« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Musings on the Vanishing Oil Spill, Romney vs. Palin, North Korea’s Diplomatic Victory, and Sundries

The world, always an interesting place, has not disappointed for news in the last few weeks. Below are some thoughts on just a few recent events.

President Obama appeared this morning, the 87th day of the Gulf oil spill, to discuss the spill and BP’s relief efforts. According to the Heritage Foundation, today was the first time since June 22 that Obama had publicly acknowledged the spill’s existence. If you’re keeping score, that’s 24 days of publicly ignoring the spill’s existence, beginning 7 days after Obama used his first Oval Office address to tell us all what a tragedy this disaster was, and how its occurrence somehow meant that we needed to pay his government significantly more in taxes.

I guess he was so busy in the intervening 24 days — nearly a month — looking for an “ass to kick,” he couldn’t find the time to mention the ongoing spill. Or maybe he was just too busy playing the latest of the 10 rounds of golf he’s enjoyed since the April 20 Deepwater Horizon disaster — nearly half the number of rounds his predecessor, George W. Bush, played in his entire 8 year tenure.  If Nero earned permanent notoriety for fiddling while his Empire’s capital city burned, what should Obama face after playing round after round of golf while the greatest man-made environmental disaster in human history was going on?

Obama’s decision to finally acknowledge, for the first time in nearly a month, that oil is still spewing into the Gulf is a very good sign for BP’s current relief effort. His 24 days of silence on the topic suggest that there’s no way Obama would be talking oil spill now if he hadn’t been assured that there was some major ongoing, or imminent, improvement in the situation he could safely take credit for.

And speaking of energy taxes and dependence, here’s something worth noting: even the backward (to say the least) Islamic “Republic” of Iran is taking significant steps to reduce its dependence on foreign fuel sources, upping its refining capacity in hopes of cutting gasoline imports by up to 75% in the next five years. Score one for the Persian state, which has shown itself, in at least one area, to be more truly “progressive” than the rigid ideologues currently attempting to lead America while permanently sojourning in energy independence fantasyland.

A real – and “comprehensive,” to use a pet liberal term in its correct setting – solution to America’s imported energy problem can be found in more efficient use of our domestic fossil fuel sources, and in expanding our use of nuclear energy. However, rather than seeking to implement actual solutions to our energy problem, the American left remains obsessed with their radical – and incredibly unrealistic ideas of what so-called “clean energy” should be. This, unfortunately, will do nothing but further increase our dependence on foreign energy sources, while further driving down an already failing Obama economy.

Speaking of backward nations, the world’s largest gathering of them — the United Nations — finally came to a decision on what action to take with regard to North Korea’s sinking of the South Korean Navy ship Cheonan, which resulted in the deaths of 46 ROK sailors.  Unsurprisingly, that decision was to condemn the act, but to make no mention whatsoever of the culprit. The Presidential Statement released by the UN Security Council paid lip service to South Korea’s claim of North Korean culpability, but then proceeded to “[take] note of the responses from other relevant parties, including from the DPRK, which has stated that it had nothing to do with the incident.”

The result, according to the statement, was that “the Security Council condemns the attack which led to the sinking of the Cheonan” — whoever the unnamed culprit might be.  Unsurprisingly, the former community organizer’s administration declared this milquetoast condemnation of an act with no mention of its culprit to be a strong, bold move against the out of control regime in Pyongyang.  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared that the UNSCR’s statement “sends a clear message that such irresponsible and provocative behavior … will not be tolerated.”  North Korea, on the other hand, declared the non-condemnation condemnation a “great diplomatic victory” for Pyongyang.

I’ll leave it to you to decide which party — Obama administration official Hillary Clinton, or the Pyongyang regime — hit closer to the actual truth with their post-Presidential Statement spin.

