« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Tragedy Strikes America’s Military and Special Operations Community

USAF Special Tactics Combat Control Pararescue US Navy Special Warfare SEALs US Army Aviation EOD

Bow your heads…

This weekend saw the deadliest day in the almost ten years of America’s war in Afghanistan, as well as the deadliest day in the history of the U.S. Navy’s Special Warfare community, when an Army CH-47 Chinook helicopter and crew carrying Navy SEALs and direct support personnel, Air Force combat controllers and pararescuemen, Afghan commandos and an interpreter went down in Wardak Province in eastern Afghanistan, apparently after being hit by a rocket-propelled grenade. The Associated Press is reporting that the helicopter carried an immediate reaction force that arrived on the scene to support an Army Ranger force that was engaged with the enemy on the ground, and that the crash happened during exfiltration after the fight had ended and the objective secured (ISAF has refuted this, saying that the chopper was shot down on ingress rather than on egress). As with last week’s New Yorker article on the bin Laden raid, people should only believe half at most of what they read or hear about this event and the circumstances surrounding it.

Naturally, the media – who pay attention to special operations once in the bluest of moons, and then proceed to get almost every detail wrong – are hyperventilating even more than usual about this tragedy because the helicopter was carrying operators from “SEAL Team Six,” more correctly known as the Navy Special Warfare Development Group, or “DEVGRU.”  They’re also quick to report that no operators lost in this tragedy were participants in the famous May 1 raid that killed Osama bin Laden, as if (1) the tragedy is any less because the operators were different individuals than those, (2) those who took part in the bin Laden raid should be granted immunity from peril and death in perpetuity, and (3) these two missions were the only time SEALs or any other special operators had ever encountered risk or gone outside the wire.  Points one and two are self-explanatorily ridiculous, while point three simply reinforces the drive-by nature of today’s media, and their pervasive attitude of treating anything that they didn’t find worthy of reporting at the time as though it never happened.

According to the AP, which cites a NATO source for the statistic, 2,832 special operations raids were carried out between April and July of this year alone.  Regardless of its precision, that number should provide a general idea of just how common and routine these missions are for special operations units whose bread and butter is direct action and counterterrorism operations.  In other words, just like high-value target (HVT) missions of the type that brought bin Laden to justice are daily occurrences for deployed special operators, so are the risks so horribly seen this weekend encountered on a daily and nightly basis for the entirety of military special operators’ careers. Over the course of ten years of special operations in Afghanistan, our enemies have had plenty of time to observe our tactics and to plan countermeasures. Conspiracy theories aside (such as the Admiral Ackbar-ish media claims that this was a “trap” set by Taliban), it’s entirely unsurprising that enemy fighters would have observed the routes used to infiltrate various sites and set up RPG-wielding fighters at points along them, hoping to catch a troop-carrying aircraft with a well-placed shot.

Additionally, helicopter crashes are far too common overall – let alone in the dangerous topographic and human terrain that make up Afghanistan – having claimed the lives of a significant number of crews and soldiers/sailors/airmen/Marines alike (I frequently say that I’ve lost more friends and former colleagues to helicopter crashes than to enemy fire, though this case appears to qualify as both). The eye-opening aspect of this incident is the sheer number of deaths, not the fact that a helicopter was apparently taken down while approaching what was evidently a hot LZ. It is interesting that the helicopter and crew were conventional, rather than from the 160 Special Operations Aviation Regiment that normally transports and supports Tier One special mission units, and the possibility – as yet unconfirmed – that the chopper and crew may have been from the Army National Guard raises further questions about the effect that an underpowered aircraft and a crew lacking experience in this type of direct action mission may have had on its tragic result. However, at this time this is simply an aspect of the case that bears watching and consideration; there is no evidence at this point that would support casting aspersions on chopper and crew for the tragedy that befell the military community as a whole this weekend. Evidently among the other augmentees on the mission were SEALs from one of the “white” Teams, which is not at all uncommon; the units the Air Force special operators came from have not been reported, though the 24th Special Tactics Squadron, which is incorporated into JSOC, usually provides the combat controllers and pararescuemen that operate as members of the command’s special mission units.

In their effort to conform to the scoop-outweighs-precision culture that our 24 hour media have created, numerous outlets ran to press and television without most (if any) facts about this incident. It took a full day for the public to have access to a narrative with any level of accuracy at all, an account by Navy Times reporter Sean D. Naylor which still stands as one of the best accounts available of the incident, albeit a brief and preliminary one.  The rest of the story will eventually come out, likely in bits and pieces over the course of days, weeks, and months, though it will as usual be augmented with heavy doses of media chattering and speculation, most of which comes from a place of total ignorance on the subject.

In the interest of not contributing to that cacophany of ignorant chatter, I won’t offer any other up front comment on his situation, though I’ll be happy to update this post in response to questions posted in the comments, provided (1) I know the answer, and (2) doing so doen’t violate OPSEC in any way. I’ve also been addressing some questions and issues on Twitter since Saturday.

