« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

DOJ Not Even Pretending to be Nonpartisan Anymore

I’d read something about this several days ago, but for some reason, I decided not to post on it. Now, it’s surfaced again. The Obama Justice Department isn’t even trying to appear to be non-partisan anymore (did they ever try in the first place, though?). Eric Holder is doing his best to scare black pastors into encouraging their congregations to vote for Obama using the Voter ID ruse. Our “sacred” right to vote is in danger of being taken away thanks to evil Voter ID laws and other trumped up charges. Says Politico:

The attorney general told them his office is “aggressively” taking on the task of protecting that right, including challenging several state lawsuits that would overturn key provisions of the Voting Rights Act involving redistricting in Southern states and strict new voter ID laws that strips away the guarantee of equal access to the ballot box in the 2012 election.

But this is just a classic example of projection. The only mass, organized assaults on voting rights today are being perpetuated by the Democratic Party.

But don’t take my word for it. Take the words of newly-minted Republican former Congressman Artur Davis, an erstwhile member of both the Democratic Party and the Congressional Black Caucus:

The truth is that the most aggressive contemporary voter suppression in the African American community, at least in Alabama, is the wholesale manufacture of ballots, at the polls and absentee, in parts of the Black Belt.

Voting the names of the dead, and the nonexistent, and the too-mentally-impaired to function, cancels out the votes of citizens who are exercising their rights — that’s suppression by any light. If you doubt it exists, I don’t; I’ve heard the peddlers of these ballots brag about it, I’ve been asked to provide the funds for it, and I am confident it has changed at least a few close local election results.

So what I’m trying to figure out is why a black Attorney General who serves under a black President is telling black ministers to tell their congregations to support what is essentially the disenfranchisement of black voters. Wait…what?

Or perhaps they want it that way.

Either way, that’s a discussion for another post. What is important is that our nation’s leading law enforcer is opposing the surest way we now have to ensure that people are who they say they are–that they are a living, breathing U.S. citizen who is qualified to vote. Somehow, this is discriminatory. Now, Mr. Holder might not be telling them outright who to vote for, but by these scare tactics, he’s implying with all the subtlety of a dumptruck crashing through a nitroglycerin plant that voting Republican is definitely a no-no. Republicans support Voter ID laws, the evil racists.

COMMENTS

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Because if the fraudulent voters have to prove they are the dead person they were told is on the rolls it means they’ll have to take the extra time/effort and expense to get fake ID…

    • Next93

      Ever wonder why election day is the week after Haloween? It takes that long for the dead Democrats to shuffle from the graveyard to the polling place.

    • 1stRichard

      In my little W/Mass college town, we had about ninety percent turnout to elect Obama but reports say twenty percent on the voter list are dead or have moved and normal turnout is under thirty percent. The dead do vote!

  • Next93

    There’s only one party in America that has systematically disenfranchised black people. They did it for the 85 years prior to the Civil War through slavery, and they did it for the 100 years after the Civil War through Jim Crow laws that were lovingly legislated, enacted, and enforced at every level of the state, county/parish, and municipal governments. And when the legal path didn’t work, they relied on thier military wing, the KKK to perform unspeakable acts of barbarism on men, women, and children. And since the Civil Rights act, they’ve been disenfranchising black people through soft expectations and policies designed to buy black votes using tax dollars. It is a party that has demonstrated a beleif that black people simply can’t be held to the same standards of white people, and has done so since the early days of thie Republic.

    That party was NOT the GOP. It wasn’t a Republican who stood on the steps of the Alabama state house and delared “Segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!”. It wasn’t a Republican who used an axe handle as his symbol in a successful run for the governorship of Georgia. It wasn’t Republicans who murdered civil rights workers in Mississipi, and it wasn’t a Republican DA who refused to prosecute those murderers.

    Maybe Eric Holder should spend a little more time reading actual history rather than the fantasies of his Hollywood supporters, because if you want to protect the sacred right to vote, it’s not the GOP you need to watch out for.

