« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ted Cruz Makes it a New Game for U.S. Senate in Texas

This morning, former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz announced via a blogger conference call that he is a candidate for the United States Senate.

This is great news. Really great news.

It is great news for those of us who recognize the need for new leadership in our nation, and the need to elect actual, proven, limited government, Constitution-respecting conservatives – especially from states like Texas.

The field is expected to be crowded, and there will be much more to say about this going forward. But, the simple truth is that there is absolutely no room for guesswork here. We must choose a Republican candidate with a proven track record of standing up and fighting for conservative principles.

This is no time for the Charlie Crists and Arlen Specters of the world. This is no time for “trusting” that someone is a conservative (think KBH, or perhaps David Souter comes to mind). This is no time for candidates who stand up and talk a big game about being conservative but don’t have a record of ever having actually stood up to fight.

The next U.S. Senator from Texas must not only proudly declare himself a conservative, but have the battle scars to show he is ready to go to Washington and fight to take our country back from the establishment.

Now, Ted can give a rousing speech to be sure and knows that it doesn’t do any good to have something important to say if you can’t get people to listen. But what makes Ted a truly remarkable candidate are two things: first, his deeply held and very well articulated belief in America and our need to stand up to defend her against the Obama agenda and the Washington establishment, and second, his extraordinary substantive record exhibited throughout his life, highlighted by his repeated fight for the Constitution and conservative principles as Solicitor General of Texas.

We will explore his record further in the future, as we will the other candidates in the field – good and bad.

For now, check out Ted’s website where you will notice that he does not have the standard-fare political website “issue” section (where any candidate can cut and paste what his political consultant tells him is the “right” answer), but rather has sections explaining his vision and offering his track record of success fighting for conservative principles.

His vision is simple – that a new generation of leaders must rediscover the kind of leadership exhibited by Ronald Reagan and stand up and fight to preserve the promise of America. That simplicity is rooted in his own life experiences – from his family’s immigrant roots to his own hard work and dedication to the law and the Constitution.

Ted’s track record is extensive. He has fought, among other things, to defend the Second Amendment, to protect American sovereignty, to fight for religious freedom, to defend life, to protect traditional marriage, to defend the military, to protect tort reform, to fight for voter ID – and perhaps most of all, to defend Texas from federal intervention into our way of living and doing things.

Without analyzing his merits vis-a-vis other potential candidates for now – it is important to know that Ted is the real deal. He is in this race to win it – and he brings to the race a deep knowledge of and commitment to the Constitution and our founding principles, and a proven record of fidelity to them. And that is why he is running. While he knows the chattering class will question his “readiness” for U.S. Senate without having run for a “lower” office – he also knows that the time is now to take our country back, and he looks out across the current Republican leadership and sees the void that we all see.

Ted understands why freedom matters. He was raised by his parents to appreciate the America to which his immigrant father fled Cuba at the age of 18 to escape torture by the Batista government of the time. Jay Nordlinger explains this well in a 2009 National Review article about Ted.

In short, any conservative who wants a Republican Party made up of conservative leaders who actually “get it,” and who wants to change the Senate, and thus the nation, one seat at a time should give Ted Cruz a long hard look. You will find a lot to like and may well just be inspired again.

It’s a new game in Texas.

COMMENTS

  • red_oakster

    Hopefully by the end of the summer, we’ll have a clear winner.

    Either man in my view will make a fine Senator.

  • IJB

    We all know how this is going to play out now – two (or more ) “true conservatives” are going to battle it out in the Primary, allowing the well-financed, most “establishment” candidate (Dewhurst) to slip through and win (see: IN SEN Primary, 2010).

    This has happened a *lot* in GOP primaries lately – too many conservatives running, allowing the moderates to slip on through and win.

    I hope it doesn’t happen here too, but TX has already elected a ‘squish’ as TX House Speaker, so I’m not particularly hopeful that the result will be any different in this SEN race here.

    For all of the talk of TX being “conservative”, their most prominent politicians sure don’t turn out that way…

    • red_oakster

      First, fundraising may well separate the two.

      Second, Indiana was a last minute vacancy and Coats enjoyed lots of conservative support (including Pence). In contrast, there’s lots of time to vet the Texas candidates. Roger Williams is also running, and he’ll take votes from Dewhurst. So there’s some reason to hope that one of two conservatives will emerge as a stronger candidate and that the establishment side will be divided.

  • http://practicalgopvoter.blogspot.com/ texasproud

    I stil think we need Michael Williams here. Don’t get me wrong, Ted Cruz is great in person and giving a speech, but if you have ever met Michael Williams, you will come away inspired to a whole different level. Dewhurst isn’t a Charlie Crist-he’s just a mediocre candidate who will win elections and vote the righ way, but would be invisible on floor fights because he doesn’t project as a strong personality. Roger Williams would have been my choice if he would have run for Governor last year, but if you seen him twice you can quote his stump speech. Good man, just a step below Cruz and Michael Williams. Greg Abbott would be appealing and Dallas Mayor Leppert has been a good mayor but he is also a step below in my opinion. Michael Williams is a dynamic inspiring leader who would be a leader in the Senate in a way we hope Rand Paul and Marco Rubio will be. I think Cruz could be as well, but I want him to be our next Attorney General.