Via our own Dan McLaughlin, it looks like Mitt Romney is polling better with disaffected Obama voters than he is with Republicans.  This tells me two things about those respective groups of potential voters: (1) That the former hope-and-changers who are now disaffected Obama voters remain as gullible as ever, and (2) that Republican voters are more knowledgeable about their potential candidates in general, and the architect of the RomneyCare disaster in particular, than we often give them credit for.

I’ll look with interest for further degradation of Romney’s numbers among Republicans in the next week, now that an “adviser” of his has been reported as saying former Alaska Governor, and current Tea Party/activist Republican darling, Sarah Palin is “not a serious human being.”

If you need a crystal-clear sign of how radioactive Democrats have become during their period of governmental dominance under President Obama (D-IL), Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), look no further than South Carolina, where the idea of supporting the Democrat establishment candidate was so distasteful to voters that they nominated an unemployed veteran with a dishonorable military discharge who had no campaign apparatus, and no cash on hand other than a stack of unemployment checks (thanks, Democrats!) he saved up to afford the $10,440 qualifying fee.

The fact that Rep. Clyburn (D-SC) and his allies in the crumbling Democrat establishment have called Greene a “Republican plant” speaks to just how out of touch the Democrats in government really are with those they purport to represent. Expect a lot more of this kicking, screaming, and Obama-style reflexive finger-pointing this November, when the American people exercise their right and their desire to throw out the dictocrats who are currently piloting our ship of state into the rockiest shoreline they can find.

I’ve been skeptical of The Daily Caller — from its name, which sounds like the shady guy living up the street who your mom tell you to call “uncle,” to its overall usefulness as a news site — for quite some time now.  However, Tucker Carlson has truly hit one out of the park with his appropriation of http://keitholbermann.com, his personal utilization of the email address keith@keitholbermann.com, and his promise to hand out @keitholbermann.com email addresses to TDC readers.  The pleasure gained from watching militant leftists’ heads explode at this (here’s a sample) is only exceeded by the eminently gratifying experience of watching an arrogant windbag who makes his meager living calling out individuals as “The Worst Person in the World” on a nightly basis absolutely flip out over an enterprising commentator’s gall in poking some good-natured fun at him.

Way to go, Tucker!

Even The Politico has woken up to the fact that the Left’s New Great Communicator, Barack Obama, and his administration as a whole, have turned out “to be not especially good at politics or communications.” Add to that the fact that more people are realizing that, as NRO’s Andy McCarthy put it, “race obsession of the Obama administration is a sight to behold,” and the public perception woes of this administration may only increase in the near future.

I was at Turner Field last night for the Atlanta Braves’ 2-1 win over the Milwaukee Brewers.  Like a fair number of Braves fans this year, I watch the team as much to see rookie phenom Jason Heyward as anything else.  The young man — at 20 years old, he just barely qualifies as a “man” — is not only a phenomenally talented baseball player, but his striking level of humility, poise, and maturity sets him apart from his peers.  Compare this young man, who is the consummate team player and who goes about his business on the field and off with maturity and professionalism, to those in his age cohort who are (or in some cases were) playing college football up GA Highway 316 at my alma mater, the University of Georgia, and the difference between a young man raised to have humility, and those who have been raised to feel 100% entitled, could not be made more clear.

Is there a better metaphor for Barack Obama’s out-of-touch presidency than his statement this morning that he didn’t feel the record earthquake that shook DC this morning? Okay, okay — there are plenty of metaphors for Obama’s amazing lack of a connection with the American people, but this is a pretty good one.

In the interest of time, space, and your sanity, that’s it for now. I’ll be back next week with more food for thought.

COMMENTS

  • redneck_hippie

    push for fuel independence is connected with a perceived threat of sanctions?

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

      They have a ridiculous amount of fuel available beneath their soil — both oil and natural gas. However, they’ve been net fuel importers due to poor refining capacity and technology.

      This could have been spurred in part by sanctions, but it makes sense for them anyway because they have the resources in-country and just need to take advantage of them.