  • lineholder

  • unsk

    When these illegal efforts by Holder are put into the overall context of what is happening this election, including of the “Swat-ing” of Eric and others, for practical purposes, the only people with a chance to have any effect to combat these activities are the Republican Leadership in Congress. The pernicious nature and the Jackboot tactics of the Obama Administration make it very difficult for private citizens and the blogging community to counter these assaults on our rights. Only the Republican Leadership has the standing and the power to put an end to this. The Left knows this and that is why the Leadership’s continued silence only eggs on these scumbags.

    The problem here is that unless these attacks on our constitutional rights are stopped right here now and right now , the Democrats will only step up to more and more egregious attacks. And before you know it, our free elections will be a thing of the past. That is the Left’s goal and they are well on their way to accomplishing it.

    McConnell, Boehner, Cantor, McCarthy as well as Romney, absolutely must step up here. If they run away and hide again as they have done in the past, they are as complicit in these assaults on the Constitution as Kimberlin and rest of the criminal Left.

  • dilligas

    How come Mr. Artur Davis never came forward with these accusations before (conveniently) switching parties in an effort to get re-elected?

    I’m guessing the statute of limitations has expired for the direct knowledge of the unlawful acts he is aware of then?

    If nothing else, where is the state AG to question him on what he knew / when he knew it / etc.

    Even if he didn’t provide the funds he claims that were solicited from him, unless he reported it, isn’t he admitting to conspiracy towards fraudulent voting?

    • gekster

      Very good questions you raise.

    • http://jakespeaks.wordpress.com/ Jake Walker

      This isn’t a new editorial, after all.

      I would like them to be answered, as well.

      Although, I’d say his switch has more to do with a genuine change of heart.

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      (has he confirmed the switch?), but he wrote his editorial about the Voter ID law several months ago.

      It will be interesting to see where he goes from here, but his eyes were opened to the Democrat machine after they turned on him because he didn’t vote in lockstep 100%. In the 2010 gubernatorial race here in Alabama, the Dems nominated a man who can barely put two words together because Davis demonstrated he had a mind of his own.

      Doesn’t mean I’m a fan (yet), but Davis is worth watching if his conversion is genuine. Based on what I saw of him here in Alabama, I happen to think it probably is, and I certainly hope so. because he could be a great asset for our side if that’s the case.

  • jimmaloney

    …silly me, I just had the thought that the more they find and register false and imaginary voters-with the clear intention, some would argue, of being challenged and revealed for what they are with the accompanying publicity and notoriety, the less time the responsible media has to question the issues of the Fraud-In-Chief and his “Mini-Me” the AG…

  • bs61

    not so blind under Holder! He and his social justice are a digrace!

  • checkmate2012

    No different than sending out WH staff/cabinet officials to boast O’care- Its against the law!

    Except for Issa who holds relevent hearings, the country is sinking while they debate on Roger Clements and Edwards…who cares? No one. They’re done and gone so why waste taxpayer $ on has-beens. Sure lying to Congress is important but hasn’t Holder done the same? Yes indeed.

  • GregInFla

    Those same disenfranchised voters seem to find their govt-issued picture ID to get on the dole and apply for their government checks. And then they use it either cash that check or open a bank account for it. Maybe if the voting polls were located at the welfare offices, no one would complain. Of course, there’d have to be a check or SNAP stamps there as well.

    • fredflintlock

      A cursory search: ID required for welfare application

      Some quick results:
      Bing Results Page

      And in California of all places:
      http://www.ehow.com/how_5205565_apply-welfare-california.html

      Looks like members of the dependent class already have ID.
      Another bogus leftist myth busted.

      • funwithknives

        Again…make them S T O P !!!!!!!

        Michigan is one of the most racially polarized states in America and we have Voter I D . Voting day comes around and Eric Holder,DOJ officials, or any protests are seldom, if ever, seen.

        What could be wrong, hereabouts?
        Where’s A Guiding Hand when you need one…?

  • teapartypatriot4ever

    Just like Stalin, Hitler, Mao, etc, They all have their crony henchmen to do their dirty work for them. And Obama and Holder are no different. This is what elections have consequences, as history has shown. But People must realize that they are as much part of the problem as the ones they put into power and office, as in a Republic Representative Democracy, they have that ultimate responsibility, thus on 6 Nov, they either must rectify that mistake, or forever be slaves of the State, and.lose the those Freedoms, Liberties and Rights that their forebearers have so bravely fought and died for, forever..

