President Obama’s latest clarification-inducing comment came Wednesday, and it’s eyebrow-raising to say the least. Speaking on employment and the economy, the silver-tongued presidentdeclared, “Just like we’ve tried [the Republicans’] plan, we’ve tried our plan, and it worked. That’s the difference.”
Moe, who has graphically shown the fallacy of Obama’s “it worked” claim, summed up his rebuttal by declaring that “the only way that you can possibly justify suggesting that Obama’s economic program ‘worked’ is if you define ‘not working’ as ‘the country is now on fire’.”
Given this obvious state of affairs, Democrats, media, and apologists (but I repeat myself) have once again entered full-on spin-and-clarification mode, claiming (yet again) that their skilled orator and effective communicator in chief has been taken out of context, and that he was actually referring to something else, like the economic policies of President Clinton and his Republican Congress. Of course, a look at the transcript – combined with Obama’s penchant for taking credit for policy successes where (to put it charitably) none is due, makes this claim unlikely at best.
Being out of touch and making outlandish claims about his own policies’ effectiveness is nothing new for Obama, of course. We all recall “the private sector is doing fine” and if you like your doctor or health care plan, you can keep it.” Further, the condescending, exasperated tone he strikes with the “it worked” comment is similar to his 2010 comments about tax day rallies, in which he said, “I’ve been a little amused over the last couple of days where people have been havin’ these rallies about ‘taxes,’ ‘taxes,'” and famously declared, “you would think they would be saying ‘Thank You!'”
Perhaps the president really thinks his “plan” – trillions in new debt, almost-double-digit unemployment, massive new taxes, and hundreds of billions trillions in wasted “stimulus” dollars Renminbi – “worked.” Perhaps he just thinks repeating ridiculous things will fool the commoners into voting for him.
Perhaps, in the end, he just needs to go. Maybe as a parting gift, he can take an iPod pre-loaded with his own speeches to watch. After all, he’s already demonstrated a belief that that’s a gift fit for royalty.
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES MoveOn.org. Code Pink. International ANSWER. Congressman Pete Stark. You might be forgiven for thinking any of those were on the stage last night at the GOP Debate when, in his frenzied and repeated attempts to destroy Jeb, Donald Trump went 9/11 troof about George W. Bush. First, he goes after the war, the intel, the WMDs, and basically the | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES Look, this isn’t a political discussion. It’s an aesthetic one. I will be called petty here, but this needs to be addressed: It was ill-advised for Donald Trump to re-apply a spray tan so close to a debate where he would be standing in front of a red background. He looked like John Boehner blushing. Look at that. LOOK | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES Inbetween a number of nasty (and at this point tiresome) exchanges between Cruz and Rubio, one guy on the stage stood calm and collected in the face of constant attacks and immature interruptions from Donald Trump. Apart from one criticism of Kasich on Medicaid expansion, Bush stayed focused on the prize, and came out the clear winner. Unlike the | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES This was amazing. John Dickerson is supposed to be the debate moderator and instead he starts getting into a debate with Ted Cruz regarding the appointment of Supreme Court justices during an election year. Cruz rightly pointed out it’s been precedent for 80 years not to do this. Dickerson then started arguing with Cruz about when Justice Anthony Kennedy | Read More »