      • redneck_hippie
      • aesthete

        How are they going to attract investors, or is their government just going to go it alone? If it’s the latter, I think it smacks more of desperation than savviness; virtually every government foray in resource management without a significant business or investor component and cooperation from the same (as Alaska and Norway, for instance, have) has failed miserably and in a high-profile way. Examples including Venezuela, the former USSR, and the smattering of African countries that have attempted this surely haven’t slipped the minds of Iran’s policymakers.

  • http://www.2010blog.net jsanzone

    Or, maybe just premeditated based on facts that nobody but BP and the White House knew…but, Obama’s trip to Maine falls one day after the spill was finally plugged. Imagine if he were dallying around in Maine while the oil was still gushing?

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

      …suggest he’s not too worried about his “let them eat cake,” “play golf while the Gulf burns” image.

      • http://www.2010blog.net jsanzone

        For all the pomp during the campaign, it’s surprising how seemingly lax this administration is about imaging.

  • Brian_Roastbeef

    You know I’ve never been all that trusting of statements made by an “anonymous aide” particularly to a liberal rag such as Time magazine.

    2010 looms large… and a good way for Democrats to weaken us now is to splinter the Palinistas, with the non-Palinistas. Democrats, who have a zombie like tendency to support around personalities rather than principles, see us in the same way. So, why not engineer a feud between Palin and Romney so that their zombie like followers can fight each other rather than beating up on Democrats this fall?

    That’s why seeing statements such as the one in the post about looking “with interest for further degradation of Romney’s numbers” concerns me. Its exactly the sort of interest the left would want Palinistas to take. Destroy yet another Republican, or maybe two, while Harry and Nancy survive to laugh at the downfall.

    A lot of people may not like Romney, just as a lot don’t care for Palin, but the simple fact is both are helping Republicans nationwide. Romney was actually the first of the two to back Nikki Haley. Together the two are a strong punch. Romney can get loads of money to a candidate, while Palin can engineer some popular enthusiasm.

    I’ve seen little from Romney and Palin themselves that argue a rivalry. Until then, it is these anonymous sources that tend to speak only to liberal media that should avoid being taken seriously.

    • redneck_hippie

      I love it when heads explode.

      Then a couple of months later, plant another rumour, Palin/Romney.

      • Brian_Roastbeef

        That would really screw with people.

        • Brian Simpson

          Huckabee and President should only be mentioned in the context of a failed run in 2008.

        • SteveLA

          Throw Hucka Hucka from the train?

          or was it Under the Bus?

          Same difference.

    • chihank

      When Romney was promoting his book, reports asked him if Sarah was qualified to be President. Romney responded that she was qualified and that she is good for the party.

      After Palin addressed a Boston Tea Party group, she told the Boston Globe that she like to run a national ticket with Romney.

      So I don’t see any animostiy between the candidates themselves.

    • chihank

      When Romney was promoting his book, reports asked him if Sarah was qualified to be President. Romney responded that she was qualified and that she is good for the party.

      After Palin addressed a Boston Tea Party group, she told the Boston Globe that she like to run a national ticket with Romney.

      So I don’t see any animostiy between the candidates themselves.

  • jenniferjmilleresq

    I think rooting early for a primary candidate is great and that involves (warning, negativity coming) actual criticism of the opponents. If Romney’s aides voice their opinion, anonymously or not, contributors here have every right to say exactly what they think about Romney, especially facts about his governance (Romneycare). You yourself used the perjorative “Palinistas” and that doesn’t bother me, even though I think everyone’s kidding themselves if they don’t admit that she is the frontrunner, $$ or not.

    • Brian_Roastbeef

      What would you prefer to be called. Palinites?

      • jenniferjmilleresq

        I’m sorry I’ve elicited a tsk, tsk from you. You can use “Palinista” all you want, as far as I’m concerned. I think it identifies where you’re coming from.

