« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Four Reporters Ejected from Gitmo Hearing after Revealing Name of Protected Witness

The real travesty here is not that the press disclosed the identity of a protected witness. It is that their delicate sensibilities were offended more by non-physical, non-threatening interrogation techniques than the torture-worthy murder of an American soldier.

Four journalists were ejected from a military commission pre-trial hearing for alleged terrorist and Guantanamo Bay detainee Omar Khadr after reporting the name of a protected witness and one-time interrogator, the Pentagon acknowledged Thursday.

“We threw some people out there today because they disclosed the identity of a protected witness,” said Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell. “He had been clearly identified as someone who needed to be protected. These newspapers identified him by name.”

Khadr, a Canadian citizen who was taken into American custody at age 15 in Afghanistan, is accused of murdering U.S. Army Sergeant First Class Christopher Speer, whom the Pentagon said died from a hand grenade. Khadr’s attorneys contend he was the victim of abuse while in government custody, a claim for which they called a former military interrogator to bolster.

The witness, whose identity was concealed and identified for purposes of the commission only as “Interrogator No. 1,” recounted a technique he used in 2002 on Khadr. Interrogators, the witness said, told Khadr a “fictitious” tale of a convicted Afghan youth gang-raped “by a bunch of big black guys and big Nazis” in an American prison.

Aghast and perhaps enraged at Interrogator No. 1′s testimony, the press ignored Pentagon protocol mandating that those witnesses awarded a protective order cannot be named in press accounts. Those reporters who disregarded that ground rule were: Carol Rosenberg of McClatchy Newspapers, Paul Koring of the Globe and Mail, Steven Edwards of Canwest Newspapers and Michelle Spephard of the Toronto Star.

Reviewing the day’s events with a gaggle of reporters, the military’s chief prosecutor Navy Captain John Murphy said the protective order was a necessity and that the press been awarded an “extraordinary” degree of access.

“You see so much,” he said. “Our position is, and I hope it would be given a lot of thought, that publishing entities carries some risk and the judge recognizes that risk when he issues these protective orders.”

An hour later, the left-leaning Washington Independent’s Spencer Ackerman reports, four journos received word from Pentagon brass they had been barred from base, and would no longer be permitted to cover the proceedings on-site.

Khadr’s team of civilian defense attorneys insists his 2002 testimony was coerced by threats of rape and even death.

But Khadr’s case is not one in which a frightened, innocent boy submits to the demands of ruthless military interrogators; he was a trained, active operative of a known terrorist organization who sought and achieved the deaths of Americans. The boy-soldier only alleged abuse when it expedient and apparent he would not be released.

“These statements weren’t wrestled from Omar Khadr,” said Jeff Groharing, a member of the prosecution team, at the outset of the pre-trial two weeks ago. “He talked openly, confidently and comfortably about his knowledge of al-Qaeda.”

The facts:

  • At age ten, Khadr was relocated by his father, an al-Qaeda sympathizer, from Canada to Afghanistan. There, Khadr became the object of indoctrination by the local Muslim extremist apparatus.
  • Despite his age at the time of arrest, the Canadian government has to-date rebuffed calls for Khadr’s extradition or repatriation.
  • According to Department of Defense records, in 2002 Khadr trained for one month under the direction of al-Qaeda operative Abu Haddi in “the use of rocket propelled grenades, rifles, pistols, hand grenades, and explosives.” (You’ll remember it was a hand grenade that killed Sgt. Speer.)
  • That same year, Khadr and a group of Al Qaeda operatives converted land mines to improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, which they buried in the hopes military vehicles would trigger detonation. (According to the DoD, IEDs are the number one cause of death and injury among allied forces in Afghanistan. It was recently reported the number of IED-related injuries and deaths doubled in the past year, from 249 in March 2009 to 989 in March 2010.)
  • On the day of his apprehension, Khadr and associates engaged coalition military forces, resulting in the deaths of two Afghan militiamen. A small-arms fight erupted and American forces intervened, entering the compound from which Khadr was operating. Upon entry, Khadr “threw and/or fired grenades at nearby coalition forces,” which injured many and killed Sgt. Speer.