  • freemanja1991

    Ever won an election? or is his position appointed, by whom?

    • sergios

      Johnson never won an election before his 2010 WI Sen run, neither did Franken before 2008 or Webb before 2006.

      If he can raise the money, this won’t be an issue for him. We just can’t divide teh conservative grassroots vote and let a squish through.

      • freemanja1991

        Johnson is independently wealthy. Franken has star power and some money and in a state that favors him Based on the DFL behind his name. And Webb also had a lot going for him. As much as I don’t like career politicians Williams has faced the Texas electorate (statewide) 3 times. Proof that he can win.

  • jackhammer

    40 year old incredibly eloquent and intelligent latino man….with Ivy League credentials through and through….he actually is on paper what Obamaniacs think zerO is.

    Williams is too old, and that bowtie blows it.

    So, on that basis I would definitely be for Cruz….

    • pilgrim
      • jackhammer

        and I am saying Cruz is a potential superstar.

        He has everything, he is smarter and talks better (in all circumstances) than even Ryan and Rubio….he can bring points across…while being a full n, no apology conservative, he has the demeanor to engage people on the left, and convince them that he is right….he is great at preachign to the choir, btu he can win over the sinners too…

        I’ve run into him since 1992, and have never seen anyone more firmly right, who gains respect from everyone around him, even those who believe they detest everythign he believes in….

        He has a lot of Reagan qualities…and trust me, give him a topic, and let him talk, and he will never ever need a teleprompter,a dn you will never hear an “um”

        • jackhammer

          and he is 20-4 in front of the supreme court….

          and I am a person who only really likes 2 lawyers, and those are Ted Cruz and Dan McLaughlin…..otherwise I would never like to see anyone else who attended a law school ever do anything political ever again….

          • txgho1911

            I would hope those potential POTUS candidates from Texas go through the Governor’s office and not the Senate.
            I do not know Cruz but I look forward to learning all about him in the next few months. If he is a POTUS candidate in the future I would hope he bails quick and aim to follow Perry.

    • pilgrim
      • jackhammer

        Getting behind Michael Williams is like taking Nolan Ryan in 1990 over Roger Clemens.

        Michael Williams is an exciting candidate…..great for statewide office, with current trajectory potential of becoming a senator, and being a good conservative there.

        Ted Cruz is an exciting candidate with less experience, and EXPONENTIALLY MORE POTENTIAL…..

        If you can’t understand that, then you are the person who shouldn’t be taken seriously.

        A bowtie and firebrand politics on the Senate floor will rally the choir, but won’t be someone who garners positive national attention and momentum….just like there is no national politiician I can think fo with a goatee….

        • pilgrim

          I do not know where you live, but I can tell you that I will seriously look at which candidate I choose to vote for to be my US Senator. My top priorities are not going to be based on whether the candidate is in his 40′s or in his 50′s, whether the candidate wears a bow tie or a straight tie, and whether the candidate has aspirations for running for President. My major priority will be to vote for the most conservative candidate that has the best likelihood of winning the majority of votes needed. You can appeal to me to consider Ted Cruz if you consider this priority. The post that you made as a reason to support Cruz does not appeal to me at all.

          • jackhammer

            if you don’t care why comment 3 times?

            Both are electable….for me Cruz has more upside potential, but you are a Texas voter, and I’m not.

  • carlfromgeorgia

    1) One or the other of these candidates will seem clearly better by election day.
    2) No one can slip through with less than 50% because there is a run off
    3) Dewhurst would probably be a better Senator than Cornyn, certainly better than Hutchisn and the fact that he is probably the worst of the serious contenders for conservatives probably bodes well.

  • E Pluribus Unum

    And like hogan says,he has the track record to prove all those credentials. Redstaters may remember he spoke at the Redstate Gathering 2009 in Atlanta.

    But my, what a crowded field. I never wanted to have to choose between Ted Cruz and Michael Williams, hoping one would kmock off KBH in 2012 and the other would knock off Cornyn in 2014.

    Still might play out that way. Think of them as significant upgrades.

    • freemanja1991

      Punch the voters in Austin is not a good idea sorry.

      • E Pluribus Unum

        As long as I dont putcrosshairs on them……

        • freemanja1991

          The Hippies there will be equally offended

  • SirGladiator

    In most states this would actually be bad news, like in Indiana where we divided the Conservative vote and let the least Conservative candidate win. But Texas has what all states should have, a Runoff system. The most liberal candidate won’t be able to sneak in, he will simply make a runoff, then lose to the Conservative candidate with the most votes in round 1. I look forward to an awesome, and positive, primary campaign on the issues. We as Conservatives will be winners whether its Cruz or whether its Williams that makes the runoff and beats the more liberal guy. Welcome to the race Teddy!

    • freemanja1991

      waste of money. But I like how NC does it with 40% but 50% can be ridiculous with crowded fields. Or Iowa 35% but then the party pics the candidate at convention. Then there needs to be a stomping rule, Like for Nikki Haley being with in 1 point of 50% and a head over 20 points. Like if the nearest candidate is more than 15 points away no runoff. And It can prolong the process and in close races let the dems decide their candidate faster and gain an advantage while we in fight.

  • http://www.WILLisms.com WILLisms

    I’m a Texas Republican primary voter, and I am voting for Michael Williams.