JE

CH-47 Chinook helicopter preparing for a night Air Assault
CH-47 Chinook helicopter preparing for a night Air Assault in 2007. Photograph first published by Jeff Emanuel, September 3, 2007.

COMMENTS

  • freemanja1991

    Looks like they are paid well, with high gas prices they have the money to drive around while on strike. Plus they seem to have nice cars for the most part?

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

      nt

  • runner12

    It is a stark reminder of the price of freedom and the bravery of the men and women who choose to defend this country.

    While I understand the media is trying to do their job, all of the wild speculation and multiple false reports is really off-putting and seems insensitive to the fact that a tragedy occurred.

    • Scope

      You say the media is trying to do their job, while JE has made a great point that the reports that are coming out are not the facts of what actually happened on the ground. What media in particular are you referring to that has been trying to do their job? Wouldn’t it be responsible reporting if the media waited to get the real facts first, before reporting anything other than a major tragedy has occurred?

      • runner12

        sentence rather than taking into context the entire thought.

        My point was that I understand that out-scooping and being one step ahead of your competition is part of the news media business. The problem is that what began as a common sense business tactic has turned into a 24 hour media blitz. Few are concerned with facts or reporting truth for that matter. The journalism boat sailed a while back, with only a few left who are trying to bring it back.

        In this situation specifically, the false reports and speculation continue to expose the depths to which the news media has sunk. It also, as I stated earlier is extremely insensitive to the fact that a tragedy has occurred. It is as if ” being the first to get the scoop” trumps all human decency.

        I hope my explanation clears up any misconceptions you might have had :) .

        • Scope

          and you are correct that everyone wants to be first, no worries about accuracy. Then you have Joe O’Biden.

  • eugenio

    My prayers are with all the families and survivors. It makes me even sadder that we have no clear objective for victory anymore in Afghanistan. These men perform their duties so efficiently and with such precision to detail. They deserve a CIC who is focused on victory and does not use them to make himself look good. While I pray for their families, I will also pray that on January 20, 2013 that we have a real adult step as their new CIC.

  • fortcollins

    The tragic loss of so many underscores the high cost of liberty.

    Every time I see our flag, I think of the brave ones who daily place their very lives in harm’s way, purchasing for me the privilege of standing on free soil. They are owed an incalculable debt of gratitude. To serve and die in a faroff land, for the freedom of others whom they do not know, is a measure of devotion far beyond inadequate words.

    My family and I extend our heartfelt prayers for the families of those who gave their lives. May God grant them comfort and hope in the midst of heartache.

  • brah

    It just seems like such a big, not very agile piece of equipment to my untrained eye.

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

      If you need to move a lot of people by air, the Chinook is your bird. They’re operated throughout the Army, from conventional aviation units to the 160th SOAR(A) that traditionally supports special operations.

      • Ed54

        Chinooks have massive lift, a big operating advantage in High, Hot, and Dry environments like Afghanistan.

        • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

          …as you know, some are more powerful than others. Good to see you here again, by the way.

          • Ed54

            I’m not an aviator, so I don’t know all the particulars, and my experience was in Iraq so I don’t know the peculiarities of operations in the mountains of Afghanistan. I recall that MH’s are heavier because of avionics and weaponry, and wikipedia suggests that the MH series has the same engine as their CH base model, so it’s possible that the CH’s actually have an operational advantage in the mountains.

          • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

            http://nightstalkers.americanspecialops.com/helicopters/mh-47.php

            The MH-47G uses the CH-47 frame, but I believe it has more powerful engines than the conventional version. However, my Chinook experience (CH and MH) is limited to the back of the bird, not the flight deck, and I’m not an expert on their capabilities by any means.

          • Ed54

            Same here on experience: many hours sitting in the back of the flying bus, none driving. I did sit in the jump seat (between the pilots) once on an NVG flight on an MH-47E. We had a white-out landing in a tight, snowy LZ at about 9K elevation in Colorado. Scared the piss out of me.

            I work with a guy who is a retired TF160 commander. I will ask him on Weds and let you know via PM.

          • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

            Thanks.

          • http://lukos.com Ed54

            He says the G is more powerful than the Army standard D, but the same as the F upgrade which the Army is in the process of getting.

          • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

            Wow, the 101st was in the process of that upgrade (to the F) when I was at Ft. Campbell a decade ago.

  • annas

    My prayers,too, are with the families and survivors. It seems to me that it would have been appropriate for the President to have sent some condolences as well, or at least have mentioned the loss……….

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

      President Obama released a statement from Camp David the morning after the tragedy.

    • Ed54

      I’m sure the President is as saddened by this as anyone else not personally connected to those men. Remember he just met with members of that unit to thank them for the Bin Ladin raid. There is little chance that he does not understand the exceptional nature of the men who died, or feel the personal burden of responsibility as the Commander in Chief. As patriots, we should respect the office.

  • GreyCloak

    to our brave men (and sometimes women) and their families. We have relatives on some of those crews.

