« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

51 Million Reasons to End Federal Funded Abortions

Promoted from the diaries by Ben Howe

Pro-life activists exposed systemic abuses at Planned Parenthood. The media was outraged.

In Planned Parenthood offices all over America, activists pretending to be a pimp and an underage girl taped employees giving them advice on obtaining illegal abortions so they could get back into the sex trade as quickly as possible without running afoul of the law.

This exposure of prohibited practices inevitably helped in the February 18 vote in the U.S. House of Representatives to end federal funding of Planned Parenthood.

(Abortion prices will necessarily skyrocket)!

The lament of the media? How could conservatives want women and children to die?

Even though Planned Parenthood was the bad actor (and admitted as much by firing some of the employees caught on tape) the media’s pro-Roe bias had already begun.

One Huffington Post headline cried, “A War on Women.” (Oh no)!

The always objective Politico reported the defunding bill, “Mike Pence’s War on Planned Parenthood.” (Bombs away)!

Similarly, The Seattle Times proclaims, “Republicans Focus Attack on Planned Parenthood.”

Indeed, the American left holds few things in such high esteem as a women¹s “right” to “choose.” What is getting harder to defend is why taxpayers should foot the bill.

In fact, a 2009 Gallup Poll found that 51 percent of Americans self-identify themselves as pro-life. Again, it begs the question why more than half the country should have to subsidize a life-ending procedure they morally oppose and has already caused the deaths of 51 million unborn babies?


While some argue shutting off the taxpayer spigot to Planned Parenthood will reduce funding for counseling services, HIV testing and other reproductive health and family planning services, abortion services are there real business.

To be clear, in 1997, Planned Parenthood, according to their own fact sheet, they received $165 million from taxpayers and performed 165,174 abortions. They performed 305,310 in 2007 and received $363 million.

Noticing a pattern yet?

As taxpayer funding increased, so did the number of these abhorrent procedures.

In contrast, according to Planned Parenthood figures cited by Representative Pence and Tony Perkins in a Daily Caller commentary, the number of prenatal clients served by Planned Parenthood was less than 0.09 percent of the total services they provided in 2008. Pregnant women seeking help from Planned Parenthood were 27 times more likely to receive an abortion than receive prenatal care or be referred to an adoption service.

LifeNews.com reports Planned Parenthood performs 134 abortions for every adoption referral.

More appalling, Thatsabortion.com says 70 percent of these abortion factories are concentrated in minority neighborhoods. While black child-bearing women make up a just 3 percent of America, they comprise a heartbreaking 30 percent of abortions. Hispanic women make up a similarly disproportionate 25 percent.

It smacks of racial population control. This notion rings true considering that eugenicist Fredrick Osborn proclaimed in 1971 that “birth control and abortion are proving to be the great eugenics advances of our time.”

It seems that, just as blacks began to escape the preverbal seat at the back of the bus, a new obstacle awaits at a Planned Parenthood facility.

It’s the new civil rights issue of our time. As former governor Mike Huckabee says, the “Abortion issue trumps all.”

Meanwhile, NOW, the NAACP and The National Council of La Raza and others are not surprisingly siding with Planned Parenthood. It seems these people intend to ignore what makes sense morally to fight for what gains power politically.

It is mindboggling to no end that these self-proclaimed purveyors of unremitting compassion are instead the biggest defenders of publicly-funded abortion on demand.

Our nation is already deep in a financial abyss. In addition to our fiscal bankruptcy, must we turn a blind eye to the daily destruction of human life and become morally bankrupt as well?

* * *

Jerome Hudson is a member of Project 21 a sponsorship of the National Center for Public Policy Research. He is the editor of OurLastStand.com and can be reached at Jeromehudsonspeaks.com.

COMMENTS

  • EagleWatcher

    Glenn Beck had the pro-life investigator who exposed Planned-Parenthood on his show and made an impassioned plea to women considering an abortion to consider offering them for adoption.

