« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Democrat’s “middle class tax cut” is a populist red herring

From the diaries, by Erick

I want to make my priorities clear from the start. One: middle class families need permanent tax relief. And two: I believe we can’t afford to borrow and spend another $700 billion on permanent tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.

That is a line from President Obama’s weekly radio address last week. He’s referring to the coming tax hikes as the Bush Tax Cuts are due to sunset on December 31st. Interestingly, the reason the sunset provision is there in the first place is because Tom Daschle, (the then Democrat leader in the Senate) threatened a filibuster without it. That phrase tells you everything you need to know about President Obama’s sincerity when he talks about putting jobs and the economy first.

On Friday the unemployment numbers came out and the rate had crept back up to 9.8% as employers added a mere 39,000 jobs in October. At the same time President Obama and the Democrats are seeking to extend unemployment benefits beyond the already unprecedented 99 week limit. Ninety-nine weeks! That is two years of receiving a government check for doing nothing. (That doesn’t’ mean that unemployed people are literally doing nothing, but by definition they are not working.) I’m not sure how long it takes to develop a bad habit, but two years is probably a pretty good start. That causes one to wonder what is the bad habit forming effect of a government check on someone who has been receiving welfare for years…

Back to the Democrat red herring.

As President Obama’s words demonstrate, the Democrats are seeking to manipulate the conversation using populist rhetoric to demonize the rich. At the core of their “solution” to our financial problems is their effort to raise taxes on the “millionaires and billionaires” while giving the middle class a tax cut. Republicans are fighting this effort, suggesting that doing so will harm job growth. The GOP position is based on the fact that small businesses are the engine of the American economy and create three out of every four new jobs in the country. That’s relevant because most small businesses owners file their taxes using personal income tax returns… and those are where the taxes are going to go up. Here are the numbers for the top two tax brackets:

For those in the second highest bracket – families with income between $171,851 and $373,650 – their tax bill is going to increase by ten percent as the rate moves from 33% to 36%. For those in the highest tax bracket – families with income above $373,650 – they will see their tax bill rise by 13% as the rate jumps from 35% to 39.6%.

Democrats are quick to point out that only 3% of small business filers are subject to the two highest tax brackets. That is true. Most small businesses are sole proprietorships where the business in question is a side venture to supplement income. Think of someone who sells comic books on eBay, dabbles as a real estate agent or designs websites on the side. What is far more important however is that while only 3% of small businesses are subject to the highest tax rates, the businesses that make up that 3% represent 44% of all small business income. Let’s do a little math problem:

IF: Small business represents over 75% of all net new job creation in the Unite States;
AND IF: 3% of small businesses generate 44% of all small business income and a similar number of jobs;
AND IF: Democrats want to raise taxes on the small businesses that fall in that 3%;
THEN: Democrats want to raise taxes on companies that are expected to be responsible for 33% of all new jobs.

That simple problem tells you everything you need to know about President Obama and the Democrats. Despite their rhetoric about wanting to put people back to work, they simply don’t care about actually creating jobs and growing the American economy. If you need even more proof, consider the coming tax hike on dividends. Dividends are currently taxed at 15%. On January 1st the dividend tax rate will skyrocket to 39.6%. (Oh, and don’t forget the ObamaCare 1099 fiasco that will hammer small businesses) So, not only do we have Democrats seeking a direct tax increase on the small businesses who are supposed to create one third of all new jobs, at the same time they are discouraging investment in companies that are successful enough to be able to pay dividends at all… many of whom probably have and hire employees.

President Obama and the Democrats, in using the red herring of “middle class tax cuts” to pander to their progressive base are willing to sacrifice jobs and job creation so they can further cripple capitalism and push even more Americans into the fold of government dependency. As the economy slows and jobs evaporate expect Democrats to seek to extend unemployment benefits to 129 weeks then perhaps 159 weeks and then maybe be made permanent. At the end of the day that is exactly what Democrats want… they want to take everything the rich have stolen from the poor and the middle class and simply redistribute it. That of course is a house of cards as the rich have options about where they invest their money and even where they live or start their businesses. At some point when everyone becomes a ward of the state there is no one left on the other side from whom the state can take everything to support itself, that house of cards will eventually come crashing down. Hopefully 2012 will usher in some new homebuilders.

COMMENTS

  • Pingback: The heart diet to prevent or reverse heart disease

  • izoneguy

    Democrats want to raise taxes on companies that are expected to be responsible for 33% of all new jobs

    Thank you for that thoughtful analysis that most of the MSM would not get.