The real travesty here is not that the press disclosed the identity of a protected witness. It is that their delicate sensibilities were offended more by non-physical, non-threatening interrogation techniques than the torture-worthy murder of an American soldier.

Khadr’s trial is the first major military tribunal for a Guantanamo detainee since President Barack Obama assumed office and is a rehearsal of sorts for his administration.

Follow James on Twitter.

Cross-posted to Skepticians.com.

COMMENTS

  • jcincy

    There is no excuse for the reporters reckless, stupidity and disregard for the safety of these witnesses..

    This nonsense must have consequences. The media does not have a first amendment right to jeopardize the life and liberty of these witnesses.

    Lock them up indefinitely and then try the reporters for treason. Hold the papers accountable for these acts of treason as well.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      What a low-life piece of crap.

      • SteveLA

        The papers from which these pieces of human excrement work for; BANNED from all US government press events, all access to the news they seek to cover revoked. If these clowns are Canadian, revoke their right to be in this country. Until these idiots are punished, cut them off from the folks they see to cover, across the news organization they work for.

        This is not a First Amendment issue, the protective orders were issued by a judge, let these companies rot until these reporters are suspended for a good long time.

        • GregInFla

          amendment rights here for them. They are guests.

          • smagar
          • edintexas

            GreginFla said that as Canadian citizens the Canadian alleged reporters have no 1st Amendment rights in the US. I’m sure the Administration would disagree (if terrorists not physically in the US have 4th Amendment rights, etc.). He was not taking the side of the alleged reporters.

          • GregInFla

            Been on vacation. Yes, like all foreigners, these Canadian journalists can simply be sent home. They do not have a right to be here.

        • Flagstaff

          Maybe by the military, but Obama probably has gold-plated White House Press Corps passes ready for them when they’re re-assigned to DC.

      • smagar
        • E Pluribus Unum

          We would have a hard time inflicting all that much damage on the Globe and Mail, Canwest Newspapers, and the Toronto Star.

          But we (conservatives, Tea Party activists, middle Americans) can make McClatchy pay severely.

          • ceili_dancer

            During the ongoing saga of Don’t Leave it to Cleaver pts. number up to 14 now.

  • Raven

    I’ll kick in a few (hundred) to his legal fund for going after these reporters’ entire net value and ownership of their employers’ companies.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      Since those vermin have made this an us vs them thing, so be it.

    • Alberta

      Setting up a fund so we can litigate the pests. Ideally, just lawsuit after lawsuit, the papers have no money anyways they will cave.

      Also, as a Canadian, Khadr is scum, his family is scum who have been living off the taxpayers up here for years, and I hope, not to be too blunt, that he has a stroke and dies.

      Did they not used to shoot rabid dogs? Now they get to go to court. Unreal.

  • http://itsaboutfreedom.proboards.com Conservative Phantom

    …these reporters have all insulted islam and mohammed, that they flush the koran down the toilet daily, etc.

    Then let them deal with being “outed.”

  • JamesLBurns

    So how to protest until the reporters are fired? Boycott advertisers?

    • E Pluribus Unum

      I favor much more personal means of influence.

      They outed a soldier doing his duty. I say we publish names, addresses and photos of the front driveway of all significant McClatchy bigwigs.

      That’s phase 1. Then escalate as needed. Tell them the b*tch gets fired, or the next-highest up people will get the same treatment. Then publish photos of them at the grocery store, bank, mall, and the front door of their workplace. Their car at the workplace.

      • dudette

        and I am going to send it over to Hillbuzz….

  • http://www.laborunionreport.combrand/brhttp://www.laborunionreport.blogspot.com LaborUnionReport
  • klondike

    “… publishing entities carries some risk …”

    Quite an understatement, counselor. It carries a great deal of risk. Just ask Nick Rowe. Oops, you can’t – he’s DEAD, murdered, thanks to leftists revealing his identity.

