« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Colorado Democrat Says Women Can’t Be Trusted With Guns, Backers Fail To Rebuke

While debating a bill on the Colorado house floor that would ban all firearms from Colorado university campuses, freshman lawmaker Joe Salazar (D-Thorton) suggested female college students should not have guns because they may shoot a non-rapist due to an irrational fear of being raped. In his remarks in favor of the campus gun ban, Salazar noted that women on college campuses have other methods of protection against assault, including call boxes and whistles.

“And you don’t know if you feel like you’re gonna be raped, or if you feel like someone’s been following you around or if you feel like you’re in trouble when you may actually not be, that you pop out that gun and you pop… pop a round at somebody,” Salazar said, indicating he believes young women should not have the right to self defense with a firearm because they may make careless decisions when they fear being sexually assaulted.

Only after the media caught on to Salazar’s off-putting comments on women and rape did he issue a statement responding to the criticism. He did not apologize for the comments themselves, but said he was sorry if his comments “offended anyone”.

Salazar then resorted to racial stereotypes to describe the image he believed critics of his remarks were painting of him, saying he isn’t a “boorish, macho, Neanderthal Latino.”

Rep. Mark Ferrandino, the newly elected Speaker of the Colorado House, issued a statement late Monday evening that defended Salazar on all points. Ferrandino’s staff claimed the reason for the delay was due to the fact that the Speaker was at home, sick. Ferrandino insisted Salazar’s comments were taken “out of context” and that what Salazar actually meant when he spoke of call boxes, whistles, and imaginary rape was that allowing firearms on college campuses would not reduce violence or protect students.

However, recently reported data show a sharp downward trend in forcible and non-forcible sex offenses at Colorado State University beginning in 2003 — the same year the university agreed to allow the concealed carry of properly permitted handguns on its campuses.

Salazar also sat on the committee that voted down Jessica’s Law in Colorado last week, a measure designed to protect potential victims of violent sex crimes or those in imminent danger and to help prevent future offenses by sex offenders. Salazar cast his vote against the bill along with the other six Democrats on the committee.

Over the course of his campaign in the the 2012 election cycle, Joe Salazar received funding from a diverse range of fellow Democrats, labor unions, and other liberal organizations.

Over a dozen different union groups threw their support behind Salazar, accounting for his campaign’s top donations, along with diversity groups such as One Colorado and Colorado WINS.

Salazar’s 2012 campaign chest also included large financial contributions from the Mark Ferrandino Leadership Fund, Jared Polis, Pat Stryker, and other current lawmakers. Federico Pena, a venture capitalist and co-chair for Obama’s reelection campaign, maxed out his legal limit for personal donations to Salazar. Pena’s wife and other family members also contributed after Federico had given the maximum permitted under law.

Of all of these individuals and groups, not one has publicly rebuked or criticized Rep. Joe Salazar for any of his misogynistic comments.

Below is a statement from Colorado Women’s Alliance Director, Debbie Brown:

“Representative Salazar’s comments trivializing the danger of women on college campuses as emotionally speculative as reason to restrict their ability to protect themselves is laughable. Tips like use a ballpoint pen, or pee on yourself to detract a would-be rapist, give all the power to the rapist. Competent, trained women should have the ability to defend themselves, not just because they may have a ‘fear’ of getting raped, but because they face very real dangers.

Further, Speaker Ferrandino’s defense of Rep. Joe Salazar’s extreme comments about women’s inability to act rationally when they feel threatened is offensive to women everywhere. Women have the ability to assess a threat and act to protect themselves from bodily harm. Colorado’s women deserve better than a House Speaker who doubles down on offensive comments and a Representative who undermines women’s ability to protect themselves from danger.

Colorado Women’s Alliance calls on both representative Salazar and Speaker Ferrandino to apologize for their offensive comments.”

About Colorado Women’s Alliance

Colorado Women’s Alliance supports research, education, and advocacy in areas of concern to women voters. The organization views the common concerns among all women as providing high-quality education to all children, protecting seniors, creating economic vitality, preserving safety and quality of life, and providing affordable health care. In addition to creating alliances and coalitions among women, Colorado Women’s Alliance will promote and educate women on issues and candidates, and conduct ongoing research on the values and concerns of women.

This post was orginially featured at Media Trackers Colorado.

COMMENTS

  • capeconservative

    I cant believe how dramatically Colorado has changed since we moved away 15 years ago! What used to be is no more! To have the legislative leader give his blessing to such an offensive comment saddens me greatly. Ladies, stand up for your right to protect yourself and let the legislators ‘blow their own whistles’ to protect themselves! Let them learn that simply because we are women does NOT mean we lack common sense. After reading this, I believe there is a TOTAL absence of common sense in the state capitol…especially if the governor goes along with such foolishness!

    • clowngirl

      It’s also absurd that this passes for serious discourse.

      Guns on college campuses isn’t some untested theory – they have been allowed for some time and there is no evidence to support the notion that young women will suddenly start “popping” innocent young men who just happen to be walking behind them. Yet this is treated as something we’re supposed to discuss with a straight face?

  • clowngirl

    First off, kudos to the Colorado Women’s Alliance for actually seeming concerned about women’s issues (as opposed to just electing Democrats)

    Now to these unbelievably ignorant remarks: not only does this guy perpetuate negative female stereotypes (women are irrational and frequently overreact) and trivialize the real danger of rape on college campuses – he is also insulting the American population at large. Private citizens have been able to concealed carry for years and there hasn’t been any epidemic of people panicking and wildly shooting innocent people on the street who they irrationally imagined were threatening them.