    I saw a report last night on our local news….
    They said if someone made $10,000,000 then the republicans would be giving them an extra $450,000….What????
    Who writes this stuff? And what “wage earner” would make $10 Million
    per year? A few CEO’s I guess but let’s get real.
    $10,000,000 is what a small business might gross.
    Let’s forget net vs. gross for a minute.
    In simple terms – $450,000 would be 10 jobs at $45,000 per year.
    This is the dis-connect that the democrats make. And how many people have you heard saying that the “Bush Tax Cuts” have not panned out so let’s kill it…..
    Folks – let’s put in all in perspective. Just imagine how much worse the economy would be WITHOUT the Bush Tax rates????
    The Bush Tax Cuts are what has helped America weather this socialist storm we find ourselves in….and as sure as the sun rises – our ship will sink if Obama gets his tax hike…….

  • WarEagle01

    Very well done. Excellent analysis, imperfectamerica.

  • njrocket

    How many jobs have the Bush tax cuts created: Nada!!! Bush lost jobs, not created them. Small business? How many small business employ 500 people or net $250K??? The is very, very few. Net income is what get taxed, not gross income. If you are a middle-class Republican voter, ask yourself: “What has my party done for ME lately?” They surely have helped those making over half a mil an year, but not working people.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …that you were pretending to be a Republican.

    Ta.

  • gekster
  • Duke

    I presently have two individuals on my payroll who work part time for me after retiring from their careers. Both are getting unemployment and have been doing so for the past couple of years. One guy is 70 years old and the other is 64. Neither intends to ever go back to work full-time, and both are collecting their pensions, and I assume Social Security.

    Can someone with greater intelligence than me please tell me why we’re paying them Unemployment for the past two years when they’re retired? What effect would removing all the retirees from the Unemployment rolls have on the businesses that have to pay into unemployment?

    I checked with the aparatchiks at the Unemployment office and they gave me a lengthy explanation that boils down to, “You gotta pay.”

  • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

    First, I have to say I resent your insinuation that people getting unemployment have developed or may develop a “habit”. Unemployment benefits are too small to develop anything, other than a disgust for cheap food.

    I’m laid off. I get unemployment. I’m working 60 hours a week on my small farm trying to make ends meet. Come here. Get up with me at 4:30AM, work along side me till 6:30PM and see if its something you fear may become a “habit”.

    Don’t paint those of us who are unemployed with too broad, nor too easy a brush. It is unfair.

    Second, are we really to shed a tear because dividends will be taxed at a higher rate? For how long have rich, fat white guys sat in air-conditioned offices making cash hand over fist and getting taxed at 15%?

    We have a problem in this country. One we need everybody to step up to and try to be part of the solution. And you whine because part of that solution may be a higher tax rate for dividends?

    You have to be careful to check YOUR sense of entitlement.

  • kstone

    With all due respect, since when is someone “working 60 hours a week on my small farm” considered unemployed? Your farm IS your job.

    Secondly, you ask “For how long have rich, fat white guys sat in air-conditioned offices making cash hand over fist and getting taxed at 15%?”

    Apparently you never learned out on the farm that dividends tax rates effects millions of middle class Americans like myself who are nowhere near rich. In fact, by owning a farm, you have a hell of a lot more money than an apartment dweller like me.

  • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

    I can try very hard to make up some lost income by being “self employed” here. I am still eligible for unemployment since its very difficult to go over the limit that would terminate it.

    I’ve learned all I need to know about dividend payments. For instance, I’ve learned how hard you had to work to earn that income. Poor thing.

    What I haven’t learned out here on the farm is why your income – that you didn’t lift a finger to earn – should be taxed at half the rate my hard earned income is.

    Entitlement?

  • izoneguy

    How much is your farm worth? Maybe it’s time to sell it.
    I own a small business. I am the only employee. I cannot qualify for unemployment insurance. I have weeks & weeks that go by where I do not make any money. I have to sell stuff on e-bay and do other things to make money. And when I am not making money I work 12-14 hours a day beating the bushes looking for work. But what I have not done – or ever done – or ever will do is go collect a check from the government. I am been “self-employed” for over 30 years. Maybe it’s the DNA but I know several people that collect government checks and they say – “Why would I go flip burgers for $10 per hour? I would have to pay taxes on that and I would “lose” money”. And here we go – another 13 months for the 99′s. I do not at all wish anyone to starve to death. But at some point you have to say – sorry you need to go flip burgers.