Or does he?

As quick background – Warren Chisum is a Democrat-turned-Republican who has been in the Texas House since 1989, representing a West Texas district (88) north of Amarillo. He’s old school Texas politics – where “conservative” means a lot of different things to a lot of different people. In October, he announced a challenge to incumbent speaker Joe Straus, a liberal Republican who was given power by 65 Democrats and 11 pathetic Republicans two years ago. After announcing, Chisum gained absolutely no traction – and frankly, after garnering a few early supporters, has been absent from the fight and rumored to be traveling and away from the state.

Meanwhile, Ken Paxton, who represents McKinney (just north of Dallas), decided that Straus needed a serious challenge. After all, Texans sent a strong message in November by boosting the number of House Republicans by 22, giving them a 99-51 super-majority over Democrats – and with 2 Democrats switching parties this month, the number is 101-49. So Paxton, a proven limited government conservative with a strong record, who is young and joined the House in 2002, has been plucking off members one-by-one, doing all the hard work required to get it done. And he has gained significant national endorsements – from former U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey and Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee to Gun Owners of America and other conservative groups.

In short – Paxton can win. Chisum cannot. It is that simple. Yet Chisum will not get out of the race and endorse Paxton with only 3 weeks left before a vote will occur on the floor of the Texas House for speaker, which right now would empower the Democrat-supported Straus. Why?

Because Chisum is more interested in making a point (but keeping his friends) than in actually winning the race (and therefore actually changing things).

At this point, I am willing to chalk it up to pure stubbornness. But if Chisum does not get out of the race this week and clear the way for Paxton to build momentum in the important task of replacing Joe Straus with a conservative, then we may have to ask what Mr. Chisum’s true motives are and begin to explore his political philosophy and voting record in detail.

The Texas Speaker is chosen by a vote on the floor of the House – by members of both Parties. But, keep in mind, there are 101 Republicans and 49 Democrats. So, the goal here is simple – we need 76 (of 101) Republicans to support Ken Paxton. Period.

There will be a Republican caucus meeting sometime before the actual vote – and it is critical that Ken be given the chance to build his support before that vote. If Chisum stays in, there are a number of Texas House members who will feel obliged to support him instead of Ken out of either longstanding friendship or to honor a commitment made before Ken announced his candidacy.

But let’s be clear – Chisum can not win, and is doing nothing to change that.

So Mr. Chisum should step aside – THIS WEEK – and support Ken Paxton. If he does not, again, we must question his motives and whether he is more interested in making a point rather than winning.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • chbroussard

    I was told he is still planning to run for the speaker position. Told the lady that he does not have the support that Paxton has and that in the best interest of the party, I would respectfully asked that he throw his support behind Rep. Paxton. I told her that the goal should be defeating Straus and if Paxton has the best chance, Mr. Chisum should recognize that and do the right thing.

    As I am not in Rep Chisum’s district, I feel pretty sure this request fell on deaf ears. If there are those here at Redstate who are in Mr. Chisum’s district, a call from you would probably go a lot further than mine did.

  • Goldwater_Conservative

    for a week now that he is going to do this, its about timing for him now.

    • cari

      the same thing. I understand that Chisum and Paxton are in daily contact with one another and that the agreement between the two of them has always been to throw their endorsement and supporters to whoever seems to have the best chance of winning. I don’t know their time frame for determining this, but I have no reason, yet, to doubt that Chisum will not keep his word.

      Paxton will be on the Mark Davis radio show tomorrow at 9:35 am central time on WBAP (820 AM) in Dallas to udate us on this race. I will be listening.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    The plain fact is that a caucus vote for settling on one candidate for Texas House Speaker is important and necessary condition for a successful outcome and a good start to the next session.

    This solves many issues: First, it avoids the great risk of letting Democrats be the ‘swing vote’ for Speaker Straus, leaving him even more beholden to the Democrat minority. Second, it avoids the concern that Chisum might ‘split’ conservative votes. The caucus will have a runoff for the top two (Straus and Paxton will be the top two), and will keep voting until we have one consensus speaker candidate supported by the majority of the caucus.

    Chisum will likely see the writing on the wall prior, and the above advice is good. Withdrawing at the appropriate time and endorsing Paxton will give Paxton some of the momentum he needs.

  • itrytobenice

    to keep Straus in the speaker’s chair, all of TX should rally to give him a nice healthy primary challenge.

    At that point, he’s a fellow traveler with the evil party.

  • Menlo

    I’m following it, and I don’t think it is possible to get rid of Straus as speaker.

  • michaelo

    Why is this fight considered unwinnable by some? They listen to Austin too much. The only thing holding the representative are a Pledge card system that Straus himself had to defeat to win orginally. Fear of the power of the Speaker? Ditto.This time, though, it is not backroom dealings working to undo the Speaker, but the very public uprising and opinion of the ‘Unwashed Masses’. As far as Austin is concerned, that won’t do. And that is EXACTLY why this fight MUST be fought.

    • michaelo

      We’ve got scads of them at http://www.northtexasteaperty.org

      • texasjohn

        http://www.northtexasteaparty.org

        Y’all had an “e” instead of an “a”. But there are some perty folks in the Tea Party… :p

    • Menlo

      You would have to have lots of reps who have said openly that they support Straus to change their minds. At this point, it would be logical to assume that the representatives’ minds are made up.

      Now retired rep David Swinford seemed to sum up their views quite well in a 2007 radio interview when asked about the views of constituents: “I don’t care.” That’s why 2007 under Craddick was no better than 2009 under Straus.

  • indi
    • JadedByPolitics

      don’t you have something more important to do like sell your soul?

    • texasgalt

      You elitist squishes are done in TX. It’s only a matter of time.

      If you weren’t worried about it, you wouldn’t be here. Old Sam would cain you for misuse of his words.

    • chbroussard

      I think old Sam was probably referring to fanatics like you. The typical Austin crowd is not representative of this state.

  • harpu

    The un-liked, un-trusted, RINO Speaker rises from behind his minions and posts.

    Do the right thing Joe…release your pledged votes and open this up to the whole of the republican party.

  • CaptainWatchdog

    The premise of this article is wrong. There is a limited pool of 150 voters in this contest.

  • melbedewy

    n/t