    But as usual, I can see they just laugh and say your an extremist alarmist and continue playing with their video games and stuffing their faces with donuts and pizza and beer,until one day when their is a knock on the door, and or their is a bullhorn yelling at the them to come onto the street and bring only 1 suitcase, By then it will be too late.. Amazing..

  • http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php kralizec

    Holder is a left-wing extremist partisan hack who should be defied at every opportunity. States need to tell this little tyrant to go to hell and back it up with state police and national guard if he tries to interfere.

  • http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php kralizec

    Holder is a left-wing extremist partisan hack who should be defied at every opportunity. States need to tell this little tyrant to go to hell and back it up with state police and national guard if he tries to interfere.

  • tnguy

    Alexander (R-TN)
    Bennett (R-UT)
    Bond (R-MO)
    Chambliss (R-Ga)
    Collins (R-ME)
    Corker (R-TN)
    Graham (R-SC)
    Grassley (R-IA)
    Gregg (R-NH)
    Hatch (R-UT)
    Isakson (R-GA)
    Kyl (R-AZ)
    Lugar (R-IN)
    McCain (R-AZ)
    Murkowski (R-AK)
    Sessions (R-AL)
    Snowe (R-ME)
    Specter (R-PA)
    Voinovich (R-OH)

    No surprising names there.

    • GregInFla

      Sides are mixed on Hatch’s bid to stay in the Senate. Levin defends him on the basis of past SCOTUS votes and leadership. But what his vote on Holder? Hatch did vote against Sotomayor and Kagan.

      • conservativerock5

        Are also in Liljenquist as well as the qualities Hatch is missing

        • GregInFla

          And simply bow out after two terms. That’s twelve years in the Senate. Official limits should not be necessary. Besides, stepping down creates a job for someone else. Hopefully Barack Obama will create a job by leaving the WH in January. That would be one more than he’s created in 4 years.

  • tnguy

    …GWB had a republican congress for 5 of his 8 years and did virtually nothing about this, even though voter fraud nearly cost him 2 elections.

    No one can tell me with even a scrap of justification that voting for liberal and moderate (R)’s makes any sense at all, save in places like Massachusetts, but certainly not in southern or midwestern states, where all we’re doing is entrenching losers like Lamar Alexander for decades. That loser mentality is destroying our party and country.

  • checkmate2012

    Per Brietbart.com:

    “On Saturday, Massachusetts delegates will meet in their state’s Democrat party convention. The votes of these delegates will determine whether there are primary elections for their party nominations. With so much at state, Democrats have decided to implement Voter ID requirements:

    A PHOTO ID WILL BE REQUIRED TO ENTER THE MASSMUTUAL CENTER”

    Hypocrits they are!! And Holder is repulsive.

  • wbb1950

    As the Obama campaign and his big media surrogates struggle to reposition their man from the revolutionary leader they posited in 2008 to the conventional politician they posit now, who bears no responsibility for anything that goes wrong, the question is can it be done? The French have a saying on this?a revolution eats its children. In other words, those who lead a revolution do not necessarily end up enjoying the fruits of their labors and are more likely to become its victims. The other point is even when a revolutionary leader survives the transition, he does so by liquidate the Ancien R?gime before it can regroup and thwart his transformational plans. Castro is a case in point. Obama tried to banish FOX from the Washington Press Corps, and to place their programming under White House surveillance by Dunn. But he failed. Furthermore, the centerpiece of his transformational agenda?Obamacare, is likely to suffer an ignominious death at the hands of the Supreme Court. He may think he can rally the base around that defeat , and conservatives may worry that he will, but those hopes or apprehensions are overshadowed by the fact that said reversal will be seen as one more failure in governance which must be explained away to an increasingly skeptical audience, as the economic picture grows bleaker by the day. The pundits tell us this will be a close election. But if people came to realize that to support him is to endorse continuing failure I wonder. To me that is the message coming out of California, courtesy of Rassmussen?that today in the bluest of blue states his approval rating has slipped below 50%. To me, that harbingers a landslide for the Republican challenger similar to 1980, as opposed to a narrow victory for the incumbent as the Obama campaign and his fellow travelers believe will happen.

  • Pingback: look