        • Brian_Roastbeef

          Yeah, okay. I really never knew that “Palinista” is considered pejorative. If you don’t like Romney, go ahead. I’m not going to get into a Palin vs. Romney battle in the post below where I suggest not doing that.

          • jenniferjmilleresq

            http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=palinista
            It’s like “Paulbot” (which I definitely was not one of) and then NRO’s Robert Costa used it in a more neutral way in an article, but either way, it’s an attempt to brand her supporters as blindly devoted.

          • throwback59

            beats “Obamatons.”

  • jcincy

    I tried to read through this ‘serious’ Time Magazine piece… but kept getting distracted by the “See Pictures of Sarah Palin” after each paragraph. Is this really serious reporting?

    And like Brian RB above, I don’t put a lot of faith in anonymous sources, especially in liberal rags, like Time.

    • azaeroprof

      I haven’t seen the print version of Time magazine (geez, do they even still sell it?), but I would assume that this article has a number of Palin photos accompanying it in print, like most of their articles. Time online seems to avoid having a lot of photos appear, so they insert the occasional ‘click to see photos’ to keep bandwidth down on the main story. I would give Time the benefit of the doubt here as a print publication porting their stories to the web.

  • Bill S

    I look forward to the next installment of “What’s Inside Jeff’s Head?”

    :-)

    • knitwit

      Ditto that.

  • knitwit

    The Table of the Elements has only a limited supply of elements with enough available energy to harness them for reasonable use by human-kind. Liberals/progressives/eco-terrorists seem to miss this point in their pursuit of ‘alternative energy sources’, as their preferred alternatives degrade more land mass, use more energy and raw materials in production, and cause more environmental/interspecies damage than all the current carbon-based fuel extraction operations on the planet combined, and their final product costs exponentially more to purchase. Of course, most liberals don’t take chemistry or physics, either.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    this time around. People will be looking for new blood. I know I am.

  • red_baron

    I think in the 3 years I’ve been here I can count the number of “nice” things Jeff has said about Romney on one finger…..It would probably be the middle finger.

    That said the only two people who came out of this like adults are the potential candidates themselves. Palin did so because she hasn’t mentioned it. Romney tweeted in support of Palin and calling the anonymous “advisor” a numskull. This of courses matches every other statement he has made concerning Palin. You should know better than to trust anonymous sources when dealing with liberal rags. But I suppose as we see here and over at C4P, it is easier to bend or break the rules when dealing with people we don’t like.

    • Remington_Steele

      I have seen the same thing in my four years here. In fact the one person at RedState more dedicated to ridding the world of a Romney candidate is quoted by Jeff: Dan McLaughlin. Anyone remember Dan’s three part tome on how Romney stinks? Oh well.

      I know we’ll all express our frustrations with candidates, but wouldn’t it be nice if after November, we don’t cock the Desert Eagle and point it at our collective conservative foot?

      PS. yes I expect the barrage of how Romney is not a conservative (RomneyCare) and thus he should not be bundled in any conversations about those whose want conservative decision makers in power.

  • wannabeanncoulter

    I was really hoping that we’d wind up nuking the oil gusher …. maybe sometime around the Labor Day holiday (hurricanes permitting). Just imagine the drama! Oh well, maybe next time.

    As to Obama’s golf outings… Meh. Eisenhower played golf during World War II. There are some wonderful B&W photos of Ike in uniform, golf club in hand. While stationed in England, he always managed to have housing near some links. (He rarely if ever played a full round, but he always got a few holes in.) Here’s a classic photo of Eisenhower playing a few shots shortly before D-Day.

  • nvrepub

    That’s the winning ticket.

    • acat

      I’d say you’re turning into a trance mix, but I sure don’t want to dance to your fascination for those two …

      Mew

    • mbecker908

      I mean, the guy is a heck of a fiddle player and he’d be better than TheOne, but really…

      Well, maybe…

      • aesthete