    The “Jolly Green Giant” (Chinook) is great transport when many troops have to be moved, but it is also a big target.

    Media will say what they want. Unfortunately, an RPG can take out a Scout or a Transport or just some soldier walking in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Please blame the **[insert word here]** that fired on our troops … may he soon welcome a Hellfire (AGM-114x) missile with his open arms.

    Be they Regular Army, Reserves, or Ops forces, no helicopter crew are going to do less than their best. They died, too.

  • bcochran1981

    somewhere that “helicopter crash in eastern afghanistan” was a euphemism/cover story for deaths during SPECFOR missions. This appears to be both. Not trying to be insensitive at all, just curious, but there was an actual crash right? This wasn’t just a mission gone really bad?

    Thoughts and prayers to all those families touched by this. Respect and honor to those that gave their lives.

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

      Would you mind clarifying?

      • bcochran1981

        There’s, as you noted, a ton of info out there. Most of it likely wrong. Is there confirmation of an actual helicopter crash? Or is this a case of a SPECFOR mission gone really, really wrong?

        • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

          …the two. Yes, there was a helicopter crash; and yes, I think you could define losing 38 people as a mission “gone really, really wrong,” though the obvious follow up question is whether or not they accomplished their mission.

  • Ed54

    are usually wrong to some degree. Remember the initial leaked stories of the Bin Ladin raid described a fierce battle. We later learned that only 2 or 3 middle aged couriers resisted, no match for an assault troop of SEALs. So perhaps it’s a bit of a futile exercise to spend too much effort analyzing the early reports.

    Having said that, two parts of the Naylor story caught my attention. The first was the use of a CH-47 rather than an MH-47. It is not unusual for non-SOF aviation units to provide support to SOF. However, typically those platforms are used for admin and logistics lifts, with the SOF birds used for actual tactical assault roles. There are several plausible explanations. Most likely they are relying more on Chinooks because of their increased lift capacity at high altitude, and they need more platforms than TF160 can provide on a sustainable rotation basis.

    The second is the use of DevGru guys as a QRF/IRF for a ranger operation. That is the reverse of the typical roles for these organizations. Again, there are several plausible explanations, and it’s pointless to speculate without knowing the particulars of the tactical and organizational situation that led to that decision. But it does reinforce the notion of a potential shortfall of deployed operational resources to meet the current operational tempo.

    This is a political site, so it’s unavoidable to draw some political or policy lessons from this tragedy. This incident dramatically illustrates the folly in Biden’s proposed alternative to the surge two years ago. Democrats love “surgical” SOF operations because they offer the prospect of military success without all the dirty, dangerous downsides of full scale war. They see SOF as a silver bullet: the problem magically goes away, without hurting anyone but the bad guys. But as this operation illustrates, SOF inherently operate at the margins of operational viability, with little tolerance for mistakes, and when things go wrong they can go very wrong. Further, for long term sustainable ops, SOF rely on the infrastructure and backup provided by conventional forces in the same battlespace. A strategy consisting of ceding the country to the enemy and trying to hold the leaders at bay with targeted SOF raids would likely result in multiple incidents like this crash and the “Blackhawk Down” incident in Mogadishu, causing enormous damage to our SOF capability.

    It’s tricky to claim that the death of one soldier is more significant than another, but these guys really were the most exceptional of men. Our troops are all heroes, but even among them the SEALs are extraordinary men, and these guys were the hand-picked best of the SEALs, men who have excelled in the most demanding profession on earth. It is as if we had lost our entire Olympic team and all our Nobel prize winners in one plane crash. I hope that OPSEC considerations do not stop the country from getting to know the personal stories behind each of these men, so that we can fully appreciate their incredible pursuit of excellence in life.

    • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

      …the two that stand out most to me are (a) the apparent use of an Army National Guard helicopter and crew, and (b) the use of DEVGRU assets as the IRF for a Ranger element engaged on the ground. The latter has been blown out of proportion by ignorant media and chattering heads, but it’s a detail that’s worth paying attention to as more information becomes available.

      • Ed54

        Denver Post reports that the co-pilot was from the Colorado Guard. I worked with Colorado ANG helo pilots from Eagle Airport (near Vail) back in the late 90′s. They were considered some of the best pilots in the Army, and were noted experts in high altitude helo flying. The Guard chinooks in Colorado support a lot of high angle search and rescue missions and firefighting. It is possible that the aircrew was specifically selected for their experience in mountain flying.

  • rightwingmom52

    Aaron Vaughn was from Union City, Tennessee. He left behind a wife and two young children. His widow asks that we remember all who died, and she and his parents speak from the heart about Aaron’s love of God, family and this country. It’s about 7 minutes long, but is almost all the family talking (very little of Matt Lauer), and is definitely a tribute to the entire SEAL team.

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    • rightwingmom52

      Here’s a link.

      http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44056945/ns/today-today_people/t/navy-seals-widow-we-were-blessed-be-together/

  • 2warabnvet

    revolution turns into a fiasco, will Obama take credit for that also?