    Beck’s son was born to a 14-year-old and was later adopted by Beck and his wife.

    http://www.therightscoop.com/glenn-beck-show-feb-18-2011

    • rightwingmom52
      • audax

        These Republicans voted no: Charlie Bass (NH), Judy Biggert (IL), Mary Bono Mack (CA), Charlie Dent (PA), Robert Dold (IL), Rodney Frelinghuysen (NJ), Richard Hanna (NY). Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) voted present.

        • audax
      • jeffreywturner

        It is because of the advent of the sonigram and the ability of recent generations to SEE what it is that they are “terminating” that is causing the tide of American sentiment to turn on the abortion issue.

        I wish I could say it was because of the Country as a whole is making a turn back toward Christian values, but alas that does not seem to be the case. Either way, I will not look the gift horse in the mouth. Anything that causes America to see the error of her ways on this issue is a net plus in my book.

        • itrytobenice

          • SoFiMil

            Keeping it modern.
            Did he tweet this to his friend?

          • SoFiMil

            Reply was a response to your TobyToom caption.

          • itrytobenice

            I’m just a wild and crazy guy!

            Oh, wait. That’s not modern, is it?

            But thx.

          • drewk

            I think you’ve got the arrow of causation wrong when it comes to abortions in minority communities. It isn’t the supply of abortion providers creating demand for more abortions; the demand is already there, due to disproportionate levels of unwanted pregnancy and a weaker support network for those who choose to complete the pregnancy. Planned Parenthood is simply locating facilities where they are in demand.

            Similarly, PP’s emphasis on abortion over other options isn’t an ideologically-driven attempt to turn us into an abortion-crazy society. They are simply responding to increasing demand in a marketplace where abortion services are for a variety of reasons undersupplied. In many communities PP is the only option for girls and women who want options. It makes sense that this scarcity would result in the clustering of abortions, with other services diminishing in relation.

            Lastly, you are entitled to your beliefs about Planned Parenthood and about abortion. I have no doubts that they are sincere. But it’s unfair for you to impugn the sincerity of NOW, La Raza, and the NAACP on the matter. Clearly they aren’t “ignoring what makes sense morally” to obtain political power. Their moral compass may be pointing in a direction here, but clearly they aren’t ignoring it. Defunding PP is not only severely regressive, but it levies a disproportionate economic burden on women and minorities. It’s not hard to see why groups that advocate for equality and empowerment for these groups would oppose defunding PP.

          • lineholder

            Keep the federal government out of it. Keep PP “educational” programs out of the schools, which are also federally funded, by the way, not privately-funded.

            Don’t make those of us who don’t believe abortion to be right pay for someone else to kill their child.

          • rightwingmom52

            NOW, La Raza and NAACP because of their track record of only standing up for liberal women. Did they condemn those who wrote vile things about Christine O’Donnell & Sharron Angle? Have they condemned the guy advocating gangbanging of tea partiers? You can link to the the sign here.

            http://hillbuzz.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/wpid-downloadfile-32.jpg

            How about their endorsement of Jerry Brown after he called Meg Whitman a whore? The relentless nasty attacks on Sarah Palin. Heard about the FB page advocating her death with the vile distorted pictures of her Down’s Syndrome child?

            There are years upon years worth of examples where they do not support women’s rights because their left-wing ideology trumps over everything else. Sorry, but I’m not buying what they’re selling.

            Finally, we hear a lot of noise about how the pro choice supporters want to reduce abortions as much as anyone. That’s just a lie. Otherwise, they would support at a minimum some common sense restrictions like parent notification for minors and ban on partial birth abortions. They would also make sure that abortion clinics are as regulated as they want everything else to be. A pro choice position is pro abortion and to think otherwise is just trying to cover a guilty conscience. I suggest you read the brilliant article by Robert George linked below.

            http://townhall.com/columnists/robertgeorge/2008/10/15/obamas_abortion_extremism

          • jerry39

            Supply and demand is certainly an issue, but here is the real supply and demand issue. Abortion still costs around $300-$400 nationwide at PP’s. A little more if your a lot pregnant. Same as it cost it in the early 70′s when abortion first became legal. Even the most minor of surgeries cost 3-5 times that amount otherwise. Why is the price so low – becuase women will have their babies and give them up for adoption or keep them if you raise the price any higher. PP keeps demand high by keeping supply cheap. And yes, they market abortion. 324,000 abortions in 08 and less than 10,000 adoption referalls. Are you kidding me?

  • sertelt

    Not to be picky, but there have been 53 million abortions since Roe, not 51.

    http://www.lifenews.com/2010/11/26/nat-6891/

    • Adjoran

      The far left now dominates the Democratic Party, so when they regained power in 2007 and 2009 the long-standing policies were overturned – but they had never been enough.

      It was a joke to prohibit federal money being used for abortions and simultaneously fund organizations like PP. Money is fungible; you can’t say this money or that money funded the copier budget and paid rent, while some other money was used for the abortions.

      Cutting them off completely was always the only answer.

  • Getting_Back_to_Basics

    The actions both historical and current of Planned Parenthood are deplorable and a shame on the country, and I am not in the least unhappy that the House voted to defund this organization. However, I do have a problem with a piece of legislation which names a specific person or entity as the House bill today did. That is not a good precedent and there is a danger that the measure (should it be passed by the Senate) could be declared unconstitutional. The law should apply equally and not single out specific individuals or organizations. Congress should defund every abortion provider in the country, not just Planned Parenthood.

  • nick2000

    The best way to prevent abortions is simply to avoid unwanted pregnancies. The typical “if you don’t want the kid, don’t have sex” is easy said but does not seem to resonate very well with our kids. Note that Planned Parenthood was ding this too, so we will need to use another conduit for this that will need to be carefully veto’ed.

    Dropping pregnancy prevention programs will only lead us back to back-alley abortions so we have to be careful about not putting on blinders and face reality.

    • rightwingmom52

      it probably means we’re doing something right. If you haven’t read heartlander’s post and the comments, it’s great reading and speaks to this issue.

      See http://www.redstate.com/heartlander/2011/01/25/who-the-gets-an-abortion-when-theyre-7-months-pregnant/#comment-183.

      • nick2000

        I was not saying that abortions do not resonate with our kids. Maybe I was not very clear.

        How do we basically get the rate of unwanted pregnancies down?

        Abstinence obviously does not work so there must be something missing in the message.

        • jerry39

          Cant pull the stats now, but unwanted pregnancies went down every year of the absitinence only push accross America. We have of course gotten away from that a little already with BO supporting Planned Parenthood’s “age appropriate sex education” so they can prmote their abortion services to 5 year olds. But the abstinence programs were working.

          • nick2000

            According to this report (http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf), abstinence only accounts for about %25 of lowered teenage pregnancy rates. In addition, if you look at this report (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db46.pdf) you will see that states that favor abstinence only show much higher teenage pregnancies rate. But then, maybe those were actually wanted (note also that the teenage marriages are also going down).

            Short summary is that abstinence without education yields a rise in teenage pregnancies (Because you cannot keep everybody from their urges?).

  • chitan

    End federally funded abortions? There are no federally funded abortions. It’s called the Hyde Amendment, and it’s been in effect since 1976. The Title X funds than Planned Parenthood receives go to contraceptives, counseling, and exams.

    • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister
    • lineholder

      There is no means currently in place that separates them. If PP had wanted to protect themselves legally on this point, they could have done it long ago by separating the financial accounts.

      But they saw no need to do this at the time, because who would ever check up on it, right?

    • jerry39

      It’s alwasy funny to see a llort come on here and throw out a media talking point, not realizing that peple can actually respond on RS. I think if every member of the media were forced to blog their spin before using it on the public, they would quickly see how ignorant they really look.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    …to pimps trafficking underage prostitutes….

    • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister
  • Pingback: read more

  • Pingback: A summary of Planned Parenthood’s frauds and felonies in the service of ideology