    If this has ever happened A. I have never heard of it and B. I would imagine the number of private citizens who have imagined they were threatened and shot and killed someone when it turned out not to be necessary is probably far less than the number of police who have made such an error. (Yet I assume this Congressman would not disarm the police)

    Private citizens quite regularly use a gun to ward off would be attackers and the vast majority of the time don’t even feel the need to fire even a warning shot. (Simply showing the gun, or holding it on the attacker is usually enough) Young women have ALREADY been able to carry a gun on some college campuses – yet AFAIK this scenario of a young woman shooting a guy just because she’s paranoid and he’s in the vicinity has never happened.

    So it would seem that it’s actually the Congressman who is being paranoid and irrational.

  • septembergurl

    Conservatives should give Slazar the full Todd Akin treatment — repeat his disgraceful remarks over and over across all media, make ads and run them, ask every Democrap in every setting whether they agree with Salazar and if not, are they prepared to hound him into retirement, and if not, why not? Tie it around the necks of every Democrap.

    For example, if the WH Press Corpse ever tear themselves away from the Tiger Beat, they could ask Obama what he thinks and if he agrees with Salazar, and will denounce Salazar or not?

    But of course this won’t happen.

    • sliverlining

      Example after example of lack of accountability with liberals can keep coming. I guess they are like the frog in the kettle and just get so used to it they can’t tell anymore.
      Socialism, taxes, baby killing, eco-fraud, junk science, Nobel prizes, even Israeli awards. All baseless, illogical, touchy-feely crap.

      Yet another “women’s group” braying into the microphone. Yeah, that helps . . .

  • Tbone

    What the majority of women are too stupid to realize is that the Democrats consider them to be Vote Cows to be milked for their votes just like blacks are considered Vote Plantation slaves and Jews are considered money/vote bags. What is funny is that now the Democrats see illegal aliens as fruit picking/burger flipping/hotel toilet cleaning/SEIU dues paying migrant voters, blacks are starting to realize that because there are more of them that blacks are slippin’ down the old pandering totem pole.

    And yes, I do consider all 4 blocks above to be absolute fools.

  • huapakechi

    I recognized the Kalifornication of Colorado back in 1993, and that’s when I left. Blithering idiots such as salazar are but a symptom of the disease.

  • http://www.bohnetlaw.com rightappeal

    While the Salazar-Akin comparisons are obvious, the reason they will be treated differently is because the Dems aren’t responding to Salazar in the absurdly stupid manner that Republicans responded to Akin. Both Akin’s and Salazar’s remarks were absurd but were also defensible if some allowance being made for context and misstatement. It would be absurd to conclude from their statements that either actually supports rape, or even that they didn’t care if women were raped. The Dems are defending Salazar’s comments in that way, so those who see his comments as outrageous or offensive will likely be limited to people who wouldn’t support him anyway.

    But the Dems were able to characterize Akin’s comments so absurdly because many Republicans rushed out to declare his comments indefensible and to demand that he drop out of the race. That made it much tougher for Akin to defend himself effectively, and allowed Dems to pile on with little fear of rebuttal. The condemnation of the GOP firmly established to the public mind that their nominee held absurd and intolerable views on rape. Had they rallied around him and defended him, I believe that both he and Richard Mourdock would today be U.S. Senators.

    • Bill S

      Exactly. Spot on target.

    • PowerToThePeople

      I second Bill’s reply, spot on!

    • clowngirl

      The reason they will be treated differently is because Akin is a Republican and Salazar is a Democrat. period.

      Neither simply misspoke — both clearly had some genuinely ignorant ideas– though I haven’t heard either accused of supporting rape– that isn’t the issue.

      There’s a difference between being indifferent to rape and simply having no idea what is going on with regard to the issue (how prevalent the crime is on college campuses, whether women carrying guns has led to fewer rapes, etc.)

      I don’t see anyone accusing this guy of being pro-rape–I would assume he- like most people is against rape- that doesn’t mean there aren’t problems with his comments.

      As to Akin being sunk by Republicans– here in CO Ken Buck made what was perceived as a sexist remark during the primary season in 2010– it wasn’t nationalized and I don’t remember Republicans going out of their way to condemn him- but he still lost, almost certainly because of that remark. with the election returns strongly suggesting that many Coloradans voted Republican in every race but his.

      Point being – he dug his own grave. It wasn’t the rest of the party’s fault.

      • davesinsanantonio

        The reason a Republican is treated differently than a Dimocrap is that the parties treat them differently. When a Dim says something stupid the rest of the Dims, including the media, either rally in defense, or ignore it. When a Republican says something stupid a bunch of other Republicans pounce and demand that he/she withdraw from the race. This gives the Dims, including the media, an opportunity to also demand our candidate withdraw, but it also allows them to thereafter ignore every other part of that candidates platform and focus only on the calls for him/her to withdraw. And then other Republicans and the independent voters don’t vote for a candidate that his/her own party no longer supports!!!! When we throw our own under the bus, which the Dimocraps almost never do, we lose elections we might have won and just make the Dims that much stronger. If the rest of the party would just shut up we would have many more seats. But, they insist on yapping against our own and give many seats away. In the political real world it would usually be better to have a seat filled by one of our own who may have said a stupid thing than to have that seat filled by the enemy.

  • aliswell

    Joey,
    Just as soon as you stop making boorish, macho, Neanderthal statements I will stop regarding you as a boorish, macho Neanderthal. Your RACE ~ which to you the sun rises and sets on ~ has no relevance to anything.

  • rightlane1111

    FORBID…cut your tongue out…and this came from the party that “loves” women.

    ” Salazar said, indicating he believes young women should not have the
    right to self defense with a firearm because they may make careless
    decisions when they fear being sexually assaulted. HUH?

    If there were suggestion that women aim for the groin area with a gun when being raped….we wouldn’t have this problem.