  • smagar

    THIS is the kind of news item that the conservative New Media needs to be trumpeting.

    Americans have a very, very low opinion of the MSM.

    Now, we have one of the MSM’s own deliberately putting at risk an American soldie, and his family and friendr—even after she had been explicitly told NOT to do so.

    What did the interrogator do that was so vicious that it warranted putting him—and his family and friends—at risk?

    Interrogators, the witness said, told Khadr a ?fictitious? tale of a convicted Afghan youth gang-raped ?by a bunch of big black guys and big Nazis? in an American prison.

    He told the prisoner a ficticious tale.

    He didn’t waterboard him. Or beat him. Or starve him.

    He SCARED him.

    And, for that, McClatchy and several Canadian newspapers decided that the interrogator—and his family and friends—-deserved to be imperiled for doing his duty. That duty was—gathering info that keeps the rest of us safe.

    I suppose that, in McClatchy and the Canadian newspapers’ minds, the soldier—-and his family and friends—have it coming.

    Well, who says THEY get to make those kinds of decisions.

    John Hinderaker, please read celi dancer’s comment upthread. Please add this to your discussion with McClatchy.

  • romeg

    “Necessity Defense” which she and co-defendant Abbie Hoffman used, successfully, when she was prosecuted for some of her crimes while a student at Brown University.

    These sanctimonious “journalists” somehow think that it is their “duty” to violate the law and endanger the lives of those who actually DO make a difference in the world and in the lives of people in desperate situations. They are beyond pathetic in their self-indulgence and hypocrisy.

    The, presumably, entered J school so that they could make a difference. Here’s an idea: Go join the U.S., Canadian, British or Australian military where you actually CAN make a difference. The worst that can happen to you is that you will get over your infantile self-centered view of the world.

  • johnt

    they like to put it. To be expected, they are aligned more closely with islamic murderers than America. You see, they know, they just know, that America & everybody who isn’t a leftist is evil.
    What poetic justice it would be if some intrepid soul could post their home addresses online. Then sit back & listen to the vermin squeal about privacy.

  • trilogy

    This is one of many reasons why Obama and Holder should not hold a Civil Trial in NYC or anywhere else for KSM. The press would have a field day with exposing many many secrets and people who are not suppose to be mentioned on a daily basis.

  • http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish/ reelman

    KAGAN: KEY COMMENTS TODAY
    The latest kook appointment by Obama?some comments floating about today, May 10, 2010.
    NOTES ON ELENA KAGAN FROM POWERLINE
    She has no judging experience.
    She has little experience as a practicing lawyer.
    She has approximately one year of experience as Solicitor General of the United States.
    She has lots of experience in academia, but has published only a small amount of scholarly work, none of which seems particularly noteworthy.
    As the dean of Harvard Law School, she was tolerant of conservative law professors, but not of the United States military
    ===
    Kagan has clerked for Thurgood Marshall, worked for Bill Clinton and earned a stellar reputation as a student, teacher and manager of the elite academic world. Yet she would be the first justice without judicial experience in almost 40 years.
    Kagan, who is unmarried, was born in New York City. She holds a bachelor?s degree from Princeton, a master?s degree from Oxford and a law degree from Harvard.
    Before she served as a clerk for Justice Marshall, she clerked for federal Appeals Court Judge Abner Mikva, who later became an important political mentor to Obama in Chicago.
    Kagan and Obama both taught at the University of Chicago Law School in the early 1990s.
    In her current job, Kagan represents the U.S. government and defends acts of Congress before the Supreme Court and decides when to appeal lower court rulings.
    Associated Press writers Natasha T. Metzler, Tom Raum and David Espo contributed to this story.
    She banned the military because of Don?t ask policy?what does that tell you?
    She also worked for Goldman-Sachs. What does that tell you?
    Does this sound like a clone of Obama? It should because she is in many frightening ways.
    http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish